@JakobiaP In that case I bet you consider magnetism and electricity to be external energy sources as well? When is a force a means of conveying or storing energy and not a source of energy?
@FHomeBrew You mean that gravitational pull is not an external source of energy, a force that is not generated by any component of the system in question? Magnetism is also an external source, as long as it affects the system, the same with electricity
@JakobiaP So if I have a system with a dead rechargeable battery in it and the system can temporarily store energy in it, that'd be considered an external energy source? All the energy the battery gets it gets from the system itself, so no external source of energy is added to this equation. Is the battery then still an external energy source?
@JakobiaP Energy can be stored in an electrical field by creating a potential between two parts (be it metal plates, chemicals or cell-walls). The electrical energy will then always flow from - to + since the electron 'gap' on the + side draws the electrons from the - side through electric potential.
Gravity works the same way but it's through kinetic energy and in this particular machine the balls are like the electrons. Kinetic energy is stored in the height of the balls.
@JakobiaP Do you know about relativity with that explanation that anybody who is accelerated at the same rate as the gravitational force would pull them cannot distinguish both of those forces? Gravitation would be just one kind of way to store kinetic energy.
Also, if I adopt a body with a large gravitational field into a machine does that make it an internal component?
@FHomeBrew Well, if you would incorporate a gravitational source it would be internal, but how ever you define gravity the way to describe external/internal is based on where the force (even though the theory of relativity does not describe gravity as a force) is generated
@JakobiaP The gravitational force has no source. Any two elements of the set that is this universe exert a gravitational pull on each other. So that would make it internal in the sense that it's there, but external if you reckon that only unique parts of the system should be specifically mentioned. Having the system contain an element with a large gravitational field would suffice since gravity itself is already a given.
@drjazzisme Oh I agree it is impossible. It's easily proved because the balls are fully 'charged' with kinetic energy (on the way up) but don't 'discharge' all of their energy back into the system since they're only on the wheel for a really short distance. They lose some kinetic energy along the way without it being used, therefore the machine won't work forever, even in a smooth (without friction) vacuum.
ppl uploading perpetual energy machines are -obviously-, not being serious. I thought your mock about their "practical" use in cars or household were mere jokes, i cant believe how many of you fags take shit so seriously.
Not rly, same rule applies here as in your car. Since the wheels on the 5th speed is higher it would take less energy. But can you actually START your car from a stop on the 5th speed?
this is a good project, it works 100% for sure in the theory but the only problem in pratics is that u have to eliminat all the frictions between the wheel,..polie. and air resistance which make infeasible.
Tretas, simplesmente impossivel de funcionar, além da perda de energia nas diferentes etapas, sendo todas as bolas com o mesmo peso, nunca uma bola poderia fazer a elevação de várias e manter a mesma cadencia.
Work is equal to force times distance. Force in this case is equal to the mass of the balls times the acceleration of gravity (32ft/s^2). If you'll notice the machine must carry 4 balls up the conveyor belt at a time, while the energy generated by the wheel is only carries the force of one ball. Also the distance that the force is used is far less than the distance carrying them upwards. Its a dream. :] problem?
@hwdp89 Actually, as long as we aren't in a totally frictionless system, this has to be the case: Force to pull balls up way < force that they generate on big wheel...
Yo ya habia pensado en algo asi hace mucho el problema es que la energia que generas con la gravedad es la misma que tienes que gastar para subir el objeto, pero usar la gravedad es una respuesta, solo que de distinta manera, esperen a ver mi proyecto Gea.
the friction of this model and of most models will cause enough energy lost that any "perpetual motion" involved is really just a slow lose of energy, this would slow to a stop if it moved at all
it shouldnt work cus there are more balls on the lift then there are on the wheel and not giving enough pressure to power the lift, so it basically adds up as complete retardation.
@frackcha doesnt adding a pulley system change the effort by half? so what you can do is add locks that would prevent it from going backwards like on roller coaster to stop it from ever falling back...i dont know im just spitt ballin
@UniversalHere i hear you mate... using pulleys does affect the load at the cost of using more length on the line... perhaps i was wrong to use 'pulley' it was just to distinguish between the 2 ball risers :)
what i didnt think about, but have now, is the extra torque you get from the wheel on the right because of the distance between the balls and the center of the 'ball wheel'
Im still not convinced it would work, but its good the think about this sort of stuff.. greetings to you btw :D
@frackcha The wheel has mechanical advantage, the two balls are using a lever-like wheel to do enough work to move the other 5. This system would only work, however, if the entire system was zero friction, which is theoretically impossible.
@FoamKittyGamer but you could say the same thing about a simple wheel --it would turn forever if no friction. this is the essense of all these perp. mot. machines -- make it complicated and pretty and it will fool the folks and often even the inventor
@tampicokeed You're being stupid. Don't just say things that you don't understand are impossible, we wouldn't get anywhere if we listened to comments like that.
If this is for free energy; I fear this won't work, 1:1 ratio gears, the weight of one ball is designed to push five balls up? nah... I don't see it happening, sorry.
Let me know though, I may be missing something in there.
what makes this impossible is the fact that you are lifting 4 balls with the belt, using the weight of the two balls resting on the wheel.. maybe if you try to invert the flow of balls it could be easier for it to work
@TheCrampz holy fucking shitballs. a stroke of pure genius.
you should definitely be applying for work with nasa.. a brain like the one you possess could surely crack the whole wormhole mystery in no time flat.
@TheCrampz hahaha, no thanks -- i'll stick with being a garbageman. it's actually a pretty swell job... once you get used to the early mornings. although winter really sucks. you should see the streets here in nyc.. holy hell.
@1wildturd1 Well when people start swearing at you, you can say "I Throw things like you in the dumpster truck, and the best part is i get payed to do it" lol
@TheCrampz that's a good idea... it's surprising how many folks don't realize the importance of my position in their world. i mean, there are so many rude ones out there who say the nastiest things and cast the dirtiest looks; but honestly - if i said something like the dumpster thing you mentioned... i'd probably get a pick-axe planted square in my forehead. morrisania can be a total nightmare...
What is enlightenment?Need to go a little deeper?psychic abilities and powers, it is all possible.THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM It is time to lift the veil.
actually, if you would make the spaces between the first wheel ( i mean the spaces between the balls) bigger and you would make the big wheel bigger and less weight, so there are more balls on the bigg weel then there are on the rubber thing, you can lift those balls on the rubber, because the big wheel will give more force .
But its pretty useless, because it uses so much friction that it even wouldnt lift once.
if the weights were the same and neglecting friction, technically the four balls can be lifted by 1 ball if the ratio of the conveyor pulley and large wheel was 4:1 (larger wheel 4 times larger than conveyor). 5:1 would probably overcome friction and continually run.......hmm
I designed a free ethernal engine in order to stop the 300 men that are trying to make us all their slaves by putting their hands over the entire planet all banks , every inch of land all laws written only serve the richer . You can see my model of perpetuummobile it at : link : = leviathan.host-ed.net =
ESTO DENTRO DE MI IGNORANCIA, Y ES SOLO UNA OPINION, PERO NO ES PERPETUO SINO CONTINUO, POR QUE EN ALGUN MOMENTO SE DEBERA HACER UN MANTENIMIENTO, PARA REPARAR PIEZAS QUE POR EL USO Y EL TIEMPO, SUFRIRAN ALGUN DESGASTE.
@ionutreturns Maybe it didn't come over very well, sorry if I offended you in any way.. I did mean the very opposite ofcourse.. A lot of people I know who know me, find it hilarious when I put it that way.. You must be aware somehow that we are living in a kind of upside down reality.. I must admit it's a strange kind of humor.. I agree with you about the difficulty involved with this vid.. LOL
If everything was perfectly smooth and oiled and no energy was lost in friction then after starting this it would run forever, but even then it's not gaining any energy, and is not perpetual motion.
es buena es probable .... al que dice que pasa con las 4 bolas que suben cuando 1 baja eso se puede hacer con un sistemita de poleas o engranajes como los motore que dan una vuelta y el otro da mas o menos segun los engranajes
has anyone seen 2 guys pull up a piano??? how does that work....pulleys.....1 ball can make 4 balls go up, but the distance that the 4 balls went would be roughly less then 1/4th the distance of the one ball. So this still isn't possible, but clearly possible to send balls up a pulley fewer then whats powering the pulley.
I think he might be right. In this case reduction gearing might not be enough to compensate for the weight and ascent of the balls. Less of an angle would help, but that would lengthen the track and you would need more balls...which in turn would be more weight. So now we're back where we started.
@TheRealEric31415 yeah, but if the wheel is big enough, the balls are at a sufficient distance from the center to gain enough pull, so they lift the 5 balls...it's just physics. it wouldn't work for other reasons (sizes of gears, friction etc)
sure, in the right wheel there is at no time more than ONE ball, while the other wheel (which is powered by the right) constantly carries 4 to greather alltitude.
even a retarded monkey would come to the conclusion it doesnt work :(
this one wont work because theres two balls pushing down the big gear which somehow makes the little thing to pick up 4 balls??? @ balls can lift up 4? wouldn't work. Maybe magnets could aid this. Personally I think perpetual motion is possible. but this definitely is not gonna work.
Еще не надоело? Ну никакой же критики не выдерживает. 2 шарика своим весом должны поднимать целую араву? Не тут то было((
KHTRE100 21 hours ago
Great, Now make a real one.
MrSirPwnzAlot 1 day ago
Cool, what's the music?
tecEErbe 3 days ago
i want make that PM and be reach
and give money to needs in it
if u believe me
sure not
any ways i hope that some day i'll make it
TheBESTterek 1 week ago
you have the angular velocity of the wheel and the pulley different...but you used the same sized pinions...
snillocekim 1 week ago
Fake and gay...
Lol ;)
facebookuser21 1 week ago
Can I have tumbs up for no reason ?
Cubicthing 1 week ago
Just kidding it's more than impossible and it's not supposed to be possible
Sciencedemo1234 1 week ago
I say that this would be impossible because the balls affected by the gravity is less than the balls moving the system as well as lifting the balls.
Sciencedemo1234 1 week ago
@Sciencedemo1234 Thanks for saying that,its exactly what I wanted to say.What he's show is impossible.
drjazzisme 8 hours ago
sa fake
dgslayer08 1 week ago
ionutreturns, It is the most stupid stereotype about Soviet Russia. Believe me, we are all fine except that we are no longer the Soviet
MrNikish777 2 weeks ago
И как колесо под действием веса 1-го шарика будет подымать 5 в это время?
Shuttle969 2 weeks ago 6
Fail ^^
heinrich97 2 weeks ago
ever heard of kinetic and potentially energy?
Domi381 2 weeks ago
no Perpetuum because it uses gravity :V
R94Alex 2 weeks ago
@R94Alex Gravity is allowed. As long as it moves forever on it's own, without an external energy source, it's a perpetual motion machine.
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew Gravity IS an external energy source
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@JakobiaP In that case I bet you consider magnetism and electricity to be external energy sources as well? When is a force a means of conveying or storing energy and not a source of energy?
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew You mean that gravitational pull is not an external source of energy, a force that is not generated by any component of the system in question? Magnetism is also an external source, as long as it affects the system, the same with electricity
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@JakobiaP So if I have a system with a dead rechargeable battery in it and the system can temporarily store energy in it, that'd be considered an external energy source? All the energy the battery gets it gets from the system itself, so no external source of energy is added to this equation. Is the battery then still an external energy source?
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew No, if it's a part of the system it's an internal source, but good luck making gravity an internal source
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@JakobiaP Energy can be stored in an electrical field by creating a potential between two parts (be it metal plates, chemicals or cell-walls). The electrical energy will then always flow from - to + since the electron 'gap' on the + side draws the electrons from the - side through electric potential.
Gravity works the same way but it's through kinetic energy and in this particular machine the balls are like the electrons. Kinetic energy is stored in the height of the balls.
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew The generation of the electric force is internal while the source of the gravitational force is external
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@JakobiaP Do you know about relativity with that explanation that anybody who is accelerated at the same rate as the gravitational force would pull them cannot distinguish both of those forces? Gravitation would be just one kind of way to store kinetic energy.
Also, if I adopt a body with a large gravitational field into a machine does that make it an internal component?
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew Well, if you would incorporate a gravitational source it would be internal, but how ever you define gravity the way to describe external/internal is based on where the force (even though the theory of relativity does not describe gravity as a force) is generated
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@JakobiaP The gravitational force has no source. Any two elements of the set that is this universe exert a gravitational pull on each other. So that would make it internal in the sense that it's there, but external if you reckon that only unique parts of the system should be specifically mentioned. Having the system contain an element with a large gravitational field would suffice since gravity itself is already a given.
FHomeBrew 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrew Internal would require all components to be internal, otherwise we could call an engine powered by plugging it into the wall internal
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
@FHomeBrewI I think what he's showing here is impossible IMHO.Its a computer mock-up But I'll take another look.
drjazzisme 8 hours ago
@drjazzisme Oh I agree it is impossible. It's easily proved because the balls are fully 'charged' with kinetic energy (on the way up) but don't 'discharge' all of their energy back into the system since they're only on the wheel for a really short distance. They lose some kinetic energy along the way without it being used, therefore the machine won't work forever, even in a smooth (without friction) vacuum.
FHomeBrew 7 hours ago
Friction is going to mess it up
TheDragonsword123 3 weeks ago
build it in real life, then ill believe it.
NorthPolePyro 3 weeks ago
There would be no motion.
psychotickable 3 weeks ago
These balls should increase speed while falling.
Leszek1024 3 weeks ago
That's impossible. Resistance is cause of increase of potential energy.
Leszek1024 3 weeks ago
how can the weight of 2 balls lift 5?
JugglingJona 1 month ago
hmm... the weight of four balls versus the weight of one...
PianoMastR64 1 month ago
@PianoMastR64 Did you take gear ratio under consideration...? ;)
omertahistoriamafii 1 month ago 2
physics easily demonstrates that this is an incorrect model.
CepheiVV 1 month ago
Hahaha this is not possible !
smileydm1 1 month ago
3 balls can't lift 5 balls and the weight of the big wheel.
HesseJamez 1 month ago
why the hate?
ppl uploading perpetual energy machines are -obviously-, not being serious. I thought your mock about their "practical" use in cars or household were mere jokes, i cant believe how many of you fags take shit so seriously.
elchapetas 1 month ago 2
@SupahAznDomination yes.. as mentioned earlier.. i still very much doubt it would work..
frackcha 1 month ago
@SupahAznDomination
Not rly, same rule applies here as in your car. Since the wheels on the 5th speed is higher it would take less energy. But can you actually START your car from a stop on the 5th speed?
SilentEliminator 1 month ago
looks legit.
wolflover8765 2 months ago
Ugh that machine hurts my head. Whenever an impossible machine is animated so that it functions on screen, i get a massive headache!
toolworks 2 months ago
2 Balls = 5?
aaroncmx 2 months ago
this is a good project, it works 100% for sure in the theory but the only problem in pratics is that u have to eliminat all the frictions between the wheel,..polie. and air resistance which make infeasible.
saidrahali2 2 months ago
Tretas, simplesmente impossivel de funcionar, além da perda de energia nas diferentes etapas, sendo todas as bolas com o mesmo peso, nunca uma bola poderia fazer a elevação de várias e manter a mesma cadencia.
misterskiper 2 months ago
fuck you with meditation
cptweewee14 2 months ago
Why this won't work:
Work is equal to force times distance. Force in this case is equal to the mass of the balls times the acceleration of gravity (32ft/s^2). If you'll notice the machine must carry 4 balls up the conveyor belt at a time, while the energy generated by the wheel is only carries the force of one ball. Also the distance that the force is used is far less than the distance carrying them upwards. Its a dream. :] problem?
QuantumChance 2 months ago
@QuantumChance that's what i wanted to say!
redmatrice 2 months ago
Force to pull balls up way = force that they generate on big wheel?
hwdp89 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hwdp89 Actually, as long as we aren't in a totally frictionless system, this has to be the case: Force to pull balls up way < force that they generate on big wheel...
JakobiaP 2 weeks ago
Yo ya habia pensado en algo asi hace mucho el problema es que la energia que generas con la gravedad es la misma que tienes que gastar para subir el objeto, pero usar la gravedad es una respuesta, solo que de distinta manera, esperen a ver mi proyecto Gea.
SGRIPER 2 months ago
how are you planning to make the marbles move at the same speed at the same distance ?
7249xxl 2 months ago
no computador ate eu faço
pitfall121 2 months ago
А верхнюю ленту что двигает???
andrey76able 3 months ago in playlist Другие видео от пользователя U7tv
the friction of this model and of most models will cause enough energy lost that any "perpetual motion" involved is really just a slow lose of energy, this would slow to a stop if it moved at all
Nitemare 3 months ago
it shouldnt work cus there are more balls on the lift then there are on the wheel and not giving enough pressure to power the lift, so it basically adds up as complete retardation.
DrAmazingRobot 3 months ago
How is that Perpetuum Mobile ?!?!?
013dirtdiver 3 months ago
one bool up 4 bools obvi no
TheV8arcade 3 months ago
jak moze mniejsza maszyna wiecej kulek wcagac od wiekszej... pchyba to tylko wirtulanie dziala i nijak inaczej
4freeday 3 months ago
You know... this could actually work, if the rotating parts have little friction.
FoamKittyGamer 3 months ago
@FoamKittyGamer the wheel has at most 2 balls pulling down, lifting 5 balls on the pulley...
frackcha 3 months ago 62
@frackcha ya, it should work the other direction :)
RCSiberia 2 months ago
@frackcha doesnt adding a pulley system change the effort by half? so what you can do is add locks that would prevent it from going backwards like on roller coaster to stop it from ever falling back...i dont know im just spitt ballin
UniversalHere 2 months ago
@UniversalHere i hear you mate... using pulleys does affect the load at the cost of using more length on the line... perhaps i was wrong to use 'pulley' it was just to distinguish between the 2 ball risers :)
what i didnt think about, but have now, is the extra torque you get from the wheel on the right because of the distance between the balls and the center of the 'ball wheel'
Im still not convinced it would work, but its good the think about this sort of stuff.. greetings to you btw :D
frackcha 2 months ago
@frackcha indeed , unfortunatly , the people who build this things think that the more complex it looks , the more plausible it would be
1paardenkop 2 months ago
@frackcha The wheel has mechanical advantage, the two balls are using a lever-like wheel to do enough work to move the other 5. This system would only work, however, if the entire system was zero friction, which is theoretically impossible.
hamster8925 1 month ago
@hamster8925 and the left side has a lot.
PawnBACM 1 month ago
maybe the uh.....no nevermind it must use magic.
imjohnnymoscow 1 week ago
@FoamKittyGamer but you could say the same thing about a simple wheel --it would turn forever if no friction. this is the essense of all these perp. mot. machines -- make it complicated and pretty and it will fool the folks and often even the inventor
tampicokeed 3 months ago
@tampicokeed You're being stupid. Don't just say things that you don't understand are impossible, we wouldn't get anywhere if we listened to comments like that.
Cheerios11992 3 months ago
the fun part is , it is actually working !
zombiekil20 3 months ago in playlist Meer video's van U7tv
If this is for free energy; I fear this won't work, 1:1 ratio gears, the weight of one ball is designed to push five balls up? nah... I don't see it happening, sorry.
Let me know though, I may be missing something in there.
TeknoStatik87 3 months ago
just make it and we'll see...
gopalreekoye 4 months ago
i don't think you can lift 4 marbles up with the power of 1-2 falling down.
It's the best Perpetuum Mobile i've seen so far.
thisusernameisable 4 months ago
@thisusernameisable
Couldn't you lift 4 marbles with only 2 using gears? Like a pulley system of sorts, where it multiplies the force?
chrisadmaley 4 months ago
what makes this impossible is the fact that you are lifting 4 balls with the belt, using the weight of the two balls resting on the wheel.. maybe if you try to invert the flow of balls it could be easier for it to work
ac711sk8 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheGreedyGlutton 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheGreedyGlutton 5 months ago
where's the motor
koogyboo 5 months ago
It looks like this one's: watch?v=X3Iwt84dopM
boumbh 5 months ago
it's not a perpettum mobile, because it is powered by "gravity"
MajorLetsPlay 5 months ago
@MajorLetsPlay FACEPAAAALM!
Mariuss130 5 months ago
@MajorLetsPlay you don't know how stupid you just made yourself look.
guitarheroman202 4 months ago
@guitarheroman202 you know i don't care? :D
MajorLetsPlay 4 months ago
Meditation...
Kukumor 6 months ago
..anybody knows the baron munchausen??
adrymetal 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is no way the balls could be heavy enough to spin the wheel, and then light enough to be pulled back up...
cool design though
MegaKittyProductions 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
now tell me how can a ball find the power to alevate four balls. how much time did you waste for that?
sachiboy100 6 months ago
It wouldn't work if the balls are the same weight it would just be a counter balance.
TheCrampz 6 months ago
@TheCrampz holy fucking shitballs. a stroke of pure genius.
you should definitely be applying for work with nasa.. a brain like the one you possess could surely crack the whole wormhole mystery in no time flat.
1wildturd1 6 months ago
@1wildturd1 Your should really get a job encouraging people I'm sure you would do "Great".
TheCrampz 6 months ago
@TheCrampz hahaha, no thanks -- i'll stick with being a garbageman. it's actually a pretty swell job... once you get used to the early mornings. although winter really sucks. you should see the streets here in nyc.. holy hell.
1wildturd1 6 months ago
@1wildturd1 Well when people start swearing at you, you can say "I Throw things like you in the dumpster truck, and the best part is i get payed to do it" lol
TheCrampz 6 months ago
@TheCrampz that's a good idea... it's surprising how many folks don't realize the importance of my position in their world. i mean, there are so many rude ones out there who say the nastiest things and cast the dirtiest looks; but honestly - if i said something like the dumpster thing you mentioned... i'd probably get a pick-axe planted square in my forehead. morrisania can be a total nightmare...
1wildturd1 6 months ago
What is enlightenment?Need to go a little deeper?psychic abilities and powers, it is all possible.THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM It is time to lift the veil.
ErlindaWeiner 7 months ago
@ErlindaWeiner
Enlightenment:
the happier you are, the more irrelevant being alive
becomes
spaceghetto 6 months ago 36
my brain hurts..
animalhunger 7 months ago
actually, if you would make the spaces between the first wheel ( i mean the spaces between the balls) bigger and you would make the big wheel bigger and less weight, so there are more balls on the bigg weel then there are on the rubber thing, you can lift those balls on the rubber, because the big wheel will give more force .
But its pretty useless, because it uses so much friction that it even wouldnt lift once.
joshomobos 7 months ago
if the weights were the same and neglecting friction, technically the four balls can be lifted by 1 ball if the ratio of the conveyor pulley and large wheel was 4:1 (larger wheel 4 times larger than conveyor). 5:1 would probably overcome friction and continually run.......hmm
RCvehicles 7 months ago
I designed a free ethernal engine in order to stop the 300 men that are trying to make us all their slaves by putting their hands over the entire planet all banks , every inch of land all laws written only serve the richer . You can see my model of perpetuummobile it at : link : = leviathan.host-ed.net =
cvar4o 8 months ago
Lol...!
What a piece of shit.
BlatendCrude 8 months ago
@BlatendCrude seems to be more of a mirror to one's mind than anything else.
..at least in your case.
erotickatana 6 months ago 2
Wait couldn't this work with the mechanical advantage of pulleys?
ultimage7 8 months ago
The music is fantastic. Who wouldn't want to listen to it forever?
Alexander9321 8 months ago
ESTO DENTRO DE MI IGNORANCIA, Y ES SOLO UNA OPINION, PERO NO ES PERPETUO SINO CONTINUO, POR QUE EN ALGUN MOMENTO SE DEBERA HACER UN MANTENIMIENTO, PARA REPARAR PIEZAS QUE POR EL USO Y EL TIEMPO, SUFRIRAN ALGUN DESGASTE.
ATTE VITTIN ABARZA
AVAZRABA 8 months ago
@AVAZRABA Burrito?
pombenenge 8 months ago
2 balls cant lift 5 ?
evldmon 8 months ago
it would never work!fail
23234233 8 months ago
i find it extemely difficult to masturbate on this video
ionutreturns 9 months ago 153
@ionutreturns but not impossible!! :)
CT2507 9 months ago
@ionutreturns I know, my uncle is helping me
PunkntheGodfather 6 months ago
@ionutreturns Maybe your fantasy got corrupted, or there are too many balls in this vid.. ;-)
HGNnet 5 months ago
@HGNnet you mean you find it easy to masturbate watching this video? PERVERT
ionutreturns 5 months ago
@ionutreturns Maybe it didn't come over very well, sorry if I offended you in any way.. I did mean the very opposite ofcourse.. A lot of people I know who know me, find it hilarious when I put it that way.. You must be aware somehow that we are living in a kind of upside down reality.. I must admit it's a strange kind of humor.. I agree with you about the difficulty involved with this vid.. LOL
HGNnet 5 months ago
@ionutreturns
So do I
Suviettrussian 4 months ago
@Suviettrussian in soviet russia videos masturbate looking at you
ionutreturns 4 months ago 11
@ionutreturns lol
RADARULES 4 months ago
@ionutreturns add some japaneese girls and you'll have better luck
MrJohn7459 3 months ago
If everything was perfectly smooth and oiled and no energy was lost in friction then after starting this it would run forever, but even then it's not gaining any energy, and is not perpetual motion.
VVVandegere 9 months ago
es buena es probable .... al que dice que pasa con las 4 bolas que suben cuando 1 baja eso se puede hacer con un sistemita de poleas o engranajes como los motore que dan una vuelta y el otro da mas o menos segun los engranajes
hayq ue darle una vuelta mas de rosca a esta idea
me gusto
mrchicho99 9 months ago
na pewno by tak na serio nie było!!
danielziom14 9 months ago
this thing should go BACkWARDS.
32qazx 9 months ago
That would never work, for that to work you would need more balls forcing the wheel around than the hopper carrying the balls back up!
spikeman14 9 months ago
who wrote this song?
TannerWillow 10 months ago
One ball cant wear 5
Bachtiosin 10 months ago
How can 2 balls take up 5 balls?
zrnicek 10 months ago
@zrnicek 'Give me a lever long enough and I will move the world'
gigwhipx10fast 10 months ago
@zrnicek the big wheel must have a shitton more leverage than the belt.
CrankyCassanova 10 months ago
Następny debil , który nie ma pojęcia o fizyce !!!!!!
DominikMajor 10 months ago
Haha, that's no possible.
It has a very evident defect.
AnuarPhysics 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol. You've got the weight of one marble pulling up four.
jspade1019 11 months ago 11
@jspade1019
LOOOL you say someting:D
btw in which program was it written? what's the name of the program thx:)
Mradmin901 10 months ago
this one would not work, it would start running backwards before choking on the marbles
jamschnitter 11 months ago
it´s awesome!!!
computer66ful 11 months ago
И им не стыдно?))
Пожаловался на видео по пункту "Жестокое обращение с детьми" (так как не нашёл более подходящей причины)...
ElisDN 11 months ago
How you make it, i mean what program, uh its really cool, please tell me how you made that. Thanks.
XloooooolerX 11 months ago
Author.GO TO SCHOOL!!!
RomazoeD 11 months ago
it needs more cowbell
MrThesubscriber99 1 year ago
has anyone seen 2 guys pull up a piano??? how does that work....pulleys.....1 ball can make 4 balls go up, but the distance that the 4 balls went would be roughly less then 1/4th the distance of the one ball. So this still isn't possible, but clearly possible to send balls up a pulley fewer then whats powering the pulley.
Gondus 1 year ago
*cough* FRICTION *cough*
taoufikem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That would not work. 1-2 balls cant pull all those others up the band
Dasmaster1 1 year ago 2
ржу нимагу =))
ReplicA2126 1 year ago
I would say this is scientifically accurate, if I lived in the 13th century.
BlueChipNinja 1 year ago
потери при трении будут большие
1992ball 1 year ago
ище что-то обсуждают! Диблоиды американские!
arkan24732473 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can not make this 1 ball can not make 4 balls go up.
269george 1 year ago 21
@269george i was thinking the same!!
strandvis 1 year ago
@269george I just wanted to comment that, what the guy used as program was way too irrealistic :S
Rboysblaster 1 year ago
@269george actually, its a thing called gears, the same as how it can be really hard to ride a bike up hill, unless you use the right gears.
viablethc 9 months ago
@viablethc
I think he might be right. In this case reduction gearing might not be enough to compensate for the weight and ascent of the balls. Less of an angle would help, but that would lengthen the track and you would need more balls...which in turn would be more weight. So now we're back where we started.
bandsaw000o0 9 months ago
@269george haha, very true. This idiot don't even know the laws of mechanica....
War4Skills 8 months ago
@269george если плечо силы в четыре раза больше то может, и идиоты тебя всякие плюсуют
TheFuckel 8 months ago
@269george
You're actually wrong
did you notice the wheel is bigger ?
@War4Skills
I guess you're the one that know shit about "the laws of mechanica". It's called physics.
All perpetuum mobile animations make sense and are theoretically right
D4L33tz0r 8 months ago
@269george mechanical advantage... angle of inclined plane.....ever use a pully? ever put a stick under your mother to pry her out of bed?
xylsplat 8 months ago
@269george Just curious what about a gear ratio that would allow 1 ball to move 4.
B0DYR0T 8 months ago
@269george if the flippers on that bigger wheel are made of lead then that 1 marble only needs to prevent the big wheel from losing momentum.
katsumorymoto 7 months ago
bro help me too...please you sent to me...step by step to doing that...my Villages don't have energy in my home too....
Moanepi 1 year ago
Perpetuum Mobile? what hapend to gravity?
tomislavlac 1 year ago 2
i dont remember the fact that 2 balls can lift 5
TheRealEric31415 1 year ago 2
@TheRealEric31415 yeah, but if the wheel is big enough, the balls are at a sufficient distance from the center to gain enough pull, so they lift the 5 balls...it's just physics. it wouldn't work for other reasons (sizes of gears, friction etc)
BmGeoBm 1 year ago
@BmGeoBm ah, its like the mobiles that move further from the center to get more levrage, but i agree, the friction would stop it
TheRealEric31415 1 year ago
sure, in the right wheel there is at no time more than ONE ball, while the other wheel (which is powered by the right) constantly carries 4 to greather alltitude.
even a retarded monkey would come to the conclusion it doesnt work :(
randomize0815 1 year ago
Pisces -> 20 February – 20 March
OtzeThrumpworth 1 year ago
i want to buy one of these
snarkbolt 1 year ago
perpetuum mobile doesn't exist. there are going to be lost for some parameters. friction or whatever...
kdrscout 1 year ago
this isnt possible becuase the wieght of the balls providing the energy isnt great enough to lift all the balls on the other belt.. . .
NUKE0IT 1 year ago
Wow, this is an exceptionally bad perpetuum mobile design, energy losses freaking everywhere. Not that any design would work..
lerikhkl 1 year ago
it would only work if there was no such thing as friction
ilovemyhonda250ex 1 year ago
@ilovemyhonda250ex
The problem here is that the weight of a single sphere can't rise up 4 or more spheres lol
baldes 1 year ago
@baldes yeah that too
ilovemyhonda250ex 1 year ago
не будет работать, забыли про потери на втулках или подшипниках, рано или поздно настанет момент когда очередной шарик не сможет поднятся
mazai335 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
rebelliouseoagj 1 year ago
крайне ущербная конструкция
NapalmHv 1 year ago
is that a game?????????????????????'''''
tiracia 1 year ago
this one wont work because theres two balls pushing down the big gear which somehow makes the little thing to pick up 4 balls??? @ balls can lift up 4? wouldn't work. Maybe magnets could aid this. Personally I think perpetual motion is possible. but this definitely is not gonna work.
royalpanthera7 1 year ago