The one thing that's always struck me as one of the more odd discrepancies about the official line:
If you see a photo of the aftermath, and see a diagram of a plane that size hitting the size of the hole that was made, it makes no sense. The wingspan of a plane that size would have damaged at least part of the walls to each side of the hole. The only thing that could possibly have flown in there would have had to have been wingless.
@bobbilse "The wingspan of a plane that size would have damaged at least part of the walls to each side of the hole."
It did. The wing damage on the first floor was over a hundred feet wide, destroying dozens of steel-reinforced concrete columns & stonework. The Truther sites carefully only show you photos with that floor obscured by smoke or foam.
Here's a photo, with measurements:
Tinyurl (dot) com/3yu2hz
Never trust anything you read on a Truthy website. They lie.
Its not evidence of wrong-doing but you have to wonder why the most heavily fortified ("secure") building on earth has only one functioning camera that day and its a blurry parking-lot camera? I imagine if someone tries to streaks into the CIA naked they will be caught on at least 20 different camera before they make it to the building. Now take that naked person and make them airline plane sized. How do you miss it on camera?
What was the point? If they thought they could destroy the entire pentagon they must of been barking. It would take about 8 just to destroy the first section, and there is loads of other rings in it too... I can understand why they targeted the WTc, because it was so important, but that doesn't mean I think it's okay. They are total dicks, and fuck all muslims
ummm.... ??? Demolition? or wha? I've seen old footage and there was clearly NO debris at all what so ever that looked like it came from a plane... sources say, damage cause by a missile....
Cover up?
*A strategy to get the "AMERICANS" ya know, get'em fired up, and make "WAR" FeEl" rIgHT....
Actually there is a catalogue in which there were quite a few identifiable parts found from within the wound in the side of the wall including parts of the wings, undercarriage and even bodies...
@mikespikeforlife where is this 'catalogue'. Have you seen it. Can we see it. And yes the official government story says a Boeing 757 crashed into it. Big fucking deal. it's still a massive plane which, if you have a pair of eyes, you will realize isn't in this footage above!!!
Stop being so closed minded about this. Are you honestly telling me you think you can see a plane in this video above? I ACTUALLY CHALLENGE YOU TO SAY YES. CUS' IT'S NOT THERE.
@mikespikeforlife "there were quite a few identifiable parts found ... wings, undercarriage and even bodies"
There are lots of photos all over the Web showing that, even the bodies. Anyone too stupid to find those photos is really too stupid to even be discussing 9-11.
Of course, that covers a large percentage of the Truthie freaks who believe all the silly shit on Loose Change & Prison Planet because they're too stupid to find anything else.
A 747 is a plane tht is big enough to carry 500+ passengers.. people who believe in the official government story of a plane crashing at the pentagon are idiots!
the official government story is NOT that a 747 crashed into the side of the Pentagon and a boeing 747 does NOT carry 500+ passangers, so go do your research and get your facts straight before you go around parading your silly conspiracy theories
I see the plane and u know why cause im not a blind dumbass
iDropShot856 4 months ago
0:01
look carefully see the white shape
dose a 757 have a nose shaped like a global hawk drone ?
PanjshirGuerrilla 5 months ago
where is the plane
Neuromancer1943 5 months ago
There was a plane there. This cam is taking shots like 3 seconds apart. The smoke trail you see is a damaged engine smoking.
skullsk8r 5 months ago
The one thing that's always struck me as one of the more odd discrepancies about the official line:
If you see a photo of the aftermath, and see a diagram of a plane that size hitting the size of the hole that was made, it makes no sense. The wingspan of a plane that size would have damaged at least part of the walls to each side of the hole. The only thing that could possibly have flown in there would have had to have been wingless.
bobbilse 1 year ago
@bobbilse "The wingspan of a plane that size would have damaged at least part of the walls to each side of the hole."
It did. The wing damage on the first floor was over a hundred feet wide, destroying dozens of steel-reinforced concrete columns & stonework. The Truther sites carefully only show you photos with that floor obscured by smoke or foam.
Here's a photo, with measurements:
Tinyurl (dot) com/3yu2hz
Never trust anything you read on a Truthy website. They lie.
blueshark69 11 months ago
Its not evidence of wrong-doing but you have to wonder why the most heavily fortified ("secure") building on earth has only one functioning camera that day and its a blurry parking-lot camera? I imagine if someone tries to streaks into the CIA naked they will be caught on at least 20 different camera before they make it to the building. Now take that naked person and make them airline plane sized. How do you miss it on camera?
gaBehcuoDsuoitneterP 1 year ago
Comment removed
gaBehcuoDsuoitneterP 1 year ago
Comment removed
gaBehcuoDsuoitneterP 1 year ago
What was the point? If they thought they could destroy the entire pentagon they must of been barking. It would take about 8 just to destroy the first section, and there is loads of other rings in it too... I can understand why they targeted the WTc, because it was so important, but that doesn't mean I think it's okay. They are total dicks, and fuck all muslims
CarBonkers 1 year ago
i think israel did that to make us attack muslim.....by the way wheres the fuckin 747?????
MrHandsome000 1 year ago
ummm.... ??? Demolition? or wha? I've seen old footage and there was clearly NO debris at all what so ever that looked like it came from a plane... sources say, damage cause by a missile....
Cover up?
*A strategy to get the "AMERICANS" ya know, get'em fired up, and make "WAR" FeEl" rIgHT....
***~~~Karma will catch up to'em soon.
~Peace to all. =)
budgetguy 1 year ago
Actually there is a catalogue in which there were quite a few identifiable parts found from within the wound in the side of the wall including parts of the wings, undercarriage and even bodies...
mikespikeforlife 1 year ago
@mikespikeforlife where is this 'catalogue'. Have you seen it. Can we see it. And yes the official government story says a Boeing 757 crashed into it. Big fucking deal. it's still a massive plane which, if you have a pair of eyes, you will realize isn't in this footage above!!!
Stop being so closed minded about this. Are you honestly telling me you think you can see a plane in this video above? I ACTUALLY CHALLENGE YOU TO SAY YES. CUS' IT'S NOT THERE.
asfurley 1 year ago
@mikespikeforlife "there were quite a few identifiable parts found ... wings, undercarriage and even bodies"
There are lots of photos all over the Web showing that, even the bodies. Anyone too stupid to find those photos is really too stupid to even be discussing 9-11.
Of course, that covers a large percentage of the Truthie freaks who believe all the silly shit on Loose Change & Prison Planet because they're too stupid to find anything else.
blueshark69 11 months ago
@blueshark69
Yeah and it was that hardcore horrible that they cover the ground in no time...
Please dont be that stupid.
DerFreieMensch 5 months ago
your a dumbass
worldtruth1 2 years ago
A 747 is a plane tht is big enough to carry 500+ passengers.. people who believe in the official government story of a plane crashing at the pentagon are idiots!
IK407 2 years ago
the official government story is NOT that a 747 crashed into the side of the Pentagon and a boeing 747 does NOT carry 500+ passangers, so go do your research and get your facts straight before you go around parading your silly conspiracy theories
mikespikeforlife 1 year ago
I dont see no 747.....
MUDSWAT 2 years ago 2