Added: 4 years ago
From: RobbieWright
Views: 82,199
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (390)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • without this weapons no one from the bitch soldiers can path falouja why you dont enter the city by tanks ana soldiers or air forces if u are strong ha ha ha in war the most impotant is honor and u dont have honor because how killing people by superweapon losy his honor

  • Its a screening agent. That is what it was designed for, and how it is being used. This was at the beginning of the operation where forces were moving into the city, and it was used on the outskirts. Wasn't dropped on anyone. But don't let the truth stop you...

  • It's like the 4th of July for sadistic perverts. What an utter disgrace this once great country has become.

  • nasty. 

  • WILLLLYYY PPPEEETTTEE!!

  • burning at over 4,000 C for all you metric minded grunts

    

  • i am field artillery i love wp rounds

  • In a real fight there are no rules.

  • Fucking disgusting. I'm sick to be American.

  • FALLUJA: IL TRIANGOLO OSE' E' CIA OPERAZIONI WILMA MAZZA, EZLN MEXICO E TUTTI GLI INDIOS ZAPATISTI MEXICO,TUTTI GLI ZAPATISTI NEL MONDO, PD-ARCI-PRC-SEL-PDCL-VERDI, SEDI CIA GAY SAN FRANCISCO E LOSANGELES, TUTTA OPERAZIONE CIA DA AGOSTO 2002 CON GAY E BSX NEL MONDO! BOMBARDAMENTO AL FOSFORO , TUTTA LA GUERRA IN IRAQ.PARTECIPAZIONE OPERAZIONI CIA IRAQ RADIORAI3 SEDI MILANO E ROMA. NOI DICHIARAMO MORTE A TUTTI LORO! LAMA ANTICIA!

  • guys the us isnt using the WP its the afganies. (the govt forces and army) us has never used WP on purpose in this war.

  • see its evil to use wp on infantry, i dont know why but u cant, u can how ever use it to destroy equipment, so burn the "uniforms" off them, and burn their weapons

  • @giantmidget420 maybe because WP burns extremely hot, decomposes in the open air, and can easily cut you in half, and is toxic to breath.

  • Frye em baby

  • pretty snowflakes

  • don't forget your sunscreen.

  • @rw5791

    you'll need some spf OVER NINE THOUSSSAANNDD!.... sunscreen

  • I really wish that you all would buck up and stop bitching about morals and standards. Place yourself in the shoes of an american who is being shot at and can tell that the bullets are flying from that direction and that every other innocent civilian is secretly holding a gun and a bullet with US written on the side of it. Then ask yourself if you wouldn't kill them without checking their ID for the word 'Enemy'

  • Comment removed

  • @RevenantCommando you seem to think that people complaining about the morals is an attack on the soldiers that are just doing a job for money to make a living & not the government who sends them to do it... shame on you

  • @yesitsvetz Honestly I am talking about boots on the ground specifically. In my personal opinion the Government should set a goal and then let the Military accomplish it however they see fit. Its when organizations like NATO and UN start limiting the weapons a soldier can use to accomplish a task that we run into issues. The Government behind the military is a whole different argument and I am more than happy to state my opinion on that as well but alas my word doesn't mean much.

  • Those bastards would use that on us in a heart beet. God bless the USA

  • and thats what american called democracy

  • hahah carcinogen, when those bastards would hit me with burning wp, a higher risk of getting cancer would be the least of my worries. after the israel WP bombardement a year ago, they still found phosphorous burning after TWO WEEKS later

  • total brutal

  • *sniff* ahhhhhh i loved smell of...... *drops*

  • this shit kills

  • Comment removed

  • Bring out tha good stuff:)

  • Bit of luck the dick head that invented this and other weapons of its type died a slow agonising death with cancer! Perhaps, if cancer was contagious like it is in some Animals, maybe with a bit of luck it would wipe out the imbeciles seed (family) as well. Fuck yas!

  • Ahhh Good Old Biological US made Weapons that they totaly not used except when they go to wars.

  • @ImperialGuard9001 White phos isn't biological

  • @ketsan Yes it damn well is, get your facts Jack!

  • @extramural Really? So which species is white phos cuz I thought it was a chemical rather than a virus or bacterium.

  • When my company changed XOs in 2007, the new XO was upset to find out that we still had 60mm WP in our ammo point. I was the ammo NCO at the time, and I was surprised to find out that WP had been a no no for several months. I don't know why. Fire-based weapons are perfect against fanatics because no matter how determined you are to die, it's really hard to make your nervous system work against fire. It's a primal fear.

  • white phosporous is banned by the geneva convention.

  • @thefredsays actually on civilians like it was used in fallujah

  • willy vs terry

    my bets on willy

  • Due to its abbreviation, they're also known as Willy Petes.

  • In Desert Storm the close air support we had were dropping 750 pound WP bombs on Iraqi trenches...it works just as advertised.

  • USA used White Phosphorous in CIVILIAN areas of Fallujah. The documentary by Sigfrido Ranucci and Maurizio Torrealta hopes to expose Us war crimes in Iraq

    watch?v=XCj2YsJElnE

  • @WorldAgainstUSA - why dont you talk about the use of sarin and mustard against U.S troops you lil bitch

  • @WorldAgainstUSA is not a crime kill muslims

  • @WorldAgainstUSA don't come crying to us(USA) when some one invades your home. you want us to stop being the worlds police dogs, fine, fight your own fights from now on.

  • @WorldAgainstUSA I hear ya. Nixon and his mate Calley did a fine job of that in 68. Why dose America insist on killing everything that moves? Their right to bear arms breeds contempt. The poor ole true Americans the Indians are left with 300 square acres on some reservation while the fat pigs destroy and eliminate everything that moves.Good to see they lost contacts for Middle Eastern Oil. Time to step back into line America or be made too.

  • @python11111 Ok

  • I love me some WP, let em burn

  • Well, another crime of USA....

  • @WorldAgainstUSA - lil terrorist sympathizing bitch, terrorists deserve wp and there shouldnt be any civilian casualties due to wp at night, so suck it lil russian or from where ever the fuck your from cunt

  • @crazyhillbillies As I said stick to what u know u idiot American Fuck..p.s U ever heard of windows...wanker!!!!

  • @juiCsqueeHgie - what the FUCK are you trying to say? learn some english bitch

  • stars*

  • uh, white stripes ! very so much

  • I don't have a problem with it. war is war.

  • Hey look Ukrainian flash lights!! Just kidding!!LOL

  • is white phosphorus illegal or something

  • I think so cause it never stops burning

  • No. It's illegal to use as a weapon though, be it against military or civilian targets. It can only legally be used as a smokescreen or flare. It was used illegally against insurgents in Fallujah though, henceforth no doubt this video is posted here.

  • @Emman498 white phosphorus is toxic

  • @Emman498 no shit

  • From BBC news reports it appears White Phoshorous is being used in Afghanistan today.

    People, Such a friendly bunch!

    F'kin 'ell eh?

  • Do you think ONU Assembly can be used as "deceptive tactic" by an ONU nation-member against another nation-member?

    Otherwise, what do you mean when you speak about "deceptive tactics" by Palestinian against Israel?

    Why do you not consider the Israeli guilts, but only the Palestinian ones?

    Do you think you are objective, this way?

    It seems to me not so.

  • When I say deceptive tactics, I mean as in attacking Isreal on a virtually daily basis and when they retaliate they use mosques, schools, and hospitals filled with hiding Palestinians holding them captive, then use It as a base launching attacks on IDF drawing a deadly conflict right where they are and intentionally getting them killed then blame IDF for "genocide". I don't deny Israeli guilt, but I know the Palestinians made their own hell with very poor decisions concerning the Israelis.

  • Yesterday, 22th of november 2009, Ezzedine al Qassam Brigades said they are going to accord with other groups in order to stop all launching of rockets. Being afraid and terrorized for the peace prospect opened by that declaration, yesterday Idf bombed Gaza in an air raid...

  • They have been saying that multiple times before, they didn't stop.

  • That's the Zionist hope.

  • It isn't the "Zionist Hope" If they have a bunch of psychos causing trouble in their back yards.

  • The Zionist political style is clear to me.

    They create their enemies in order to get money and protection by Usa. When they captured Marwan Barghouti, they did so to eliminate a possible successor to leadership after Arafat. Now they're going to set him free in change of Shalit, so Barghouti will be candidate for al-Fath agaist Hamas, in a popularity competition. That's a dangerous game, where people die, but not the Zionist ruler class. They don't care Israel security. That's their power.

  • Somebody should stop Hamas. Any competition against Hamas is a wonderful thing, you can not believe the perverted rule they have in Gaza.

  • Have you read by me the contrary? Hamas is a complication of Palestine politics, helped in 1980s by Israel to contrast al-Fath and other non-religious parties, because it was clear that a Palestinian Authority would reach a point of agreement acceptable by Israel, Usa and other nations. Religious fundamentalism was the key of power, both on Jew and Muslim people. Their power comes from a permanent state of war.

  • The War will end.

  • I hope so.

    But I think Zionism needs a constant state of war to keep power. The enemies of Zionists have ever been the opportunity and the resource of their power system.

  • Hamas, not Zionism, promotes such.

  • Palestinian Influences are minipulated by Iran, Hamas is one of Iran's sponsored groups that teach children that Jews are demons, and that they must hunt them and kill every one. They denied any Palestinian agreements that ever happened. They are taught to "Love Death as their enemies love life", whenever Isreal tries to warn the Gaza populus to evacuate, Hamas has them gather up and get themselves killed Instead.

  • I thing you are not well informed about Middle-East political situation, not for your negligence (information is a right and a duty for a citizen of a denocratic nation), but rather for the power of Israel lobby on USA media. You are demonizating Hamas because this is the target of a brending that is imposed to media by the Israel lobby and other (mainly financial-corporational) lobbies. You are only a little unaware soldier of their media-war.

  • American terrorism at its best.

    No wonder you are hated by the world.

    FUCK THE USA!

    The sooner the us imperialism ends the world can live in peace.

  • I support you....

  • redutd4eva,

    It isn't America that's gonna destroy you.

  • goddamn, that shit burns close to 2,400 degrees kalvin. lol

  • Hell Yeah!

    Burn, you Turban heads!

    -SK

  • we hope a use of White Phosphorus in afghanistan for destroy bastard taliban

  • I also have doubts IDF used white phospherous in Gaza, first because Hamas are the ones that have access to black markets, and two Hamas gets all sorts of illegal weapons created from Iran.

    But I do agree Hamas, Taliban, and Al'Qaeda deserve a taste of the good stuff (White Phosphorous)! lol

  • Hamas was financed by Israel to separate Palestinians, didn't you know? May be also to kill them!... It's a plot by Bin Laden and Santa Klaus...

  • Hamas is funded by Iran to destroy Isreal.

    Hamas is part of a terrorist network.

    Isreal would not support anything that wants to destroy them, that's a fact.

  • Ah-ah-ah!

    Are you serious or are you joking?

  • Sadly, I'm not joking.

  • Please read this article to know another opinion. The Wall Street Journal JANUARY 24, 2009

    How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas

    By ANDREW HIGGINS

  • Hamas was created in 1987, before they took Gaza very little was truly known about the group. If Isreal truly knew what Hamas was Isreal would have stopped them.

  • Poor little American boy!

    Israel helped Hamas to continue the zionist war that has been giving power to the zionist lobby & ruler class. And you (Usa citizen) pay every year a fiscal tribute to Israel to help Hamas terrorism, in order to legitimate zionism and all that middle-east madness.

    Did you understand, now?

  • That's your point of view,

    the Palestinians are hypocrites.

  • Your generalization seems to me a bit razist.

  • Don't exactly mean to be, but It's sadly quite true.

  • I know you are thinking I'm something like an antisemitic, because I criticize zionism and Israeli government. I don't hate Jews and I don't aspire to convince you of my reasons in so few words.

    I hope you'll try to understand. I'm sure of my ideas. I'm honest.

  • Perhaps, But I think the Arab world is biased against Isreal.

  • Which biases do you think Arab people have against Israel?

  • Alot, most often because they're Jews and they're demonized because of It. This is why people are trying to kill Israelis all the time.

  • You mean the same way Occidental people demonize Arabs?

  • No, more as in a literally radical religious kind of way.

  • Religion is exploited also in the secular, lay and illuministic Occident. In Italy Usa/Cia power has ruled also through popular catholic culture, with Christian Democratic Party. In Usa Israel lobby spreads the zionist propaganda through evangelical preachers. The Americans' support to Zionism has fundamentalist roots.

  • Perhaps with certain Zionist Parties, lets not forget Zionism has a mixture of different parties and both U.S.A. and Isreal have alot of tight bonds. Also, Isreal's gov. is ironically one of the more honest members of the U.N. especially when compared to Iran. :)

  • Both Iranian and Israeli governments systematically ignore the Onu resolutions of condamnation (mainly for crimes agaist human rights), since the instauration of zionist and khomeinist regimes. More than 100 resolutions against Israel since 1948; I don't know how many against Iran since 1979.

  • Palestinian organizations (especially Hamas) have avoided all U.N. international laws and Onu Resolutions.

    There have been accusations against Isreal that have been proven false because of extremist Palestinian groups like Hamas using deceptive tactics attempting to take advantage over Isreal.

  • Shake and Bake!

  • Enrage is right. Im in the Marine Corps and im a mortarman. as soon as the wp round goes off in the air it combusts as soon as it hits oxygen making it nearly impossible to put out . if you inhale it u are inhaling fire

  • Amazing isn't it? LOL!!

  • white phosphorous is an extreme carcinogen. if it is inhaled it will almost certainly cause cancer.

    unexploded white phosphorous in fallujah and gaza has caused so many cancer cases for returning civilians.

    its a shame this was dusted under the carpet when these weapons were deivsed

  • You're full of BS. Both the EPA and The International Agency for Research on Cancer have both determined that WP is not classifiable in terms carcinogenicity. (U.S. EPA, 1994a, IARC, 1987a)

    The fact that you'd even suggest it shows your ignorance. It is physically impossible to inhale WP. WP combusts spontaneously in the presences of oxygen. You'd have to inhale burning WP to be exposed to it as you suggest, and it would continue burning inside your lungs. You wouldn't live to get cancer.

  • @Enrage13 fuck you apologist for burning lungs,you red neck cunt.

  • @Rockster969

    I'm neither a redneck, nor am I incorrect.

    Way to show you ignorance on two accounts in one sentence.

  • @Enrage13 piss off Americunt,there is no justification for firing WP into urban areas

  • @Rockster969

    You're absolutely right.

    Well, except for that whole fighting a war thing.

  • @Rockster969 - piss off terrorist sympathizer cunt, i dont think citizens would be roaming fallujah at night unless they were fucking zombies, - and wp aint strong enough to melt right through a foot of solid concrete blocks

  • @crazyhillbillies Ah good man hilbilliy...a genuine hillbilly like outta Deliverance? Cool...Must say Gr8 guitar playin' dude...u shud really just stick to what ur gud at tho!!!

  • @crazyhillbillies Put ya firin iron and your Bud down for a sec mate.I'm no fucking terrorist sympathiser but putting down industrial loads of WP into crowded urban areas is counter productive mate as it's against the accepted articles of war.

    Makes you look like yee haa cunts ya see?

  • @Rockster969 - lol - but this is used for illumination purpose, also it pretty much is -Rule of Land Warfare, "The use of weapons which employ fire, such as tracer ammunition, flamethrowers, napalm and other incendiary agents, against targets requiring their use is not violative of international law."

  • @crazyhillbillies It wasn't used for illumination and you know it

  • @Rockster969 - it was and i know it, first of all it would land on the ground and blow everything to smithereens if they really wanted to kill people with it, but instead its launched and blows a good fitty feet to a hundred feet in the air and slowly falls to the ground illuminating the entire area =)

  • @crazyhillbillies it DID land on the ground and set everything on fire it touched.It's not used for illumination you dickhead but for smokescreens when used properly.

  • @Rockster969 - yo dumbass, first of all cant you see the entire surroundings when its pumped in the air? how the FUCK is it used as a smoke screen, you on crack? - and who would be roaming fallujah at night other than militants, so it won;t have much effect on innocent causalities

  • @crazyhillbillies Yes Civilians never go out at nigh.

  • @crazyhillbillies wow your the dumbass, its a well known fact that WP is used as a smokescreen, night vision and thermal vision were used, among others for identifiying targets, and the smoke it causes is toxic, so it can and does affect people who are in there homes. as happened in falluja.

  • @MrJoviun - T"he Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry has set an acute inhalation Minimum Risk Level (MRL) for white phosphorus smoke of 0.02 mg/m³, the same as fuel oil fumes. By contrast, the chemical weapon mustard gas is 30 times more potent: 0.0007 mg/m³" dumbass

  • @crazyhillbillies you have literally proved nothing asshole, the weapon is used as an incendiary by the us, it is commonly used as a smokescreen aswell, look it up literally anywhere. and dont quote irrelevant figures next time.

  • @MrJoviun - im sorry i wrote the comment which was dated a few months ago without much knowledge of WP. Although practically - who tha fuck would be sitting outside their house at night during a raging battle? there is not much chance of civilian casualties unless civilians would be outside past curfew. There is obviously no harm from wp gases other than irritation - no long term defects or shit

  • @crazyhillbillies there are a few videos of children on youtube who were born in fallujah after the battle, there mothers were exposed to the residual dust that was INSIDE their homes, the US army told them to disinfect their homes, yet there were still plenty of burns from the dust and it is belived to be directly linked to a twelve-fold increase in the rate of birth deformities in fallujah. an increase that occured after the battle. another point WP can burn through many materials homes...

  • @MrJoviun ...were burnt down and the people inside many homes in fallujah were killed either by the burning debris, the falling WP that burnt through the roofs and walls of the houses or the residual homes which killed many civilians, there are videos and images of the dead bodies of iraqi women who were inside their homes yet the smoke burnt them melting their faces and other parts of the bodies yet leaving their clothes intact. the actual WP itself can burn through metal meanging that those...

  • @MrJoviun ...inside were no more safe than those outside.

  • @MrJoviun Smoke screen? Wake the fuck up. You use smoke for a smokescreen, not white hot phosphorus reigning down to burn holes through any flesh they touch, be it man, woman, or child. The only smokescreen is the one they feed YOU.

  • @IChIDH the clouds that form from white phorphourus ARE SMOKE you dumb shit, smoke is a by product of combustion, which is what happens to white phosphorus or any flammable material when it undergoes combustion. you are also a dumb shit as i am against the use of white phosphourus, as i was explaining to crazyhillbillies who claimed that the use of WP was justified and that the smoke was non-toxic, when acc it is very lethal.

    you are an utter retard.

  • @MrJoviun Okay Jesus...lol. I just read your comment that said they were used as a smoke screen, which is what they do say it is for, but that's not the reality. So okay, we agree.

  • @IChIDH White Pho. Was used as a Smoke Screen, It was Burnt Diffrent though, A White Pho. Bombs though, Is tapered with a High grated Naplam.

  • is this an example of you fail science forever...

    it's like saying unreacted sodium in a tub of water is an extreme carcinogen... lol...

  • Dirty American scumbags in som1 elses country showering them with fire in their beds, any1 justifying this is on par with nazism.

  • yeah i mean all we did was take down one of the worst dictators ever and install a democracy

    you obviously have no comprehension of how the events in Iraq will make the Middle East more democratic

  • "being used in Fallujah" if anyone except an insurgent was in their beds at this time they are retarded, since the US told them for weeks to get the fuck out of the city beacose an atack will be soon

  • wasn't white phosphorus banned the U.N? i'm neutral with the war but i hate how they used white phosphorus.

  • i agree it was very wrong

  • I think people attaching bombs to themselves and blowing themselves up and others around them just because they're different (or no reason) is worse. The U.S. military has hardly killed any civilians, especially when you compare it to what the insurgents do.

    WP can be imprecise. That doesn't make it wrong. Objects are not good or evil. People may be one or the other. Its how people use things with the circumstances accounted for that make decisions right, wrong, or neutral.

  • WP is a torture weapon

  • No more than a piece of shrapnel. Killing somebody through warfare is what matters, not by what means. Its not like we're using biological or nuclear weapons here.

  • chemical weapon that was created cause napalm got illeagal

  • Incendiary weapon that was created to effectively destroy light targets whilst inflicting severe mental stress. Was invented and fielded before napalm. Napalm is still a legal incendiary weapon, though cannot be used much.

    Learn correct English and some history, too.

  • ⊙⁔⊙ well sorry tht i dont care about incendiary munitions or i dont speak english well

  • Wrong. First chemical weapons were used 30 years before napalm was invented.

  • The United States did not sign Article 1 of Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which prohibited incendiary weapons against civilians. The U.N. didn't do anything.

    And you've got to understand this. War is violence in it's purest form. It is not surgical, it is bloody. Putting limitations on it to keep it from being over sooner is incomprehensible.

    And WP can be used for concealment, as well.

  • ...It is all about perspective. I see no good or evil, just two groups that have been mislead into hating each other. As we wage war on the terrorists, don't you think that we search through their villages and capture suspects, or blow shit up? If they don't understand our reasons, don't you think they will be easily lead to believe that we are evil, and aggressors? The taliban may be power hungry, but fighting them conventionally will only make their cause more appealing to the locals.

  • oorah good ol willy peter

  • Humans are so brutal, lol.

  • When America uses weapons of war in accordance with UN regulations in a city of 7000 insurgents, it is condemned and accused of a massacre.

    When innocent civilians are kidnapped by Islamic extremists and beheaded on camera, nobody seems to have a problem with it.

    Think about it.

  • thank you so much

  • Actually there was reported to be only 2000-3000 insurgents in the city. Later it was reported that "Between 1,200 1,600 insurgents were reported killed, as well as 2,000 civilians". Maybe you don't want to call it a massacre, but get your facts straight. Say that they killed 2000 civilians and 1500 insurgents out of the reportedly 2000-3000 insurgents.

    This is my source

    Roman O. Reyhani,The Legality of the Use of White Phosphorus by the United States Military during the 2004 Fallujah Assaults

  • I misread my source. Officials believed 1,000-6,000 were in, yes, nearly 1,300 were killed. And wrong, 800 civilians were killed, according to the Red Cross.

    And by the way, your source is a college essay written by an anti-war zelaot who's essay was picked up by a liberal publisher (suprise suprise: Berkely Electronic Press)

    Furthermore, it is anything but a massacre. Do some research on the uses of WP. I highly doubt that American soldiers intentionally used it on civilians.

  • Advice is judged by results, not intentions.

    I'm not saying what anyone did is bad; it's not my job. I just wanna make sure that things aren't too one sided.

    I'm not against the military, I'm in Army ROTC. That doesn't mean I'll defend everything they do.

  • get your facts straight: it was a masters thesis, written in under supervision of the legal office of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (which the US is a member of), and it has been picked up by a number of governments.

  • what i think is that americans created much of the problem , with their aggresion to other nations in the middle east...just because they want to control the oil fields...it's like someone coming in to my house or backyard and trying to take something i own.

  • Sympathizer.

  • Is having sympathy something bad? Is trying to see their point of view wrong? Wouldn't it be helpful to make peace if we understood why they hate us?

    The CIA term 'blowback' refers to a counter-attack after a covert operation. The civilians don't know their intelligence agency performed this covert op and believe that they were attacked without provocation. We don't know half the shit that goes on over there, so we dont understand the source of their hatred.

  • Hatred is because of U.S support for Israel. That's what is all comes back to.

  • Having sympathy for terrorists?

    You schmuck, didn't you learn anything from 9/11?

    Have you watched the beheading videos?

    No.

  • I do not support violence on either side of this conflict.

    Not saying to side with the terrorists just to attempt to understand them. The middle east is full of death, I'm certain that the average person there is not happy with those conditions. But, the last thing we need to do is give their propaganda machines fuel and let them continue to label us as the cause for their plight.

    There are different terrorist groups, with different demands, and different levels of support from the locals...

  • (continued)

    Not, all of them will have rational reasons behind their hatred for us. I mean they are indeed religious extremists. But, the general idea is that they hate us and we hate them. We attack them because they attack us, so isn't it also likely that they attack us because we attack them?

    Yes, 9/11 was terrible, and we decided to wage war on terror because of it. But, terrorism is supported by hatred, and hatred is enhanced by our foreign policy....

  • (continued)

    Middle eastern politics are too fucked up for us to be involved with. We do not have the resources to be the world's police, and we would actually be safer if we avoided unnecessary conflict.

    I understand your point of view, you see them as unjustified, and we were attacked so we are justified. A million Iraqis are dead, so don't you think the insurgents feel that they are justified. I am not saying that they are. Killing is rarely truly justifiable. I just want to open your eyes...

  • It's very easy to label them as "Terrorists" and there for they need to be killed. It would be far better to find out why they are "terrorists" and address that problem.

  • The ends don't justify the means.

  • That can apply to both sides.

  • Hahaha no. Check your facts. The US hasn't got any oil from Iraq at all. Hell, we get more oil from Iran than we do Iraq. Obviously, you didn't see the face we were paying 4 dollars for gas back then.

  • you idiot, get the facts correct, they havent yet, because the country is unstable, but already all the big oil companies from all over are making plans, and we will be paying 4 dollars again...so take a deep breath and pull your head out of your ass.

  • Uh huh, and do you know this interesting little fact. We could have gotten the oil much cheaper and easier if we had wanted to. All we had to do is lift the embargo on Iraq and give them some nonsensical 'benchmarks' to reach. You know another interesting fact. Canada gets more oil from Iraq now then we do. If you look you'll see several major canadian oil companies moving into the kurdish region of Iraq right now.

  • we arab want a real peace no just talking about the defenition of peace !!!

    but islael goverment dont want a peace

    they want a war !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    then we shlould protect ourselves

  • You're both at fault. Deal with it.

  • I think U.S.A and israel both terrorists because they killing people sorry for my bad english

  • Quit being so fucking arrogant.

  • Well, what do you know. Al Qaeda kills people to so i guess they're terrorists.

  • Ah shit Iraq has weapons of mass destrution!

    Quick pour this glowing crap down their throats lol.

    The death by this is unimaginable to me, to just scream and thrash as it melts all over you :(

  • well boo fuckin' hoo for the terrorists.. If they don't want to burn, they shouldn't attack innocent women and children.