Caller gets really furious over anti-Winston Churchill author (Talksport)

[yozeroz]

lol

[wygram]

how exactly did britain help poland?

[Redcarpet01]

@wygram Yup, declaring war on Germany but not have any armed forces ready to strike even German ports is a bluff, and itler called it. That's not 'help', it's manipulation.

[wygram]

@Redcarpet01 Yeah, good point! I actually was talking about the warsaw uprising (not the warsaw ghetto rising which was far smaller), and how the allies did nothing to support the poles in their effort. It was a magnificent stand for what they had.. and they kept expecting resources from the allies that never came. However, the poles fled to england, basically saved it by creating the most successful RAF squadron, and then weren't allowed to march on Vday to not piss off stalin..

[dcamaggots]

What does he mean 'we came'? The guy was barely swimming around in his daddy's balls at the end of WW2. Which also makes him utterly unqualified to comment on Churchill's virtues.

[baresolid]

I just spat rice all over the screen, that was hilarious.

[badbubbagump]

Fuck Winston Churchill,he was an anti-semetic opportunistic egotistical windbag....encouraged the gassing of kurds to spread "a lively terror among the natives".He wrote a piece in print about there being "two different types of Jew"..the man was a maggot.

[nelsonr32]

Are you mad? He was instrumental in creating a Zionist state and called Palestinians sub human. How could that make him Anti-Semetic?

[badbubbagump]

Like I said,he was opportunistic.He wrote a piece for a newspaper chastising Jews before he was Prime Minister(look for yourself).FYI,Palestinians are Semetic so to refer to them as sub-Human is an anti Semetic comment.If you wish to believe the cartoonish depiction of Churchill that is your choice.

[nelsonr32]

Not at all, I know the man was opportunistic; his input in the Lusitainia disaster being a good example of which I've read lots. But I suppose the important thing is that he brought the country together when it needed to be.

[spursloyal71]

@badbubbagump

Typical left wing mindless response!

[canegia]

If it was not for STALIN and the german war with the USSR there would have been NO BRITIAN and NO FRANCE AND NO POLAND and Hitler would have won. I think that the western countries starting from Britain and the USA try always to show that they were the key players in this and the fact is that they were not.

[elsblaugranas]

@canegia Exactly...most of the credit goes to the USSR, as the Soviets have lost 26 million ppl between Barbarossa and Aug 1945. I'm not even Communist, but I find US/UK propaganda on this issue appalling

[ENDOFANAGEMUSIC]

@canegia I agree that the main war was in the east but with out British and US aid the USSR would of been crushed :(

[timebandit71]

@canegia Totally agree, I think churchill had great personal courage, but he was also a shrewd politician who knew that no one country could defeat the german reich, and that it would take a combined massive allied effort most of the blood being shed by the soviet red army in anyt case, which by the way churchill and roosevelt didnt give a damn about so as long as they defeated hitler in the process....