The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
In the majority of these videos, the car gets the bulk of the credit, but it's the battery that's makes this breakthrough possible. Even now many variations of the Li-Ion battery are either being or are waiting to be tested. Since this car have been out, there have already been improvements made to Li-Ion batteries.
Must have a big bridge rectifier in it. I'd love to get my hands on one and take it apart. Looks like some kick butt technology. Hats of to the folks who got this together. I hope there isn't to many spade connectors as they change resistance when they get warm and when heated over time. All the money to troubleshoot this when they can't do what we have without charging mad money.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Electric cars are cool. But there is just one huge thing (and a few other smaller ones) i don't like about them. Their lack of sound! You take away that totally awesome sound that only an internal combustion engine can make, you're taking away the second greatest thing about high performance cars. As far as sound goes, no "drill on steroids" will ever replace the sound a Ferrari v12, or a bored out, stroked, huge cam, piece of American muscle. Electric cars just don't have the drama, or passio
What? If that was the only BIG problem for an electric car I had already had one.
The BIG problem, rather, is that there isn't an electic supply net on countries and you're basically forced to recharge your car at home and nowhere else. But... the passio and the drama of a 1800's based engine is the last thing ever.
we just need to wait a few years until they get better baterys cuz those suck and have to get exchanged in like 1 year ... (half of the car price are the baterys) xD
so yeah I'll get one when they get under 40.000$ and the'll do atleast 150 miles per charge (200miles maybe)
The simple fact remains that today's electric cars best serve as second family cars for limited distance driving.
While the battery technology needs dramatic improvements, it wouldn't hurt to throw solar panels on the roof.
Photovoltaics still need lots of work to "solar assist" e-cars. However, solar charging for 8 hours while you work may be the difference between driving home and getting towed.
This car as a 250km+ of range at normal driving, so why are you guys still afraid of the range limit? Is not like everyone drives 300km or more for their day job. You charge your car over night go to job, return and them plug in again and so you will never have to worry about getting stuck with power.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Everyone familiar with electric cars knows the Tesla technology is brainless and will be totally unreliable - witness one tester running out of juice at 55 miles - the car didn't run out of juice - that would be impossible after only 55 miles - the car has over 15,000 electrical connections to its 8700 obsolete 1st generation li ion flashlight batteries. The connections
just stopped conducting juice. The Tesla technology is amateur hour, automotive style.
3.5 hrs to charge- thats actually pretty quick considering how far you can go. I mean seriously: Except for salesman, who drives 250 miles every day???? and even if you have to drive 100 miles to work (???)- then you work 7-9 hrs, right? So your car can charge.... I mean its probaply not the car you take your family for a cross-country trip in. I'd buy it- Just dont have the cash though :)
Well, we don't yet have the technology to do it. It's still in question if that technology will ever exist. Many are working very hard on it though and we can keep our fingers crossed. The support of EEStor by Lockheed Martin is some fairly solid ground for optimism. EEStor has released some more tests as well and a car using their super capacitor can be hoped to come from ZENN around fall this year.
I am glad that Telsa is offering a fast charger on the Model S line, they can charges in about 45 minutes, even without the updates that you are speaking of!
I am sure there is a point you critics are trying to make here... fact is this is the future and internal combustion engines are old technology. you can like electric cars or not but they are the future and I for one am looking forward to it!
You're preaching to the choir mate. I was just clarifying the facts. I wouldn't want to make the current progress of electric cars to look too much better than it really is lol.
Also didjya hear didjya hear? Look up Hitachi's lithium ion battery. I'm excited ^_^
Still not convinced of EEStor but I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
till they dont make the batteries more usable this kind of cars are ONLY nice gadget nothing more. only idiot can wait 16 hours to charge car LOL. maybe this works for lazy americans who ride for milk to shop but for any normal car user 200 km/s on one charging is totally not enought
3.5 Is still far too long, and although I find parts of marcus's statement crass or somewhat jejune, I have duly noted his opinion. He is correct about it not being a viable option for the average user. Diesel is still a better option by far.
Still very new technology development. It's getting better in leaps and bounds. There is technology already functional that allows for a charge time of a few minutes, it's all a question of research, testing and of bringing the price down over time.
I would much rather prefer to see the myte engine go into production or a comparable engine. You can convert a simple gas engine say a chevy 350sb to run on pure hydrogen, and you can make a simple tank system with rods running into water and have hydrogen on demand. Hydrogen on demand much safer due to not storing the gas, and cheaper than buying it since you pump water. Look it up; much more cost effective, runs better, cheaper, and still get to toss around great engines.
Hydrogen on demand could never really work in the way you're referring for that application. You need electricity to produce the hydrogen via electrolysis and you still probably couldn't produce it as fast as your car could burn through it. You would need hydrogen tanks and hydrogen isn't a very efficient fuel when compared to pure electrical power, although at least it's better than petrol. I will miss gas engines though. I'm a car nut so yah, I'd have to.
Now cut the weight! We need newer batteries that hold more and weigh less. The main thing weighing down this car is the batteries and it already does 0-60 in four seconds. You can only imagine what its performance and range could be.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Tesla vehicle earns credit for innovation, but until they can create a sedan that gets the range of 200 miles plus, with four seats, four passengers, and a trunk full of items from the market. I think we should remain in reality. Remember: their range is based on the small light roadster, with only one adult passenger weighing 150lbs. Of course the weather has to be around 70f d' for maximum range. Any colder or warmer shortens range dramatically. This is the challenge for the Big 3.
I don't know where you would put it but someone needs to create some kind of charger that will extend the range of this car...though the trunk space is limited. 200-240 miles/charge is much better than previous electric vehicles but I thing we can do better with current technology. Maybe high capacity solar battery thin film technology built into the body? The extra cost could be worth it, as long as it (the added cost) could be reasonable.
you will have to explain that. naturally stupid, well yes, arn't we all? please teach me, what exactly about using DC to charge AC is against Nicola Nesla's ideas ? once you half educated yankies look at tv, your just expertts arn't you?
try reading some history, from books,with diverse sources, so what exactly is incorrect about my origonal statement?
i believe they use Lithium ion batteries, they should try to use Lithium Polymer, could actually make it cheaper because they would need less, i also think that they should make that motor bigger with the extra space that they would get :)
I was thinking, why can't Tesla just provide conversion solutions to those existing gasoline driven cars? Just cnange the engine, drv train and add up a battery will do.
spin it off? tesla is already in planning stages for a sedan. if i understand correct, and assuming no snags, they should have news on it in 2009, maybe 2010 release.
obviously now that the tech that will power any type of EV is finished, the hard parts done. Except of course working to continue improvements in milage per full charge.
though of course, 90% of america would be happy with a car that can go 200miles on a charge.
These cars are about 80% efficient. That means the petrol or coal used to recharge is put to better use when you use in an electric car. If you burn gasoline in a conventional engine only 20% of that energy is converted into motion VS 80% in the Tesla. Still you can get SOLAR PANELS for your house and recharge it with no polution at all. The options exist people. And a mile in the tesla is at 2 cents a mile, THATS 2 CENTS.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
so instead of pay out the nose for gas, you will just pay out the nose on your electricity bill. and so in essence you will not save money nor will you be saving the earth
totaly wrong actually. the cost to charge this thing is a little less then a penny a mile. compared to the countless dollars spent in crude oil that add to pollution. this puts a huge dent in the impact on earth.
well when i run my ac my bill goes up alot. and also, power plants pollute alot. sure i might not have researched but in reality makes sense. but all this could makes sense to me since i live in california and we have an energy crisis. i cant run my ac, i cant do laundry till after 7pm, i disconnect all my cellphone chargers all for the reason that i will be charged out the wazoo, k thnx
yeah dude i don't kno what you're talking about. to start, the energy crisis of california was in 2000-2001.. so i don't know where you get your news from, but yeah.. and if you do the math, you will discover that electric energy is much more efficient, cheaper, and pollutes less than using gasoline in an internal combustion engine.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you are an idiot, you spend as much per charge of the battery as for half a galon of gas. the charger spends about as much juice as your computer, dumbass
"the charger spends about as much juice as your computer, dumbass" lmao and how is that relevant to gas efficiency? Like i said the facts are that it costs less then a penny per mile in energy to run this vehicle when gasoline costs much more then that. also, when you run your AC it runs higher amps then the charger of this roadster, thats why it costs so much. again, please look things up before calling people names.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
That interviewer was retarded. He actually is. He only has 13 chromosomes. He's my great-great-grandfather. Our whole family hates him. He's retarded, stupid, and old.
He's an embarassment. Tesla should run him over, but then the beautiful car would have old people stink all over it.
Would be interesting to see Li-Poly batteries used instead. Li-Poly weighs about 1/4 that of Li-Ion, can be laid in a linear configuration, and produces about 30% more power. Only problem is it's 2x the price and has been rumored to explode on high impact. (Not sure if recent developments have fixed this)
Well, you can go pay Ford $50,000 for an almost-500hp Shelby GT500 with it's solid axle rear end, gas-gulping V8, cheap inside and out, down to the wanna-be muscle exhaust that sounds like a well-tuned Harley at best. So, while you're busy doing donuts, the rest of us will be ripping up the corners in cars that won't cause another war over oil.
Not the most professional interview. Interesting content about the car though. LOL. The guy in the blue shirt is funny... and i think a little drunk :) Where's my scotch??!?!
the ppl in this vid are retarded, this is the future tho, i just wish tesla would make the sedan already. this company is going to change the world, i will be applying there after university
That thing has fewer parts and a technology that's like 100+ years old (except for batteries). Why the hell does it cost 90k? It makes no fucking sense. If others will follow soon, in 3 years I expect the price drop to under 30k.
An exige with less power and torque already costs $57k. The battery alone costs $20k so that is already $80k. Add the fact this is a completely new company that needs to recover development costs with this car (this IS their first car). Also unlike gasoline cars there's no established large suppliers of EV parts so more expensive parts too. The car also is 90% different than the elise so they didn't cut costs by sharing parts. Full carbon fiber body. See why it costs $100k now?
Don't tell me that nonsense. Why do you even mention Exige? Exige is a gas car, Tesla is electric - extremely cheaper electric power components. Interior is ugly, so it's only carbon fiber body - 50K of carbon - that's fucking insane. 200% overpriced. No wonder only stupid hollywood buys it.
Didn't you read? Battery alone is 20k, add to 57k price exige: 80k already! Where did you get electric components are cheaper? There is no large supply chain for electric components so they are more EXPENSIVE. Why do you think GM just raised the price of the Volt by $5k? A weaker 200hp (roadster has 250hp) ac-150 gen2 EV motor system already costs $25k. The 2ZZ-GE SC in the Exige costs LESS THAN $10k. Which one is cheaper? Also Tesla has to pay back the money spend starting a whole new company!
lol the car is soooo tiny :D
huyryo 10 months ago
Converted Evora
midgetmayo 1 year ago
only problem with electrice vehicles is no stick shift... oh well the tesla roadster is badass
muffinmanx99 1 year ago
@muffinmanx99 The engine isn't doing much good when you've got the clutch down.
Xormithan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Big corporations spend millions to ensure that information does not spread to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Let the revolution begin!
offertorycardiacml 1 year ago
In the majority of these videos, the car gets the bulk of the credit, but it's the battery that's makes this breakthrough possible. Even now many variations of the Li-Ion battery are either being or are waiting to be tested. Since this car have been out, there have already been improvements made to Li-Ion batteries.
Afrocanuk 1 year ago
Must have a big bridge rectifier in it. I'd love to get my hands on one and take it apart. Looks like some kick butt technology. Hats of to the folks who got this together. I hope there isn't to many spade connectors as they change resistance when they get warm and when heated over time. All the money to troubleshoot this when they can't do what we have without charging mad money.
NotLuckyInLife 1 year ago
great car
bonds911 1 year ago
You never see engineers wearing suits and sitting in an office, they dress like a blue collar job and always working in a warehouse.
studying all that math and science all this years, and being bossed by MBA.
Gutsyndicate 2 years ago
why not 1 battery?
rcszigeti 2 years ago
cooling and cell failure
MrMadechina 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Electric cars are cool. But there is just one huge thing (and a few other smaller ones) i don't like about them. Their lack of sound! You take away that totally awesome sound that only an internal combustion engine can make, you're taking away the second greatest thing about high performance cars. As far as sound goes, no "drill on steroids" will ever replace the sound a Ferrari v12, or a bored out, stroked, huge cam, piece of American muscle. Electric cars just don't have the drama, or passio
salemcripple 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who cares what you like, and what you dislike
ForcedEurope 2 years ago
What? If that was the only BIG problem for an electric car I had already had one.
The BIG problem, rather, is that there isn't an electic supply net on countries and you're basically forced to recharge your car at home and nowhere else. But... the passio and the drama of a 1800's based engine is the last thing ever.
drillococco01 2 years ago
noise is waste. "drill on steriods" sure but nice lotus design sells this car and full torque at zero rpm.
MrMadechina 2 years ago
Noise is cool. It's a huge part of going to the races. without it, it's like watching a music video with the sound on mute.
salemcripple 2 years ago
noise does add to the excitment.
MrMadechina 2 years ago
its the dawn of a new age !
we just need to wait a few years until they get better baterys cuz those suck and have to get exchanged in like 1 year ... (half of the car price are the baterys) xD
so yeah I'll get one when they get under 40.000$ and the'll do atleast 150 miles per charge (200miles maybe)
my 2 cents
zizikelizike 2 years ago
One tip tesla, place the battery's lower, and in a number of different places to lower centre of gravity. They seem to be mounted pretty high.
chippievw 2 years ago
The simple fact remains that today's electric cars best serve as second family cars for limited distance driving.
While the battery technology needs dramatic improvements, it wouldn't hurt to throw solar panels on the roof.
Photovoltaics still need lots of work to "solar assist" e-cars. However, solar charging for 8 hours while you work may be the difference between driving home and getting towed.
tron3entertainment 2 years ago
Its hard to design solar panels that conform to the shape of the roof and also solar panels will make the car a lot more expensive...
afthefragile 2 years ago
This car as a 250km+ of range at normal driving, so why are you guys still afraid of the range limit? Is not like everyone drives 300km or more for their day job. You charge your car over night go to job, return and them plug in again and so you will never have to worry about getting stuck with power.
Argoon1981 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Everyone familiar with electric cars knows the Tesla technology is brainless and will be totally unreliable - witness one tester running out of juice at 55 miles - the car didn't run out of juice - that would be impossible after only 55 miles - the car has over 15,000 electrical connections to its 8700 obsolete 1st generation li ion flashlight batteries. The connections
just stopped conducting juice. The Tesla technology is amateur hour, automotive style.
theBike45 2 years ago
Apple's engineers should design the new battery.
the new iCar !!!!
walkiebrook 2 years ago 2
so it IS based on the elise....^_^
sango351 2 years ago
3.5 hrs to charge- thats actually pretty quick considering how far you can go. I mean seriously: Except for salesman, who drives 250 miles every day???? and even if you have to drive 100 miles to work (???)- then you work 7-9 hrs, right? So your car can charge.... I mean its probaply not the car you take your family for a cross-country trip in. I'd buy it- Just dont have the cash though :)
rockscientist01 3 years ago 10
The charging process will be decreased by a capacitor battery aka a super capacitor, that will allow it to be charged in about ten minutes or so!
We have the technology to do it we just have to keep the oil companies from buying it up like Texico did with the new battery for the EV1!
proverb311031 3 years ago 2
Well, we don't yet have the technology to do it. It's still in question if that technology will ever exist. Many are working very hard on it though and we can keep our fingers crossed. The support of EEStor by Lockheed Martin is some fairly solid ground for optimism. EEStor has released some more tests as well and a car using their super capacitor can be hoped to come from ZENN around fall this year.
0453567 2 years ago
I am glad that Telsa is offering a fast charger on the Model S line, they can charges in about 45 minutes, even without the updates that you are speaking of!
proverb311031 2 years ago 2
I am sure there is a point you critics are trying to make here... fact is this is the future and internal combustion engines are old technology. you can like electric cars or not but they are the future and I for one am looking forward to it!
kriscurtis 2 years ago
You're preaching to the choir mate. I was just clarifying the facts. I wouldn't want to make the current progress of electric cars to look too much better than it really is lol.
Also didjya hear didjya hear? Look up Hitachi's lithium ion battery. I'm excited ^_^
Still not convinced of EEStor but I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
0453567 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
till they dont make the batteries more usable this kind of cars are ONLY nice gadget nothing more. only idiot can wait 16 hours to charge car LOL. maybe this works for lazy americans who ride for milk to shop but for any normal car user 200 km/s on one charging is totally not enought
marcusdavidus 3 years ago
he said 3,5h to charge...
cr4pnet 3 years ago 4
3.5 Is still far too long, and although I find parts of marcus's statement crass or somewhat jejune, I have duly noted his opinion. He is correct about it not being a viable option for the average user. Diesel is still a better option by far.
Terr0rt0telc0 2 years ago
Still very new technology development. It's getting better in leaps and bounds. There is technology already functional that allows for a charge time of a few minutes, it's all a question of research, testing and of bringing the price down over time.
(reference: Lithium Titanate)
0453567 2 years ago
I would much rather prefer to see the myte engine go into production or a comparable engine. You can convert a simple gas engine say a chevy 350sb to run on pure hydrogen, and you can make a simple tank system with rods running into water and have hydrogen on demand. Hydrogen on demand much safer due to not storing the gas, and cheaper than buying it since you pump water. Look it up; much more cost effective, runs better, cheaper, and still get to toss around great engines.
Terr0rt0telc0 2 years ago
Hydrogen on demand could never really work in the way you're referring for that application. You need electricity to produce the hydrogen via electrolysis and you still probably couldn't produce it as fast as your car could burn through it. You would need hydrogen tanks and hydrogen isn't a very efficient fuel when compared to pure electrical power, although at least it's better than petrol. I will miss gas engines though. I'm a car nut so yah, I'd have to.
0453567 2 years ago
did they fix the transmission?
tipoomaster 3 years ago
yes, by eliminating the 2 speed, now its single speed
ragbam 3 years ago 2
This car looks the nutts nuts.
Top top top marks, im in awe.
fatphilb 3 years ago
Now cut the weight! We need newer batteries that hold more and weigh less. The main thing weighing down this car is the batteries and it already does 0-60 in four seconds. You can only imagine what its performance and range could be.
shbycbra427 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Tesla vehicle earns credit for innovation, but until they can create a sedan that gets the range of 200 miles plus, with four seats, four passengers, and a trunk full of items from the market. I think we should remain in reality. Remember: their range is based on the small light roadster, with only one adult passenger weighing 150lbs. Of course the weather has to be around 70f d' for maximum range. Any colder or warmer shortens range dramatically. This is the challenge for the Big 3.
dieselplow 3 years ago
I think you are an idiot. You must work for the big 3.
whiskers78753 3 years ago 3
the new sedan will be released in 2011-2012 and it has a range of 300 miles....
MastaMusical 2 years ago
I don't know where you would put it but someone needs to create some kind of charger that will extend the range of this car...though the trunk space is limited. 200-240 miles/charge is much better than previous electric vehicles but I thing we can do better with current technology. Maybe high capacity solar battery thin film technology built into the body? The extra cost could be worth it, as long as it (the added cost) could be reasonable.
questor333 3 years ago
I believe it does come with a small 110 volt charger you can carry with you. Just takes longer to charge at 110 volts.
mcrickman 3 years ago
melldeuss
Pedemanteiga 3 years ago
Tesla roadster, how ironic, using the DC grid to charge your
AC car. pretty much the opposite of his concept.
thomas Eddison is screwing him from the grave.
JUNKYARDOGvideos 3 years ago
Please learn atleast some basics about electricity and Nikola Tesla.
Obviously you dont realize what Tesla did for the world, and because of comments like yours i think that some people are just naturally stupid...
distrood 3 years ago 2
you will have to explain that. naturally stupid, well yes, arn't we all? please teach me, what exactly about using DC to charge AC is against Nicola Nesla's ideas ? once you half educated yankies look at tv, your just expertts arn't you?
try reading some history, from books,with diverse sources, so what exactly is incorrect about my origonal statement?
JUNKYARDOGvideos 3 years ago
The GRID is AC not DC.
I believe it is the other way TESLA the Electricity GENIUS' concepts are alive and well.
PORTUGAL1010 3 years ago
Some how it would be lack of respect and contradictory to the name they are presumably willing to honor.
quelorepario 2 years ago
lol
no Serbian scientist Nikola Tesla
no Tesla Roadster
pavledaljev 3 years ago
Everything there is will be: e e e e-lectric! Electro is the way of the future!
niswel 3 years ago 11
i believe they use Lithium ion batteries, they should try to use Lithium Polymer, could actually make it cheaper because they would need less, i also think that they should make that motor bigger with the extra space that they would get :)
Tr1llobite 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'd be miserable if my "life" started as an beautiful Elise and turned into this sack of shit.
bedlambikes 3 years ago
I WANT ONE!
gonzaloxxx 3 years ago 2
I was thinking, why can't Tesla just provide conversion solutions to those existing gasoline driven cars? Just cnange the engine, drv train and add up a battery will do.
IsaaxTeddy 3 years ago
lol, easier said than done. they have to make a custom kit for each model of the car. battery pack is very big and heavy too.
mluu510 3 years ago
does anyone know how long it takes to charge from empty to full?
tuankietfantazy 3 years ago
3.5 hours
bennycake06 3 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Wanted Tesla Car, new or used, also buy options and reservations.
HELP ME!!!
Thank you
massimova 3 years ago
What we need to spin it off - is 5 person family car.
Also you can imagine how much you will save on oil and orther accessories like oil/air filters etc. Not to mention the main thing - GAS.
Soodla 3 years ago 2
spin it off? tesla is already in planning stages for a sedan. if i understand correct, and assuming no snags, they should have news on it in 2009, maybe 2010 release.
obviously now that the tech that will power any type of EV is finished, the hard parts done. Except of course working to continue improvements in milage per full charge.
though of course, 90% of america would be happy with a car that can go 200miles on a charge.
waltermh111 3 years ago 3
My Ford charges me 29 cents per mile. That's 15 times more than the Tesla.
pabauza 3 years ago 2
These cars are about 80% efficient. That means the petrol or coal used to recharge is put to better use when you use in an electric car. If you burn gasoline in a conventional engine only 20% of that energy is converted into motion VS 80% in the Tesla. Still you can get SOLAR PANELS for your house and recharge it with no polution at all. The options exist people. And a mile in the tesla is at 2 cents a mile, THATS 2 CENTS.
pabauza 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so instead of pay out the nose for gas, you will just pay out the nose on your electricity bill. and so in essence you will not save money nor will you be saving the earth
emuthefoo 3 years ago
totaly wrong actually. the cost to charge this thing is a little less then a penny a mile. compared to the countless dollars spent in crude oil that add to pollution. this puts a huge dent in the impact on earth.
try researching a little before commenting, thnx.
FireFoxConn 3 years ago 4
well when i run my ac my bill goes up alot. and also, power plants pollute alot. sure i might not have researched but in reality makes sense. but all this could makes sense to me since i live in california and we have an energy crisis. i cant run my ac, i cant do laundry till after 7pm, i disconnect all my cellphone chargers all for the reason that i will be charged out the wazoo, k thnx
emuthefoo 3 years ago
yeah dude i don't kno what you're talking about. to start, the energy crisis of california was in 2000-2001.. so i don't know where you get your news from, but yeah.. and if you do the math, you will discover that electric energy is much more efficient, cheaper, and pollutes less than using gasoline in an internal combustion engine.
absolute141 3 years ago 2
Yes your right, the lighter weight plus reduced friction losses means less power waisted before you even plug in!
chrishibbert20 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are an idiot, you spend as much per charge of the battery as for half a galon of gas. the charger spends about as much juice as your computer, dumbass
maoristereo 3 years ago
"the charger spends about as much juice as your computer, dumbass" lmao and how is that relevant to gas efficiency? Like i said the facts are that it costs less then a penny per mile in energy to run this vehicle when gasoline costs much more then that. also, when you run your AC it runs higher amps then the charger of this roadster, thats why it costs so much. again, please look things up before calling people names.
FireFoxConn 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i was saying that in aproval of the car, not the gas ones. why dont you try reading things through before shooting your mouth, genious?
maoristereo 3 years ago
idiots this interview was fascinating
coolerdude44 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Damn if it had lotus/toyota engine it would be so sexy it should be the next mr2 haha
tribalforrealz 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That interviewer was retarded. He actually is. He only has 13 chromosomes. He's my great-great-grandfather. Our whole family hates him. He's retarded, stupid, and old.
He's an embarassment. Tesla should run him over, but then the beautiful car would have old people stink all over it.
MPaulHolmes 3 years ago
This guy talks so slow and is soooo boring
the car looks cool and its pretty good for a 100% electric but that guy jut wont let me finish viewing the video awake!!
Brasker 4 years ago
that car reminds me of the coast car from trackmania... :O
conj2610 4 years ago
It's a nice car, I'd like to see more like it.
Would be interesting to see Li-Poly batteries used instead. Li-Poly weighs about 1/4 that of Li-Ion, can be laid in a linear configuration, and produces about 30% more power. Only problem is it's 2x the price and has been rumored to explode on high impact. (Not sure if recent developments have fixed this)
edisme518123 4 years ago 2
(sigh) What can I say .If this is the future,
the future depresses me. This better not replace modern muscle or i'll be ticked >:(
I like it, Its a nice car. But it has its place. so let it stay in that place.
dude486 4 years ago
Well, you can go pay Ford $50,000 for an almost-500hp Shelby GT500 with it's solid axle rear end, gas-gulping V8, cheap inside and out, down to the wanna-be muscle exhaust that sounds like a well-tuned Harley at best. So, while you're busy doing donuts, the rest of us will be ripping up the corners in cars that won't cause another war over oil.
edisme518123 4 years ago 3
Its not my fault there a damn war over oil!
the other countries are just too damn selfish
and greedy! And I never said that it should
run gas!
dude486 4 years ago
You can put electric power in any sort of car. When this technology takes off you'll start seeing American Muscle cars with electric power.
0453567 2 years ago 2
Yeah cause I want that to happen -.- Its not that I don't like all this talk of electric cars taking the place of gas powered.
Ok I don't but according everybody on this subject its a necessity. and I'm just not convinced of that yet.
dude486 2 years ago
FYI I don't care too much the GT500. Why you act like V8 muscle cars are going to destroy the world? You act like anyone
who wants or owns one is an idiot. I got
all from your response anyway.
dude486 2 years ago
omg i live a mile away from the place they were charging it, alices restaurant
callmm 4 years ago
Not the most professional interview. Interesting content about the car though. LOL. The guy in the blue shirt is funny... and i think a little drunk :) Where's my scotch??!?!
musclecarkid 4 years ago
they are never professional
callmm 4 years ago
professional news don't care about EVs. They are only complaining about high gas prices, and give useless "hints" to raise your milage.
They might present Hydrogen, but refuse to look at the EVs.
By the way, stop whining it is not a perfect interview but not that bad. I have seen much worse. Imho it is ok
CAESARbonds 3 years ago 2
shitbox
mrdvs694 4 years ago
the ppl in this vid are retarded, this is the future tho, i just wish tesla would make the sedan already. this company is going to change the world, i will be applying there after university
lastchild01 4 years ago
U R A FUKEN DORK! Get a babe that knows what she is talking about, not you!
fuckyoumyman 4 years ago
does it comes with a FLex capacitor? cool lights on the car where you put the juice in.
ShinWR1 4 years ago
wtf, why did they waste time with the first 30 seconds of that vid!
Its an awesome car though, hopefully it will be the future
Zdaytona05 4 years ago
It is the future
Nichen 4 years ago
It has to be.
samatronexcel 4 years ago
That thing has fewer parts and a technology that's like 100+ years old (except for batteries). Why the hell does it cost 90k? It makes no fucking sense. If others will follow soon, in 3 years I expect the price drop to under 30k.
f00kumofo123 4 years ago
Batteries(Li-ion) are very expensive.
ekuwa69 4 years ago
An exige with less power and torque already costs $57k. The battery alone costs $20k so that is already $80k. Add the fact this is a completely new company that needs to recover development costs with this car (this IS their first car). Also unlike gasoline cars there's no established large suppliers of EV parts so more expensive parts too. The car also is 90% different than the elise so they didn't cut costs by sharing parts. Full carbon fiber body. See why it costs $100k now?
stopcrazypp 4 years ago 3
Don't tell me that nonsense. Why do you even mention Exige? Exige is a gas car, Tesla is electric - extremely cheaper electric power components. Interior is ugly, so it's only carbon fiber body - 50K of carbon - that's fucking insane. 200% overpriced. No wonder only stupid hollywood buys it.
f00kumofo123 4 years ago
Didn't you read? Battery alone is 20k, add to 57k price exige: 80k already! Where did you get electric components are cheaper? There is no large supply chain for electric components so they are more EXPENSIVE. Why do you think GM just raised the price of the Volt by $5k? A weaker 200hp (roadster has 250hp) ac-150 gen2 EV motor system already costs $25k. The 2ZZ-GE SC in the Exige costs LESS THAN $10k. Which one is cheaper? Also Tesla has to pay back the money spend starting a whole new company!
stopcrazypp 4 years ago 4
That think so quiet!!~
Hao420 4 years ago
the way that the guy presents the tesla just has noo enthusiasm whatsoever. He makes an amazing electric car sound soooo boring
A great guy to help tell your children bedtime stories and make them pass out
mchamp3802 4 years ago 5
At least he isnt as boring as that black guy from autonetwork that talks 100% in monotone and acts like he hates his job.
hyp3rdrv 4 years ago
You leave the enthusiasm and opinion at the audience. He has to present facts professionally being one of the engineer of the car.
inhuman216 4 years ago 2
He's an engineer not a PR person. Engineers tend to be boring, but they get the job done and that's the important part.
stopcrazypp 4 years ago 4