Added: 1 year ago
From: johnj1954
Views: 9,784
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the past is buried - many times it just simply is not...

    It requires a depth to pay - so the soul some to rest...

  • Well done very interesting, looking forward to more videos from you johnj1954.

  • Calm down about the polish people guys, most of us live in Canada now anyways

  • what movie is this from?

  • @bh5496 With Fire and Sword, Ogniem i mieczem

  • @johnj1954 Catholics and Orthodox are Brothers in Christ by the grace of God we should be united.

  • I have no idea what waldi said but from what I have read the Cossacks asked the Poles to help them against Moscow and Moscow to help against the Poles. So they were not strong enough to do it alone. Why is that? They owned the best land in the region. Were they just pacifists at heart? Why didn't they have a mighty army to defend their abundant riches? t now know the Tatars played a big part in this and I read that they supported both sides (Cossacks or their enemies) as it suited. Pricks!

  • Bravo, Johnj! This is simply wonderful.

  • dzięki sojuszowi Tatarzy wywieżli pół Ukrainy w Jasyr nie Polaków . Na targu można było kupić jeńca za strzałę i to była wojna wyzwoleńcza bzdura

  • @waldi38000 Check your history again, waldi... Ukrainians were NOT sold. Prisoners of War were given as part of the Alliance with Tuhar' Bey. It may not have been the 'Christian' thing to do, but Khmelnyts'kii needed a larger army, therefore compromises were made (plunder & slaves) for the Turkik Tuhar'.

    I've seen this same comment written by various Poles on a plethora of videos around YouTube. You're all just parroting each other without checking your facts. What you're writing is propaganda.

  • @irynski They may not have been sold for money or goods, but they were given away in exchange for support, which still isn't justifiable and doesn't change the fact that Khmelnytski made a major sacrifice by letting a foreign force rape, slaughter, and pillage the country he was trying to "defend" or "free" from oppression. However waldi seems to make some very large exaggerations when he says half of Ukraine was taken by the Tatars.

  • @Jakub2610 I think we need to be very cautious about oversimplification on every level when we examine history. Context is everything. Our region on the world (Ukraine & Poland) was highly desirable to other empires & we were living under terrible Feudalism. We can't pull on single threads & declare them to be absolutes. Alliances & decisions made were within a context. Condemnation is easy... but alternative methods are difficult to judge.

  • @irynski It was necissary to get the Khan's support, and Khmelnytski needed it, that we can agree on, if that's what you mean by "adding context". But I still believe the price was too high to pay, especially since Khmelnytski incorporated Ukraine into Russia afterwards; the most feudal and absolute state in the world. Is that how Khmelnytski planned to free the Cossacks from feudal oppression?

  • @Jakub2610 Khmelnytski made the mistake of entering into an alliance with the Muscovites due to their being Orthodox - something most Ukrainians despise him for. Sadly, in this instance, the context is that he took them on face value. Dealings with the Poles & other ethnicities in the past had led him (& those he consulted with) to believe that agreements were honourable & were honoured. It ended up being the most poignant lesson that Muscovites are not the same species as decent human beings.

  • @irynski Амінь :)

  • @Jakub2610 My understanding of the 'context', Khmelnystski was honourable but naive. The Treaty of Pereyaslav all but destroyed Poland & Ukraine. I don't believe that was his intention. We know he quit Kraków honourably, leaving the Poles to their own rule. This wasn't a war to create an empire. The intent was that Poland & Ukraine maintain their own lands & governance. Had he any idea of the outcome, I'm certain he wouldn't have even have entertained the idea of an alliance with the Russians.

  • @Jakub2610 Peace between our nations. The Treaty of Pereyaslav allowed the Russian liars & scoundrels to insinuate their imperialism -- a tragedy of such magnitude that we're still reeling from it.

    Best of luck for the European Cup! Let's hope this brings us together... Poland & Ukraine united is Russia's greatest nightmare!

  • @irynski Best of luck, let Russia bow before our united strengths! Sto lat!

  • @Jakub2610 Indeed, Jakub! It's something to aspire to :-)

    Wishing you - and our nations - a Happy New Year! We have the strength, the intellect AND the resources Russia covets!

  • I must confess I found this extremely interesting, its a region, whos history I dare say I really don't really know as much about as I would like to. Very imformative. Ty.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more