''This is Science...... wow, three words and they tell a lie, it usually talkes creationist videos 11 seconds to lie. This has to be a record. Much shorter than, "Evolutionists say that....''
I don't see how this proves anything - evolution has nothing to do with religion. Creatures change because of interactions with their environment. You might say God gives them the "power" to do this. However you rationalize it, though, it is important not to refuse a theory simply because of perceived incompatibilities with one's worldview. The universe is amazing place, and it is difficult for man to conceive of it's possibilities. Thank God for that!
Thats not the point here. The point here is that evolution is contradictory to what the Bible teaches and even to what we observe in nature. Simple as that. You either follow the Word of God or the theory of Evolution, you can never have both.
@gneisenau321 First of all, evolution has been demonstrated many times over. A simple substitution of an amino acid in a chain of DNA (ie: a mutation) can and does produce "a different creature". At any rate, I don't see how any of this contradicts the Bible, but even if it does, it matters little; the real message is morality, virtue, etc - trying to integrate scientific observations with our spiritual ideals is (mostly) just a waste of time, IMO...
"First of all, evolution has been demonstrated many times over."
Like how?
"A simple substitution of an amino acid in a chain of DNA (ie: a mutation) can and does produce "a different creature"."
Give me an example.
"At any rate, I don't see how any of this contradicts the Bible"?
Simple, Holy Scriptures say God created the world in six days, God rested on the seventh. Evolution says creatures have been evolving for millions of years from a non-living thing, like that'll happen....
@SebGarth There is no problem with science and God. It is just that scientific discoveries keeps proving the bible wrong and that upsets these people.
@gneisenau321 Nothing at all! In fact, I think what you are doing (having viewed your youtube homepage) is a great blessing indeed. Keep up the good work!
2. "Science keeps proving the bible wrong. sorry."
Science like what? Words that come out of the mouth of so called "experts"?
3. There wasn't only a flood but an earthquake which changed the face of the earth. Water came out from under the earth and from the sky which was much different in those days. All the "dead bodies" would be what are known as "fossils".
@gneisenau321 i think ur confusing 'so called experts' with experts. experts are the ones who are heaads of the field, most knowledgeable and do leading research =]
that flood must have lasted billions of ears in order to make all those fossils =/ with some insane currents in order to bury them in order
@gneisenau321 erm nope id disagree. If it was in terms on an exam style they would beat all others in that field.
They get the name because theyve been doing the research in that field for as long as they have. couple that with the 'general knowledge' they gain through doing a degree and subsequent phd, id say its a pretty acceptable title.
''This is Science...... wow, three words and they tell a lie, it usually talkes creationist videos 11 seconds to lie. This has to be a record. Much shorter than, "Evolutionists say that....''
gregrutz 1 year ago
I don't see how this proves anything - evolution has nothing to do with religion. Creatures change because of interactions with their environment. You might say God gives them the "power" to do this. However you rationalize it, though, it is important not to refuse a theory simply because of perceived incompatibilities with one's worldview. The universe is amazing place, and it is difficult for man to conceive of it's possibilities. Thank God for that!
SebGarth 2 years ago
@SebGarth
"evolution has nothing to do with religion"?
Thats not the point here. The point here is that evolution is contradictory to what the Bible teaches and even to what we observe in nature. Simple as that. You either follow the Word of God or the theory of Evolution, you can never have both.
gneisenau321 1 year ago
@gneisenau321 First of all, evolution has been demonstrated many times over. A simple substitution of an amino acid in a chain of DNA (ie: a mutation) can and does produce "a different creature". At any rate, I don't see how any of this contradicts the Bible, but even if it does, it matters little; the real message is morality, virtue, etc - trying to integrate scientific observations with our spiritual ideals is (mostly) just a waste of time, IMO...
SebGarth 1 year ago
@SebGarth
"First of all, evolution has been demonstrated many times over."
Like how?
"A simple substitution of an amino acid in a chain of DNA (ie: a mutation) can and does produce "a different creature"."
Give me an example.
"At any rate, I don't see how any of this contradicts the Bible"?
Simple, Holy Scriptures say God created the world in six days, God rested on the seventh. Evolution says creatures have been evolving for millions of years from a non-living thing, like that'll happen....
gneisenau321 1 year ago
@gneisenau321
"Like how?"
For example, people who traditionally live at high altitudes (eg: the Andes) have shown an adaptation to lower oxygen densities.
"Give me an example."
Genetically altered food.
"Simple, Holy Scriptures say..."
Spirituality can't be explained by using science, and vice-versa. Both have there purpose...to reject one because of the other is a mistake, I think.
SebGarth 1 year ago
@SebGarth There is no problem with science and God. It is just that scientific discoveries keeps proving the bible wrong and that upsets these people.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@SebGarth
"trying to integrate scientific observations with our spiritual ideals is (mostly) just a waste of time, "?
Honestly, what do you think is so wrong about praising the LORD God for all the wonderful things He has made.
gneisenau321 1 year ago
@gneisenau321 Nothing at all! In fact, I think what you are doing (having viewed your youtube homepage) is a great blessing indeed. Keep up the good work!
SebGarth 1 year ago
@gneisenau321
1. The Theory of Evolution explains what we see in nature and the fossil record.
2. Evolution does not disprove God, it never talks about her.
3. The bible says we all came off a boat. Get real.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz
1. Not a very good argument. I could also say that the Bible explains what we see in nature and the fossil record.
2. True, Evolution can't disprove God but it is contradictory to what is taught in Scripture. BTW, God is not a "her".
3. The ark was more of a giant floating warehouse rather than a "boat".
gneisenau321 1 year ago
@gneisenau321 1. The bible does not explain anything we find in nature, in fact it was wrong about the earth being the center of the solar system.
2. Science keeps proving the bible wrong. sorry.
3. There was no flood, it is impossible. No evidence, no mud layer with all the dead bodies.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz
1. Which verse / who said that?
2. "Science keeps proving the bible wrong. sorry."
Science like what? Words that come out of the mouth of so called "experts"?
3. There wasn't only a flood but an earthquake which changed the face of the earth. Water came out from under the earth and from the sky which was much different in those days. All the "dead bodies" would be what are known as "fossils".
gneisenau321 1 year ago
@gneisenau321 i think ur confusing 'so called experts' with experts. experts are the ones who are heaads of the field, most knowledgeable and do leading research =]
that flood must have lasted billions of ears in order to make all those fossils =/ with some insane currents in order to bury them in order
haz020190 9 months ago
@haz020190
"most knowledgeable" in name only.
gneisenau321 9 months ago
@gneisenau321 erm nope id disagree. If it was in terms on an exam style they would beat all others in that field.
They get the name because theyve been doing the research in that field for as long as they have. couple that with the 'general knowledge' they gain through doing a degree and subsequent phd, id say its a pretty acceptable title.
haz020190 9 months ago