No Im not racist, but it is obvious that in places like Africa there needs to be a reduction of mouths to feed. The humane way to do this is to stop too many people from being born in the first place.
Involuntary sterilization is "the right track"? You're actually JUSTIFYING this? Yes, the population can't grow exponentially forever. The solution is to have the STATE engage in population control? With citizens like you, who needs conspiracies? What the hell is wrong with you?
You seem to misunderstand my point completely; I am using words like may and might and using it in only one or two places where overpopulation is an obvious problem. Like china for example.
No I don't misunderstand... You use words like "you want to allow overpopulation", and "breeding like rabbits" so don't try to walk back from that. On the other hand, at least you are trying - means that you might have some shame left. Maybe there is hope for you.
You are a hypocrite, and your [current] views disgust me. Have a nice life.
The global warming question that has now been termed climate change will never be solved by human beings. CO2 is not the cause and is at best an additive factor. The cap and trade system is simply a money grab by the government and an industry killer. It doesn't do anything good in Europe and it will not be benificial in the USA. You want to get rid of CO2? Plant CO2 scrubbers/trees.
The problem with your idea that people need to be financially able to have children is that the world has gone the other way with poor people generally having more babies than affluent people.
I don't understand that lack of thought about the future myself, but actually making laws to solve the problem has only successfully been done in China. I don't know about you, but I do not want to live in China.
Only an idiot would suggest that because china has done one thing wright, we should adapt there entire system, I am not arguing for that position, I am saying the Chinese in this one area are right.
you know compulsory/forced sterilization is considered to be a crime against humanity. In other words, you need willing volunteers to become nonreproductive. Go volunteer yourself.
The fact is that Every family in the world could live with an acre of land in Australia and they could chose to grow food on that land or grow food everywhere else.
The UN even admits that population problem could be solved if they allowed The third world countries to become industrial countries. Because industrial countries don't have the incentive to have lots of kids because the survival instinct is less apparent. In fact America is having an underpopulation problem.
You do not need to introduce mandatory sterilants to stop people populating "willy-nilly." In many nations the birth rate is below the replacement rate: this is particularly true in European countries, Japan and Australia among others. Having children is a personal choice and should not be controlled, particularly with sterilants. It will be controlled through personal choices and market factors sufficiently.
Im not saying we need to in places like Europe, but in places like china and Africa it is needed. There just isnt enough resources to go around, there isnt enough now, most people live substandard lives, and this can be overted if people just stop breeding like rabbits.
Can you clarifying the "it" in the first sentence? I agree birth control is needed, but I believe measures like condoms are better and retain freedom of choice.
you sound a bit like HITLER wanting to police who has children.........
run out of space??? you sir are incorrect........ every human on earth today can fit in a circle 30 miles in diameter...... every single person son....... you sir are ignorant
You sound like an idiot. Wanting to allow overpopulation.
We are already over populated now, globally, we cannot sustain infinite population growth, there simple isnt enough liveable habitat or resources, one day restrictions will have to come into place
What do you mean "allow"? You mean, there are people that are smarter than the rest of us, whose job is to allow or disallow things? How civilized and liberty-loving of you.
Hey, there's an idea: why don't you go off yourself to help stop overpopulation. Or go get a vasectomy. Apply your theories to yourself, maybe it will help you see them for the BS they are.
Good point, TheLegal. If he's serious about it, why doesn't he show it by getting himself sterilized? It's a little hypocritical to say that OTHER PEOPLE should be sterilized by he, himself doesn't want to do it.
wow sterilize poor people of poor countries like countries in Africa? are you a Racist? its a question not an accusation.
Rangersarrow 2 years ago
No Im not racist, but it is obvious that in places like Africa there needs to be a reduction of mouths to feed. The humane way to do this is to stop too many people from being born in the first place.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Comment removed
R055HP 2 years ago
I never once mention skin colour. please quote me saying we should castrate blacks.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Comment removed
R055HP 2 years ago
my mistake
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Comment removed
R055HP 2 years ago
Involuntary sterilization is "the right track"? You're actually JUSTIFYING this? Yes, the population can't grow exponentially forever. The solution is to have the STATE engage in population control? With citizens like you, who needs conspiracies? What the hell is wrong with you?
somecomputergeek 2 years ago
How would you like it if some government official told your mom it was unlawful for you to exist?
Styles1125 2 years ago
That wouldnt happen, I am only defined g extreme cases, I keep on mentioning shacks, etc.
My parents where workers who owned a house, there are able to support a family. I am not arguing against that.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
You would be hilarious if you weren't so frightening in your stupidity and arrogance. I have no respect for you based on your views.
Good luck being governed by whoever. Liberty is obviously too much to handle for you.
TheLegalImmigrant05 2 years ago
I can handle liberty, but a population like china, is obviously overpopulated, so birth control measures may have to be in place.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Yeah, how nice of you. You can handle liberty for you... but not for those undesirables of course
Pinnacle of civility and enlightenment. We should all be like you.
TheLegalImmigrant05 2 years ago
You seem to misunderstand my point completely; I am using words like may and might and using it in only one or two places where overpopulation is an obvious problem. Like china for example.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
No I don't misunderstand... You use words like "you want to allow overpopulation", and "breeding like rabbits" so don't try to walk back from that. On the other hand, at least you are trying - means that you might have some shame left. Maybe there is hope for you.
You are a hypocrite, and your [current] views disgust me. Have a nice life.
TheLegalImmigrant05 2 years ago
Comment removed
R055HP 2 years ago
The global warming question that has now been termed climate change will never be solved by human beings. CO2 is not the cause and is at best an additive factor. The cap and trade system is simply a money grab by the government and an industry killer. It doesn't do anything good in Europe and it will not be benificial in the USA. You want to get rid of CO2? Plant CO2 scrubbers/trees.
steeleye65 2 years ago
The problem with your idea that people need to be financially able to have children is that the world has gone the other way with poor people generally having more babies than affluent people.
steeleye65 2 years ago
And that is an obvious problem.
If a person cant even feed them selves or shelter them selves, why the hell would any one add a child into the situation??
reckingmachine 2 years ago
I don't understand that lack of thought about the future myself, but actually making laws to solve the problem has only successfully been done in China. I don't know about you, but I do not want to live in China.
steeleye65 2 years ago
It only worked in china because, as far as I know, it is the only industrialised/developed nation to do it.
CONT
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Only an idiot would suggest that because china has done one thing wright, we should adapt there entire system, I am not arguing for that position, I am saying the Chinese in this one area are right.
CONT
reckingmachine 2 years ago
People starve in Africa because globalists worked to ban DDT.
I would love to see your proof that there's not enough resources in the world, without just stating it as if it's fact.
xXLoBaLLXx 2 years ago
you know compulsory/forced sterilization is considered to be a crime against humanity. In other words, you need willing volunteers to become nonreproductive. Go volunteer yourself.
0bodobod0 2 years ago
The fact is that Every family in the world could live with an acre of land in Australia and they could chose to grow food on that land or grow food everywhere else.
The UN even admits that population problem could be solved if they allowed The third world countries to become industrial countries. Because industrial countries don't have the incentive to have lots of kids because the survival instinct is less apparent. In fact America is having an underpopulation problem.
PhilosophyMeditation 2 years ago
u r a mong
mmsayre 2 years ago
u r illiterate
reckingmachine 2 years ago
you are crazy how does things in US affect you.
Prove to me that Carbon is bad!
Rangersarrow 2 years ago
How do things in the US affect me??? Only a simpleton would ask such a question.
Besides who localised my position to America???
reckingmachine 2 years ago
You do not need to introduce mandatory sterilants to stop people populating "willy-nilly." In many nations the birth rate is below the replacement rate: this is particularly true in European countries, Japan and Australia among others. Having children is a personal choice and should not be controlled, particularly with sterilants. It will be controlled through personal choices and market factors sufficiently.
TheYoungLibertarian 2 years ago
Im not saying we need to in places like Europe, but in places like china and Africa it is needed. There just isnt enough resources to go around, there isnt enough now, most people live substandard lives, and this can be overted if people just stop breeding like rabbits.
reckingmachine 2 years ago
Can you clarifying the "it" in the first sentence? I agree birth control is needed, but I believe measures like condoms are better and retain freedom of choice.
TheYoungLibertarian 2 years ago
you sound a bit like HITLER wanting to police who has children.........
run out of space??? you sir are incorrect........ every human on earth today can fit in a circle 30 miles in diameter...... every single person son....... you sir are ignorant
KCUAC 2 years ago
You sound like an idiot. Wanting to allow overpopulation.
We are already over populated now, globally, we cannot sustain infinite population growth, there simple isnt enough liveable habitat or resources, one day restrictions will have to come into place
reckingmachine 2 years ago
What do you mean "allow"? You mean, there are people that are smarter than the rest of us, whose job is to allow or disallow things? How civilized and liberty-loving of you.
Hey, there's an idea: why don't you go off yourself to help stop overpopulation. Or go get a vasectomy. Apply your theories to yourself, maybe it will help you see them for the BS they are.
TheLegalImmigrant05 2 years ago
Good point, TheLegal. If he's serious about it, why doesn't he show it by getting himself sterilized? It's a little hypocritical to say that OTHER PEOPLE should be sterilized by he, himself doesn't want to do it.
somecomputergeek 2 years ago