No way I'd patch up the SOB that tried to kill me, without first finishing the lesson. I wouldn't have killed him, but I would have beat the shit out of him first. Only when I saw true fear in his eyes and at MY mercy, would I then patch him up and give him aid. Show mercy to the enemy, but they had better respect you. That is equality.
You know how soldiers wear mag pouches in the front of the vest, I've always wondered why there aren't any stories of soldiers getting shot in the mags and their ammo getting destroyed or their grenades getting shot and go off on them.
The man saved the life of the one who tried to kill him. I don't know what others may think, but in my own opinion I think he's a REALLY good man deep inside. Human instinct is that if you encounter someone who tried to kill you, you'd try to kill him back. Having that said, the specialist didn't do that and instead did the opposite of saving the sniper's life. Like I said, I REALLY good man.
i keep hearing of ppl saying dragon skin is shit coz it didn't pass the militarys standard tests so why are top ranking generals an vips using it the only bad thing iv heard about it failing it the glue holding it to getting is coming apart under very high temps the 2ed reason the us army gave it a fail was becoz of the contracts they have with company making armor just like the us snipers have to use m24 rifles an Schmidt Bender scope coz they have fixed contracts
the US millitary budget is almost as high as all the budget of all other millitaries combined, they can efford 11 Billion$ (used to be 7 billion$) aircraft carriers, they can efford 2 billion$ stealth fighters but apperantly they can efford dragon skin for their troops. its disgusting how the US millitary has priority for useless strategic expansionism and not for their counter insurgency weapon- the troops.
Sorry I cannot provide the proof, though what I heard was they are using a more heat resistant material (obviously), I think it may have been a youtube video that was a recording of a news story with an interview and stuff that was saying "even though pinnacle has fixed the issues, the army still refuses to retest" or something like that. BTW I admit that "Metaphorical safety bubble" was poor word choice and I apologize. Now let's let's be civil and just forget about this.
"No western government can afford not to give their troops the best body armour available" (quote) .That is unless its the British government where the troops are lucky to get ANY body amour or at most one set between four guys!
When are they going to issue us troops dragon skin armor ? God damn government stop being cheap... Without us troops. You guys wouldn't be sitting in the office.
@Vietboy1st After 120 degrees farenheit, Dragon Skin stops working effectively. The plates fail to function properly, making it dangerous. There have been multiple tests where NATO bullets HAVE passed through.
Interceptor is doing pretty fine right now. Dragon Skin is great, under certain conditions. There still needs to be more research on it untill it can be made usefull to the army. Not to mention the Marines and the Navy tested 30 vests each, almost all failing under high temperatures.
@ShockwavesFTW srry to burst your bubble but pinnacle fixed the heat issue with more heat resistant material holding the plates, and still the military refused to retest *shakes head*.
@ShockwavesFTW So you would rather go off the "proof" that our government provides rather than Pinnacle? That's pathetic given all the corrupt bullshit our gov. has been in. Please use common sense instead of relying in other people to provide the truth (i.e the gov.).
@xenomorph856 you realize you're making absolutely no sense? I asked a simple question. Where is your proof that Pinnacle fixed the problem. I searched the Internet. I found nothing. Seems like you just pulled that out of your ass, didn't you?
Oh, and stop assuming. "When you assume you make an ASS out of U and ME"
I don't trust the government at all. "Metaphorical safety bubble", lolgtfo.
@Vietboy1st Dragon skin is a piece of shit. The adhesive that keeps the scales together fails to stick together at the hight temperatures that a prevalent in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Not only that but it only works if you shoot the armour when it's directly in front of you. Shoot them from the side and it will penetrate.
Also what's wrong with the arbour the US has now? It does its job, doesn't it? You fail to understand that the USA is in over $1,000,000,000,000 of debt.
@grobo11 but still i want to wear it instead of listening to the us military. Since it never got tested in the combat so you can't giving a result about it. The reason if u get shot on the side because u don't have side armor that's why. Dragon skin can provide you many option. And cost $3500 a piece.
@Vietboy1st You can only test something in combat if it passes the military's laboratory test's, dragon skin failed the laboratory test's therefore it cannot be put into implementation in the field. If you gave the armour to a unit of US GI's or Marines and let's say one of them got shot and the bullet penetrated due to it entering the armour via the kidney area and the scales couldn't hold, imagine how the media would react, the same media that trys to promote that same armour. Disatrous.
@grobo11 i have a feeling that the military lied about it.. because us military top generation and us secretary got to wear em.. due too the funding they would say no at this moment.. but with body armor or not you still die from explosive..
@Vietboy1st But when the military found out that the secret agencies were using them, they warned those members of staff and automatically banned it for all US govt purposes.
@Vietboy1st man there are some issues with this armour...for example u cant thrust it in hot weather... connections between small pieces are made of silikon and it looses their abilities in warm weather...
@xMartysx As a chemist I know that this is minor drawback. It would take 2 yrs top to develop new adhesive or choose from existing ones. Nothing a good team of researchers with money and time couldn't do. But yeah sometimes time and money are hard to come by. :)
Hight energy shield.
MsMartinsguilherme 1 month ago
No way I'd patch up the SOB that tried to kill me, without first finishing the lesson. I wouldn't have killed him, but I would have beat the shit out of him first. Only when I saw true fear in his eyes and at MY mercy, would I then patch him up and give him aid. Show mercy to the enemy, but they had better respect you. That is equality.
9b8 1 month ago
@9b8 i led them die, fucker trys to kill me i aint gonna save him when i shoot him, i want him to die when i shoot him
SuperMachinegunner 1 month ago
@9b8 words are cheap
Ralfenstein89 4 weeks ago
@Ralfenstein89 They sure are. That's why some people deserve an ass kicking from time to time.
9b8 4 weeks ago
Gotta take some guts to save the life of someone who just tried to kill you.
Crackpunch 2 months ago
@01:18
that Iraqi insurgent must be thinking "WTF...respawn?!"
alikos88 2 months ago
Oh man.. that guy was so brave.. and honorable! he got shot by a sniper, and later on patch that sniper wound..
AnimeGod1995 5 months ago
@AnimeGod1995 Yeah, I would've punched him first.
atjnAdfhhjea 1 month ago
You know how soldiers wear mag pouches in the front of the vest, I've always wondered why there aren't any stories of soldiers getting shot in the mags and their ammo getting destroyed or their grenades getting shot and go off on them.
SantoryuWazamono 6 months ago
did i see a mark 1 armor in 2:42?
BensonChu24 9 months ago
shitterer lol
Z999Artur 10 months ago 2
The man saved the life of the one who tried to kill him. I don't know what others may think, but in my own opinion I think he's a REALLY good man deep inside. Human instinct is that if you encounter someone who tried to kill you, you'd try to kill him back. Having that said, the specialist didn't do that and instead did the opposite of saving the sniper's life. Like I said, I REALLY good man.
soldier167 10 months ago
i keep hearing of ppl saying dragon skin is shit coz it didn't pass the militarys standard tests so why are top ranking generals an vips using it the only bad thing iv heard about it failing it the glue holding it to getting is coming apart under very high temps the 2ed reason the us army gave it a fail was becoz of the contracts they have with company making armor just like the us snipers have to use m24 rifles an Schmidt Bender scope coz they have fixed contracts
shadow2155 10 months ago
God, if I was hit by a bullet, I would "Schitterer" myself.
PintSizedSlasherJr 11 months ago
Dragon skin is a fraud. Theres way better body armors out there. Cheaper too.
moOswe 1 year ago
actually the first bulletproof vest created was in korea in 1960. Its called myeonje-baegab
kahuna028 1 year ago
no country cant create the best body armor because usa will create a high caliber bullet to penetrate it
kratosson1 1 year ago
@kratosson1 but other countries have the same caliber to penetrate interceptor armors easily also
kahuna028 1 year ago
Medic Motto : Do no harm, do know harm. lol
Vietboy1st 1 year ago
the US millitary budget is almost as high as all the budget of all other millitaries combined, they can efford 11 Billion$ (used to be 7 billion$) aircraft carriers, they can efford 2 billion$ stealth fighters but apperantly they can efford dragon skin for their troops. its disgusting how the US millitary has priority for useless strategic expansionism and not for their counter insurgency weapon- the troops.
wizzzer1337 1 year ago
well new body armor means rifles and guns will start using higher caliber bullets
SuperSylar1 1 year ago
Sorry I cannot provide the proof, though what I heard was they are using a more heat resistant material (obviously), I think it may have been a youtube video that was a recording of a news story with an interview and stuff that was saying "even though pinnacle has fixed the issues, the army still refuses to retest" or something like that. BTW I admit that "Metaphorical safety bubble" was poor word choice and I apologize. Now let's let's be civil and just forget about this.
Okay? Cya : )
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@xenomorph856 haha, good enough :)
ShockwavesFTW 1 year ago
come on america if your willing to spend 22billion on one aircraft carrier then you can deifinitly afford dragonskin armor
9000treehugger 1 year ago
"No western government can afford not to give their troops the best body armour available" (quote) .That is unless its the British government where the troops are lucky to get ANY body amour or at most one set between four guys!
silver760 1 year ago
it's not match for a nanosuit of a spartans armor >.> lol too much video games lol.!
fatmanontherun 2 years ago 16
@fatmanontherun spartan body armour is just full coverage body armour. It's already being done. :D
MultiMan120 5 days ago
When are they going to issue us troops dragon skin armor ? God damn government stop being cheap... Without us troops. You guys wouldn't be sitting in the office.
Vietboy1st 2 years ago 32
@Vietboy1st After 120 degrees farenheit, Dragon Skin stops working effectively. The plates fail to function properly, making it dangerous. There have been multiple tests where NATO bullets HAVE passed through.
Interceptor is doing pretty fine right now. Dragon Skin is great, under certain conditions. There still needs to be more research on it untill it can be made usefull to the army. Not to mention the Marines and the Navy tested 30 vests each, almost all failing under high temperatures.
ShockwavesFTW 1 year ago
@ShockwavesFTW srry to burst your bubble but pinnacle fixed the heat issue with more heat resistant material holding the plates, and still the military refused to retest *shakes head*.
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@xenomorph856 Burst my bubble? Do you have any proof? If not than, your comment is irrelevant.
And did you get that second part off Wikipedia? Cause I'm pretty sure I read it off there (about the high profile personnell)
ShockwavesFTW 1 year ago
@ShockwavesFTW So you would rather go off the "proof" that our government provides rather than Pinnacle? That's pathetic given all the corrupt bullshit our gov. has been in. Please use common sense instead of relying in other people to provide the truth (i.e the gov.).
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@xenomorph856 you realize you're making absolutely no sense? I asked a simple question. Where is your proof that Pinnacle fixed the problem. I searched the Internet. I found nothing. Seems like you just pulled that out of your ass, didn't you?
Oh, and stop assuming. "When you assume you make an ASS out of U and ME"
I don't trust the government at all. "Metaphorical safety bubble", lolgtfo.
ShockwavesFTW 1 year ago
@ShockwavesFTW lol srry I did not make last comment a reply. Just read comment below this one.
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@ShockwavesFTW and yes, I'm sorry to burst the metaphorical safety bubble you think the Gov. provides.
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@ShockwavesFTW one more thing, were you aware that high profile knowingly wore dragon armor, as well as security for high profile personnel?
xenomorph856 1 year ago
@Vietboy1st Dragon skin is a piece of shit. The adhesive that keeps the scales together fails to stick together at the hight temperatures that a prevalent in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Not only that but it only works if you shoot the armour when it's directly in front of you. Shoot them from the side and it will penetrate.
Also what's wrong with the arbour the US has now? It does its job, doesn't it? You fail to understand that the USA is in over $1,000,000,000,000 of debt.
grobo11 1 year ago
@grobo11 but still i want to wear it instead of listening to the us military. Since it never got tested in the combat so you can't giving a result about it. The reason if u get shot on the side because u don't have side armor that's why. Dragon skin can provide you many option. And cost $3500 a piece.
Vietboy1st 1 year ago
@Vietboy1st You can only test something in combat if it passes the military's laboratory test's, dragon skin failed the laboratory test's therefore it cannot be put into implementation in the field. If you gave the armour to a unit of US GI's or Marines and let's say one of them got shot and the bullet penetrated due to it entering the armour via the kidney area and the scales couldn't hold, imagine how the media would react, the same media that trys to promote that same armour. Disatrous.
grobo11 1 year ago
@grobo11 i have a feeling that the military lied about it.. because us military top generation and us secretary got to wear em.. due too the funding they would say no at this moment.. but with body armor or not you still die from explosive..
Vietboy1st 1 year ago
@Vietboy1st But when the military found out that the secret agencies were using them, they warned those members of staff and automatically banned it for all US govt purposes.
grobo11 1 year ago
@Vietboy1st cause the gov. is broke and army is not getting paid basically,well not anymore
woohoman232 10 months ago
@Vietboy1st Bastard politicians. They start the wars others have to fight them
TheWhoaDude 8 months ago
@Vietboy1st man there are some issues with this armour...for example u cant thrust it in hot weather... connections between small pieces are made of silikon and it looses their abilities in warm weather...
xMartysx 7 months ago
@xMartysx how do you know that ? Did you own one ?
Vietboy1st 7 months ago
@xMartysx As a chemist I know that this is minor drawback. It would take 2 yrs top to develop new adhesive or choose from existing ones. Nothing a good team of researchers with money and time couldn't do. But yeah sometimes time and money are hard to come by. :)
EnhancedNightmare 2 months ago