The Bible is a Reliable Source: New Testament Contains Errors? - Pt 2

[xJaysrox]

yes I agree, the vast majority of errors are gramatical. but there are still hundredsof errors that are NOT gramatical.

How can you claim that it doesn't change the big picture when there are 100 of small mistakes.. the big picture is made out of small details...

anyway think about this:

When did jesus die? before or after passover

Did jesus stay 3 days and 3 nights in his toomb like he promised the jews

The 99% accuracy is amazing: but the source is wrong so it doesn't matter

[mrnicemr1]

dumb and ugly: the perfect christan!

[bullviii]

@mrnicemr1 yeah right, like you had a shot with this cutie...

btw where did you get your manners? punk

[bullviii]

@mrnicemr1 a rude moron, the perfect atheist!

[mrnicemr1]

@bullviii

at least i am able to think by my own and don't need a 2000 years old book (written by humans) that says me what i have to do.

one thing to the point "moron". what is smarter: thinking by your own or just believing whats told to you?

and for sure she is not a cutie ;)

[quranresponse]

@mrnicemr1 rape, and killing, in the bible

[compendiumgravemind]

so if you died due to lack of any cures.... if the bible is 99.5- 99.9% correct then viruses are not real. you should stop taking shots and let yourself die. sorry but if your saying the bible is 99% true your saying the very sciences that keep your sorry ass alive are not. bullet proof vest work better then prayer. =)

to bad, idk why but from some reasion most pretty girls are completely incompetent when it comes to understanding. id like to say what, but just about anything honestly.

[chiggero]

Jesus said that terrorism was the shit and that going to work was for losers.

[caralhoman]

Jesus said that deseases are caused by deamons. No mention to viruses, or bacterias, funguses, deficiency of organs... just deamons. That is 1 error. ONE. This one and only error in the New Testament is enought to discard the idea of a divine Jesus, a Jesus-who-is-God, regardless the scripture's authenticity.

The New Testament also states that the follower of Jesus does not die by drinking poison. It would be a waste of a handesomely beautiful daughter of Asia would she try to proof it true.

[anonymousSWE]

Where the hell do these fucking people get the EGO to think their religion is the right one and THEY PERSONALLY are chosen by god?!

Do these fucking idiots have any clue of how many different religions there has been over the course of time?!

Bitch please!

[42lynchmob]

No its not. Sorry.

[Cthemotorcyclist1982]

Student nurse? I think my heart almost stopped beating while watching your videos! Nice work.

[ajmc1992]

the bible has over 1000 contradictions

[sonofgodamen]

@ajmc1992 were is this 1000 contradiction? 1156 chpter of the BIBLE, and I have found none.. read somethings that I did understand, and there is thing were will never be able to understand on this side... amen.. love always your brother in christ.. read EZEKIEL 33:6-9. ISA.1:18 also.. thanks asonofGODamen..

[sonofgodamen]

TEHOLY SPIRIT WROTE THE BIBLE, AND MEN COULD NO DO THIS.. AMEN.

WE ARE A KINGDOM CITIZENS.... WE MUST REPENT, AND TURN FROM OUR SINFUL WAYS.. WALK IN GLORY... SO STUDY........ LOVE ALWAYS YOU BROTHER IN CHRIST..AMEN

[MultiCheckers1]

could you show your feet?

[2girlsand1kup]

this girl have shit for brains

[sonofgodamen]

@2girlsand1kup

YOU SHOULD RPENT FOR BEING MEAN/ UP TO YOU.. SO WHAT YOU GOING TO DO?

STAY IN SIN, OR BE A CHILD OF GOD. AMEN..

[FoxOutsideBox]

@sonofgodamen Somebody really needs to slap the stupid out of you. GOD IS NOT REAL!

[sonofgodamen]

@FoxOutsideBox Well? prove to me that HE is not real? ok.. Because wind you can not see it, but it is there, because you can feel it, so can you feel GOD in your life we you let HIM in...You dont believe in HIM, because you have become content in you sin?.right.. JESUS fights my battles, I dont have the need to slap my brothers, only have love for you in JESUS name. amen.. so get proof there is, or is not.. what is it going to be?.. so please repent...180movie.com..

[FoxOutsideBox]

@sonofgodamen Here are two blatant examples of contradictions in the Gospels. I will send you 40 more in a private message.

1) How many generations were there between Abraham to David? Matthew 1:17 lists fourteen generations. Matthew 1:2 lists thirteen generations.

2) Who approached Jesus? (Matthew 8:5-7) The Centurion approached Jesus, beseeching help for a sick servant. (Luke 7:3 & 7:6-7) The Centurion did not approach Jesus. He sent friends and elders of the Jews.

[sonofgodamen]

@FoxOutsideBox (MATTHEW 8:5-13) it was about the centurion faith, you say the word LORD, 13.Then Jesus said to the centurion, "GO! it will be done just as you believed it would." And the servant was healed at that very hour. both LUKE and MATTHEW are alittle different, but the same about faith if you can only believe HIS word, It will be done, the same for as it was done for the centurion.. THANKS

[sonofgodamen]

@sonofgodamen: ABRAHAMIC covenant, GOD made with Abram, and GOD made promises, and GOD changed his name from Abram to Abraham.

my point is that GOD bound HIMSELF to HIS word. When he made agreements legally binding forever.. amen. thats awesome..

[sonofgodamen]

@sonofgodamen look at Genesis 12-25 

[sacredbunny246]

That there are manuscripts that back up what the current bible says compared to the original texts does not prove the new testament historically accurate, only literally accurate. We can show that it corresponds to the original text. Showing that the text is correct does not lead to historical accuracy.

[tetralophodon]

what kind of logic is this, you're just denying it because you don't agree with it.

Showing that the text is correct does not lead to historical accuracy. if we followed that logic everything in history would simply be accurate, and nothing would be true. If it makes a claim that is historically accurate, and has outside sources, the logical conclusion is it is true. Like i said, no historian denies his existence, only his divinity

[sacredbunny246]

The manuscripts show that the bible has survived through generations of transcription and translation to be pretty much the same in a literary sense. That does not show that what is written in the bible or on the manuscripts is historical truth. There is no documentation that Jesus ever existed except for those manuscripts. The existence of Socrates is even debated based on similar situations. Such as Jesus with the Bible, there is no historical evidence for Socrates except Plato's works.

[tetralophodon]

ugh, again, there are documents outside of the bible showing his existence and its not like these people were making it up, they were respected historians who would not have forged such falsehoods, especially Tacitus, he would have been beheaded for just making up some story about a man named Christ. Say what you want about Josephus, but the only thing wrong with Josephus manuscripts are three or four changed words which come 7 words after the word Christ

[tetralophodon]

i wasn't aware we were friends hmm. What academic sources do you have to show this, oh wait, there are non, its just a bunch of atheists here on youtube who hate God and just spew up a bunch of false doctrine on the bible. There was no other man at that time claiming to be the Christ who was crucified or caused such an uproar as Jesus did. Thats where the correlation comes in. They said there was a man named Christ, who was crucified, who started a revolution who was said to be resurrected

[sacredbunny246]

I hold no ill will to you. I am preparing to send you a message to continue the discussion. I am sure we have spammed enough on here. I will attempt to find academic sources for you, but I will not display them here as I don't exactly have them on me, but i will look for you and if I find none I will admit that to you.

[tetralophodon]

well go ahead, but i do agree not enough room to have an informed discussion

[hpufo]

Ok, if the bible is a reliable source use it on your next college paper, and watch your professor bitch slap you for that.

[MatthiasFarland]

Ratings disabled, dear?

Sadness.

[PeacefuIBreeze]

You forgot to mention not one manuscript dates back to the time of Jesus.

[tetralophodon]

they do however date back to within five years of his crucifixion., close enough, the manuscripts on caeser were about 200 years after he died

[KaseyAkira]

If you want to convert "us atheist" - do what AronRa and Thunderf00t do.

Take Aron's videos and disect them, taking them apart, and showing us all point by point by point how Aron is wrong. Do that, and we'll all convert to Christianity right here and now.

What's that? Cant do it? Thats right. Sit down, shut up, and get off the internet.

[tetralophodon]

Well we do that, just not me, and thunderfoot and AronRA only follow the false doctrines Rlichard dawkins and Christopher hitchens have played out. And the new philosophers of the Anglo world are doing a good job at tearing their versions of God apart and building up the good ones again

[KaseyAkira]

"Well we do that,"

◘ Name 1 person who has done it, and actually refuted anything they've said.

[tetralophodon]

who does what? refute atheist claims Dr william lane craig G.K.chesterson Dinesh D'souza Kent Hovind Father barron VFX Philos71 djemil5 IDquest chrisitianjr4

[KaseyAkira]

Putting Kent Hovind and VFX (now known as PCS) in your list of champions only proves that you have not watched Tf00t or Aronra, or understood my original statement.

Which was: the aforementioned atheist are able to dissect and refute creationist vids point by point (the way Tf00t does with Hovind), but creationist never do this with atheist vids. They never refute them point by point the way atheist can.

All you did was post a list of names, most of them already pwned.

[KaseyAkira]

On the other hand I guess its typical to expect. Dont listen to anything the other person says, just wait till they stop talking and recite a list or verse.

[tetralophodon]

first of all, claiming ad hominem attacks on anyone is a fallacy and cant be used in an argument, nor do i take it seriously, and only shows your lack of compassion as a person. I don't attack your prophets don't attack mine.

We don't attack personal videos because we don't care about you, we don't cater to you personally, we don't say "oh well they want us to refute them personally" thats what debates are for, we refute overall topics, were not nit pickers get over it

[KaseyAkira]

Its not an ad hominem unless I'm attacking someone IN PLACE OF an argument, which I'm not. Calling someone an asshole, then following that up with how his argument fails, is not an ad hominem. Calling someone an asshole and saying he's wrong because he's an asshole IS an ad hominem.

"You just called someone a name! AD HOMINEM! WAAAmbulance!"

Second, you're still not answering the basic question. Atheist can refute Creationist videos, so why cant Creationist refute Atheist videos?

[tetralophodon]

well it is an ad hominem, because your argument was that if i got my info from people like VFX or kent hovind then I was wrong or that they were wrong simply because you dont like them

[KaseyAkira]

Goddammit, we already called the WAAAmbulance, now it feels like the drama lama followed me home, robbed my house and ass raped me.

It was NOT an adhominem attack. My statement was that Kent Hovind has been refuted again, again, again, and again. So has PCS. At least 100 videos exist now where both of these assholes have been refuted, yet you use them as examples of "Atheist being refuted". Your position is made of fail and aids.

[tetralophodon]

drama lama? i dont follow

No i was being sarcastic towards you because you like to nit pick, i dont care what you or any of your prophets thinks about kent hovind, none of his positions has been officially refuted, hes only been mocked by hateful people such as yourself and Tfoot. ooh assholes, did you learn that at school?

simply claiming my positions are filled with fail and aids doesnt bring down my argument, please dissect it in a video, or else i am ultimate!!!

[tetralophodon]

also! saying they got pwned, doesnt make you look cool :) it makes you look like a noob

[KaseyAkira]

Oh look you just called me a noob. AD HOMINEM! Someone call a second WAAAmbulance!

Again, if you know so much, why not dissect and destroy a thunderf00t or AronRa video?  Show us all how they're wrong, since they keep showing everyone how you're wrong.

Oh thats right, you cant do it. All you got is that sorry excuse of "We dont cater" which has nothing to do with what I said.

[tetralophodon]

yes please, i would enjoy that, noob, is this comment supposed to make me cry or something?

because get this, NO ONE CARES, we don't dissect personal videos, we dissect common arguments, like "why is there evil in the world if God exists?", "Why wont God heal amputees" we don't take time to personally dissect their videos. And there probably are, i just don't care to know of any, if you want one so bad, go find one, its not like hes amazing or something, go do some research

[tetralophodon]

ALSO! its not an ad hominem attack because i didn't say you WERE a noob, i said you LOOK like a noob, its a simile, get it right

[k87jury]

VFX.... HAHAHAHAHAHA

Thank you for showing you are completely inept in any intellectual discussion. HAHAHA.

Bye Bye Creationist.

[tetralophodon]

Veirtas48 ikester7579 grammastola 3superdogs discovery institute 5thwatcher stevecrowder onetruechruch Saintmichaelmedia bereanbeacon kristinalovesjesus mousy21 thegospeldude thechristiandefender Dr.oakley

[tetralophodon]

to name a few

[tetralophodon]

And simply giving me a rhetorical question and then answering it is just another reason why atheists make me laugh, you have no idea how to debate, you simply hear something on the internet by your atheist bigot friends, and then come and preach it to us, you have no philosophical grounding, you have never read any biblical history, you only read thundef00ts history, so until such a time comes when you can be respectful to everyone on here, dont expect your pitiful threats to scare us

[k87jury]

I am sorry to tell you this, but who ever told you the information in your sideboard lied to you. Not only have there been many significant mistakes copying the manuscripts, there have have been many intentional changes to the text by Christians to support their view of the religion.

[tetralophodon]

Well im sorry to correct you but there are no mistakes, the new versions of the bible are 99.7 or so percent accurate to the original copies, if we burned all of the bibles in the world, we would still be able to make a brand new one, with no missing info from all of the existing scrolls, and manuscripts. Even time magazine admitted this. Our bible is the only piece of religious history, which is so accurate.

[k87jury]

If Time Magazine said that, they are very much uninformed, and need to study Textual Criticism, not to mention that there are things in the Bible that can not be verified and are in fact contradictive of archeological finds.

[tetralophodon]

well then go take it up with them, the bible doesnt contradict any archeolgical finds, in fact recent finds show that the the bibles story of king david is becoming more and more clear with archeological finds in israel

[tetralophodon]

the critisicm of the bible deals with the religious implications of it, no historians deny the existance of Jesus, even the atheist/secular historians are pretty sure he existed, he has records outside of the bible, and roman records indicate a man named Yeshua was cruficied around the year AD 33 and he was crucified under ponties pilate, and killed on Golgutha, and they found records from pilate himself showing he tried a man name Yeshua the christ, so claimed king of the Jews

[thirdLeg]

actually there is a big debate whethter he really existed. You're being intellectually dishonest. The sad part is you don't realize it.

[tetralophodon]

not amongst top biblical scholars and historians, its just an underground debate if you see videos like Zeitgiest, or the god who wasnt there, non of those as been accpeted by any scholar, and none of those documentaries if you want to call them that, have been academically tolerated, and no one scientist/historian has promoted either of those, im not being intellectually dishonest, im telling he truth

[k87jury]

1. You apparently have no idea what Textual Criticism is. It is a field that studies how literature changes over time. For instance, the story of the adulteress women and "let he without sin throw the first stone" Was not added to the Bible until after 800 A.D. That is only one example of the multitudes of changes that have happened over the last 2000 years.

[tetralophodon]

And you apparantly dont know the bible, it was finished officially in around AD 500, and either entire books were removed by protestantism, or versions were made with altered translations. The adulteres women was not added in AD 800 however some scholars dont know if it was in his original gospel, or if it was omitted until such a time as it was added again. And NO changes have been made to any doctrine, like i said the only changes that happen came out of protestantism, and new versions.

[tetralophodon]

yes, they added Deuteronomy and another Hebrew book into the old testament, it had nothing to do with adding or subtracting something from the new testament, the NT was finished in AD 100, and at the council of Nicea it was put together with the OT to make the bible as we know it today

[ideologger]

@tetralophodon Huh? The NT certainly wasn't finished in AD 100. The books of what became the NT were likely finished by the late 100s, but the NT itself wasn't "finished" until the late fourth or early fifth century. That is, 350+ years after Jesus was thought to have died. The OT canon was completed then too, until Luther removed many books in the 16th century. If he had his way Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation would also have been removed.

[tetralophodon]

the only changes that have occured to the bible were the removal of such books as dueteronomy, and leviticus, by certain protestant groups, adifferent translations have occured, however with the confirmation of the dead sea scrolls, nothing has changed to any of these books since their writings. And not only that, ever single version of bible translation is around today, so saying that it changed is quite a misnomer

[k87jury]

This isn't true. I don't know where you read this information but they lied to you. There have been multiply changes, accidental and purposeful.

watch?v=ft2HrV9i5h4

[tetralophodon]

theyve lied to me, thats all you have, i have studied biblical criticism, the only points points of dispute are the points of Jesus divinity, no one denies he existed, nor does giving me a link to a website do anything for your apparant lack of knowledge on the subject

[k87jury]

Actually there is still a discussion on his existence, especially since he was not the only one around the time making those kinds of claims. And I was giving you a link to MY video because I do have knowledge on this subject. I have the research of Bart Erhman and other experts on the new testament. I also have the evidence to show how, over time, the Bible has been manipulated and changed.

[tetralophodon]

First of all, there are 0 count them ZERO mainstream scholars out there who deny the actual existence of Jesus of Nazareth. The only points of contention are those of his divinity, the only people who think Jesus didn't exist are those who make videos like Zeitgeist or The God who wasn't there, which haven't received any critical acknowledgment. or academic promotion. The bible once again has been manipulated, it has changed by only translation and version.

[k87jury]

Actually there are 0 scholars that would say that we know for sure that the person that inspired the character Jesus in the Bible.

[tetralophodon]

actually yeah there are, every scholar agrees that a man named JESUS lived in the FIRST CENTURY in ISREAL. go do some research

[tetralophodon]

Look at the dead sea scrolls, which were put at either the same time or before the original versions of the bible, and such versions as the NAB and the NRSV are accurate down to the punctuation, there are no manipulations, sorry who you have been taught by, but you were lied to

and the reason why Jesus was taken seriously, because he performed a little thing called miracles he died on a cross and was resurrected, thats why some people took him a little seriously, & why people died in his name

[k87jury]

Except there are more then 12 books found in the dead sea scrolls "written" by Moses that were edited out of the old testament and that the dead sea scrolls does not help validate the New Testament, also known as your section.

[tetralophodon]

the dead sea scrolls are a manuscript of the old testament, and only prove that the bible hasnt been tampered with, do you even know what you are talking about?

[k87jury]

And to your second part, HA HA HA

And once again the last defense of the unrealistic fundie. You know nothing about your holy book, and how it has been manipulated over time, you make up excuses like "OH God changed his MIND!!!". Then once you are confronted by someone who actually knows what they are talking, you rely on your faith as an argument.

Just like all other religions, big claims, no evidence

[tetralophodon]

you make me lol, you are an obviously uneducated moron, who has never done any research and only looked at vids by theamazingatheist, or Tf00t, or whomever.

you have been indoctrinated into your world view, and think you know more than me because you can just throw stupid questions at me. sorry, but it doesnt work that way, so get a life, and go to school, so you don't sound like a complete idiot.

[k87jury]

You are the one that make pathetic excuses for your holy book. I actually know about the History of the Bible and about how the universe works. And it is odd when you tell me to go to school, because this is the kind of stuff they teach, you know FACTS.

[k87jury]

Skip ahead to 3:12

watch?v=ft2HrV9i5h4

[tetralophodon]

its also the oldest book in history, has the most number of authors and was the first book in circulation. And has 0 contradictions within it

[thirdLeg]

"And has 0 contradictions within it "

Really? Please tell me you're joking.

[tetralophodon]

yeah im not, sorry to burst your atheist bubble

[k87jury]

It might be the first book to be printed on a printing press, but it certainly is not the oldest writings we have ever found, and there certainly are contradictions. It gives 3 separate rulings on the subject of divorce alone.

[tetralophodon]

well yeah no duh, it was the first book printed on the press and those "contradictions" arent contradictions there rules that were laid down by God for certain people at certain times, there what some biblical scholars would deem "god's excpetions to the rule" there found all over the place we know this, its not like atheists suddenly found this information and showed it to us, weve had the book for some time now

[k87jury]

Wow,... So you claim to be a Christian but no Nothing about the Bible.

[tetralophodon]

was this just a spam comment or do you KNOW what your talking about?

[k87jury]

Yes, I do know what I am talking about.

[Greathiway]

Yeah she should keep the Glasses and Then pick up a any book by Bart Ehrman to see what biblical historians really think about the bible.

[DieHardXG2]

The only things in the bible that are accurate are the vague prophecies of the people, and even then, most of those are the self-fulfilling type. If I saw something about the Higgs boson or a universal cure for cancer, or something about inhibitors for Auto Immunodeficiency Syndrome, I might be compelled to take it as somewhat credible. Alas, all I see is a book about a flat earth run by a supernatural prankster and a Jewish zombie.

[mathmexican4234]

I'll just put it this way. Even if the bible accurately predicted the time and place of every time I took a shit, i still wouldn't believe it's claim of the supernatural. I would still require a manifestation of the divine in this reality.

[Greathiway]

I Wouldnt have needed That much to keep my old faith, I would have liked to have the bible just make sense.

Too many lies contradictions and Just plain despicable Evils to continue to fool myself.

[greycloud24]

you perpetuate the stereotype that pretty women are stupid.

[CDExtra]

second

[mathmexican4234]

Third

[Greathiway]

Matthew 27:52

Do you believe an event like this actually occurred ?

If The Dead rose out of there graves and walked the streets Wouldnt that make bigger news or atleast be recounted in the other gospels?

[mathmexican4234]

Na. A city of zombies is mundane...lol

[HumanStrategy]

Michael Jackson's Thriller! Awesome^^

[Zekkron]

They were all wearing disguise. Duh.

[Greathiway]

First your glasses are cute!

But I think the Quran Makes these Claims much more successfully, since there is only one original copy accepted by Muslims

And Muslim Scholars agree that it was fixed in writing shortly (10yrs)after Muhammad's death and Even translations are considered sinful.

[drpsholder]

One original copy does not make the claims easier or more successful!

[Zekkron]

I agree. Those glasses are adorable.

And you're right about the Qu'ran.

Besides, there's actual evidence that Mohammad existed.

[PeteyIrish]

Excellent!

Yours in Jesus Christ,Peter

[koji123456]

The second commandment says not to make God in an image of anything from his creation from the sky above or from the earth (land) or from the seas, how about people making an image of God in a shape of a man, and yet, make images to this image in the shape of statues, pictures, drawing and movies, amazing people.

[philos71]

Great job!

[WoreyelsMinistries]

Thank you! Thank you for leaving me! You're videos are amazing! God bless you :)

[seantaylor1334]

im glad you made this vid cause i was just having a problem with the authenticiy of the bible. man i cant spell lol

[Tonloc1986]

Atheists and other unbelievers don't have squat! Another great video Kristina! Those are the facts which CANNOT be rationally denied. Jesus is Lord! ;-)

BTW, I'm going to take up a challenge to an atheist in a debate who plans to so call "refute" your "No Ex-Christians" video. He claims that he's going to have the video up by this evening. He's not going to win simply because there is NO scripture or good logic or reasoning that he can use to substantiate his assertions.

God bless! ;)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

lol Thanks! Where would I be without the Lord? ;)

OoOoh lol, and yep I agree with you on the last part.. :) You said it!! God bless!!! :D

[crazypills2]

"He's not going to win simply because there is NO scripture or good logic or reasoning that he can use to substantiate his assertions." - Tonloc

I would like you to explain Heb 5:11-6:12 in context. Don't take one or two verses and build a case. Also, don't use other scripture to interpret this scripture. Simply use the context of this passage.

[Tonloc1986]

Look crazypills2, before I get this point, we need to finish our last conversation. Let's focus on one thing at a time, okay? ;-)

[Tonloc1986]

What? Don't use scripture to interpret scripture? That's how the Bible works. So basically you're saying "You MUST comport to my standard of correct Biblical interpretation." No, that's not how it works. You comport to what the Bible says, NOT your own biased way of interpreting it. I have no more use to reply to anymore Bible passages you list based off this ridiculous reasoning alone. Weak. By your logic, I could propose my own method of distorting your arguments only to my criteria. Please.

[crazypills2]

"What? Don't use scripture to interpret scripture? That's how the Bible works. So basically you're saying "You MUST comport to my standard of correct Biblical interpretation." " - Tonloc

Why would a passage contradict another if the bible contained one position on topics? So, you cannot take the 15 or so verses I gave you and defend your position?

[Tonloc1986]

I know you're blocked on this page, but I still need to make this point for you to see. The Bible is NOT just one book, it's a collection of 66 books. What appears to be on face value may NOT always be the case. It's one thing to defend a position, but I will not defend my position based off an improper standard of the Bible. That's like asking an atheist to defend his atheism based off presupposing God's existence. That's an illogical standard of mine being put on the atheist.

Continued...

[Tonloc1986]

"Why would a passage contradict another if the bible contained one position on topics?"

I'm not sure what you mean about "one position of topics." That's why in theology we use a method of proper interpretation called "hermeneutics." That refers to the study of the interpretation of written texts, especially texts in the areas of literature, religion and law. The Bible was written altogether in Greek and Hebrew, so certain language that may appear problematic can be reconciled in this way.

[stargateproductions]

I can rationally say that there is no god. Give me proof that there is a god but even if you can prove it, I refuse to worship it.

[Tonloc1986]

"I can rationally say that there is no god. Give me proof that there is a god but even if you can prove it, I refuse to worship it."

Then you've already set yourself up for irrationality because you want to be "your own God." You're rejecting God whether he's proven or not, so why should I waste my time with somebody who is not going to believe regardless of the fact? There is no point.

[drpsholder]

He is not rejecting God, if she proves it, he is just refusing to worship it. Big difference.

So, you would NOT be wasting your time, for he COULD believe it, but would just chose not to worship it.

He believes that the tooth fairy left the money on his pillow, but that does not mean he worships the fairy!!

[Tonloc1986]

"He is not rejecting God, if she proves it, he is just refusing to worship it. Big difference."

No it's not. Biblically speaking, choosing not to worship the God of the Bible IS rejecting God. If you understand the teachings of the Bible, you'd know that.

The tooth fairly doesn't even apply properly in this context because of tons of reasons. The biggest one is that the tooth fairy thing was built on a fictional bases. The God of the Bible was NOT.

[drpsholder]

but Biblically speaking does not match reality.....hence your dilemma.

Someone is NOT rejecting unicorns, if someone else proved them, but they are just refusing to worship unicorns.

STop comparing how they came about, when I am showing you the difference between rejection and worship.

[Tladams1986]

Great video. God bless you.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

God bless you too! :)

[kennitala]

there is no synchronization between the sound and the video. but still it all make sense :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Hmm.. it seems to be alright on my end.. thanks for letting me know! :)

[boomya555]

Fantastic video.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Aww thanks, God bless you!! :)

[james46888]

part2 (cont)...the existence of the Christian God), which is why I'm glad you're making vids like this which show both Christians and non-believers who are seeking the truth that the Bible is reliable in this area. Keep up the good work :)

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Aww yes I agree with you on the empty tomb! I'm planning on making a few vids about it! Let the Lord's will be done. His timing is always perfect. :)

Thanks again.. many blessings! :)

[james46888]

Great video. Glad we have Christians like yourself on youtube who are making such vids :). There are IMO far too many Christians on youtube making vids about end-time prophecy and nothing else (that said, I do believe we are in the end-times). Not that we shouldn't talk about the end-times, but there needs to be a balance (prophecy is important, but very rarely do I find Christians talking about the "empty tomb" which is actually one of the best - if not the best - proofs of (cont)...

[KristinaLovesJesus]

lol It was all the Lord's will.. :) I prayed that He lead me to preach whatever it is He wants me to preach, and to let His will be done in my life and here on YouTube. And I guess since many individuals are talking about the end-times, He wants me to put this message out! God bless you, and thanks for all your support!!

[beachtides24]

Amen sister! this is so cool.

God bless you

[KristinaLovesJesus]

lol all the glory goes to God! :) God bless you!!

[ChronicPhilosopher]

Good video.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

God bless you!! :)

[theTRUTHgroup]

There's those beautiful home-made signs I love.

[KristinaLovesJesus]

Hahaha aww, well they're JUST for you! ;)

[AgApE010]

Good job sister, God bless you

[KristinaLovesJesus]

God bless you too!! All the glory goes to God!! :)

[AgApE010]

Amen!