Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (100)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • there was no plane..it was a missle which was covered up by holographic imaging..research and learn properly before debating this situation.

  • Watch "9/11 missing Links" if you want to know who was behind this.

  • this is one thing i don't get at 1:14 through 1:23 that shot looks like it was taken in late afternoon it happen in the morning with nice blue skyies so why is there clouds in the picture and a late sunset???

  • how best to mask bombing with airplane hitting the towers.

    the perps are more devious than given credit to.

  • LOL.. Someone is trying really hard to confuse the NO PLANE CONCLUSION. No Way a Plane or ANYTHING flew into the Towers on 911. If anyone had REAL Footage of a plane hitting either Tower someone woulda produced it... Every Single Video with a Plane in it is Fake. Period! NO PLANES NO HIJACKERS NO TERRORISTS ALL VIDEO FAKERY AND LIES.. Rest assured tonite everyone.. Muslim Extremists are NOT tryin' to Kill you... The War on Terror is a LIe.

  • If you want to successfully cover up something like this it's quite simple. All the government has to do is play a giant game of Chinese whispers. Saturate the public with conspiracy theories so that no one knows what is truth or lies, with all such conspiracy theories loosing all of their credibility. Secondly 9/11 has had a huge psychological impact on the American public and the world, It's natural for people to put up a wall, for it being to painful to even consider a cover up.

  • if there were other explosives....how come it had to be or government? couldnt al-qaeda have insurgents in new york at the time?

  • America...

  • Watch 911 Missing Links!

  • Planes, no planes. All of it designed to keep us busy fighting with each other. Who cares if there were planes or if it was a missle. You all missed the point. Our government is lying to us, they killed there own people just to start a war and it isn't the first time. So go ahead and have your planes no planes thing or how about you guys have a fight over who has the right anwser, cause that's all it's really about. Does it really matter if there were planes or not, does it change what happened?

  • Well Said ! Take Heed People.

  • @CasualtyofProduction ill tell you why it matters if there was a dam plane or not , because the lie is that the planes were hijacked , as long as you have planes you have terrorist , no planes and the controlled media is exposed.

  • It takes a better man to admit when he had made a mistake & a better man you are. I think a lot of people who are against those asking questions about 911 and saying it WAS AN INSIDE JOB, don't realize that we would love to be wrong. Personally, I would love to be wrong, & to find out that the gov had no hand in it, they only told the truth, and all of it, and that they didn't cover anything up or lie. But, common sense tells me they will never tell the truth without us forcing them. 5 star post

  • Far be it from SOME of you "Truthers" to have the balls to challenge Dylan Avery on anything.

    175 was still flying an hour after it supposedly crashed into the tower. Shakes head at the idiocy of some people.

  • Dont you think it would be difficult to hide dynamite in the office?

    Those insiders would have run as hell after they lid the fuses.

    The pankake theory is reliable, sounds smart.

    Think about it...pankake...mmm..

  • There was a plane that was added in place of a missle and I will soon have that footage along with many other tapes that were taken that week> I've found a new way of obtaining news footage from civilians that were taping that day hehehe for me peace out

  • Do you think tv lies?. What about the ads on tv with the audiens and all?

  • Well done for publicly admitting your mistake.

  • It sucks, but there's a LOT of disinfo from the government, and the Truth Movement doesn't need to be spreading disinfo either. There's a lot of crazy conspiracy theories, such as the "no planes" conspiracy, and I try to separate them from the truth.

  • There is not just a "np plane" theory. There are even at least two different "no plane" theories: some people say, that they added CGI planes to the news footage which they have been filming live. Some other people say, that ALL footage seen on TV that day was faked, so they didn't even film it live.

    What is the point of having different "trues" which contradict each other? Unless it is deliberate disinformation. But who is seeding the "wrong truth"?

  • @911TruthVideos MUST WATCH: 1) CONFESSIONS of an ECONOMIC HITMAN  2) HIJACKING CATASTROPHE These two riveting documentarys fill in a lot of pieces inot the NWO M.O. ALso recommend reading Wesley Tarpley's "The Unauthorized Biography of G.H.W.Bush. This well researched book has great history on the treachorous Dulles brothers and the Bush legacy. Go to Tarpley(dot)net

  • here is one HOW problem i see in your argument, if there was some huge inside job going on and the planes that flew into the towers weren't even the planes the gov said they were later on, why the fuck would they not be able to slap a simple paint job on em to make them look like the planes they were trying to imitate.

  • i think they did. none of the news footage shows much colors on the planes, but the majority, not all, but the majority of the eyewitnesses said they looked like American and United AIrlines 767s. i do think they 'slapped the paint job on' but why the cameras didnt show any of that i do not know

  • You missed one vital thing out in this video. regarding the clip showing no plane. There is another clip identical which show the plane coming in at a different angle -

  • why would the govt want to do such a thing?

    to my mind it simply doesn't matter why, what matters is it happened, what matters is nobody BUT the U.S. govt was capable of pulling it off, standing down NORAD & covering it up (the 9-11 commission didn't even mention building 7, & it said that where the money came from doesn't matter)

    does it really matter why a father goes beserk & slaughters his own kids?? or why a gunman goes on a shooting rampage??

    certainly not to the dead people!!

  • i still cant see the plane at all neither did reporters on the ground

  • 9/11 WAS an inside job - there is absolutely no doubt in the mind of ANYONE who has actually bothered to research this topic in depth

    however, like a mother who refuses to believe her son is a murderer,, many Americans simply cannot face the truth that their own govt is directly responsible for 9/11

    watch this movie - then make up your own mind

    9-11-Blueprint-For-Truth

  • your a moron, i guess the government forced the shootings at fort hood right?, and i guess they had multiple failed attempts at blowing up planes since then right?? NO it is Muslim bastards doing this! tell me what you think the governments motivation would be to do this then, if your so convinced!

  • possibly *

  • yeah Muslims in caves half way round the world stood NORAD down for 80 mins, & managed to fit out the buildings with the demolitions required to take down the towers (which were designed to withstand multiple plane hits) & building 7 which was never even hit by a plane

    did you bother to watch the movie "9-11-blueprint-for-truth"?? or does the evidence compiled by over 430 American architects and civil engineers mean nothing to you?

    a moron is one who refuses to even see the evidence

  • thats wat im sayin thats just stupid

  • @RainyDayBlue8

    kk sorry, lots of these conspiracy faggots always say 1+1= 2 or something in sense of 911 was an inside job

  • There is not ONE shred of evidence of those 2 planes, flight 11 and flight 175. Not one shred. And if planes brought these 2 HUGE towers down, why are people standing in the holes supposedly made by these aircraft? And why do fragile aluminum wingtips go through solid steel that has held up for 30 years against the worst weather New York has to offer? Looking at it with common sense....it doesn't make sense.

  • Look VERY closely at the Naudet footage of the 1st "plane" hitting. There is no telling what that thing is but it is not a Boeing 767.

  • Yo mr. 9/11 truth what these other dumbasses are not realizing is that this is a contradicting flight path,,,,,,,,,most of the other footages show a flat trajectory,,,,,,,,but others show this diving trajectory,,,,,,,,,you can't have it both ways my friend,,,,,,,,,just the fact that there is conflicting plane paths is enough evidence to me,,,,,,,and should be enough for any normal person,,,,,,,,,to question why we are being lied to and decieved like this,,,,,,,insulting to our intelligence

  • interesting punctuation you have there,,,,,,,,,,, bigbopper

  • you like that eh,,,,,,,,,,i try to be unique my friend,,,,,,,,,,tell me what your take is on 9/11,,,,,,,,,,,,let me know what your annalytical mind tells you

  • Well he said he was half wrong! "ok there was a plane, but I am still right about other stuff."

    The traces of chemicals that can be found in thermite can also be found in other substances that are used to make buildings.

    Having said that, Jerry Lobdill (google his papers) do make interesting reading.

  • at least you can admit when your wrong not like other people

  • you should just upload the videos telling the truth and remove any other distractions like this one!

  • I'm not a no-planer but I think if we would be able to see WTC 1's antenna, then we should be able to see the plane.

  • erm no... as you can see the vision is more blury than the one where you can see the plane. DUH

  • Yeah planes crashed into the WTC, there were real terrorists. But those were recruited and led by a man who was leading the anti-soviet movement in Afghanistan, paid for by the US: Osama. So, the head terrorist was an experienced leader of dupes willing to lay down their lives for a cause that wasn't even their own, but financed and led by foreigners (US).

  • Not necesarily an inside job...but they definately covered up truth.

    Britannica(dotcom) has an article about the Reichstag Fire that discusses whether or not the Nazis were involved in the incident or, "Others have contended that there was no proof of Nazi complicity in the crime, but that Hitler merely capitalized on van der Lubbes independent act. "

    I see no evidence that any member of our government directly assisted...however, there IS evidence that they failed to investigate/report

  • Thanks for posting this video to debunk the "no plane" theory. ...that helps people focus on real questions like:

    v=hwJgY3zYics

    v=-59kouBgO_s

    v=J5tGbXAvMXA Look closely at 6:24. How is that possible if the trusses were sagging (downward) from intense heat?

    v=-9K4PMMhlyk

    v=iEuJimaumW4

    v=6mxFRigYD3s

    v=UbSIu3IosdE

    I'm not willing to point the finger at ANYONE for 911 until a proper investigation is conducted. Innocent until proven guilty...there are a lot of questions that need to be answered.

  • You see no evidence? Well thank you for setting us all straight.

    WTF??

    Start doing some more research and watch the documentaries done by Pilots for 911 Truth.

    It doesn't matter if YOU see evidence. The fact is we need a new independent investigation of this horrific crime. It STINKS of government complicity, if not DIRECT INVOLVEMENT.

  • I agree that there needs to be a new, independent (thoural) investigation into the events of 911.

    But I am not willing to point fingers at anyone (especially our government) until a proper investigation concludes that they are guilty.

  • I glad to see somebody debunk there own post. It proves there not government shills, out saying reptilian aliens or bigfoot had something to do with 911.

    The facts are whats important. And we did not get them after waiting 5 years.

    To many questions need to be answered.

    When the head of the 911 commission says the government lied to them, that's reason enough to call for another investigation, with full subpoena power, and a special prosecutor, like they sent after Clinton.

    YEA SURE.

  • I think you might be replying to the wrong person. If not what are you asking me if the footage shows a plane? Apparently it does becasue not only did I believe planes hit the building already but now one of your truther buddies is admitting he was wrong bout the footage. So...you fucking walking ad for abortions....I do have my own opinion which was further driven by the fact this guy admitted he was wrong. Douchebag

  • I still disagree with you about the inside job, but kudos to you for admitting being wrong. Takes balls.

  • I'm against truthers especially, the no plane theory ones, but at least he had the balls to admit he was wrong. He didn't act like other truthers and create a false arguement to prove why he is still right, making a mockery of all the theories in the process. I give'em credit for that at least. As far as no planes, Seth Macfarlane was scheduled on for one of the flights but missed it so the flights were real and booked. DEBUNKED.

  • booked doesn't necessarily mean that they happened to head towards the towers..so basing your debunking soley on that fact is loose at best..not saying it was an inside or outside job; it happened

  • Your right it doesn't but it makes it 99% sure (although I'm 100% sure of it). By the flights being booked, you get names of passengers, addresses, credit card numbers, etc, which gives you more people to involve in the "conspiracy". The fact flights were booked show they existed/

  • ok..so u say that from this footage i can see a boeing crashing into the south tower??that's what u sayin'?

  • Why argue when even your truther pal said he was wrong.

  • i dont give a fuck what he said..i'm askin'u..or u dont have ur own opinion..what he said..if he says jump from the cliff..will ya?

    moron

  • Besides all the namecalling, do you have any facts to back up your ravings ?

  • good effort man, like that you've actually gone on to set the record straight. there's a lot of stuff out there, and im comming late to the party

  • How did Bush see the first plan hit the building. There wasn't any footage of it at the time it happened. Its not like there were cameras looking for the first plane to hit. It was all over the news after. An the second one supposedly went into the second one when he was in the class room

  • Some people think he saw it on a closed circuit tv in the Presidential limo which wouldn't surprise me at all. Many think Naudet brothers filming was also inside setup so they could get film coverage of the hit. Control center for everything that day was WTC 7. Why do you think they didn't even mention that in the report?

  • id like to believe you but someone could just as easily, even more easily, with basic editing equipment, go in and erase the plane. occams razor. and since ive seen many videos, from many different cameras, and only this one with no plane, it would suggest that someone did indeed, erase over it to "prove conspiracy". damn straight there are secrets, esp in gov. but you need more then that buddy.

  • of course there was a plane. i think you missed my point of both this video and the original

  • i sure hope you don't think that i'm a subscriber to the no plane theory. if so then i think you didn't watch the whole video

  • i remember that day watching it live and seeing both airplanes hit the trade centers

  • ehrm?! do i get you right or wrong? you say there was NO plane! is that right?

    cause if you say there WAS a plane u better watch from an idiot carfully, on my chanel!

  • ah ok, now i finally get it! sorry dud, my english is still not perfect, but improving, so you say, the "plane" in the live shot was covered pu by the smaller resolution, but there was a plane in it just invisible. i reccoment to you to look at the third law of motion by newton, or just into from an idiot 13 on my chanel where i show a physics children site , then you can go back to your old statement cause there was no plane! ;) best wishes on finding the truth!

  • You people who believe in this conspiracy garbage have been duped. I saw the news live on that day and I saw the second plane hit the tower. There were planes at the WTC and at the Pentagon and in the field in PA. Anyone who claims there weren't is LYING to you. I know what I saw and I know it was real. I am telling you the truth you don't want to believe. 911 was NOT AN INSIDE JOB! You are fools to think it was.

  • Watch the whole video my friend. It's not saying that there was no plane. It's not even saying that the shot was faked. This video's purpose is to show that a conspiracy theory I believed in before has been debunked. Watch the vid dude before you comment.

  • first of all ive seen the orignal. ive known why there was no plane and because of the resolution for years. the thing is, the object looks nothing like a boeing 767 united airlines plane. none of the footages shows an accurate image of a united airlines plane. that object in the orignal nbc footage shows an object that isnt a plane. so what is that object? missile? the reporters didnt even see it coming.

  • right ^^ u saw the NEWS live with 17 sec delay, and the news never lie anyways! go back to the brainwashmachine (tv) theres no hope for you left!

  • The 9/11 imagery was but a pool of pre-fabricated footage. There should be no more doubt about this. Please go to :

    septembercluesDOTinfo

    thanks!

  • hey simon, i like your two new clips, will use a part of it for "from an idiot 11", coming soon!

  • great information but with todays digital imaging and editing it will never carry weight

  • america is a BITCH!!!

  • gta vice city : live is a bitch

  • If you would like to see proof of the faked images of 9/11 - Please see the About me comments in my Profile where you will find simple directions. If you would like to throw abuse at me, equally, please do feel free, after all, I still live in a free country (Just About)

  • I still don't believe the "terrorists" did that. Too much coincidence. And how in heel Bush instantly knew that the responsible for all of this were Osama Bin Laden.

    Anyway...

  • bush knew cuz osama bin laden sends threat videos to the USA, it was all over the news about his video's

  • I was watching cable news on 911 when the second plane hit the south tower. I saw the plane clearly on that broadcast. If you had been watching then you would have seen it too. I do not believe any of these conspiracy theories. Why is it that not one person has been charged. Why is it that no one has come forward to expose the alleged plot? It would have taken thousands of people to pull off any of these theories. Your theories make no sense. They are not factual.

  • To all who DON'T believe it was a set up, watch Loose Change 2nd Edition. It's one of the better films out there that more or less prove that 9/11 was an inside job. If you don't know or study the physics behind what those buildings were made of, the subsequent non-consistent damages, who signed off on what, a pre-existing U.S. Gov. plan that mirrors this from JFK era, terrorism specific insurance policies a month before, & the put-options on the stock of those airlines.

    It's clear to see.

  • right on delta9. So very true Another video the london bombing of 2003 Funny they where training for emergecy sitituations. They even had a bomb squad in there kegierstar demolation????......Funny why would a Training beocome real. Because if enough people are scared. Thenthey will demand stricker Laws that Can bring control into the world.Hmmmmm. Why would they want control. Oh yeah because they want us to demand for food clothes housing and they can charge what they want.

  • u were right when u said there was no plane m8, thats 2 small 2 b a airliner.google JASSM missile. it looks more like that!

  • killingmeDEADLY:

    You need to do your research.

    Start by searching google for the keywords > New World Order.

    Then watch a film called Zeitgeist Addendum. It a very depthy film, so pay attention. And if you truly understand it, you will be forced to believe it.

    Educate yourself, do your research, if you see doubt, pursue it, join us. We need your help, and everyone elses. We must come together and fight, or we will eventually be defeated. This is OUR world, why should THEY control it, and us.

  • "you will be forced to believe it"

    Funny choice of words; conspiracy theorists suggesting we should be forced to believe THEIR views? If that isn't hypocracy, I dont know what is.

  • why would the governement kill innocent people ?

  • So many ask - "Why would the govt do this to its own people?"

    A scared public is a public you can control. Destroying WTCs makes us scared (of terroists that don't exist) it all helps 'new world order'. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.

    They promise us order, they promise us peace, and all they demand in return is our silent obedient consent.

  • I don't see how your theory of "censors" and "silent obedient consent" is true, if you can say whatever the hell you want on YouTube.

  • Your doing great work. Excellent video.

    TRUTH SEEKERS HELP SPREAD THE WORD - 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

  • This is a distraction from the truth. Targeting on those who had not research the event more carefully.

  • I Totally agree with EVERYTHING your doing.

    Your RIGHT!

    Ignorance and Plain Simplicity of the american ppl that do not believe the wool is being pulled over thier eyes.

    Justice is needed, These's videos PROOF.

    Media is FULL of lies..

  • "Judgement Day", is not that far off we will see the Truth about this matter !!

  • Planes did hit the building as shown by the brothers who were filming their documentary. The city workers all turned their heads when the plane was going in to hit the tower, the only known video to show this. Also after the first plane hit every news agency in the world was now filming this, plus all the people on the ground, it's impossible, I agree 100% it's an inside job, but the towers were hit by planes. The other 2 sites bombs were used, no doubt. You only show 1 angle.

  • You missed the whole point of the video. Before you get all upset and use foul language and make the 9/11 Truth Movement look bad, watch the whole video. What I am saying is this: I said that a plane was added to ONE PARTICULAR PIECE OF FOOTAGE. I was wrong. Watch the video again.

    You're an embarrassment to those of us who are really trying to spread the truth. Grow up.

  • More importantly, let's remember that Jews own most of our TV and news media and Israel is the country benefiting most from the U.S. military presence in the Middle East.

    Boycott the media by turning it off.

  • A video was recently uploaded by YouTubReptilian.

    watch?v=6lepqPvru_s

    It too points out that no plane hit the building. I left a comment with your video correcting this resolution mistake.

  • Agreed... an inside job!

  • i dont get what were you wrong about?

    you now believe in the planes?

  • I always believed that there were planes. I just thought that the news footage was faked. I thought that on live TV no plane was visible. I thought it came from behind the buildings, but the media added the plane in from the side to make it more believable. However, the plane was there the whole time.

  • i believed in planes until last week or something but i put 2 and 2 together. if there were no planes at the pentagon why would it be planes at the WTC?

    what makes you think there were planes?

    the witnesses?

    power of suggestion

    they saw shit on the TV and they remember it as real life, its a common effect with ppl who experience traumatic events.

    like rape victims and such

    the cops show them a picture of a rapist and the victim will remember that person to be that raped her even if his innocent

  • if there were no planes at the pentagon why would it be planes at the WTC?

    thats actually the wron question^^ the right question is, how can an airplane penetrate a building, build of steelbeams on the outside, designed TO WITHSTAND airplane impacts. and the simple answer is, it cant! newtons third law of motion explaines it all! i posted it in from an idiot 13 ... have fun guys!

  • Cleveland Cavs CHOKED! :)

    I still say there was NO planes on that day. Watch September Clues and keep your mind open broham.

  • nice

  • great video

  • The truth is what matters. Good video. At least you're trying to open people's eyes.

    9/11 was an inside job!

  • good stuff,

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more