@bestamerica TOW is now a very out dated system. It needs line of sight and terminal guidance from the operator. So it would not be a first option weapon for tank killing today. Having said that the TOW carries a big shaped charge. So I don’t think the tank teem would be having a good day or consider it a friendly act. If one did hit them with a TOW. Regardless of what type of tank it was. Also remember you can kill any tank with just a can of petrol if you can deploy it correctly.
Is there anybody know how much it costs for a so called 5th generation "STEALTH" F-22? How much it cost for the still delaying and troubling semi "STEALTH" F-35? How much more it will cost just to keep these expensive crafts in flying condition? I hope the American taxpayers would know the anwsers by now? just to show how transparency the white house is? By the way, why the White house has to be in the hot seat just because some craps just posted on Wililead or something?Tranprarency,MY ASS!
@GODOFWAR1013 are you mentally retarded ? ARMY LAUNCHES TOMAHAWKS FROM 2000 KILOMETERS ! TOW is fired from a tube mounted on a helicopter or a humwee or a static launch pad . Its range is about two and a half kilomteres . Tomahawk is a huge ass missile fired from a ship or submarine to some gay target from giant distaces . It's GPS guided and shit . TOW is wire guided .. their role couldn't be more different . Huge bunkerbusting missile against little AT missile ... you can't compare them at all
yeah, you r right , and that is excactly what I mean !!! and I do stand by my statement of " to smoke any multi-million dollars tanks" by the awesome hand held RGP-29. Take it easy! chaos!
The anti-tank weapons in use right now for U.S troop are to complex, heavy and require some time to set them up while the Russian with their ever more deadly RPG and up to date with awesome RPG-27 or 29. They are so simple,easy to operate, easy to maintain,and most important of all....They are cheap! You can find a dealy RPG-29 for only $500 USD in the black market, and it will smokes any multi-million dollars tanks to the ground, indeed!
@russiaviation The RPG is unguided, short range, and has less penetration, compared to the TOW. They are not comparable weapons as they serve different roles. The RPG is meant to be used by a single person, the TOW by a crew. Furthermore it will not "smoke" any multimillion dollar tank.
@russiaviation WOW your a MORON. don't ever comment on Weapons again. first of all the TOW is a missile not a RPG!
the TOW has a more powerful warhead then any RPG and also has a much much much further range then a RPG and the TOW can be controlled while in flight.
The USA has Launchers like the RPG that can be fired within seconds. like the
@Dogmeat1950 KAKAKA! Read carefully before replying , dumbfuck! Did I ever mention that piece of shit TOW is a RPG! I know what I wrote !!! Just you r the one that jumped to the conclusion without even knowing the whole thing! "DONT EVER COMMENT ON WEAPONS AGAIN"? WHO THE FUCK YOU THINK YOU R? DUMBASS! WHAT MAKE YOU A SO CALLED "EXPERT"? KAKAKAKA!
@russiaviation no you didn't mention the TOW, but you said "American Anti-Tank weapons" which MEANS TOW and every thing else. maybe your the one that needs to learn how to read.
also if a At-4 hits a tank that tank is dead unlike the RPG-7 or RPG-29 which you user may need 2-3 rocket more to take out a tank.
and wtf does kakakaka mean? lol.
as I said you really should not comment on weapons.
and as for the ak-47, well that thing could hit a horse at 500m
@Dogmeat1950 OK! I am "SORRY" for hurting your feeling! HAHAHA! You must be BORE OUT OF YOUR MISRIABLE MIND? Right? I know what I wrote,and where did you read about the so called "American anti-tank weapons" ? Not from my comment for sure, dumbass! Either you were on drug or fucking retarded, and bored little punk somewhere in the U.S of A who just so "SENSETIVE" about making Uncle Sam looks bad! Right? DUMBASS! Did you have some milk today? HAHAHAHA!
@russiaviation all anyone needs to do is scroll down and they'll see what you said. also most U.S Anti-tank weapons are Swedish, Sweden is known for making the best anti0tank weapons in the world.
@Dogmeat1950 I dont give a fuck about "TOW has a more powerful warhead than any RPG",because that was not MY POINT, AIRHEAD! HAHAHA! An old school RPG-7 can give any armor vehicle a run for their money !if the RPG were made by the American as well as the AK-47. People around the world even hear songs about them! HAHAHA! The American Taxpayer aka you too have been robbed for a long time for so many shitty "MADE IN USA" weapon. And of course,"dont ever commemt on weapon" too, you asshole wannabe!
@russiaviation um no. during the invasion of Iraq a American m1a1 Abrams was hit by 14 RPG-7 rockets all fired with 4 mins. the tank had a tred break so the crew got out and got into a badly another m1a2 came up and blew up the m1a1. to prevent capture. the crew was not hurt at all. the tank coudl have been saved but the decided to blow it up.
another systems liek TROPHY stop RPG's dead in the air by simply breaking them in half before they can even hit there target.
@Dogmeat1950 HAHAHA! HER WE GO AGAIN!....! Dumbass! Do you think I really give a fuck about " American M1A1 Abrams was hit by 14 RGP-7"....!!! HAHAHA! Do you know how much it cost for one of your shitty Abram? How much it cost for one "STEALTH" raptor 22? and how much it cost for the still delaying,and troubling and supposed to be flying 2 years earlier "Afforable F-35? hahaha! I bet you have the anwsers, right? or NOT? HAHAHA! little punk, go back to your mom and drink her milk or something!
@russiaviation The one thing russians never admit about the cost of weapons, is that we purchased them all and are still a superpower. They have all their "cost effective" weapons, and their entire system of government collapsed under the weight of their defense spending. Maybe if you guys hadn't purchased all those "affordable" T-72s in the first place, the USSR would still be a relevant force in the world instead of driving their economy off a cliff with their "cheap" weapons.
@M2fiftycal hahaha! Here we go again! "We purchased them all and are still a superpower" ....to whom??? hahaha may be to the country like Iraqi or the so called " Third world countries" hahahah! Uncle Sam is borrowing from the Chinese every single day just to survive,and that are facts! Who r u trying to fool ! This is so halarious ! All you did were just guessing, and that is also a fact ! How pathetic ! kakakaka!
@russiaviation what's with all the "hahaha"? I'm a tank commander on the newest version of the M1A2 SEP v2, and guess what? We can afford it and it's a great tank. It's not as though we have spent money on say 5,000 T-72s and 400 T-90s like some other people have. We spend more money on defense than Russia, but we only spent 4.1% of our GDP on defense in 2009 versus 9.9% from Russia. The fact is, NOBODY on youtube knows how effective the F-22 or F-35 programs will be. There's no way you do
@M2fiftycal hahaha! Do you think I give a F**K about you being this or that! Yeah, America can afford the 5 million dollars piece of crap Abram while it only cost $500 dollars for the deadly RPG Russian made R-29 to smoke your ass to the ground! Can you see how "cost effective" the Russian made weapon are? hahaha! I guess not, because you were dead meat already! By the way, u r the one breaching about "Russia never admited about the cost of bla...bla..bla..!" LOL !!
@M2fiftycal hahaha! You just a damn tanker! What do u know about "defense spending" ! Just please drive the god damn tank! The fact is, according to USA Today, the cost of 1 piece of crap F-22 cost US taxpayers 350 million bucks,and even Pentagon was not happy with its performence! The cost of the still delaying F-35 to date is 120 million and counting when it supposed to be "affordable" aircraft! What a disgrace! But I guess, u just a tanker! just try to save your ass on the ground! Please!
@russiaviation "just" a tanker? I don't drive tanks, I command them. The fact is that NOBODY on youtube, not me, not you, and not anyone else on here knows how effective the F-22 or the F-35 is. What are you trying to argue about? There is absolutely no way you could know anything more than Google can tell you about these systems. Stop reading shit and then passing judgement on stuff. Why try to argue with me over something that neither of us know for a fact? WE DON'T KNOW! Nobody does!
@M2fiftycal hahaha! You got to calm down! now u blaming me about "Stop reading shit and then passing judgment on stuff" while u the one passing judgment on me right now! This is hilarious! You r the one that talking shit and trying to be the shit, but shits are on you, damn fool! If you know that " Neither of us know for a fact" why you still bother to bothering me? Are you bored, tanker! Do I give a S**T about you? No I dont! So please no us in here! OK! Do you get that! I guess not! hahahaha!
@M2fiftycal Please stop guessing,and passing judgment on me! Because its not very nice things to do! hahaha! But I guess, this is life, and of course, there are always fools ,and ignorance bastards like you! Been there and done that! One more fool like you dont make any different! Just hilarious! Get a damn life! Please!
@russiaviation What is with this "hhahaha"? You spoke about M1 tanks, and since I'm an M1 tanker I responded. Then instead of talking to me about something I can actually answer, you said "You just a damn tanker!" and got very insluting. Then you get on this tirade about the F-22 and F-35. Nobody posting comments on youtube knows top secret info about those aircraft. I don't understand your point at all. I may be "just" a tanker, but that's better than some civilain who talks shit on here.
@russiaviation so, just to recap, your position is that America is not a superpower, the F-22 and F-35 don't work and are not stealth aircraft, and America is not being transparent about the money we spend on defense. If there's no transparency about the cost of these systems, then how do you know about it? And how can you prove they aren't stealthy? You can't. Your posts have no meaning and are absurd. You are not making any sense at all.
@russiaviation I have one. Apparently I'm not as happy as you though, because I don't punctuate every sentence with "hahahaha" like you do. Seriously though, if you ever had a point, then you did a terrible job explaining it because I have no idea what you were going for.
@MokomaSusi Roger that,of course NOT,but they just cost TOO MUCH to the point of outrageous! The F-22 Raptor cost 350 million USD,and even the Pentagon isnt impressed with its performance! The upcoming,and still 2 years delaying F-35 is costing a popping 190 million USD when it supposed to be "affordable". The Abram cost around 5 million bucks, but still vulnerable to RPG! It just seems like US taxpayers are being RIP-OFF! and of course, we are always the "BEST" in the world! TO WHO,I wandering?
awesome
cruisingcody 4 months ago
what if the wire is to short?
MrMikeMrMikeMrMikeMr 7 months ago
@MrMikeMrMikeMrMikeMr Then it's beyond the missiles range.
mgibbs88 6 months ago
your misstletoe is no match for my tow missle
originalMOON3R 7 months ago
I HAVE THAT MUCH PROOF IT ISNT FUNNY THE WORLD NEED TO SEE WHAT IM HEARING..
I HAVE MORE LIKE THIS..ALL THE FACES ON MY SIGHT ARE IN MY HOME PLUS IN MY VIDEOS....THE WORLD HAS TO NO ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPERENING TO ME IN MY HOME
stanley03061973 7 months ago
@stanley03061973 Whatever is "happerening" to you in your home is none of our business.
Either way, there would be a little trouble getting us to see what you hear... unless we're all high, but you would have to provide the drugs.
GodOfQwerty 5 months ago
there goes 500k
skateboy159 8 months ago
0:46 FAIL
MrEurgbp 9 months ago
@MrEurgbp yes it missed the target ...
TrMhMt 7 months ago
it did not hit the target
LoboLoko007 9 months ago
out dated sort range junk.
starknight97 9 months ago
'
can this TOW destroy ussr russia T-95 tank
bestamerica 10 months ago
@bestamerica... well look what it did to this t-72, no amount if advancement in armour can protect against that... surely?
nigleman 10 months ago
nigleman,
'
then make more powerful / stronger TOW missile to completely destroy all ussr russian tanks T- 34 to T-95
bestamerica 10 months ago
@bestamerica say what?
nigleman 10 months ago
@bestamerica TOW is now a very out dated system. It needs line of sight and terminal guidance from the operator. So it would not be a first option weapon for tank killing today. Having said that the TOW carries a big shaped charge. So I don’t think the tank teem would be having a good day or consider it a friendly act. If one did hit them with a TOW. Regardless of what type of tank it was. Also remember you can kill any tank with just a can of petrol if you can deploy it correctly.
tina6581 9 months ago
"couldn't be jammed" An exposed filament hanging in the air is like a giant antennae, I'll take that can't be jammed part with a grain of salt.
Zyworski 10 months ago
must take some skill launching that from a chopper :d
rphinks 11 months ago
But will it blend ?
saschula49 11 months ago
@saschula49 im pretty sure itll blend up anything it hits XD
thegr81337 11 months ago
lol props to it missing the target XD
GModPlaya 1 year ago
the TOW II rocks! tell me whatever you want - i've fired some and they worked perfectly.
Cult1022 1 year ago
that sure sounds like George C. Scott......opening statement of TOW missle
InterHaydn 1 year ago
it missed the target !!!!!
envanje 1 year ago 19
Is there anybody know how much it costs for a so called 5th generation "STEALTH" F-22? How much it cost for the still delaying and troubling semi "STEALTH" F-35? How much more it will cost just to keep these expensive crafts in flying condition? I hope the American taxpayers would know the anwsers by now? just to show how transparency the white house is? By the way, why the White house has to be in the hot seat just because some craps just posted on Wililead or something?Tranprarency,MY ASS!
russiaviation 1 year ago
toma-hawk is better...
GODOFWAR1013 1 year ago
@GODOFWAR1013 dude ... tomahawk is a cruise missle and TOW is an Anti Tank Missile .. 2 VERY different categories
Andrismilitary 1 year ago
@Andrismilitary
Dousen't matter tomahawk is still better!
GODOFWAR1013 1 year ago
@GODOFWAR1013 are you mentally retarded ? ARMY LAUNCHES TOMAHAWKS FROM 2000 KILOMETERS ! TOW is fired from a tube mounted on a helicopter or a humwee or a static launch pad . Its range is about two and a half kilomteres . Tomahawk is a huge ass missile fired from a ship or submarine to some gay target from giant distaces . It's GPS guided and shit . TOW is wire guided .. their role couldn't be more different . Huge bunkerbusting missile against little AT missile ... you can't compare them at all
Andrismilitary 1 year ago
@Andrismilitary
*cough* tomahawk is still better! *cough*
GODOFWAR1013 1 year ago
@GODOFWAR1013 yeah . its obvious that you don't know shit about weapons neither armies ... why the hell am I even trying ?
Andrismilitary 1 year ago
@Andrismilitary
Cause' the tomahawk is better! ^-^
jk! I know lot's about war!
And wtf is a humwee?
GODOFWAR1013 1 year ago
@GODOFWAR1013 you know a lot about war and you dont know humwee ? its a HMMWV
Andrismilitary 1 year ago
@Andrismilitary
Humvee mabye?
GODOFWAR1013 1 year ago
@GODOFWAR1013 Tomahawk: Long range cruise missile
TOW: Anti tank missle
They are different.
frenchfrys12 1 year ago
THIS IS A WARNING GET READY TO START GETTING CALL OF DUTY BLACK OPS COMMENTS ON THIS VIDEO!!! U HEARD IT FROM ME FIRST!
marcelobos 1 year ago 17
@marcelobos VALKARIE IN THE AIR LOLS
channeldennis 6 months ago
@channeldennis wow... i wrote a very long time ago :P
marcelobos 6 months ago
@channeldennis your a gay fucking call of duty fan boy
USAmilitarypower 4 months ago
@USAmilitarypower no i have the game but i think it sucks at all so dontfuck with me
channeldennis 4 months ago
@channeldennis than why are you referring to it.i have the game i think it sucks to but i don't go around talking about cod
USAmilitarypower 4 months ago
@USAmilitarypower k but i thought it was fun to say
channeldennis 4 months ago
@marcelobos you just did made a cod and black ops comment in one
PittsburghCopBlock 2 months ago
MORE MORE MORE!
The30calboy 1 year ago
yeah, you r right , and that is excactly what I mean !!! and I do stand by my statement of " to smoke any multi-million dollars tanks" by the awesome hand held RGP-29. Take it easy! chaos!
russiaviation 1 year ago
The anti-tank weapons in use right now for U.S troop are to complex, heavy and require some time to set them up while the Russian with their ever more deadly RPG and up to date with awesome RPG-27 or 29. They are so simple,easy to operate, easy to maintain,and most important of all....They are cheap! You can find a dealy RPG-29 for only $500 USD in the black market, and it will smokes any multi-million dollars tanks to the ground, indeed!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation The RPG is unguided, short range, and has less penetration, compared to the TOW. They are not comparable weapons as they serve different roles. The RPG is meant to be used by a single person, the TOW by a crew. Furthermore it will not "smoke" any multimillion dollar tank.
majikalacity 1 year ago
@russiaviation WOW your a MORON. don't ever comment on Weapons again. first of all the TOW is a missile not a RPG!
the TOW has a more powerful warhead then any RPG and also has a much much much further range then a RPG and the TOW can be controlled while in flight.
The USA has Launchers like the RPG that can be fired within seconds. like the
AT-4
84mm SRAAW Carl Gustav
AT4 AST
and a few other ones
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950 KAKAKA! Read carefully before replying , dumbfuck! Did I ever mention that piece of shit TOW is a RPG! I know what I wrote !!! Just you r the one that jumped to the conclusion without even knowing the whole thing! "DONT EVER COMMENT ON WEAPONS AGAIN"? WHO THE FUCK YOU THINK YOU R? DUMBASS! WHAT MAKE YOU A SO CALLED "EXPERT"? KAKAKAKA!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation no you didn't mention the TOW, but you said "American Anti-Tank weapons" which MEANS TOW and every thing else. maybe your the one that needs to learn how to read.
also if a At-4 hits a tank that tank is dead unlike the RPG-7 or RPG-29 which you user may need 2-3 rocket more to take out a tank.
and wtf does kakakaka mean? lol.
as I said you really should not comment on weapons.
and as for the ak-47, well that thing could hit a horse at 500m
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950 OK! I am "SORRY" for hurting your feeling! HAHAHA! You must be BORE OUT OF YOUR MISRIABLE MIND? Right? I know what I wrote,and where did you read about the so called "American anti-tank weapons" ? Not from my comment for sure, dumbass! Either you were on drug or fucking retarded, and bored little punk somewhere in the U.S of A who just so "SENSETIVE" about making Uncle Sam looks bad! Right? DUMBASS! Did you have some milk today? HAHAHAHA!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation all anyone needs to do is scroll down and they'll see what you said. also most U.S Anti-tank weapons are Swedish, Sweden is known for making the best anti0tank weapons in the world.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950 I dont give a fuck about "TOW has a more powerful warhead than any RPG",because that was not MY POINT, AIRHEAD! HAHAHA! An old school RPG-7 can give any armor vehicle a run for their money !if the RPG were made by the American as well as the AK-47. People around the world even hear songs about them! HAHAHA! The American Taxpayer aka you too have been robbed for a long time for so many shitty "MADE IN USA" weapon. And of course,"dont ever commemt on weapon" too, you asshole wannabe!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation um no. during the invasion of Iraq a American m1a1 Abrams was hit by 14 RPG-7 rockets all fired with 4 mins. the tank had a tred break so the crew got out and got into a badly another m1a2 came up and blew up the m1a1. to prevent capture. the crew was not hurt at all. the tank coudl have been saved but the decided to blow it up.
another systems liek TROPHY stop RPG's dead in the air by simply breaking them in half before they can even hit there target.
Dogmeat1950 1 year ago
@Dogmeat1950 HAHAHA! HER WE GO AGAIN!....! Dumbass! Do you think I really give a fuck about " American M1A1 Abrams was hit by 14 RGP-7"....!!! HAHAHA! Do you know how much it cost for one of your shitty Abram? How much it cost for one "STEALTH" raptor 22? and how much it cost for the still delaying,and troubling and supposed to be flying 2 years earlier "Afforable F-35? hahaha! I bet you have the anwsers, right? or NOT? HAHAHA! little punk, go back to your mom and drink her milk or something!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation The one thing russians never admit about the cost of weapons, is that we purchased them all and are still a superpower. They have all their "cost effective" weapons, and their entire system of government collapsed under the weight of their defense spending. Maybe if you guys hadn't purchased all those "affordable" T-72s in the first place, the USSR would still be a relevant force in the world instead of driving their economy off a cliff with their "cheap" weapons.
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal hahaha! Here we go again! "We purchased them all and are still a superpower" ....to whom??? hahaha may be to the country like Iraqi or the so called " Third world countries" hahahah! Uncle Sam is borrowing from the Chinese every single day just to survive,and that are facts! Who r u trying to fool ! This is so halarious ! All you did were just guessing, and that is also a fact ! How pathetic ! kakakaka!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation what's with all the "hahaha"? I'm a tank commander on the newest version of the M1A2 SEP v2, and guess what? We can afford it and it's a great tank. It's not as though we have spent money on say 5,000 T-72s and 400 T-90s like some other people have. We spend more money on defense than Russia, but we only spent 4.1% of our GDP on defense in 2009 versus 9.9% from Russia. The fact is, NOBODY on youtube knows how effective the F-22 or F-35 programs will be. There's no way you do
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal hahaha! Do you think I give a F**K about you being this or that! Yeah, America can afford the 5 million dollars piece of crap Abram while it only cost $500 dollars for the deadly RPG Russian made R-29 to smoke your ass to the ground! Can you see how "cost effective" the Russian made weapon are? hahaha! I guess not, because you were dead meat already! By the way, u r the one breaching about "Russia never admited about the cost of bla...bla..bla..!" LOL !!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal hahaha! You just a damn tanker! What do u know about "defense spending" ! Just please drive the god damn tank! The fact is, according to USA Today, the cost of 1 piece of crap F-22 cost US taxpayers 350 million bucks,and even Pentagon was not happy with its performence! The cost of the still delaying F-35 to date is 120 million and counting when it supposed to be "affordable" aircraft! What a disgrace! But I guess, u just a tanker! just try to save your ass on the ground! Please!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation "just" a tanker? I don't drive tanks, I command them. The fact is that NOBODY on youtube, not me, not you, and not anyone else on here knows how effective the F-22 or the F-35 is. What are you trying to argue about? There is absolutely no way you could know anything more than Google can tell you about these systems. Stop reading shit and then passing judgement on stuff. Why try to argue with me over something that neither of us know for a fact? WE DON'T KNOW! Nobody does!
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal hahaha! You got to calm down! now u blaming me about "Stop reading shit and then passing judgment on stuff" while u the one passing judgment on me right now! This is hilarious! You r the one that talking shit and trying to be the shit, but shits are on you, damn fool! If you know that " Neither of us know for a fact" why you still bother to bothering me? Are you bored, tanker! Do I give a S**T about you? No I dont! So please no us in here! OK! Do you get that! I guess not! hahahaha!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal Please stop guessing,and passing judgment on me! Because its not very nice things to do! hahaha! But I guess, this is life, and of course, there are always fools ,and ignorance bastards like you! Been there and done that! One more fool like you dont make any different! Just hilarious! Get a damn life! Please!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation What is with this "hhahaha"? You spoke about M1 tanks, and since I'm an M1 tanker I responded. Then instead of talking to me about something I can actually answer, you said "You just a damn tanker!" and got very insluting. Then you get on this tirade about the F-22 and F-35. Nobody posting comments on youtube knows top secret info about those aircraft. I don't understand your point at all. I may be "just" a tanker, but that's better than some civilain who talks shit on here.
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@russiaviation so, just to recap, your position is that America is not a superpower, the F-22 and F-35 don't work and are not stealth aircraft, and America is not being transparent about the money we spend on defense. If there's no transparency about the cost of these systems, then how do you know about it? And how can you prove they aren't stealthy? You can't. Your posts have no meaning and are absurd. You are not making any sense at all.
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@M2fiftycal Hahaha! Bla....bla.....bla....!!! Get a F****G life! seriously! hahaha!
russiaviation 1 year ago
@russiaviation I have one. Apparently I'm not as happy as you though, because I don't punctuate every sentence with "hahahaha" like you do. Seriously though, if you ever had a point, then you did a terrible job explaining it because I have no idea what you were going for.
M2fiftycal 1 year ago
@russiaviation
There is nothing wrong in american weapon sytems.
MokomaSusi 1 year ago
@MokomaSusi Roger that,of course NOT,but they just cost TOO MUCH to the point of outrageous! The F-22 Raptor cost 350 million USD,and even the Pentagon isnt impressed with its performance! The upcoming,and still 2 years delaying F-35 is costing a popping 190 million USD when it supposed to be "affordable". The Abram cost around 5 million bucks, but still vulnerable to RPG! It just seems like US taxpayers are being RIP-OFF! and of course, we are always the "BEST" in the world! TO WHO,I wandering?
russiaviation 1 year ago
the voice is too cool^^
95predator 1 year ago
Comment removed
JBiggs002 1 year ago
didnt know there was a wire between them :O
i hope it wont get tangled somewhere halfway
106640guy 1 year ago
@106640guy i wouldnt say it cant since the helo is far up and its mostly going in a straight line
Basse9419 1 year ago
did Mel Brooks do the narration for this video?
kingspunkbubble 1 year ago
lol long range fishing line casting missile
rrrohan2288 2 years ago
How many Muslims will it kill?
MondoMedia7 2 years ago
I heard over 9000.
ignolan 2 years ago
Iran makes a copy? Maybe their asking similiar question. (:
Type59 2 years ago
tell them to bring it don't sing it!
MondoMedia7 2 years ago
cool
gofuckloser 2 years ago
Nice, finally I've seen the wire on an ATGM up close
sotemot 2 years ago
nice video!
dejawolf 2 years ago