Thats a lie, he NEVER EVER was able to paint like raphael, or even like the regular average academic painter, the few academic paintings attributed to him where probably done by his father. RESEARCH! Other than that he was a good artist.
truth is truth, 100% sure about what i said. Not only me, lots of people know that info, but guess why it hasnt been released so far! (some newspaper did said something about it, but it should be noticed in encyclopedic art books!)
I guess you also believe that virgins can give birth to a child?
historians have done a great job fooling and brainwashing people since long ago, always doubt, specially when the evidence is so clear.
The names of the paintings wrongfully attributed to picasso are: science and charity and first communion, picasso's hand had nothing to do with those paintings, also i like his cubist and late works, specially his insane drawings much more than the paintings.
NO, I do not. I do not have those kind of believes. I am not like those Americans that still believe that Al qaeda are behind the 9/11 and Harvey Oswald did what they told them he it, and weapon of mass destruction are some where in Irak.
It seems that some readings and videos on the internet has brainwashed some body's mind.
@trinitaterion What are you basing any of that statement on? Have you seen any of the DOZENS of drawings and paintings that he completed IN ART SCHOOL between the ages of 12 and 16. His father, a pretty unremarkable painter, famously retired his brushes when he realized the talent of his son. Picasso could not only paint like Raphael, he could paint like Velazquez by the time he was 16 or 17. This man defines early artistic mastery and subsequent redefinition. You, sir, are ignorant.
Travel a bit, it would be good for you. Just come to Spain and visit the Picasso Museum in Barcelona and also in Malaga and feel shocked by his early works. Outstanding works when he just was a kid and a teenager. Forget about what somebody said, just watch his work in person. (You can also find images on line). Please, if this is not your field, refrain of doing this kind of comment, you can make confuse a lot of young people. Do not mess around if you are not a professional.
Been there and also in madrid yes was a little bit disappointing to watch guernica finally, boring painting, he did much better works, but if you want to see a real cubist genius, which history owns the debt of putting him at the top of the modernist crop, check out the work of Pavel Filonov, one of the only TRUE genius of modern art.
Some one with enough knowledge in art would never expect to be amused by or have fun in front of the Guernica. That painting has nothing to do with boredom or fun. Some one who visited the Museo Picasso in Malaga and in Barcelona and saw his early works cannot say that type of things because he trust more some opinions he found on the internet!!! rather than thousands of Art Historians researches from ALL over the world from the last century!!
Filonov was still an art student, when Picasso already reinvented and recreated the History of Art, painting les demoiselles d'avignon (Beside Braque and Juan Gris). Filonov did not do cubism, even he liked to call what he did anti-cubism. His style was more realism, an analytic realism. He represented geometric shapes but do not think that that has something to do with cubism! (Enjoy with Juan Gris, the more elegant cubist).
Filonov has with no doubt good skills, but he was not a pioneer. To be the first one or one of the first ones in something has nothing to do with following what the others did. A lot of his paintings have nothing special, look like some other thousands. Could have been painted by thousands of others painters.
Who invented oil painting? who cares! , we look for good painters thats all.
Not to deny picasso GREAT contribution to art, but as a cubist he was not among the 3 best.
First by a mile Pavel Filonov, he was better among other things because he was trained classically first, he understood that perspective was a NECESARY thing for a cubist painting, to be truly cubist.
I could come and say that Cezanne invented cubism, take one of the later paintings of him and watch the details, they have the cubist aesthethic all over them. (the flats, the shadows, etc) and they are more naturalistic, less "designed".
Pavel filonov followed that filosophy in his paintings too. He was close to create a realist cubism, but didnt achieved it (no one has).
Cubism was a effort built by many men. No individual "invented" it.
At the end, cubism is a way of observating nature, is the ability to perceive the 5th dimension, in that aspect the really good artists at it were, Pavel Filonov and M.C Escher. Although none of both are recognized as cubists.
I think the frase was sayed by Joan Miro...
gerameny 2 months ago
Comment removed
gerameny 2 months ago
Thats a lie, he NEVER EVER was able to paint like raphael, or even like the regular average academic painter, the few academic paintings attributed to him where probably done by his father. RESEARCH! Other than that he was a good artist.
trinitaterion 2 months ago
@trinitaterion
I am an artist and also from Malaga. You do not know what you are talking about.
javiinfantes 2 months ago
@javiinfantes
truth is truth, 100% sure about what i said. Not only me, lots of people know that info, but guess why it hasnt been released so far! (some newspaper did said something about it, but it should be noticed in encyclopedic art books!)
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@javiinfantes
There was a nice site documenting all that, picassofraud but someone removed it. wonder why..
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
I guess you also believe that virgins can give birth to a child?
historians have done a great job fooling and brainwashing people since long ago, always doubt, specially when the evidence is so clear.
The names of the paintings wrongfully attributed to picasso are: science and charity and first communion, picasso's hand had nothing to do with those paintings, also i like his cubist and late works, specially his insane drawings much more than the paintings.
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
NO, I do not. I do not have those kind of believes. I am not like those Americans that still believe that Al qaeda are behind the 9/11 and Harvey Oswald did what they told them he it, and weapon of mass destruction are some where in Irak.
It seems that some readings and videos on the internet has brainwashed some body's mind.
javiinfantes 1 month ago
Comment removed
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@javiinfantes
check the net i just did a quick survey, this is not so secret as people think, google:
Fraudulenta Exposición: Picasso. La Passion du Dessin, Paris
Theres everything there!
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@trinitaterion What are you basing any of that statement on? Have you seen any of the DOZENS of drawings and paintings that he completed IN ART SCHOOL between the ages of 12 and 16. His father, a pretty unremarkable painter, famously retired his brushes when he realized the talent of his son. Picasso could not only paint like Raphael, he could paint like Velazquez by the time he was 16 or 17. This man defines early artistic mastery and subsequent redefinition. You, sir, are ignorant.
notoriousyid 1 month ago
@notoriousyid
Absolutely correct.
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
Travel a bit, it would be good for you. Just come to Spain and visit the Picasso Museum in Barcelona and also in Malaga and feel shocked by his early works. Outstanding works when he just was a kid and a teenager. Forget about what somebody said, just watch his work in person. (You can also find images on line). Please, if this is not your field, refrain of doing this kind of comment, you can make confuse a lot of young people. Do not mess around if you are not a professional.
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@javiinfantes
Been there and also in madrid yes was a little bit disappointing to watch guernica finally, boring painting, he did much better works, but if you want to see a real cubist genius, which history owns the debt of putting him at the top of the modernist crop, check out the work of Pavel Filonov, one of the only TRUE genius of modern art.
trinitaterion 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
Some one with enough knowledge in art would never expect to be amused by or have fun in front of the Guernica. That painting has nothing to do with boredom or fun. Some one who visited the Museo Picasso in Malaga and in Barcelona and saw his early works cannot say that type of things because he trust more some opinions he found on the internet!!! rather than thousands of Art Historians researches from ALL over the world from the last century!!
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
...unless you did not get anything or wasted your time travelling.
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
Filonov was still an art student, when Picasso already reinvented and recreated the History of Art, painting les demoiselles d'avignon (Beside Braque and Juan Gris). Filonov did not do cubism, even he liked to call what he did anti-cubism. His style was more realism, an analytic realism. He represented geometric shapes but do not think that that has something to do with cubism! (Enjoy with Juan Gris, the more elegant cubist).
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
Filonov has with no doubt good skills, but he was not a pioneer. To be the first one or one of the first ones in something has nothing to do with following what the others did. A lot of his paintings have nothing special, look like some other thousands. Could have been painted by thousands of others painters.
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
pablo-ruiz-picasso(dot)net
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@trinitaterion
pablo-ruiz-picasso(dot)net
I hope he had painted some of these ones ( you have thousands there).
javiinfantes 1 month ago
@javiinfantes
Picasso = kid fooling around
Filonov = master of true cubism
Who invented oil painting? who cares! , we look for good painters thats all.
Not to deny picasso GREAT contribution to art, but as a cubist he was not among the 3 best.
First by a mile Pavel Filonov, he was better among other things because he was trained classically first, he understood that perspective was a NECESARY thing for a cubist painting, to be truly cubist.
trinitaterion 3 weeks ago
@javiinfantes
I could come and say that Cezanne invented cubism, take one of the later paintings of him and watch the details, they have the cubist aesthethic all over them. (the flats, the shadows, etc) and they are more naturalistic, less "designed".
Pavel filonov followed that filosophy in his paintings too. He was close to create a realist cubism, but didnt achieved it (no one has).
Cubism was a effort built by many men. No individual "invented" it.
trinitaterion 3 weeks ago
@trinitaterion
All right man. Nothing new.
javiinfantes 3 weeks ago
@javiinfantes
At the end, cubism is a way of observating nature, is the ability to perceive the 5th dimension, in that aspect the really good artists at it were, Pavel Filonov and M.C Escher. Although none of both are recognized as cubists.
trinitaterion 3 weeks ago
Would take most artist 40 years to paint like Raphael
eposyba 5 months ago
What a glorious man.
Twankiez1019 5 months ago
SPANISH DO BETTER
mikemer79 7 months ago
::: Congratulations for this beautiful video dedicated
to the GREAT & Exhilarating MASTER ... - Alias: - " Pablo PICASSO " ... ! )
-
::: Love in someway is like a " Bank Account " ... Nothing you' ll put in it and nothing you' ll find in it ... :::
-
(( AUTHOR : Pino GAUDIOSO ))
-
PinoGAUDIOSO4you 8 months ago
Wow. Imagine what the guy working behind him must have been thinking...
jeremy197624 8 months ago
great artist but supported bullfighting
ultracreyente 11 months ago
The Spaniard...
CurtisHalfHalf 1 year ago
Un grand homme.
vatchkleyden 1 year ago