@tucfinland yea i know but it just makes things complicated :P for example the old(2005) C-class 230 kompressor isnt a 2.3L but a 1.8L... etc etc, so u will never know the real thing :P
@reyelacademico correction, a newer version of the most beautiful car ever. The 2008 model looked so much better, it was just right in every way. Have to say, the led lights ruin the look and the front doesnt look as good. And the rear looks american on this one...the square exhausts don't fit with the sleek flowing elegant design, and the centrally placed reverse lights are so wrong. grr, why did they have to redesign a masterpiece?!
The 2011 model is uglier than the 2007 model- Looks as if it has a load of aftermarket trash stuck on it. PIMP MY RIDE style.Those rear reversing lights- why? They belong on flatbed truck. They look hideous. It's got a stupid "LOOK AT ME" nose, with that huge immigrant style Mercedes-Benz star on the front. Save yourself $70,000 and buy a 3-year old example. Instead of making all these unnecessary changes to a largely good looking car they should have slotted the 420CDI engine into the CL range.
@RiiDDiiM i'd disagree with that, mercedes knows it needs to keep its design language changing to stay ahead of the game and i think both generations(2011&2007) are equally as nice in different ways. Not to mention the new one has got new technology and toys. Plus dont make up ur mind until u actually see a 2011 model in person(they arent out yet at this time)
@KenGold666 Don't make you mind up until I've seen one? Who the fuck are you? You clearly know very little about the Mercedes CL- It's been available since September 2010 so how about getting your facts right before posting a comment? This newer model is uglier than the last, it looks as if Mercedes went on a shopping spree on eBay and stuck a load of aftermarket garbage on their luxo barge. Don't state and opinion on something you clearly know fuck all about.
Well, friend, the thing is this, as I see the Euro cars as good rivals to the Japanese and the American cars, I am hugely disappointed with this design, honestly.
I mean, look at that grille. Why fuck it up? Honestly. This car doesn't even know what it wants to be. Like, is it an S class Coupe luxury car? Or a sports car? No one knows.
That car just screams "I don't know what to be, a sports car, or a luxury car."
And what happened was to be a retarded looking like that one. Even SLS is fugly as well, but I guess that's because they stole the chassis of the next gen Dodge Viper and forcing their "Mercedes" design language on that, so obviously that didn't work.
That car just screams "I don't know what to be, a sports car, or a luxury car."
And what happened was to be a retarded looking like that one. Even SLS is fugly as well, but I guess that's because they stole the chassis of the next gen Dodge Viper and forcing their "Mercedes" design language on that, so obviously that didn't work.
That car just screams "should I be a sports car? or a luxury car?" and ended up looking like a retard.
Even the SLS is fugly, I guess that's because they stole the chassis of next gen Dodge Viper and forced their Mercedes design language on it and calling it an "SLS", so obviously it ended up looking like a big retard.
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS no dude SLS was in production way back in 60s. it retains most of the characteristics and its built around that body with a mordern look.
That is exactly their excuse. Let's see, do you see anything Mercedes in SLS AMG? No. Doesn't even look like the Gullwing of 60's.
Try googling next gen Dodge Viper SLS AMG and you would find the sources. The chassis is obviously of Viper, and look at the SLS AMG, does it even look anything like an SL? Look at the way the passenger seat is designed, it looks so much more like a Viper, rather than an SL(SL is roundish and SLS is not) That only just proves it even further.
I mean the part where people get inside. Compare the pictures of the SL, SLS, Gullwing and Viper's side part, you'd see what I mean.
And you might say "Well, Gullwing also looks kinda like SLS AMG", but let me ask you, is the deign flow of SLS AMG as natural as Gullwing? NOT EVEN. It looks more like the car was supposed to be of something "other" rather than a Mercedes.
And yes, SLS AMG was supposed to be the next gen Dodge Viper.
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS ok my bad buddy, but, all they did was use the chassis that dodge was too poor to complete? what you mean to say was, ''the aluminum chassis was developed to be for the viper'' not ''the sls was supposed to be a viper.
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS dooood, The CL is in a catagory of cars called "grand tourers." Grand tourers are high performance cars that are fun to drive but dont make any compromises in luxury and/or comfort. With your logic u could ask the exact same thing of bentley continental GT supersports that it looks confused as to wat its supposed to be
@RiiDDiiM LOL oh really has it been? havnt seen a single one of the new CL's here in british columbia, canada. What country do u live in? If u think this car looks riced out as u r trying to describe it as, u probly shouldnt be driving with such poor eyesight; theyve clearly tried to keep this looking understated. plz point out to me the parts of this car that looks like "ebay aftermarket garbage
@KenGold666 The 2007-2010 Mercedes CL is one of the most good looking cars money can buy, certainly the most good looking Mercedes in recent years (apart from the SLS) This face lifted model looks chintzy, the grill, the daytime running LED's, the rear reverse lights look as if they were lifted from a flatbed truck. It's a car which looks too fussy and over designed. I'd rather wait until 2013 for the all new model or buy a 2007 shape and buy a house with the savings.
the guy sounds like hes giving instructions onboard a airline to fasten seatbelts ... scenery in the background looks more impressive than the car... but like most european cars , it will be riddled with small niggly problems which are annoying
What a beautiful mercedes! The interior is soooooooooo beautiful. Also very fast car! Isn't it perfect? The bad thing in this car is the price... So... almost perfect ;)
@theodoro216 perfect except everyone has one...jesus i cant drive 3 miles without seeing a c63...but an AMG would be nice but it would blend in with the others as much as i wouldnt want it too.
@PhaetonPower Design wise, No Cadillac's will definitely not beat it. Plus Mercedes chassis is a lot stronger than a Cadillac. With Rolls Royce its hard to compare since. Mercedes has a large model selection where as Rolls Royce don't =]
Honestly Id rather have the SLS AMG. Nicer concept car over the more typical coupe. But thats just me.
Steelbullets 1 week ago
My dad has one! Love the car...you don't hear the sound of it's powerfull engine! Impressive...
ILOVEYOU37774 3 months ago
Hmmmm.... 2011 Jag XKR-175 Edition or 2011 CL63 how does a man choose?!!!
AboutMyBusiness7 8 months ago
what's that grey color??? it looks way better than palladium silver!!!
edge160 9 months ago
nice car
timboy47 11 months ago
why is it 63 when it's a 5.5 L engine ?
kounvir 1 year ago
@kounvir ti sbagli, la cl 600 monta un v 12 biturbo 5,5 la cl63 un v8 6,2
SuperCaprone 10 months ago
@kounvir Historical thing I'd say (they did have a 6.3 V8 for a long time back in the days). The last motor wasn't a 6.3 either, it was a 6.2.
250 CDI doesn't have a 2.5 motor either, it is a 2.1 biturbo.
tucfinland 7 months ago
@tucfinland yea i know but it just makes things complicated :P for example the old(2005) C-class 230 kompressor isnt a 2.3L but a 1.8L... etc etc, so u will never know the real thing :P
kounvir 7 months ago
awesome one!
JOHNNYwxw 1 year ago
T-Minus...$133,000 Until Lift Off..........
ArmyOfDankness 1 year ago 3
one of the most beautiful cars ever made
reyelacademico 1 year ago
@reyelacademico correction, a newer version of the most beautiful car ever. The 2008 model looked so much better, it was just right in every way. Have to say, the led lights ruin the look and the front doesnt look as good. And the rear looks american on this one...the square exhausts don't fit with the sleek flowing elegant design, and the centrally placed reverse lights are so wrong. grr, why did they have to redesign a masterpiece?!
WonkyDoodle 9 months ago
I'm sorry why the hell is this guy talking. I'm not paying attention to him this car is too damn beautiful.
abroome06 1 year ago
AMG. noch fragen?
AMG. any questions?
apeson89 1 year ago
when they start selling in USA????
nerasputal 1 year ago
every thing in this car good except look from behind...don't like it
ShallNeverSurrender7 1 year ago
best car in the world
aleksalasica 1 year ago
Respond to this video... mercedes is now truly good looking and awsome interior
toa636 1 year ago
does james may have a twin?!
TheBonaparte666 1 year ago
The Interior of this car will sell itself! Stunning and Beautiful!
luckyceltic69 1 year ago
The 2011 model is uglier than the 2007 model- Looks as if it has a load of aftermarket trash stuck on it. PIMP MY RIDE style.Those rear reversing lights- why? They belong on flatbed truck. They look hideous. It's got a stupid "LOOK AT ME" nose, with that huge immigrant style Mercedes-Benz star on the front. Save yourself $70,000 and buy a 3-year old example. Instead of making all these unnecessary changes to a largely good looking car they should have slotted the 420CDI engine into the CL range.
RiiDDiiM 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM wow really? I think it looks great
mammothborderDC 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM spot on.
ClubYears 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM i'd disagree with that, mercedes knows it needs to keep its design language changing to stay ahead of the game and i think both generations(2011&2007) are equally as nice in different ways. Not to mention the new one has got new technology and toys. Plus dont make up ur mind until u actually see a 2011 model in person(they arent out yet at this time)
KenGold666 1 year ago
@KenGold666 Don't make you mind up until I've seen one? Who the fuck are you? You clearly know very little about the Mercedes CL- It's been available since September 2010 so how about getting your facts right before posting a comment? This newer model is uglier than the last, it looks as if Mercedes went on a shopping spree on eBay and stuck a load of aftermarket garbage on their luxo barge. Don't state and opinion on something you clearly know fuck all about.
RiiDDiiM 1 year ago
Cant wait for the new S-Class.
IPGAuto 1 year ago
so sexy
twin turbo v8...come on
skillz139 1 year ago
a true C O U P E
anurek123 1 year ago
question, If they went back to the 5.5 L, why is it still a 63?
greegarrett1 1 year ago
the last gen CL looked nice, but now this thing looks like a kit car.
Toyota Camry looks 10000 times better than this POS.
And also, more reliable, a lot cheaper and on top of that, Toyota Quality. Toyota Camry hands down =)
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS wow you must really have no taste in cars
GTA4Forever 1 year ago
@GTA4Forever
Well, you want to know my taste?
Ford Mustang, Lexus LS, Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac CTS-V, Nissan GT-R and all the other classic American muscle cars.
I like anything Japanese and American =)
Euro cars = Overpriced. Extremely unreliable. and,
Fugly. Look at this thing, compare this to the last gen CL63 AMG, seriously.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS well i got to agree with the cars you like but seriously euro cars are not bad
GTA4Forever 1 year ago
@GTA4Forever
Well, friend, the thing is this, as I see the Euro cars as good rivals to the Japanese and the American cars, I am hugely disappointed with this design, honestly.
I mean, look at that grille. Why fuck it up? Honestly. This car doesn't even know what it wants to be. Like, is it an S class Coupe luxury car? Or a sports car? No one knows.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS I actually agree with you
GTA4Forever 1 year ago
@GTA4Forever
That car just screams "I don't know what to be, a sports car, or a luxury car."
And what happened was to be a retarded looking like that one. Even SLS is fugly as well, but I guess that's because they stole the chassis of the next gen Dodge Viper and forcing their "Mercedes" design language on that, so obviously that didn't work.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GTA4Forever
That car just screams "I don't know what to be, a sports car, or a luxury car."
And what happened was to be a retarded looking like that one. Even SLS is fugly as well, but I guess that's because they stole the chassis of the next gen Dodge Viper and forcing their "Mercedes" design language on that, so obviously that didn't work.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@GTA4Forever
That car just screams "should I be a sports car? or a luxury car?" and ended up looking like a retard.
Even the SLS is fugly, I guess that's because they stole the chassis of next gen Dodge Viper and forced their Mercedes design language on it and calling it an "SLS", so obviously it ended up looking like a big retard.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS no dude SLS was in production way back in 60s. it retains most of the characteristics and its built around that body with a mordern look.
anurek123 1 year ago
@anurek123
That is exactly their excuse. Let's see, do you see anything Mercedes in SLS AMG? No. Doesn't even look like the Gullwing of 60's.
Try googling next gen Dodge Viper SLS AMG and you would find the sources. The chassis is obviously of Viper, and look at the SLS AMG, does it even look anything like an SL? Look at the way the passenger seat is designed, it looks so much more like a Viper, rather than an SL(SL is roundish and SLS is not) That only just proves it even further.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@anurek123
I mean the part where people get inside. Compare the pictures of the SL, SLS, Gullwing and Viper's side part, you'd see what I mean.
And you might say "Well, Gullwing also looks kinda like SLS AMG", but let me ask you, is the deign flow of SLS AMG as natural as Gullwing? NOT EVEN. It looks more like the car was supposed to be of something "other" rather than a Mercedes.
And yes, SLS AMG was supposed to be the next gen Dodge Viper.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS dude an SL is an SL, a SLS is a SLS and a fucking Viper is a fucking Viper...
vonfred54 1 year ago
@vonfred54
Ya, and SLS was supposed to be a next gen Viper. Too bad.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS so dodge is german engineered now? what the fuck are you smoking
vonfred54 1 year ago
@vonfred54
Google.
Next gen Dodge Viper SLS AMG
And then come back.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS ok my bad buddy, but, all they did was use the chassis that dodge was too poor to complete? what you mean to say was, ''the aluminum chassis was developed to be for the viper'' not ''the sls was supposed to be a viper.
vonfred54 1 year ago
@vonfred54
In the end, it was supposed to be the next gen viper. In fact, Chrysler was working on it, but due to all the bankruptcy crisis, it never happened.
And chassis being Viper means Mercedes saved tons of cash in terms of making an SLS. No wonder why the car is so cheaply priced.
NakedSnakeBlGBOSS 1 year ago
@NakedSnakeBlGBOSS dooood, The CL is in a catagory of cars called "grand tourers." Grand tourers are high performance cars that are fun to drive but dont make any compromises in luxury and/or comfort. With your logic u could ask the exact same thing of bentley continental GT supersports that it looks confused as to wat its supposed to be
KenGold666 1 year ago
@KenGold666 Don't forget to change the oil filter in your 1987 Honda Civic.
RiiDDiiM 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM LOL oh really has it been? havnt seen a single one of the new CL's here in british columbia, canada. What country do u live in? If u think this car looks riced out as u r trying to describe it as, u probly shouldnt be driving with such poor eyesight; theyve clearly tried to keep this looking understated. plz point out to me the parts of this car that looks like "ebay aftermarket garbage
KenGold666 1 year ago
@KenGold666 The 2007-2010 Mercedes CL is one of the most good looking cars money can buy, certainly the most good looking Mercedes in recent years (apart from the SLS) This face lifted model looks chintzy, the grill, the daytime running LED's, the rear reverse lights look as if they were lifted from a flatbed truck. It's a car which looks too fussy and over designed. I'd rather wait until 2013 for the all new model or buy a 2007 shape and buy a house with the savings.
RiiDDiiM 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM maybe you'll like the new CLS that's coming out?
gisenberg 1 year ago
@RiiDDiiM EXACTLY my thoughts sir!
WonkyDoodle 9 months ago
Ostentatious and orgasmicly elegant.....i love it....i want one :)
formula8888 1 year ago
In Australia, the current model CL63 AMG starts at $403,353 while the CL65 AMG tops the price charts at $500,805.
TheMegaCONARTIST 1 year ago
This is such a fabulous car. All my life I am an enormous fan of Mercedes Benz. This is a wonderful video.
cattleman6420012000 1 year ago
haha an amg efficient :P
paultje2small 1 year ago
Comment removed
clarkson1001 1 year ago
I agree. What a beauty!
clarkson1001 1 year ago
Such a beautiful car.
CJAEY 1 year ago
i am so glad i waited for this year.
mammothborderDC 1 year ago
too bad the steering wheel is 4 spoked instead of 3.
and the speedometer aint sporty.
Otherwise this car would be perfect
ganstagan 1 year ago
omg...
I thought 63 remain non-turbocharged...
So it'd be replacement for 55 AMG (old 5,5 L twin-turbo V8)?
But supercharged 55 has been already replaced with 63 naturally-aspired engine couple years ago...
I don't understand that naming...
Campanelli 1 year ago
the guy sounds like hes giving instructions onboard a airline to fasten seatbelts ... scenery in the background looks more impressive than the car... but like most european cars , it will be riddled with small niggly problems which are annoying
haloaum 1 year ago
The European car manufactures are building cars that are bigger, and bigger each and every year. Soon they will be the size of the old 1970s Cadillac.
I hate big cars so I am going to give this a thumbs down.
Nemesis093781 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NFL/NBA/MLB/World Cup ...Jerseys $25
Jordan 1-25 JAF $33
nike shox,max,force one $35
Puma $32 Converse $39
site==== 12usd = net ===
Ed Hardy A&F tshirt $16
New era/Bape caps $9
crocs shoes hot sale $19
zxc110vbnm 1 year ago
nice spaceship
danielzemanfromvdf 1 year ago 27
What a beautiful mercedes! The interior is soooooooooo beautiful. Also very fast car! Isn't it perfect? The bad thing in this car is the price... So... almost perfect ;)
theodoro216 1 year ago 35
@theodoro216 perfect except everyone has one...jesus i cant drive 3 miles without seeing a c63...but an AMG would be nice but it would blend in with the others as much as i wouldnt want it too.
adulby 1 year ago
This is a fantastic car.
cattleman6420012000 1 year ago 2
This car is.....sExY!!
LuxuryAndExotics 1 year ago 2
a mercedes is a mercedes
no car will beat it
never
except cadillacs and rolls royce, they are as nice as mercedes
PhaetonPower 1 year ago
@PhaetonPower Design wise, No Cadillac's will definitely not beat it. Plus Mercedes chassis is a lot stronger than a Cadillac. With Rolls Royce its hard to compare since. Mercedes has a large model selection where as Rolls Royce don't =]
12CJ12 1 year ago
@PhaetonPower Cadillac is very nice and I do like Cadillac but they are not better than Mercedes-Benz.
LuxuryAndExotics 1 year ago
damn v8.... why not v12!
Runandescape1 1 year ago 2
@Runandescape1
fuel consumption..thats why
yury2268 1 year ago
@Runandescape1 because this is the 63 not the 65 lol
ivanlai0225 1 year ago
Looks beautiful. If only I could afford something like this.
JointTaskForce23 1 year ago
beautiful
thedefinitive 1 year ago
mercedes have a huge habbit changing engines lol
luckuly there keeping the V12 CL65
Adelante077 1 year ago
Superb car.
cattleman6420012000 1 year ago
Love it!!! One of the best sports luxury coupe on the market
gunners0077 1 year ago