John & Mike Cappelletti (George Bush witch cousins) demolition company gutted & planted the explosives in WTC. Philadelphia Naval Business Center is where they obtained military grade explosives (nanothermite)--not hard to do when you couz is the Prez. Cousin Marvin Bush gave the Cappelletti demolition company clearance into the WTC garage to GUT & remove the contents. In 2000 LMCC world views art students photos show gutted floors, ceilings and walls. GELITIN built a balcony outside WTC1 flr 91
Oh, COME ON!!! Are you conspiracy idiots really so numb? Are your brains smaller than the hundreds who saw the plane clearly & obviously? Of course this couple is not lying! Listen to them! They don't know much about what they saw. Have you ever been to an accident? Most people have widely varying recollections of the events! High emotion causes confusion & blindness. Details are fuzzy, usually wrong. Most people don't know much about airplanes, directions, explosions, etc. anyway!
Oh, COME ON!!! Are you conspiracy idiots really so numb? Are your brains smaller than the hundreds who saw the plane clearly & obviously? Of course this couple is not lying! Listen to them! They don't know much about what they saw. Have you ever been to an accident? Most people have widely varying recollections of the events! High emotion causes confusion & blindness. Details are fuzzy, usually wrong. Most people don't know much about airplanes, directions, explosions, etc. anyway!
So if there wasnt any planes ...where r the ppl who were in in the planes wen they was reporting this shit n they were calling there familys from inside the airlines "KILLUMINATI"
@babyvill NO PLANES=NO passengers. 3000 vicsims were created for 911 INSURANCE FRAUD.
Why are 3000 victims of 9/11 missing from Social Security death list?
Death Master File -- the official record of 90 million deceased Americans who were issued Social Security cards since 1937 -- 6,298 deaths recorded ... in 2001
...absence in the federal file are NYC Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr., FD Chaplain Mychal Judge, Daniel Lewin, Akamai Technologies, Thomas Burnett Jr. COO, Thoratec Corp.
@babyvill grammar, Should be "...if there weren't any planes." There are no singulars in the subjunctive mode. "If" always starts a conditional statement--subjunctive mode.
@anthonyc31 I am not being paranoid. I know too many witches. I am from Pennsylvania (why flt 93 allegedly was in Shansville-witch state) My mother's family are witches, I have 5 cousins who I know are witches. My sister's husband's family are witches. People have dropped dead or have been hit by cars in my family. I know what witches do, Unfortunately, I didn't know they were all witches until 2007. John Cappelletti was my college BF, he is the grandson of Aleister Crowley, 666, baphomet.
Followers of Aleister Crowley & pagans who say they are descendants of Merovingian Dynasty, the fallen angels are the rulers of the world and intend to take their rightful places as rulers of the world. These men & women are Luciferian worshippers. 1997 was the kick off for ushering in the ANTICHRIST, staring with Princess Diana's ritual murder. 911 was far more complicated than pretending attacks, it was about blowing up Twin towers to expose ISIS, and set the NWO where LUCIFER rules the world.
ORDO AB CHAO, mason's motto. Witches, masons, occultists get POWER from demons, chaos feeds demons. 911 was set for a number of reasons by US govt who are worshippers of LUCIFER, followers of Aleister Crowley. Demonic rituals are give govt members POWER.
This suggests Russians did 911. Propaganda to cause chaos. Bush Cheney et al want to control Iraq & Sumerian secrets., Jim Marrs lecture on monoatomic gold: Bush wants the ancient antigravity and white gold secrets. Bush is a FRAT BOY.
The reason why the people said they didn't see the plane was because they were a few miles away from the WTC, the people who did see it were a few blocks away. There wasn't any HD cameras back in 2001, that's why you couldn't see the plane in the second clip
@pjDufour95 If you were co-mingled at the base of tall buildings it not likely you'd have a panorama view of the sky. Not much of a view I'd say.
HD cameras are likely a 20+ years old invention.
There also wasn't any possible way to make all those crystal-clear cell phone call from an airplane either but that didn't stop the Perps from crafting a wonderfully emotional fairytale.
No planes hit WTC1, WTC2 nor the Pentagon. Explosions went off at WTC 1 and WTC 2 and a missile hit the Pentagon. To see the detailed evidence, watch the Dimitri Khalezov 9/11 interview documentary on my channel. The 9/11 Truth Movements have been hijacked and are keeping people from the truth.
@anthonyc31 I watched the video w Dimitri Khalezov. The man interviewing him is so dumb, I am embarrassed for him. There were no planes, there were explosives planted in the buildings. The towers were gutted & prepped for demolition on 911. The Pentagon explaining is very logical.
You do know that 911 was a HUGE illusion.
Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti are illegitimate witch daughters of aleister Crowley conceived w sex magick (tantra) to be the antichrist. 911 was a day of mega ritual.
@074August I would focus on Dimitri's explanation and accept that the interview had his hands full trying to conduct a 4 hour in-depth technical conversation about 9/11 with Dimitri. "Towers gutted & prepped" ... i agree wrt the top floors only and possibly the lobby being rigged with explosives. 9/11 as it unfolded on TV and as it was reported by the schmedia was a total lie. I know all about the ocult angle as well .. you will appreciate this video: watch?v=7xhN0Byk5GQ
@anthonyc31 Wait, Dimitri says the U.S. govt had nothing to do with 911. Not true, 11 master occultists, Kabbalists, masons, witches were each in his/her assigned place on 911 by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London for the mega ritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorceror witch aunt, Ann Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il Duce Giuliani, Condi Rice, Scwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros and Saddam Hussein, 33 degree mason, not dead, needed to pull of the PLANE illusions. 93 is how witches sign off.
@074August Dimitri speculates that Mike Harari, the Mossad and Freemasons in the US orchestrated and executed 9/11. He does not directly call out specific US officials, however, his mentioning of the masons is a broad net. I believe Cheney, Rumsfeld etc. had to know based on the various suspicious actions they took. We can't expect Dimitri to solve 9/11 100%, so i suggest acknowledging his excellent explanation of the 9/11 events themselves, and continuing the research on who did it and why.
@anthonyc31 I post my research on David Icke forums. I got this message this morning:
"The witch made me come back. You know too much. I guess it won't hurt anything to tell you at this late stage that you are correct about the buildings being vacant, but it won't matter. No one will believe you after we get done. Our job is to discredit you."
Could be a joke. I am sure Witch Ann has people following me. I lived with the Cappellettis in1972 for a month in Upper Darby, PA. I know truth.
@074August Disinfo agents come out like wild hyenas when "no planes" is mentioned because it is the one truth they must hide. They will use every trick to try and discredit: "LOL" "hahahaha" "crazy" "nonsense" "witnesses saw planes" "my friend saw the plane hit" etc. etc. All total BS lies and disinfo techniques to try and discredit. Without "planes", there is no hijackers and no war on terror. They are willing to concede virtually all other claims, except no planes at the WTC.
@anthonyc31 I think the perps have a list of people they want to discredit and the vultures circle when one of the people logs on to the Internet. I guarantee the perps know when you logon. I am going to try to post a video of a sphere hitting the towers here. View it at full screen. I will send it to you in a PM.
@anthonyc31 Dimitri says US govt had nothing to do with 911. Not true, 11 master occultists, Kabbalists, masons, witches were each in his/her assigned place on 911 by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London for the mega ritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorceror witch aunt, Ann Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il Duce Giuliani, Condi Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros and Saddam Hussein, 33 degree mason, not dead, needed to pull of the PLANE illusions. 93 is how witches sign off.
Your video shows no evidence for ANYTHING you're trying to prove. So because you wanna believe the amateurs who said a rocket hit the building from a distance where you wouldn't be able to make out the "rocket" and you believe it? You are no different than the people who believe it was planes cuz people said "A plane hit it" NO EVIDENTIAL PROOF! prove to me how you know that woman filming the towers edited out the plane?? you show no valid proof at all how their weren't planes. fucking idiot
@Shorty4life333 This is a response video, relax on the name calling oh superior one and the the point of the video was to show not EVERYONE saw planes as is portrayed. The video is edited and I cant help you if you cant figure that out. I will agree that I cant prove that Bob and Bri edited the plane out, but the video is edited.
@JusticePetitioner I can agree I hear several sirens, however they are much louder before the :55 mark, after that i can only hear one which is very quite, I guess she could have edited it out which is why the police sirens sounded more distanced a couple seconds later, I'll agree with you half way but my main issue is there still isn't actual proof that they did cut it out, just a theory from the background noises when there were probably TONS of cop cars driving around the city that day.
@dieselford9184 *Shaking my head* You are either a troll or an ignorant US citizen. If you want to believe the official story, they are bandanna heads, not towel heads.
@JusticePetitioner Yes, she said it was a 'military plane'. Then he said it was 'a rocket or something'. The she said 'but that wasn't a plane'. Interesting variations on a very destructive event. You are welcome to view my compilation of videos, articles and interviews by Google searching: "My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism - by Bill Woollam"
I attempt to string it together re: the who, what, why and how.
am i the only person that noticed that thers 2 diff angel in the vids.
1st view the plane would have come from right to left
2ed view the plane would be coming stright at them.
your not gona see a plane coming if you cant see threw the building and smoke,PLUS your not looking for a second plane to hit so all you see is an explosion.
First of all, all of these videos that people create are fucking stupid. Not everyone can sit there and be able to correctly name off each kind of plane. Just because she said "military plane" does NOT mean it was. The other clip you have in here (1:19), how the FUCK is a guy supposed to see a plane from that far away?! COMMON SENSE PEOPLE!
Also, regarding the plane being "edited out," MAYBE she wasn't recording, and when she seen the second plane coming in, she hit record?!
Firstly, windows, logos and coloration is easily seen on planes 200 feet above your head. No one recalls any of those from the second plane. Now, the second video? He could see the plane, believe me. If you can see a plane crossing the sky in broad daylight over your head at 30-40,000 feet in altitude (much higher than both of the Twin Towers), I'm pretty sure he could see it from that distance. Especially if it were flying that low.
Anything is possible . Look up Hollywood knew about 911 or 911 in Hollywood and see the subliminal pre 911 coinsidences.
To show that rouge elements of the powers that be would pull this off, look up OPERATION NORTHWOODS, a plan by cia in 1960 to do staged atacks in the US and blame it on Cuban Rebels ( once classified documents are now public info due to Fredom Of Info. Act and Kennedy assntin investigation)
Your not doing anyone any favours even though you think you are. The second couples video showed no plane but the guy said - "you better send up the airforce" - why would he say that if there was no plane but merely explosions. What could the airforce do.
@JusticePetitioner nope he did not. i never said he saw a United Airlines Boeing 767. going that speed its really hard to tell what kind of plane it is especially since hes not a pilot. all im saying is he saw the second plane hit
@kaseyfan999 "i never said he saw a United Airlines Boeing 767"
Thats the point of the video if you bothered to watch it. Thats the plane that supposedly hit the tower. Not 'A' or 'the' plane. A UA 767 tail number N612UA.
This video says 'not all no planers think no planes hit the towers some think no commercial Boeing's hit them... there is a difference."
actually if you stoped watching recycled "lose change 9/11" fotage and did some of your own investigation you would know that a fully loaded Boeing 767 would tear itself appart at 587MPM due to overstressing of the plane. so the menuvers that plane was doing and turning befor impact the plane would have snaped in 2 befor it hit the building at a speed of 587MPH. so NO the plane was not going that fast.
@JusticePetitioner I was just being a dick. I'm a believer that there were no planes that day. If you're actually interested in learning more about 9/11 fakery, check Jeffrey Hill's 9/11 phone calls. I think he speaks to 2 actors from that production.
@JusticePetitioner I was just being a dick. I'm a believer that there were no planes that day. If you're actually interested in learning more about 9/11 fakery, check Jeffrey Hill's 9/11 phone calls. I think he speaks to 2 actors from that production.
@wsee - Yes the Psyop was on you. With the second couple the guy said - "they better send up the airforce" - why would he say that if there were no planes, what could the airforce do for exploding buildings? 911 was an inside job though. If they can edit in planes so easily they would have put out a better pentagon video and they would have put out a shanksville one for the hell of it.
I have asked them why the edit. they told me they simply didnt record it. they turned it off for a moment and put it back on when they saw the plane. LOL
They didn't edit out the plane. They released the footage onto the internet unedited 2 years ago. People have seen it. The footage was pulled off youtube edited and put back on. It was probably the government. Thats why it took them 5 years to even put the footage out there. They were obviously scared for their lives by what they had seen and recorded.
@SammyMcAwesome It was put on Google in 2006 and did not have a plane in it then. No one has seen any other version than the one released that was 25-30 minutes long. With no plane in it.
that the Heat of the Explosion, are too hot to be affected by the Vortices. But then i came aware of these Videos who clearly show that even in Napalm fire, Vortices are still present, as in normal Air.
Watch the 911 Videos in HD and look closely, there is no turbulence in the smoke or fire. This is only possible when there where no Planes. This might look as a small piece to the perps, but is in fact hard evidence...
Contd. Pre planted charges can look nice, but cant reproduce the real effect of Jet Engines Turbulence/Vortices." No real Planes @ 911 watch?v=Xlj1mVD2-HM&feature=related CBS News prez warned in 2000 about fake plane crashes watch?v=ZxVTIJEWBy4&NR=1 9/11 TV Fakery: Smoke & Mirrors (short version) watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=related Bob Kerrey, 911 commission, says 911 was a 30 yr conspiracy. watch?v=wDfm3NroVG8&feature=related 1st noplane watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=related
The reason you can't see it on the second shot is because the camera was too far away when United 175 hit; they zoomed in when the hijacked 767 already hit its target. And by the way, there is more than enough evidence to prove your bullshit to be what it is (REAL bullshit): photography, footage, witnesses from all around the world (many saw it live on TV) and the parents who now don't get to see their children, isn't that a fucking coincidence?
@jmfriedman123 witness' from around the world LOL, What dont people understand LIVE TV can be manipulated!! Before 9/11 and after 9/11. So please leave out the bs line of witness' around the world.
WTF are you talking about w/ your last line, what I am saying or what this video is about has nothing to do w/ saying people didnt die.
The couple said themselves, not thru a camera,said it wasnt a plane. Dont discredit these witness' when you are giving credit to people in China for seeing a plane.
@JusticePetitioner Regardless, the person who filmed it was too far away to make any accurate statements, but I can understand why they'd maybe assume that it was a rocket. And by the way, my friend's cousin was on board that plane. His name was Brian Sweeney, who'd talk to his dad on an airphone until the plane went in.
@jmfriedman123 Ahh knew it was only a matter of time before you "knew' someone on the planes. Guess what so didn't I and I know they haven't come home. If you want to believe your friends cousins plane flew into the towers more power to you, its just to bad that you are robbing him of justice and real answers to his death.
Im sure if the couple in the video saw a plane they wouldnt be to far away. Also
Google David Handschuh and then tell me he was too far away for what he saw.
@JusticePetitioner ok wat the fuck is wrong with u. thousands of people died on that day, my dad knew about 10 of them. 2 of them were on the actual plane. m dad was also going to be on that plane so shut the FUCK UP ABOUT UR STUPID FUCKING GAY ASS CONSPIRACYT THEORY U FUCKER!!
@TheBritishElf blah blah blah stfu. Stop playing on emotions and you might actually see whats going on. Everyone knows someone who knew someone who was supposed to be on the planes. I also knew people on the planes so again stfu.
To the stupid people who continue to post comments w/out watching the WHOLE video you will see this isnt about "no planes" hitting the tower. Its about them not being commercial Boeing 767's & the edits in tape.
If people want to believe they didnt catch these things fine, but you cant disregard "Bri" saying it was a military plane. Or the other "witness" who said it wasnt a plane or the guy saying it was a rocket.
People will defend this tape until we get to where she says its a military plane.
This is the most pathetic video ever. Don't watch this crap. JusticePetitioner, you need to get the heck out of our USA and go wherever, just leave our country for posting such crap.
the second plane was not edited out , who knew that it would happen a second time. Camera person just stopped video. dumbasses, the video from thousands of others show a plane hit the second tower. Stop your stupid comments and go educate yourselves. Morons.
EVERYONE CHECK THE FULL VIDEO YOURSELF BEFORE YOU COME TO CONCLUSION: BOB & BRI FOOTAGE, type in Bob & Bri & will pop up, its 26mins long. If she is part of the conspiracie WHY have they also realised the footage showing flashes & small explosions etc, therefore questioning the official story???!!!
If you watch the video properly the camera swings to the towers from the right which to me says she had the camera pointed away at the moment of impact then swings it round to film the explosion, i do believe about an inside job but you cant think that EVERY piece of film is part of the conspiracie,when she says its "insane" she is talking about the North tower 1st attack b4 the 2nd impact, she isnt talking about the 2nd impact b4 it happens.u no that thats why you left alot of it out.
if you watch the other video "what bob and bri saw".....look that they DON'T show any helicopter flying by the twin towers , and the mainstream media did show choppers flying by.
Has anyone tried to contact and interview or question BOB and BRI about this very suspicious video that was clearly edited to NOT show the 2nd supposed plane ?
If you watch this entire 30 minute vid on google video, at NO time does the video ever skip or jump. There are no clearly visible edits, not one single second at any other time in the entire 30 mins except,
at the very time the 2nd plane would have hit ! for some mysterious unexplained reason, thats the time when the tape skips frames ?
lol gee how ridiculous is that ! How blatantly obvious does this have to get so that people will realize whats goin on ????
Exactly right! The Feds would never have cut it out unless it showed - or failed to show - something critical. Kind of like what they did to the Zapruder film when they returned it to Abraham Zapruder.
But, I mean these "Bob and Bri" characters are so frickin' phony, too.
"We just SAW it!" (lol)
Who the fuck are they kidding?
People don't say "we just SAW it." They say, "It just now HAPPENED," or, "It just fucking happened NOW!" Or words to that effect.
Do we know for a fact that the Feds had this video in their possession before it was publicly released ?
Yes i will admit the woman talking sounds very scripted and phony. also just an observation, she sounds very 'ditzy' and not very bright , classic airhead lol
Is there anyway , or has anyone ever tried to contact these 2 anomynous people BOB and BRI ?
WHO are they and how can we contact them are the essential questions that should be asked
Is it possible that perhaps a MILITARY type plane really did strike, and she is correct in what she says
but the FBI edited the film showing the actual plane out ? But the obvious question then would be why would the FBI allow her voice in there claiming it was a Military plane, why not just edit out the image and her voice ?
the Mystery only deepens, did planes hit the WTC, will we ever know for sure hmmm
Well, they're always playing the Hegelian dialectic game, but setting up there own parameters to allow a certain amount of discussion and "feigned conflict" - but always OUTSIDE the range of the actual truth. That is why we see them leading the 911 truth movement itself ab initio.
911Taboo, however, clearly demonstrates the physical impossibility, according to Newton's 3rd law of motion, that ANY airplane could have glided effortlessly through steel beams as if they were simply made of butter.
yes i agree the 911 TABOO video really got me to critically think myself through this much better. However, 911 TABOO demonstrated only this concept regarding a Hollow fragile aluminum pssgr Jet.
For Example, whats your Opinion on a Much stronger heavier denser Military BOMBER plane being strong enough to penetrate the bldg like that ?
Obviously the degree of metal strength and durability is night and day between a Military Bomber and an Aluminum pssgr Jet.
Well, in 1945 a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State Building at an estimated speed of 300+ mph. Reading the articles, you'll see that the plane never even came close to completely penetrating the building, which doesn't even have, to my knowledge anyway, close to the amount of exterior steel support columns that the WTC had.
The only parts of that B-25 that penetrated the building were the engines and landing gear. The fuselage and wings fell mostly to the ground or atop other buildings.
The strongest and most conclusive evidence is, of course, Newton's laws of motion.
What people do know, however, albeit intuitively (and which I must have known for all the years I was a half-truther myself and in denial about the no planes hypothesis), is what faked videos looks like. Especially badly faked ones like these!
That is why no one has an excuse for believing the BIg Lie. All stand guilty who believe the media and government psychopaths.
yes but ive noticed huge similarities between the Moon Hoax, and the 911 scam. Especially with the Moon Hoax, the moment you begin to dare question its validity
You are bombarded with insults that you are a kook, loon, nut, crazy, and they try to intimidate you with very technical science and very specific Space NASA information.
they attempt to make you feel belittled that ONLY a space scientist can tell if we went to the Moon or not, the avg citizens opinion is worthless
But just like 911, when you question these Moon landing believers about very odd strange 'coincidences' they have No answers.
I believe this is a deliberate attempt to silence free expression and the ability to critically and logically think by the common citizen.
Truth is, you no more need to be a Scientist to understand why we Never went to the Moon, as that you Must by necessity, be an Engineer to explain why the Towers collapsed.
Yeah, definitely. Well, they're degenerate totalitarians masquerading as lovers of democracy.But Socrates wouldn't have even lasted a minute in the USA, though. Guy asked way too many questions, ya' know? lol
Yep, it is all very much common sense. Along with a true open mindedness.
My Italian immigrant grandfather, who was taken out of school in the 2nd grade, said the moon landing was phony as he watched it on TV in '69. I'll never ever forget it. We all thought he was just a "dumb dago."
lol i hear ya, turns out your Grandfather had great common sense
we can conclude that BOTH the Moon landing and 911 were devestating psychological 'shock and awe' Operations on the mentality of America for purely Political, social, cultural and of course, economic benefits for a segment of the ELITE of our socitey
To be honest to me the Moon Hoax is just like 911. In that there is no single solitary 'piece' of evidence that by itself convinces me that a scam has taken place.
So as far as the Moon goes, i cant say there is an AH HA moment where i can focus on 1 item and say HERE is the proof
However, if we take a comprehensive view of the ENTIRE picture of the Moon landing and consider the Science, Engineering, Political, Social and Economics of the event, its a scam
Yeah, as I was reading some of the comments "people" have posted at your channel, I can see the maliciousness.
You have the option of not allowing comments to be posted to your channel. I don't let people post at mine. If they want to be totalitarian pricks, they can do it at a video comment forum like this one.
So, you see now how the sick mind works. Some of those people are just whores who get paid a fast buck to assist in mass murder.
evil, you are right. in both the empire state building and the wtc, the plane never completely penetrated the building except for the engine and landing gear. How similiar they both are in that aspect.
Here we go once more, this absurdity just NEVER STOPS !
watch the video here at 1:21, the question i have is obvious , WHY doesnt the guy close up BEFORE the object hits ?
The video lens is set SOOO far away before the 2nd object hits. If that were me filming the 1st tower, and i had a zoom on my camera, i would have, and any reasonable person would have i think , zoomed in IMMEDIATELY to check out what was goin on .
hes so ridiculously far away that we cant see anything ! OF COURSE typical 911 'coincidence' he just happens to clearly zoom right in AFTER the 2nd object hits. when we cant see what it was that hit.
all the guy had to do was zoom in a little more and we could have seen what that Object was. But as with EVERYTHING ELSE practically with 911, it didnt happen and the mystery keeps chuggin along
mY Opinion is the 2nd video at 1:21 is just as fake and Suspicious as bob and bri
the guy is holding the shot at 1:21, WHY ? its so ridiculously far away that you cant see ANYTHING !
why would you not try to zoom in at 1st ? so if the 2nd explosiion never hit, he would have just kept the view at 100 miles away and basically looked at nothing ?
because the initial view he had was TOTALLY useless and was so far away, you might as well not even film it.
I'm not sure why he hadn't zoomed in earlier. That's a good point, but their astonishment is real astonishment v. the phony Bob and Bri.
Notice Bri's sarcastic closing comment, "Yeah, they're attacking the world trade center, not us."
#1: The media people are, in real time, now just intensely speculating that it SEEMS to be a terrorist attack, yet she states it so "matter of factly" - a case of BAD scripting.
#2: How does she know SHE won't be hit in a 3rd "plane"/terrorist attack?
Yes lol i noticed that also about Bri saying 'they're attack trade center not us' 1st time i heard her say that i was like WHAT ?
such an unatural odd weird thing to say when at the time its happening You cant possibly have any idea what precisely is happening.
Also too the way she said it so casually and calmly ! it was like 'yea whatever' Just doesnt add up. Not to be mean also but she sounds like a 'classic stereotypical Airhead, a real ditz
Regarding the 2nd couple at 1:21, yea their astonishment sounds real, but thats not enough to really put this whole thing to rest.
Video will trump Audio 10 times out of 10, thats where the real proof is obviously
its really sad when you think of it and so perplexing. That guy was in an EXCELLENT position to capture raw footage exact what hit the Bldg, and ooooooops he just 'happened' by a few seconds to have missed it.
also too i just realized, the 2nd couple filming, thats a VERY high powered zoom on that camera !!!!
Notice the incredible difference in his zoom. I have a pretty good video camera with a a zoom, and my zoom is NOWHERE near that powerful .
He starts out at what seems to be like 30 Miles away, and then all of sudden ZOOM, hes so close right on top of bldg where you can almost see the finite cracks in the concrete almost lol
He starts out like 30 miles away? Do you really belive your own bullshit? My sony camcorder has 20 times optical zoom and can definetely do that. The whole this is suspicious because you just dont understand what you are looking at.
Sorry, man, don't know the details on these two low-life NWO actor-clowns, who were the bad actors in this low-budget phony post-911 government propaganda production.
But if you can dig the phoniness, how about the Michael Hezarckani shot, huh? Now that low-life NWO mass-murder accomplice really takes the fucking cake for his phoniness and shitty acting skills! (lol)
"Oh, my God I cannot believe it..." is SO FUCKING PHONY!
Check out how badly Killtown nails this prick at: /watch?v=X5i07-kHgww
So, to have that kind of complete penetration and explosive power through the 240 exterior steel support column framework (60 on each side) of the WTC towers, it most likely was a some type of missile, although DEWs should not to be excluded either.
Also im confused on if a Plane , be it Military or American Airlines Jet, actually did crash into WTC
wouldnt thousands of people have heard the extremely LOUD noise overhead of the plane flying on its way into wtc ?
correct me if im wrong, but my understanding is the ' supposed plane' was flying very Low and would have been clearly visible and heard about 3 miles away leading up to hitting WTC.
DEW = Directed Energy Weapons; a favorite topic of Nico Haupt (the guy who ALMOST got as loud as Alex Jones a couple times and never heard the end of it.)
Yep, excellent point! Not only does it seem no reliable witnesses heard the 2nd "airplane" coming in that low (which every person watching that burning tower would have seen and heard a "2nd" time), most of the faked videos didn't even bother to add the sound of the "airplane." That's how piss-fucking poor these fake videos are! (lol)
in other words, while i Definitely have totally ruled out the Plane being an American Airlines jet as clearly the videos show a very dark grey almost black plane with No windows, so i ruled that out
But could there have been a real plane hitting WTC but they were heavy duty Reinforced Military bomber planes ?
Well, there could be no airplane reinforced that much to completely penetrate steel beams. If so, it would never get off the ground.
Also watch all the clips of the non-faked witnesses to the explosion. They never mention an airplane. If a military plane had actually been there, then the legitimate witnesses would have seen that kind, also.
They had to make it look like the whole thing wasn't so scripted, hence the predesignated early "confusion" over what actually hit the WTC.
Watch September Clues, also, in addition to 911Taboo. I gad to watch both docs a few times before it all made sense.
There ARE actually two clips with NO plane in them. In the one, they later inserted a little "ball," not really big enough to be an airplane. In the other one, (I'm not actually sure if it's actually in September Clues), there seems to be nothing at all.
If you want one of the best forums to go to - where you'll find Genghis 6199 and other cutting-edge "no planers" - go to DJShure's "pumpitout-dot-com."
I'm sure you'll find a lot of great info there and hopefully the best answers available to any questions you have from whole-truthers, as opposed to half-truthers.
My grade 12 media class studied the TV fakery involved in 9/11. I think it is quite obvious that the government used its control over the mainstream media to air faked planes in order to support the military's plans for wars in the Middle East. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES, 911 TABOO, etc.
theres a big cut in this vid at 0:55
CYCOBEATZ 2 months ago
she sayin it was a military plane
CYCOBEATZ 2 months ago
JusticePetitioner are you stupid? There were thousands in Manhattan who saw a plane. Its not an hologram or 3D animation
CarlosBcn1989 4 months ago
Here's a conspiracy theory for ya.... maybe TWO PLANES HIT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER !!!
Yeah, I know. Hard to believe, huh !!!
Love how "truthers" don't believe planes hit....yet ALSO have meticulous views and comments of WHEN planes hit !
So which is it !? Did planes hit ? (Some say NO planes) And when they DID hit they weren't passenger planes ?) So where did all the dead people go ?
Living in Argentina with Hitler and Kennedy...and oh yeah, the REAL Paul McCartney that "died" in 1966.
TacomaPaul 5 months ago
John & Mike Cappelletti (George Bush witch cousins) demolition company gutted & planted the explosives in WTC. Philadelphia Naval Business Center is where they obtained military grade explosives (nanothermite)--not hard to do when you couz is the Prez. Cousin Marvin Bush gave the Cappelletti demolition company clearance into the WTC garage to GUT & remove the contents. In 2000 LMCC world views art students photos show gutted floors, ceilings and walls. GELITIN built a balcony outside WTC1 flr 91
074August 5 months ago
have any of u thought of microexpression
funnyman2150 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oh, COME ON!!! Are you conspiracy idiots really so numb? Are your brains smaller than the hundreds who saw the plane clearly & obviously? Of course this couple is not lying! Listen to them! They don't know much about what they saw. Have you ever been to an accident? Most people have widely varying recollections of the events! High emotion causes confusion & blindness. Details are fuzzy, usually wrong. Most people don't know much about airplanes, directions, explosions, etc. anyway!
ProChoiceJesus 5 months ago
Oh, COME ON!!! Are you conspiracy idiots really so numb? Are your brains smaller than the hundreds who saw the plane clearly & obviously? Of course this couple is not lying! Listen to them! They don't know much about what they saw. Have you ever been to an accident? Most people have widely varying recollections of the events! High emotion causes confusion & blindness. Details are fuzzy, usually wrong. Most people don't know much about airplanes, directions, explosions, etc. anyway!
ProChoiceJesus 5 months ago
So if there wasnt any planes ...where r the ppl who were in in the planes wen they was reporting this shit n they were calling there familys from inside the airlines "KILLUMINATI"
babyvill 5 months ago
@babyvill NO PLANES=NO passengers. 3000 vicsims were created for 911 INSURANCE FRAUD.
Why are 3000 victims of 9/11 missing from Social Security death list?
Death Master File -- the official record of 90 million deceased Americans who were issued Social Security cards since 1937 -- 6,298 deaths recorded ... in 2001
...absence in the federal file are NYC Fire Chief Peter Ganci Jr., FD Chaplain Mychal Judge, Daniel Lewin, Akamai Technologies, Thomas Burnett Jr. COO, Thoratec Corp.
074August 5 months ago
@babyvill grammar, Should be "...if there weren't any planes." There are no singulars in the subjunctive mode. "If" always starts a conditional statement--subjunctive mode.
074August 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 I am not being paranoid. I know too many witches. I am from Pennsylvania (why flt 93 allegedly was in Shansville-witch state) My mother's family are witches, I have 5 cousins who I know are witches. My sister's husband's family are witches. People have dropped dead or have been hit by cars in my family. I know what witches do, Unfortunately, I didn't know they were all witches until 2007. John Cappelletti was my college BF, he is the grandson of Aleister Crowley, 666, baphomet.
074August 5 months ago
Followers of Aleister Crowley & pagans who say they are descendants of Merovingian Dynasty, the fallen angels are the rulers of the world and intend to take their rightful places as rulers of the world. These men & women are Luciferian worshippers. 1997 was the kick off for ushering in the ANTICHRIST, staring with Princess Diana's ritual murder. 911 was far more complicated than pretending attacks, it was about blowing up Twin towers to expose ISIS, and set the NWO where LUCIFER rules the world.
074August 5 months ago
ORDO AB CHAO, mason's motto. Witches, masons, occultists get POWER from demons, chaos feeds demons. 911 was set for a number of reasons by US govt who are worshippers of LUCIFER, followers of Aleister Crowley. Demonic rituals are give govt members POWER.
This suggests Russians did 911. Propaganda to cause chaos. Bush Cheney et al want to control Iraq & Sumerian secrets., Jim Marrs lecture on monoatomic gold: Bush wants the ancient antigravity and white gold secrets. Bush is a FRAT BOY.
074August 5 months ago
The reason why the people said they didn't see the plane was because they were a few miles away from the WTC, the people who did see it were a few blocks away. There wasn't any HD cameras back in 2001, that's why you couldn't see the plane in the second clip
pjDufour95 8 months ago
@pjDufour95 David Handschuh
JusticePetitioner 8 months ago
@pjDufour95 If you were co-mingled at the base of tall buildings it not likely you'd have a panorama view of the sky. Not much of a view I'd say.
HD cameras are likely a 20+ years old invention.
There also wasn't any possible way to make all those crystal-clear cell phone call from an airplane either but that didn't stop the Perps from crafting a wonderfully emotional fairytale.
GnosticNinja 5 months ago
No planes hit WTC1, WTC2 nor the Pentagon. Explosions went off at WTC 1 and WTC 2 and a missile hit the Pentagon. To see the detailed evidence, watch the Dimitri Khalezov 9/11 interview documentary on my channel. The 9/11 Truth Movements have been hijacked and are keeping people from the truth.
anthonyc31 8 months ago
@anthonyc31 I watched the video w Dimitri Khalezov. The man interviewing him is so dumb, I am embarrassed for him. There were no planes, there were explosives planted in the buildings. The towers were gutted & prepped for demolition on 911. The Pentagon explaining is very logical.
You do know that 911 was a HUGE illusion.
Barbara Bush & Ann Cappelletti are illegitimate witch daughters of aleister Crowley conceived w sex magick (tantra) to be the antichrist. 911 was a day of mega ritual.
074August 5 months ago
@074August I would focus on Dimitri's explanation and accept that the interview had his hands full trying to conduct a 4 hour in-depth technical conversation about 9/11 with Dimitri. "Towers gutted & prepped" ... i agree wrt the top floors only and possibly the lobby being rigged with explosives. 9/11 as it unfolded on TV and as it was reported by the schmedia was a total lie. I know all about the ocult angle as well .. you will appreciate this video: watch?v=7xhN0Byk5GQ
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 Wait, Dimitri says the U.S. govt had nothing to do with 911. Not true, 11 master occultists, Kabbalists, masons, witches were each in his/her assigned place on 911 by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London for the mega ritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorceror witch aunt, Ann Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il Duce Giuliani, Condi Rice, Scwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros and Saddam Hussein, 33 degree mason, not dead, needed to pull of the PLANE illusions. 93 is how witches sign off.
074August 5 months ago
@074August Dimitri speculates that Mike Harari, the Mossad and Freemasons in the US orchestrated and executed 9/11. He does not directly call out specific US officials, however, his mentioning of the masons is a broad net. I believe Cheney, Rumsfeld etc. had to know based on the various suspicious actions they took. We can't expect Dimitri to solve 9/11 100%, so i suggest acknowledging his excellent explanation of the 9/11 events themselves, and continuing the research on who did it and why.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 I post my research on David Icke forums. I got this message this morning:
"The witch made me come back. You know too much. I guess it won't hurt anything to tell you at this late stage that you are correct about the buildings being vacant, but it won't matter. No one will believe you after we get done. Our job is to discredit you."
Could be a joke. I am sure Witch Ann has people following me. I lived with the Cappellettis in1972 for a month in Upper Darby, PA. I know truth.
074August 5 months ago
@074August Disinfo agents come out like wild hyenas when "no planes" is mentioned because it is the one truth they must hide. They will use every trick to try and discredit: "LOL" "hahahaha" "crazy" "nonsense" "witnesses saw planes" "my friend saw the plane hit" etc. etc. All total BS lies and disinfo techniques to try and discredit. Without "planes", there is no hijackers and no war on terror. They are willing to concede virtually all other claims, except no planes at the WTC.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 I think the perps have a list of people they want to discredit and the vultures circle when one of the people logs on to the Internet. I guarantee the perps know when you logon. I am going to try to post a video of a sphere hitting the towers here. View it at full screen. I will send it to you in a PM.
074August 5 months ago
@anthonyc31 Dimitri says US govt had nothing to do with 911. Not true, 11 master occultists, Kabbalists, masons, witches were each in his/her assigned place on 911 by Strategic Communication Laboratories, London for the mega ritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorceror witch aunt, Ann Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il Duce Giuliani, Condi Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros and Saddam Hussein, 33 degree mason, not dead, needed to pull of the PLANE illusions. 93 is how witches sign off.
074August 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!
SUPERRTERGAMER1 8 months ago
Could the actor they hired for the second video have sounded like any more of a meathead fratboy?
peterp21 8 months ago
16 seconds from visible detonation to detonationsound. probale distance 5.3km in second clip.
Tsutomu6 8 months ago
Your video shows no evidence for ANYTHING you're trying to prove. So because you wanna believe the amateurs who said a rocket hit the building from a distance where you wouldn't be able to make out the "rocket" and you believe it? You are no different than the people who believe it was planes cuz people said "A plane hit it" NO EVIDENTIAL PROOF! prove to me how you know that woman filming the towers edited out the plane?? you show no valid proof at all how their weren't planes. fucking idiot
Shorty4life333 9 months ago
@Shorty4life333 This is a response video, relax on the name calling oh superior one and the the point of the video was to show not EVERYONE saw planes as is portrayed. The video is edited and I cant help you if you cant figure that out. I will agree that I cant prove that Bob and Bri edited the plane out, but the video is edited.
JusticePetitioner 9 months ago
@JusticePetitioner Okay I take back the 'fucking idiot' but the rest stands.
Shorty4life333 9 months ago
@Shorty4life333 Will you agree the tape is edited? To prove my point is the continuous audio (sirens) at :54-:58 despite a cut in video.
JusticePetitioner 9 months ago
@JusticePetitioner I can agree I hear several sirens, however they are much louder before the :55 mark, after that i can only hear one which is very quite, I guess she could have edited it out which is why the police sirens sounded more distanced a couple seconds later, I'll agree with you half way but my main issue is there still isn't actual proof that they did cut it out, just a theory from the background noises when there were probably TONS of cop cars driving around the city that day.
Shorty4life333 9 months ago
gosh, that guy has a very limited vocabulary
manoman0 11 months ago
One question: where are that PLAIN
vukicevicdanile 11 months ago
god damn towel heads!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dieselford9184 11 months ago
@dieselford9184 *Shaking my head* You are either a troll or an ignorant US citizen. If you want to believe the official story, they are bandanna heads, not towel heads.
JusticePetitioner 11 months ago 3
@JusticePetitioner Yes, she said it was a 'military plane'. Then he said it was 'a rocket or something'. The she said 'but that wasn't a plane'. Interesting variations on a very destructive event. You are welcome to view my compilation of videos, articles and interviews by Google searching: "My Thoughts on 9/11 and False Flag Terrorism - by Bill Woollam"
I attempt to string it together re: the who, what, why and how.
Chidanandaji 11 months ago
@JusticePetitioner im inclined to believe that you may be retarded
browneye870 5 months ago
am i the only person that noticed that thers 2 diff angel in the vids.
1st view the plane would have come from right to left
2ed view the plane would be coming stright at them.
your not gona see a plane coming if you cant see threw the building and smoke,PLUS your not looking for a second plane to hit so all you see is an explosion.
stangbanger856 1 year ago
@stangbanger856 In both angles, the plane should be visible, according to official flight
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
the "planes" only ever appeared on tv.
why can't people distinguish tv from reality
cartoonplanes 1 year ago
First of all, all of these videos that people create are fucking stupid. Not everyone can sit there and be able to correctly name off each kind of plane. Just because she said "military plane" does NOT mean it was. The other clip you have in here (1:19), how the FUCK is a guy supposed to see a plane from that far away?! COMMON SENSE PEOPLE!
Also, regarding the plane being "edited out," MAYBE she wasn't recording, and when she seen the second plane coming in, she hit record?!
NeomicGamer 1 year ago
@NeomicGamer
Firstly, windows, logos and coloration is easily seen on planes 200 feet above your head. No one recalls any of those from the second plane. Now, the second video? He could see the plane, believe me. If you can see a plane crossing the sky in broad daylight over your head at 30-40,000 feet in altitude (much higher than both of the Twin Towers), I'm pretty sure he could see it from that distance. Especially if it were flying that low.
SorrowfulLesson 11 months ago
they seem so calm about it. like " oh look those buildings spontaneously combusted
igothemdiabetiesinme 1 year ago
Anything is possible . Look up Hollywood knew about 911 or 911 in Hollywood and see the subliminal pre 911 coinsidences.
To show that rouge elements of the powers that be would pull this off, look up OPERATION NORTHWOODS, a plan by cia in 1960 to do staged atacks in the US and blame it on Cuban Rebels ( once classified documents are now public info due to Fredom Of Info. Act and Kennedy assntin investigation)
shariefwat 1 year ago
at 1.37 you actualy hear the misile strike
not a plane crash
about 2.oo you hear a plane flying overhead
weadone 1 year ago
at 1.37 you actualy hear the misile strike
not a plane crash
weadone 1 year ago
Your not doing anyone any favours even though you think you are. The second couples video showed no plane but the guy said - "you better send up the airforce" - why would he say that if there was no plane but merely explosions. What could the airforce do.
AdeptAlbatross 1 year ago
my own cousin saw the plane you people are delusional and need mental help
kaseyfan999 1 year ago
@kaseyfan999 And I am sure your cousin at that time knew exactly what a United Airlines Boeing 767 going 587 mph looked like.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@JusticePetitioner nope he did not. i never said he saw a United Airlines Boeing 767. going that speed its really hard to tell what kind of plane it is especially since hes not a pilot. all im saying is he saw the second plane hit
kaseyfan999 1 year ago
@kaseyfan999 "i never said he saw a United Airlines Boeing 767"
Thats the point of the video if you bothered to watch it. Thats the plane that supposedly hit the tower. Not 'A' or 'the' plane. A UA 767 tail number N612UA.
This video says 'not all no planers think no planes hit the towers some think no commercial Boeing's hit them... there is a difference."
Even the lady in the video says "military plane".
Thats what she saw and its not a Boeing.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@JusticePetitioner
actually if you stoped watching recycled "lose change 9/11" fotage and did some of your own investigation you would know that a fully loaded Boeing 767 would tear itself appart at 587MPM due to overstressing of the plane. so the menuvers that plane was doing and turning befor impact the plane would have snaped in 2 befor it hit the building at a speed of 587MPH. so NO the plane was not going that fast.
stangbanger856 1 year ago
@stangbanger856 What are you talking about?
I dont use Loose Change footage.I dont agree w/ Loose Change.
The rest of your comment I agree w/.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@stangbanger856 I dont use LC videos, I dont promote LC and I dont agree w/ LC.
As for the speed of the plane.. that is official my friend, that is what the government claims the speed was.
Take up those issues w/ them..
I agree the plane would stress itself out.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JusticePetitioner I was just being a dick. I'm a believer that there were no planes that day. If you're actually interested in learning more about 9/11 fakery, check Jeffrey Hill's 9/11 phone calls. I think he speaks to 2 actors from that production.
ghostbustersfreak 1 year ago
Why was the second plane cut form this version?
ghostbustersfreak 1 year ago
@ghostbustersfreak There was no plane in this 'version' Bob and Bri did NOT have a plane in their video.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
Comment removed
ghostbustersfreak 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JusticePetitioner I was just being a dick. I'm a believer that there were no planes that day. If you're actually interested in learning more about 9/11 fakery, check Jeffrey Hill's 9/11 phone calls. I think he speaks to 2 actors from that production.
ghostbustersfreak 1 year ago
You people are all fucked in the head.
jme6141994 1 year ago
@jme6141994 I know. They are are really fucking retarded.
poopsyproductions 1 year ago
@poopsyproductions PSYOP PRODUCTIONS IS WHAT IT IS MATE!!!!
no planes crashed anywhere on 911...
wsee 1 year ago
@wsee - Yes the Psyop was on you. With the second couple the guy said - "they better send up the airforce" - why would he say that if there were no planes, what could the airforce do for exploding buildings? 911 was an inside job though. If they can edit in planes so easily they would have put out a better pentagon video and they would have put out a shanksville one for the hell of it.
AdeptAlbatross 1 year ago
I BELIEVE THERE IS A CONSPIRACY, BUT IT WAS THE GOVERNMENT WHO CONSPIRED TO COMMIT THIS DIABOLICAL ACT.
kinlochighlander 1 year ago
I have asked them why the edit. they told me they simply didnt record it. they turned it off for a moment and put it back on when they saw the plane. LOL
ChristianHolloway 1 year ago
so if it wasn't a plane where did the second plane that was hijacked go?
tomhigton 1 year ago
1:33 HOLY FUUUUCK!
marco00ve 1 year ago
They didn't edit out the plane. They released the footage onto the internet unedited 2 years ago. People have seen it. The footage was pulled off youtube edited and put back on. It was probably the government. Thats why it took them 5 years to even put the footage out there. They were obviously scared for their lives by what they had seen and recorded.
SammyMcAwesome 1 year ago
@SammyMcAwesome It was put on Google in 2006 and did not have a plane in it then. No one has seen any other version than the one released that was 25-30 minutes long. With no plane in it.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@JusticePetitioner I shouldnt say no one.. I should have said no one that isnt involved in the coverup.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
holyyyyyyyyyy fuck :D
ShEePOwTeR 1 year ago
How many different videos use this woman's voice?
074August 1 year ago 15
THEY PROBOBABBLY EDITED IT OUT BECAUSE THEY DIDNT WANT U TO SEE PEOPLE DYING U IDIOT
TheBritishElf 1 year ago
@TheBritishElf Whos the idiot now they said they didnt edit it, they just didnt catch it.. again STFU!!
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@074August I agree they dont have much od a vocabulary. Both sides of this aegument are very convincing, as now i dont know what to believe.
TheBritishElf 1 year ago
@TheBritishElf yea August didnt get the message you replied to my comment.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@TheBritishElf No vortices in the smoke means there were no planes. [btw, these people don't have much of a vocabulary, do they?]
I didn't see a plane, did you?
No real Planes @ 911
watch?v=Xlj1mVD2-HM&feature=related
posted on No real Planes @ 911
"ATTENTION!
On all Videotapes of the 1st and 2nd strike
there is no Vortex visible.
I came aware of this when Factfinder general on Pilots for Truth told me half a year ago. Back then Rob Balsamo, Pilot, made me skeptic saying...
more
074August 1 year ago
Contd.
that the Heat of the Explosion, are too hot to be affected by the Vortices. But then i came aware of these Videos who clearly show that even in Napalm fire, Vortices are still present, as in normal Air.
Watch the 911 Videos in HD and look closely, there is no turbulence in the smoke or fire. This is only possible when there where no Planes. This might look as a small piece to the perps, but is in fact hard evidence...
more
074August 1 year ago
074August 1 year ago
The reason you can't see it on the second shot is because the camera was too far away when United 175 hit; they zoomed in when the hijacked 767 already hit its target. And by the way, there is more than enough evidence to prove your bullshit to be what it is (REAL bullshit): photography, footage, witnesses from all around the world (many saw it live on TV) and the parents who now don't get to see their children, isn't that a fucking coincidence?
jmfriedman123 1 year ago
@jmfriedman123 witness' from around the world LOL, What dont people understand LIVE TV can be manipulated!! Before 9/11 and after 9/11. So please leave out the bs line of witness' around the world.
WTF are you talking about w/ your last line, what I am saying or what this video is about has nothing to do w/ saying people didnt die.
The couple said themselves, not thru a camera,said it wasnt a plane. Dont discredit these witness' when you are giving credit to people in China for seeing a plane.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@JusticePetitioner Regardless, the person who filmed it was too far away to make any accurate statements, but I can understand why they'd maybe assume that it was a rocket. And by the way, my friend's cousin was on board that plane. His name was Brian Sweeney, who'd talk to his dad on an airphone until the plane went in.
jmfriedman123 1 year ago
@jmfriedman123 Ahh knew it was only a matter of time before you "knew' someone on the planes. Guess what so didn't I and I know they haven't come home. If you want to believe your friends cousins plane flew into the towers more power to you, its just to bad that you are robbing him of justice and real answers to his death.
Im sure if the couple in the video saw a plane they wouldnt be to far away. Also
Google David Handschuh and then tell me he was too far away for what he saw.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
@JusticePetitioner ok wat the fuck is wrong with u. thousands of people died on that day, my dad knew about 10 of them. 2 of them were on the actual plane. m dad was also going to be on that plane so shut the FUCK UP ABOUT UR STUPID FUCKING GAY ASS CONSPIRACYT THEORY U FUCKER!!
TheBritishElf 1 year ago
@TheBritishElf blah blah blah stfu. Stop playing on emotions and you might actually see whats going on. Everyone knows someone who knew someone who was supposed to be on the planes. I also knew people on the planes so again stfu.
JusticePetitioner 1 year ago
I am converting....i am getting convinced that 9/11 was a inside job. there are too many things difficult ot beileve
msiddiqui135 1 year ago
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT!?
anonymouswillnotstop 1 year ago
1:22-1:37
is the time it took for the concussion to reach that couple
and it was strong too!
wow good evidence
mikeoxhuge 2 years ago
To the stupid people who continue to post comments w/out watching the WHOLE video you will see this isnt about "no planes" hitting the tower. Its about them not being commercial Boeing 767's & the edits in tape.
If people want to believe they didnt catch these things fine, but you cant disregard "Bri" saying it was a military plane. Or the other "witness" who said it wasnt a plane or the guy saying it was a rocket.
People will defend this tape until we get to where she says its a military plane.
JusticePetitioner 2 years ago
there's no helicopter or birds in this video?
aifammafiaaifam 2 years ago
This video is bullshit. You look like a dumbass. I know people who actually saw the second plane hit.
bezorr 2 years ago
Ich hasse die amis aroganten schweine das haben die verdient von mir aus hätten da 1000 flugzeuge rein fliegen könn ^^
tollerossi 2 years ago
This is the most pathetic video ever. Don't watch this crap. JusticePetitioner, you need to get the heck out of our USA and go wherever, just leave our country for posting such crap.
ahfaxthis 2 years ago
the second plane was not edited out , who knew that it would happen a second time. Camera person just stopped video. dumbasses, the video from thousands of others show a plane hit the second tower. Stop your stupid comments and go educate yourselves. Morons.
ahfaxthis 2 years ago
;you people who post conspiracy issues are idiots. there is more than enough video to verify all the facts. cut the crap you morons.
ahfaxthis 2 years ago
no planes used on 9/11 only the white plane where all the operation was carried out from
smoketweed09 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a load of shit!
xKKKKAT 2 years ago
EVERYONE CHECK THE FULL VIDEO YOURSELF BEFORE YOU COME TO CONCLUSION: BOB & BRI FOOTAGE, type in Bob & Bri & will pop up, its 26mins long. If she is part of the conspiracie WHY have they also realised the footage showing flashes & small explosions etc, therefore questioning the official story???!!!
Chrissyb1978 2 years ago
If you watch the video properly the camera swings to the towers from the right which to me says she had the camera pointed away at the moment of impact then swings it round to film the explosion, i do believe about an inside job but you cant think that EVERY piece of film is part of the conspiracie,when she says its "insane" she is talking about the North tower 1st attack b4 the 2nd impact, she isnt talking about the 2nd impact b4 it happens.u no that thats why you left alot of it out.
Chrissyb1978 2 years ago
I was always telling that dogs and cats are mind controlling us. This is a huge conspiracy.
talesdian 2 years ago
GOOD POST!
FNORDPORN 2 years ago
My attention 0:58
right where the plane is supposed to hit
they cut and you hear the continuous sound of a siren
cut and paste???
rickyreypr 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
conspirecy not true stop it with these things
zoneowner865 2 years ago
... the 2nd cople .... they did not live on the east or west side of the towers soo they could not c the 2nd plane
kingofkingsbc 2 years ago
"Mind control" lmao!!!
scuffpuppy 2 years ago
in this video a chopper approches to the WTC # 1......................
w w w . youtube . com/watch?v=DdsSKhZDfRM&feature=related
merged 2 years ago
I think the guys investigating the non-existence of the airplanes say that the guys of this video are nowhere to be found.
merged 2 years ago
if you watch the other video "what bob and bri saw".....look that they DON'T show any helicopter flying by the twin towers , and the mainstream media did show choppers flying by.
merged 3 years ago
Has anyone tried to contact and interview or question BOB and BRI about this very suspicious video that was clearly edited to NOT show the 2nd supposed plane ?
InsideJob4911 3 years ago
everyday there's more people that are findin' out that there were NOT airplanes involved in the murders on 9/11/2001.
and the "truther's leaders" very well KNOW IT too.
why do you think they don't say anything about the "airplanes" in their websites?
merged 3 years ago
If you watch this entire 30 minute vid on google video, at NO time does the video ever skip or jump. There are no clearly visible edits, not one single second at any other time in the entire 30 mins except,
at the very time the 2nd plane would have hit ! for some mysterious unexplained reason, thats the time when the tape skips frames ?
lol gee how ridiculous is that ! How blatantly obvious does this have to get so that people will realize whats goin on ????
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Exactly right! The Feds would never have cut it out unless it showed - or failed to show - something critical. Kind of like what they did to the Zapruder film when they returned it to Abraham Zapruder.
But, I mean these "Bob and Bri" characters are so frickin' phony, too.
"We just SAW it!" (lol)
Who the fuck are they kidding?
People don't say "we just SAW it." They say, "It just now HAPPENED," or, "It just fucking happened NOW!" Or words to that effect.
Such phony pieces of shit!
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
evil
Do we know for a fact that the Feds had this video in their possession before it was publicly released ?
Yes i will admit the woman talking sounds very scripted and phony. also just an observation, she sounds very 'ditzy' and not very bright , classic airhead lol
Is there anyway , or has anyone ever tried to contact these 2 anomynous people BOB and BRI ?
WHO are they and how can we contact them are the essential questions that should be asked
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Evil
Is it possible that perhaps a MILITARY type plane really did strike, and she is correct in what she says
but the FBI edited the film showing the actual plane out ? But the obvious question then would be why would the FBI allow her voice in there claiming it was a Military plane, why not just edit out the image and her voice ?
the Mystery only deepens, did planes hit the WTC, will we ever know for sure hmmm
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Well, they're always playing the Hegelian dialectic game, but setting up there own parameters to allow a certain amount of discussion and "feigned conflict" - but always OUTSIDE the range of the actual truth. That is why we see them leading the 911 truth movement itself ab initio.
911Taboo, however, clearly demonstrates the physical impossibility, according to Newton's 3rd law of motion, that ANY airplane could have glided effortlessly through steel beams as if they were simply made of butter.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
evil
yes i agree the 911 TABOO video really got me to critically think myself through this much better. However, 911 TABOO demonstrated only this concept regarding a Hollow fragile aluminum pssgr Jet.
For Example, whats your Opinion on a Much stronger heavier denser Military BOMBER plane being strong enough to penetrate the bldg like that ?
Obviously the degree of metal strength and durability is night and day between a Military Bomber and an Aluminum pssgr Jet.
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Well, in 1945 a B-25 bomber crashed into the Empire State Building at an estimated speed of 300+ mph. Reading the articles, you'll see that the plane never even came close to completely penetrating the building, which doesn't even have, to my knowledge anyway, close to the amount of exterior steel support columns that the WTC had.
The only parts of that B-25 that penetrated the building were the engines and landing gear. The fuselage and wings fell mostly to the ground or atop other buildings.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Hey i sure wish we had the video of that 1945 Empire bldg B25 crash huh ? lol
I wasnt aware of that. hmmm that is very interesting.
if what you say about that is true, why dont more No planers bring that up ?
seems to me to be a strong piece of evidence to cite.
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
It is a strong piece of evidence.
The strongest and most conclusive evidence is, of course, Newton's laws of motion.
What people do know, however, albeit intuitively (and which I must have known for all the years I was a half-truther myself and in denial about the no planes hypothesis), is what faked videos looks like. Especially badly faked ones like these!
That is why no one has an excuse for believing the BIg Lie. All stand guilty who believe the media and government psychopaths.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
well since the Govt Lied to us about the 1969 Moon Landing Hoax
i suppose its only Logical that 911 is no different
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Well, criminal will, of course, use modus operandi that are proven effective.
While they're both lies, this one is, of course, a much more sinister one.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
yes but ive noticed huge similarities between the Moon Hoax, and the 911 scam. Especially with the Moon Hoax, the moment you begin to dare question its validity
You are bombarded with insults that you are a kook, loon, nut, crazy, and they try to intimidate you with very technical science and very specific Space NASA information.
they attempt to make you feel belittled that ONLY a space scientist can tell if we went to the Moon or not, the avg citizens opinion is worthless
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
But just like 911, when you question these Moon landing believers about very odd strange 'coincidences' they have No answers.
I believe this is a deliberate attempt to silence free expression and the ability to critically and logically think by the common citizen.
Truth is, you no more need to be a Scientist to understand why we Never went to the Moon, as that you Must by necessity, be an Engineer to explain why the Towers collapsed.
Both events are rooted in COMMON SENSE
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago 6
Yeah, definitely. Well, they're degenerate totalitarians masquerading as lovers of democracy.But Socrates wouldn't have even lasted a minute in the USA, though. Guy asked way too many questions, ya' know? lol
Yep, it is all very much common sense. Along with a true open mindedness.
My Italian immigrant grandfather, who was taken out of school in the 2nd grade, said the moon landing was phony as he watched it on TV in '69. I'll never ever forget it. We all thought he was just a "dumb dago."
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago 2
lol i hear ya, turns out your Grandfather had great common sense
we can conclude that BOTH the Moon landing and 911 were devestating psychological 'shock and awe' Operations on the mentality of America for purely Political, social, cultural and of course, economic benefits for a segment of the ELITE of our socitey
Psychologically Paralyze the People
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Yep. Except the latter one is mass murder, while the first was an elaborate hoax.
However, they had kill a few people along the way in the Moon Hoax, too. Gus Grissom was way too good a man for America's Nazi scum. RIP Gus!
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
true, you are correct, 911 was way more intense as far as its maliciousness
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
What's the most convincing evidence to you, so far, of the Moon Hoax?
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
To be honest to me the Moon Hoax is just like 911. In that there is no single solitary 'piece' of evidence that by itself convinces me that a scam has taken place.
So as far as the Moon goes, i cant say there is an AH HA moment where i can focus on 1 item and say HERE is the proof
However, if we take a comprehensive view of the ENTIRE picture of the Moon landing and consider the Science, Engineering, Political, Social and Economics of the event, its a scam
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Yeah, as I was reading some of the comments "people" have posted at your channel, I can see the maliciousness.
You have the option of not allowing comments to be posted to your channel. I don't let people post at mine. If they want to be totalitarian pricks, they can do it at a video comment forum like this one.
So, you see now how the sick mind works. Some of those people are just whores who get paid a fast buck to assist in mass murder.
The devil bastards should be skinned alive. lol
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
i thought about deleting all my negative comments that have been posted on my page, but i decided to leave the evidence up there for all to read.
And what i mean by that is how brainwashed and conventionally progammed people are, how Nasty and childish they sound.
so i decided that the ONLY comments i will remove are those that are unecessarily vulgar or immature with no basis.
But if it shows how Stupid they are, i leave it up there
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
evil, you are right. in both the empire state building and the wtc, the plane never completely penetrated the building except for the engine and landing gear. How similiar they both are in that aspect.
opusbeme 3 years ago
Of course, in the case of the WTC, however, that feat was quite easily accomplished by the LACK of any real airplanes.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Evil, I really dont follow what you are saying.
opusbeme 3 years ago
My reference was only to part (a.) of your statement.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Evil, I just dont follow what your reference means exactly.
opusbeme 3 years ago
Don't sweat it.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Here we go once more, this absurdity just NEVER STOPS !
watch the video here at 1:21, the question i have is obvious , WHY doesnt the guy close up BEFORE the object hits ?
The video lens is set SOOO far away before the 2nd object hits. If that were me filming the 1st tower, and i had a zoom on my camera, i would have, and any reasonable person would have i think , zoomed in IMMEDIATELY to check out what was goin on .
this is all so strange and suspicious
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
the video at 1:21
hes so ridiculously far away that we cant see anything ! OF COURSE typical 911 'coincidence' he just happens to clearly zoom right in AFTER the 2nd object hits. when we cant see what it was that hit.
all the guy had to do was zoom in a little more and we could have seen what that Object was. But as with EVERYTHING ELSE practically with 911, it didnt happen and the mystery keeps chuggin along
FUCK !
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
mY Opinion is the 2nd video at 1:21 is just as fake and Suspicious as bob and bri
the guy is holding the shot at 1:21, WHY ? its so ridiculously far away that you cant see ANYTHING !
why would you not try to zoom in at 1st ? so if the 2nd explosiion never hit, he would have just kept the view at 100 miles away and basically looked at nothing ?
because the initial view he had was TOTALLY useless and was so far away, you might as well not even film it.
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
I'm not sure why he hadn't zoomed in earlier. That's a good point, but their astonishment is real astonishment v. the phony Bob and Bri.
Notice Bri's sarcastic closing comment, "Yeah, they're attacking the world trade center, not us."
#1: The media people are, in real time, now just intensely speculating that it SEEMS to be a terrorist attack, yet she states it so "matter of factly" - a case of BAD scripting.
#2: How does she know SHE won't be hit in a 3rd "plane"/terrorist attack?
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Evil
Yes lol i noticed that also about Bri saying 'they're attack trade center not us' 1st time i heard her say that i was like WHAT ?
such an unatural odd weird thing to say when at the time its happening You cant possibly have any idea what precisely is happening.
Also too the way she said it so casually and calmly ! it was like 'yea whatever' Just doesnt add up. Not to be mean also but she sounds like a 'classic stereotypical Airhead, a real ditz
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Regarding the 2nd couple at 1:21, yea their astonishment sounds real, but thats not enough to really put this whole thing to rest.
Video will trump Audio 10 times out of 10, thats where the real proof is obviously
its really sad when you think of it and so perplexing. That guy was in an EXCELLENT position to capture raw footage exact what hit the Bldg, and ooooooops he just 'happened' by a few seconds to have missed it.
Im noticing an insane pattern here ! lol
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
also too i just realized, the 2nd couple filming, thats a VERY high powered zoom on that camera !!!!
Notice the incredible difference in his zoom. I have a pretty good video camera with a a zoom, and my zoom is NOWHERE near that powerful .
He starts out at what seems to be like 30 Miles away, and then all of sudden ZOOM, hes so close right on top of bldg where you can almost see the finite cracks in the concrete almost lol
whole thing is so suspicious
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
He starts out like 30 miles away? Do you really belive your own bullshit? My sony camcorder has 20 times optical zoom and can definetely do that. The whole this is suspicious because you just dont understand what you are looking at.
opusbeme 3 years ago
Why didnt he zoom in sooner ?
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
evil i have some ?s for you
1. Exactly who are these people named Bob and Bri , has anyone privately or any media tried to contact them or interview them ?
2. Why did they wait 5 full yrs to release this video publicly , and did the FBI , NYPD or other govt agency possess it previous to public release ?
3. Do you know of any Other UNEDITED Amatuer Raw Footage shot that day that does show us what happened at the Towers, ?
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Sorry, man, don't know the details on these two low-life NWO actor-clowns, who were the bad actors in this low-budget phony post-911 government propaganda production.
But if you can dig the phoniness, how about the Michael Hezarckani shot, huh? Now that low-life NWO mass-murder accomplice really takes the fucking cake for his phoniness and shitty acting skills! (lol)
"Oh, my God I cannot believe it..." is SO FUCKING PHONY!
Check out how badly Killtown nails this prick at: /watch?v=X5i07-kHgww
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
OPU
go watch the video here
911 TABOO, its 4 parts, it will explain what evilus is talking about
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
So, to have that kind of complete penetration and explosive power through the 240 exterior steel support column framework (60 on each side) of the WTC towers, it most likely was a some type of missile, although DEWs should not to be excluded either.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
whats a DEW ?
Also im confused on if a Plane , be it Military or American Airlines Jet, actually did crash into WTC
wouldnt thousands of people have heard the extremely LOUD noise overhead of the plane flying on its way into wtc ?
correct me if im wrong, but my understanding is the ' supposed plane' was flying very Low and would have been clearly visible and heard about 3 miles away leading up to hitting WTC.
so then where are all these witnesses at ?
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
DEW = Directed Energy Weapons; a favorite topic of Nico Haupt (the guy who ALMOST got as loud as Alex Jones a couple times and never heard the end of it.)
Yep, excellent point! Not only does it seem no reliable witnesses heard the 2nd "airplane" coming in that low (which every person watching that burning tower would have seen and heard a "2nd" time), most of the faked videos didn't even bother to add the sound of the "airplane." That's how piss-fucking poor these fake videos are! (lol)
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
in other words, while i Definitely have totally ruled out the Plane being an American Airlines jet as clearly the videos show a very dark grey almost black plane with No windows, so i ruled that out
But could there have been a real plane hitting WTC but they were heavy duty Reinforced Military bomber planes ?
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Well, there could be no airplane reinforced that much to completely penetrate steel beams. If so, it would never get off the ground.
Also watch all the clips of the non-faked witnesses to the explosion. They never mention an airplane. If a military plane had actually been there, then the legitimate witnesses would have seen that kind, also.
They had to make it look like the whole thing wasn't so scripted, hence the predesignated early "confusion" over what actually hit the WTC.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
Watch September Clues, also, in addition to 911Taboo. I gad to watch both docs a few times before it all made sense.
There ARE actually two clips with NO plane in them. In the one, they later inserted a little "ball," not really big enough to be an airplane. In the other one, (I'm not actually sure if it's actually in September Clues), there seems to be nothing at all.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
If you want one of the best forums to go to - where you'll find Genghis 6199 and other cutting-edge "no planers" - go to DJShure's "pumpitout-dot-com."
I'm sure you'll find a lot of great info there and hopefully the best answers available to any questions you have from whole-truthers, as opposed to half-truthers.
All the best to you!
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 3 years ago
evil
thanks for the forum links, i appreciate that ! ill have to check those out sounds great man
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
My grade 12 media class studied the TV fakery involved in 9/11. I think it is quite obvious that the government used its control over the mainstream media to air faked planes in order to support the military's plans for wars in the Middle East. Watch SEPTEMBER CLUES, 911 TABOO, etc.
hankwheels 3 years ago 13
Lay off the crystal meth!
Wez666 3 years ago
Great vid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
foxxx2001 3 years ago
all the "witnesses" that were interviewed on tv. that day belonged to the mainstream media.
check the links that I posted below.
merged 3 years ago