Added: 1 year ago
From: WhiteJarrah
Views: 3,415
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (80)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • You claim the anti moon hoax people never offer proof to back up there claims that's not true.

    You were trying to monopolize the guy. There were many people who wanted to talk to him not just you.

    Here we are with the star thing again. You Moon hoax people always say the same stuff. Listen you would not see stars with bright daylight reflection off things, your pupils would be too small. You obviously aren't a photographer! Try shooting stars with a narrow shutter opening.

  • Armstrong was on the moon; Plait wasn't.

  • Kaysing quote Part I

    "How 'bout any actual atmosphere, like John Glenn in space, Yuri Gargarin - were they actually in space?"

    "I doubt it."

  • Kaysing quote Part II

    "So the Soviet Union faked that Yuri Gargarin was in space, and that dog that died, Laika, really didn't die?"

    "Mmm...I don't think he was up there. See, there was a fellow by the name of Lloyd Mallin in the early '70s who wrote a very detailed book saying that all - well, nearly all - possibly all of the Soviet space exploits were faked, and he proved it with photographs and technical data and so forth. I still have a copy of that book."

  • Funny that you could use the word "astronaut" when you're talking about yourself, but you couldn't say "astronaut" when talking about the those others who ACTUALLY went into space. You didn't read what Plait said verbatim--you left stuff out. Wow.

    Plait summed up your mental condition perfectly.

  • White, you're an undiagnosed paranoid schizophrenic.

  • mythbusters BUSTED!!

  • @SilverShamrock71 yes lol - i love this series, Jarrah is very thorough, up to the point of hiding cameras and microphones on his person lol - the james bond music was a great touch lol

  • @CokeSupply lol, yeah nice touch...

  • The reason they refuse to talk to you is because they feel insulted as hell by hoaxers like you and don't want to have anything to do with your nonsense.

    THAT alone is a very obvious sign that the moon landings ARE IN FACT real, since they feel offended and insulted by your stubborn scepticism.

  • Adam Savage was BUSY WITH OTHER FANS, is that really so extremely hard to realize?

    You're not the only person at the party who wanted to speak to him, and your questions were incredibly boring anyway.

  • @Laurelindo ... no idiot, when ur speaking to someone you finish, jarrah was not rude.... or do you do what Savage did when speaking, i.e. being rude

  • @pt1gard Eh, you might as well say that it's rude of Adam and Jamie to not respond to every mail they get.

    You know, there were lots of fans there asking lots of questions, and since Jarrah White was just another impertinent conspiracy theorist Adam didn't feel like standing there and explaining everything for an hour, because hoaxers never listen to anything anyway.

  • @Laurelindo ... hey shill, would you come on the radio and debate me and jarrah, bring along windley or plait; oh thats right, they soil themselves at the sight of JW ... LMFAO, i can get a time on the radio, step right up, you pedantic POS

  • @Laurelindo ... PS, did you see the apollogist's face when JW schooled him, priceless! go back and review how many times he blinked and how sour his countenance grew... lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @pt1gard I can explain absolutely any conspiracy theory, just bring up your arguments and I will debunk them, one by one.

    I promise.

  • @Laurelindo ... lmfao, NURSE NAYIRAH, start there, dumbfuk

  • @pt1gard What? If you can grow mature to a degree that you can manage to post a sensible answer, then go ahead and mention absolutely any hoax teory in the world - I can explain it in detail, and then some!

  • You had a point until you claimed you were a 911 truther.

    debunking911(.)com

    911myths(.)com

    Forensic evidence? LOL like nanothermite? There are many explanations about that.(refer to the websites above)

    You are just as bad as the moon hoaxers you know.

    There is an overwhelming majority of facts on the 911 debunkers side and you know it. You just pick individual tidbits that are hard to explain and use it in your argument, bypassing the astronomical amount of evidence proving your argument wrong

  • You are like an annoying little fly. Its quite laughable how much time you have spent on this subject. If we can fly probes and robotic vehicles to places like Titan and Europa which are MILLIONS of miles away, is it beyond human thought that we can send people to a little ball of rock 238,000 miles away? We landed on the moon, deal with and pursue something worthwhile. I respect Phil Plait and can see why he didnt want to talk to you, he made you look like a dick.

  • @taphoenix .. you are a shill, JW toyed with savage and plait

  • If you want to be famous be a skeptic of the moon landings and have your own TV show. Government loves people who are pro moon landings.

  • NICE WORK WHITE

  • I'd like to know why ArcAngel4Myke's videos are so prominent on Youtube.

    ArcAngel4Myke is to the Moon Hoax Theory, what Simon Shack is to 9/11 truth.

    i.e. - intentionally misleading disinformation.

  • Me too! I always wanted to be one of the first people on Mars, but then I guess that isn't going to happen to us soon, is it?

    sigh :(

  • Phil Plait totally spotted that goofy spy pen. LOL!

  • Thanks for the videos Jarrah. The we went to the moon story is losing its'power. But it takes time.

    I always wonder about Plait and others if they're dumb or dishonest.

  • That retroreflector stuff is so lame (4:50). A laser still does have divergence albeit less than a normal light. At the distance of the moon a tiny cubic mirror will make absolutely no difference to the power of the reflected signal. They were bouncing lasers off the moon since the 60's as mentioned. The moon is 380,000km away FFS! Some tiny mirror makes a difference? Oh please.

  • the answer about why you occupy your self on apollo ,i thing it should be: "why not?"

    im sure they have an answer but they will never respond.

  • Jarrah, you must have a thick skin. It bothered me just to hear that Phil guy talk down to you.

  • @MrNeptunebob "Jarrah, you must have a thick skin. It bothered me just to hear that Phil guy talk down to you."

    He also tried to intimidate me with his height. I'm about 5'5", he's at least 6'3". When he refused the interview he also gave me a look that says "I'm taller so that makes me better than you". I'm not so easily intimidated.

  • @WhiteJarrah

    Good thing you are not so intimidated. Phil is typical of an incredilby arrogant American college/university professor. That's right, US universities train people to be aholes, some of that has even happend to me! Professors are so arrogant it eventually rubs off on the students, especially if you get an advanced degree. How do you have the self confidence to deal with this, being Austrailian dealing with American a--holes like us?

  • @WhiteJarrah Phil plait already seems like a liar/douchebag from watching Moonfaker now this... He's make it so obv. he should just spill the beans! He actually has fans? :O

  • @WhiteJarrah People are tired of you annoying hoaxers, because all you do is complaining and accusing innocent and courageous people of lying.

    Someone who is so stupid that he believes a president would risk getting murdered by the entire New York City for arranging 9/11 is not worth any respect at all.

  • @WhiteJarrah

    Yes you are easily intimidated. You gibbered your way through your great moment with Neil Armstrong. You are a pathetic and uneducated paranoid waste case.

  • get a life. seriouslt

  • @WhiteJarrah Are you serious about the laser question to Savage? First off, he never said in the program that it was "impossible" for a laser beam to be reflected back from the lunar surface (he never used the word "impossible"). It was just not possible using the laser beam used by the Apache Observatory. Secondly, the 1962 experiments were different experiments, i.e. different laser, and accordingly a different setup. So, my question is, what's your point in asking such a question? Cheers

  • To the apollo defenders here: how do you explain the contradiction at the end of this video about seeing stars on the moon?

  • Phil Plait is a pompous condescending arrogant prick. What he did, by refusing to speak to Jarrah , was just plain rude. On behalf of the United States, I offer a profound apology for Phil's maltreatment of a true gentleman... Jarrah White.

    I applaud Jarrah for his tenacity and honor... 

    Jarrah deserves a profound THANK YOU! for his dedication and hard work!

  • Sigh... I believe the moon landing was a hoax - but Jarrah - this is just ambush journalism.

  • @potamuspeter

    Is it really ambush journalism? I have seen fans of the apollo moon missions do what basically Jarrah did and they got interviews with Plait. Search up on youtube Plait TAM 8 and you will see that I am right.

  • watch?v=OS77R8cNsls

  • watch?v=whldhIPyXmY

  • I would change "would" in Plait's statement to "could"...

    Very different

  • Conspiracy theories have only one purpose - to create fear and mistrust within the community.

  • @roguemale57

    That sounds like a conspiracy to me.

  • Yeah, Jarrah, you pretty much heckled both of them. Most of what you did, I believe is a tactic called "Ambush journalism". If the tone in your voice wasn't bad enough, you insisted that they both answer your questions.

    I believe only the people gullible enough to follow you will find this as proof that these men are liars.

  • @Europasingstome "I believe only the people gullible enough to follow you will find this as proof that these men are liars."

    In that case would you be so kind as to do what Plait has refused to do for years: show me where Bill Kaysing said "any space travel is impossible" as Plait alleges.

  • @WhiteJarrah I wouldn't know. I'm not a follower of Plait's work, and the first time I had heard of Kaysing is when I watched your videos.

    But hasn't factored in that the guy might have made a mistake? Maybe misread a quote of Kaysing?

  • @Europasingstome  "But hasn't factored in that the guy might have made a mistake?"

    Doubtful. Plait SPECIFICALLY refers to the interview on Nardwaur radio. In his blog about Kaysing's death, Plait writes: "he was still wrong, and made claims that are sickening (NASA killed the Apollo 1 astronauts to keep them quiet; NASA blew up Challenger on purpose to keep the astronauts quiet about the “fact” that space travel is impossible"

  • @Europasingstome

    CONTINUED.

    A link to the interview in question is in the sidebar. No where does Kaysing claim that space travel is impossible and in fact he specifically says unmanned lunar probes possibly did go to the moon. Possible is the opposite of impossible.

  • @WhiteJarrah After skimming the page, I've seen a few things that might point to Plait thinking that, which I won't get into detail about (in comments, anyway.), which could lead to the possible conclusion that he just read what Kaysing said wrong. Maybe he thought Kaysing didn't think MANNED space flight was possible.

    Either way, it's a moot friggin' point. It really has nothing to do with the Moon landing conspiracy, does it? This all just feels like a way to discredit your opponents.

  • @Europasingstome

    "This all just feels like a way to discredit your opponents."

    No, the opponents use that made up quote to discredit Kaysing. Now the question is, why?

  • @adiohead That is speculation, really.

  • @WhiteJarrah I mean, you make it out like everyone at coming for your throat. As if your opinion stirs the natural balance of things.

    Have you thought for a minute that you might have just pissed these guys off? And that's why they wouldn't answer your questions? I mean, you totally pulled a Sibrel here.

  • @WhiteJarrah lol you're even DOING exactly what europainsingstome is talking about RIGHT HERE!

    "don't be an asshole"

    "well let me just be an asshole for one second"

    serioulsy, you are LOST to time.

  • Comment removed

  • Respond to this video... heckled them??? thats called polite journalism, shill... what was he supposed to do, plait ducks him like anthrax, what a pussy Savage is ...plus get a real haircut, doofus

  • I'm not sure what to think about Mr Plait's avoiding the interview he said he'd do. I'm also thinking it's unlikely he found time during all that to stop and look you up and watch your videos. After all, if he had that kind of time, why not just talk directly with you?

  • @stbays He said it near the end. Pretty much Plait doesn't trust him to represent Plait's side of the argument fairly.

    Which is pretty true, I don't think Jarrah really has represented anyone very fairly, even if they deserved to be.

  • @Europasingstome

    Guess what I was getting at is, clearly Plait must've known who Jarrah was the whole time since he couldn't have really done any indepth research in the time he had between speaches and interviews. He did claim he was to busy to answer a few questions and that Jarrah first had to set up an interview, one he claimed at first he'd do.

    Do I think this changes anything? No, I still think we went to the moon. I just think men should honor their word or not give it at all.

  • @stbays

    Well said. Plaits not a man off his word.

  • @stbays Eh true.

    But then again, it's hard to judge times. Plus, since Plait does do a bit of research into the moon hoax conspiracy, he might know of the players.

  • @Europasingstome If Plait does so much research into the moon hoax, why would he admit to astronomy buffs that you can indeed see stars on the moon, even during the day....A complete contradiction to Armstrongs comment about being unable to see stars, by eye alone, without using optics...

    Seems poor plaity just can't keep his Apollo Facts/Lies straight.

    That you cannot understand this is proof of your unwielding faith in Apollo, without looking at the facts!

  • @un4g1v3n1 Did you know the highest form of evidence in court is the lowest form of evidence in science?

  • @Europasingstome You are truly an idiot. Jarrah is the only one who actually sources his information/quotes/what-have-y­ou. If you'd pull your head out of plait-minded butts, long enough to actually watch Jarrah's videos, you'd know that already. It's the apollogists, who constantly blather on, without quoting a source, other than obviously fraudulent NASA documents.

    It's like how plait throws out the logic word, without actually saying anything logical

  • @un4g1v3n1

    Because all NASA documents are lies and deceit.

    Unless, of course, they're strengthening your claim, then they are right on the money.

    amirite?

  • Plait is a coward! Keep up the good work JW!

  • Amazing that Savage has a platform to spew his mess on discovery channel, but if you ask some hard questions, then you're considered to be a heckler.

  • Jarrah, i liked you buying some pounds of moondust-simulator. You could have mentioned that too :-)

  • You amaze me Jarrah, not only have you given a convincing argument about how the mythbusters failed at disproving the moon hoaxes, but you also caught Phil Plait with his pants down and exposed him.

    Well done Jarrah :) Power to Jarrah White!

  • you are the best man

  • Phil Plait is a dishonest coward for refusing to answer your simple questions, Jarrah .. No wonder all of the Apollogists despise you so much .. You show up all of their Apollo "heros" for the liars they really are.

  • My letter to the editor of Las Vegas Weekly has been sent. I'll let you know if, and when I get a response Jarrah!! BTW, how about a link to that radio interview Jarrah?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more