Good Helicopter, but his crew must be high-level professional pilot. Becouse very hardly to fly (control helicopter) , search, track and shot AT missiles and gun... too hard for one average pilot.
People mistake russian engineering for russian populist engineering.
What the army got during communist days was top-grade AA quality stuff (for instance, some helicopter that was active in the cold war days is still today the only trustworthy flying machine to transport people regularly to and from icy parts in Siberia).
Now what they put out for the people, Ladas and all, that was a serious dose of crappola on wheels...
@fescolfaro this is absolutely right... the military was a huge brain drain... putting the country's best minds in military labs, stifling creativity, providing no incentives for innovation, and pumping fortunes into industry while the rest of the world became service-based economies caused the fall of the USSR, nothing else... The Russians were some of the greatest engineers ever.
All truth, except that what you say about Lada... One thing about Lada is worthy of respect, and that's Niva. That vehicle is ugly, spends a lot of fuel, but you can drive it on any terrain and it outmatches any other terrain vehicles. I was stunned when I saw that rescue services use it on French Alps...
@MegaSalajka I beg to differ my man... A friend of mine researched a bit and bought one for off-roading, and it did drive anywhere, but required maintenance after every 3 or 4 trails... He literally had it 1 week at the shop for every 2 weeks driving (with a specialized mechanic). He was a huge fan for one year, f.i. he had a winch and was always towing people with "better" cars out, but after this year he had spent the same as what he paid for the thing again, and had to give it away...
This is the first time I hear that it requires maintenance in such ridiculous short time. But anything's possible... Since I have a Russian selling Russian car parts in commercial part of my property for ten years, I've heard a lot of stories (good-bad) from him and his customers. But I never heard anything like that for Lada Niva. Lets be frank, for every "research" you need more than one "specimen" to make judgment.
@MegaSalajka That's true, and my friend did push it to extremes while off-road. Nonetheless, he was in and out of the shop :) I remember also one time, it was raining buckets and we were driving along some road, he was playing with the car driving it to the side of the road where all the water was accumulating, goofing around saying "it drives on water" until it suddenly stopped. The carburetor got wet from the splashing, so it probably doesn't like water as well. Sturdy yes, reliable no. Cheers
@SCRTpilot The Ka-50 is more than your ordinary combat helicopter. It is actually a fighter with rotor blades in my opinion. In fact, it was created with the idea of it engaging helicopters and low flying fixed wing aircraft, apart from the usual ground attack role.
That would probably increase the size of the choppa. Plus its a single sit, i dont know if a pilot could operate those sistems all at the same in the battle man. But i still in love with this machine!!! YEah!!!!!!
@mizukami999 pay attention to where it is mounted. It is mounted near the helicopters center of mass, so that it's recoil doesn't "turn" the helicopter.
The same gun is mounted on the Russian Mi-28 Havoc on a ordinary nose turret, with the result of achieving 4 times less shooting accuracy, when compared to the Ka-50.
This is possible only on heavy overlimits. They lost two Ka-50s during test, because pilots tried to put this bird over it's speed and g limits. But all in all I think thats is great helicopter.
To me, my dream would be able to fly on the SU-30, MIG 25 and of course this awesome KA-50 Black shark!!!!!!!!!!!!! today, with around $30 thousand dollars you could do almost just that! Gotta save some fast!!! SWEET !!!!!!!!
It may be made from junk, but I believe it is still the best attack helicopter in the world. In terms of survivability, its far better than any other.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Well, Its ugly...Still...Its Russian...so its probably made from old bean cans and selotape...( i worked on Russian planes aight, I know)And like a high percentage of Russian junk...put up against European or American hardware and it always gonna end the same...A fuckin duck shoot.
Actually that's untrue...Hinds have shot down a lot more supercobras than the other way round. And I happen to like the look of russian equipment more.
it would be like russian roulette march ten pace turn and shoot lmao still no matter what anyone says they are great helo's they pack a punch and if either apeared over the tree line im running for the hills
@livadi9 It doesn't matter what you're flying, if a round hits the right spot, you're falling outta the sky. No helicopter is impervious to gunfire & the 1 that is (total armor) would be too heavy to get off the ground. Whether you get hit or not has nothing to do with what you're flying, it's the pilot flying it that's to blame.
Yep, I read somewhere that 30% of the power on a conventional helicopter goes to the tail rotor. Which mean, this helicopter is about 30% stronger than it would be with a tail rotor. That's pretty much.
For definition of uglinesss, check out any Yank chopper. Like that bent tincan Chinook for example. They should be shot out of the air on purely aesthetic grounds.
The best there are K50 takes only one person to control and it has an ejection seat. Vertical acceleration is twice faster than opponents + it is super maneuverable that is why NATO code name is HOKUM. It is unique among gunships. It is better than western analogs by every parameter. Who ever doesn't agree please make research.
"Please make research," that was a little cocky of you. The coaxial rotor design is more efficient and stable than the traditional main-tail rotor design. But that is where the advantage for the Ka-50 ends. In relation to the latest and greatest the USA has to offer, the AH-64D, the Ka-50 is lacking and would be a better challenger to the AH-1.
Test bed, maybe. Technology demonstrator, maybe. But not actual gunship. And it doesn't even matter, because you can't compare the Ka-50 with the Comanche; the latter would've been an armed scout.
Aren't you being ignorant? Or rather, you get the same kind of answer as the question itself. If you want a professional opinion seek it some where else, where professionals generally leave their opinions and even with that, if you pose a technical question here, an answer to which in reality would be a combination of a top secret information from two countries, then you must be a retard.
trasogus -1rst you dont said retard you said mentally chalenge,2nd you said that because your I.Q ? I respect that! you recognize your mental negligence,3rd a lot of people in you tube are knolageble in several topics you will be amazed-have a good day my cromosome shorted ignorant friend-zombie 173rd soc 18delta
zibbaen-remenber that the most advance helo in the usa is not the apache but the comanche a9 i dont know if is cooler but i know is a very capable craft-seeya-173rd soc 18delta
Yes, the Comanche would've been the most advanced helicopter (although it would've been an armed scout). But the project was canceled in 2004, so we'll never see those choppers in action.
zibbaen-there are several plataforms of the comanche out there.dont quote me but i think like 9 or 10 airborne capable,d.o.d use them as test bed i have the pleasure 2 see 1 and it was a mean package specialy the internal weapons bay awesome-vini-vidi-vinci-zombie173rd soc 18delta
i think all attack helo's are cool but in a "helicopter dogfight" they would prob both shoot AA missles then both fall from the sky lol unless they can move extremely fast
It is currently the most advanced battle helicopter around. Its also the first and only helicopter to have ejection seat. It doesnt need any vulnerable tail rotor.
Go the Werewolf....gotta be careful tho' when you "lock on" to a target, it engages the auto pilot and the whole bird goes gung ho to hunt it down...a little scary at first....
Whats the track title for this theme music playing in the backround?
88mroux 6 days ago
Мудак Мудак Мудак!!!!!!
muzeklijstje 1 month ago
very nice, how much?
SalamanderTalent 3 months ago
Good Helicopter, but his crew must be high-level professional pilot. Becouse very hardly to fly (control helicopter) , search, track and shot AT missiles and gun... too hard for one average pilot.
vmifxster 5 months ago
@vmifxster Coaxials are easier to handle than conventional helis.
Helge129 2 months ago
People mistake russian engineering for russian populist engineering.
What the army got during communist days was top-grade AA quality stuff (for instance, some helicopter that was active in the cold war days is still today the only trustworthy flying machine to transport people regularly to and from icy parts in Siberia).
Now what they put out for the people, Ladas and all, that was a serious dose of crappola on wheels...
fescolfaro 9 months ago
@fescolfaro this is absolutely right... the military was a huge brain drain... putting the country's best minds in military labs, stifling creativity, providing no incentives for innovation, and pumping fortunes into industry while the rest of the world became service-based economies caused the fall of the USSR, nothing else... The Russians were some of the greatest engineers ever.
johntetzel 7 months ago
@fescolfaro
All truth, except that what you say about Lada... One thing about Lada is worthy of respect, and that's Niva. That vehicle is ugly, spends a lot of fuel, but you can drive it on any terrain and it outmatches any other terrain vehicles. I was stunned when I saw that rescue services use it on French Alps...
MegaSalajka 5 months ago
@MegaSalajka I beg to differ my man... A friend of mine researched a bit and bought one for off-roading, and it did drive anywhere, but required maintenance after every 3 or 4 trails... He literally had it 1 week at the shop for every 2 weeks driving (with a specialized mechanic). He was a huge fan for one year, f.i. he had a winch and was always towing people with "better" cars out, but after this year he had spent the same as what he paid for the thing again, and had to give it away...
fescolfaro 5 months ago
@fescolfaro
This is the first time I hear that it requires maintenance in such ridiculous short time. But anything's possible... Since I have a Russian selling Russian car parts in commercial part of my property for ten years, I've heard a lot of stories (good-bad) from him and his customers. But I never heard anything like that for Lada Niva. Lets be frank, for every "research" you need more than one "specimen" to make judgment.
Regards!
MegaSalajka 5 months ago
@MegaSalajka That's true, and my friend did push it to extremes while off-road. Nonetheless, he was in and out of the shop :) I remember also one time, it was raining buckets and we were driving along some road, he was playing with the car driving it to the side of the road where all the water was accumulating, goofing around saying "it drives on water" until it suddenly stopped. The carburetor got wet from the splashing, so it probably doesn't like water as well. Sturdy yes, reliable no. Cheers
fescolfaro 5 months ago
впечатляет
plutonij238 9 months ago
Name of the freaking song PLEASE!!!!!!! anyone.
unitedstates49 1 year ago
Way cool video and love the backround music for this, it really fits!
88mroux 1 year ago
If it would be possible I would fall in love with this machine.
Russian engineering is the best.
SCRTpilot 1 year ago
@SCRTpilot The Ka-50 is more than your ordinary combat helicopter. It is actually a fighter with rotor blades in my opinion. In fact, it was created with the idea of it engaging helicopters and low flying fixed wing aircraft, apart from the usual ground attack role.
Simbirsk2130 1 year ago
BMP-2 gun mounted - awesome
mizukami999 2 years ago
aha! Five tons of recoil
beliy1987 2 years ago
I mean that's munchkin style. I'd prefer a tank turret though.
mizukami999 2 years ago
That would probably increase the size of the choppa. Plus its a single sit, i dont know if a pilot could operate those sistems all at the same in the battle man. But i still in love with this machine!!! YEah!!!!!!
beliy1987 2 years ago
@mizukami999 pay attention to where it is mounted. It is mounted near the helicopters center of mass, so that it's recoil doesn't "turn" the helicopter.
The same gun is mounted on the Russian Mi-28 Havoc on a ordinary nose turret, with the result of achieving 4 times less shooting accuracy, when compared to the Ka-50.
Simbirsk2130 1 year ago
Awesome Machine
j0ker0nline 2 years ago 2
Marxism weapons.
dhulcarnein 2 years ago
looks like the good old apache finally has same competition
brooklyn560 2 years ago
It already hat with the Eurocopter Tiger and the Agusta Mangusta (or so, IDR the name....)
Helge129 2 years ago
only vulnerable spot looks like the rotor post, exterior. Unlike the B.H.k's tail rotor.
88Thyra 3 years ago
excellent music, and excellent images. i really like the way russians design things, i mean in aesthetics terms, not fire power or stuff like that
giftraum 3 years ago 2
They are WAY more creative than US designs. SU-47's wings, Kamov's rotors, the TYPHOON's double hull compared to the OHIO, etc, etc.
NewbeFeaster 2 years ago
thats so fucking dangerous. you can have a blade strike at tumble to the grownd and die.
But dont get me wrong, it very cool.
baroud13 3 years ago
This is possible only on heavy overlimits. They lost two Ka-50s during test, because pilots tried to put this bird over it's speed and g limits. But all in all I think thats is great helicopter.
alexx86hater 3 years ago
This possibility not more possible than single rotor heli will damage its tail ferm
MarshallJukov 3 years ago
Looks very stable
FetidToecheese 3 years ago
looks so badass
johndoe528 3 years ago
my favorite freaken chopper!!
coronapack 3 years ago
It aint come in cheap price!Impossible
hybirdisdf 3 years ago
utyujgj
jalinor100 4 years ago 3
this chopper is amazing! such awesome firepower! but real quick wats name of this song?
dissectionfreak 4 years ago
the music is excelent
dhulcarnein 4 years ago
they should make more of this thing!
illidanwashere772 4 years ago
To me, my dream would be able to fly on the SU-30, MIG 25 and of course this awesome KA-50 Black shark!!!!!!!!!!!!! today, with around $30 thousand dollars you could do almost just that! Gotta save some fast!!! SWEET !!!!!!!!
russiaviation 4 years ago
Great technology ! my dream is to be a russian soldier !
Keikomozona 4 years ago 3
Разработки КБ Камов просто впечетляют Россия Рулит!!!!
ruhackteam 4 years ago
It may be made from junk, but I believe it is still the best attack helicopter in the world. In terms of survivability, its far better than any other.
Cypher200kid 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, Its ugly...Still...Its Russian...so its probably made from old bean cans and selotape...( i worked on Russian planes aight, I know)And like a high percentage of Russian junk...put up against European or American hardware and it always gonna end the same...A fuckin duck shoot.
Please....
dogchoon 4 years ago
Мудак он и Африке мудак, тем более в Англии.
Try to translate.
Fozzi19894 4 years ago 7
Actually that's untrue...Hinds have shot down a lot more supercobras than the other way round. And I happen to like the look of russian equipment more.
nicck 2 years ago
it would be like russian roulette march ten pace turn and shoot lmao still no matter what anyone says they are great helo's they pack a punch and if either apeared over the tree line im running for the hills
TheHunter105 4 years ago
it has superior flight controls, target aquisiton, and firepower. But make no mistake, the Ka-50 is excellent as far as Russian engineering goes
injunjoe390 4 years ago 2
I hope it fights better than it looks
injunjoe390 4 years ago
The Crapache? It neither fights nor looks very well. A bit of Iraqi sand, and doooown it goes.
SovietWarrior 4 years ago 4
A bunch of rebels managed to get one down with AK47's didn't they? God I remember that one the news...
The hind? You can't even dent it with a 50 cal.
nicck 2 years ago
During the iraq war most apaches got hit by gun fire. One was downed by a farmer with an ordinary gun:-)
livadi9 2 years ago
@livadi9 It doesn't matter what you're flying, if a round hits the right spot, you're falling outta the sky. No helicopter is impervious to gunfire & the 1 that is (total armor) would be too heavy to get off the ground. Whether you get hit or not has nothing to do with what you're flying, it's the pilot flying it that's to blame.
Aw0L74 1 year ago
@nicck Bullshit. A bunch of rebels managed to get shot by it, which is no surprise, really.
/watch?v=bEHJc1pTkHc
strizhi.org/pilot-videos/smotr/Ka-50_Chechnya.wmv
Simbirsk2130 1 year ago
How come it got 2 rotors?
illidanwashere772 4 years ago
The dual, oppositely rotating rotors eliminate the need for a tail rotor, increasing performance.
RandomTask01 4 years ago
Yep, I read somewhere that 30% of the power on a conventional helicopter goes to the tail rotor. Which mean, this helicopter is about 30% stronger than it would be with a tail rotor. That's pretty much.
zibbaen 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
One DAM UGLY helicopter....Typical Russian Junk....
dogchoon 4 years ago
For definition of uglinesss, check out any Yank chopper. Like that bent tincan Chinook for example. They should be shot out of the air on purely aesthetic grounds.
SovietWarrior 4 years ago 3
typhical american alwas thinks their crap is the best
TheHunter105 4 years ago 14
This will sound wierd but the Ka-50 was featured in the computer game Hard Truck 2, a trucking game(wtf) as a police helicopter.
Btw what does the NATO name HOKUM have to do with manuverability it is named that because all Russian helicopter are given names starting with "H".
Noha307 4 years ago
The best there are K50 takes only one person to control and it has an ejection seat. Vertical acceleration is twice faster than opponents + it is super maneuverable that is why NATO code name is HOKUM. It is unique among gunships. It is better than western analogs by every parameter. Who ever doesn't agree please make research.
AntonTheRusskiy 4 years ago
"Please make research," that was a little cocky of you. The coaxial rotor design is more efficient and stable than the traditional main-tail rotor design. But that is where the advantage for the Ka-50 ends. In relation to the latest and greatest the USA has to offer, the AH-64D, the Ka-50 is lacking and would be a better challenger to the AH-1.
zxcv445 4 years ago
wont lie this is prob better than an apache
TaNkPsYcoTic 4 years ago
Test bed, maybe. Technology demonstrator, maybe. But not actual gunship. And it doesn't even matter, because you can't compare the Ka-50 with the Comanche; the latter would've been an armed scout.
zibbaen 4 years ago
how does the song called??
mirofo86 4 years ago
kinda old
bigbastarrd 4 years ago
WHat a chopper !
UnCanadienFrancais 4 years ago
the art of how to kill each other
twisted87arab 5 years ago
pizdets the best helicopter around.. my favorite looks sick and kills like a mother fucker. i want one for my birth day
slavatiger 5 years ago
how good will this one perform against an apache or a comanche please dont take it bad just from avionics or performance-weaponry-point of view ??
zombie18d 5 years ago
i think it will destroy apache, it will rape apache.
SovietSpetznaz 5 years ago
this question was made for people with some i.q. or some serious knoleged
my question was meant for the well known not for the ignorant back off-tovarick want to be dosvidania
zombie18d 5 years ago
Aren't you being ignorant? Or rather, you get the same kind of answer as the question itself. If you want a professional opinion seek it some where else, where professionals generally leave their opinions and even with that, if you pose a technical question here, an answer to which in reality would be a combination of a top secret information from two countries, then you must be a retard.
trasogus 4 years ago
trasogus -1rst you dont said retard you said mentally chalenge,2nd you said that because your I.Q ? I respect that! you recognize your mental negligence,3rd a lot of people in you tube are knolageble in several topics you will be amazed-have a good day my cromosome shorted ignorant friend-zombie 173rd soc 18delta
zombie18d 4 years ago
what a complete fuck up!!! we don't need to search for top secret info u moron, we're happy with what we got here, if u don't like it, get fucked!!!!
vexed123 4 years ago
attack helicopters are not meant to take out each others!!!! they rarely are in position to do so anyway.
lominho 5 years ago
They're not designed to take out aerial targets, but they can take AA missiles with them.
But if you want to compare the Ka-50 to the AH-64, the scenario shouldn't be AA combat. It should be air-to-ground.
And I prefer the Ka-50, it's way - way - cooler. Only the Americans think the Apache is cooler, since... well, it's american!! -_-
zibbaen 4 years ago
exactly, these are two fighter helicopters, if we want to compare the performance, we have to measure it the right way... ground targets...
they will never dogfight face to face...
and i like Ka-50 too :)
vexed123 4 years ago
zibbaen-remenber that the most advance helo in the usa is not the apache but the comanche a9 i dont know if is cooler but i know is a very capable craft-seeya-173rd soc 18delta
zombie18d 4 years ago
Yes, the Comanche would've been the most advanced helicopter (although it would've been an armed scout). But the project was canceled in 2004, so we'll never see those choppers in action.
zibbaen 4 years ago
zibbaen-there are several plataforms of the comanche out there.dont quote me but i think like 9 or 10 airborne capable,d.o.d use them as test bed i have the pleasure 2 see 1 and it was a mean package specialy the internal weapons bay awesome-vini-vidi-vinci-zombie173rd soc 18delta
zombie18d 4 years ago
Yeah there was no point to them, with the way UAVs were progressing and stuff.
longbowgold67 4 years ago
Dude I am an American and I love that thing, it could kick an Apaches ass.
Noha307 4 years ago 2
i think all attack helo's are cool but in a "helicopter dogfight" they would prob both shoot AA missles then both fall from the sky lol unless they can move extremely fast
TheHunter105 4 years ago
It is currently the most advanced battle helicopter around. Its also the first and only helicopter to have ejection seat. It doesnt need any vulnerable tail rotor.
My favorit helicopter
B777LR 5 years ago
For female pilots it even coems with an erection seat
Kenzofeis 5 years ago
My fav helicopter
richboy900 5 years ago
Go the Werewolf....gotta be careful tho' when you "lock on" to a target, it engages the auto pilot and the whole bird goes gung ho to hunt it down...a little scary at first....
baddbradd 5 years ago