Do the research. And watch for yourself how each and every one of our liberties will be taken away as a result of the Patriot Act and the new NDAA S Bill 1867. Before Adolf Hitler became the leader in Germany, Germany was Democratic society. Slowly laws were created to take away freedoms and as a result Germany became a police state. The German people put their trust in their leaders when should have been Patriots and questioned their decisions.
@stjohnsmanor Fear is used to control. If the government can make people believe they caused 9/11 that will make people fear them. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA operation designed to make people fear the government.
Don't believe everything the government tells you. Don't swallow the 9/11 Truth Movement lies. Question it or be a sheep.
@pantspoopie Go on line and check out the Patriot Act and see just how many constitutional rights have been taken away as a result of 9/11. The Patriot Act is our government responding to 9/11 making us believe we are not safe with out these new laws.
All of the experts are contracted by the U.S. government. The so called experts who work for a magazine are not experts. As a result of 9/11 we now have the Patriot Act that has taken away more civil liberties from Americans then anything in U.S. history. But look through history if you dare. You will find out that this has happened before.
@stjohnsmanor It's been proven that all the 9/11 Truth people are contracted by the CIA. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a government operation to cover the fact that the government failed to protect the people on 9/11. Facts:
1. Every single 9/11 Truth show, speaker, website, book, etc lists the EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. The same message on EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE EXACT SAME TIME shows CIA propaganda skills.
Question the 9/11 Truth Movement. Don't believe CIA lies!
Why does he refer to getting the firemen out as "pull IT"? Not pull THEM out, or get the firemen out? Plus, I agree, there were no firemen even in there!
@toosousand pull it maybe pull the plan of trying to save Building 7, please dont by into these absoulut bull shit stories theorists have come forward with. Every major event has a conspiracy behind it, conspirators just want to be the hero who found the flaw and changed the history when in reality there is nothing not a damn thing to change!!
Someone should tell Brett Blanchard to look at WTC and WTC7 dust samples under a microscope. Maybe then he might find evidence of a controlled demolition (i.e. The super thermite residue discovered by former BYU physics professor Steve Jones).
you think 8 hours of burning can destroy a whole building thats not enough this is crazy i have seen building burning a whole day and it did not collapse, shame on history channel
@arkkhin Shame on you for being a moron the build was damaged by debris falling and fires burning all day. Also just because 1 building falls doesn't mean other building should too. Building are built differently at different times through out years. For example a building built in1930 probably will not be as strong as 1 built in 1970
@arkkhin It's been PROVEN the 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to stop 9/11 due to incompetence and the CIA helped start, fund and continue the 9/11 Truth movement to help cover up the fact they failed to protect the American people AND to sow fear among those that distrust it.
You are a CIA operative sent to silence the PEOPLES voices and we will not swallow your lies!
@pantspoopie and your just a dumbass who wants to be a hero who uncovers the real truth of 9/11 get over your self and realize 19 bastards took 4 planes and used them as missiles! Why, to attack AMERICA!!! Thats it!!!
these videos are making me sick to my stomach! these "debunkers" seem to care more about making fun of conspiracy theorists. Such a coincidence that all the buildings collapsed stratight down.
ALERT !! GO Type AE911TRUTH & listen to thousands of EXPERT structural engineers,architects ,chemical engineers,demolition experts,scientists ect.... They speak of FACTS /EVIDENCE !! The 911report IS theory not science , fact or evidence. There is no evidence/science to back NIST/Gov report. AE911 Experts use evidence/science NOT theory like the NIST/911 report did. FACT !!
@Headshothorror4488 AETruth911 has no facts. They only have a series of bullshit lies and manipulated statements and videos in a sad attempt at pushing their own agenda. AE911Truth are not "experts" they are a group of lying assholes that have no fucking idea what they are talking about. Just quoting AETruth shows how ignorant someone is. Truthers are fucking retarded idiots. FACT!!
just so you people know the steel doesnt have to melt in order to fail the heat from the jet fuel was more then enough for the steel to soften and the building loose its support
The airlines should have something where it can't be turned off by hijackers. Have it where there's something they think they turned it off but still on so they can track it.
Just because the History Channel makes a show about this doesn't mean it isn't worth investigating. All I have seen so far is a bunch of "Experts" vs "Conspiracy Theorist". Labeling anyone who questions something as "Conspiracy Theorist" or "truthers" allows others to easily dismiss them. Google "experts investigating 9/11" and you will find countless experts who agree something is wrong. Now here is the problem, can you call the experts conspiracy theorist? TV is not an answer ;)
Tell me Truth Nutters...what happened to the passengers of 93 and 77? Of ALL of the witnesses who contradict your alleged evidence, who did they get paid off by??? The family and friends who spoke to the victims on air phones, who's paying them off to lie...Since you people are so convinced of yourself, this Sept.11, confront any of the family members who had loved ones on 93 or 77, tell them your account of what "really" happened..I'm sure they need the real truth from you..good luck with that
@mherrenschmidt - It is in this film. They believe that government agents used machines making them sound like the loved ones of these families. See obvious when you think about it. Magic boxes, operated by agents with such detailed knowledge of every family it borders on psychic. They talked for up to 20 minutes without one family suspecting anything and even left taped messages they were so confident. But the Conspiracy Theorists can hear them once and just know they are all fake.
He is pretty calm for just seeing people die. not to mention the crispy hat and tee-shirt. Not a wrinkle or stain or speck of dirt on him. Who is this guy? An actor or what? questions, questions, questions and no answers...hmm, what are they hiding?
He is pretty calm for just seeing people die. not to mention the crispy hat and tee-shirt. Not a wrinkle or stain or speck of dirt on him. Who is this guy? An actor or what? questions, questions, questions and no answers...hmm, what are they hiding?"
A biker without a wrinkle, stain or speck of dirt on him? He was no biker!
what nobody looks at is the first world Trade center bombing. 9 basement floors were penetrated that are 29 foot thick of concrete. The official story is that a gas and oil bomb did that? Really? thats not even looking at 911. And look jet fuel burns at 1500 degrees structural steel melts at 2800-3500 degrees and is also coated with a fire proof coating, just talk to a Structural Engineer its not possible. Only in La la land, but even there not gonna happen. turn off your tv, wake up loiuses
That makes no sense about WTC7. It implies that any of us could be building demolition experts as you just blow a few supports. Buildings topple over so why didn't this, just doesn't add up in the way it came down from the ground up too. Why wouldn't you say pull OUT and not pull IT? Makes me laugh how people on here question the intelectual capacity of others becasue they don't agree with each other. Is all odd but where are all the people who rigged it, you can't keep them quiet for ever.
Has there ever been a study on the correlation between belief in conspiracy theories and intelligence level? I'd bet money a lot of the people leaving comments here have GEDs.
so let me guess this straight a fuckin 25 year old research editor is considered A EXPERT RESPONSE??? THIS VIDEO IS A FUCKIN JOKE THOSE DUMBASSES WORKING FOR A MAGAZINE ARE NOT EVEN CREDIBLE!!!!!!
so let me guess this straight a fuckin 25 year old research editor is considered A EXPERT RESPONSE??? THIS VIDEO IS A FUCKIN JOKE THOSE DUMBASSES WORKING FOR A MAGAZINE ARE NOT EVEN CREDIBLE!!!!!!
@ttimothymurphy - Because the computer that rendered this CGI (Computer Generated Images) was operated by incompetent people. Don't you understand that this is TV Fakery? It is not real. Remember the movie Independence Day from 1996? Same shit, made by less competent people.
PS if i was involved in covering this up , you can bet i could convince you i believed what i was saying too. Great lying skills dont equal truth.and thats all i have to add
This same dismissing attitude is used to redicule UFO witnesses as well.And with hundreds of thousands of average joes and photos and smoking gun videos they still claim they dont know whats going on.Another theory is that 911 was a mini project blue beam and utilised advance satelite holigraphic tech. if this was indeed the case it would explain alot.Many researcher also feel chemtrail jets are unmanned and use this same tech.Nothing would shock me anymore
so called experts are all defending with flimsy answers, but not one of them supports a deep investigation with amnesty for underling whistle blowers. if they are so sure why are they so afraid ?why not end these conspiricys once and for all by letting a real independent large scale big budget investigation to clear this up?the answer is obvious to me.
damn, whos that dumbass 20 yr old kid talking on this subject? i wanna fuckin punch that kid right in the throat. he doesnt know shit hes just talking shit.
bastard bush saw impeding attack and the opportunity of personal gain and siezed the moment and allowed thousands to die and let 1000s die and fucked the country over
what i hate about this documentary is that they just shoot down the facts, have some guy sit infront of a camera and say "theorists are wrong" honestly why not take a scientific approach and show why things like a controlled demolition wasnt what happened at wtc 1 and 2/the pentagon bomb theory through science? mythbusters does it all the time, they are more than capable of doing the tests, personally i dont think it was a controlled demo i think the
6:26 "This is what buildings look like when they fall down." When do 40+ story buildings fall down from fire damage? Buildings catch on fire all the time and don't fall down. Look up the Windsor building. Debunkers claim that conspiracy "theorists" don't have any evidence. This is a lie. Rather than looking to the controlled media to tell you what to think, why don't people think for themselves? The media is owned by a handful of gigantic corporations w/ agendas GE, Viacom, Disney and the like
My job in US Air Force was sabotaging US Govt buildings, sabotaging US military aircraft, sabotaging US nukes by detonation of nuclear bombs on US military bases using conventional C4 explosive in controlled demolitions. 1,000s of US soldiers have this job every day. One reason why I'm on History Channel. PirateNews * org / flight93 * html - Read Operation Northwoods - that's an order!
YEAH I knew this document, that's one the evidence that made me start looking for alternatives and finally learn about the conspiracy theory (or at least some small part)
At first it's unbelievable, but after several weeks you just realize that it's logical and that it couldn't not be otherwise since people are so dependent on the system to work properly.
Story repeats itself and people are just too brainwashed to find the truth yet, maybe the next generation (Internet children).
For those still in denial about the fact that we ran war games prior to 9/11 simulating terrorists hijacking airplanes and using them as flying bombs see: watch?v=bdn0AOC76s4#t=0m50s
Let's see. In the first few seconds of this film the "expert" claims that NORAD is only geared toward external threats. Did he ever hear about operation Vigilant Guardian? It was an exercise NORAD was running ON 9/11 which simulated defending the country against hijacked aircraft WITHIN US AIRSPACE being used as flying bombs. The "experts" chose to leave this fact out. Why?
Or maybe they're just Egyptian because they live in "deNile". There are clearly facts that don't support the official story that need to be looked into instead of glossed over.
Unfortunately most of these "facts" are plain falsification of the mainstream story by conspiracy nuts. Like their claim that the fire couldn't have melted the steel so it couldn't have been the cause of the collapse - nobody ever talked about molten steel. The steel was WEAKENED by the fires, which was enough for it to succumb under the weight it had to bear. Or your claim that Vigilant Guardian was about hijackings within the USA - it really postulated attacks from Russia. So tasteless.
According to the NIST report 'weakened steel" had nothing to do with the collapses. But I wouldn't expect you to know that. You don't even know what your own official story is saying. The NIST report claims "thermal expansion" which is quite different from "weakened steel".
first of all im not FOR nor against the conspiracy i honesty am not that interested. what im dissatisfied with the fact that they dont provide any concrete evidence to their so called facts. i dont think that 911 was a controlled demolition i do think that Bush knew it was coming and used it as an opportunity to scare the american ppl to his will. if your gonna debunk something do it right dont just tell people theyre wrong and simply dismiss them as radical idiots
All this video shows is that specialists disagree. That's all. And that's a real big problem.
WE want facts not opinions. We want a real controlled inquiry and made in parallel by several institutions to make sure that they tell the same thing! It's such a big event, it should not be left as a controversial subject. We are not speaking about UFOs we are speaking about people who died and a war in Iraq.
It doesn't matter how much 9/11 is explained, there will always be people who disagree and would rather believe in an "alternate version". People like this will never think differently no matter how much someone shows them they're wrong. So why should we pay them any attention?
Because some very skilled scientists showed that the NIST report has been faked and that several proof have been ignored. The standard fire inquiry protocol has not been followed. There are explosive traces in the remains, and no one explained it but simply ignored it.
There are two great videos made a chef scientist very well known (and I checked his background to be sure, and you can to)
These videos show that NIST has made many mistakes and he makes a lot of good points in that respect however, he also uses straw-man arguments and false claims to push his idea that buildings were destroyed in a controlled demolition. That's not something you sholuld do if expect to be taken seriously.
He talks about the Winsor Madrid fire, but fails to mention that the Winsor was supported by conrete columns which were not present in the WTC.
2nd video can only record surface temperatures, not the core temperature so the fires WERE hot enough to weaken the steel. The "explosive traces" were ignored because the scientist who know better know it's nonsense.
Google: "final word on niels harrit"
He claims that Bush's Brother was in charge of WTC Security, that tower 1 fell at free-fall speed and early reports of WTC7 collapse is proof of foreknowledge.
OK. Everyone can make a mistake from time to time.
But the real problem in this story is that the fire inquiry protocols have been ignored, several proof have been ignored.
I think that scientist tried honestly to find the truth, but the truth was so harsh that there brain could not accept it, that's how unconsciously they went on the wrong trail, and from there the proof they couldn't explain were ignored.
I think that we have made an honest mistake about 9-11 and it will cost us.
I have already seen those videos. AlienScientist isn't just making mistakes, he's spreading claims that have been disproven years ago.
To be honest, Im not sure how much of a grip on reality AlienScientist has. He believes that the government is conspiring to "enslave mankind" and start a "New World Order", and he list "making contact with aliens" as one of his hobbies.
And again, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that the conspiracy is true... I'm saying that I'm suspicious, and because I saw the proofs, I know that It's far from being impossible.
So, if it's not impossible, why people don't want to hear about it? Why do people believe that corruption doesn't exist? Why do people underestimate the power of corruption.
After all, scientists and Leaders are normal humans, they lie 4 money. It's human nature.
And that's why I believe that it's the scientists duty to show us that it's far from being impossible. Not in order to start chaos or mass fear, but in order to show people that they need to remain open to the possibility, and to take care of this.
People are too proud (not stupid, but proud) to admit that it's possible.
The conspiracy theory is a great story, showing us how it could be possible and how we would not be able to see it.
There's a great moral and a great lesson to learn.
@Springwoodfinest did u read the new foxnews article???? they admitted to bringing down building 7 and it takes weeks to do that.....what now idiots?????? wake up!!!!!!
@Springwoodfinest at 8:16 said silverstein meant pull out firefighters right....now google "building 7 foxnews" u will be amazed, u were all wrong the whole damn time!!!!!!
@Springwoodfinest scare american people. the people were already scared. what were u gonna shoot down, "your own commercial plane with innocent people". really. the conspiracy thoerists are a bunch of ignorant non factual idiots.
Obviously you do. But you'd rather not think at all. If you did you would look up in time to look up in information about the wargames. It's easier to name call then to actually engage in intelligent debate isn't it?
Don't forget long time ago, back when Nixon was president, there was a pilot that was getting let go by the Air Force. Well he did not like that so he got drunk and stole a helicopter.
He LANDED that helicopter on the White House. So just remember the most secured building in the world can still be infiltrated by a flying device.
It was about planes coming from the area of the former USSR. Not about planes hijacked inside the country. You stupid turds constantly come up with so called incongruities in the mainstream story that you make yourself look like fools. Just take all the thousands of objections you have raised against the story and decide for yourself how likely it is for all of them to be true. It's just brain shit by wannabe thought criminals desperately trying to show everyone how critical they are. Fucktards.
You talked about operation Vigilant Guardian and that operation was about bombers coming from the former Soviet Union. It's in the 9/11 Commission Report. It's not my fault you call things names they don't have, you fucking retard.
Here's the deal moron. There were multiple parts to the same exercise. One part was indeed Russian bombers. The other part WAS HIJACKED AIRPLANES USED AS FLYING BOMBS! This was reported in Vanity Fair by someone WHO LISTENED TO THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS of tapes of the exercise! Google Vanity Fair NORAD tapes. This was also reported in Aviation Week as part of VIGILANT GUARDIAN! So what if the 9/11 commission left this out? Commissioner Bob Graham admitted the report was censored.
wow this is just a bunch of biased bullshit, they are mad at the conspiracy theorists for not giving "facts" yet they do not show any of their own. i dont want a vague explanation of what happened i wanna see controlled experiments reliving those exact conditions. then i will be convinced. until such things happen. i will remain skeptical of the "official" story
I just love how people like you whine about the debunkers not providing you with satisfying facts while not raising any concrete objections of your own. Derision ("biased bullshit") is the classical argument of people who don't have anything to say but don't want to admit that. Just try to discredit your opponent and hope that this way you can eschew providing your own arguments.
Google USAToday 9/11 wargames. I can't post links because Youtube sucks (just like you) but you can read the following.
===================
WASHINGTON — In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.
===================
Note there were multiple wargames going on at the same time.
I bet you were one of the 70% of Americans that bought into the conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11. Even some of the 9/11 commission members have said there are problems with the final report. Two wrote a book saying they were lied to by the Pentagon and NORAD. Bob Graham gave a speech where he said information about U.S. allies being involved in the attack was censored. But hey, just hate on those trying to find the truth.
these people ever stop to think for even ONE-mother-fucking-second that "oh wait, we're just about to perpertrate these evil deeds to further our cause in this material world, but.... BUT, what if we have to go through something like Hostel or Saw in hell as a direct result of these misdeeds?? What about THAT? If hell DOES turn out to be true, and we DO end-up there, will I even be able to endure all that shit?? Will it all be abit too much for me?? Fuck, I had better stop this evil right NOW."
My point? Have these evil governmental "inside job" motherfuckers who perpertrated 9/11 (majorly hardcore evil cunts like Cheney for example) never given even 1 second's thought to the fact that there might be a very feasible possibility of having to go to hell and endure an eternity of EXTREEEEEEME torture for what they have done? Same goes for ANYBODY who does evil during their life, be it Adolf Hitler, Kenneth Lay, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson or even the everyday common petty thief. Did none of
Who's seen the film Saw (in fact, all 5 of them, most particularly the 3rd)? Who's seen Hostel parts I and II? You ever imagined hell (oh yes bwoy, believe me, it fuckin' DOES exist even if Heaven doesn't.... how else would evil people be punished after death for their malevolant deeds during their lifetime??) to be like thse films? I reckon that's EXACTLY what hell is gonna be (and IS) like. Unimaginable extremes of physical and psychological torment when you're all fuckin' tied-up and gagged!
Continued from 5... Both of these factors may have made the building more likely to collapse, but what Mr. Megs doesn't say is that these things made it more likely to tip over, not to fall into its own footprint.
5. Again, Jim Megs is trying to imply that building 7 was more likely to collapse because of its structure. Yes, the was hollower at the bottom. Yes, the building did have truses holding it up. And yes, this may have made it more likely to collapse. What he doesn't mention is that the truses made the building very asymetrical. His comment also about a large section of the building being scooped out from the bottom refers to the 25% scooped out theory(recently discredited).
4. They tried to say there was no evidence of demolition in the debris pile of building 7. This is not true. Not once in this entire documentary does any so called "expert" mention the huge pools of molten metal found in the debris piles of all 3 buildings. That is a great indicater of something other than normal fires in the building.
3. Larry Silverstein's comment I admit is one of the more unconvincing theories about building 7. I don't know if he was actually talking about blowing up the building. All I will say on the matter is that both the FEMA and NIST reports stated that there were no firefighting efforts being done in WTC 7. So either Silverstein lied or both FEMA and NIST lied.
2. Jim Megs is trying to imply that Building 7 collapsed the same way that all damaged buildings fall, into their own footprint. However, if you go on the internet you'll see hundreds of videos of buildings collapsing outside of controlled demolition and they all end up tipping over. They don't fall sraight down through the path of greatest resistance. So as far as Jim Meg's comment is concerned, it just a flat out lie.
1. It may seem crazy to destroy a building to destroy lots of information, but not from a financial point of view. Silverstien had that building insured for over 800 million dollars and it costed him about 300 million to rebuild. He essentially made 500 million dollars off the buildings collapse. So, at least to the people who owned WTC 7, the building's destruction was not a financial loss.
5:10 "if you can't prove exactly how these building fell then it had to get blown up"---No the people I listen and talk to say that there is something wrong and we need an explanation, not that this definitively proves that it got blown up. Very neatly placed wording I'd say---I'm sorry I'll keep on trying with the actual article that Popular mechanics put out and anything else that I can find but as for how they try and make sense of WTC7 in this , I am just not seeing it there way
4:00 the speak of buildings 5 and 6 and note that the conspirators don't mention this. I would have to say that is because the did not fall into themselves. I am not trying to start a whirl wind of hatred towards me rather I am just trying to show how easily it can go back on them.
The "experts" don't add any factual evidence either in this entire documentary. They just basically say "Nuh, that's just dumb what they say. Those conspiracy guys".
"Mr.President, the paper shredders are out of order. Should we destroy the entire building?" Yeah that makes sense. Conspiracy nutjobs will come up with anything to prove something that simply isn't there.
Ironically America'sFan, your not far from the truth. The world Trade Centre had run out of pencil sharpeners - it cost the US taxpayer 3 billion a month to keep supplying those buildings with the neccesary pencil sharpeners, there had to be some way of solving this problem.
Do you know where the worlds biggest supply of pencil sharpeners is?????
@00000Dean00000 i heard that osama has a penchil sharpener fetish. he wouldnt give the US any pencil sharpeners. What would you do if someone didnt give you a pencil sharpener at a reasonable price? of course you would go to war with them !
@00000Dean00000 Are you just being ironic or are you actually implying that the American government orchastrated 9/11 because they were running out of pencil sharpeners?
popular mechanics didn't explain at all about the passenger calling his mom and stating his full name. also why the hell did Cheney take so long in getting an order to shoot down planes at 10:30? you'd think he do it sometime right after the NYC trade center attacks.
I think the free fall so called 'controlled demolition' is by far the funniest wannabe evidence that conspiraters love to point out. How do you expect to see a building fall? side ways to the right with not too much noise? Is that a proper way for a 500 ft building to fall? Fuckin retarded. They just say shit and have no training in demolitions. LMFAO! PULL IT? THATS WHAT SHE SAID. XD
I'm not saying the collapse wasn't real-just the government's explanation on WHY it fell.
Also, it doesn't just not make sense to me-there's a whole movement that questions bldg 7's collapse and are demanding a re-investigation.
Before you comment, however, please consider that the 9/11 Commission report said nothing about the collapse or the witnesses that were inside it before it fell and their accounts of EXPLOSIONS. Consider Barry Jennings' account, for example.
just because it doesnt make sense to you does absolutely zero to prove it false.
youre just going to have to get over it. Its possible things are really "no-shit" true even if you cant understand them.
7 was not in the 911cr for the same reasons any of the other damaged and destroyed buildings were--it was a report on the terrorist attack. Not a "list list all the damage to every building that day" report.
It sounds like, to you, the fall of building 7as a result of 'collateral damage' from a terrorist attack means that it's a non issue. Please keep in mind that 7 housed the Office of Emergency Management, branch offices of the secret service, the CIA, the Department of Defense, the Securities and Exchange Commission and a lot more.
I guess it comes down to whether you believe the 911 commission report.
The next time you think that the 911 CR couldn't be a cover-up or a whitewash, consider who the Bush Admin was going to appoint, originally, to head the commission:
Henry Kissinger, the King of Cover-up.
Also, don't you find it strange that there were 12 times the usual confirmed put options on American Airlines and United Airlines stock up to 5 days prior to 9/11?
Snopes will claim FALSE to that, since the 9/11 CR is considered credible by them but even they confirm the put options.
But what constitutes as proof in this situation? Does Barry Jenning's videotaped account of explosions going off at the bottom of wtc 7 count as proof? Or does William Rodriguez's accounts of explosions prior to the plane crashes into the twins count as proof as well?
According to skeptics/experts, no-they don't. The CR served the administration more than it did anyone else since "[their] aim has not been to assign individual blame".
"But what constitutes as proof in this situation?"
Actual evidence. Given the size of the 3 towers, there should be thousands and thousands of miles of det cord left. debris such as caps, shock tubing would litter the area. Yet not ONE smallest shred was found.
Real demolitions look and sound like these.
watch?v=eRZPPdf_sm0&feature=related
watch?v=eUIdf4UJ3_4&feature=related
watch?v=ZlGmnKvOhlg&feature=related
Nothing like that recorded on 911. Despite hundreds of cameras.
This video was not done well at all. I have watched a lot of History Channel videos and this was bad.
stjohnsmanor 1 month ago
Do the research. And watch for yourself how each and every one of our liberties will be taken away as a result of the Patriot Act and the new NDAA S Bill 1867. Before Adolf Hitler became the leader in Germany, Germany was Democratic society. Slowly laws were created to take away freedoms and as a result Germany became a police state. The German people put their trust in their leaders when should have been Patriots and questioned their decisions.
stjohnsmanor 1 month ago
@stjohnsmanor Fear is used to control. If the government can make people believe they caused 9/11 that will make people fear them. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA operation designed to make people fear the government.
Don't believe everything the government tells you. Don't swallow the 9/11 Truth Movement lies. Question it or be a sheep.
pantspoopie 1 month ago
@pantspoopie Go on line and check out the Patriot Act and see just how many constitutional rights have been taken away as a result of 9/11. The Patriot Act is our government responding to 9/11 making us believe we are not safe with out these new laws.
stjohnsmanor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All of the experts are contracted by the U.S. government. The so called experts who work for a magazine are not experts. As a result of 9/11 we now have the Patriot Act that has taken away more civil liberties from Americans then anything in U.S. history. But look through history if you dare. You will find out that this has happened before.
stjohnsmanor 1 month ago
@stjohnsmanor It's been proven that all the 9/11 Truth people are contracted by the CIA. The 9/11 Truth Movement is a government operation to cover the fact that the government failed to protect the people on 9/11. Facts:
1. Every single 9/11 Truth show, speaker, website, book, etc lists the EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. The same message on EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE EXACT SAME TIME shows CIA propaganda skills.
Question the 9/11 Truth Movement. Don't believe CIA lies!
pantspoopie 1 month ago
this is the biggest bunch of crap i have ever seen
dirtynate100 1 month ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
this is the biggest bunch of crap i have ever seen
dirtynate100 1 month ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
Why does he refer to getting the firemen out as "pull IT"? Not pull THEM out, or get the firemen out? Plus, I agree, there were no firemen even in there!
toosousand 1 month ago
@toosousand pull it maybe pull the plan of trying to save Building 7, please dont by into these absoulut bull shit stories theorists have come forward with. Every major event has a conspiracy behind it, conspirators just want to be the hero who found the flaw and changed the history when in reality there is nothing not a damn thing to change!!
pocomedy 1 month ago
Oh yeah he wanted to pull the firemen out of the building when there were none in the building
searchgoeson 3 months ago
Someone should tell Brett Blanchard to look at WTC and WTC7 dust samples under a microscope. Maybe then he might find evidence of a controlled demolition (i.e. The super thermite residue discovered by former BYU physics professor Steve Jones).
fanof2012 4 months ago
Christianity. Islam. Capitalism. Buddhism. Socialism. Democracy. Capitalism. Judaism. Communism. Hinduism.
We need another great idea, soon.
JenryBeja 4 months ago
you think 8 hours of burning can destroy a whole building thats not enough this is crazy i have seen building burning a whole day and it did not collapse, shame on history channel
arkkhin 5 months ago
@arkkhin Shame on you for being a moron the build was damaged by debris falling and fires burning all day. Also just because 1 building falls doesn't mean other building should too. Building are built differently at different times through out years. For example a building built in1930 probably will not be as strong as 1 built in 1970
ChrisHill991 4 months ago
@arkkhin It's been PROVEN the 9/11 Truth movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to stop 9/11 due to incompetence and the CIA helped start, fund and continue the 9/11 Truth movement to help cover up the fact they failed to protect the American people AND to sow fear among those that distrust it.
You are a CIA operative sent to silence the PEOPLES voices and we will not swallow your lies!
pantspoopie 1 month ago
@pantspoopie and your just a dumbass who wants to be a hero who uncovers the real truth of 9/11 get over your self and realize 19 bastards took 4 planes and used them as missiles! Why, to attack AMERICA!!! Thats it!!!
pocomedy 1 month ago
BS documentary shit
arkkhin 5 months ago
i think this is bullshit documentary
arkkhin 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 5 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
these videos are making me sick to my stomach! these "debunkers" seem to care more about making fun of conspiracy theorists. Such a coincidence that all the buildings collapsed stratight down.
jchavez11487 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALERT !! GO Type AE911TRUTH & listen to thousands of EXPERT structural engineers,architects ,chemical engineers,demolition experts,scientists ect.... They speak of FACTS /EVIDENCE !! The 911report IS theory not science , fact or evidence. There is no evidence/science to back NIST/Gov report. AE911 Experts use evidence/science NOT theory like the NIST/911 report did. FACT !!
Headshothorror4488 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Headshothorror4488 AETruth911 has no facts. They only have a series of bullshit lies and manipulated statements and videos in a sad attempt at pushing their own agenda. AE911Truth are not "experts" they are a group of lying assholes that have no fucking idea what they are talking about. Just quoting AETruth shows how ignorant someone is. Truthers are fucking retarded idiots. FACT!!
12weasel100 7 months ago
These arent really convincing explanations, its more so "...Expert response: Yeah fuck those guys!"...."Conspiracy Theory..."
wprovo 9 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths 2
@wprovo this opinion of yours is so inaccurately childish.
rahkshi0k 7 months ago
@rahkshi0k Take a shit you joke.
wprovo 7 months ago
@wprovo wait do you mean "take a JOKE you SH*T"? or the way you wrote it
i think the first one makes more sense.
rahkshi0k 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rahkshi0k with all do respect, I don't give a flying fuck what you think, now kindly fuck off.
wprovo 6 months ago
just so you people know the steel doesnt have to melt in order to fail the heat from the jet fuel was more then enough for the steel to soften and the building loose its support
melgibsonsballs 9 months ago
The airlines should have something where it can't be turned off by hijackers. Have it where there's something they think they turned it off but still on so they can track it.
scottieman2 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just because the History Channel makes a show about this doesn't mean it isn't worth investigating. All I have seen so far is a bunch of "Experts" vs "Conspiracy Theorist". Labeling anyone who questions something as "Conspiracy Theorist" or "truthers" allows others to easily dismiss them. Google "experts investigating 9/11" and you will find countless experts who agree something is wrong. Now here is the problem, can you call the experts conspiracy theorist? TV is not an answer ;)
anthe 10 months ago
Tell me Truth Nutters...what happened to the passengers of 93 and 77? Of ALL of the witnesses who contradict your alleged evidence, who did they get paid off by??? The family and friends who spoke to the victims on air phones, who's paying them off to lie...Since you people are so convinced of yourself, this Sept.11, confront any of the family members who had loved ones on 93 or 77, tell them your account of what "really" happened..I'm sure they need the real truth from you..good luck with that
mherrenschmidt 10 months ago
@mherrenschmidt - It is in this film. They believe that government agents used machines making them sound like the loved ones of these families. See obvious when you think about it. Magic boxes, operated by agents with such detailed knowledge of every family it borders on psychic. They talked for up to 20 minutes without one family suspecting anything and even left taped messages they were so confident. But the Conspiracy Theorists can hear them once and just know they are all fake.
WillShakespeare2007 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
April 18, Monday. National Geographic Channel rebroadcast of "911: Science and Conspiracy". I highly recommend seeing it.
andyt1313 11 months ago
Here is a fact no one has an answer to yet, which probably is the most important one question: where were the teletubbies when this happened?
1973mazdarx4coupe 11 months ago
Look up the Harley Man on 911
He is pretty calm for just seeing people die. not to mention the crispy hat and tee-shirt. Not a wrinkle or stain or speck of dirt on him. Who is this guy? An actor or what? questions, questions, questions and no answers...hmm, what are they hiding?
richierino88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@richierino88 "Look up the Harley Man on 911
He is pretty calm for just seeing people die. not to mention the crispy hat and tee-shirt. Not a wrinkle or stain or speck of dirt on him. Who is this guy? An actor or what? questions, questions, questions and no answers...hmm, what are they hiding?"
A biker without a wrinkle, stain or speck of dirt on him? He was no biker!
KayBeeEee1983 9 months ago in playlist 9/11
what nobody looks at is the first world Trade center bombing. 9 basement floors were penetrated that are 29 foot thick of concrete. The official story is that a gas and oil bomb did that? Really? thats not even looking at 911. And look jet fuel burns at 1500 degrees structural steel melts at 2800-3500 degrees and is also coated with a fire proof coating, just talk to a Structural Engineer its not possible. Only in La la land, but even there not gonna happen. turn off your tv, wake up loiuses
richierino88 1 year ago
@richierino88 Whenever a "truth"er says "wake up!" or "open your eyes!" I tune out.
KayBeeEee1983 9 months ago in playlist 9/11
How did they not check the molten steel theory? What about the red/grey chips of thermite in the dust?
TahunaTheButcher1975 1 year ago
that specky cunt is on a few backhanders, notice that i'm so cleaver but i'm really talking out my arse smerk all over his chevvy chase. cunT
sksnkton 1 year ago
That makes no sense about WTC7. It implies that any of us could be building demolition experts as you just blow a few supports. Buildings topple over so why didn't this, just doesn't add up in the way it came down from the ground up too. Why wouldn't you say pull OUT and not pull IT? Makes me laugh how people on here question the intelectual capacity of others becasue they don't agree with each other. Is all odd but where are all the people who rigged it, you can't keep them quiet for ever.
WhiteWolfDiving 1 year ago
Comment removed
MilitaryMind4409 1 year ago
Has there ever been a study on the correlation between belief in conspiracy theories and intelligence level? I'd bet money a lot of the people leaving comments here have GEDs.
ZeframMann 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so let me guess this straight a fuckin 25 year old research editor is considered A EXPERT RESPONSE??? THIS VIDEO IS A FUCKIN JOKE THOSE DUMBASSES WORKING FOR A MAGAZINE ARE NOT EVEN CREDIBLE!!!!!!
QueenzNyc718 1 year ago
so let me guess this straight a fuckin 25 year old research editor is considered A EXPERT RESPONSE??? THIS VIDEO IS A FUCKIN JOKE THOSE DUMBASSES WORKING FOR A MAGAZINE ARE NOT EVEN CREDIBLE!!!!!!
QueenzNyc718 1 year ago
Thumbs up if you hate that popular mechanics gay,
ChristianHolloway7 1 year ago
Disingenuous talking heads spewing propaganda. May God toss them to the flames and they be forgotten as if they never existed. Despicable.
OzzybanOswald 1 year ago
why is it running backwards at 8.05?
ttimothymurphy 1 year ago
@ttimothymurphy - Because the computer that rendered this CGI (Computer Generated Images) was operated by incompetent people. Don't you understand that this is TV Fakery? It is not real. Remember the movie Independence Day from 1996? Same shit, made by less competent people.
elbuggo 1 year ago
i guess the moral of the story is, experts = expert liars
seesitnow4sure 1 year ago
PS if i was involved in covering this up , you can bet i could convince you i believed what i was saying too. Great lying skills dont equal truth.and thats all i have to add
seesitnow4sure 1 year ago
This same dismissing attitude is used to redicule UFO witnesses as well.And with hundreds of thousands of average joes and photos and smoking gun videos they still claim they dont know whats going on.Another theory is that 911 was a mini project blue beam and utilised advance satelite holigraphic tech. if this was indeed the case it would explain alot.Many researcher also feel chemtrail jets are unmanned and use this same tech.Nothing would shock me anymore
seesitnow4sure 1 year ago
so called experts are all defending with flimsy answers, but not one of them supports a deep investigation with amnesty for underling whistle blowers. if they are so sure why are they so afraid ?why not end these conspiricys once and for all by letting a real independent large scale big budget investigation to clear this up?the answer is obvious to me.
seesitnow4sure 1 year ago
damn, whos that dumbass 20 yr old kid talking on this subject? i wanna fuckin punch that kid right in the throat. he doesnt know shit hes just talking shit.
dcfanx1 1 year ago
bastard bush saw impeding attack and the opportunity of personal gain and siezed the moment and allowed thousands to die and let 1000s die and fucked the country over
Springwoodfinest 1 year ago
what i hate about this documentary is that they just shoot down the facts, have some guy sit infront of a camera and say "theorists are wrong" honestly why not take a scientific approach and show why things like a controlled demolition wasnt what happened at wtc 1 and 2/the pentagon bomb theory through science? mythbusters does it all the time, they are more than capable of doing the tests, personally i dont think it was a controlled demo i think the
Springwoodfinest 1 year ago
Popular Mechanics...liars!!...listen to their bullshit.
/watch?v=WULRQCgvsdE&feature=related
omertia 2 years ago
@omertia your an idot
C0mm0nS3ns3 2 years ago
@C0mm0nS3ns3
and you hide behind your computer calling people names...and who is the idiot?
omertia 2 years ago
@omertia
watch
SEPTEMBER CLUES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
structural steel loses strength at a FASTER rate than timber. This is one thing I remember from a construction textbook
erickthegreat98 2 years ago
people are fucking stupid, its common sense that all the building were controlled demolition, wake the fuck up you stupid people
aakko777 2 years ago
@aakko777
make sure you watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@aakko777 your a worthless lil dumbfuck. no proof that the buildings were wired. shut up nd go drown in a pond.
stovicini822 1 year ago
6:26 "This is what buildings look like when they fall down." When do 40+ story buildings fall down from fire damage? Buildings catch on fire all the time and don't fall down. Look up the Windsor building. Debunkers claim that conspiracy "theorists" don't have any evidence. This is a lie. Rather than looking to the controlled media to tell you what to think, why don't people think for themselves? The media is owned by a handful of gigantic corporations w/ agendas GE, Viacom, Disney and the like
bdh826 2 years ago
@bdh826
watch the vid
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
I dont think it was a conspiracy by the goverment but what happened with the airforce?
andrescaraudio 2 years ago
My job in US Air Force was sabotaging US Govt buildings, sabotaging US military aircraft, sabotaging US nukes by detonation of nuclear bombs on US military bases using conventional C4 explosive in controlled demolitions. 1,000s of US soldiers have this job every day. One reason why I'm on History Channel. PirateNews * org / flight93 * html - Read Operation Northwoods - that's an order!
operationnorthwoodz 2 years ago
YEAH I knew this document, that's one the evidence that made me start looking for alternatives and finally learn about the conspiracy theory (or at least some small part)
At first it's unbelievable, but after several weeks you just realize that it's logical and that it couldn't not be otherwise since people are so dependent on the system to work properly.
Story repeats itself and people are just too brainwashed to find the truth yet, maybe the next generation (Internet children).
supermembrax69 2 years ago
Go to the Vanity Fair website then politics->features->2006->08->norad200608
Replace "->" with "/"
For the same story archived from Aviation Week go to the Tinyurl website -> yqk2bc
nakedtruther 2 years ago
For those still in denial about the fact that we ran war games prior to 9/11 simulating terrorists hijacking airplanes and using them as flying bombs see: watch?v=bdn0AOC76s4#t=0m50s
nakedtruther 2 years ago
Let's see. In the first few seconds of this film the "expert" claims that NORAD is only geared toward external threats. Did he ever hear about operation Vigilant Guardian? It was an exercise NORAD was running ON 9/11 which simulated defending the country against hijacked aircraft WITHIN US AIRSPACE being used as flying bombs. The "experts" chose to leave this fact out. Why?
nakedtruther 2 years ago
BECAUSE THEYRE IN ON IT DUH
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
Or maybe they're just Egyptian because they live in "deNile". There are clearly facts that don't support the official story that need to be looked into instead of glossed over.
nakedtruther 2 years ago
Unfortunately most of these "facts" are plain falsification of the mainstream story by conspiracy nuts. Like their claim that the fire couldn't have melted the steel so it couldn't have been the cause of the collapse - nobody ever talked about molten steel. The steel was WEAKENED by the fires, which was enough for it to succumb under the weight it had to bear. Or your claim that Vigilant Guardian was about hijackings within the USA - it really postulated attacks from Russia. So tasteless.
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
According to the NIST report 'weakened steel" had nothing to do with the collapses. But I wouldn't expect you to know that. You don't even know what your own official story is saying. The NIST report claims "thermal expansion" which is quite different from "weakened steel".
nakedtruther 2 years ago
first of all im not FOR nor against the conspiracy i honesty am not that interested. what im dissatisfied with the fact that they dont provide any concrete evidence to their so called facts. i dont think that 911 was a controlled demolition i do think that Bush knew it was coming and used it as an opportunity to scare the american ppl to his will. if your gonna debunk something do it right dont just tell people theyre wrong and simply dismiss them as radical idiots
Springwoodfinest 2 years ago 14
That's exactly what I think.
All this video shows is that specialists disagree. That's all. And that's a real big problem.
WE want facts not opinions. We want a real controlled inquiry and made in parallel by several institutions to make sure that they tell the same thing! It's such a big event, it should not be left as a controversial subject. We are not speaking about UFOs we are speaking about people who died and a war in Iraq.
supermembrax69 2 years ago
It doesn't matter how much 9/11 is explained, there will always be people who disagree and would rather believe in an "alternate version". People like this will never think differently no matter how much someone shows them they're wrong. So why should we pay them any attention?
lazzo000 2 years ago
Because some very skilled scientists showed that the NIST report has been faked and that several proof have been ignored. The standard fire inquiry protocol has not been followed. There are explosive traces in the remains, and no one explained it but simply ignored it.
There are two great videos made a chef scientist very well known (and I checked his background to be sure, and you can to)
Two 9min. videos:
1 : "Debunking 9/11: NIST Building 7"
2: 9/11 The Best Evidence & Science against NIST
supermembrax69 2 years ago
These videos show that NIST has made many mistakes and he makes a lot of good points in that respect however, he also uses straw-man arguments and false claims to push his idea that buildings were destroyed in a controlled demolition. That's not something you sholuld do if expect to be taken seriously.
He talks about the Winsor Madrid fire, but fails to mention that the Winsor was supported by conrete columns which were not present in the WTC.
(continued)
lazzo000 2 years ago
(part 2)
The laser thermometer shown in your
2nd video can only record surface temperatures, not the core temperature so the fires WERE hot enough to weaken the steel. The "explosive traces" were ignored because the scientist who know better know it's nonsense.
Google: "final word on niels harrit"
He claims that Bush's Brother was in charge of WTC Security, that tower 1 fell at free-fall speed and early reports of WTC7 collapse is proof of foreknowledge.
(continued)
lazzo000 2 years ago
(part 3)
Those claims have all been disproven with videos on RKOwens4's channel.
lazzo000 2 years ago
OK. Everyone can make a mistake from time to time.
But the real problem in this story is that the fire inquiry protocols have been ignored, several proof have been ignored.
I think that scientist tried honestly to find the truth, but the truth was so harsh that there brain could not accept it, that's how unconsciously they went on the wrong trail, and from there the proof they couldn't explain were ignored.
I think that we have made an honest mistake about 9-11 and it will cost us.
supermembrax69 2 years ago
(part 2)
And don't get me wrong, when I say that proof have been ignored, it's a critic and not a reproach.
In every inquiries you assemble evidences and you focus on those you can explain! There is always a little unexplainable part.
Go on alienScientist channel. He's a chief scientist and produce a lot of science reports and videos.
He may be wrong but usually he's not.
There are two video you should see:
"Debunking 9/11: NIST Building 7 "
"9/11 The Best Evidence & Science against NIST "
supermembrax69 2 years ago
I have already seen those videos. AlienScientist isn't just making mistakes, he's spreading claims that have been disproven years ago.
To be honest, Im not sure how much of a grip on reality AlienScientist has. He believes that the government is conspiring to "enslave mankind" and start a "New World Order", and he list "making contact with aliens" as one of his hobbies.
lazzo000 2 years ago 7
I don't see the problem with his hobby. A hobby doesn't change your work. If he playing baseball it would be the same :-D
About the conspiracy theory... Some time ago I checked it very deeply, and to be truly honest, I don't know what to think.
A lot of evidence and a lot of very credible people say that it's possible. More than that, they say it's likely.
An honest scientist has to admit the possibility.
What makes me really suspicious is that people don't want to hear about it. Why is that?
supermembrax69 2 years ago
(part2)
And again, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that the conspiracy is true... I'm saying that I'm suspicious, and because I saw the proofs, I know that It's far from being impossible.
So, if it's not impossible, why people don't want to hear about it? Why do people believe that corruption doesn't exist? Why do people underestimate the power of corruption.
After all, scientists and Leaders are normal humans, they lie 4 money. It's human nature.
Everybody should see the probability!
supermembrax69 2 years ago
(part3)
And that's why I believe that it's the scientists duty to show us that it's far from being impossible. Not in order to start chaos or mass fear, but in order to show people that they need to remain open to the possibility, and to take care of this.
People are too proud (not stupid, but proud) to admit that it's possible.
The conspiracy theory is a great story, showing us how it could be possible and how we would not be able to see it.
There's a great moral and a great lesson to learn.
supermembrax69 2 years ago
@lazzo000 To many crazies loose anymore...
C0mm0nS3ns3 2 years ago
lol RKOwens4 is no engineer...
albertsamerica 2 years ago
@albertsamerica
Rko Owens is a Moron
watch this instead
JOHN LEAR 911
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest
watch
911 TABOO
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest did u read the new foxnews article???? they admitted to bringing down building 7 and it takes weeks to do that.....what now idiots?????? wake up!!!!!!
Only4luv 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest at 8:16 said silverstein meant pull out firefighters right....now google "building 7 foxnews" u will be amazed, u were all wrong the whole damn time!!!!!!
Only4luv 1 year ago
@Only4luv your wrong. buildiung 7 was already debunked. no controled demolition.
stovicini822 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest scare american people. the people were already scared. what were u gonna shoot down, "your own commercial plane with innocent people". really. the conspiracy thoerists are a bunch of ignorant non factual idiots.
stovicini822 1 year ago
@stovicini822
or maybe controlled opposition?
tangel476 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest and we dismiss you as well, no need for name calling
seesitnow4sure 1 year ago
@Springwoodfinest no shit! i would not call this a debunk. shame on history channel.
sqottslahuud 6 months ago
@Springwoodfinest glad i red your comment before i posted anything, i would've written the exact same thing :)
SemenWhoCanSee 4 months ago in playlist History Channel on 9/11 Myths
shut up moron. no one cares what you think.
odserick 2 years ago
Obviously you do. But you'd rather not think at all. If you did you would look up in time to look up in information about the wargames. It's easier to name call then to actually engage in intelligent debate isn't it?
nakedtruther 2 years ago
Don't forget long time ago, back when Nixon was president, there was a pilot that was getting let go by the Air Force. Well he did not like that so he got drunk and stole a helicopter.
He LANDED that helicopter on the White House. So just remember the most secured building in the world can still be infiltrated by a flying device.
WenzelCORP 2 years ago
It was about planes coming from the area of the former USSR. Not about planes hijacked inside the country. You stupid turds constantly come up with so called incongruities in the mainstream story that you make yourself look like fools. Just take all the thousands of objections you have raised against the story and decide for yourself how likely it is for all of them to be true. It's just brain shit by wannabe thought criminals desperately trying to show everyone how critical they are. Fucktards.
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
No moron. You're confusing the wargames. One was BOMBERS coming from Russia. The other was hijacked airplanes from WITHIN the U.S.
nakedtruther 2 years ago
You talked about operation Vigilant Guardian and that operation was about bombers coming from the former Soviet Union. It's in the 9/11 Commission Report. It's not my fault you call things names they don't have, you fucking retard.
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
Comment removed
nakedtruther 2 years ago
Here's the deal moron. There were multiple parts to the same exercise. One part was indeed Russian bombers. The other part WAS HIJACKED AIRPLANES USED AS FLYING BOMBS! This was reported in Vanity Fair by someone WHO LISTENED TO THE ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS of tapes of the exercise! Google Vanity Fair NORAD tapes. This was also reported in Aviation Week as part of VIGILANT GUARDIAN! So what if the 9/11 commission left this out? Commissioner Bob Graham admitted the report was censored.
nakedtruther 2 years ago
wow this is just a bunch of biased bullshit, they are mad at the conspiracy theorists for not giving "facts" yet they do not show any of their own. i dont want a vague explanation of what happened i wanna see controlled experiments reliving those exact conditions. then i will be convinced. until such things happen. i will remain skeptical of the "official" story
Springwoodfinest 2 years ago
I just love how people like you whine about the debunkers not providing you with satisfying facts while not raising any concrete objections of your own. Derision ("biased bullshit") is the classical argument of people who don't have anything to say but don't want to admit that. Just try to discredit your opponent and hope that this way you can eschew providing your own arguments.
So tasteless.
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
Google USAToday 9/11 wargames. I can't post links because Youtube sucks (just like you) but you can read the following.
===================
WASHINGTON — In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.
===================
Note there were multiple wargames going on at the same time.
nakedtruther 2 years ago
Conspiracy THEORIES (nuff said) Fuck off morons.
Nightrage0o 2 years ago
I bet you were one of the 70% of Americans that bought into the conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11. Even some of the 9/11 commission members have said there are problems with the final report. Two wrote a book saying they were lied to by the Pentagon and NORAD. Bob Graham gave a speech where he said information about U.S. allies being involved in the attack was censored. But hey, just hate on those trying to find the truth.
nakedtruther 2 years ago
the more and more is see docs like this i think it was an inside job....
ZEDRICKMALONE 2 years ago
Comment removed
ChristinaNL89 2 years ago
these people ever stop to think for even ONE-mother-fucking-second that "oh wait, we're just about to perpertrate these evil deeds to further our cause in this material world, but.... BUT, what if we have to go through something like Hostel or Saw in hell as a direct result of these misdeeds?? What about THAT? If hell DOES turn out to be true, and we DO end-up there, will I even be able to endure all that shit?? Will it all be abit too much for me?? Fuck, I had better stop this evil right NOW."
dwarfinmyhouse 2 years ago
My point? Have these evil governmental "inside job" motherfuckers who perpertrated 9/11 (majorly hardcore evil cunts like Cheney for example) never given even 1 second's thought to the fact that there might be a very feasible possibility of having to go to hell and endure an eternity of EXTREEEEEEME torture for what they have done? Same goes for ANYBODY who does evil during their life, be it Adolf Hitler, Kenneth Lay, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson or even the everyday common petty thief. Did none of
dwarfinmyhouse 2 years ago
Who's seen the film Saw (in fact, all 5 of them, most particularly the 3rd)? Who's seen Hostel parts I and II? You ever imagined hell (oh yes bwoy, believe me, it fuckin' DOES exist even if Heaven doesn't.... how else would evil people be punished after death for their malevolant deeds during their lifetime??) to be like thse films? I reckon that's EXACTLY what hell is gonna be (and IS) like. Unimaginable extremes of physical and psychological torment when you're all fuckin' tied-up and gagged!
dwarfinmyhouse 2 years ago
watch?v=6tovqJQC2tA
watch?v=ABc1TSBO7_Y
citizenfor911truth1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 inside job
ddaniel77 2 years ago
prove it.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
Continued from 5... Both of these factors may have made the building more likely to collapse, but what Mr. Megs doesn't say is that these things made it more likely to tip over, not to fall into its own footprint.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
5. Again, Jim Megs is trying to imply that building 7 was more likely to collapse because of its structure. Yes, the was hollower at the bottom. Yes, the building did have truses holding it up. And yes, this may have made it more likely to collapse. What he doesn't mention is that the truses made the building very asymetrical. His comment also about a large section of the building being scooped out from the bottom refers to the 25% scooped out theory(recently discredited).
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
4. They tried to say there was no evidence of demolition in the debris pile of building 7. This is not true. Not once in this entire documentary does any so called "expert" mention the huge pools of molten metal found in the debris piles of all 3 buildings. That is a great indicater of something other than normal fires in the building.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
3. Larry Silverstein's comment I admit is one of the more unconvincing theories about building 7. I don't know if he was actually talking about blowing up the building. All I will say on the matter is that both the FEMA and NIST reports stated that there were no firefighting efforts being done in WTC 7. So either Silverstein lied or both FEMA and NIST lied.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
2. Jim Megs is trying to imply that Building 7 collapsed the same way that all damaged buildings fall, into their own footprint. However, if you go on the internet you'll see hundreds of videos of buildings collapsing outside of controlled demolition and they all end up tipping over. They don't fall sraight down through the path of greatest resistance. So as far as Jim Meg's comment is concerned, it just a flat out lie.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
Lets get a few things strait about WTC 7.
1. It may seem crazy to destroy a building to destroy lots of information, but not from a financial point of view. Silverstien had that building insured for over 800 million dollars and it costed him about 300 million to rebuild. He essentially made 500 million dollars off the buildings collapse. So, at least to the people who owned WTC 7, the building's destruction was not a financial loss.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago
5:10 "if you can't prove exactly how these building fell then it had to get blown up"---No the people I listen and talk to say that there is something wrong and we need an explanation, not that this definitively proves that it got blown up. Very neatly placed wording I'd say---I'm sorry I'll keep on trying with the actual article that Popular mechanics put out and anything else that I can find but as for how they try and make sense of WTC7 in this , I am just not seeing it there way
budrobrother 2 years ago
4:00 the speak of buildings 5 and 6 and note that the conspirators don't mention this. I would have to say that is because the did not fall into themselves. I am not trying to start a whirl wind of hatred towards me rather I am just trying to show how easily it can go back on them.
budrobrother 2 years ago 2
The "experts" don't add any factual evidence either in this entire documentary. They just basically say "Nuh, that's just dumb what they say. Those conspiracy guys".
strakallah 2 years ago 3
then y u dont u read the book they put out, it seems to me they're summarizing what was in the book
Beto805Cali 2 years ago
I can just hear the phone call to Bush
"Mr.President, the paper shredders are out of order. Should we destroy the entire building?" Yeah that makes sense. Conspiracy nutjobs will come up with anything to prove something that simply isn't there.
AmericasFan 3 years ago 3
hahahahah good one
alpinestar300 3 years ago
The worst: If you could have proof for it, it will stand better that some part of the conspiracy theory.
therrydicule 3 years ago
Ironically America'sFan, your not far from the truth. The world Trade Centre had run out of pencil sharpeners - it cost the US taxpayer 3 billion a month to keep supplying those buildings with the neccesary pencil sharpeners, there had to be some way of solving this problem.
Do you know where the worlds biggest supply of pencil sharpeners is?????
Thats right, Afghanistan. Fill in the Gaps.
00000Dean00000 3 years ago 12
@00000Dean00000 Hahaha 10 points for this comment. Had no idea this topic could make me laugh. Sarcasm rules!!
FormulaKarin 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 i heard that osama has a penchil sharpener fetish. he wouldnt give the US any pencil sharpeners. What would you do if someone didnt give you a pencil sharpener at a reasonable price? of course you would go to war with them !
kagoshimadavid 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 i get your point but shouldnt it be pencils instead of pencil sharpeners since sharpeners have a way much longer life span? :D
texasdurp 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 i get your point but shouldnt it be pencils instead of pencil sharpeners since sharpeners have a way much longer life span? :D
texasdurp 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 Are you just being ironic or are you actually implying that the American government orchastrated 9/11 because they were running out of pencil sharpeners?
theoneandonlygrod 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 Pound for pound best comment ever! Brilliant!
minimanukuk 1 year ago
@00000Dean00000 I hope your not serious....
ItsJustME8921 1 year ago
Where's parts 5 & 8?
ChiefHoot 3 years ago 4
popular mechanics didn't explain at all about the passenger calling his mom and stating his full name. also why the hell did Cheney take so long in getting an order to shoot down planes at 10:30? you'd think he do it sometime right after the NYC trade center attacks.
perplexedone 3 years ago
Why would PM explain it when Alice Hoglan, the mother of that passenger, already has explained it?
Unless you have a credible claim to know Mark Bingham much much better than his own mother does, your criticism is asinine.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
lol its amazing... the "experts" don't explain shit.. they jst say that there's no way the conspiracy theorists can be right
jfgordon1 3 years ago
exactly dude..and that stupid looking guy with glasses lokks he is an 'expert' for everything..but at the end of the day he is just stupid puppet
originalorol 3 years ago
amen brotha
jfgordon1 3 years ago
thank you!!!
DARKELLAKEL 3 years ago
I think the free fall so called 'controlled demolition' is by far the funniest wannabe evidence that conspiraters love to point out. How do you expect to see a building fall? side ways to the right with not too much noise? Is that a proper way for a 500 ft building to fall? Fuckin retarded. They just say shit and have no training in demolitions. LMFAO! PULL IT? THATS WHAT SHE SAID. XD
That 18 year old conspirater needs to be laid.
deployer7 3 years ago
'Building 7 was heavily damaged by the debris from both towers'
From 300 feet away?!
ericmiami21 3 years ago
yeah 300 feet away. When a building is 12oo feet tall, 300 feet is pretty close.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago 2
So it collapses completely? Bldg. 7 was HUGE-doesn't make sense.
ericmiami21 3 years ago
Just because it does not make sense to YOU does not mean the explanation is false.
My dog is confused by the TV. Doesnt mean the TV isnt real.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
I'm not saying the collapse wasn't real-just the government's explanation on WHY it fell.
Also, it doesn't just not make sense to me-there's a whole movement that questions bldg 7's collapse and are demanding a re-investigation.
Before you comment, however, please consider that the 9/11 Commission report said nothing about the collapse or the witnesses that were inside it before it fell and their accounts of EXPLOSIONS. Consider Barry Jennings' account, for example.
ericmiami21 3 years ago
Again, back to the same point.
just because it doesnt make sense to you does absolutely zero to prove it false.
youre just going to have to get over it. Its possible things are really "no-shit" true even if you cant understand them.
7 was not in the 911cr for the same reasons any of the other damaged and destroyed buildings were--it was a report on the terrorist attack. Not a "list list all the damage to every building that day" report.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
It sounds like, to you, the fall of building 7as a result of 'collateral damage' from a terrorist attack means that it's a non issue. Please keep in mind that 7 housed the Office of Emergency Management, branch offices of the secret service, the CIA, the Department of Defense, the Securities and Exchange Commission and a lot more.
I guess it comes down to whether you believe the 911 commission report.
ericmiami21 3 years ago
The next time you think that the 911 CR couldn't be a cover-up or a whitewash, consider who the Bush Admin was going to appoint, originally, to head the commission:
Henry Kissinger, the King of Cover-up.
Also, don't you find it strange that there were 12 times the usual confirmed put options on American Airlines and United Airlines stock up to 5 days prior to 9/11?
Snopes will claim FALSE to that, since the 9/11 CR is considered credible by them but even they confirm the put options.
ericmiami21 3 years ago
Look, it simply comes down to proof.
And twoofers have none.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
True, lack of proof does not constitute proof.
But what constitutes as proof in this situation? Does Barry Jenning's videotaped account of explosions going off at the bottom of wtc 7 count as proof? Or does William Rodriguez's accounts of explosions prior to the plane crashes into the twins count as proof as well?
According to skeptics/experts, no-they don't. The CR served the administration more than it did anyone else since "[their] aim has not been to assign individual blame".
ericmiami21 3 years ago
"But what constitutes as proof in this situation?"
Actual evidence. Given the size of the 3 towers, there should be thousands and thousands of miles of det cord left. debris such as caps, shock tubing would litter the area. Yet not ONE smallest shred was found.
Real demolitions look and sound like these.
watch?v=eRZPPdf_sm0&feature=related
watch?v=eUIdf4UJ3_4&feature=related
watch?v=ZlGmnKvOhlg&feature=related
Nothing like that recorded on 911. Despite hundreds of cameras.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago
Ok, I don't have a background in demolition or construction so I can't say that there wouldn't be miles of det cord, etc. I can't contest that.
ericmiami21 3 years ago
""Ok, I don't have a background in demolition or construction so I can't say that there wouldn't be miles of det cord, etc. I can't contest that.""
Thats why you want to actually check with actual demo guys before deciding it was a CD.
See how that works? do the research FIRST, THEN decide if you think it was a dem or not.
EdgemanLL2 3 years ago