Se the video : "Noah's Flood: Mathematically Impossible." See also the Burgess Shales, which are the largest preCambrian deposits in the world. Thy have NO vertebrates: no fish,no amphibians,no dinosaurs,no reptiles, no birds, no mammals, no hominids, and no humans, completely VOIDING both Hovind and creationism, and the "flood" as a worldwide event. Too bad.
@InChristJesusOnly Yes, I have Dr. Brown's book and it is a great book. It's a model, but the best model that explains more anomalies than any other model, including plate tectonics.
Unfortunately I am not so sure with some of these.
Just in case, Supportisrael, you are clearly lacking in the basic concepts for the theory of evolution, geology, palaeontology and many other science areas.
I don't think you really looked at the fossils. They are layered like this: In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils, above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils and dinosaur fossils. No human or bunny fossils are found in any of these layers. No dating method used
This is not a Christian nation... At all. Or at least, as said by the President, not JUST. Also your argument is rather infantile, repeating scare tactics and that Jesus died for everyone, so you'd better believe in it or you'll burn in Hell. Don't you even realize that the concept of Hell wasn't even created until the Dark Ages? Many many many many many many many years after the death of said saviour. Check your facts and have a real argument next time. Peace be with you, my son.
When Jesus walked the earth, did he ONCE speak on the topic of creationism? Did he ONCE make it a priority to convince people of how the world came to be? Read Matthew 25 for what WAS a priority to him. By WASTING your time and talent trying to deny evolution, you are disobeying what Christ has called each of us to do.
Genesis 1: every creation story assumes a divine creation. So that's not why genesis 1 was recorded. The point isn't the process, it's what it meant. Notice what gets repeated throughout the chapter: "And God saw that it was good." That's a revolutionary idea in the ancient Near East: that all the universe is fundamentally good, or was initially so. Focus on the message, not the details. By arguing creationism, you're focused on the letter - like a Pharisee - and missing the spirit.
Secondly, why are you bothered with the fossil record at all? The fossil record is tangential evidence; the strongest proofs for evolution are homology and genetics, not the fossil record.
Third, why are you threatened by the facts? My faith in Christ is not shaken by the existence of gravity, the earth orbiting the sun (rather than the opposite), or evolution. Nor is Genesis 1 about creation -- it's not about HOW the world was made but what it MEANT when it was made.
If the fossil record is actually a record of animals' ability to escape rising floodwaters, then how do you explain PLANTS appearing at every layer, in varying degrees of sophistication? Do cedars appear in higher layers because cedar trees were better at running uphill than ferns were?
How do you explain some mice appearing higher than dinosaurs (did mice run faster than 40-foot dinosaurs?), or BIRDS appearing below deer? Why did fish and lobsters die?
So fossils are only found in hilly areas right? Oh, no. That's not right is it. You lied to us! And then threatened us that if we don't believe in your particular brand of sky pilot, he'll hurt us forever in hell. What a nice fellow.
These arguments are just gibberish and without corroborating evidence, any scientific value and stink up the place with the stench of post-hoc rationalisation and ugly, feeble minded sheep following. Go read a science book. Please.
OK, where are all the animals that were already dead at the time of the flood and are laying about in all manner of decomp? Hmmm? Why are sloths, armadillos and glyptodonts found above all fleet-footed dinosaurs like velociraptors? Hmmmm? Could it be you are wrong? Occam's Razor says, "Hell Yeah"! BTW, No flood! Period. Clear geologic science shows that from inspection of just ONE FORMATION! And I want my 04:19 back!
Too bad we only have 500 characters to comment with then i could provide you with the facts but then again you cited Kent "jailbird" Hovind who is known to be a rambling conspiracy theorist. Even Answers In Genesis published a statement telling creationists not to use Kent Hovind's arguments as they were too easy to debunk.
Excellent video. Think about this ye scoffers. Many parts of reality are auto-matic consequences of other parts. Up needs down, left - right, good - evil, light-darkness, order- chaos, heave-hell. Going to hell is an auto-matic consequence of 1. sin, 2. rejection of God's salvation from the consequence of sin. So if you end up in hail. It's your own fault for rejection the savior, Jesus Christ. Not God's!
i reject christ, god and the holy spirit mwahahahaha
also to say 'christians in america need to take back their country with any means necessary' is out of line. I'm sure you don't really mean 'any' means but still you've got to be careful what you're suggesting people do.
could you please explain how the pyramids seem to survive untouched and nobody EXCEPT the bible felt the need to say anything about this i.e. the egyptians.
Among many, many problems with the fastest surviving longer theory
This is just silly. If fossils really formed in this manner, they would form on slopes (as your picture clearly shows). But even then, we do not find this pattern in the fossil record: we find plenty of ancient birds under modern reptiles, and human fossils deep in valleys.
99.9% of all species that have ever lived are now dead.
The piltdown man was debunked by real scientists. Modern pre-humans like Australopithecus are excellent examples of transitional forms.
Excellent video, people rather believe in fables of monkeys, evolutionary soups, and in the Big Ban rather than understand that the earth is a result of an amazing creator.
if this was true, and Noah was true, then there would be two things
1. most fishes and insects dont have nostrils so they wont be on the arc as venomfangx stated, i hvnt read the bible so ill assume tats the story of noah, so shouldnt theyre be no fishes or insects??
2. if there was only two of each species there would have been a lot of incest, which i think is a sin?? not sure and second that would cause all of the current species to have horrible immune system...no way they wud hv survived
The sea creatures died first and sunk to the bottom.
These science deniers also use the fossilised sea creatures found on Mt Everest as proof of the flood (instead of gaining basic knowledge of tectonic movent).
If the sea critters died and were buried first, why are they on top of a mountain?
so you believe in this utterly evil, sadistic god that, if you refuse his offer, will torture you eternally as hard as he can? If we think of how sick and depraved a human would have to be to burn their own child alive, how monstrously evil would a god have to be to create the devilish system you describe? BTW: If there was any Jesus knocking on my door, I'd sure let him in for a chat, but there is none. Could it have something to do with him being dead for 2000 years?
explain to me how did noah gather so many different animal in so little time,you darn well know some animal don't live in the middle east.GLOBAR WARMING WHAT?
I think we should find this god and kill it! since it wants to do so much harm to us after we die! My grandmother was born and lived and died on a Thai island and had no knowledge of this christian god. Is she burning in hell right now? I've heard it said "ignorance is no excuse"... but it kind of is though.
caseagainstfaith, of course I am not joking. Mostly these videos modernize and rehash arguments already presented by Hovind, AIG, etc... How are they they dumb?
@supportisrael35 As it's fairly obvious that you haven't given the slightest thought to what all these suppositions might actually MEAN before posting this you are either a POE, or quite sad. I'm thinking former. But I would be glad to go line by line and show why these arguments are false. I mean, ice meteor? Gimme a freaking break man. The minium speed for a strike would still release a huge amount of energy as heat. Cooking all life.
@supportisrael35 How are they dumb? Well, for example... If the fossil record is actually a record of animals' ability to escape rising floodwaters, then how do you explain PLANTS appearing at every layer, in varying degrees of sophistication? Do cedars appear in higher layers because cedar trees were better at running uphill than ferns were?
How do you explain some mice appearing higher than dinosaurs (did mice run faster than 40-foot dinosaurs?), or BIRDS appearing below deer?
Neph I agree with what israel says. But what you said is still plausible. Neph and israel you and me + about 7 others will form an alliance. I have an idea in mind. My retirment will be temporary not permenant.
Hovind is right about many things, but he has the machanics of the flood wrong. The water that ejected from the earth into space and came back down on the earth as ice and snow caused the "ice age", not the flood. The ocean levels are still rising because it is all melting. Global warming is real - it's simply the earth returning to it's pope-to-pole tropical state it posessed prior to the flood. That's why so many coastal cultures are now under water.
The water that came from inside the earth to flood the earth (not from space) was too warm, not too cold. That is what killed most sea life during the flood. Plankton thrive in cold water, and the Cretaceous Layer is made of plankton which died because of the hot water from within the earth.
Trilobites are all buried in the Cambrian to Devonian layers. Eryons, another arthopod, are all buried in the Jurassic layers.
ALL of the fossils found are buried in the layers, species by species. Even bottom dwelling arthropods are found in different layers according to their species and their evolutionary time line.
THEY ARE NOT BURIED IN ACCORDANCE TO THEIR HABITAT.
hahaha, this video states that "Kent Hovind explains.........." omg I am on the floor, sombody get a defibulator before I die..............how can any logical human being take anything Kent H. says as fact. He is the laughing stock of the real science world!!! Isn't he in jail, getting life lessons from bubba?
Israel I would like to introduce you to SHAWNLARGE. Contact him sometime. He thinks smart like you do! I sent him this great vid and will send you one of his. Great work and peace out.
So, SupportIsreal35, where are the Whale fossils? They should've sunk with the fish, yet the bones are found higher up in the layers.
And how about the Polar bears fossils? The would've been amongst the first of the large land mammals to perish, but again, found higher up.
And are you also saying that EVERY human was able to climb a tree or other high place? Some in lower lying lands would've been deposited with the lizards etc. And rabbits too. There would been a mix up if it happened your way
Wow your dumb. how can you flood a planet with a finite amount of water? and where did this water go when it was over? you dont even have the balls to be on your vids, using lame mac-speech is such a copout
@supportisrael35 you do realize by utilizing that "pot/kettle" thing there you are in fact saying you are both idiots? However, I don't see you even attempting to answer "where did all this water go when it was over?" Also please do a bit more research into fossils, ALL fossils are in fact transitional or "missing links". Finally, please stop quoting from that obviously corrupted, man tainted, and wholly flawed book. There is nothing divine about it, it is a psychotics manifesto, nothing more.
@supportisrael35 really? err...how about refuting that then, how can there have been a global flood that covered the earth 2 feet above the top of Mt. Everest (29,000 ft.)? To extend that globally would require 1,091,388,460,971 cubic KILOMETERS of water, that's over 4 times the amount of water found on Earth today, and even if this comet did have that much water, where did it go after the flood, if it evaporated the vapor would still be in the air, and it doesn't have the energy to escape
@supportisrael35 (cont'd) to escape Earth's gravity...so where did it all go? And I think you're confusing FINITE with INfinite, Finite means a limited supply or quantity, INfinite means a limitless supply or quantity...so come on man, refute it, where did the water go? Where did it come from? Oh and people don't learn about Piltdown Man when learning evolution, they learn about Lucy, Astraulopithicus Afarensis, Homo Erectus, etc. There is so much crap in this video, I don't know where to begin!
well the water could have come from icy meteorites which have been discovered in space and scientists also say that the majority of water on earth has come from such meteorites
PROBLEM: meteorites of such dimensions to bring so much water all at once would be too big and would simply blow up the earth and turn it into mere dust in space
, as for where it has gone, earth is loosing thousands of tons of gases every day, gases like air and vapors of water.
Aside from the water we already have it would take in the neighborhood of 4.5 billion cubic kilometers of water (vastly more than there is on earth currently). That would require quite a bit of doing to get rid of. The other explanation is that the landmasses immediately sank then re-emerged. But this makes piffle of the creationist argument as it would cause such turbulence (think the recent film 2012 only much worse) as to make it a laughable notion that a primitive wooden barge survived it.
Point of the story is this vid is absolute garbage. oh and i got more, raising water levels wouldn't create the fossil layering we see in rock outcroppings today. Fossilization takes place over thousands and millions of years under accumulated settlement under emergence pressure. a fast flood would put all the life present at that time in the exact same layer of rock. Go back to school supportisrael35
all the videos trying to explain creationism or to prove evolution wrong are complete garbage... there is nowhere a video that tries to explain scientifically creationism that isn't stupid/has no lies in it.
Supportisreal your work and videos are a godsend and great! I agree with you! And I give this video 5/5 stars *****. Also, I have been debating EternalSkeptic and Atf over on Taa's God sucks video if you want to join in the debate. Pay no attention to eternalmoron or jackassthdripper; They are jealous of you and or your work, knowledge and wisdom. Keep up the good work and God bless. ;)
"If the worldwide sequence of fossils are the products of Noah's flood and its resultant fallout, why, then - at no place on this vast earth - do we find dinosaurs and large mammals in the same strata; why are trilobites never with mammals (not even marine mammals), but always in strata below? Surely some retarded elephant would be keeping company with dinosaurs, some valiant trilobite swimming hard for thirty-nine days and winning an exalted upper berth with mammals."
Tsk tsk. What would a paleontologist know about these things? We should just take Kent Hovind's word for it and not think about such things. As Luther himself said "reason is the devil's harlot".
why take someones word for granted? all humans are sinners so he must be too, why not think about such things? why did god bless us with such a big and intelligent brain compared to the animals? didn't he give this brain to us in order to think and not simply believe every sinner?
Se the video : "Noah's Flood: Mathematically Impossible." See also the Burgess Shales, which are the largest preCambrian deposits in the world. Thy have NO vertebrates: no fish,no amphibians,no dinosaurs,no reptiles, no birds, no mammals, no hominids, and no humans, completely VOIDING both Hovind and creationism, and the "flood" as a worldwide event. Too bad.
Atalatl 9 hours ago
Check (Hydro-plate Theory ...
InChristJesusOnly 2 months ago
@InChristJesusOnly Yes, I have Dr. Brown's book and it is a great book. It's a model, but the best model that explains more anomalies than any other model, including plate tectonics.
AndyG792 2 weeks ago
This is obviously satire.
Mick116 6 months ago
@Mick116 I do hope so,
Unfortunately I am not so sure with some of these.
Just in case, Supportisrael, you are clearly lacking in the basic concepts for the theory of evolution, geology, palaeontology and many other science areas.
seanet1310 3 months ago
gregrutz 11 months ago
This is not a Christian nation... At all. Or at least, as said by the President, not JUST. Also your argument is rather infantile, repeating scare tactics and that Jesus died for everyone, so you'd better believe in it or you'll burn in Hell. Don't you even realize that the concept of Hell wasn't even created until the Dark Ages? Many many many many many many many years after the death of said saviour. Check your facts and have a real argument next time. Peace be with you, my son.
RockTheRagnarok 1 year ago
Dinosaurs
SillyCyban 1 year ago
When Jesus walked the earth, did he ONCE speak on the topic of creationism? Did he ONCE make it a priority to convince people of how the world came to be? Read Matthew 25 for what WAS a priority to him. By WASTING your time and talent trying to deny evolution, you are disobeying what Christ has called each of us to do.
SoulMindHeart 1 year ago
Genesis 1: every creation story assumes a divine creation. So that's not why genesis 1 was recorded. The point isn't the process, it's what it meant. Notice what gets repeated throughout the chapter: "And God saw that it was good." That's a revolutionary idea in the ancient Near East: that all the universe is fundamentally good, or was initially so. Focus on the message, not the details. By arguing creationism, you're focused on the letter - like a Pharisee - and missing the spirit.
SoulMindHeart 1 year ago
Secondly, why are you bothered with the fossil record at all? The fossil record is tangential evidence; the strongest proofs for evolution are homology and genetics, not the fossil record.
Third, why are you threatened by the facts? My faith in Christ is not shaken by the existence of gravity, the earth orbiting the sun (rather than the opposite), or evolution. Nor is Genesis 1 about creation -- it's not about HOW the world was made but what it MEANT when it was made.
SoulMindHeart 1 year ago
This argument is so unintelligent ...
If the fossil record is actually a record of animals' ability to escape rising floodwaters, then how do you explain PLANTS appearing at every layer, in varying degrees of sophistication? Do cedars appear in higher layers because cedar trees were better at running uphill than ferns were?
How do you explain some mice appearing higher than dinosaurs (did mice run faster than 40-foot dinosaurs?), or BIRDS appearing below deer? Why did fish and lobsters die?
SoulMindHeart 1 year ago
So fossils are only found in hilly areas right? Oh, no. That's not right is it. You lied to us! And then threatened us that if we don't believe in your particular brand of sky pilot, he'll hurt us forever in hell. What a nice fellow.
These arguments are just gibberish and without corroborating evidence, any scientific value and stink up the place with the stench of post-hoc rationalisation and ugly, feeble minded sheep following. Go read a science book. Please.
sharkytrfc 1 year ago
OK, where are all the animals that were already dead at the time of the flood and are laying about in all manner of decomp? Hmmm? Why are sloths, armadillos and glyptodonts found above all fleet-footed dinosaurs like velociraptors? Hmmmm? Could it be you are wrong? Occam's Razor says, "Hell Yeah"! BTW, No flood! Period. Clear geologic science shows that from inspection of just ONE FORMATION! And I want my 04:19 back!
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
Too bad we only have 500 characters to comment with then i could provide you with the facts but then again you cited Kent "jailbird" Hovind who is known to be a rambling conspiracy theorist. Even Answers In Genesis published a statement telling creationists not to use Kent Hovind's arguments as they were too easy to debunk.
anarimus 1 year ago
wow gods a fucking asshole
aderandie2 1 year ago
wtf hahahaaaa this is so retarded has this guy even talked to an paleontologist
aderandie2 1 year ago
wow, this guy ist sick
that he takes hovinds crap seriously is bad enough, but when he called the school system satanic, i became really scared by that lunatic
lordofpete 1 year ago
A satanic school system? Christian americans should take back their country by any means necessary? Global warming is a religion?
Provide evidence for your assertions. The more I listen the more it seems that you are part of a doomsday cult.
Morahg 1 year ago
What rubbish you do spout! No wonder you disguised your voice!
mousegeek 1 year ago
After watching this video..
I am convinced..
And I deny the holy spirit and his son...
S00rabh 1 year ago
Excellent video. Think about this ye scoffers. Many parts of reality are auto-matic consequences of other parts. Up needs down, left - right, good - evil, light-darkness, order- chaos, heave-hell. Going to hell is an auto-matic consequence of 1. sin, 2. rejection of God's salvation from the consequence of sin. So if you end up in hail. It's your own fault for rejection the savior, Jesus Christ. Not God's!
Howie47 1 year ago
i reject christ, god and the holy spirit mwahahahaha
also to say 'christians in america need to take back their country with any means necessary' is out of line. I'm sure you don't really mean 'any' means but still you've got to be careful what you're suggesting people do.
goonerh1 1 year ago
could you please explain how the pyramids seem to survive untouched and nobody EXCEPT the bible felt the need to say anything about this i.e. the egyptians.
Among many, many problems with the fastest surviving longer theory
goonerh1 1 year ago
Just look at this please and tell me if you have any comeback; this is proper science we're dealing with:
h t t p://w w w .talkorigins.o r g/faqs/hovind/howgood.h t m l
goonerh1 1 year ago
This is just silly. If fossils really formed in this manner, they would form on slopes (as your picture clearly shows). But even then, we do not find this pattern in the fossil record: we find plenty of ancient birds under modern reptiles, and human fossils deep in valleys.
99.9% of all species that have ever lived are now dead.
The piltdown man was debunked by real scientists. Modern pre-humans like Australopithecus are excellent examples of transitional forms.
FiverBeyond 1 year ago
Excellent video, people rather believe in fables of monkeys, evolutionary soups, and in the Big Ban rather than understand that the earth is a result of an amazing creator.
wflor001 1 year ago
if this was true, and Noah was true, then there would be two things
1. most fishes and insects dont have nostrils so they wont be on the arc as venomfangx stated, i hvnt read the bible so ill assume tats the story of noah, so shouldnt theyre be no fishes or insects??
2. if there was only two of each species there would have been a lot of incest, which i think is a sin?? not sure and second that would cause all of the current species to have horrible immune system...no way they wud hv survived
aznboylikes8 1 year ago
Did he say kent hovind??? did he really say that?? What a reference!
franczazou 2 years ago
Federal Judge John E Jones III of the US District Court Ruled That it is creationism is not science.
arizonaviking 2 years ago
Great video!! 5 stars.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
to bad the fossil record does not look like this
but lets not let a little thing like reality ruin your vid
noliesundead 2 years ago
Ice meteor!! hahahhahah... Thanks, that was a good one.
hugesinker 2 years ago
Is this a joke :)?
Bielak999 2 years ago
I think it's utterly childish to take the title of thunderfoots series and just turn it around - can't you come up with something on your own?
Besides that - the video sucks. Both - content and editing. Can i say selfdelusion?
THAT'S WHY WE LAUGH ABOUT YOU CREATIONISTS.
manzed 2 years ago
JesusPaid4You good to see you here! God bless you to! I sent you 4 or 5 vids besides this one. Supportisrael is great! Take care.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
The sea creatures died first and sunk to the bottom.
These science deniers also use the fossilised sea creatures found on Mt Everest as proof of the flood (instead of gaining basic knowledge of tectonic movent).
If the sea critters died and were buried first, why are they on top of a mountain?
They debunk their own arguement!
aardwolf71 2 years ago
You are only about 300 years behind the rest of us. Unfortunately we probably can't wait for you to catch up.
Fails on every level.
wtargentina 2 years ago
Shouldn't there be some human fossils in the lower layers, since not everyone is going to escape up the mountains or cling to logs?
DesdinovaImaginos 2 years ago
PS: All these Hovindisms have long been debunked by Potholer54, goto /watch?v=_sD_7rxYoZY
dasGagaTier 2 years ago
@dasGagaTier on the fossil record: /watch?v=FfSvktyxVYA
dasGagaTier 2 years ago
so you believe in this utterly evil, sadistic god that, if you refuse his offer, will torture you eternally as hard as he can? If we think of how sick and depraved a human would have to be to burn their own child alive, how monstrously evil would a god have to be to create the devilish system you describe? BTW: If there was any Jesus knocking on my door, I'd sure let him in for a chat, but there is none. Could it have something to do with him being dead for 2000 years?
dasGagaTier 2 years ago
You forgot about birds? You know, those things that can fly and would have lasted longer than humans. Also not forgetting birds than can swim.
Or all those insects that can fly?
The mammals that can swim?
Your little theory only works if you just accept it and don't actually think about it, much like the bible in that respect.
TychoCelchu 2 years ago
Hilarious! The fossil record? You mean the one that you and yours don't believe in?
The same fossil record that backs up the theory of evolution?
Hahahahaha!
Pretty convenient use of the fossil record, don't you think?
What a loon, ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!
iamsosquid 2 years ago
explain to me how did noah gather so many different animal in so little time,you darn well know some animal don't live in the middle east.GLOBAR WARMING WHAT?
gio957 2 years ago
I think we should find this god and kill it! since it wants to do so much harm to us after we die! My grandmother was born and lived and died on a Thai island and had no knowledge of this christian god. Is she burning in hell right now? I've heard it said "ignorance is no excuse"... but it kind of is though.
McPrfctday 2 years ago
caseagainstfaith, of course I am not joking. Mostly these videos modernize and rehash arguments already presented by Hovind, AIG, etc... How are they they dumb?
supportisrael35 2 years ago
@supportisrael35 As it's fairly obvious that you haven't given the slightest thought to what all these suppositions might actually MEAN before posting this you are either a POE, or quite sad. I'm thinking former. But I would be glad to go line by line and show why these arguments are false. I mean, ice meteor? Gimme a freaking break man. The minium speed for a strike would still release a huge amount of energy as heat. Cooking all life.
NorthForkFisherman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@supportisrael35 How are they dumb? Well, for example... If the fossil record is actually a record of animals' ability to escape rising floodwaters, then how do you explain PLANTS appearing at every layer, in varying degrees of sophistication? Do cedars appear in higher layers because cedar trees were better at running uphill than ferns were?
How do you explain some mice appearing higher than dinosaurs (did mice run faster than 40-foot dinosaurs?), or BIRDS appearing below deer?
SoulMindHeart 1 year ago
caseagainstfaith, The Bible says what it says regardless of how bad you want it to go away
supportisrael35 2 years ago
go back to school, seriously.
cujomade101 2 years ago
Neph I agree with what israel says. But what you said is still plausible. Neph and israel you and me + about 7 others will form an alliance. I have an idea in mind. My retirment will be temporary not permenant.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
Nephilim good to see you here. Thanks for coming. And israel's video series is great! Atheists are ignorant.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
Hovind is right about many things, but he has the machanics of the flood wrong. The water that ejected from the earth into space and came back down on the earth as ice and snow caused the "ice age", not the flood. The ocean levels are still rising because it is all melting. Global warming is real - it's simply the earth returning to it's pope-to-pole tropical state it posessed prior to the flood. That's why so many coastal cultures are now under water.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
The water that came from inside the earth to flood the earth (not from space) was too warm, not too cold. That is what killed most sea life during the flood. Plankton thrive in cold water, and the Cretaceous Layer is made of plankton which died because of the hot water from within the earth.
NephilimFree 2 years ago
Trilobites are all buried in the Cambrian to Devonian layers. Eryons, another arthopod, are all buried in the Jurassic layers.
ALL of the fossils found are buried in the layers, species by species. Even bottom dwelling arthropods are found in different layers according to their species and their evolutionary time line.
THEY ARE NOT BURIED IN ACCORDANCE TO THEIR HABITAT.
FAIL!!!!!!!!
aardwolf71 2 years ago
hahaha, this video states that "Kent Hovind explains.........." omg I am on the floor, sombody get a defibulator before I die..............how can any logical human being take anything Kent H. says as fact. He is the laughing stock of the real science world!!! Isn't he in jail, getting life lessons from bubba?
TeamDarwin1809 2 years ago
Israel I would like to introduce you to SHAWNLARGE. Contact him sometime. He thinks smart like you do! I sent him this great vid and will send you one of his. Great work and peace out.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
So, SupportIsreal35, where are the Whale fossils? They should've sunk with the fish, yet the bones are found higher up in the layers.
And how about the Polar bears fossils? The would've been amongst the first of the large land mammals to perish, but again, found higher up.
And are you also saying that EVERY human was able to climb a tree or other high place? Some in lower lying lands would've been deposited with the lizards etc. And rabbits too. There would been a mix up if it happened your way
aardwolf71 2 years ago
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do" Benjamin
Franklin
arizonaviking 2 years ago
why are all the humans sinners? weren't we all created by God? or is he a sinner as well?
bv90andy 2 years ago
Wow your dumb. how can you flood a planet with a finite amount of water? and where did this water go when it was over? you dont even have the balls to be on your vids, using lame mac-speech is such a copout
BOONDOCKVERITAS 2 years ago
"how can you flood a planet with a finite amount of water?"
IDIOT! And you call me dumb? Pot, meet kettle.
supportisrael35 2 years ago
umm that's not an answer hotshot. icecaps don't hold enough H20 to flood all land mass.
so where did this magical water come from and go? provide so actual evidence, not just blind speculation
BOONDOCKVERITAS 2 years ago
@supportisrael35 you do realize by utilizing that "pot/kettle" thing there you are in fact saying you are both idiots? However, I don't see you even attempting to answer "where did all this water go when it was over?" Also please do a bit more research into fossils, ALL fossils are in fact transitional or "missing links". Finally, please stop quoting from that obviously corrupted, man tainted, and wholly flawed book. There is nothing divine about it, it is a psychotics manifesto, nothing more.
eire138 1 year ago
@supportisrael35 really? err...how about refuting that then, how can there have been a global flood that covered the earth 2 feet above the top of Mt. Everest (29,000 ft.)? To extend that globally would require 1,091,388,460,971 cubic KILOMETERS of water, that's over 4 times the amount of water found on Earth today, and even if this comet did have that much water, where did it go after the flood, if it evaporated the vapor would still be in the air, and it doesn't have the energy to escape
calthopian 1 year ago
@supportisrael35 (cont'd) to escape Earth's gravity...so where did it all go? And I think you're confusing FINITE with INfinite, Finite means a limited supply or quantity, INfinite means a limitless supply or quantity...so come on man, refute it, where did the water go? Where did it come from? Oh and people don't learn about Piltdown Man when learning evolution, they learn about Lucy, Astraulopithicus Afarensis, Homo Erectus, etc. There is so much crap in this video, I don't know where to begin!
calthopian 1 year ago
well the water could have come from icy meteorites which have been discovered in space and scientists also say that the majority of water on earth has come from such meteorites
PROBLEM: meteorites of such dimensions to bring so much water all at once would be too big and would simply blow up the earth and turn it into mere dust in space
, as for where it has gone, earth is loosing thousands of tons of gases every day, gases like air and vapors of water.
PROBLEM it would take billions of years
bv90andy 2 years ago
Aside from the water we already have it would take in the neighborhood of 4.5 billion cubic kilometers of water (vastly more than there is on earth currently). That would require quite a bit of doing to get rid of. The other explanation is that the landmasses immediately sank then re-emerged. But this makes piffle of the creationist argument as it would cause such turbulence (think the recent film 2012 only much worse) as to make it a laughable notion that a primitive wooden barge survived it.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 2 years ago
like I said PROBLEM it would take billions of years" but I reached the limit of characters
bv90andy 2 years ago
I was concurring with you
JACKtheRIPP3R189 2 years ago
Point of the story is this vid is absolute garbage. oh and i got more, raising water levels wouldn't create the fossil layering we see in rock outcroppings today. Fossilization takes place over thousands and millions of years under accumulated settlement under emergence pressure. a fast flood would put all the life present at that time in the exact same layer of rock. Go back to school supportisrael35
BOONDOCKVERITAS 2 years ago
*immense pressure* silly me
BOONDOCKVERITAS 2 years ago
all the videos trying to explain creationism or to prove evolution wrong are complete garbage... there is nowhere a video that tries to explain scientifically creationism that isn't stupid/has no lies in it.
bv90andy 2 years ago
Anyone who gets their scientific knowledge from "Mr" Kent Hovind is either (a) stupid or (b) insane.
erehwon80 2 years ago 4
Frother
You haven't been 'debating' anything.
You post little snippets of dogma and bare assertions, then try to get others to agree with you.
Yea-
I'm 'jealous' of a clown who would take this video seriously.
EternalSkeptic77 2 years ago 4
This is now in my faves list.
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
Supportisreal your work and videos are a godsend and great! I agree with you! And I give this video 5/5 stars *****. Also, I have been debating EternalSkeptic and Atf over on Taa's God sucks video if you want to join in the debate. Pay no attention to eternalmoron or jackassthdripper; They are jealous of you and or your work, knowledge and wisdom. Keep up the good work and God bless. ;)
TheForthcoming1 2 years ago
Thanks TheForthcoming1. God bless you too.
supportisrael35 2 years ago
"If the worldwide sequence of fossils are the products of Noah's flood and its resultant fallout, why, then - at no place on this vast earth - do we find dinosaurs and large mammals in the same strata; why are trilobites never with mammals (not even marine mammals), but always in strata below? Surely some retarded elephant would be keeping company with dinosaurs, some valiant trilobite swimming hard for thirty-nine days and winning an exalted upper berth with mammals."
- Stephen J. Gould
EternalSkeptic77 2 years ago 3
Tsk tsk. What would a paleontologist know about these things? We should just take Kent Hovind's word for it and not think about such things. As Luther himself said "reason is the devil's harlot".
JACKtheRIPP3R189 2 years ago
why take someones word for granted? all humans are sinners so he must be too, why not think about such things? why did god bless us with such a big and intelligent brain compared to the animals? didn't he give this brain to us in order to think and not simply believe every sinner?
bv90andy 2 years ago
I was being sarcastic.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 2 years ago
sarcasm is hard to spot when it comes to creationists because they are stupider then you try to make them look :P
bv90andy 2 years ago
Very true, they transcend satire.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 2 years ago
"transcend satire" well said, I have to remember this phrase!
bv90andy 2 years ago
What exactly do you mean "any means" going to start killing people? Awsome
harvellt 2 years ago