It's all one humongous scam. The world elite, world banksters and the world's court systems are all in bed together, lying, deceiving & controlling their global chattel...or should I say "human cattle." But Almighty Yahweh shall has the final Word...and the Last Laugh. "Every knee shall bow."
If you are not personally threatened under a Federal Law, In a manner different from the general enforcement of the Law, upon the General Public. Then you are not in a position to challenge it, and the Courts are not in a position to rule upon it.
Fact: The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
The explanation on freedom to bring a case would seem to support the argument that phil Berg does not have standing to challenge Obama's occupation of the Oval office, as he is not uniquely damaged by that occupation.
It probably requires a party to a case to argue that because Obama is not a natural born citizen, that any bill he signed whilst in occupation of the oval office has not become law, because he, Obama, was not legally president.
Or would the 10 day rule destroy such an argument?
@christianpatriot125 .. I think the "standing issue" is a way the Court can get out of hearing the case. The Military people that brought suit should have standing since POTUS is Commander in Chief. I don't see how the 10 day rule would apply since it was not presented to the POTUS but an imposter, if BHO is found to be unqualified.
"...It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon
by a belligerent claimant in person." - United States v Johnson
" 90% of all convictions are obtained by admissions and confessions unwittingly provided by the defendant himself" - Former Chief Justice Warren Berger
That nasty piece of shit makes me sick.
attorneydestroyusa 2 years ago
It's all one humongous scam. The world elite, world banksters and the world's court systems are all in bed together, lying, deceiving & controlling their global chattel...or should I say "human cattle." But Almighty Yahweh shall has the final Word...and the Last Laugh. "Every knee shall bow."
BillySeagull 2 years ago
The irreducible elements of standing are as follows:
1. Injury in Fact - Concrete and Particularized AND - Actual or Imminent
2. Proximate (arguably) Causation
3. Redressibility
It seems to bring such a suit and to get it heard on the merits, the first element of injury in fact would be the main issue
dferris85 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
***WAKE-UP***
Obama's stimulus at work!!!
LOOK what's going on around you!
Welcome to the "POLICE STATE"!!!!
The "STATES" real agenda is to protect the tyrannical government and criminal central banks/corporations. ***Follow the money***!!!
Who are the real terrorist? Do you know?
End the Fed!!!
thomastholin 2 years ago
Constitutional Challenges:
If you are not personally threatened under a Federal Law, In a manner different from the general enforcement of the Law, upon the General Public. Then you are not in a position to challenge it, and the Courts are not in a position to rule upon it.
Fact: The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
cryptoki 2 years ago
The explanation on freedom to bring a case would seem to support the argument that phil Berg does not have standing to challenge Obama's occupation of the Oval office, as he is not uniquely damaged by that occupation.
It probably requires a party to a case to argue that because Obama is not a natural born citizen, that any bill he signed whilst in occupation of the oval office has not become law, because he, Obama, was not legally president.
Or would the 10 day rule destroy such an argument?
christianpatriot125 2 years ago
@christianpatriot125 .. I think the "standing issue" is a way the Court can get out of hearing the case. The Military people that brought suit should have standing since POTUS is Commander in Chief. I don't see how the 10 day rule would apply since it was not presented to the POTUS but an imposter, if BHO is found to be unqualified.
sogairborne 2 years ago
On constitutional rights...
"...It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon
by a belligerent claimant in person." - United States v Johnson
" 90% of all convictions are obtained by admissions and confessions unwittingly provided by the defendant himself" - Former Chief Justice Warren Berger
NAGGERNUTZ 2 years ago
fantastic
EpicSlug 2 years ago 4