BTW. I am an archaeologist with many years of fieldwork, having seen many geological formations that are remarkably ordered. From a distance they can often be construed as worthy of closer examination and turn out to be non-designed.
Study some field geology and view photos of geological formations that appear to be "designed" but are produced by natural processes plus the foiables of human perception. Your beliefs ate not supported.
Are you sure this isn't a close up of a boot print or something else that pressed into the soil and then lifted up? It looks like a boot print in a dusty surface where some of the dust was picked up by the treads and some pressed into the surface.
it would be helpful to know the scale of this landscape. how was the picture taken? was it from a camera on the surface of from an orbiting vehicle? if from the surface (Rover)- then the scale is just inches- in that case, just what is the author of this thing implying?
The reason we have not made "contact" is because it would be like humans trying to open up a line of dialogue with a turtle. You can talk to him for decades, show him how to do stuff but he will never comprehend what is actually happening. The same goes for us humans and "higher" forms of life, simply our brains are not wired to be able to truly comprehend an advance species. That is why it is so easy to dismiss witnesses as wack jobs. We are dealing with things we can not understand. Much love
As Their World Was Dying. the Surviving Martians Escaped to Earth. Whoever wanted to go and who could adapt to life on Earth Survived here. They Interbred in what way they could ( Scientific Intervention ? ) to keep their Gene Pool going. They added to the Gene Pool of the people on Earth. We all Adapted and Became One Species, Almost. Some Martians left here. We have Drawings of Early Astronauts on Caves on Earth. The Martians erased as Much as they could of their Intervention on Earth.....
@Roadracer987654321 during the pre flood earth the nephelin and humans discovered etheric physics and built (tesla)electric flying saucers.the made it to moon and mars,built temples etc,then died off.in the 1930-40s,von btaun headed a mars mission using the same physics bought fron tesla.the made it to mars and we have been colonizing mars ever since.it nwo only on mars.
Post the source of the photo so it may be scrutinized for evaluation. other than that the footage is worthless. It also begs the question WHY the scientific world has NOT gone NUTS about these 'facts'.
2 da ppl thats say go to nasa an look at the tracks,ofcourse nasa gonna say it rover track its their job to lie to us,and even if it were tracks explain cydonia and all the other places on mars...
Yup. This is the rover track. It was one of the first images put out by NASA when the rovers were up and running. I love how quacks first said it was a Martian foot print, and now this idiot wants to con us into thinking it is alien structures. Not don't get me wrong, I am open minded and believe that life very well once existed on Mars and may still today, but this is nothing more than a cheap reach for attention by a truly brainless retard.
Um, hate to break this to you like SO many have who have studied this for years, but those are rover tracks next to a test hole dug for sampling. You should really go to the NASA web site and see these pictures for yourself as to what they are. Like the moon, Mars is about locating mineral wealth potential and keeping water and past civilizations a deep secret. It's NOT "conspiracy", it's just good Business sense for the corporate-minded.
Ok people are saying rover tracks? I'm trying to get impression of size here, at first glance it looks like structures from above are you saying this is a close up of tyre marks?
you want to see something? go to the kisambo crater on mars and right below it you will see 2 figures that are embeded on the ground. one of a woman and the other of a roman type soldier, and below the womans body you will see an animal like the one in eygpt. you need to see for your self.
im sorry man but thats from the rovers wheels.....your looking at a picture of the soil that was disturbed by the rovers wheels :( ....it not a far off shot from high in the air..its a close up shot of the ground.....just google mars rovers wheels and look at them....its a perfect match :( damn i was hoping it was for real this time....
Please give NASA Photo code number, longitude and latitude and all technical data necessary to confirm what you state as "mars civilization evidence"... or was you who went to Mars and took the picture yourself ?
What is the original source for this pic. We need locations mate without the original source details it could just be from earth.If this pic is genuinely from mars then I am amazed but we do need locations mate cheers!!
I hate to break it to you, but this pic is not of Mars. This is on Earth. In South America. I forget exactly where. Maybe Pumapunku. But definitely Not Mars.
If that picture was really taken in Mars, is clearly seen that it´s a ruin for sure, imposible to believe the Nature did all that, more evidences of at least "PAST LIVES" don´t you think????
I saw that same pic in another video and somebody was claiming it as a footprint on Mars lol I wish people knew wtf they were actually doing with all this bs. Ridiculous.
there is just no way something like that would get slipped by the public.... if that is really on mars and if it is big in size,.. everyone would know about it
No offense, but I'm pretty sure I've seen that exact animation and this pic on youtube, but it was about ancient Earth civilizations or pyramids. It's in my favorites. The structure is MASSIVE, no matter where it is. If its really on Mars, that's proof of civilization. 100%.
I think also rover tracks and how do we know how the sand there is maybe is like dry mud we dont know but it looks similair. if i drive with my toy car at the beach and the marks it left almost the same.
But i do believe in Life on Mars But this Picture doesnt Help
Its like Mokdo68 says, it cant be too much trouble to post references, URLs to this photo, even a google space ref. without that, this could just be an impression of anything in dust!
I don't think they are rover tracks. rover tracks don't get eroded over a few minutes and hours until it made that picture of his own tracks. but at the same time, those are just some strange rocks, just like our own hexagonal basalt rocks, which are pretty fuckin strange, but NATURAL :)
Wow if you look long and hard enough at it , it does remind me of concret (ugh cant spell) maybe? It is very interesting though. is this picture real?
i enjoy space and find it very interesting. are there anymore pictures like this one?
I have posted the answer to many viewers who share with you the same questions. Please look other videos clips if you don't find it here. Look for the videeo clip Miracle - Better resolution photo of Martian Ruins for the best photo.
Looks like the same shape of the slab that lays part in ground and above ground.
in a video I saw before. Only it's HERE, Not there. Now. Just a thought, Could they've been brought here. Or at least a few. Looks like they were about to be cut or they are a floor or ceiling collapsed.
Since I have been working with this photo, I myself have changed on my observation. The last change was made when I received a HD photo that proved, the circle in the lower part WAS not sort of a dome, but a ramp instead. Now I agree with you that the slabs seem to be part of a collpased ceiling.
The last thing you want to do is ask for an academic's opinion about anything that does not fit into the tight little box of theories which makes up their so-called "scientific knowledge".
Academics are impervious to reality.
Academicism is a sham, has been thoroughly debunked and is officially dead for anyone who has freed their minds from it's corporate owned mind control agenda.
nasa is covering up everything of any importance, so why do you defer to them or their opinions?
The moon missions were faked. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". On page 15 there's a partial summary of hoax evidence. It's the seventh post from the top.
After the Apollo hoax, we have to wonder about everything else too.
opportunity - Panoramic camera sol 373: that is a close up of the track of the wheels NOTHING ELSE! Look also at the front hazcamera the same sol 373. You can even see the robot it self making the traces. I'm done i can't explain it better you will have to concider yourself wrong.
I have been watching for thoses pics for years.... believe me (I try to help you)
All pictures taken by robots show at least a part of the robot. This is not the case, as for the archived picture, you can see the other comments where I printed the number of the picture and the location in NASA.
If you look at Mars rovers nasa homesite at the opportunity the sol 373. There is the ref of the pic you are speaking about... It cannot be ruins because it is the footprint of the wheels of opportunity in the sand.
The whole explanation is here somewhere in coments to multiple pasting I have been forced to make to justify what those who su adamantly insist it is a track. I have done all my analises, it is your turn. You are not helping with anything, just trying to discredit this question, as many has done before you.
dude. Sorry, look. I don't know how else to explain it to you. The pictures shows the robot itself making the prints.Hold on i will send you a private message with the links to the pictures.
They're not tracks made by rover, Rovers wheels will leave a different signature print. 1inch if not 2 inches into surface,
Those were crushed, Hit by something powerful Not a rock of matter.
So, My conclusion really is. This a foot print from a take off position, or a step. Leaving the hill print. Or it is what it looks like. A platform or ceiling Failure,
I went to a friends house, I showed him this. Then he showed me some foot prints on the Moon, Which they are very close in comparison, Except what his shows does not have the dome looking part on end. As they bounce and step, They are on the toe end, So this is why the print would be deeper at one end. That is the direction of movement. The dome could be a trade mark for the boot maker.
I am really puzzled with nasty reactions from some hoi poloi, or are they hoi poloi. They do not present any argument, they just go for your throat. What is the real motivation for such nasty attitudes? Bipolarity? Beats me. Yet, it is not for sure a normal reaction. Sonething gives, for sure!
Quit wasting our time with this nonsense. Of course we could all stop viewing your videos and you would no longer have an audience - so think about it.
If this wasn't anything more than a boot print from the lunar surface (which I am positivie it is), then hypothetically speaking, what would have been the purpose of this structure. It appeared to be a ditched covered with long stone slats... what would the purpose of that be?
I forgot to add that the shadows that are seen, have the possibility of being "Placed" there by an agency. They are not true shadows because the other shadows are in all different directions.
This picture has been overmanipulated before it was placed in the wrong archive. To begin with, the intention behind is to tell the public that the huge amount of sphere on the Martian future, was a misinterpretation of the so calle blueberries and the began to dye everything. In this blue period, like Picasso, this photo came up with lots of questions.
Good, Thank you for explaining thngs. Since the picture has been manipulated many times, I gues one could photoshop it to fit their needs. I am a firm believer that there is indeed a coverup about Mars and its artifacts. I also believe that what you have on this video are definate images of construction there by intelligent life. I had other people view this video and we all agree that the layout of the "Buildings" are not of earthly design. Good Work.
Just to play the "Devils Advocate" on this one and consider a possibility. Do you suppose that the shadows were scrubbed out by some "Agency" so it would make it difficult to assess the scale and actual size of the object(s). Just a hint, I am a surveyor and we pay attention to shadow length and time of day. With the picture being taken straight overhead, there should still be some shadow, due to the sun is not directly behind the orbiter taking the picture. Your Turn.
I really recommend you the photo one of the NASA's advocate sent me and I made a YouTube cip out of it. This one - I have wondered how he could get his hands on it so fast - it shows details that I couldn't see before. He also sent another picture that was obviously messed with, especially the shadows. There are shadows cast from 3 diff. places.
Is the one you made a clip out of the 1:31 Rolfruhig2 pic in the upper right hand corner? Also, if it is, it does look like the shadows have been altered. I was taught to look at the shadows the very first thing on any photograph and if they are laying out in different directions, then 9 chances out of ten, the photo has been messed with. Mars would be a better place to come and go from, its not as scary as this planet with its severe weather and earthquakes.
I made two of them, "Miracle - Better resolution photo of Martian Ruins" the second one is "MIRACLE Ruins on Mars Info- Finally!" I was trying to send it to you, but your page does not have contact. Here they do not allow URLs.
thats a very compelling picture and animation,if that is indeed a picture of mars' surface,i for one would be easily convinced of previous civilation on mars.
I can only say, "NASA has the answer. Why don't they release this photo with stats and scales? If this picture was taken by a rover camera, one could see shades, a part of the machine. This is taken from a higher point of view.
I apologize for the remark. But you also came out a bit pedantic. In these posting you have the NASA archive number, so you should have known it was not Egypt.
No. I do not think you are stupid. I checked your channel. It is normal for your age to be jumbo size eager. If your are interested in science you have to train yourself in discipline. And, I would dare to add, SELF discipline. You probably do not take well imposed disicipline, and that is a good quality. Sorry, it was not my intention to insult you, a nasty comment, maybe... no sweat! This pictures has received the nastiest reaction, and not from simple viewers. Some PR do not like to be caught
Too bad they do not print the scale of the picture on the photo, although scales can be adulterated to fool people too. That you said the picture was taken from orbit could mean this structure is huge. We have cameras orbiting our planet that can take a picture of a newspaper and read it and enlarge it. My personal opinion is that intelligent life did exist on Mars, and might still, we are not the only beings in this universe.
I've had a fair share of both archeology and palentology training, some people may dismiss this as an enlarged boot print, or the rovers tracks. If this is a large scale picture, then that is defintely intelligent construction. What is the scale of this picture?
yes its simple erosion from something of equivalent power of a Nuclear weapon, looking at the color pics of Cydonia I would say it was torched, there are other areas that seem in much better shape, but Cydonia must have been an amazing city in its heyday, beach front property to! blame it on the Aunaki
Yes, just tell me how do you measure the size of these supposed blueberries? NASA has the habit of not publishing a distance scale on the pictures they release. They are "granules" as large as 10 kilometers diameter as show in ESA pictures with scales. And how about the four house-looking structures with three doors each? Can you explain rover made a track with such distinction.
BTW. I am an archaeologist with many years of fieldwork, having seen many geological formations that are remarkably ordered. From a distance they can often be construed as worthy of closer examination and turn out to be non-designed.
mspitzer33 1 day ago
Study some field geology and view photos of geological formations that appear to be "designed" but are produced by natural processes plus the foiables of human perception. Your beliefs ate not supported.
mspitzer33 1 day ago
Esto es artificial a todas luces. No hace falta ser muy listo para darse cuenta.
TrueHamal 1 week ago
footprint
nozzal1 2 weeks ago
rover weel print ... godbye!
JORGECINFEXION 3 weeks ago
Post the original link to pictures like this if you want answers and credibility.
freedomination2 1 month ago
Are you sure this isn't a close up of a boot print or something else that pressed into the soil and then lifted up? It looks like a boot print in a dusty surface where some of the dust was picked up by the treads and some pressed into the surface.
bradsommers1961 1 month ago
@bradsommers1961 yeah, you're probably right. I'm sure I can see a print of Dr Martens in there.
peloquin1979 1 month ago
its a moon both u prik..
korsor79 1 month ago
how do we know this is mars? source?
ZacMacTV 1 month ago
looks to be a boot print from the moon.
Yesman0385 2 months ago
it would be helpful to know the scale of this landscape. how was the picture taken? was it from a camera on the surface of from an orbiting vehicle? if from the surface (Rover)- then the scale is just inches- in that case, just what is the author of this thing implying?
cvlovran43 2 months ago
its only photoshop.
babulena1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The reason we have not made "contact" is because it would be like humans trying to open up a line of dialogue with a turtle. You can talk to him for decades, show him how to do stuff but he will never comprehend what is actually happening. The same goes for us humans and "higher" forms of life, simply our brains are not wired to be able to truly comprehend an advance species. That is why it is so easy to dismiss witnesses as wack jobs. We are dealing with things we can not understand. Much love
tatchiwu 4 months ago
As Their World Was Dying. the Surviving Martians Escaped to Earth. Whoever wanted to go and who could adapt to life on Earth Survived here. They Interbred in what way they could ( Scientific Intervention ? ) to keep their Gene Pool going. They added to the Gene Pool of the people on Earth. We all Adapted and Became One Species, Almost. Some Martians left here. We have Drawings of Early Astronauts on Caves on Earth. The Martians erased as Much as they could of their Intervention on Earth.....
Roadracer987654321 4 months ago
@Roadracer987654321 during the pre flood earth the nephelin and humans discovered etheric physics and built (tesla)electric flying saucers.the made it to moon and mars,built temples etc,then died off.in the 1930-40s,von btaun headed a mars mission using the same physics bought fron tesla.the made it to mars and we have been colonizing mars ever since.it nwo only on mars.
google pentagon aliens pdf
william r lyne on you tube
SHARKREEF2011 1 month ago
@SHARKREEF2011 How and Where do I look into this more ? Thanks...
Roadracer987654321 1 month ago
@Roadracer987654321 search google for ....PENTAGON ALIENS PDF its free or pm me and ill email u the pdf.and watch william r lyne on you tube'
johnathan grey archeologist on you tube
SHARKREEF2011 1 month ago
@SHARKREEF2011 Pleaae, Pleae Send..... Thnx..
Roadracer987654321 1 month ago
@Roadracer987654321 you have to give me your email adress roadracer for the pdf.
SHARKREEF2011 1 month ago
It's a tire track from the rover the camera is mounted on. the camera is pointed straight down to confirm the rover is mobile.
Maxillius 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See,please, my unpublished NASA image of several 6 point David’s star enlarged from photosatellite from Mars planet. It's near of Cydonia face:
webspace.webring.com/people/or/ramonetriu/mars-stars.html
rrriu03 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See my unpublished NASA image of several 6 point David’s star enlarged from photosatellite from Mars planet. It's near of Cydonia face:
webspace.webring.com/people/or/ramonetriu/estrellasdemarte.html
rrriu 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
See my unpublished NASA image of several 6 point David’s star enlarged from photosatellite from Mars planet. It's near of Cydonia face:
webspace.webring.com/people/or/ramonetriu/estrellasdemarte.html
rrriu 5 months ago
ITS CALLED A FOOT PRINT UP CLOSE...JEEZ
joeywyatt13118 6 months ago
early chinese toilets when they were constructing the railways.
rolexinSydney 6 months ago
Tracks from my M1A1on a Top Secret mission to take out the Martian Taliban..... (0_O) (.) (.)
greed2112 6 months ago 2
watch?v=NnsgbTPEqyA
marslove12345 6 months ago
yeah its a rover mark
PrincessLeighful 6 months ago
clearly rover marks.. you are a complete idiot
telos611 7 months ago
How do we believe the pic is Mars?
opportunityelectroni 7 months ago
Yup ... It is a track from the rover's wheel ... only inches, from top to bottom.
... Or ... A tiny tiny martian Ruins ... Polly-Pocket sized ... I see a little swimming pool !
phrankus2009 7 months ago
boot print taken with iphone? or android?
JPBeViL 8 months ago
Post the source of the photo so it may be scrutinized for evaluation. other than that the footage is worthless. It also begs the question WHY the scientific world has NOT gone NUTS about these 'facts'.
DeVizardofOZ 8 months ago
um can anyone see a boot print????
jlb6262 8 months ago
2 da ppl thats say go to nasa an look at the tracks,ofcourse nasa gonna say it rover track its their job to lie to us,and even if it were tracks explain cydonia and all the other places on mars...
deathcalls4u 9 months ago
Yup. This is the rover track. It was one of the first images put out by NASA when the rovers were up and running. I love how quacks first said it was a Martian foot print, and now this idiot wants to con us into thinking it is alien structures. Not don't get me wrong, I am open minded and believe that life very well once existed on Mars and may still today, but this is nothing more than a cheap reach for attention by a truly brainless retard.
LorDraconis 9 months ago
How about a link to the original nasa image?
bocin1 9 months ago
Um, hate to break this to you like SO many have who have studied this for years, but those are rover tracks next to a test hole dug for sampling. You should really go to the NASA web site and see these pictures for yourself as to what they are. Like the moon, Mars is about locating mineral wealth potential and keeping water and past civilizations a deep secret. It's NOT "conspiracy", it's just good Business sense for the corporate-minded.
transientdreams 9 months ago
Ok people are saying rover tracks? I'm trying to get impression of size here, at first glance it looks like structures from above are you saying this is a close up of tyre marks?
kevkongable 9 months ago
Mars rover tracks.
ardwlf 10 months ago
you want to see something? go to the kisambo crater on mars and right below it you will see 2 figures that are embeded on the ground. one of a woman and the other of a roman type soldier, and below the womans body you will see an animal like the one in eygpt. you need to see for your self.
fortizist 10 months ago
im sorry man but thats from the rovers wheels.....your looking at a picture of the soil that was disturbed by the rovers wheels :( ....it not a far off shot from high in the air..its a close up shot of the ground.....just google mars rovers wheels and look at them....its a perfect match :( damn i was hoping it was for real this time....
NWM11Bravo 10 months ago
at first glance I misstook this picture for that famous boot print on the moon
Maheekun 11 months ago
Please give NASA Photo code number, longitude and latitude and all technical data necessary to confirm what you state as "mars civilization evidence"... or was you who went to Mars and took the picture yourself ?
terfle1106 11 months ago
these are DEFINITELY artificial !! Made by Rover's wheels... Just delete this video please...
rampartmark 11 months ago
wow look the buildings are just tracks
geminirat60 11 months ago
What is the original source for this pic. We need locations mate without the original source details it could just be from earth.If this pic is genuinely from mars then I am amazed but we do need locations mate cheers!!
bishlives 1 year ago
Rover track or shoes print..lol
AltecIV 1 year ago
if you look at the way the spacesuit boots are made, and designed youll see its a broken boot pring tin the powdery glassy sand of that planet
leipzchen 1 year ago
this picture is even not from mars it is from one of the foot prints from the moon it is also clearly visible as shoe print
Formula1Weekend 1 year ago
looks like a stone quarry just like the ones in Egypt & all over the Earth to me !!!!!
MrGARETT3 1 year ago
:-[oo0
hansballaballa 1 year ago
Its the caterpillar tracks from the lander you kraks !
LOP
thecoffindodger 1 year ago
This is just plain stupid... how do we even know thats Mars...
bubbyg123 1 year ago
where did you take that pic from?
ezefal 1 year ago
wunder sie finden !!!!
19Zagoris61 1 year ago
Are we sure that the first picture is not the imprint of a boot from the moon landings?
49bobbyk 1 year ago
Скорее всего это какая-нибудь ерунда.
activan2 1 year ago
I hate to break it to you, but this pic is not of Mars. This is on Earth. In South America. I forget exactly where. Maybe Pumapunku. But definitely Not Mars.
bs1174 1 year ago
The right combo of drugs and staring at mars photos will probably cause anyone to see what they want to see in rocks, boulders and sand.
antiazazel 1 year ago
If that picture was really taken in Mars, is clearly seen that it´s a ruin for sure, imposible to believe the Nature did all that, more evidences of at least "PAST LIVES" don´t you think????
cangu1975 1 year ago
print from a moonboot
theNASAlies 1 year ago
First thing you need to know when interpreting a picture --> "What's the Scale!!
Tripside007 1 year ago
this is on earth......
GANGSTAELPASO 1 year ago
crap
brucekirk89 1 year ago
das sind Rover Radspuren und keine Ruienen. du Nase.
guenthernet.de/mars/MarsExplorationRover/Oberflaeche/OpportunityFreedAgain/spuren1.jpg
marspages.eu/media/archive4/mer_rover/opportunity/34endeavourpassage4/Spuren_Sol1817.JPG
w w w da vor setzen.
Jensengard 1 year ago
well if this is real then obviously it's the proof we've been looking for...those are impossible shapes in nature.
GRelated420 1 year ago
what are the co-ordinates of this pic, is it mars?, at what height are you looking from?
mattrix2007 1 year ago
I know ETs are here but i have to say this pic is a hoax. Simply look at all five rectangles, they're identical. This is not even a well done one...
EBMoneyGuy 1 year ago
THIS IS FAKE MOVIE
I'm not archeologist, but I interested astronomi, an this isn't mars syrfface
MrGDK666 1 year ago
rover tracks
harmsworth1 1 year ago
Looks like a Rovers wheel trench close-up. The circular shap might be a drilling hole to investigate surface material.
Now where are the real buildings? I haven't seen them yet.
blOrf77 1 year ago
That's a foot print.
c1zx 1 year ago
In my opinion, and I am no expert, it does look artificial. Those slabs on the left really do look too perfect to be natural.
miatageekscott 1 year ago
Those are rover tracks in the martian soil you tard.
jtp0321 1 year ago
Astronaught's boot print in moon soil.
stu27777 1 year ago
google 'moon landing boot print' and look at the pics. the circle even looks like the print with the copyright logo in the same position. EPIC FAIL!!
johydee1 1 year ago
Mate, this is a close up shot of the track left from the rover's wheel.
It's only a matter of inches wide.
spikeychops 1 year ago
the first pic is a foot print from the astronauts that went to the moon.... hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
chinhhhhh 1 year ago
It's just a wheel track! You really should give the source of this pictures, so every one can see.
jobvindex 1 year ago
I saw that same pic in another video and somebody was claiming it as a footprint on Mars lol I wish people knew wtf they were actually doing with all this bs. Ridiculous.
DocSmiTherZ 1 year ago
Those are rover tracks
harmsworth1 1 year ago
Those are close-ups from the rover-wheel prints.
/facepalm
MrKingElvis 1 year ago
If there was something at mars, then WTF happen?
Not only did the civilization destroy itself, the environment was totally obliterated along to a point of no return!
I hope the same fate doesn't it us!!
RRbattlefield 1 year ago
Rover tire tracks. Thanks for not putting a cheesy audio track on this.
perltech 1 year ago
jeez, google Mars Rover, you will see pics of its journey, and the tracks it leaves behind
CaptainToolong 1 year ago
have a look:
/watch?v=pGGQoVFkRLc
maybe theres really something
soza2000 1 year ago
Just maybe they want us to believe they are trying to hide life on Mars but are actually showing us doctored photo's of earth.
BudPeters44 1 year ago
Those are tracks from rover.
UtherPendragan 1 year ago
You all need to stop taking drugs or get a life lol
s7hobson 1 year ago
there is just no way something like that would get slipped by the public.... if that is really on mars and if it is big in size,.. everyone would know about it
nckey42 1 year ago
that is a either a pic of Earth r rover tracks...
nckey42 1 year ago
fucking lame. rover tracks
jtp0321 1 year ago
86 547 7215 54707 81 five
dialchemy 1 year ago
No offense, but I'm pretty sure I've seen that exact animation and this pic on youtube, but it was about ancient Earth civilizations or pyramids. It's in my favorites. The structure is MASSIVE, no matter where it is. If its really on Mars, that's proof of civilization. 100%.
**Where did you get this clip?
Cheers from NJ
bs1174 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how do u think it takes soil samples.. it s just like a backhoe. unless ur on weed then u might see a city in their somewhere.
tinman842 1 year ago
its called the scratches left over from a rover s toothed bucket arm.. lol how u get alien temples o utta that. one ill never know.
tinman842 1 year ago
I think also rover tracks and how do we know how the sand there is maybe is like dry mud we dont know but it looks similair. if i drive with my toy car at the beach and the marks it left almost the same.
But i do believe in Life on Mars But this Picture doesnt Help
Dreadnought2142 1 year ago
I'm calling bullshit.
okbuilder 1 year ago
Its like Mokdo68 says, it cant be too much trouble to post references, URLs to this photo, even a google space ref. without that, this could just be an impression of anything in dust!
discomjim 2 years ago
Can you link where this photo was taken on mars? If its not a rover track then At least give the URL to the image.
Mokdo68 2 years ago
I don't think they are rover tracks. rover tracks don't get eroded over a few minutes and hours until it made that picture of his own tracks. but at the same time, those are just some strange rocks, just like our own hexagonal basalt rocks, which are pretty fuckin strange, but NATURAL :)
ChronicMist 1 year ago
rover tracks ya gimps
notsoundercoveralien 2 years ago
i'm pretty sure it's the wheel marking left by a rover
DANNOTHEMANNO23 2 years ago
Wow if you look long and hard enough at it , it does remind me of concret (ugh cant spell) maybe? It is very interesting though. is this picture real?
i enjoy space and find it very interesting. are there anymore pictures like this one?
Cheer4FAD 2 years ago 4
I have posted the answer to many viewers who share with you the same questions. Please look other videos clips if you don't find it here. Look for the videeo clip Miracle - Better resolution photo of Martian Ruins for the best photo.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
@Rolfruhig2 could this be a very close up pic of an imprint left by one of the rovers??
Onmetube 7 months ago
Looks like the same shape of the slab that lays part in ground and above ground.
in a video I saw before. Only it's HERE, Not there. Now. Just a thought, Could they've been brought here. Or at least a few. Looks like they were about to be cut or they are a floor or ceiling collapsed.
But nice and does get ya wondering.
Thanks.
Snowman374th 2 years ago
Since I have been working with this photo, I myself have changed on my observation. The last change was made when I received a HD photo that proved, the circle in the lower part WAS not sort of a dome, but a ramp instead. Now I agree with you that the slabs seem to be part of a collpased ceiling.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
The last thing you want to do is ask for an academic's opinion about anything that does not fit into the tight little box of theories which makes up their so-called "scientific knowledge".
Academics are impervious to reality.
Academicism is a sham, has been thoroughly debunked and is officially dead for anyone who has freed their minds from it's corporate owned mind control agenda.
nasa is covering up everything of any importance, so why do you defer to them or their opinions?
77GSlinger 2 years ago
those are rover tracks!
this is BS
skkaa 2 years ago 35
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a little off-topic but...
The moon missions were faked. Google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did we land on the moon?". On page 15 there's a partial summary of hoax evidence. It's the seventh post from the top.
After the Apollo hoax, we have to wonder about everything else too.
Do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".
Cosmored 2 years ago
@skkaa - Thank you. It had me going.
revolutionpm 1 year ago
@skkaa if these are rover tracks why are the "tracks not consistant"
why is the untouched bit in the middle?
weadone 1 year ago
@skkaa
i agree, those are tracks. if you've looked at enough pictures, you would know those are tracks.
straycatftw 11 months ago
@skkaa Agreed Total BS
Ur11 11 months ago
@skkaa
thats exactly right!
LoveAviation 5 months ago
opportunity - Panoramic camera sol 373: that is a close up of the track of the wheels NOTHING ELSE! Look also at the front hazcamera the same sol 373. You can even see the robot it self making the traces. I'm done i can't explain it better you will have to concider yourself wrong.
I have been watching for thoses pics for years.... believe me (I try to help you)
hervevdb 2 years ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
@hervevdb if these are rover tracks why are the "tracks not consistant"
why is the untouched bit in the middle?
weadone 1 year ago
are you sure its not a close up on a footprint?
hervevdb 2 years ago
A foot print? On Mars? I wish!
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Im obviously talking about the robots footprint who took the picture.
hervevdb 2 years ago
All pictures taken by robots show at least a part of the robot. This is not the case, as for the archived picture, you can see the other comments where I printed the number of the picture and the location in NASA.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Simply look at the picture its not hard to see that it is a close up.
hervevdb 2 years ago
where does the pic come from? NASA ref?
hervevdb 2 years ago
If you look at Mars rovers nasa homesite at the opportunity the sol 373. There is the ref of the pic you are speaking about... It cannot be ruins because it is the footprint of the wheels of opportunity in the sand.
hervevdb 2 years ago
Sorry, it is not that simple. Some people have already checked the shadows, etc. and it is not a close up, according to them.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Please tell me how it cannot be a close up.
hervevdb 2 years ago
The whole explanation is here somewhere in coments to multiple pasting I have been forced to make to justify what those who su adamantly insist it is a track. I have done all my analises, it is your turn. You are not helping with anything, just trying to discredit this question, as many has done before you.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
dude. Sorry, look. I don't know how else to explain it to you. The pictures shows the robot itself making the prints.Hold on i will send you a private message with the links to the pictures.
hervevdb 2 years ago
They're not tracks made by rover, Rovers wheels will leave a different signature print. 1inch if not 2 inches into surface,
Those were crushed, Hit by something powerful Not a rock of matter.
So, My conclusion really is. This a foot print from a take off position, or a step. Leaving the hill print. Or it is what it looks like. A platform or ceiling Failure,
Sorry but I don't think it's Mars though.
Snowman374th 2 years ago
I went to a friends house, I showed him this. Then he showed me some foot prints on the Moon, Which they are very close in comparison, Except what his shows does not have the dome looking part on end. As they bounce and step, They are on the toe end, So this is why the print would be deeper at one end. That is the direction of movement. The dome could be a trade mark for the boot maker.
But But that's not concrete..
Thanks again.
Snowman374th 2 years ago
I am really puzzled with nasty reactions from some hoi poloi, or are they hoi poloi. They do not present any argument, they just go for your throat. What is the real motivation for such nasty attitudes? Bipolarity? Beats me. Yet, it is not for sure a normal reaction. Sonething gives, for sure!
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Quit wasting our time with this nonsense. Of course we could all stop viewing your videos and you would no longer have an audience - so think about it.
kelltiozim 2 years ago
sniff sniff, i smell photoshop
pater429 2 years ago
If this wasn't anything more than a boot print from the lunar surface (which I am positivie it is), then hypothetically speaking, what would have been the purpose of this structure. It appeared to be a ditched covered with long stone slats... what would the purpose of that be?
GearzVoNKod3 2 years ago
That is a close up photo of a boot print from a moon walk.
sarahnow 2 years ago
You must have a good IQ
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Boot print, or the track from one of the Mars rovers.
skippythumper123 2 years ago
you are right
concretepete2007 2 years ago
where is this photo from? wheres the source?
governmentcheese411 2 years ago
Haven't you read it yet. Look up.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
I forgot to add that the shadows that are seen, have the possibility of being "Placed" there by an agency. They are not true shadows because the other shadows are in all different directions.
Grey9man 2 years ago
This picture has been overmanipulated before it was placed in the wrong archive. To begin with, the intention behind is to tell the public that the huge amount of sphere on the Martian future, was a misinterpretation of the so calle blueberries and the began to dye everything. In this blue period, like Picasso, this photo came up with lots of questions.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Good, Thank you for explaining thngs. Since the picture has been manipulated many times, I gues one could photoshop it to fit their needs. I am a firm believer that there is indeed a coverup about Mars and its artifacts. I also believe that what you have on this video are definate images of construction there by intelligent life. I had other people view this video and we all agree that the layout of the "Buildings" are not of earthly design. Good Work.
Grey9man 2 years ago
Just to play the "Devils Advocate" on this one and consider a possibility. Do you suppose that the shadows were scrubbed out by some "Agency" so it would make it difficult to assess the scale and actual size of the object(s). Just a hint, I am a surveyor and we pay attention to shadow length and time of day. With the picture being taken straight overhead, there should still be some shadow, due to the sun is not directly behind the orbiter taking the picture. Your Turn.
Grey9man 2 years ago
I really recommend you the photo one of the NASA's advocate sent me and I made a YouTube cip out of it. This one - I have wondered how he could get his hands on it so fast - it shows details that I couldn't see before. He also sent another picture that was obviously messed with, especially the shadows. There are shadows cast from 3 diff. places.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Is the one you made a clip out of the 1:31 Rolfruhig2 pic in the upper right hand corner? Also, if it is, it does look like the shadows have been altered. I was taught to look at the shadows the very first thing on any photograph and if they are laying out in different directions, then 9 chances out of ten, the photo has been messed with. Mars would be a better place to come and go from, its not as scary as this planet with its severe weather and earthquakes.
Grey9man 2 years ago
I made two of them, "Miracle - Better resolution photo of Martian Ruins" the second one is "MIRACLE Ruins on Mars Info- Finally!" I was trying to send it to you, but your page does not have contact. Here they do not allow URLs.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
thats a very compelling picture and animation,if that is indeed a picture of mars' surface,i for one would be easily convinced of previous civilation on mars.
jonnyasprin 2 years ago
I can only say, "NASA has the answer. Why don't they release this photo with stats and scales? If this picture was taken by a rover camera, one could see shades, a part of the machine. This is taken from a higher point of view.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
no way! do you have coordinates? I'm afraid this might just be a black and white picture of something in egypt :/
JohnnyRadiohead 2 years ago
Read the postings please and do your own homework, if your are smart, that is.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
"if i'm smart?" i asked a simple question. You have no valid reason to insult me.
JohnnyRadiohead 2 years ago
I apologize for the remark. But you also came out a bit pedantic. In these posting you have the NASA archive number, so you should have known it was not Egypt.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
You mean in the comments? are you talking about the 1P161307098EFF42DIP2551L4M thing? I've never used archives before so I'm basically lost.
JohnnyRadiohead 2 years ago
Go to the NASA page and use their FIND function.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
okay thanks, and yeah, i guess i am stupid xD.
JohnnyRadiohead 2 years ago
No. I do not think you are stupid. I checked your channel. It is normal for your age to be jumbo size eager. If your are interested in science you have to train yourself in discipline. And, I would dare to add, SELF discipline. You probably do not take well imposed disicipline, and that is a good quality. Sorry, it was not my intention to insult you, a nasty comment, maybe... no sweat! This pictures has received the nastiest reaction, and not from simple viewers. Some PR do not like to be caught
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
ESA prints scales on their pictures. NASA seldom does.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Too bad they do not print the scale of the picture on the photo, although scales can be adulterated to fool people too. That you said the picture was taken from orbit could mean this structure is huge. We have cameras orbiting our planet that can take a picture of a newspaper and read it and enlarge it. My personal opinion is that intelligent life did exist on Mars, and might still, we are not the only beings in this universe.
Grey9man 2 years ago
Those Degenerates,anyhow!!!
Grey9man 2 years ago
I've had a fair share of both archeology and palentology training, some people may dismiss this as an enlarged boot print, or the rovers tracks. If this is a large scale picture, then that is defintely intelligent construction. What is the scale of this picture?
Grey9man 2 years ago
yes its simple erosion from something of equivalent power of a Nuclear weapon, looking at the color pics of Cydonia I would say it was torched, there are other areas that seem in much better shape, but Cydonia must have been an amazing city in its heyday, beach front property to! blame it on the Aunaki
desertskymc 2 years ago
Just wind, water and erosion!
pleoj 2 years ago
I can assure you the following:
There are people out there who know these ruins.
Some of these people write denials, jokes, and vicious comments here.
They are people right now saying, "Oops!. Somebody made a booboo!"
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
i bet there are actually people from earth on mars right now, the goverment just isnt telling us it
darthstarwars99 2 years ago
I wouldn't go that far. But I am sure there WAS a huge civilization and it was destroyed I have no idea how.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
that may be, but im just saying theres ALOT of things the goverment is hiding
darthstarwars99 2 years ago
HAHAHAHA
JusanothaUtuba 2 years ago
yep, rover's tracks.
didjabringadidjalong 2 years ago
1P161207054EFF42DIP2551L2M1.JPG
Again, here are where the specs are file, this is a restricted img and cannot be mounted.
This is where the picture without id specs is filed:
1P161307098EFF42DIP2551L4M
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
Those look like really old TWIX bars.
fladave99 2 years ago
Comment removed
Exidor63 2 years ago
this is rover track +scoop marks left by the lander as it travels about.
kunglek 2 years ago
You don't say!
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago
That was my first thought.
tommy8ball 2 years ago
Well judging by the size of sand granules, and the shape and size of the rover's wheels I would conclude that this is a rover track.
AlmostCommon 2 years ago
Yes, just tell me how do you measure the size of these supposed blueberries? NASA has the habit of not publishing a distance scale on the pictures they release. They are "granules" as large as 10 kilometers diameter as show in ESA pictures with scales. And how about the four house-looking structures with three doors each? Can you explain rover made a track with such distinction.
Rolfruhig2 2 years ago