Citizens are spying on President Obama and his administrations too; we just are not breaking the law to do it. We can even post it on our websites and link to what we find on news comment sections.
Wonderful bit of doublespeak - You have to give up your freedoms in order to be free smh. Orwell wouldn't be proud. He'd have to be put on a paxil slow drip
Speaking of giving amnesty to lawbreakers...Ronald Regan did so for thousands and thousands of...Illegal immegrants.
Gee, guess amnesty for lawbreakers isn't all bad then?
Also, I note that "Snugly" has it wrong. FISA allows them to listen in on FOREIGN calls that are routed through the USA. If an American Taliban member happens to be the one being called, that somehow means that we have to not listen to the instructions he's being sent by Osama Bin Laden?
terrorism happens for a reason. have you ever thought that the terrorists wouldnt throw away their own life for *just* bombing random people when they can just shoot them instead
In any case, the motivation is irrelevant. Terrorism is bad, whether they're doing it because some Imam who wants to bring about Armageddon, or because George Bush Senior thwarted Saddam Hussein's attempt to take over Kuwait (That's Osama-bin-asshat's reason)
perhaps the motivation is that your country bombed the sh!t out of um...let me check google...70 in the last 15 years... (please note there are only around 195 countries) =P
anyways, the Iraqi was much more content to live with electricity, abundant food and water supplies, and an almost universally available education with some strangers disappearing randomly, rather than getting their homes blown sky high by rockets in exchange for political freedom =P (disclaimer: i do NOT support terrorists)
oh, and even if most of them *were* justified, there has to be some kind of coincidence between the US invading more countries than any other have done in human history?
We canadian pussies have flying squirrels for our air force, beavers and kayaks for the navy, and concrete filled beer cans for WMDs (weapons of mass distraction), but nevertheless, we have both a higher life expectancy and satisfaction rate than the US. I wonder why...
So you support viscious dictators with "rape rooms" who feed people feet first into wood chippers and pay the families of terrorists a reward for suicide bombings, but not the actual terrorists themselves?
yes, i do prefer living under the rule of dictators over foreign *illegal* occupation under martial law. hey, I wouldn't worry about my roof randomly exploding killing my kids, now would i? =P
Define "Illegal"...if you mean "Sanctioned by the United Nations and legally approved by the congress" I'm not sure how you can call it "illegal"
and did you completely miss the cheering crowds, and the trial of Saddam BY THE IRAQIS, NOT THE US, who found him guilty of crimes against humanity and executed him?
If you prefer to live under the rule of dictators, why don't you move from Canada to someplace more to your liking, like China or North Korea or Iran?
lol i have no idea why im wasting my time debating on some useless topic that affects me in no way. anyhow, heres my two cents.
of course, i am referring to international law, not only the law of the us. (i mean, no nation would they say their own invasion is illegal in their own law, not even the Third Reich or the Empire of Japan)
furthermore, the united states obviously does not treat iraqis as her own citizens, so no more could be debated on that issue. (check some videos of US soldiers committing war crimes, on *youtube*, notice yt has a very strict filter. on other sites, I have found dogs shot, children tied to poles, and mock executions, and those were mild enough that they were filmed)
btw, I don't believe that Iraq was invaded for oil. it was a ruse of Bush to continue his presidency, oldest trick in the book
This would actually be funny if it weren't bang-on. The spying provisions of the warrantless wiretap bill did not expire today the way the Prez and the 'publicans would like us to believe, but rather only the immunity clause for the telecoms expired today. The spying part is hale and well until August '08. National emergency indeed.
Citizens are spying on President Obama and his administrations too; we just are not breaking the law to do it. We can even post it on our websites and link to what we find on news comment sections.
MarieDevine 8 months ago
this is so fuckin creepy.
is this against or for?
theshortdosekidd 10 months ago
Wonderful bit of doublespeak - You have to give up your freedoms in order to be free smh. Orwell wouldn't be proud. He'd have to be put on a paxil slow drip
rfalfonse 1 year ago
Funny because its true.
avzett 1 year ago
Genius.
biped19 1 year ago
That bears a terrorist. echelon.
DukeChronic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to know more, you must be a terrorist :)
mruef 1 year ago
this was HILARIOUS btw until i read the reject commentary
Yaseen47 2 years ago
MORONS
Yaseen47 2 years ago
Comment removed
theenforcer57 2 years ago
Speaking of giving amnesty to lawbreakers...Ronald Regan did so for thousands and thousands of...Illegal immegrants.
Gee, guess amnesty for lawbreakers isn't all bad then?
Also, I note that "Snugly" has it wrong. FISA allows them to listen in on FOREIGN calls that are routed through the USA. If an American Taliban member happens to be the one being called, that somehow means that we have to not listen to the instructions he's being sent by Osama Bin Laden?
Gee, that sounds really-safe?
RedwoodTheElf 3 years ago
terrorism happens for a reason. have you ever thought that the terrorists wouldnt throw away their own life for *just* bombing random people when they can just shoot them instead
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
Necro threads much?
In any case, the motivation is irrelevant. Terrorism is bad, whether they're doing it because some Imam who wants to bring about Armageddon, or because George Bush Senior thwarted Saddam Hussein's attempt to take over Kuwait (That's Osama-bin-asshat's reason)
RedwoodTheElf 2 years ago
perhaps the motivation is that your country bombed the sh!t out of um...let me check google...70 in the last 15 years... (please note there are only around 195 countries) =P
anyways, the Iraqi was much more content to live with electricity, abundant food and water supplies, and an almost universally available education with some strangers disappearing randomly, rather than getting their homes blown sky high by rockets in exchange for political freedom =P (disclaimer: i do NOT support terrorists)
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
oh, and even if most of them *were* justified, there has to be some kind of coincidence between the US invading more countries than any other have done in human history?
We canadian pussies have flying squirrels for our air force, beavers and kayaks for the navy, and concrete filled beer cans for WMDs (weapons of mass distraction), but nevertheless, we have both a higher life expectancy and satisfaction rate than the US. I wonder why...
oh forgot polar bears for the special ops
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
So you support viscious dictators with "rape rooms" who feed people feet first into wood chippers and pay the families of terrorists a reward for suicide bombings, but not the actual terrorists themselves?
How incredibly hypocritical of you.
RedwoodTheElf 2 years ago
yes, i do prefer living under the rule of dictators over foreign *illegal* occupation under martial law. hey, I wouldn't worry about my roof randomly exploding killing my kids, now would i? =P
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
Define "Illegal"...if you mean "Sanctioned by the United Nations and legally approved by the congress" I'm not sure how you can call it "illegal"
and did you completely miss the cheering crowds, and the trial of Saddam BY THE IRAQIS, NOT THE US, who found him guilty of crimes against humanity and executed him?
If you prefer to live under the rule of dictators, why don't you move from Canada to someplace more to your liking, like China or North Korea or Iran?
RedwoodTheElf 2 years ago
lol i have no idea why im wasting my time debating on some useless topic that affects me in no way. anyhow, heres my two cents.
of course, i am referring to international law, not only the law of the us. (i mean, no nation would they say their own invasion is illegal in their own law, not even the Third Reich or the Empire of Japan)
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
furthermore, the united states obviously does not treat iraqis as her own citizens, so no more could be debated on that issue. (check some videos of US soldiers committing war crimes, on *youtube*, notice yt has a very strict filter. on other sites, I have found dogs shot, children tied to poles, and mock executions, and those were mild enough that they were filmed)
btw, I don't believe that Iraq was invaded for oil. it was a ruse of Bush to continue his presidency, oldest trick in the book
THISNAMEOWNS 2 years ago
Heck this government loves me so much they'd probably stick me in a hole so deep those bad ole terrorists will never find me.
deumbrae 3 years ago
***** & Favored
OtisBDriftwood1929 4 years ago
OMG this is awesome!!! Fave and 5*
heavydny86 4 years ago
"if you sacrafice liberty for security, you end up losing both."
FunnyGuyx27 4 years ago 5
Hear, hear, FunnyGuy.
GottaLaff 4 years ago
i mean at 52 seconds ;p
ORACLE063 4 years ago
Hehe, saw that, thanks to you!
GottaLaff 4 years ago
1:32 on the TV it says "Rockfeller was here"
ORACLE063 4 years ago
The way the bear laughs makes me crack up laughing!
MrAgmoore 4 years ago 2
This would actually be funny if it weren't bang-on. The spying provisions of the warrantless wiretap bill did not expire today the way the Prez and the 'publicans would like us to believe, but rather only the immunity clause for the telecoms expired today. The spying part is hale and well until August '08. National emergency indeed.
tscheezy 4 years ago 4