if Leo travels back in time, alternate earth or not, it creates a paradox because the course of history has changed, so how did the spaceship even come about to leave Earth in the first place? in a world run by apes, how was he even born? it creates a paradox that contradicts his existence as well as the events of the start of the film...
either the filmmakers were really dumb and wrote a dumb conclusion or they were really brilliant and the film conclusion makes sense (very unlikely!!). The original planet of the apes made sense and the conclusion there was that the crew landed on future earth. Humanity would end up destroying itself and apes would take over.
In Tim Burton's version, the apes and humans miraculously make peace (??). The alternate ending theory does not make sense even if you factor parallel universe.
This is nice, but doesn't make sense. If he travled back, after defeating Thade, wouldn't Thade in alternate Earth be defeated as well? Because one would assume there to be an alternate Leo as well. Also, if it was an alternate Earth, why would the writing above statue Thade imply that he saved the apes from the implied "human oppression?" the writing implies that he defeated Leo, then rewrote history to make it appear as if he was the Hero. In all honesty the ending should have just been Leo s
ACTUALLY, it's been a LONG time since I've watching the 2001 version, so it's all very fuzzy for me. But if I remember correctly, he went into some sort of time warp or something? Well, in the new Rise of The Planet of the Apes, they do have a scene were the TV is showing something about astornauts trying for mars. That would be Mark Wahlberg. So then he comes back , but comes back later than usual or something, and the apes took over. I can't remeber much from the first too,so do correct me.
I don't care how bad the plot and some of the acting was overall, but I have to give credit where it's due: The costume effects were amazing (much better than the CGI facial stuff in the recent Apes movie, although that was a damn good effort), and Tim Roth as a powerhungry, unstable chimpanzee? Fucking. Terrifying.
I think at first they were fighting with humans, then they want to life like humans did before apocalypse. The worm hole just give him timetravel not alternative timeline
Anyway i prefer Rise of Planet of Apes version than some landing from space version lol..
To add tim burton already said thatthe ensing doesnt really give much of an explanation.he really meant to end the movie like that to give any other directors who would like to continue with a sequel enough plot to proceed.u guys can look it up.i think i read that at wikipedia
What i think is it was pretty much explained in RISE...as shown in the movie there was a launch of austronauts to mars that later on was lost in space.considering if that character is mark walhberg who was lost in time travelling,it just explain that when he comes back,ceasar's decendant has already taken over the world after the holocaust the illness brought up at the end of the film.so mark did really reach the real earth.make sense?
It's not 400 years in the future, Ari tells that mothership has been there for miles of years...the counter in the pod just shows a little part of the final counting..
the rise of the planet of the apes, got me confuced i've seen the old movies, and the two knew ones i think i get it now He goes to a planet, and its full of intelligent apes, while back there, csaszar is gets that smoky stuff and makes all the apes smart after they begin an uprising, all that smoky stff kills the humans in the world, the surviving humans get captured, that guy has been gone for a long time, he comes home and sees that more intelligent apes are in control.i like old movie better
Guys, guys... maybe Thades DID travel back in time. Remember how at the end, he was lockced up in the ship??? What if he somehow found fuel and used the ship to go back in time??? That seems alot more reasonable to me.
Time travels combined with alternate universes with their own different time lines?
That would make a great confusion. Time changes everything. The Past always change the Future. And try to recall the movie, "Meet the Robinsons", everyone has their own alternate-selves in there - could be a young one in the past or he didn't existed yet, or an old one in the future or found his remains on a graveyard or something.
One thing is forgotten... same individual must be in same timeline, while timelines differ by many many many years, if it would be same year, theory would be correct , but year is different, so unless abraham statue shows different person, there is no logic in it...
Other than that.. I enjoyed explanation..
p.s pod theory would keep 3rd movie classic appearing, because they magickly at right time found pod in water, and decided to use it by no particular reason, which is absurd
It kind of upset me that they tried to make you think "The victors wright history, so maybe Lincoln was bad just like Thade". Sometimes, the heroes are victorious. And the victors don't always alter history. In fact, I think a witnessing, 3rd party group of people make sure the actual past is documented, and the truth eventually conquers any lies set by wicked victors.
the endng is how its written in the original book, in the book he goes to an alien planet and discovers that there were humans there but apes outevolved them, when he gets back to earth he discovered thats happened on earth also
My sources tell me that Leo landed on Ape Earth in 5021, so millions of years, no. And Tim Burton himself said this. "It was a reasonable cliffhanger that could be used in case Fox or another filmmaker wanted to do another movie."
Basically the ending was not supposed to make any sense, but it was more of a cliffhanger to be explained in a possible sequel.
And in all fairness it's just a bullshitty film with a bullshitty ending, get over it.
Can I just point out that the Planet of the Apes in Tim Burton's re-imagined film is definitely NOT Earth. Your video states that the multiple moons shown in orbit may be the result of this Earth being MILLIONS of years in the future. It isn't. You quite clearly showed that it is only about 400 years in the future. Thank you.
I think after rise of the planet of the apes, the virus spreads from that pilot, and kills of of humanity. But the virus makes the apes smarter. So when the humans die out, They take over. But only very few humans survive.
my take: Instead he lands on the planet he just left from only arriving farther into its future.
Thade sets about to mimic the great civilization that he could have viewed via the computers of the Oberon that captured all of Earth's electromagnetic broadcasts according to its crew.
I think there’s a very deep message in this Rise of the Apes movie that creates a strong parallel to our own History……I mean think about it…its a story about a species that goes through a huge genetic leap literally overnight. Now ask yourself what species has actually gone through a huge genetic leap in real life? That’s right humans! And how much do we actually know about our own genetic leap………….Was it a natural or unnatural? Were we aided like the monkeys were in the new movie?
everyone confused about rise of the apes...rise of the planet of the apes is a prequel and reimagination to the ORIGINAL planet of the apes. this is time burtons adaptation.
Do a Google-search for a Fanfiction story called “Planet of the Apes 2: History Rewritten.” This narrative explains how Thade altered Earth’s history and then shows how Leo escapes and changes it all back.
you should connect this to the latest movie because in the ending the virus is spreading and the setting is almost similar to the timeline that the 1st movie started
As said before, who cares about the explanations for a rubbish film?
Tim Burton should stick to his forte: dark, comic material like Sleepy Hollow or Beetlejuice. Because he's rubbish at more serious material.
If you really want to see a GREAT Planet of the Apes movie, stick to the original, or the new prequel, RISE - watched it yesterday and it is simply EXCELLENT.
Burton's version is so crap I didn't even remember its ending until I stumbled upon this.
@jnoempire. I know that that pod is not a time travel device but there's a worm hole right outside their planet. How the hell do you explain Leo jumping forward and backward in time as he entered and left that planet and how the hell do you explain earth being a ape dominant planet when Leo comes back...and not only that, how the hell do you explain a memorial of Thade specifically on earth when Thade is from a different time and a different planet. People like you are the ones responsible for
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed).
(continued...) Their ship lands on that planet looking for Leo in 2029 but Leo gets bumped thosands of years in the future (by accidently entering some kinna worm hole) and lands on the same planet. Leo realizes that the apes aboard the mothership thrived on this new planet because of their intelligence (man trained...we also see later that Leo's ape lands the space pod perfectly where as Leo crash lands both times and so did his crew when they tried to land the mother
(continued...) ship on this planet...implying that the apes aboard the ship were in some ways smarter than the humans even before the crash landing, their take over, and the evolution), superior strength (compared to humans) and natural surviving skills because they are wild animals (as compared to the softer humans). They rebelled against the humans on that ship, and did whatever necessary to survive which may have also included mating with human females forcefully to reproduce
(continued...) for the survival and continuation of their species. This plus thousands of years of evolution may explain why they were more intelligent then traditional apes, had more human like appearance (face and body), and spoke the human language, hence becoming the dominating species on this new planet. The humans on the other hand escaped to the forest and survived as the premitive species on the planet and after thousands of years of evolution became dumb animal
(continued...) like creatures. When Leo figures this out and goes back to earth, he goes a little farther behind then where he came from, that is he lands back in 2001 (the time the movie was made) instead of 2029. I say this because of the police cars, guns ,etc (notice the early 2000's model crown vics, the late 90's Chevy Suburban fire dept SUV, the semi auto guns the cops were carrying) were of the generation the movie was made rather then futuristic like stuff like the space ship,
(continued...) the space pod, the communication gadget, high tech weapons from 2029. As far as the new "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is concerned, Caesar started his new revolution in the time this new movie was made which is 2011. So there no way these two movies were related bcuz otherwise the planet would already have been ape dominated in 2011 when Caesar was born. Also if you noticed when Leo comes back to earth it was general Thade instead on
(continued...) President Lincoln (and not Caesar) and the writing on the wall said that it was a memorial temple in honor of General Thade. How did that happen??? The only thing I can think of is that General Thade was not killed and was caged alive in the command center of the mother ship. Thade being an intelligent ape would have seen the video log and would have researched over stuff on the bridge and have figured out a way to work this technology. Him having the only gun on
(continued...) the planet (the gun was said to have the power of a thousand spears), he would have claimed command of the planet once he figured out a way to get out of his cage. And then all he had to do was to pull out the delta pod from the water, figure out a way to fix it and launch it and come to planet earth in a time thousands of years before the current time and restart the evolution chain of the ape dominated planet on earth this time. "Rise of the Planet of the Apes"
@thejaynand "...And then all he had to do was to pull out the delta pod from the water, figure out a way to fix it and launch it and come to planet earth in a time thousands of years before the current time and restart the evolution chain of the ape dominated planet on earth this time." I think you are wrong here. The pod is not a time travelling device. It only time travelled due to the spacial anomaly. Even if fixed it he would not have been able to time travel back into the past.
(continued...) is in no way connected to the "Planet of the Apes" other then the fact that it is based on the same concept which is if Apes were as smart as humans, they'll take over. If anything I would say that the "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is a remake of the 1972 film "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes" with it's own twist.
(continued...) please disregard all my comments below. I apologize. I tried to fit everything on one page and it did not work so I tried to split'em up and I totally messed up bcuz I tried to do this all from my cell phone.
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed). T
(continued...) the space pod, the communication gadget, high tech weapons from 2029. As far as the new "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is concerned, Caesar started his new revolution in the time this new movie was made which is 2011. So there no way these two movies were related bcuz otherwise the planet would already have been ape dominated in 2011 when Caesar was born. Also if you noticed when Leo comes back to earth it was general Thade instead on
(continued...) for the survival and continuation of their species. This plus thousands of years of evolution may explain why they were more intelligent then traditional apes, had more human like appearance (face and body), and spoke the human language, hence becoming the dominating species on this new planet. The humans on the other hand escaped to the forest and survived as the premitive species on the planet and after thousands of years of evolution became dumb animal
(continued...) ship on this planet...implying that the apes aboard the ship were in some ways smarter than the humans even before the crash landing, their take over, and the evolution), superior strength (compared to humans) and natural surviving skills because they are wild animals (as compared to the softer humans). They rebelled against the humans on that ship, and did whatever necessary to survive which may have also included mating with human females forcefully to reproduce
(continued...) Their ship lands on that planet looking for Leo in 2029 but Leo gets bumped thosands of years in the future (by accidently entering some kinna worm hole) and lands on the same planet. Leo realizes that the apes aboard the mothership thrived on this new planet because of their intelligence (man trained...we also see later that Leo's ape lands the space pod perfectly where as Leo crash lands both times and so did his crew when they tried to land the mother
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed).
@Svvagable Exacly, Rise of The apes, the evolution starts in 2011, with Caesar, not the other ape. And there is no drug showed on this one. But if you recall, the fat scientist in the lab caught the disease from the virus that was meant to cure alzheimer's, but the apes that were tested gained intelligence with NO side affects the humans had, the fat dude then transferred the disease to the neighbour and it spreads out killing humans, so Leo went to Earth after rise of the apes
@childlogiclabs yes it does. rise of the planet of the apes is a prequel to this one and shows how the apes took over earth. when the guy came back to earth it was full of apes. it shows how they took over. all the humans died off because the "cure for alzheimer's" does something to humans that apes are immune too.
@childlogiclabs I really wouldn't even call it a prequel to the original. More of a reboot that happens to take place before the original. They reference the Icarus, true, but I've heard they plan to remake the original eventually, so I didn't see it as Charlton Heston's character actually being on the ship. But I guess if they never actually remake the original, no one would be too butthurt if one considers Rise an actual prequel to the original.
if you recall, the fat scientist in the lab caught the disease from the virus that was meant to cure alzheimer's, but the apes that were tested gained intelligence with NO side affects the humans had, the fat dude then transferred the disease to the neighbour who went on a plane! This means that later on humans DIED OUT! with the orignal smart apes unaffected, and managed to reproduce with the same smart genes! Therefore the guy returning to Earth is Earth with humans extinct!!
Wow, man, i've barely seen anything of that movie, only short parts and the ending, but i really like the analystic look, with the highlights and such, really good job.
According to John Ross Bowie, this was originally a fake ending to throw off sites like Ain't it Cool News from spoiling the film. No idea how it actually made it into the final cut.
Tim Burton screwed up planet of the apes, case closed. I thought rise was the best movie I've ever seen it was brilliant and can fit perfectly with the original movie even if they don't make a sequel, which I doubt theyll pass up that chance after the money it made...the 2001 film made a ton of dough but didn't get the word of mouth of this one.
hate Tim Burton never seen a Tim Burton movie I liked in my life worse than that he take good movie ideas good storys and ruins them thank god he never got his stupid goth hands on Superman!
@KillSwitch2 Havent seen Ed Wood but have seen the other 2 and stand by what a said terrible everything looks all gothic and depressing and just unplesant *shudder* there is just so so many better directors out there
Just asking all you pros out there: I just watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes and it was a good movie. But is it a prequel to the Planet of the Apes (2001) or the original one? I mean, both have different stories but I want to know which story was Rise linked to?
@NeedaBettrName neither bro....Its not a prequel its a reboot of the entire franchise, but i believe the movies to follow this one will be closer to the original charlton heston story, hope that helps
From what I understand, an astronaut was sent to Mars, got stuck. Caesar rises, and like the movie has shown a bit minutes after the credits, the human race will extinct due to the virus (humans will extinct, because our immune system is not able to fight the virus, but the apes' immune system is way stronger than ours). Did you see the pilot was infected, let blood all over the airport and all those destinations...RISE OF TPOTA WAS DA BOMB! DYING TO SEE THE SEQUEL. I hope they make it right.
Leo time traveled back to his planet and timeline but his ship didnt take him back to his original time, the humans are almost dead and the monkeys have taken over, ceasar is dead in this time, i mean i was like 100 years after ceasars time, ceasar rised when he was going to space, lets wait for the next movie and we will see when the monkeys will make an civilization. and my guess is that they dont understand the human technology and will wipe out most of the earth with a bomb in a accident.
@KittyKranker But I see why they wouldn't wanna re do the original. Its a classic and they don't wanna make it worse. So Im done talking about this. We are both right in different ways.
@KittyKranker And I watch movies that are older than me all the time? And not old enough to remember? Thats ridiculous. Because I do know. The Spider Man movies were the best super hero flicks ever. They made more money than any other super hero movie. So saying Im too young to remember is like saying you're too young to remember the original POTA, and yes I've seen the old ones. My mom is a fan.
@KittyKranker 1) They only did so good because they were the only Spider-Man movies. They had nothing to do with the original comics and story, while the new one is the real SM. 2) The new Spider -Man is a prequel. It focuses on his childhood and teenage life more than the old ones did hence, prequel to before he became Spider-Man. 3) I never said they're going to be making them EXACTLY the same as the 70's POTA, just rebooting it to a modern time with better special effects and acting.
@KittyKranker I dont believe that because... They are rebooting the Spider-Man series and they are starting with the prequel to Spider-Man. Focusing on his past and his teen years. Unlike the first 3 horrible movies. What happened was Universal or Paramount (I forgot who did the originals and the 2001 remake) lost the license to TPOTA. This new company bought it and are redoing the movies.
Alright I get what you're proposing, that not only did the storm at the end of the movie take him back to the past but that it also took him to an alternate/parallel universe as well... but shit, why did that alternate universe just HAVE to be populated by apes just like the future other dimension he just returned from?
This movie still didnt make any sense even tho your explanation did- and the only reason 'an alternate earth' makes sense as a theory is because otherwise everything falls apart- its pure fudge which is better than the movie which was just crap.
You used WAAAAAY too much time on "explaining" this. You used more than 7 minutes on a conclusion that isn't even very good or informative?! I want that time back! Maybe in an alternative timeline I didn't waste my time on this?
i dont know what to make of it but what i think is that it dosent really matter why the movies with a time difference of 40 years dont fit together. all that matters is that all of the films are too show that animals are a lot smarter that we given them credit for even if they dont fit into modern society. and that if we treat them like the guy who tom felton played (applause) did then they will might just surprise you :D
i don't think this movie has anything to do with the new one or the original. No disrespect to the people that made it, but it was very bad. it mad a shame out of the original and the new is trying to make you forget it
Dude that is so wrong. In the new Planet of the Apes movie if you see in the backround a rocket takes off to mars. When those astronauts take off and are gone the apes take over. When they land years and years later the apes have all ready taken over. The one in 2001 makes no sense. The origanl is better because the guy discovers it is the earth because he sees the statue of librity.
But what about cesar i actually thought that ape lincon was cesar from the new movie because honestly the really look alike can some one plz explain me how the 2001 version and 2011 have in common? Plz :-)
@mgs4vaderfan supposedly, according to a few people I talked to "the rise of the planet of the apes" is a prequel, not sure if that's true but a few clues to make sense, the space shuttle launch in the new one, the newspaper that said "lost in space" and a few other things I can't remember kind of hint to this movie, anyways i hope thats right because i dont wanna feed you some Bullshit, if im wrong could someone please correct me.
@mgs4vaderfan Ill give you the best answer ever............OK......ready..................Similar titles and similar concept, theys two movies are in no way the same or related to each other, other than my two reasons given. The 2001 was a failed remake with a confusing story. The new one will be its own series of films, obviously in some ways based off the original films. In my opinon I think some snubby journalist needs to go find the damn script writer for the 2001 flm and get some answers
I like the explanation of the parallel unvierses theory. The Universe at the end of Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes seems to be the one set on The Rise of the Planet of the Apes Earth. The Earth feature in this movie is a Parallel Earth, but on the Rise's Earth. Most of the human race on the Rise's perish as a result of a virus Oddly, Rise seems to predict the next movie.
90% of this video is good but at end.. ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH.... Yeah we get that. But we're watching this to find out WHY it is an alternate Earth. So the conclusion to video is....
@rrtt1 if you don't have the science background, read The Physics of Star Trek which was written by real physicists who try to explain in layman terms quantum mechanics, string theory, general relativity, and time travel. Cause and effect, which is how we deduce and reason does not necessarily make sense. Even after reading that book, it was a bit difficult to comprehend the logic.
That aside, I hated the ending (because my mind can't wrap around the logic), but overall, it was a good movie.
Meh... this theory is the easiest one to avoid thinking of a real posibility. With alternate universe, who cares about continuity anyway. I call bullshit on this.
Funny thing is, I think you've probably thought out this ending more than the writers who came up with it. They just tried to come up with the most unexpected twist, even if it didn't make sense.
THUMBS UP IF AGREE AND THINK leo went threw a time warp to earth in the future, and then when he left trying to return home he went through it again taking hime father into the future where the apes have advanced in technology, the only explanation is that thade got free and somehow got free and continued his conquest against the humans, and the apes defaced the licoln memorial and put thades face and i believe with all the time travel the machine got confused with what year it was and screwed
Did you even watch the video? My initial conclusion was an alternate universe, your explanation is quite simply too far fetched and tiring, not to mention stupid when the explanation is quite clear if you take several seconds to even ponder on the subject. No, I will not thumbs you up because I believe you are an ape due to your lack of common sensibilities.
Comment removed
Blackundetected 1 day ago
thats a twisted ending.
MrMejia187 2 days ago
song at the beginning?
bioniclesunited 1 week ago
if Leo travels back in time, alternate earth or not, it creates a paradox because the course of history has changed, so how did the spaceship even come about to leave Earth in the first place? in a world run by apes, how was he even born? it creates a paradox that contradicts his existence as well as the events of the start of the film...
neworderarmy 3 weeks ago
either the filmmakers were really dumb and wrote a dumb conclusion or they were really brilliant and the film conclusion makes sense (very unlikely!!). The original planet of the apes made sense and the conclusion there was that the crew landed on future earth. Humanity would end up destroying itself and apes would take over.
In Tim Burton's version, the apes and humans miraculously make peace (??). The alternate ending theory does not make sense even if you factor parallel universe.
valkyr989 3 weeks ago
NICE VID btw how long did it actually took to make you this unofficial great ending ?
TheAgol07 3 weeks ago
if you wanna watch the movie i will upload it in 1 video. IF i can get at least 50 subs :)
Urbanpredator76 1 month ago
I wish they would have made a sequel to the 2001 version instead of a reboot.
XxRaN96xX 1 month ago
the end is twisted in more ways than one very sick mr burton
mrharleychops 1 month ago
This is nice, but doesn't make sense. If he travled back, after defeating Thade, wouldn't Thade in alternate Earth be defeated as well? Because one would assume there to be an alternate Leo as well. Also, if it was an alternate Earth, why would the writing above statue Thade imply that he saved the apes from the implied "human oppression?" the writing implies that he defeated Leo, then rewrote history to make it appear as if he was the Hero. In all honesty the ending should have just been Leo s
emmyvonkaulitz 1 month ago
@emmyvonkaulitz no its alternate it is supposed to be different that's why its alternate although this theory fucking creeps me out of life
TheAgol07 3 weeks ago
Thats all very good but can someone explain how the Apes had horses?
DaleisTankRid 1 month ago
Everybody... see the ORIGINAL Plannet of the Apes, thats all I have to say
MattDdirector 1 month ago
ACTUALLY, it's been a LONG time since I've watching the 2001 version, so it's all very fuzzy for me. But if I remember correctly, he went into some sort of time warp or something? Well, in the new Rise of The Planet of the Apes, they do have a scene were the TV is showing something about astornauts trying for mars. That would be Mark Wahlberg. So then he comes back , but comes back later than usual or something, and the apes took over. I can't remeber much from the first too,so do correct me.
TheOnlyBlueStopSign 1 month ago
now I understood everything
RoDriHiT4z0s 1 month ago
I don't care how bad the plot and some of the acting was overall, but I have to give credit where it's due: The costume effects were amazing (much better than the CGI facial stuff in the recent Apes movie, although that was a damn good effort), and Tim Roth as a powerhungry, unstable chimpanzee? Fucking. Terrifying.
MightBiteYa 1 month ago
I think at first they were fighting with humans, then they want to life like humans did before apocalypse. The worm hole just give him timetravel not alternative timeline
Anyway i prefer Rise of Planet of Apes version than some landing from space version lol..
Mrozek93 2 months ago
To add tim burton already said thatthe ensing doesnt really give much of an explanation.he really meant to end the movie like that to give any other directors who would like to continue with a sequel enough plot to proceed.u guys can look it up.i think i read that at wikipedia
dorei13 2 months ago
What i think is it was pretty much explained in RISE...as shown in the movie there was a launch of austronauts to mars that later on was lost in space.considering if that character is mark walhberg who was lost in time travelling,it just explain that when he comes back,ceasar's decendant has already taken over the world after the holocaust the illness brought up at the end of the film.so mark did really reach the real earth.make sense?
dorei13 2 months ago
will leo be able to return to the original earth again?
yikshunchan 2 months ago
It's not 400 years in the future, Ari tells that mothership has been there for miles of years...the counter in the pod just shows a little part of the final counting..
Addario13423 2 months ago
This is all very confusing.
norskman69 2 months ago
What if rise of the apes is the alternate earth???thumbs up if you agree.
xtremanater321 2 months ago
the rise of the planet of the apes, got me confuced i've seen the old movies, and the two knew ones i think i get it now He goes to a planet, and its full of intelligent apes, while back there, csaszar is gets that smoky stuff and makes all the apes smart after they begin an uprising, all that smoky stff kills the humans in the world, the surviving humans get captured, that guy has been gone for a long time, he comes home and sees that more intelligent apes are in control.i like old movie better
WakeupnowandResist 2 months ago
Nice effects, dude. And the explanations actually makes sense, so good job
decdec1234 2 months ago
im still so confused, please someone explain 'Planet of the Apes' for dummies' to me? thankyou x
JadeeSienna231 2 months ago
Guys, guys... maybe Thades DID travel back in time. Remember how at the end, he was lockced up in the ship??? What if he somehow found fuel and used the ship to go back in time??? That seems alot more reasonable to me.
PrincessYarnIsMyName 2 months ago
alternate earth = where thades died ? so he launched his pod and he land at his starting point ?
jonath102 2 months ago
*Brain farts*
jonath102 2 months ago
So Leo is very fucked up!!!
06Mtx 2 months ago
there will be a sequel to this movie??
RoDriHiT4z0s 2 months ago
@RoDriHiT4z0s no this was a a complete fuck up by tim bruton
Redvsbluefan900 2 months ago
They should have made another movie after this ending! It was such an open ending so.
xRiica 3 months ago 2
So if you combine time travels and parallel worlds together, you'll get all things wrong... :)
ekoi1995 3 months ago
Messy just like ... pubes...
Time travels combined with alternate universes with their own different time lines?
That would make a great confusion. Time changes everything. The Past always change the Future. And try to recall the movie, "Meet the Robinsons", everyone has their own alternate-selves in there - could be a young one in the past or he didn't existed yet, or an old one in the future or found his remains on a graveyard or something.
ekoi1995 3 months ago
God dam you! God dam you all to hell!
codmaster967 4 months ago
how did the ape drive the car?
icemagz 4 months ago
he traveled to the same planet but in future(pota)
marissochka 4 months ago
Comment removed
wallyweek 4 months ago
One thing is forgotten... same individual must be in same timeline, while timelines differ by many many many years, if it would be same year, theory would be correct , but year is different, so unless abraham statue shows different person, there is no logic in it...
Other than that.. I enjoyed explanation..
p.s pod theory would keep 3rd movie classic appearing, because they magickly at right time found pod in water, and decided to use it by no particular reason, which is absurd
ihalloway 5 months ago
It kind of upset me that they tried to make you think "The victors wright history, so maybe Lincoln was bad just like Thade". Sometimes, the heroes are victorious. And the victors don't always alter history. In fact, I think a witnessing, 3rd party group of people make sure the actual past is documented, and the truth eventually conquers any lies set by wicked victors.
GeekingForJesus 5 months ago
This video scared the shit outta me
StrypaMan4Life 5 months ago 13
@StrypaMan4Life for the mindfucking effect it put on ur brain, right?
kleeTheDarkKnight 4 months ago
@StrypaMan4Life hmm.. that's strange.
childlogiclabs 4 months ago 6
@StrypaMan4Life Yeah it was sort of creepy
MrBurgundy76 2 weeks ago
Time travel -cosmic storm thingy- go in first, come out last.
MrGobbledegook 5 months ago
the endng is how its written in the original book, in the book he goes to an alien planet and discovers that there were humans there but apes outevolved them, when he gets back to earth he discovered thats happened on earth also
jimbo271uk 5 months ago
Wow! very very good explanation! now I'm confused
JoeCaliforniah 5 months ago
Comment removed
Pugnacio 5 months ago
Makes sense
bors615 5 months ago
Wow! very very good explanation! I'm not confused anymore
omguregood 5 months ago
My sources tell me that Leo landed on Ape Earth in 5021, so millions of years, no. And Tim Burton himself said this. "It was a reasonable cliffhanger that could be used in case Fox or another filmmaker wanted to do another movie."
Basically the ending was not supposed to make any sense, but it was more of a cliffhanger to be explained in a possible sequel.
And in all fairness it's just a bullshitty film with a bullshitty ending, get over it.
My sources: Wikipedia :P
maysonseyebrow 5 months ago
Can I just point out that the Planet of the Apes in Tim Burton's re-imagined film is definitely NOT Earth. Your video states that the multiple moons shown in orbit may be the result of this Earth being MILLIONS of years in the future. It isn't. You quite clearly showed that it is only about 400 years in the future. Thank you.
Dickie69Dude 6 months ago 15
I think after rise of the planet of the apes, the virus spreads from that pilot, and kills of of humanity. But the virus makes the apes smarter. So when the humans die out, They take over. But only very few humans survive.
pumpkin545 6 months ago
My take is that the writers just wanted to create an ending that was a twist. No need to have an explination, just wanted shock value
jonhaueter 6 months ago
my take: Instead he lands on the planet he just left from only arriving farther into its future.
Thade sets about to mimic the great civilization that he could have viewed via the computers of the Oberon that captured all of Earth's electromagnetic broadcasts according to its crew.
mouloudo 6 months ago
you are right leo is not in the new movie
arjunspot 6 months ago
@arjunspot The new movie has nothing to do it with this movie. Raise of the planet of apes is a reboot from the originals prequels from 1970's
GabXriel8 6 months ago
I think there’s a very deep message in this Rise of the Apes movie that creates a strong parallel to our own History……I mean think about it…its a story about a species that goes through a huge genetic leap literally overnight. Now ask yourself what species has actually gone through a huge genetic leap in real life? That’s right humans! And how much do we actually know about our own genetic leap………….Was it a natural or unnatural? Were we aided like the monkeys were in the new movie?
bgdream24 6 months ago
everyone confused about rise of the apes...rise of the planet of the apes is a prequel and reimagination to the ORIGINAL planet of the apes. this is time burtons adaptation.
tataatthedisco 6 months ago
Rise of the Apes is prequel for this movie, its explained how human extinct and how the apes rises. Its because of the 113.
Kiraich1 6 months ago
@Kiraich1 no
ProgressiveTool 6 months ago
@ProgressiveTool owh, sry for my mistake. :)
Kiraich1 6 months ago
Do a Google-search for a Fanfiction story called “Planet of the Apes 2: History Rewritten.” This narrative explains how Thade altered Earth’s history and then shows how Leo escapes and changes it all back.
DavetheGorilla1 6 months ago
that what i thought while watchin he come from alternate earth but it suck if there not connected but cant wait for the next one
JAI9ER 6 months ago
both remakes are awsome
JAI9ER 6 months ago
you should connect this to the latest movie because in the ending the virus is spreading and the setting is almost similar to the timeline that the 1st movie started
majara14 6 months ago
this explenation dosent make sense now that rise of the planets of the apes is out
Boomerangutan 6 months ago
I prefer the original films
theone225 6 months ago
What is the name of that device he was holding at the end of this video?
starguard 6 months ago
@starguard That was some Tracking device for finding his Mother Ship.
childlogiclabs 6 months ago
As said before, who cares about the explanations for a rubbish film?
Tim Burton should stick to his forte: dark, comic material like Sleepy Hollow or Beetlejuice. Because he's rubbish at more serious material.
If you really want to see a GREAT Planet of the Apes movie, stick to the original, or the new prequel, RISE - watched it yesterday and it is simply EXCELLENT.
Burton's version is so crap I didn't even remember its ending until I stumbled upon this.
Nice try, though.
Babilonium 6 months ago
@jnoempire. I know that that pod is not a time travel device but there's a worm hole right outside their planet. How the hell do you explain Leo jumping forward and backward in time as he entered and left that planet and how the hell do you explain earth being a ape dominant planet when Leo comes back...and not only that, how the hell do you explain a memorial of Thade specifically on earth when Thade is from a different time and a different planet. People like you are the ones responsible for
thejaynand 6 months ago
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed).
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) Their ship lands on that planet looking for Leo in 2029 but Leo gets bumped thosands of years in the future (by accidently entering some kinna worm hole) and lands on the same planet. Leo realizes that the apes aboard the mothership thrived on this new planet because of their intelligence (man trained...we also see later that Leo's ape lands the space pod perfectly where as Leo crash lands both times and so did his crew when they tried to land the mother
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) ship on this planet...implying that the apes aboard the ship were in some ways smarter than the humans even before the crash landing, their take over, and the evolution), superior strength (compared to humans) and natural surviving skills because they are wild animals (as compared to the softer humans). They rebelled against the humans on that ship, and did whatever necessary to survive which may have also included mating with human females forcefully to reproduce
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) for the survival and continuation of their species. This plus thousands of years of evolution may explain why they were more intelligent then traditional apes, had more human like appearance (face and body), and spoke the human language, hence becoming the dominating species on this new planet. The humans on the other hand escaped to the forest and survived as the premitive species on the planet and after thousands of years of evolution became dumb animal
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) like creatures. When Leo figures this out and goes back to earth, he goes a little farther behind then where he came from, that is he lands back in 2001 (the time the movie was made) instead of 2029. I say this because of the police cars, guns ,etc (notice the early 2000's model crown vics, the late 90's Chevy Suburban fire dept SUV, the semi auto guns the cops were carrying) were of the generation the movie was made rather then futuristic like stuff like the space ship,
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) the space pod, the communication gadget, high tech weapons from 2029. As far as the new "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is concerned, Caesar started his new revolution in the time this new movie was made which is 2011. So there no way these two movies were related bcuz otherwise the planet would already have been ape dominated in 2011 when Caesar was born. Also if you noticed when Leo comes back to earth it was general Thade instead on
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) President Lincoln (and not Caesar) and the writing on the wall said that it was a memorial temple in honor of General Thade. How did that happen??? The only thing I can think of is that General Thade was not killed and was caged alive in the command center of the mother ship. Thade being an intelligent ape would have seen the video log and would have researched over stuff on the bridge and have figured out a way to work this technology. Him having the only gun on
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) the planet (the gun was said to have the power of a thousand spears), he would have claimed command of the planet once he figured out a way to get out of his cage. And then all he had to do was to pull out the delta pod from the water, figure out a way to fix it and launch it and come to planet earth in a time thousands of years before the current time and restart the evolution chain of the ape dominated planet on earth this time. "Rise of the Planet of the Apes"
thejaynand 6 months ago
@thejaynand "...And then all he had to do was to pull out the delta pod from the water, figure out a way to fix it and launch it and come to planet earth in a time thousands of years before the current time and restart the evolution chain of the ape dominated planet on earth this time." I think you are wrong here. The pod is not a time travelling device. It only time travelled due to the spacial anomaly. Even if fixed it he would not have been able to time travel back into the past.
jnoempire 6 months ago
(continued...) is in no way connected to the "Planet of the Apes" other then the fact that it is based on the same concept which is if Apes were as smart as humans, they'll take over. If anything I would say that the "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is a remake of the 1972 film "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes" with it's own twist.
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) please disregard all my comments below. I apologize. I tried to fit everything on one page and it did not work so I tried to split'em up and I totally messed up bcuz I tried to do this all from my cell phone.
thejaynand 6 months ago
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed). T
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) the space pod, the communication gadget, high tech weapons from 2029. As far as the new "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" is concerned, Caesar started his new revolution in the time this new movie was made which is 2011. So there no way these two movies were related bcuz otherwise the planet would already have been ape dominated in 2011 when Caesar was born. Also if you noticed when Leo comes back to earth it was general Thade instead on
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) for the survival and continuation of their species. This plus thousands of years of evolution may explain why they were more intelligent then traditional apes, had more human like appearance (face and body), and spoke the human language, hence becoming the dominating species on this new planet. The humans on the other hand escaped to the forest and survived as the premitive species on the planet and after thousands of years of evolution became dumb animal
(continued...) like cre
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) ship on this planet...implying that the apes aboard the ship were in some ways smarter than the humans even before the crash landing, their take over, and the evolution), superior strength (compared to humans) and natural surviving skills because they are wild animals (as compared to the softer humans). They rebelled against the humans on that ship, and did whatever necessary to survive which may have also included mating with human females forcefully to reproduce
thejaynand 6 months ago
(continued...) Their ship lands on that planet looking for Leo in 2029 but Leo gets bumped thosands of years in the future (by accidently entering some kinna worm hole) and lands on the same planet. Leo realizes that the apes aboard the mothership thrived on this new planet because of their intelligence (man trained...we also see later that Leo's ape lands the space pod perfectly where as Leo crash lands both times and so did his crew when they tried to land the mother
thejaynand 6 months ago
You guys are all crazy. I don't think any of you guys actually watched either of the movies closely or paid any careful attention to the details. These movies are not related bcuz they are based in totally different time frames. The "Planet of the Apes" is based in the year 2029 where humans have advanced space travel equipment showing that they are stationed somewhere in outerspace in a huge and advance mothership with capabilities of landing on other planets (even though they crash landed).
thejaynand 6 months ago
So can someone explain to me How this ending and the ending in the Rise of the apes connect? like wtf
Svvagable 6 months ago
@Svvagable Exacly, Rise of The apes, the evolution starts in 2011, with Caesar, not the other ape. And there is no drug showed on this one. But if you recall, the fat scientist in the lab caught the disease from the virus that was meant to cure alzheimer's, but the apes that were tested gained intelligence with NO side affects the humans had, the fat dude then transferred the disease to the neighbour and it spreads out killing humans, so Leo went to Earth after rise of the apes
andrequeroz 6 months ago
@andrequeroz Yep this is prety much how it happendd
Botske7 6 months ago
@Svvagable This ending doesnt. I think the original does from the 60s.
MLdragon11 6 months ago
@Svvagable Rise of Apes have nothing to do with Burton's 2001 POTA. "Rise of Apes" is the (reimagined)PREQUEL to the Original POTA.
childlogiclabs 6 months ago 11
@childlogiclabs Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes is not a prequel, it is a reboot.
fletchers4 5 months ago
@fletchers4 It IS a prequel - but to the 1970's Planet of the Apes (not the 2001 one)
Pugnacio 5 months ago
@childlogiclabs That's why it is much less confusing and became better movie
ihalloway 5 months ago
@childlogiclabs yes it does. rise of the planet of the apes is a prequel to this one and shows how the apes took over earth. when the guy came back to earth it was full of apes. it shows how they took over. all the humans died off because the "cure for alzheimer's" does something to humans that apes are immune too.
6packjellyrolls 5 months ago
@childlogiclabs I really wouldn't even call it a prequel to the original. More of a reboot that happens to take place before the original. They reference the Icarus, true, but I've heard they plan to remake the original eventually, so I didn't see it as Charlton Heston's character actually being on the ship. But I guess if they never actually remake the original, no one would be too butthurt if one considers Rise an actual prequel to the original.
MightBiteYa 1 month ago
@Svvagable There's been 3 franchises of POTA.
1) 1960-1980 Series (Planet of the Apes, Beneath the Planet of the Apes, Escape from the Planet of the apes, and two other ones)
2) 2001 Reboot (Planet of the Apes)
3) 2011 Reboot (Rise of the Planet of the Apes)
So, yeah.
xxxOrcaman4xxx 5 months ago
if you recall, the fat scientist in the lab caught the disease from the virus that was meant to cure alzheimer's, but the apes that were tested gained intelligence with NO side affects the humans had, the fat dude then transferred the disease to the neighbour who went on a plane! This means that later on humans DIED OUT! with the orignal smart apes unaffected, and managed to reproduce with the same smart genes! Therefore the guy returning to Earth is Earth with humans extinct!!
asiant008 6 months ago
fantastic :D
jesseelf 6 months ago
Wow, man, i've barely seen anything of that movie, only short parts and the ending, but i really like the analystic look, with the highlights and such, really good job.
00420433 6 months ago
According to John Ross Bowie, this was originally a fake ending to throw off sites like Ain't it Cool News from spoiling the film. No idea how it actually made it into the final cut.
SlamDunkStudios 6 months ago
I find it amusing that you did this. Actually, it makes total sense.
Though didn't Leo land on the ape planet in Delta pod?
abomanalsnowkat112 6 months ago
Tim Burton screwed up planet of the apes, case closed. I thought rise was the best movie I've ever seen it was brilliant and can fit perfectly with the original movie even if they don't make a sequel, which I doubt theyll pass up that chance after the money it made...the 2001 film made a ton of dough but didn't get the word of mouth of this one.
kdj997 6 months ago
movie still sucks .....
kingGrimmjow95 6 months ago
thanks alot i really apreciate it i was like soo confused
Mstighty101 6 months ago
Comment removed
siralucard19 6 months ago
hate Tim Burton never seen a Tim Burton movie I liked in my life worse than that he take good movie ideas good storys and ruins them thank god he never got his stupid goth hands on Superman!
jimmy2k4o 6 months ago
@jimmy2k4o
So you've never seen Edward Scissorhands, Beetlejuice, Big Fish or Ed Wood? You're a retard.
KillSwitch2 6 months ago
@KillSwitch2 Havent seen Ed Wood but have seen the other 2 and stand by what a said terrible everything looks all gothic and depressing and just unplesant *shudder* there is just so so many better directors out there
jimmy2k4o 6 months ago
Just asking all you pros out there: I just watched Rise of the Planet of the Apes and it was a good movie. But is it a prequel to the Planet of the Apes (2001) or the original one? I mean, both have different stories but I want to know which story was Rise linked to?
NeedaBettrName 6 months ago
@NeedaBettrName neither bro....Its not a prequel its a reboot of the entire franchise, but i believe the movies to follow this one will be closer to the original charlton heston story, hope that helps
jimmy2k4o 6 months ago
@NeedaBettrName Planet of the Apes 2001 was a remake of Planet of the Apes 1968. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a prequel to those movies.
abench9698 6 months ago
@abench9698 That's it!
childlogiclabs 6 months ago
From what I understand, an astronaut was sent to Mars, got stuck. Caesar rises, and like the movie has shown a bit minutes after the credits, the human race will extinct due to the virus (humans will extinct, because our immune system is not able to fight the virus, but the apes' immune system is way stronger than ours). Did you see the pilot was infected, let blood all over the airport and all those destinations...RISE OF TPOTA WAS DA BOMB! DYING TO SEE THE SEQUEL. I hope they make it right.
Yoga1978 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So this movie has nothing to do with Rise of the Planet of the Apes?
josPerkins101 6 months ago
FUCK, I GET IT, U DUN HAV TO SHOW ALTERNATE EARTH SO MANY FUCKING TIMES!!!!
TheAunxFishball 6 months ago
cool, thanks
csollermoller 6 months ago
Leo time traveled back to his planet and timeline but his ship didnt take him back to his original time, the humans are almost dead and the monkeys have taken over, ceasar is dead in this time, i mean i was like 100 years after ceasars time, ceasar rised when he was going to space, lets wait for the next movie and we will see when the monkeys will make an civilization. and my guess is that they dont understand the human technology and will wipe out most of the earth with a bomb in a accident.
mulattens 6 months ago
@KittyKranker But I see why they wouldn't wanna re do the original. Its a classic and they don't wanna make it worse. So Im done talking about this. We are both right in different ways.
alienfoux 6 months ago
@KittyKranker And I watch movies that are older than me all the time? And not old enough to remember? Thats ridiculous. Because I do know. The Spider Man movies were the best super hero flicks ever. They made more money than any other super hero movie. So saying Im too young to remember is like saying you're too young to remember the original POTA, and yes I've seen the old ones. My mom is a fan.
alienfoux 6 months ago
@KittyKranker 1) They only did so good because they were the only Spider-Man movies. They had nothing to do with the original comics and story, while the new one is the real SM. 2) The new Spider -Man is a prequel. It focuses on his childhood and teenage life more than the old ones did hence, prequel to before he became Spider-Man. 3) I never said they're going to be making them EXACTLY the same as the 70's POTA, just rebooting it to a modern time with better special effects and acting.
alienfoux 6 months ago
@KittyKranker I dont believe that because... They are rebooting the Spider-Man series and they are starting with the prequel to Spider-Man. Focusing on his past and his teen years. Unlike the first 3 horrible movies. What happened was Universal or Paramount (I forgot who did the originals and the 2001 remake) lost the license to TPOTA. This new company bought it and are redoing the movies.
alienfoux 6 months ago
Alright I get what you're proposing, that not only did the storm at the end of the movie take him back to the past but that it also took him to an alternate/parallel universe as well... but shit, why did that alternate universe just HAVE to be populated by apes just like the future other dimension he just returned from?
liquidclock 6 months ago
@KittyKranker the writers have outlined two more films to be done. So, yea it kinda is :3
CtrlAltDeleteStudios 6 months ago
the original series has a background and explains it much better than this piece of shit. Also it strips all of the intelligence from the original.
riddickuv6 6 months ago
This movie still didnt make any sense even tho your explanation did- and the only reason 'an alternate earth' makes sense as a theory is because otherwise everything falls apart- its pure fudge which is better than the movie which was just crap.
KozakAttack 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A Rise of the Planet of the Apes explained everything in the easy way.
1. leo wemt some other place and time (before the virus infection)
2. leo return to the earth but already after 100+ year (after virus infection and most of human were dead)
so that the planet earth is already full of apes.
MYGTR 6 months ago
The original ending from the 60s movie was far better.
ghostdivision7 6 months ago
You used WAAAAAY too much time on "explaining" this. You used more than 7 minutes on a conclusion that isn't even very good or informative?! I want that time back! Maybe in an alternative timeline I didn't waste my time on this?
Kalle72 6 months ago
@KittyKranker Actually, they are rebooting the series. They are planning on making another one already.
alienfoux 6 months ago
This is completely wrong
swansob 6 months ago
i dont know what to make of it but what i think is that it dosent really matter why the movies with a time difference of 40 years dont fit together. all that matters is that all of the films are too show that animals are a lot smarter that we given them credit for even if they dont fit into modern society. and that if we treat them like the guy who tom felton played (applause) did then they will might just surprise you :D
icemagz 6 months ago
I liked this movie, i thought it was pretty good. Dont know why people hat it so much? Had action and Monkeys talking, what more do you want?
elhero213 6 months ago
Oh jesus, CAN YOU SAY MIND FUCKED?!?
Binjaaaa 6 months ago
19 people are from alternate earth
Moua 6 months ago 12
@Moua Ha ha Thanks.
childlogiclabs 6 months ago
Comment removed
kristjonk 6 months ago
Comment removed
kristjonk 6 months ago
i don't think this movie has anything to do with the new one or the original. No disrespect to the people that made it, but it was very bad. it mad a shame out of the original and the new is trying to make you forget it
jpaul0909 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
With all your explanation.. It''ll summed up to this... This movie sucks!!!
It's nowhere to be fitted in between the FIRST "the planet of the apes" C. 1968 and the latest "rise of the planet..." 2011.
So producer.
Whata shame... Whata shame...
Just for the sake of earning big in a comebacks.
o1an 6 months ago
Dude that is so wrong. In the new Planet of the Apes movie if you see in the backround a rocket takes off to mars. When those astronauts take off and are gone the apes take over. When they land years and years later the apes have all ready taken over. The one in 2001 makes no sense. The origanl is better because the guy discovers it is the earth because he sees the statue of librity.
JlecProductions 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thumbs up if you seeing this video after watching Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
soulbytes 6 months ago
mind... fuck..... gah.
0asian1nvasion0 6 months ago
But what about cesar i actually thought that ape lincon was cesar from the new movie because honestly the really look alike can some one plz explain me how the 2001 version and 2011 have in common? Plz :-)
mgs4vaderfan 6 months ago
@mgs4vaderfan supposedly, according to a few people I talked to "the rise of the planet of the apes" is a prequel, not sure if that's true but a few clues to make sense, the space shuttle launch in the new one, the newspaper that said "lost in space" and a few other things I can't remember kind of hint to this movie, anyways i hope thats right because i dont wanna feed you some Bullshit, if im wrong could someone please correct me.
MrPakiChan 6 months ago
@mgs4vaderfan Ill give you the best answer ever............OK......ready..................Similar titles and similar concept, theys two movies are in no way the same or related to each other, other than my two reasons given. The 2001 was a failed remake with a confusing story. The new one will be its own series of films, obviously in some ways based off the original films. In my opinon I think some snubby journalist needs to go find the damn script writer for the 2001 flm and get some answers
KcazTheMan 6 months ago
HOPEFULLY FOR LEO, THE MONKEY ABRAHAM LINCOLN FREED THE HUMANS.
drwhoandphysics 6 months ago
I thought everyone already knew the ending was an alternative earth? Duh!
I actually enjoyed the Mark Walberg version. i saw the original version on TV this afternoon and "Rise" at the cinema tonight. All very good.
djonutube 6 months ago
I like the explanation of the parallel unvierses theory. The Universe at the end of Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes seems to be the one set on The Rise of the Planet of the Apes Earth. The Earth feature in this movie is a Parallel Earth, but on the Rise's Earth. Most of the human race on the Rise's perish as a result of a virus Oddly, Rise seems to predict the next movie.
rgreed20081 6 months ago
90% of this video is good but at end.. ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH, ALTERNATE EARTH.... Yeah we get that. But we're watching this to find out WHY it is an alternate Earth. So the conclusion to video is....
HankerTube 6 months ago
You got the conclusion wrong. The conclusion was this movie sucked.
rrtt1 6 months ago
@rrtt1 if you don't have the science background, read The Physics of Star Trek which was written by real physicists who try to explain in layman terms quantum mechanics, string theory, general relativity, and time travel. Cause and effect, which is how we deduce and reason does not necessarily make sense. Even after reading that book, it was a bit difficult to comprehend the logic.
That aside, I hated the ending (because my mind can't wrap around the logic), but overall, it was a good movie.
dirtyvu 6 months ago
Meh... this theory is the easiest one to avoid thinking of a real posibility. With alternate universe, who cares about continuity anyway. I call bullshit on this.
TrapnestShinigami 6 months ago
It is possible. I seen this happen to Spiderman. He seen an alternate version of himself where he was more spider than man
MrYoungmoolababy 6 months ago
Nice work - well done.
Just one problem.
No one cares.
The movie stinks.
All hail Cesare and the reboot by Robert Wyatt.
F*ck Tim Burton - who I argue has never made a decent live action film.
Precious9Luv 6 months ago 12
this is the most epic explanation video... ever.
Huynhlicious 6 months ago 4
@Huynhlicious Thank you, thanks
childlogiclabs 6 months ago
Ok here's the condensed version.
1st storm = time travel and quite possibly an alternate universe but for the sake of keeping it simple let's just say he time traveled.
2nd storm = time travel and alternate reality.
Don't understand? Google it. I can't believe people are still confused about such events when entertainment has battered these subjects to yawn.
artbytandy 6 months ago
Comment removed
artbytandy 6 months ago
Funny thing is, I think you've probably thought out this ending more than the writers who came up with it. They just tried to come up with the most unexpected twist, even if it didn't make sense.
SharkAcademy 6 months ago
timetravel is some confusing shit plz stick to 2011 maybe 2020 the max if u want to tlk about futrue
smgboss1 6 months ago
THUMBS UP IF AGREE AND THINK leo went threw a time warp to earth in the future, and then when he left trying to return home he went through it again taking hime father into the future where the apes have advanced in technology, the only explanation is that thade got free and somehow got free and continued his conquest against the humans, and the apes defaced the licoln memorial and put thades face and i believe with all the time travel the machine got confused with what year it was and screwed
UkeMan1000 6 months ago
@UkeMan1000
Did you even watch the video? My initial conclusion was an alternate universe, your explanation is quite simply too far fetched and tiring, not to mention stupid when the explanation is quite clear if you take several seconds to even ponder on the subject. No, I will not thumbs you up because I believe you are an ape due to your lack of common sensibilities.
artbytandy 6 months ago
this editing is better than the movie itself.
mike7743 6 months ago 3