Cyprus has some of this babes and they rock ... it serves two roles .. carry troops to the battlefield support tanks .. in this case we have t-80u and uk they rock too ..
@gOtze1337 Thicker armor to reduce weight is made of aluminum alloy (against bullets and lung shells) + active protection against cumulative and arrow type armor-piercing shells
@gOtze1337 Two guns in the tower: Rapid-fire 30mm against easy combat mashines and helicopters and 100mm against tanks and buildings, also can use for shoot a radio-directing rockets. Automatic grenade launcher type ballista on the top of tower controlled from the inside of the transporter 2 machine guns in the front part. 7 infantrymen inside
HURRR... GADDAM COMMIES AND DURRR GADDAM TANKS US IN AMURRRRICA SHOULDVE JUST NUKED YOO LIKE WE DONE DID THE JAPS!!!! In all seriousness though this is an awesome video! Is this Russia's main light tank? Or does it act solely as an apc?
@kekene719 If that's how the Americans are acting, then the Russians must be saying something like:
"I laugh at your bloated, decadent, and overweight American tanks! Like big fat stupid wasteful American pigs! Go eat another cheeseburger and get ass-fucked by George Bush like the wasteful capitalist bitches you are!"
But I digress. The BMP-3 is used as a fighting vehicle, like the American Bradley, not just as a personnel carrier. Though this is their main AFV, they utilize other models.
@1169Timothy You'd "prefer" it for what? Defending the M-COM station? I'd prefer a sick hovercraft as opposed to my modest Hyundai Sonata, but I don't see me in a position to need one, lol.
And the BTR-90 isn't comparable to the Bradley or BMP because they're in different categories.
@BasementBeginnings нет я думаю бредли не такой уж плохой бронеавтомобиль, дело даже не в дутых формах, американская армия намного превосходит нашу российскую в техническом вопросе, но у в вашей армии нет духа, мужества и любви к родине, вы не сможете сражаться на поле боя без лазеров и предаторов и биотуалетов.
@BasementBeginnings No, I think Bradley is not such a bad armored car, it's not the exaggerated forms, the U.S. military is far superior to our Russian technical issue, but in your army is not the spirit, courage and love of country, you can not fight on the battlefield without lasers and Predator and compost toilets.
@TheIPhon4 I'm not implying the Bradley is a bad vehicle, the Battlefield fanboy is.
And I have to agree there, lol. Even China knows America has been wasting way too much money on military, and investing on too much useless technology that won't ever be utilized.
But though America has the "superior" army at this time in terms of expenditure, manpower, and equipment, there's no doubt the Russians are much more devoted to their country.
i think if this went against a bradley, or a bradley went against the bmp, whoever gets the first attack will most likely win because the rounds they shoot are extremely powerful. but the thing is im sick of this hype of the bmp over the bradley... its like acting like everything american made somehow has to have someone be an asshole... when half the people that talk about it know nothing
@MrPelhambay Indeed, it's a matter of who strikes first, but the Bmp2/3 have a major advantage agains other armored vehicles. The ATGM doesn't need to be guided, you aim it, fire and forget, while in a bradley you need to be completely still and aim all the way and the tow is extremely slow, enemy tank will notice faster and just move behind some trees or something or just use IR blocking. Also the atgm haves a autoloader, what the bradley doesnt and can only fire 2 before rearmng.
@Aaidas2 - the bradley can actually shoot accurately on the move, remember it was designed to roll intocombat alongside the abrams which can shoot on the move so they needed to do the same with the bradley. even though the tow system is slow and man-guided, there is still the infantry squad in the back, each infantry squad carries anti tank weapons(at 4s, javelins) which are very affective. the bradley now has anti IR aim locking which means the IR shields many new tanks used are countered.
@MrPelhambay You think bmp3 can't carry infantry or that russians don't have similiar at weapons? And it needs to be completely stationary to guide the Tow, it's man guided, when moving it gets of aim, the tow is extremely slow by modern standarts aswell, tankers will easily spot it before it will hit them and destroy the bradley sooner that the tow reaches them. While the Bmp3 haves fire and forget atgms and a autoloader for them, with bradley you can fire only 2 and need to get out to rearm.
@Aaidas2 - i never said in couldnt carry infantry, i know it does, i just dont like that it seems cramped in the back. and yes you can fire a tow on the move, ive seen it done before, but thats why the bradley changed its technolgies over the years, same with the bmp3, they both changed their equitment to be better than their original.
@Aaidas2 - one thing about the bmp that i dont like is that the troop compartment in the back is really cramped and i fear that the soldiers in the back may be a bit shaken up after exiting. ive been in bradleys before and they are actually prretty open in the back, especially when your wearing 80 lbs of gear. however 2 things i like about the bmp is it isnt very tall, making it a smaller target, and the paint schemes the russians give the bmp are awesome XD
@NatedogJr You should ask the same question about any other apc in the world. It haves more armor and bigger gun than most apcs, is more efficient aswell and can mount reactive armor like kactus, kontact, relikt that are modern sabot/ he round proof... Just because it's Russian, doesn't mean its bad.
@Aaidas2 Well, then I could make an APC/IFV with better armor and more firepower than a BMP. I could use wheels instead of tracks since wheels are quieter, but for cross-country, I'll think of something else.
I'm not saying just because it is Russian, it's bad. I jut want the U.S to depend on themselves instead of depending on other countries to make thier own weapons.
@NatedogJr They aparently can't make a better apc... Russians have always rulled the apc scene, don't see it changing judging on the current apc's. The us does defend on itself, who said they use other country vehicles?
@Aaidas2 We have the Stryker, M2 Bradley, M113. I think those vechicles are fairly good. The M113 has many variants like an ambulance, mortar carrier, command center.... The Stryker is wheeled instead of tracked making it quieter. The M2 Bradley served in Gulf War and destroyed Iraqi tanks. All have good firepower and mobility. But that bad thing about it is that they can be hit with an RPG. The Stryker has cage armor that blows up the RPG before it hits the hull. Not vechicles, but weapons.
@arveduilastking What does armor mean anyway? Any infantry with a decent AT weapon will blow up an IFV like no problem. At least the BMP-3 has some real serious firepower.
@arveduilastking Well is you look at a stock BMP-3 you are right. But it is only fair to compare a stock BMP-3 with a stock Bradley, in which case the Bradley is vulnerable to anything bigger than 14.5mm API. Over the frontal arc, the BMP-3 has protection against 30mm AP from 300m away farther, so it is better. Both the BMP-3 and the Bradley have passive and active armour kits nowadays. Including jammers, ERA, and hard kill countermeasures, as well as slab armour or just more plating.
@gOtze1337 One more expert on armour. Koreans use some 70 BMP-3, and development of its own IFV led to K-21 with chassis of fiberglass (!). 26 tonns, but the K-21 armour can stop 14.5 mm bullets. What about 30-mm or 100-mm those of BMP-3? BTW BMP-3's front armour withstands 30-mm AT. As to found "best Korean way" quot "A board of inquiry in South Korea found that design defects were the cause of two new K21s (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) sinking while engaged in amphibious operations." end quot.
@XBC1000 ah, i didnt know that about the K21... thx.
i think the bmp3 is made for a real war, where u need mobillity and the puma is designed for operations like afghanistan were u need the armor against mines, IED´s, RPG´s etc. but ithink u can blow up a puma with a kornet/javelin. puma´s new gun which shoots airburst-Amo. can attack helicopter and i think it can penetrate every IFV.
btw. the bmp3 is armed like hell but i dont know if its good.
@gOtze1337 "u cant compare it with a bradley, puma, marder etc" . Indeed. Bradley, 33 t, is now more like light tank. Marder is nice but not amfibous and weighs 33 t too. Puma is just Panzer Unter Minimalem Aufwand - so it's tank, weights 43 t , more than russian MBT T-80, but has much less armour and gun.Can you drop any? Or use in amfi ops? BMP-3 used by infantry, marines and airborn, as It's been made for. And key words for IFV is mobility and firepower.
@TheDragonlegion I don't know about that, both are good IFV, Russian ones newer it fix some all the problems of BMP 1 and 2 but not add a few strange things for it self. The only draw back of the BMP-3 is the rear door you have to craw out over the engines, so wounded people tying to get in from the rear not so good, you craw in craw out from the rear. I think the main selling point of the BMP-3 is its weapons its packing and, low silhouette. BMP-3 half light tank half IFV,
BMP-3 would kill a M2 hands down because of its weapons it packing, BMP-3 fixed the problem of the older models, they added fire on the move for the turret moved the gas tanks from the rear door to a safe spot so a guy with an AK wont blow up the IFV from the rear and all tthat firepower is packing and all the tracking optic upgrades help it alot . The only thing i dislike about the BMP-3 rear door, the tanks not made for fast infantry dismount, but makes one bad ass infantry fire support.
My pick for true IFV is the Swedish CV90-C.......note gas tanks for BMP-3 are on the floor of the tank and into days war with IED everywhere oh shit for the BMP crews.... will same goes for the Bradley crews >_<..
@TheDragonlegion The bradley like some other IFV's use 2 TOW missiles which can crack open MBT's better then the 100mm cannon of the BMP-3. I will admit though, that the reload of them is much simpler and can still take out some older MBT's.
@MegaBuster777 BMP-3 Use guided rockets too, they are comparable to the TOW, the TOW migth be more powerfull than a 100 mm round, but the 100 mm rounds flies at way higher speeds, not saying it's better than the bradley, (cough! cough! thinner armor) but it anti-tank capabilites are undoubtoble.
@babehunter1324 You also have to understand that the bradley is an IFV and not a light tank. Not only that, but it's got add-ons like most vehicles do, and it's got more cargo room.
I was going to think that the Russians weren't going to make anything good. But, like in the space race, they suprised the world. It looks and sounds like a superb vehicle for it's class, in every way equal or better to it's western counterparts. As a westerner myself I don't usually expect much, but I'm thoroughly impressed with this vehicle. Well done, Russia.
My country is trying to get this lovely wonder, but the fucking American sanctions and arms embargo is holding us back. However, we will get it sooner or later.
@ticoxD The problem with most of the Soviet-built infantry transports are the soldiers prefer riding on top of them instead of inside because of the poor survivability issues.
@ComeAndSeevX I think the actual reason for riding on top is usually due to fear of landmines and riding outside allows troops to respond more quickly instead of wasting time dismounting. It has little to do with survivability IMO, and even American GIs back in Vietnam also did ride on top of the M113 for fear of landmines.
@ComeAndSeevX I think the paratroopers sit on top of BMP during the war in Afghanistan. Then they began to apply. Spooks ambushes on the mountain tops, over the top BMP is more vulnerable as any armored vehicle. That would reduce this advantage soldiers sit on top and it makes it easier to open fire on the enemy in case of an attack in the mountains. Besides designer in the video said that the BMP-3 is provided in the toilet and it can be 2 days on contaminated terrain.
Why are the people bitching about this APCs combat ability? Its not a fucking main battle tank for christs sake. Judge it on what it supposed to do. And it excels in it.
@kop4321 I'm not quite sure why they criticize it so heavily. It's a fine vehicle for what it was built to do (transport the infantry and give them additional firepower in the support of tanks). It could use some better protection and a better ATGM though in my opinion.
@oropios Firepower of this car above any similar western mechanism .- Marder, Bradley, Swedish CV-90. In addition, they will not withstand fire armor-piercing projectiles of 100 mm guns BMP at distances greater than 2 km. It is difficult to judge the state of tankers, when they will get fired complex "Reflex" or 9m117. I guess it will not be high.
@oropios This machine was created with the calculation that the infantry, which it transports can operate without tanks. And these actions will be successful. For example airborne troops, marine infantry. This car is great swims. It can throw off an airplane for the paratroopers and the crew.
Complex Arena - protection against missiles of all classes. Complex "blind" - the installation of optical interference, electronic noise. complex reactive armor protection from RPGs. Multifuel diesel in the stern.
This is a machine for airborne troops and tank divisions. She can swim. 8 rockets and 40 rounds of 100 mm guns. 500 rounds for the 30 mm cannon. 3 machine guns 7.62 mm. Weight: 18 tons. It can be 2 days on contaminated terrain. The machine has a toilet. Crew 3 persons. 10 paratroopers. Cruising speed - 600 km. Reservations against bullets and light shells.
Let's not forget that this vehicle is essentially just a recycle bin for surplus and obsolete 100mm ammunition. Its only effective weapon against other modern vehicles, is its missiles.
@SAsgarters You are not justified. Missiles are now part of the ammunition of 100 mm guns. There is no need to install the outer anti-missile systems outside the body. 100 mm gun brings a BMP to the tanks firepower.
@Imprudentman The 100 mm gun is comparable to a mortar of similar diameter, it does not "bring a BMP to a tank's firepower". It's completely pointless and a simple launch tube can be made both shorter and much lighter. The missiles it's able to launch are also severely limited by the 100 mm diameter of the gun and are fundamentally useless against modern tanks. Modern, effective missiles typically have diameters of 150 - 170 mm.
@SAsgarters You're right. Of course it is not 100 mm caliber modern tanks. But until recently this was the tank gauge. It seems to me an interesting plant of this caliber in the BMP. Obviously this was done by order of the military. I just voiced an opinion person comments this video..
@Imprudentman The muzzle velocity is 300 m/s. That's less than a third of the 100mm D10T gun (>1000m/s) that was used on the ancient T-54 and T-55, but far closer to the muzzle velocity of a mortar. The 100mm gun on the BMP-3 is not of any use against any armoured vehicles.
@SAsgarters 100mm gun can penetrate 30 cm sheet of armor at a distance of 1000 m at a distance of 28cm sheet of 2000 m old armor-piercing projectile. Of course it's not enough that would penetrate the armor of modern tanks, but that would be enough to pierce armor T-55 T-54.
@Imprudentman Armor piercing projectiles depend on their velocity to penetrate armour and 300m/s is not enough to even make a dent. If we're talking about HEAT rounds, that would be somewhat different, but the muzzle velocity is still too low to be useful. Longer flight times mean dramatically reduced hit probability.
@SAsgarters Armor-piercing shell has a higher rate. Because this ammo is easier to fragmentation high-explosive ammunition for the same power chuck. The war in Iraq showed that the Abrams tank has vulnerabilities such as auxiliary power unit. It is located on the outside and barely covered with armor. And it is in the tank which price reaches up to 4.3 -6 million dollars!
@SAsgarters 9M117 guided missile and the firing device ZUBK10M-1: Shooting range - 100-4000 m, the speed of a missile - 370 m / s, time of flight at maximum range - 13 sec, the mass of the rocket - 17,6 kg, shot - 22-28 kg, diameter - 100 mm, length - 1048 mm , The magnitude of stabilizers - 255 mm armor - 550-600 mm, the probability of hitting the target type of tank for maximum range - 0.8, temperature range combat use ------ 40 .. +50 ° C.
@SAsgarters Tank guided missile "Reflex" 9M119: Speedcarrier - up to 70 km / h, range shooting - 75-5000 meters, time of flight at maximum range - 14,2 c, the mass missile - 17,2 kg warhead - 4,5 kg, armor: 90 ° - 700 - 750 mm, the dynamic armor - 650-700 mm, the probability of hitting the target type of tank moving at 30 km / h - 0,8.
@SAsgarters I'm not trying to present the case so that the gun 2A70 has a speed of the projectile above the D-10T buddy. I just want to tell you that the BMP has a high firepower. And this car is a serious danger to modern tanks.
@Imprudentman I already told you about the limitations of the missile. It's not a danger to modern tanks. The armour penertation of the missile is about half of what's needed to make a hole in a post-1970's tank that relies on passive, non-reactive armour alone.
The firepower this vehicle has, is pathetic. The 30mm gun is insufficient against all modern IFVs, the 100mm gun is only useful against buildings and the missile is useless against everything except IFVs.
This vehicle is the successor to the Cold War. "She is a very powerful weapon. No fighting machine of this class, similar in strength. Except for the chinese Type 97, which was copied from the BMP-3, but has a different location offices, compared with a russian version. BMP -3 is a very good swimmer, but because of this it loses its protection, especially against mines. In the right hands is a very formidable machine, and has no equal in its class.
Skazochnik rasskazivaet pro ocherdnoe russkoe gavno BMP3 kotorii sdelan iz aluyminiya znachit gnilaya bronya,znachit bednie soldati umrut za tupuyu bezdarnost russkih konstruktorov.Zachem ei plavat? zachem v nei tualet? Esli boi v 99,9% idet na sushe! U nee net nikakih shansov protiv BRADLEY,CV90,PUMA a takzhe angliiskogo i uzhnokoreiskogo analogov.EE legko mozhno podbit,znachit ona ne nadezhna!Bezdarnie konstruktora,bezdarnie generali vot kto vinoven v smerti tisyach i tisyach soldatov!!!
@DSpirith Tak vot ya govoril v pervom komentarii kakie znamenitie SLUYHI russkie devki!Razehalis po vse miru predlagaya vsem poprobovat ih,DUBAY,LONDON ,EVROPA,AMERIKA povsuydu russkie shlyuhi i ti Eban eto znaehprekrasno ne udivitelno pochemu uvas v strane demograf.problema,vashi devki shlyuhi ne hotyat zamuzh ,ne hotyat rozhat,im krasivuyu zhizn podavai etim SHLYUHAM .Nu cho pravda glaza koli? tebe po suti nehui skazat.Est pretenzii? predyavi ih russkim devkam sprosi ih patriot ebanii! !!
@robroy904 Ты не ровняй всех девок по себе - мудак с россии только проститутки разъехались спидом вас заражать, все нормальные остались. Ваши сэры и лорды слюнтяи сопливые, и ты тоже. Тебя-бы в белоруссию пожить перевезти бы, посмотрел бы я как за двести баксов в месяц ты бы крутился, русские умеют выживать, а вы пидерасты нет, у вас в англии негров больше чем вас, и пидарюги на улицах, вот ваши защитники, гордись сука своей ницией, она ничтожна!!!
@DSpirith TVOYA mat FUCKING WHORE kak i vse russkie babi ved nnedarom ruskie devki samie znamenitie shlyuhi vseh vremen i narodov !Poetomu u vas demograf. problema v strane stoit i situazia ne uluchshitsya,potomuchto izmena i prostituziya u vas v krovi!Skoro vashu stranu zahvatit Kitai i vi budete ih rabami uzhe seichas vidno chto vi ne v sostoyanii sohranit svoyu teritoriyu vashe budushee v sostave Kitaya ,russkie tam budut vtorosortnimi,a vashi devki v tot moment brosyat vas,poedut ebatsya!!
Discription: You. your father, and maybe your brother, take your mom on a bed in dinning room and present her a great stuff. Like putting some shiz in her mouth or jerking somewhere. Geeeek.
Just look, 3 holes are enough for 3 persons.
Anyway back to the topic. I see how you rage on russian military, is there any Reason?
You know that there must be a reason to hate smth. Or just failtrolling?
@DSpirith Fuck off! ficking wranker,russian pig! YOU have not got any argument against i wrote here about your weapon,about russian whores,so chill down go and fuck your own sister anyway she is fucking whore and she has been fuckud up by all city or village where you live!! I'm angry cause russian idiots,bustards all the time boasting about their weapons.YOU have been fucked up by Germany and will be fucked up again by China.FUCK OFF !fucking mongolian idiot!!!
@robroy904 Walking on the dick. In his crap all over Europe. Want to enjoy all the benefits of civilization, and then pouring rain shit on the heads of those who gave them to you. Welcome to Chechnya. There's your head quickly demolished. Enough of the troll, sheep roundnose.
@robroy904 Откуда ты русско - язычная обезьяна нарисовалась в англии, наверное русские тебя пробросили нормально что ты переехал туда и так их не навидишь, и гонишь пургу всякую. Ты не еврей случаем? Вы там все жопу лижите королеве как в муравейнике, а ничего серьёзного из себя не представляете, чуть пошатнётся ваша экономика и рим номер два вам обеспечен. Как ваш юмор английский плоский, так и бабы ваши страшные, сам лично видел, в Лондоне неначто смотреть как только на достопримечательности.
@MsAllegator YA tebe bovanu i etomuDSPIRITHu glaza hotel otkrit chtob vi vse videli kakim gavnom polzuetsya vasha armia ya uzhe govoril chto vse tvoi BMP3 i AKULI i ALIGATORI vashi vertushki gavno iya obosnoval eto v kommentarii pro BMP3.Prosto ochen zadevaet vashe glupoe, ni na chem ne osnovannoe hvastovstvo i dibilizm.Vam mongolo-tataram NIKOGDA ne sozdat chto-to horoshee,konkurentnosposobnoe vi ponimaete tolko grubuyu silu!! Kak eto sdelala GERMANIA i ochen skoro sdelaet KITAI vam PIZDEZ!!
@robroy904 По твоим словам можно сделать много выводов, один из них то что ты не служил в (российской, белорусской) армии. Это говнотехника (как ты выразился) состоит во многих странах мира на вооружении. Россия это великая держава! Победили в первую мировую, вторую мировую, победим и в третью, пусть то будут китайцы или америкасосы. Соберёмся всем словянским народом и такой писды отгребёт любой нерусь, что мама не горюй!
@MsNikolai1983 Ti sam sebya ne obmanivai tolko kak eto luybyat delat vse russkie viskazivaniyami tipa rossia eto "derzhava" i v pervoi mirovoi i vo vtoroi vashu naivnuyu ,glupuyu krov prolili ZHIDI proluyt oni ee eshe ochen mnogo ,potomuchto russkie glupie,naivnie,hvastlivie,lenivie i prostodushnie kak 3 kopeiki(kstati revoluyziyu vam organizovali tozhe ZHIDI prolili vashu krovinku bezmozgluyu) rossiei upravlyali vsegda ZHIDI ,upravlyayut seichas i budut upravlyat! eto vashe proklyatie!!!
@MsNikolai1983 Tak vot vami slavyanami bolvanami upravlyat ochen legko eto vidno po tvoim viskazivaniam,ti uzhe ne verish v svouy rossiyu poetomu govorish vsem slavyanskim narodom,hohli i belorusi tochno za vas russkih voevat ne budut vi russkie slishkom mnogo ih predavali tak chto kitaizi PAArvut vashu zhopu na mnogo melkih pravoslavnih krestov!!!Vasha duma polna zhidov,vashe televidenie osobenno 1kanal ves sostoit iz zhidov v tom chisle i glava 1 kanala tam oni vas razvlekayut,obmanivayut ..
@MsNikolai1983 tak vot tam oni vas razvlekayut ,obmanivayut,zombituyut,poyat,i otpravlyauyt na voinu chtob vi sdohli kak svin'i posmotri kak lovko oni vami manipuliruyut vse razvlekatelnie programi i ih vedushie opyat ZHIDI,oligarhi zhidi i ruskie im zhopi lizhut!!!Esli prechislyat vseh vedushih ZHIDOV to mestA ne hvatit tut,oni skoro zahvatyat vsu Dumu polnostyu,vse tv polnostyu,pravitelstvo,banki ,yurispridenziyu kak oni iskusno eto sdelali vovseh drugih stranah i vam bezmozglim alkashamPizdez
многих - это самые нищие страны арфики (те что побогаче, за редким исключением, закупают технику у нато или редко у обоих), страны-изгои ака сев корея, буквально несколько стран лат америки и отдельные страны без большой роли в геополитике с пост совка, у которых выбор невелик. Так что бросай слушать окружающих и делай выводы только по той информации, что сам распологаешь
@gosciu555 No we didnt. The deal has actually been raised to 450. All it needs is the final agreement to be signed. But the greek politicians stall the process. Probably because they need to secure some funds under the table for their personal use. This is how Greece is bying military equipment from the west. I am Greek and i know how it works.
@BEANO266 Only recently we have discovered huge consentrations of natural gas in the area between Crete and Cyprus, in many locations in the aegean archipelago and in parts of the ionian sea. This is why we have been brought to our knees today (search the net for economic hitmans).
And this is the reason Turkey is pestering Greece so much.
And this is why we need those BMP. We do not want them for show, there is a really great possibility for us to use them for defece in an upcoming war
@NeutralNegotiator thats only maritime borders is it? russia and norway are sorting out theirs diplomatically so i'm sure greece and turkey willfollow suit
@BEANO266 that is because russia and norway are civilized and reasonable. Problem in my country is that turkey is a barbarian state, and greece is losing all traces of reasonability when comes to war. A greek BMP crew will think they can take out an entire turkish armored brigade...just because it is possible and they know it
Habe in meiner Dienstzeit den BMP1 Gefahren. Aber dieses Teil ist der Hammer!!!
7551aspire 2 weeks ago
Чтоб они сгорели как спички когда попадает РПГ
iopx23 4 weeks ago
I tihnk taht a russian tank is more dangerous for the crew as for the enemy
arma2able 1 month ago
@arma2able
... and I think that you are ignorant.
vtkrey 3 weeks ago
AHEAD would wreck thick with a few shots.
EIGHTYEIGHT3 1 month ago
Uhhh, I dont know about y'all but that mufflers gotta get in the way somewhere down the line
magnagaurd 1 month ago
the funny thing about this is that any at-4 aor shoulder fired antitank weapon can disable this if it is not equiped with reactive armor
USApowerMAN16 2 months ago
@USApowerMAN16 The funny thing is that the same applies for any IFV/APC
Sphynra 1 month ago
@Sphynra that is what im trying to say...
USApowerMAN16 1 month ago
@USApowerMAN16 find me a vehicle in it's class who will not be disabled .
TheKifinas 2 weeks ago
Cyprus has some of this babes and they rock ... it serves two roles .. carry troops to the battlefield support tanks .. in this case we have t-80u and uk they rock too ..
TheKifinas 2 months ago
*bmp-3=thinner armor
babehunter1324 2 months ago
if the brandley jumbed in lake like that it would sink like a rock
TheKifinas 2 months ago
BMP3 is not comparable with a bradley , bmp2=M2 bradley , but bmp3>>>>M2 bradley
Cableethernet33000 2 months ago
Awesome !!
armedziak 2 months ago
how thick is the rear top hatch on the BMP-3 seems like a weak spot
PSG1JOHN1 2 months ago
is the bmp3 better armored than bmp1/2 ?
gOtze1337 3 months ago
Comment removed
prototroxer 3 months ago
Comment removed
prototroxer 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gOtze1337 Thicker armor to reduce weight is made of aluminum alloy (against bullets and lung shells) + active protection against cumulative and arrow type armor-piercing shells
prototroxer 3 months ago
@gOtze1337 Two guns in the tower: Rapid-fire 30mm against easy combat mashines and helicopters and 100mm against tanks and buildings, also can use for shoot a radio-directing rockets. Automatic grenade launcher type ballista on the top of tower controlled from the inside of the transporter 2 machine guns in the front part. 7 infantrymen inside
prototroxer 3 months ago
@prototroxer i mean not the weapons, i mean the armor.
gOtze1337 3 months ago
@gOtze1337 About the armor I replied already! Look at the bottom of the page ;)
prototroxer 3 months ago
yeaa russian quality ive sitting on deck and haved drive one time
isobodari1 3 months ago
Mexicans.
Awgez24 3 months ago
Exelente video estos tanques pronto estaran en Venezuela...
ticoxD 4 months ago
just one thing missing -english subtitles
aGentleUser 4 months ago
и где в армии эти трешки?коснулось с грузинами дратса ведь ездили наши парни на стареньких бтр
MrBrriGG 5 months ago
HURRR... GADDAM COMMIES AND DURRR GADDAM TANKS US IN AMURRRRICA SHOULDVE JUST NUKED YOO LIKE WE DONE DID THE JAPS!!!! In all seriousness though this is an awesome video! Is this Russia's main light tank? Or does it act solely as an apc?
kekene719 5 months ago
@kekene719 If that's how the Americans are acting, then the Russians must be saying something like:
"I laugh at your bloated, decadent, and overweight American tanks! Like big fat stupid wasteful American pigs! Go eat another cheeseburger and get ass-fucked by George Bush like the wasteful capitalist bitches you are!"
But I digress. The BMP-3 is used as a fighting vehicle, like the American Bradley, not just as a personnel carrier. Though this is their main AFV, they utilize other models.
BasementBeginnings 4 months ago 9
@BasementBeginnings It is a good AFV too, but I have one problem with it. The Armour looks thin as fuck.
1169Timothy 1 month ago
@1169Timothy It's 5mm thicker than the Bradley's. :\
BasementBeginnings 1 month ago
@BasementBeginnings didn't say I like the Bradley either. I would prefer a BTR-90 with Reactive Armour all over it.
1169Timothy 1 month ago
@1169Timothy You'd "prefer" it for what? Defending the M-COM station? I'd prefer a sick hovercraft as opposed to my modest Hyundai Sonata, but I don't see me in a position to need one, lol.
And the BTR-90 isn't comparable to the Bradley or BMP because they're in different categories.
BasementBeginnings 2 weeks ago
@BasementBeginnings
That's not the point. I said I would prefer a BTR-90 over the two, that is all.
1169Timothy 2 weeks ago
@BasementBeginnings нет я думаю бредли не такой уж плохой бронеавтомобиль, дело даже не в дутых формах, американская армия намного превосходит нашу российскую в техническом вопросе, но у в вашей армии нет духа, мужества и любви к родине, вы не сможете сражаться на поле боя без лазеров и предаторов и биотуалетов.
TheIPhon4 2 weeks ago
@BasementBeginnings No, I think Bradley is not such a bad armored car, it's not the exaggerated forms, the U.S. military is far superior to our Russian technical issue, but in your army is not the spirit, courage and love of country, you can not fight on the battlefield without lasers and Predator and compost toilets.
TheIPhon4 2 weeks ago
@TheIPhon4 I'm not implying the Bradley is a bad vehicle, the Battlefield fanboy is.
And I have to agree there, lol. Even China knows America has been wasting way too much money on military, and investing on too much useless technology that won't ever be utilized.
But though America has the "superior" army at this time in terms of expenditure, manpower, and equipment, there's no doubt the Russians are much more devoted to their country.
BasementBeginnings 2 weeks ago
@kekene719 it military secret ;)
rfrfification 2 months ago
РУССКОЕ ОРУЖИЕ!!!!!
MultiTerminator1990 6 months ago
/watch?v=f3LB_oyfzzQ - This video with english subtitles
BitnikGr 6 months ago
YA RAD SHTO MOYA STRANA ARMENIA KUPILA IMENNO ETI MASHINI A NE FRANCUZKIYE!
MegaDAJAN 6 months ago
2: BMP 1´o Clock !
1: 3 Enagage that BMP
3: BMP is History !
chabi3000 6 months ago
@chabi3000 flip bmp for bradley and get a more realistic scenario
NosferatuAaacaado 6 months ago
@chabi3000
1: Брэдли в 2 часа
2: Атака, что Брэдли
3: Брэдли истории
haghaghaghaag 5 months ago
I can haz for Christmas?
WonkyTonkBotty 6 months ago
РОССИЯ ВПЕРЁД!
karapooz1 6 months ago
i think if this went against a bradley, or a bradley went against the bmp, whoever gets the first attack will most likely win because the rounds they shoot are extremely powerful. but the thing is im sick of this hype of the bmp over the bradley... its like acting like everything american made somehow has to have someone be an asshole... when half the people that talk about it know nothing
MrPelhambay 6 months ago
@MrPelhambay Indeed, it's a matter of who strikes first, but the Bmp2/3 have a major advantage agains other armored vehicles. The ATGM doesn't need to be guided, you aim it, fire and forget, while in a bradley you need to be completely still and aim all the way and the tow is extremely slow, enemy tank will notice faster and just move behind some trees or something or just use IR blocking. Also the atgm haves a autoloader, what the bradley doesnt and can only fire 2 before rearmng.
Aaidas2 6 months ago
@Aaidas2 - the bradley can actually shoot accurately on the move, remember it was designed to roll intocombat alongside the abrams which can shoot on the move so they needed to do the same with the bradley. even though the tow system is slow and man-guided, there is still the infantry squad in the back, each infantry squad carries anti tank weapons(at 4s, javelins) which are very affective. the bradley now has anti IR aim locking which means the IR shields many new tanks used are countered.
MrPelhambay 6 months ago
@MrPelhambay You think bmp3 can't carry infantry or that russians don't have similiar at weapons? And it needs to be completely stationary to guide the Tow, it's man guided, when moving it gets of aim, the tow is extremely slow by modern standarts aswell, tankers will easily spot it before it will hit them and destroy the bradley sooner that the tow reaches them. While the Bmp3 haves fire and forget atgms and a autoloader for them, with bradley you can fire only 2 and need to get out to rearm.
Aaidas2 6 months ago
@Aaidas2 - i never said in couldnt carry infantry, i know it does, i just dont like that it seems cramped in the back. and yes you can fire a tow on the move, ive seen it done before, but thats why the bradley changed its technolgies over the years, same with the bmp3, they both changed their equitment to be better than their original.
MrPelhambay 6 months ago
@Aaidas2 - one thing about the bmp that i dont like is that the troop compartment in the back is really cramped and i fear that the soldiers in the back may be a bit shaken up after exiting. ive been in bradleys before and they are actually prretty open in the back, especially when your wearing 80 lbs of gear. however 2 things i like about the bmp is it isnt very tall, making it a smaller target, and the paint schemes the russians give the bmp are awesome XD
MrPelhambay 6 months ago
@MrPelhambay True dat.
Aaidas2 6 months ago
@Aaidas2 Russia doesn't even have a single fire-forgot missile, sir, the only APC with susch option would be Stryker if fitted with Jawelin.
ORKSIZDABEST 3 months ago
@ORKSIZDABEST Get your facts straight before making afool out of yourself.
Aaidas2 3 months ago
@Aaidas2 But I do. BMP-2,-3 both have laser guided missiles.
ORKSIZDABEST 3 months ago
can i pay monthly?
PILUPACKSXXX 6 months ago
Yess-yess, i drive this when im in Hungarian army!
Maybee its new wersion.
SariAttila21 6 months ago
Yess-yess, i driv this when im in Hungarian army!
SariAttila21 6 months ago
the profile alone makes it the best IFV in the world
Ba11s11 7 months ago
I rather build something from scratch instead of using this vechicle. I'm not saying it bad about it, but I just rather use something else.
NatedogJr 7 months ago
@NatedogJr Ur making a big mistake then.
Aaidas2 7 months ago
@Aaidas2 Can't an AT4 round or a RPG destroy this vechicle like an RPG destroy a Humvee? How is this vechicle any better?
NatedogJr 7 months ago
@NatedogJr You should ask the same question about any other apc in the world. It haves more armor and bigger gun than most apcs, is more efficient aswell and can mount reactive armor like kactus, kontact, relikt that are modern sabot/ he round proof... Just because it's Russian, doesn't mean its bad.
Aaidas2 7 months ago
@Aaidas2 Well, then I could make an APC/IFV with better armor and more firepower than a BMP. I could use wheels instead of tracks since wheels are quieter, but for cross-country, I'll think of something else.
I'm not saying just because it is Russian, it's bad. I jut want the U.S to depend on themselves instead of depending on other countries to make thier own weapons.
NatedogJr 7 months ago
@NatedogJr They aparently can't make a better apc... Russians have always rulled the apc scene, don't see it changing judging on the current apc's. The us does defend on itself, who said they use other country vehicles?
Aaidas2 7 months ago
@Aaidas2 We have the Stryker, M2 Bradley, M113. I think those vechicles are fairly good. The M113 has many variants like an ambulance, mortar carrier, command center.... The Stryker is wheeled instead of tracked making it quieter. The M2 Bradley served in Gulf War and destroyed Iraqi tanks. All have good firepower and mobility. But that bad thing about it is that they can be hit with an RPG. The Stryker has cage armor that blows up the RPG before it hits the hull. Not vechicles, but weapons.
NatedogJr 7 months ago
I'd rather have our forces using the BMP-3 than the M2 Bradley.
TheDragonlegion 8 months ago 34
@TheDragonlegion The Bradley has better armor, but thats about it.
arveduilastking 6 months ago
@arveduilastking What does armor mean anyway? Any infantry with a decent AT weapon will blow up an IFV like no problem. At least the BMP-3 has some real serious firepower.
haghaghaghaag 5 months ago
@arveduilastking Well is you look at a stock BMP-3 you are right. But it is only fair to compare a stock BMP-3 with a stock Bradley, in which case the Bradley is vulnerable to anything bigger than 14.5mm API. Over the frontal arc, the BMP-3 has protection against 30mm AP from 300m away farther, so it is better. Both the BMP-3 and the Bradley have passive and active armour kits nowadays. Including jammers, ERA, and hard kill countermeasures, as well as slab armour or just more plating.
SoulsStealerMalti 5 months ago
@TheDragonlegion Less armour, bigger gun, faster and cheaper i think, but less tec and
lordofdarkdudes 5 months ago
@TheDragonlegion BMP is much easier to blow up.
grawling 3 months ago
@grawling russain´s a proud of the firepower of th bmp3 and its the best ifv, but the armor is realy cheap... because its amphibious.
bmp3 is a good tank/ifv but u cant compare it with a bradley, puma, marder etc.
i think the korean´s(K21) have found the best way to combine mobillity(amphibious) with good armor.
gOtze1337 3 months ago
@gOtze1337 One more expert on armour. Koreans use some 70 BMP-3, and development of its own IFV led to K-21 with chassis of fiberglass (!). 26 tonns, but the K-21 armour can stop 14.5 mm bullets. What about 30-mm or 100-mm those of BMP-3? BTW BMP-3's front armour withstands 30-mm AT. As to found "best Korean way" quot "A board of inquiry in South Korea found that design defects were the cause of two new K21s (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) sinking while engaged in amphibious operations." end quot.
XBC1000 3 months ago
@XBC1000 ah, i didnt know that about the K21... thx.
i think the bmp3 is made for a real war, where u need mobillity and the puma is designed for operations like afghanistan were u need the armor against mines, IED´s, RPG´s etc. but ithink u can blow up a puma with a kornet/javelin. puma´s new gun which shoots airburst-Amo. can attack helicopter and i think it can penetrate every IFV.
btw. the bmp3 is armed like hell but i dont know if its good.
gOtze1337 3 months ago
@gOtze1337 "u cant compare it with a bradley, puma, marder etc" . Indeed. Bradley, 33 t, is now more like light tank. Marder is nice but not amfibous and weighs 33 t too. Puma is just Panzer Unter Minimalem Aufwand - so it's tank, weights 43 t , more than russian MBT T-80, but has much less armour and gun.Can you drop any? Or use in amfi ops? BMP-3 used by infantry, marines and airborn, as It's been made for. And key words for IFV is mobility and firepower.
XBC1000 3 months ago
@TheDragonlegion yeah thats because you guys suffer self-defeating personality disorder
ViennasNachos 3 months ago
@TheDragonlegion I don't know about that, both are good IFV, Russian ones newer it fix some all the problems of BMP 1 and 2 but not add a few strange things for it self. The only draw back of the BMP-3 is the rear door you have to craw out over the engines, so wounded people tying to get in from the rear not so good, you craw in craw out from the rear. I think the main selling point of the BMP-3 is its weapons its packing and, low silhouette. BMP-3 half light tank half IFV,
PSG1JOHN1 2 months ago
BMP-3 would kill a M2 hands down because of its weapons it packing, BMP-3 fixed the problem of the older models, they added fire on the move for the turret moved the gas tanks from the rear door to a safe spot so a guy with an AK wont blow up the IFV from the rear and all tthat firepower is packing and all the tracking optic upgrades help it alot . The only thing i dislike about the BMP-3 rear door, the tanks not made for fast infantry dismount, but makes one bad ass infantry fire support.
PSG1JOHN1 2 months ago
My pick for true IFV is the Swedish CV90-C.......note gas tanks for BMP-3 are on the floor of the tank and into days war with IED everywhere oh shit for the BMP crews.... will same goes for the Bradley crews >_<..
PSG1JOHN1 2 months ago
@TheDragonlegion The bradley like some other IFV's use 2 TOW missiles which can crack open MBT's better then the 100mm cannon of the BMP-3. I will admit though, that the reload of them is much simpler and can still take out some older MBT's.
MegaBuster777 2 months ago
@MegaBuster777 BMP-3 Use guided rockets too, they are comparable to the TOW, the TOW migth be more powerfull than a 100 mm round, but the 100 mm rounds flies at way higher speeds, not saying it's better than the bradley, (cough! cough! thinner armor) but it anti-tank capabilites are undoubtoble.
babehunter1324 2 months ago
@babehunter1324 You also have to understand that the bradley is an IFV and not a light tank. Not only that, but it's got add-ons like most vehicles do, and it's got more cargo room.
MegaBuster777 2 months ago
I was going to think that the Russians weren't going to make anything good. But, like in the space race, they suprised the world. It looks and sounds like a superb vehicle for it's class, in every way equal or better to it's western counterparts. As a westerner myself I don't usually expect much, but I'm thoroughly impressed with this vehicle. Well done, Russia.
TheDragonlegion 8 months ago
My country is trying to get this lovely wonder, but the fucking American sanctions and arms embargo is holding us back. However, we will get it sooner or later.
spearhead8585 8 months ago
Pronto llegaran a Venezuela!
ticoxD 8 months ago
@ticoxD The problem with most of the Soviet-built infantry transports are the soldiers prefer riding on top of them instead of inside because of the poor survivability issues.
ComeAndSeevX 8 months ago
@ComeAndSeevX I think the actual reason for riding on top is usually due to fear of landmines and riding outside allows troops to respond more quickly instead of wasting time dismounting. It has little to do with survivability IMO, and even American GIs back in Vietnam also did ride on top of the M113 for fear of landmines.
orcdta 8 months ago
@ComeAndSeevX I think the paratroopers sit on top of BMP during the war in Afghanistan. Then they began to apply. Spooks ambushes on the mountain tops, over the top BMP is more vulnerable as any armored vehicle. That would reduce this advantage soldiers sit on top and it makes it easier to open fire on the enemy in case of an attack in the mountains. Besides designer in the video said that the BMP-3 is provided in the toilet and it can be 2 days on contaminated terrain.
Imprudentman 8 months ago
Why are the people bitching about this APCs combat ability? Its not a fucking main battle tank for christs sake. Judge it on what it supposed to do. And it excels in it.
kop4321 9 months ago
@kop4321 I'm not quite sure why they criticize it so heavily. It's a fine vehicle for what it was built to do (transport the infantry and give them additional firepower in the support of tanks). It could use some better protection and a better ATGM though in my opinion.
catherinewayneisajew 8 months ago
ruskiya vsegda yebut po vsem urovnyem....
kavkaz4401 9 months ago
наши как всегда нихрена не закупили
separatniymir 9 months ago
GREECE is going to talk,for the buy of these
however,they are not as good as they show.
Emirates,were not so satisfied of their chose..
things need to be,and i think,russians must coropoerate
with Greeks,for the tank.
oropios 9 months ago
@oropios Firepower of this car above any similar western mechanism .- Marder, Bradley, Swedish CV-90. In addition, they will not withstand fire armor-piercing projectiles of 100 mm guns BMP at distances greater than 2 km. It is difficult to judge the state of tankers, when they will get fired complex "Reflex" or 9m117. I guess it will not be high.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@oropios This machine was created with the calculation that the infantry, which it transports can operate without tanks. And these actions will be successful. For example airborne troops, marine infantry. This car is great swims. It can throw off an airplane for the paratroopers and the crew.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
In addition, they can carry anti-aircraft complex Boom, mounted grenade launchers.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
Complex Arena - protection against missiles of all classes. Complex "blind" - the installation of optical interference, electronic noise. complex reactive armor protection from RPGs. Multifuel diesel in the stern.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
This is a machine for airborne troops and tank divisions. She can swim. 8 rockets and 40 rounds of 100 mm guns. 500 rounds for the 30 mm cannon. 3 machine guns 7.62 mm. Weight: 18 tons. It can be 2 days on contaminated terrain. The machine has a toilet. Crew 3 persons. 10 paratroopers. Cruising speed - 600 km. Reservations against bullets and light shells.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
Comment removed
Imprudentman 9 months ago
Every IFV should have something that pushes the infantry out, to make them get out faster. :P
Robloxsaltytaco1234 9 months ago
how mutch this cost..?
Brcko4s 10 months ago
The left headlight is out! They failed to PMCS their vehicle!
SpetsnazZenya 10 months ago
nice wapen.
Iranianoilbourse 10 months ago
1:25 And who closes the door? Total lack of culture.
krbosak 10 months ago
@krbosak It opens and closes automatically...
999cheetos999 10 months ago
Let's not forget that this vehicle is essentially just a recycle bin for surplus and obsolete 100mm ammunition. Its only effective weapon against other modern vehicles, is its missiles.
SAsgarters 10 months ago
@SAsgarters You are not justified. Missiles are now part of the ammunition of 100 mm guns. There is no need to install the outer anti-missile systems outside the body. 100 mm gun brings a BMP to the tanks firepower.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman The 100 mm gun is comparable to a mortar of similar diameter, it does not "bring a BMP to a tank's firepower". It's completely pointless and a simple launch tube can be made both shorter and much lighter. The missiles it's able to launch are also severely limited by the 100 mm diameter of the gun and are fundamentally useless against modern tanks. Modern, effective missiles typically have diameters of 150 - 170 mm.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
Comment removed
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@SAsgarters You're right. Of course it is not 100 mm caliber modern tanks. But until recently this was the tank gauge. It seems to me an interesting plant of this caliber in the BMP. Obviously this was done by order of the military. I just voiced an opinion person comments this video..
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman The muzzle velocity is 300 m/s. That's less than a third of the 100mm D10T gun (>1000m/s) that was used on the ancient T-54 and T-55, but far closer to the muzzle velocity of a mortar. The 100mm gun on the BMP-3 is not of any use against any armoured vehicles.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
@SAsgarters 100mm gun can penetrate 30 cm sheet of armor at a distance of 1000 m at a distance of 28cm sheet of 2000 m old armor-piercing projectile. Of course it's not enough that would penetrate the armor of modern tanks, but that would be enough to pierce armor T-55 T-54.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman Armor piercing projectiles depend on their velocity to penetrate armour and 300m/s is not enough to even make a dent. If we're talking about HEAT rounds, that would be somewhat different, but the muzzle velocity is still too low to be useful. Longer flight times mean dramatically reduced hit probability.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
@SAsgarters Armor-piercing shell has a higher rate. Because this ammo is easier to fragmentation high-explosive ammunition for the same power chuck. The war in Iraq showed that the Abrams tank has vulnerabilities such as auxiliary power unit. It is located on the outside and barely covered with armor. And it is in the tank which price reaches up to 4.3 -6 million dollars!
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman You are wrong. Factually incorrect. The 2A70 is not comparable to the D10 in any way.
By the way, it's getting really difficult to understand what you're trying to say.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
@SAsgarters 9M117 guided missile and the firing device ZUBK10M-1: Shooting range - 100-4000 m, the speed of a missile - 370 m / s, time of flight at maximum range - 13 sec, the mass of the rocket - 17,6 kg, shot - 22-28 kg, diameter - 100 mm, length - 1048 mm , The magnitude of stabilizers - 255 mm armor - 550-600 mm, the probability of hitting the target type of tank for maximum range - 0.8, temperature range combat use ------ 40 .. +50 ° C.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@SAsgarters Tank guided missile "Reflex" 9M119: Speedcarrier - up to 70 km / h, range shooting - 75-5000 meters, time of flight at maximum range - 14,2 c, the mass missile - 17,2 kg warhead - 4,5 kg, armor: 90 ° - 700 - 750 mm, the dynamic armor - 650-700 mm, the probability of hitting the target type of tank moving at 30 km / h - 0,8.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman And that's relevant to the discussion, because...?
SAsgarters 9 months ago
@SAsgarters Because the BMP can be equipped with these systems. As 9m117 missile weapons is nominal of BMP-3.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@SAsgarters I'm not trying to present the case so that the gun 2A70 has a speed of the projectile above the D-10T buddy. I just want to tell you that the BMP has a high firepower. And this car is a serious danger to modern tanks.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman I already told you about the limitations of the missile. It's not a danger to modern tanks. The armour penertation of the missile is about half of what's needed to make a hole in a post-1970's tank that relies on passive, non-reactive armour alone.
The firepower this vehicle has, is pathetic. The 30mm gun is insufficient against all modern IFVs, the 100mm gun is only useful against buildings and the missile is useless against everything except IFVs.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
@SAsgarters This is not a danger to modern tanks ... Well. In any case, thanks for the discussion.
Imprudentman 9 months ago
@Imprudentman Likewise.
SAsgarters 9 months ago
Comment removed
Imprudentman 9 months ago
it looks it swin better than bredly
QQ20034 11 months ago
This vehicle is the successor to the Cold War. "She is a very powerful weapon. No fighting machine of this class, similar in strength. Except for the chinese Type 97, which was copied from the BMP-3, but has a different location offices, compared with a russian version. BMP -3 is a very good swimmer, but because of this it loses its protection, especially against mines. In the right hands is a very formidable machine, and has no equal in its class.
150izapit 11 months ago
this is a cool vehicle, but with the flat bottom its not IED proof.
strongdiddy 11 months ago
Skazochnik rasskazivaet pro ocherdnoe russkoe gavno BMP3 kotorii sdelan iz aluyminiya znachit gnilaya bronya,znachit bednie soldati umrut za tupuyu bezdarnost russkih konstruktorov.Zachem ei plavat? zachem v nei tualet? Esli boi v 99,9% idet na sushe! U nee net nikakih shansov protiv BRADLEY,CV90,PUMA a takzhe angliiskogo i uzhnokoreiskogo analogov.EE legko mozhno podbit,znachit ona ne nadezhna!Bezdarnie konstruktora,bezdarnie generali vot kto vinoven v smerti tisyach i tisyach soldatov!!!
robroy904 11 months ago
@robroy904
Your mother is govno.
DSpirith 11 months ago
@DSpirith Tak vot ya govoril v pervom komentarii kakie znamenitie SLUYHI russkie devki!Razehalis po vse miru predlagaya vsem poprobovat ih,DUBAY,LONDON ,EVROPA,AMERIKA povsuydu russkie shlyuhi i ti Eban eto znaehprekrasno ne udivitelno pochemu uvas v strane demograf.problema,vashi devki shlyuhi ne hotyat zamuzh ,ne hotyat rozhat,im krasivuyu zhizn podavai etim SHLYUHAM .Nu cho pravda glaza koli? tebe po suti nehui skazat.Est pretenzii? predyavi ih russkim devkam sprosi ih patriot ebanii! !!
robroy904 11 months ago
@robroy904 Ты не ровняй всех девок по себе - мудак с россии только проститутки разъехались спидом вас заражать, все нормальные остались. Ваши сэры и лорды слюнтяи сопливые, и ты тоже. Тебя-бы в белоруссию пожить перевезти бы, посмотрел бы я как за двести баксов в месяц ты бы крутился, русские умеют выживать, а вы пидерасты нет, у вас в англии негров больше чем вас, и пидарюги на улицах, вот ваши защитники, гордись сука своей ницией, она ничтожна!!!
MsNikolai1983 4 months ago
@DSpirith TVOYA mat FUCKING WHORE kak i vse russkie babi ved nnedarom ruskie devki samie znamenitie shlyuhi vseh vremen i narodov !Poetomu u vas demograf. problema v strane stoit i situazia ne uluchshitsya,potomuchto izmena i prostituziya u vas v krovi!Skoro vashu stranu zahvatit Kitai i vi budete ih rabami uzhe seichas vidno chto vi ne v sostoyanii sohranit svoyu teritoriyu vashe budushee v sostave Kitaya ,russkie tam budut vtorosortnimi,a vashi devki v tot moment brosyat vas,poedut ebatsya!!
robroy904 11 months ago
@robroy904
LAWL i made you so ragey rage.
How about to invite your mom on a family party?
Discription: You. your father, and maybe your brother, take your mom on a bed in dinning room and present her a great stuff. Like putting some shiz in her mouth or jerking somewhere. Geeeek.
Just look, 3 holes are enough for 3 persons.
Anyway back to the topic. I see how you rage on russian military, is there any Reason?
You know that there must be a reason to hate smth. Or just failtrolling?
DSpirith 11 months ago
@DSpirith Fuck off! ficking wranker,russian pig! YOU have not got any argument against i wrote here about your weapon,about russian whores,so chill down go and fuck your own sister anyway she is fucking whore and she has been fuckud up by all city or village where you live!! I'm angry cause russian idiots,bustards all the time boasting about their weapons.YOU have been fucked up by Germany and will be fucked up again by China.FUCK OFF !fucking mongolian idiot!!!
robroy904 11 months ago
@robroy904
TROLOLO
Trolling you makes so much fun.
Btw your mom is still podstilka for the door enterance.
DSpirith 11 months ago
@robroy904
Your mom is mongolian idiot..
DSpirith 11 months ago
@robroy904 Walking on the dick. In his crap all over Europe. Want to enjoy all the benefits of civilization, and then pouring rain shit on the heads of those who gave them to you. Welcome to Chechnya. There's your head quickly demolished. Enough of the troll, sheep roundnose.
150izapit 11 months ago
@robroy904 Откуда ты русско - язычная обезьяна нарисовалась в англии, наверное русские тебя пробросили нормально что ты переехал туда и так их не навидишь, и гонишь пургу всякую. Ты не еврей случаем? Вы там все жопу лижите королеве как в муравейнике, а ничего серьёзного из себя не представляете, чуть пошатнётся ваша экономика и рим номер два вам обеспечен. Как ваш юмор английский плоский, так и бабы ваши страшные, сам лично видел, в Лондоне неначто смотреть как только на достопримечательности.
MsNikolai1983 4 months ago
@robroy904 твоё BRADLTY и PUMA отстой полный да и как ты..ну ты дятел мало ли маош брасок ты дурак
MsAllegator 11 months ago
@MsAllegator YA tebe bovanu i etomuDSPIRITHu glaza hotel otkrit chtob vi vse videli kakim gavnom polzuetsya vasha armia ya uzhe govoril chto vse tvoi BMP3 i AKULI i ALIGATORI vashi vertushki gavno iya obosnoval eto v kommentarii pro BMP3.Prosto ochen zadevaet vashe glupoe, ni na chem ne osnovannoe hvastovstvo i dibilizm.Vam mongolo-tataram NIKOGDA ne sozdat chto-to horoshee,konkurentnosposobnoe vi ponimaete tolko grubuyu silu!! Kak eto sdelala GERMANIA i ochen skoro sdelaet KITAI vam PIZDEZ!!
robroy904 11 months ago
@robroy904 По твоим словам можно сделать много выводов, один из них то что ты не служил в (российской, белорусской) армии. Это говнотехника (как ты выразился) состоит во многих странах мира на вооружении. Россия это великая держава! Победили в первую мировую, вторую мировую, победим и в третью, пусть то будут китайцы или америкасосы. Соберёмся всем словянским народом и такой писды отгребёт любой нерусь, что мама не горюй!
MsNikolai1983 6 months ago 27
@MsNikolai1983 Ti sam sebya ne obmanivai tolko kak eto luybyat delat vse russkie viskazivaniyami tipa rossia eto "derzhava" i v pervoi mirovoi i vo vtoroi vashu naivnuyu ,glupuyu krov prolili ZHIDI proluyt oni ee eshe ochen mnogo ,potomuchto russkie glupie,naivnie,hvastlivie,lenivie i prostodushnie kak 3 kopeiki(kstati revoluyziyu vam organizovali tozhe ZHIDI prolili vashu krovinku bezmozgluyu) rossiei upravlyali vsegda ZHIDI ,upravlyayut seichas i budut upravlyat! eto vashe proklyatie!!!
robroy904 6 months ago
@MsNikolai1983 Tak vot vami slavyanami bolvanami upravlyat ochen legko eto vidno po tvoim viskazivaniam,ti uzhe ne verish v svouy rossiyu poetomu govorish vsem slavyanskim narodom,hohli i belorusi tochno za vas russkih voevat ne budut vi russkie slishkom mnogo ih predavali tak chto kitaizi PAArvut vashu zhopu na mnogo melkih pravoslavnih krestov!!!Vasha duma polna zhidov,vashe televidenie osobenno 1kanal ves sostoit iz zhidov v tom chisle i glava 1 kanala tam oni vas razvlekayut,obmanivayut ..
robroy904 6 months ago
@MsNikolai1983 tak vot tam oni vas razvlekayut ,obmanivayut,zombituyut,poyat,i otpravlyauyt na voinu chtob vi sdohli kak svin'i posmotri kak lovko oni vami manipuliruyut vse razvlekatelnie programi i ih vedushie opyat ZHIDI,oligarhi zhidi i ruskie im zhopi lizhut!!!Esli prechislyat vseh vedushih ZHIDOV to mestA ne hvatit tut,oni skoro zahvatyat vsu Dumu polnostyu,vse tv polnostyu,pravitelstvo,banki ,yurispridenziyu kak oni iskusno eto sdelali vovseh drugih stranah i vam bezmozglim alkashamPizdez
robroy904 6 months ago
@MsNikolai1983
многих - это самые нищие страны арфики (те что побогаче, за редким исключением, закупают технику у нато или редко у обоих), страны-изгои ака сев корея, буквально несколько стран лат америки и отдельные страны без большой роли в геополитике с пост совка, у которых выбор невелик. Так что бросай слушать окружающих и делай выводы только по той информации, что сам распологаешь
lolshtoo 4 months ago
@MsNikolai1983 Какой ты наивный. Хорошо, конечно, видеть так настроенных людей, но в реальности все, увы, ой как хуево.
ghos7bear 4 months ago
@ghos7bear Знаю.
MsNikolai1983 4 months ago
Ага, скоро америкосы в хаммер не будут влазить :D
PROwhiskas 11 months ago
bradly is the best.
quadcatfly 11 months ago
@quadcatfly
It is ok,depends on which model though, too many of them are overweight these days.
Sismiques 11 months ago
@quadcatfly
They're just different.
The dude said, the Bradley is heavier, slower, cannot swim, but is more armored
Abanamat85 11 months ago
@Abanamat85
The A) Bradley can swim, but not much else.
Sismiques 11 months ago
A0
Sismiques 10 months ago
cool ill take 300 of them
SoCal762 1 year ago 12
is it heavy？
lkyfly0047 1 year ago
@lkyfly0047
No 18 tons.
gosciu555 1 year ago
@gosciu555 .7 ;) you forgot some parts some where xD, hopfuly its not importent
5T34LTHcamoT4NK 11 months ago
@5T34LTHcamoT4NK
???
gosciu555 11 months ago
@gosciu555 you forgot .7 tones some wear, it 18.7 tones
5T34LTHcamoT4NK 11 months ago
@5T34LTHcamoT4NK
Depends on how fat or not the crew is ;)
gosciu555 11 months ago
@gosciu555 lol xDD nice one
5T34LTHcamoT4NK 11 months ago
the armor is too thin because they want to make it Amphibious. be damn with amphibious and put more armor on it.
phadil 1 year ago
Great Russian fighting machine!
dumitrescusa 1 year ago
A very nice machine!
FelixDzerzhinsky 1 year ago
Greece has bought 400 of these beauties!!!!
NeutralNegotiator 1 year ago 24
@NeutralNegotiator
I think they backed out actually.
gosciu555 1 year ago
@gosciu555 No we didnt. The deal has actually been raised to 450. All it needs is the final agreement to be signed. But the greek politicians stall the process. Probably because they need to secure some funds under the table for their personal use. This is how Greece is bying military equipment from the west. I am Greek and i know how it works.
NeutralNegotiator 1 year ago
@NeutralNegotiator wher will the funds come from, i know greece has heavy debt,where will they get money to buy them
BEANO266 11 months ago
@BEANO266 Only recently we have discovered huge consentrations of natural gas in the area between Crete and Cyprus, in many locations in the aegean archipelago and in parts of the ionian sea. This is why we have been brought to our knees today (search the net for economic hitmans).
And this is the reason Turkey is pestering Greece so much.
And this is why we need those BMP. We do not want them for show, there is a really great possibility for us to use them for defece in an upcoming war
NeutralNegotiator 11 months ago
@NeutralNegotiator thats only maritime borders is it? russia and norway are sorting out theirs diplomatically so i'm sure greece and turkey willfollow suit
BEANO266 11 months ago
@BEANO266 that is because russia and norway are civilized and reasonable. Problem in my country is that turkey is a barbarian state, and greece is losing all traces of reasonability when comes to war. A greek BMP crew will think they can take out an entire turkish armored brigade...just because it is possible and they know it
NeutralNegotiator 11 months ago