Added: 2 years ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 44,500
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,375)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is tyt pronounced tit?

  • @DannyFischarge

    I always "thought" it as tee-why-tee.

  • cenk was a republican only 5 years ago, huh...

  • Jesse Ventura & Ron Paul 2012.

  • 38 people need to be bodyslammed!

  • Jesse Ventura would be awesome in the justice department or as the CIA head chief, Ron Paul 2012 could make it happen!

  • I really like Jesse Ventura.. I can't see any possibility of him ever becoming president though.. he's way too straight up.. but it would be a good thing, and throw the plans of all the world power brokers in the toilet..

    They'l never let him though..

  • Ron Paul / Jesse Venture ticket for 2012

  • i agree with a lot of what Ventura says but he lost me when he started talking about Loose Change

  • Ron Paul and Jesse Ventura for 2012.Then the people could get the America back we had before all the crooks took it over....

  • @darkwitch5252

    I posted the same thing and saw yours right after. Good to see someone else agrees!

  • its so obvious that we went into iraq because of the huge oil reserves when you look at it.

  • lol 21:50 "No way in 'H'"

  • nobody in the media wants to know the truth about 9-11 becoz of what it entails: end of a system & revolution.. but not acknowledging what's in front of our faces will just postpone what's bound to happen atsome point anyway

  • @truthmouthpiece2 it's just like how cbs, fox, nbc and abc/espn/disney never investigate the nfl nba mlb etc. for their scams. you never hear bob costas report negative things about those players til the police bust the players illegal activity.

  • @999ll0Olll0ll666 how is his show ridiculous? did you even watch his show? did you do your research on the FEMA camps, haarp, martial law??? you havent done any research 9/11 was an inside job you are a fool to believe your government look up some 9/11 videos, there is this one where one of the  planes wing disappears before it even hits the building can you explain that? can you explain how no markings or windows were seen on the planes? you cant can you

  • Jim Janos didn't get approved for another season of his RIDICULOUS conspiranoia-show, did he? Whatta complete dummass.

  • I am not sure Jesse Ventura would be a great President. But I am positive he'd be a good, a very good one.

  • @matteoprez Part of the problem is he's trying to come off as funny and popular rather than focusing on the core issues to find out truth. He's like a big kid, likeable but a little lost. It's a good show though

  • Jesse Ventura for President 2012

  • Just use your brain!

  • Thank God we have people like Jesse Ventura: The voice of reason!!!!!! Also thank God For TYT!!!!!!!!

  • I'm a Democrat, but I could back Ventura IF he didn't have such a nutso hard-on for conspiracy theories. Plus we all know that the US goverment is really run by the SA, the Sasquatch Alliance. Those goddamn skunk apes control everything from deep within their secret bunker below Mt. St. Helens. Just because I made it up doesn't mean it's not true.

    And FTR he was never a SEAL, he was UDT.

  • @jschultzVII He was in UDT team 12 and during Vietnam he was attached to Seal Team 2. UDTs and SEALS both go through BUDS together it was only pure chance that he was assigned to a UDT team instead of SEAL team. Anyone that goes through BUDS can call themselves a seal. All UDTS are seals just like WW2 Frogmen are SEALS. Ask anyone whose been a SEAL they'll tell you that.

  • @SheerHeartAttack74

    Have you noticed how set up the Party Spectrum is???

    They are the EXACT opposite.

    Their is NO WAY that all Americans in the country could be torn exactly the ways the parties defined them.

  • Jesse ventura is INSANE!!! I literally did a face palm when he suggested that UPS delivery guys might be a part of his paranoid conspiracy theory fear-mongering BULLSHIT!!! ... or accusing his fellow navy seals of doing it! ...this fucker was dropped on his head too many times. Some REAL Navy Seal should beat the snot out of him...

  • @999II0OlllO0II666 An agent could dress up as a delivery guy. There are many unanswered questions. Why did workers in the towers hear explosions coming from BELOW? Why has the footage of the Pentagon crash not been released? How did Ted Olson's wife manage to 'phone on flight 77 (impossible at such altitude)? Why did the gov. threaten witnesses at the Pentagon? Why does the leaseholder of tower 7 say the gov. told him it would be demolished? Why was Secretary Mineta's testimony deleted?

  • @SkullOfYorick Your answers:

    1 Not explosions, those were floors collapsing.

    2 All the footage HAS been released.

    3 The cell phone calls were made at a much lower altitude, right before impact.

    4 Nobody was "threatened" at the Pentagon. The investigation was ongoing.

    5 Sounds like disinfo there. Who was the "leaseholder" & where did you hear that?

    6 Mineta's testimony was never "deleted" from anything.

    Where do you ppl come from? What's your personal agenda?

  • @999II0OlllO0II666 floors collapsing? the towers were made of steel, they don't just collapse. if there was no explosion, the top of the tower would just fall off and even that wouldn't be likely to happen within minutes. the towers came straight down and turned to dust not pieces.

  • @AlwayzBallin24 Try consulting something other than conspiracy CRAP websites and videos on the internet (where NOTHING EVER gets peer-reviewed) and you might realize just how FOOLISH the so-called "9/11 truthers" appear to REAL scientists and educated people. There are literally HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of architects and engineers in the USA and only 1500 have joined the conspiratard movement?

    WAAAAAAA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH­AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!

    DAMN....

  • @999II0OlllO0II666 go shine obama's shoes. give bush a blowjob while at it. anyone with common sense can see who was really behind it. it def wasnt a bunch of bums that hide out in caves.

  • @999II0OlllO0II666 he was talking about possible scenarios you fucking retard, do you listen to only what you wanna hear? or to the whole interview...

  • @mihaimoldo I only listen to what I wanna hear... & I don't wanna hear antthing from "Jesse" the FAKE WRESTLER/LIAR/DISINFO-NUTJOB.

  • Ever think there might be other groups, other than terrorists or governments responsible for Sep. 11?

  • Yeah! Kick Cenk's pompous ass Jesse!

  • @BoycottIsraelAlways Faggot really? Grow up. You couldn't beat his ass he is fucking insane.

  • @BoycottIsraelAlways I will kick your ass!

  • @SheerHeartAttack74 why would you assume that?? I am a Christian and a conservative and i like jesse ventura

  • @BoycottIsraelAlways YOU SOUND LIKE A FAGGOT by the way he'll rock your world, pussy

  • @BoycottIsraelAlways YOU SOUND LIKE A FAGGOT

  • I would vote him in, but he will be killed i guarantee.

  • @BoycottIsraelAlways Wow you are completely un-American. What are you 10? He's smart and anyone that does not like his question is a moron.

  • guys, im very certain that "BoycottIsraelAlways" is just another dumbass, jackass, punk ass kid that acts tough behind a screen we have all seen it before and will sadly continue to see it, so, i wish BoycottIsraelAlways a happy fuck off from all of us jesse ventura fans and supporters and friends.

  • Salt Water Fuel using radio Frequency this is incredible don't let the gov mess it up...it also may cure cancer...

  • Obama is SUCH a disappointing first black president....

  • I don't buy in to any of his conspiracy bullshit. But I like the guy anyway. Who doesn't?

  • @mik99D Same here.

  • Jesse Ventura: 45th President of the United States of America!

  • Is their a connection between all thing Jesse Ventura says ?

  • Ventura is right on 9/11. It's almost indisputable at this point that the Twin Towers and WTC7 were taken down via Controlled Demolition and that a Missle actually hit the Pentagon.

  • 911 = mossad operation

  • When I heard that Iraq was going to be invaded...I have to admit, I got kinda mad and confused. "What does Iraq have to do with this? I thought Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, not Iraq." I was almost thirteen at the time.

  • IThis video shows how Ventura is being 'stonewalled'. Its obvious - - - -

  • @MrDustock I don't understand a word you are saying. Honestly... And sorry. I will not comment on anything else you say. Talking with people who do not wnat to see facts is like arguing with a brick wall. I enjoy this programm here because it is based on facts! And not BS like fox for example. I am not saying its the only right thing in the world. I am not saying you are wrong. I just don't care. I watched both liberal and conservative biased shows... and my conclusion has always been the same.

  • @MrDustock  I am ending this here. No interest in discussing with someone who lies. (And you will come back at me non the less... if it makes you happy, go ahead. I know I am a liberal european scumbag who loves the left and their evil habit of trying to make ALL the people happy... how dare they!)

  • @MrDustock no show in the world has ugly ankers... because the ratings would suck. And WHO cares by the way if they lighten up the programm with nonsense. It's not like your forced to watch it. And you are totally making things up because you have no facts to present. TYT does mostly hollywood reports? yeah... whatever. 90% is political but... hey. If you want to ignor reality, who am I to stop you?

  • @MrDustock actually read the definition of themselves...

    "Are You Subscribed to The Largest Online News Show in the World? " and read on if you want... where does it say that? I can't find it. And they are far from being the largest in the world... grow up. BBC, CNN, and lots of other channels also have online shows... you made that up. And as for the dumbing down part... yeah... fox news dumbs people down. True.

  • @MrDustock that is why they don't refer to themselves as news. Unlike fox - and that program has tons of sports, holllywood and minor stupid things and CALLS itself fox-news... TYT is nothing more than a political, cultural and sometimes funny comment-talk-interview show. They never claimed otherwise.

  • Jesse has come to his conclusion and so have I. 9-11 was an inside job.

  • I like Venture, but I really disagree with the idea of of 9/11 being an inside job.

  • TYT is afraid to ask the question and act as if something isnt right about 911 because everybody that does that is seen as crazy.

    I have questions that i would like someone to answer.

  • I like the young turk guy but he should have done his homework on basic policies and laws of the govt inorder to grasp the seriousness of the conspiracy theories. Oh, and we as Americans should really go back to basics and look up physics and the laws of that nature. You dont have to be a professional engineer or an expert to know that it was impossible to down the towers with a plane crash... wow, we really looked stupid for 10years.

  • Cenk was out of his league here. But I would be too if I were interviewing him.

  • Jesse Ventura = The Truth

  • Jesse Ventura = The Truth.

  • This county's only hope 4 salvation is 2 elect someone like Jesse Ventura or Ron Paul. If you won't support and vote 4 them because you are a democrat or a republican, then you are a mindless fool. Both parties are corrupt and here is the proof. Explain to me how you can put two highly intelligent people and put them in a room and have them completely disagree on every single issue posed to them. YOU CANT! Questioning your government doesn't make you unpatriotic.... just the opposite.

  • @Domin8r78 u should only elect someone to become your president if you believe they are the best person to do the job.the party system in the american constitutional system should be only used for the congress and senate.if the president is used as a casting vote he or she can only do that thru total impartiality.i agree totally with your 2 people in a room statement. in my opinion the founding fathers wrote what they did because of the system they had left in europe. contd

  • @Domin8r78 contd.they were in many ways in the same mind set that the allies were in 1945 in germany and japan where they set up syatems that were starting from scratch and that ecompassed all the ideals and lessons they had learned from there own mistakes.America needs an independant free thinking leader to bring about the change that has to come as otherwise the world will end as we know it.Ron paul,Jesse ventura,and perhaps Denis kucinich as a team should be an option 4 change.

  • Comment removed

  • Democrats - Articulate, but spineless.

    Republicans - Passionate, but clueless.

    Lobbyists - Greedy and opportunistic.

    America - In trouble. 

  • @lukegreen37 Jessie Ventura - Patriot.

  • @lukegreen37 you - stupid and hopless

  • @lukegreen37 And Independents are.......?

  • @lukegreen37 i used to agree but the last couple months it made it clear to me that the dems and reps jus play there roles the reps push for insane policy and the dems always back off and give in and this is the show they put on and they hit the repeat button and they stay at the top and everyone else is stagnant actually stagnant would be a better option for most americans, most r plumiting into poverty. it will never change and so few ppl can see it. there all indoctrinated by there familes

  • @lukegreen37 I agree that if the Democrats would get a spine, I would have no trouble voting for them.

  • Jesse Ventura is a badass.

  • PAUL / VENTURA 2012

  • I gotta give the Young Turks guy props... His questions may have seemed stupid or like he was uninformed, but he sure got the Governor to bring up some awesome points and facts!

  • lol i never new that about you cenk. i was a republican when bush started too and now i am pretty fucking progressive as well. keep up the good work both of you.

  • Cenk hasn't watched Loose Change but he's watched the debunking stuff? How can he form a balanced, skeptical view without examining both sides? Typical weak-minded person. *sigh*

  • @kensei85 yea cenk, this is such a huge fucking topic man. you gotta cover this more. all this talk about both wars really change when u look at it from the inside job perspective. loose change is a good starting point. but there are real architects and engineers and pilots and firemen now that make convincing cases about this.

    ae911truth(dot)org

    patriotsquestion911(dot)com

    question 911 MSNBC

    start with building seven. no plane hit it and it came down at free fall speed.

  • I think if people research Operation Northwoods, which was followed by the Kennedy assassination then the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the pieces of the puzzle will look clearer and make 9-11 look clearer too.

  • Lol there was a wrestler named Bill Graham? His signature move was probably the Bible-Driver.

  • Cenk is really looking stupid on this interwiew. He's asking questions about 9/11 that he knows so little about. The people that reject the possibility of an inside job are people who don't even know about WTC7. Just like what alexhartan said, watch the documentary, there are so many different ones on the net that have the same questions & answers for the past 9 years. Perhaps Cenk feels ignorance is bliss.

  • I really hope Cenk checks out Loose Change....

  • Just watch the damn documentary, Cenk.

    It is FULL of information that answer your questions.

  • well im gonna check when this is done. but you need to take his advice and watch loose change. you may have watched it i dont know. but i will check =)

  • That is a great point Jesse made about not indicting Bind Laden for 9/11, I never realized that.

  • Cenk is AFRAID to lose credibility... no doubt about that...

    Cenk's fear of losing credibility will be the end of him...

  • Look up Operation Bojinka. That's the real precursor to 9/11. It was a terrorist plot to blow up commerical airliners by Osama Bin Laden in 1995. Those attacks were never carried out, but are obviously precursors to 9/11. The CIA knew for some time that Osama was determined to attack us, it wasn't exactly a secret. That it happened on the watch of one of the most incompetent presidents in history shouldn't be surprising to you.

  • 9/11 was an OUTSIDE JOB. All the facts support this conclusion. Anyone who says differently has an agenda and a willingness to ignore science and bend the truth.

  • @Maytag99 our government lied about Tonkin resulting in the Vietnam war. planned to attack us as an excuse to invade cuba in operation north woods 1962. they have admittedly put crack in inner cities,they lied about wmds to get us into a war in iraq,the cia has openly sold drugs put dictators in power assassinated citizens etc, they lie and lie. and you say i'm irrational for distrusting the government? what wrong with you? i wasn't a truther till 2008. so its not emotional. i got empirical.

  • @robaquarian Yes, Tonkin was used as an excuse to go to war, but it's not quite as simple as "our government lied." There was definitely an attack on the USS Maddox on the first night by North Vietnamese, but it's not clear who fired first. On the second night, they seemed to be firing blindly at targets. Was this event used as a flimsy excuse to go to war? Yes, but it's not as if it was completely fabricated.

    This is not a very compelling reason to believe the govt is capable of 9/11.

  • @robaquarian So you "got empirical," hm? No, my friend. In my opinion, what happened is that you got caught up in a web of misinformation. As I have tried to show, almost all of your "evidence" that you have brought up here is questionable. Your view on 9/11 is one sided. You have your own official story: "9/11 is an inside job," and you dismiss anything that doesn't coincide with your story.

    Why do you do this? It seems like it must be emotional reasons to me.

  • he says its OK to ask questions but hes never watched loose change, he doesn't want to ask questions. he's lazy or sacred. I'm very disappointed in this guy. very intellectually dishonest.

  • @robaquarian Oh, I forgot about Loose Change. Loose Change is a fantasy video.  The "evidence" in it has all been thuroughly debunked. I want you to go to Google and type in "Loose Change Guide." Now re-watch loose change using this handy guide which will actually correct all those little factual errors. Isn't that nice?

    I know, it sucks when facts get in the way of exciting conspiracy theories. It makes them less exciting, doesn't it?

  • @Maytag99 loose change lied about war games? about the commission being underfunded stone walled and omitting testimony? it lied about isi leader giving mohamand atta 100 000? it lied about molten steel at ground zero? it lied about hani honjour being bad pilot and flying an incredible maneuver into the pentagon? it lied about put options on united airline days before 911? it li;ed about marvin bush running security for WTC and dulles airport? hmm tell me how those are all debunked.

  • @robaquarian It lied about the molten steel. Some contractors said they saw "molten steel" at the site, but it was never tested. It may very well have been aluminum.

    It lied about Hani Honjour. There's no evidence he was a bad pilot. He had a commercial instrument-rated pilot.

    It exaggerated about the options on United Airlines. Those options were investigated, and found to be tied to a newsletter as part of a trade strategy, which included BUYING the options on Sept 10th.

  • @Maytag99 wrong again even the 911 commission report admits hani was not very good pilot. he took a few lessons in a prop plane and was terrible, so you are now lying. many people say molten steel and there are NASA pictures of molten steel. where do you get this crap? now it sounds like you are just making shit up.the put options were very unusual and duetsche bank will not tell who made them you are lying again. cant be molten steel in oxygen starved debris pile unless explosives used.

  • @robaquarian In this case the 911 commission report is misleading. Hani was described by some as a terrible pilot, but this was primarily because of his lack of English skills. His instructor described his piloting skills as "a very average pilot, maybe struggling a little bit." Furthermore, experienced pilots agree that the type of manuevers they were doing were not very finessed, and well within thier skill range.

  • @robaquarian No, there aren't many sources that saw molten steel. Here are the sources I can identify: Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition Inc. His contractor told him "molten steel," however this was not tested in any way. I'm not sure about what NASA pictures you're talking about. NASA measured the temperatures of hot spots at the site, but it was days afterwords and only surface temperatures. And there were also underground fires at the site for some time.

  • @Maytag99 they gonna put CIA SEC FBI offices, emergency bunker for the mayor in building 7, when it could collapse from a few fires with sulfur in the steel?lol. why even rig a building with explosives to bring them down why not just set them on fire if they come down that easy?in order to make a building come down like that you have to blow internal collums 1st. many at the same time in an order that impossible from fire. how could fire temperatures be so high to have molten metal weeks later?

  • @robaquarian It wasn't just fire alone. It was fire plus structural damage.

    You're still saying the buildings fell at free fall? Again, how did the debris fall faster than the buildings? This should be impossible in a controlled demolition. Please, explain to me how the debris fell faster than the buildings!

  • @Maytag99 no they now admit it wasnt the structural damage but teh fore taht weakend the steel again you dont know shit. debris could of fell faster cause they were blown out. and i dont see evidence of that. many people testified that bombs went off in the basement before a plane even hit. at they took that out of the commission report. your arguments are retarded. guilinani was warned before the 1st tower fell to get out of there. never in history that happened but some how they knew.

  • he is very lazy if he has heard all this about loose change but he hasn't taken an hour of his life of watch it?? what doesn't he just watch it? he thinks he is being reasonable to say i don't know? he just want to be ignorant? he is afraid of the truth or what might be true? he doesn't want to be branded a conspiracy theorist. you don't have to be an expert in anything to connect the dots to see that 911 is a myth. watch the movie!!

  • @robaquarian Why don't YOU stop believing the "official story" of the conspiracy theorists, and start doing a little research on THEM. The so called "leaders" of the 9/11 truth movement are some strange people, dude, who believe in all sorts of ridiculous things and whom even change thier stories whenever it is convenient.

    Go to google and type 911guide/truthersexposed

    If you dare to actually know more about the TRUTH of the "911 truth" movement, do it. Are you scared of the real truth?

  • @Maytag99 strange people? david ray griffin steven jones? x cia people? engineers? your ad homonym wont work on me. i've done 2 years of research. you haven't. and we dont have leaders in this movement we are all leaders

  • @Maytag99 popular mechanics did you read their book and article debunking 911 theories? its a total joke. they were not experts at all. they fired their whole team hired new people. and said things like the airforce isn't prepared for hijackings and scramblings, teh head of research was the cousin of DHS. dotn think their a conflict of interest? head of 911 commission was zelicow author of preemptive war. NIST a bush agency dept of trans. its obvious

  • @robaquarian I admit that it is sort of an ad-hominem for me to attack the people in the 911 truth movement as nutty, but now you're using the same type of argument against popular mechanics, aren't you? Let's both concede we were wrong. Debate the facts, not the people.

    In my defense, I thought you might be a little unfamiliar with some of the people in your movement, and might want to learn more. But I admit this does not argue against their points. FACTS do that, very handily.

  • @Maytag99 no popular mechanics should not be trusted that's not ad homynym they have a conflict of interest. they use terms like conspiracy theory too make people dismiss all their arguments a prirori. why did it take over 2 years for their to be an investigation? the families had to beg. they weren't even gonna do one. Blair and Powell both said they were gonna prove bin laden did it but never did, the admission videos are very suspect. found at convenient times. look up operation north woods

  • @robaquarian I think your beliefs are at thier core, emotional. You have a deep distrust of the govt, and the 9/11 conspiracy just makes emotional sense to you. You are trying to reconcile objective facts with what you emotionally believe what must be true.

    This is how I explain why you seem to ignore facts which disprove your case, and insist on organizing the facts in a certain specific illogical way which supports your worldview. It doesn't make sense, man. Think about it.

  • @Maytag99 i think your beliefs are emotional. you like to call conspiracy theorists crazy. why wouldn't i deeply distrust for the government. i don't buy our government is full of well intentioned people and we are a true democracy and exceptional. this is a a corporate fascist empire. this government has always lied to the people. it doesnt care abotu human life only power and resources, killing 3000 t get a pretext to war is typical of them. if you dont realize that your blind,911=inside job!

  • @robaquarian You are absolutely 100% right to distrust the govt, dude. I'm with you on that. I don't buy that it is full of well intentioned people either. Corporate fascist empire... I wouldn't go that far, but perhaps there's elements of that. Has the govt always lied to the people? Definetly.

    But... were the 9/11 attacks really in the govt's self interests? What about the damage to the economy it caused? Surely there would be a less damaging way to create an excuse for war?

  • black ops, CIA,high levels of FBI. they wont tell cause they are can be killed.

  • You know, Jesse seems like such a smart guy, but he is so WRONG about the conspiracy stuff. Yes, Oswald acted alone. It's been PROVEN. 9/11 was an OUTSIDE job. It's been PROVEN.

    The reason you lose your credibility if you ask questions about these subjects is because you are spreading misinformation. There is no need for questions, we already know the answers.

  • @Maytag99 oswald never had a trial, was alone has been proven? by who? out side job proven? they still have no proof bin laden did it. wheres the video of the plane hitting the pentagon why wont they release the 65 vids? how did building 7 fall? they never mentioned it in the report. how did cell phones work at 30000 ft? so called experts say its proven its been proven?have you read the 911 commission report? its a joke! ya just accept what the media tells us dont questions anything! right?

  • @robaquarian Yes, it has been proven that it was Oswald. Here's what I mean: a careful examination of all the facts reveals that everything is consistant with a lone gunman. The way Kennedy's head moves when he is shot proves the shot must have come from the book depository.

    It's Oswald in 3, babe. Proven.

    In the case of 9/11: There's a ton of witnesses who saw the planes. Building 7 fell because the steel had a high content of sulphur, which happens when steel is misforged.

  • @Maytag99 no one says their wasn't any planes you are making a straw man.building 7 fell at free fall speed. from a a few fires, never in history has a building collapsed due to fire never. not much damage to 7 even if it did fall it would of toppled over. the 911 commission didn't even investigate building 7, also 7 could not fall at near free fall speed with out resistance that perfectly impossible. you also don't know what the jfk theory is

  • @robaquarian Well, it's not really a strawman because I'm not using it to discredit you, just stating some facts. There's a lot of people in the 9/11 movement, who all say various things, and I'm sure at one point there were people who said that there were no planes. If that's not your viewpoint, I apologize... (but careful not to overuse the term "strawman")

    It didn't fall at freefall speed. Or else, explain how dust and debris fell faster than the building?

  • @Maytag99 virtual free fall speed. watch the vidoe under 14 seconds. how could concrete turn into nothing, they found heavy beams ejected over 500ft. why did the engineers that help build WTC say the building could stand after multiple hits?there are no controversy in 911 truth that are not trivial there is a major consensus on most points. so your wrong about that too. according to laws of momentum the building should of toppled over or taken at least over a minute to collapse.

  • @Maytag99 no one denies someone shot from book depository. but there was 3 gun men. oswald was killed so there wouldn't be a trial. there was thermate in building 7 that is why there was sulfur. an explosive. why were the jest on drills about wtc and pentagon? why no one hit a hijack code? why flight 77 not shot down by anti aircraft missile at pentagon the most protected building in the world? you getting this crap from a debunking video with out doing your own thinking?

  • @robaquarian The evidence of thermate is very weak. A lot of chemicals were found, which is to be expected, but no Barium Nitrate, which is a very significant part of a thermate mix. Explain that?

    

  • @Maytag99 if you really think you are being fair and intellectually honest and not a priori check out david ray griffin Lets get empirical" its on youtube. watch that with an open mind them come back to me and debunk him. try it email me at waterbearer415 its on yahoo. cant wait

  • @robaquarian Not gonna watch it, but I don't need to debunk him if his only point is not to use a-priori reasoning. I agree with him on that point.

    But I'm not doing that. The facts support my conclusions, not yours. I don't accuse you of doing that either. Rather, I think you are simply ignoring all evidence that contradicts your views, and taking a shotgun approach of pointing to any fact which seems mysterious to you. You haven't taken the time to learn all the science behind the facts.

  • @Maytag99 not gonna watch him huh what you afraid of? you evidence is selected and fabricated. you by into authority not logic. you work from your conclusion and then go back wards. proves your attitude right there if you wont even watch the counter argument. your a conformist and an ideologue with no critical thinking skills. you are a waste of time arguing with. you are also a liar. ad hoc arguments making up evidence thats not even stated by the debunkers.not wasting my time any more on this

  • @robaquarian Wasn't gonna watch your A Priori guy because you never convinced me it was relevant. If you watch the video I suggested, I'll take a look at it. None of my arguments here have been from authority. Conformist? No... like I said, all I care about is the truth. Ad hoc arguments? How so? You say I like to call conspiracy theorists crazy? As far as I know I don't think I've said anything like that.

  • @robaquarian The damage from the main buildings caused structural damage and fires to building 7, this combined with the high sulphur content in the steel is what led to it's fall. Cell phones do work at 30,000 feet, it's just that the FCC generally doesn't allow them to be used that high.

    As for your other stuff, it's nonsense. REAL engineers who have actually studied what happened concluded that the official story is true.

  • @Maytag99 cell phones od not work at 30000 ft. and the 911 commsion never even tested to see if they could. only can work with towers in the planes which they didn't have them. its been tested you cant even use cell phones over 3000 ft in a cessna.plus they lied and changed story about flite 77 seat phones when there weren't any then they said babraba olson didnt even make any call to her husband when her husband said she did.

  • @robaquarian Phones do work at high altitudes, although the difficulty in getting a signal increases the higher they get. There are a lot of anecdotal reports of phones working from high altitudes.

    The 8,000 feet limit you're thinking of probably comes from AK Dewdney, who's research is questionable.

    Analog phones typically can work at much higher altitudes than digital. Also, Flight 93 had airfones, which do most certainly work at those altitudes.

  • @Maytag99 no your wrong they claimed many of the calls came from cell phones as well. flight 93 was shot down not an act of heroism. there was virtually zero wreckage at the site, and they found an engine like miles away. you can fake peoples voices on cell phones with a technology called voice morphing the things these people told their families were very bizarre. the planes were also on remote control from global hawk technology

  • @robaquarian "they claimed many of the calls came from cell phones as well." Who claimed that? The media? They would use "cell phones" or "mobiles" as a short-hand for airfones, since the public is less familiar with them. Also, a few of the calls came in as the plane was minutes before crashing, and was very low in altitude.

    There was indeed wreckage at the site, you can find various pictures of it online.

  • @robaquarian In addition, a flight attendant T Carter was at the wreckage site and identified it as the plane she normally flies on. She spoke at the COPA 2002 meeting, you can find audio of her for yourself online and listen to her story. So there was wreckage, indeed.

    I've read the transcripts of the people in Flight 93, they don't seem bizarre, they seem like what you would expect from people under duress.

  • @Maytag99 the official story is a conspiracy theory. conspiracy means 2 or more. never been proven. popular mechanics are a joke, the head of it was the cousin of homeland security head. there are thousands of engineers pilots that have proven 911 could not of been an out side job. so tell us how its been proven.

  • @robaquarian Yes, I realize that the gov't lies to it's people all the time, but it would never dare to attempt a cover up of this magnitude because there's simply no way to cover it up. It's impossible. Not to mention it's ridiculous to think the Bush administration would be competant enough to do it. Now that's a REAL myth!!

  • @Maytag99 yes they could cover it up. cause no one noticed anything people just accept what they are told. there are thousands of holes. hundreds of thousands of people knew and worked on about the Manhattan project in the 40s and they kept that a secret for years. bush didnt do it it was the military industrial complex CIA cheney a hole net work Bush is just a puppet. oh but bush could get million to support a war in iraq based in transparent lies? but not a phony terrorist attack?

  • @robaquarian No they could NOT cover something like that up. The reason "no one notices" is because there is nothing to notice. A real conspiracy of that magnitude would have SERIOUS LEAKS... especially from all the groundwork it would take. For example... the calls from Flight 93, who faked them? Did Cheney do it? Just one of the many people they would have to hire.

    It's a bit different from Bush getting support for a war. It's easy to manipulate the public with propaganda.

  • @Maytag99 its called compartmentalization. people involved only know their part and not the final result. Hitler talks about the big lie.the 911 commission admits that ISI head gave $100 000 to Mohammad a few days before 911 but they didnt see it as important!!! and that same ISI guy was in DC with joe biden on 911!! not strange to you? cant wait for your bullshit answer on that one.and why are oswalds files still classified if he was just a lone nut? how does it affect national security?

  • @robaquarian Compartmentalization, huh? You're saying there were people involved who did not know the final result. Doesn't that prove my point? These people, upon finding out the result, should be very angry. They have every reason to come out with the truth, not the least of which includes fame, book deals, you name it. There's also ways of doing this without government retribution, especially at this point that doesn't matter. And the media will eat it up.

  • @robaquarian But then again, even if all the people involved in hypothetically staging 911 were loyal, a leak is STILL inevitable. You seem like a cynical person... you ought to know, money trumps loyalty every time. And there's big money in scandals. There's also a lot of people in this country who hate Bush, hate his administration, and would love to drag up skeletons about it.

    What this means, is that if anyone was involved in staging 9/11, the temptation to come clean is TREMENDOUS.

  • @robaquarian Why are you so mad? I care about the truth just as much as you apparently do. I just happen to look at all the facts and come to a different conclusion. I do this because I have no choice... it seems to be true. In this case, it seems like you have been misled. I think the videos that you have watched are misinformation, I don't think they're based on good science, they cherry pick facts and ignore others that don't support their case. How do you not realize that?

  • @robaquarian The debris most certainly fell faster, this can be seen very clearly by watching the full video. I suggest you search for a youtube video called "towers did not fall at free fall speed." You can also find pictures online. If you will do that for me, I'll even watch your A Priori video (even though I am not using A Priori reasoning.)

  • @robaquarian I actually don't know anything about an ISI guy and $100,000.

    Never heard of anyone testifying about bombs in the basement.

    Of course Giuilani was warned. A plane had crashed into the building. You make it sound like he was warned before that, but that is not the case. And although it's unprecedented, it certainly wasn't unreasonable for an engineer to warn them that the buildings might collapse due to structural damage.

  • @robaquarian I honestly don't know why Oswald's files are classified. That alone doesn't seem like much evidence of a conspiracy, though.

    You said Popular Mechanics has a "conflict of interests," but you didn't say what it is. What is it?

    Operation Northwoods does show that the govt is willing to carry out false flag attacks... but not ones involving civilian casualties, necessarily. There's a very big difference in scale. And of course it was rejected...

  • @robaquarian Look man, I just care about the truth. I care about it A LOT. I care about it so much that I am willing to sit here and discuss with you almost every single one of your claims, in detail.

    In addition to the fact that most of the 9/11 claims can be debunked individually, in the big picture it just doesn't make sense for the govt to do this. Even if they are capable of false flag, it's just not in their best interests to do this. It's way too risky for them.

  • The 9/11 attacks happened because Bush was incompetent, not malicious. When they did happened, his administration used it opportunistically to lead us into war. Yes, they lied to us. If it hadn't of happened, they could have easily found another excuse. Propaganda is a powerful tool; there's no need for incredibly risky and self-damaging false flag attacks that involve too many people to keep a lid on. It's impractical.

  • @Maytag99 yes bush was the one on guard at the airport that let them on the plane. or he was the cia agent in middle east and let the info go by without his knowing. no you idiot it was the cia and nsa and fbi not being able to work together. dont get me wrong bush was an idiot. but dont put it all on him.

  • used to think jessie was a bell end but just started listening to his interviews,what a fucking guy love someone who tells it like it is,how long before he meets with an accident?america could do with a few more men like him.take the fuckers down jessie but try keep away fromn alex jones he is fulll of shit

  • Jesse 2012

  • people like this host are annoying because he's so (ahh well, i don't know) non-commital about everything. It's time we start to stand for truth and justice, and the fence sitters are just as bad as the people who aren't helping

  • How can you be so ignorant to deny the facts?!

  • Jesse is straight up. He is exactly who America needs to restore and then lead our former republic. And TYT program is exactly what journalism was at one time. And needs to become again. Its information from a straight up source without the cencorship and sanctions that corperations and crooked politicians have placed upon them. But we can bet our asses that what's best for America is not what's best for the corperate media or the crooked politians that run it. Im discusted with this country

  • ack, I get irritated when people say "you were a Navy Seal."

    It's not a minor detail... he simply was never in the Seals. Ever. Period. He was a frogman. Nice of you to correct people, Jesse. Oh wait, that's right, you want to play on the misunderstanding 'cause it makes you look more badass.

  • @supowit I am pretty sure that there were no "Seals" durnig the VN era only "frogmen". If someone can document other please do so.

  • @kenf63

    There were seals. The frogmen unit was absorbed after vietnam, I think.

  • @kenf63 UDT and SEALs are completely interchangeable. UDTs go through BUD/S which stands for basic underwater demolition seal training.

  • 'If he admits Barrack Obama is the greatest president ever, you'll know it's torture.'

    LOL!

  • Hahaha omg that's the first time I've seen cenk lose an argument. Jesse PWNED him so bad. But that's because Jesse is right.

  • @Steelerguy6178 Jesse would simply absorb the bullets and strangle the assassin.

  • Jesse at 19:35 ...and then my son kept telling me about this thing on the internet called...LOOSE CHANGE... have you seen it?

    Cenk: "...I`ve read a lot about it, I´ve not seen it..."

    Either Cenk is lying or he is extremely naive...

    Oh, wait... I watched the rest of the interview now ...

    Cenk is "playing" naive, or he IS naive, or a mix of both, the latter imo being the case.

  • @sunamori6765 He's lying. He just doesn't want to lose his "credibility" like Ventura mentioned towards the end. I've seen first hand that if you even bring up the possiblity that it was a false flag people instantly lable you a foil hat wearer.

  • jesse ventura is a retard, 9/11 was obv not inside job!

  • @GPunktmod and its ppl like u that will wonder y in 2 years the world will crumble upon our stupidness and faults lol gg at not knowing all the facts u idoit

  • @madryboy agreed!