@swedishplayer97 the US did invade them near the end of WWI (Operation Archangel), so I'd say "Attacking the Soviet Union as soon as it formed" would fit the category of 'doing something to them'.
@Halo4Lyf yeah and white russians were the 2% of russian population who supported serdom which is akin to slavery. just like in vietnam america supported the south vietnamese, one of the harshest dictatorships in asia
@CCCP1USSR Incorrect. The 'White Russians' is a catch-all term for anyone who opposed the Bolsheviks during the time of the civil war. Some were Czarists, some were republicans, some were social democrats. I can find no indication that any of them supported serfdom, since that institution had been abolished in the 1860s.
And Hell, if the choices were between being a slave to a noble, or a slave to the all-consuming state, I think I'd go with feudalism. At least they allowed religion.
@Halo4Lyf ended in 1860? HA maybe officially, but all the way up until 1918 did it finally end. otherwise, why would they have even started a peoples' revolution?? and they werent 'slaves' to the state(excluding stalin, who wasnt even semi-communist) after the revolution, in fact most ended up in better living conditions. those who ended up in worse were the ones used to living on 5000000RU an hour... also, why didnt america just stay out of OUR revolution?
@CCCP1USSR Because the Marxist-Leninist ideology insists on exporting itself to other countries. Crushing it before it got a foothold in Russia would've been for the best. I wish we had captured Berlin rather than let you people have it, and then kept marching for Moscow.
But hey, Communism already did it's damage. The Russian Federation today has a First World birth rate and a Third World mortality rate. That's not sustainable. You're a dying country.
@Halo4Lyf how is the birth rate in any way a result of communism? and if you tried to do such a thing after ww2 you wouldve had to kill 90% of russians who were pro communist(not necessarily stalin) and i can guarantee 99% were pro russia national and wouldve died than let your western filth into our nation. you wouldve had to pull a genocide that dwarfs hitlers in comparison
@CCCP1USSR Shitty healthcare, generations of crushing nihilism and poverty masquerading as an egalitarian ideology, and general lack of economic opportunity. That's how communism is responsible for the birth/death rate in the Russian Federation today.
Tell me something, if the Slavic nations (not just the Russian people, but all the others in Eastern Europe that you subjugated) were so big on Communism, why did they greet the Nazis as liberators during the German drive east?
@Halo4Lyf because that was stalinism or titosism and if you paid any attention to what i said, neither of those IS COMMUNISM AT ALL. and there was very little poverty in post stalin USSR, only way to be poor is to quit your job and become a drug addict or alcoholic or some shit
@CCCP1USSR "you wouldve had to pull a genocide that dwarfs hitlers in comparison" Doubtful, you're not as fanatical as the Japs were. Lots of hardcore units to dig out, and an insurgency to fight later? Probably, yeah. But given that we'd be nuking cities, I think that would crush even Russian resolve.
And hey, if we had to depopulate Russia in order to save the world from Marxist-Leninism and avoid the Cold War? I consider that a fair trade.
@Halo4Lyf leave it to an american to have his first solution to be sit home and get fat while nuking my nation without ever having put up a man's fight. Yes, it would be a nuclear war likely, but russia wouldnt start it. and then the world will turn on your pathetic nation for such a.. disgusting and cowardly tactic
@CCCP1USSR I love how you dumb fucking Reds always whine, "but but but nobody has done Communism correctly yet!!1!" It doesn't matter how it was or could be implemented, or how or who could implement it in the future. The basic, core ideology of Marx itself is an abject failure because it ignores human nature. Communism always has been and always will be a failure, wherever it is tried, no matter who tries it.
But I doubt you care, for some reason. Fanatics rarely do.
@Halo4Lyf and capitalism has been successful? and dont fucking say yes because true capitalism hasnt ever existed and neither has true communism. if you really want to argue how effective they are, come to Moscow and meet me in red square, ill show you how a communist 7.62mm feels
@CCCP1USSR Yup. Because all capitalism is, is the legal protection of private property and freedom of association as applied to economics. You can't claim to be free if you don't live in a capitalist society. And you're right, America is not a purely capitalist society at the moment. But it was prior to about 1900, and that was the single most profound period of growth any nation has had in history.
Wigger please, I don't have to show up in Red Square. Just got to drop a W88 on it.
@Halo4Lyf and you are foolish enough to think we wont kill you back? we wont start the war but FYI it takes 30-45 minutes for nukes to hit, plenty of time to launch them back. then you stuck up americans will be responsible for the endangerment or extinction of the human race.
@CCCP1USSR You dumb-fucks always start the war. It's in your nature, part of who you are, central to the cultural DNA of your twisted little ultranationalist souls.
But let's say that we do start the war. What makes you think we'll leave any of your strategic forces to retaliate with? And if we do start the war, then wouldn't we have our BMD shield in full readiness? What would you do about that?
@Halo4Lyf youre what? you mean your system that'll shoot down maybe 10 missiles before you get ripped a new asshole, starting with norad, then the silos, then DC, NYC and every other scum sucking cesspool city in your fat nation? oh and youre saying we always start wars? who started this argument saying america would nuke russia? fucking typical american hypocrite. you shame those americans who actually have a brain
@CCCP1USSR Currently at a strength of 50 land-based interceptors, very true. When Obama is ejected from office, and the program revitalized, 100 interceptors by 2014. 500 by 2020 and 1000 by 2025. That's just the ground-based interceptors, it doesn't include the SM-3 upgrades that every AEGIS vessel in the US Navy can carry, or the Patriot Block IVs.
If you want to fight a war with us, do it in the next 10 years, or you'll find your strategic weapons rendered expensive hunks of junk.
@CCCP1USSR And by all means, destroy our major cities! You'll kill welfare leeches and Democrat voters, not a whole lot else. You'll be cleaning up our domestic messes for us, and I'll be the first to thank you for it. You won't even destroy our industry in large part, because it's been dispersed to the South and Midwest over the last 20 years. You going to throw a warhead at every town of 5K-10K that has one or two manufacturing plants in it?
@Halo4Lyf firstly, i hope you realize we have countermeasures too. lasers, emps, high speed rockets, things of those nature. oh and lasers and emps arent one time use. also, in your fictional cities that survive, sure there would be factories, but with 75% of americans dead, and the major cities irradiated, where would you get your supplies?
@CCCP1USSR I'll believe those countermeasures are useful when I see combat-conditions tests of them. You were having trouble getting the Bulava off the ground until last month. And Russian systems have proven to be so reliable in the past, huh? Tell you what, when you successfully test an FEL, I'll believe that Russia has a BMD capability of it's own. Until then, it's just vodka-fueled delusions of equality with the United States.
@Halo4Lyf Russia has surface to air lasers meant to fry a missiles engines or guidance systems, we have interceptor rockets, and we have EM field generators and focused RADAR which fry any electronics in the vicinity. oh and by the way, the bulava is in prototype stage, thats the whole point of prototypes is to fix kinks and errors. there are plenty of american things(like the m16) that were shit until they were improved and taken out of prototype stage. your internet knowledge is shit
@CCCP1USSR You really don't seem to understand something: America's industrial capacity is IN NO WAY CONCENTRATED IN THE MAJOR CITIES. Hasn't been for 20 years. Our major cities, being defined as places like NYC, DC, and Detroit are just good for producing welfare recipients and Democrat voters (but I repeat myself). If you'd want to destroy America's warfighting capacity, it would take more delivery systems than you've got, with a reliability Russian systems have never had.
@Halo4Lyf you obviously need to brush up on your post-1991 history, and even if there arent factories in big cities, like i asked earlier, how will you get supplies if all your cross-ocean ships are sunk and the ports are highly irradiated and destroyed? a factory isnt shit without the materials to build things
@Halo4Lyf how do you plan on extracting the natural resources? you have to remember in a post nuclear country im sure rebuilding industry will be your only trouble...(sarcasm)
@CCCP1USSR Yeah, because clearly radiation persists forever and never decays, or anything like that... (sarcasm, you drunken goat molester).
And what part of "hitting our major cities would not cripple American industry" did you not fucking understand. PLEASE NUKE NYC, Chicago, or DC. You will fix so many problems for us! And again, how are you planning on getting your nukes here? In your shitty, unreliable ICBMs, or your even shittier, more unreliable SLBMs? Or your obsolete bomber fleet?
@Halo4Lyf it wont decay, not in your immediate lifetime. maybe 10-15 years afterwords the cities would be safe to travel in unprotected. so unless you have a personal army and workforce and the ability to equip each of them with a protective suit, then you arent going to have any semi-industry for several decades at the least. get your head out of your ass and look at the reality
@CCCP1USSR "while nuking my nation without ever having put up a man's fight. " BAHAHA!!! Oh, how cute, you think war is about honor and like the little computer games you beat your dick to whilst fantasizing about being a soldier. It's not, child. It's about winning. "russia wouldnt start it." Oh really? That's hilarious, considering you've started every one of them since the advent of the USSR. "then the world will turn on your pathetic nation" And do what to us, precisely?
@swedishplayer97 america has also killed innocent civilians what america did was turn its back on them cheated them out of everything at the end of ww2 thats what we did
Can someone please tell me how do i watch and edit wic cutscenes from its folder ... i have WIC SA ..... or post a torrent for all the cutscenes of the game.
Funny isn't it, how the people defend their "Capitalist Swine" overlords then flee in fear and terror at the sight of their supposed communist liberators.
hey man both scenes are good. US scenes are good, USSR scenes are good. You gotta love the both perspectives of both sides and plus other NATO forces as well. Even though I am more of US side. I like games which shows both perspectives. And this is one of them.
soviet films had less action becouse... as you can see in the USA there are maney maney children/teens/adults killing people. crime gangs. people copy what they see in movies. but in ussr there was very little crime
@Zaharkl Actually lol, because Russia is so poor right now there is a lot more crime than U.S. haha nice try, Russia has MAAAAANY ghettos and other bad areas with rapists, serial killers, etc...
@jackpwnage117 your a fucking retard. thats why i fucking said USSR! AND SOVIET FILMS! hence SOVIET. the SOVIET union had near 0 crime rate. then after the collapse in 1900's movies were aloud in and the crime rate sky rocketed
@jackpwnage117 yes currently in russia it has horrible living conditions. the reason my family moved to the USA. but when USSR was it was alright in most places. but when living conditions get better i will move to my home town of Bila Tserkva Ukraine.
@Zaharkl Lol okay, but like how bad is it in Russia? My dad went to moscow right after the soviet union collapsed (after cold war) and he said it was horrible.
I think it kind of funny if this suprise attack how did they have time to find and put sand bag togather. don't tell me they do it real fast. cause I did it for the entier line and it take a life time.
@patton9 You shut the fuck up. Without the police you'd be dead in a ditch, learn to appreciate what they'd go through to keep assholes like YOU alive.
This game is awesome, but why must people bring up politics?
hopedream11 3 months ago
it's not the soviet assault cutscene!
is the cutscene 1 of the original game
thenetor471 5 months ago
ahh the silent treatment i see how it is Parker...
Commanderjao 6 months ago 2
I love how Parker never talks lol
TNT96782 6 months ago
Godd damn russians! They kill innocent civilians! What have the US ever done to them?
swedishplayer97 6 months ago
@swedishplayer97 the US did invade them near the end of WWI (Operation Archangel), so I'd say "Attacking the Soviet Union as soon as it formed" would fit the category of 'doing something to them'.
vernii 5 months ago
@vernii Actually, what we were doing was supporting the White Russians during the Russian Civil War. Not exactly invading a sovereign nation.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf yeah and white russians were the 2% of russian population who supported serdom which is akin to slavery. just like in vietnam america supported the south vietnamese, one of the harshest dictatorships in asia
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR Incorrect. The 'White Russians' is a catch-all term for anyone who opposed the Bolsheviks during the time of the civil war. Some were Czarists, some were republicans, some were social democrats. I can find no indication that any of them supported serfdom, since that institution had been abolished in the 1860s.
And Hell, if the choices were between being a slave to a noble, or a slave to the all-consuming state, I think I'd go with feudalism. At least they allowed religion.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf ended in 1860? HA maybe officially, but all the way up until 1918 did it finally end. otherwise, why would they have even started a peoples' revolution?? and they werent 'slaves' to the state(excluding stalin, who wasnt even semi-communist) after the revolution, in fact most ended up in better living conditions. those who ended up in worse were the ones used to living on 5000000RU an hour... also, why didnt america just stay out of OUR revolution?
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR Because the Marxist-Leninist ideology insists on exporting itself to other countries. Crushing it before it got a foothold in Russia would've been for the best. I wish we had captured Berlin rather than let you people have it, and then kept marching for Moscow.
But hey, Communism already did it's damage. The Russian Federation today has a First World birth rate and a Third World mortality rate. That's not sustainable. You're a dying country.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf how is the birth rate in any way a result of communism? and if you tried to do such a thing after ww2 you wouldve had to kill 90% of russians who were pro communist(not necessarily stalin) and i can guarantee 99% were pro russia national and wouldve died than let your western filth into our nation. you wouldve had to pull a genocide that dwarfs hitlers in comparison
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR Shitty healthcare, generations of crushing nihilism and poverty masquerading as an egalitarian ideology, and general lack of economic opportunity. That's how communism is responsible for the birth/death rate in the Russian Federation today.
Tell me something, if the Slavic nations (not just the Russian people, but all the others in Eastern Europe that you subjugated) were so big on Communism, why did they greet the Nazis as liberators during the German drive east?
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf because that was stalinism or titosism and if you paid any attention to what i said, neither of those IS COMMUNISM AT ALL. and there was very little poverty in post stalin USSR, only way to be poor is to quit your job and become a drug addict or alcoholic or some shit
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR "you wouldve had to pull a genocide that dwarfs hitlers in comparison" Doubtful, you're not as fanatical as the Japs were. Lots of hardcore units to dig out, and an insurgency to fight later? Probably, yeah. But given that we'd be nuking cities, I think that would crush even Russian resolve.
And hey, if we had to depopulate Russia in order to save the world from Marxist-Leninism and avoid the Cold War? I consider that a fair trade.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf leave it to an american to have his first solution to be sit home and get fat while nuking my nation without ever having put up a man's fight. Yes, it would be a nuclear war likely, but russia wouldnt start it. and then the world will turn on your pathetic nation for such a.. disgusting and cowardly tactic
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR I love how you dumb fucking Reds always whine, "but but but nobody has done Communism correctly yet!!1!" It doesn't matter how it was or could be implemented, or how or who could implement it in the future. The basic, core ideology of Marx itself is an abject failure because it ignores human nature. Communism always has been and always will be a failure, wherever it is tried, no matter who tries it.
But I doubt you care, for some reason. Fanatics rarely do.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf and capitalism has been successful? and dont fucking say yes because true capitalism hasnt ever existed and neither has true communism. if you really want to argue how effective they are, come to Moscow and meet me in red square, ill show you how a communist 7.62mm feels
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR Yup. Because all capitalism is, is the legal protection of private property and freedom of association as applied to economics. You can't claim to be free if you don't live in a capitalist society. And you're right, America is not a purely capitalist society at the moment. But it was prior to about 1900, and that was the single most profound period of growth any nation has had in history.
Wigger please, I don't have to show up in Red Square. Just got to drop a W88 on it.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf be a man and fight your battles in person. prove to me that you americans still have some sense of honor and courage
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR No thanks. Why should I? My goal isn't to make you admire me, it's to make you into a pile of irradiated ashes.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf and you are foolish enough to think we wont kill you back? we wont start the war but FYI it takes 30-45 minutes for nukes to hit, plenty of time to launch them back. then you stuck up americans will be responsible for the endangerment or extinction of the human race.
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR You dumb-fucks always start the war. It's in your nature, part of who you are, central to the cultural DNA of your twisted little ultranationalist souls.
But let's say that we do start the war. What makes you think we'll leave any of your strategic forces to retaliate with? And if we do start the war, then wouldn't we have our BMD shield in full readiness? What would you do about that?
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf youre what? you mean your system that'll shoot down maybe 10 missiles before you get ripped a new asshole, starting with norad, then the silos, then DC, NYC and every other scum sucking cesspool city in your fat nation? oh and youre saying we always start wars? who started this argument saying america would nuke russia? fucking typical american hypocrite. you shame those americans who actually have a brain
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR Currently at a strength of 50 land-based interceptors, very true. When Obama is ejected from office, and the program revitalized, 100 interceptors by 2014. 500 by 2020 and 1000 by 2025. That's just the ground-based interceptors, it doesn't include the SM-3 upgrades that every AEGIS vessel in the US Navy can carry, or the Patriot Block IVs.
If you want to fight a war with us, do it in the next 10 years, or you'll find your strategic weapons rendered expensive hunks of junk.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR And by all means, destroy our major cities! You'll kill welfare leeches and Democrat voters, not a whole lot else. You'll be cleaning up our domestic messes for us, and I'll be the first to thank you for it. You won't even destroy our industry in large part, because it's been dispersed to the South and Midwest over the last 20 years. You going to throw a warhead at every town of 5K-10K that has one or two manufacturing plants in it?
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf firstly, i hope you realize we have countermeasures too. lasers, emps, high speed rockets, things of those nature. oh and lasers and emps arent one time use. also, in your fictional cities that survive, sure there would be factories, but with 75% of americans dead, and the major cities irradiated, where would you get your supplies?
CCCP1USSR 1 month ago
@CCCP1USSR I'll believe those countermeasures are useful when I see combat-conditions tests of them. You were having trouble getting the Bulava off the ground until last month. And Russian systems have proven to be so reliable in the past, huh? Tell you what, when you successfully test an FEL, I'll believe that Russia has a BMD capability of it's own. Until then, it's just vodka-fueled delusions of equality with the United States.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf Russia has surface to air lasers meant to fry a missiles engines or guidance systems, we have interceptor rockets, and we have EM field generators and focused RADAR which fry any electronics in the vicinity. oh and by the way, the bulava is in prototype stage, thats the whole point of prototypes is to fix kinks and errors. there are plenty of american things(like the m16) that were shit until they were improved and taken out of prototype stage. your internet knowledge is shit
CCCP1USSR 4 weeks ago
@CCCP1USSR Oh, how cute, you think this is in Ian Flemming novel.
Halo4Lyf 4 weeks ago
@CCCP1USSR You really don't seem to understand something: America's industrial capacity is IN NO WAY CONCENTRATED IN THE MAJOR CITIES. Hasn't been for 20 years. Our major cities, being defined as places like NYC, DC, and Detroit are just good for producing welfare recipients and Democrat voters (but I repeat myself). If you'd want to destroy America's warfighting capacity, it would take more delivery systems than you've got, with a reliability Russian systems have never had.
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@Halo4Lyf you obviously need to brush up on your post-1991 history, and even if there arent factories in big cities, like i asked earlier, how will you get supplies if all your cross-ocean ships are sunk and the ports are highly irradiated and destroyed? a factory isnt shit without the materials to build things
CCCP1USSR 4 weeks ago
@CCCP1USSR America has all the natural resources we need, right here in CONUS. And an extremely robust, redundant rail network to move it.
Halo4Lyf 4 weeks ago
@Halo4Lyf how do you plan on extracting the natural resources? you have to remember in a post nuclear country im sure rebuilding industry will be your only trouble...(sarcasm)
CCCP1USSR 4 weeks ago
@CCCP1USSR Yeah, because clearly radiation persists forever and never decays, or anything like that... (sarcasm, you drunken goat molester).
And what part of "hitting our major cities would not cripple American industry" did you not fucking understand. PLEASE NUKE NYC, Chicago, or DC. You will fix so many problems for us! And again, how are you planning on getting your nukes here? In your shitty, unreliable ICBMs, or your even shittier, more unreliable SLBMs? Or your obsolete bomber fleet?
Halo4Lyf 4 weeks ago
@Halo4Lyf it wont decay, not in your immediate lifetime. maybe 10-15 years afterwords the cities would be safe to travel in unprotected. so unless you have a personal army and workforce and the ability to equip each of them with a protective suit, then you arent going to have any semi-industry for several decades at the least. get your head out of your ass and look at the reality
CCCP1USSR 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CCCP1USSR "while nuking my nation without ever having put up a man's fight. " BAHAHA!!! Oh, how cute, you think war is about honor and like the little computer games you beat your dick to whilst fantasizing about being a soldier. It's not, child. It's about winning. "russia wouldnt start it." Oh really? That's hilarious, considering you've started every one of them since the advent of the USSR. "then the world will turn on your pathetic nation" And do what to us, precisely?
Halo4Lyf 1 month ago
@swedishplayer97 america has also killed innocent civilians what america did was turn its back on them cheated them out of everything at the end of ww2 thats what we did
TheBabemonster 5 months ago
Can someone please tell me how do i watch and edit wic cutscenes from its folder ... i have WIC SA ..... or post a torrent for all the cutscenes of the game.
1000rami1000 7 months ago
Funny isn't it, how the people defend their "Capitalist Swine" overlords then flee in fear and terror at the sight of their supposed communist liberators.
davedavedaveannoy1 1 year ago 4
why parker never speaks ? is gordon freeman cousin ?
ToniMontana4000 1 year ago 2
soviets or the goodt not bat
denniso2000 1 year ago
This is some pretty damn good animation.
zenophas 1 year ago
they are using M16A2,good rifle
ToniMontana4000 1 year ago
I live in Washington, and I've seen some of Seattle. I could imagine a battle there.
10beandude 1 year ago
hey man both scenes are good. US scenes are good, USSR scenes are good. You gotta love the both perspectives of both sides and plus other NATO forces as well. Even though I am more of US side. I like games which shows both perspectives. And this is one of them.
LilATL94 2 years ago 47
Comment removed
StyIlez 2 years ago
Yeah, just like soviet films, they also had less action in them, be-cues they needed more attention from the brains...
P.S. No Offense to anybody.
ComradPaco 2 years ago
soviet films had less action becouse... as you can see in the USA there are maney maney children/teens/adults killing people. crime gangs. people copy what they see in movies. but in ussr there was very little crime
Zaharkl 2 years ago
@Zaharkl Actually lol, because Russia is so poor right now there is a lot more crime than U.S. haha nice try, Russia has MAAAAANY ghettos and other bad areas with rapists, serial killers, etc...
jackpwnage117 1 year ago
@jackpwnage117 your a fucking retard. thats why i fucking said USSR! AND SOVIET FILMS! hence SOVIET. the SOVIET union had near 0 crime rate. then after the collapse in 1900's movies were aloud in and the crime rate sky rocketed
Zaharkl 1 year ago
@Zaharkl Lol but I'm not a retard because the way you said it, YOU sir, sounded like a retard but yeah Russia sucks ass
jackpwnage117 1 year ago
@jackpwnage117 yes currently in russia it has horrible living conditions. the reason my family moved to the USA. but when USSR was it was alright in most places. but when living conditions get better i will move to my home town of Bila Tserkva Ukraine.
Zaharkl 1 year ago
@Zaharkl Lol okay, but like how bad is it in Russia? My dad went to moscow right after the soviet union collapsed (after cold war) and he said it was horrible.
jackpwnage117 1 year ago 2
@jackpwnage117 its gotten better but its still bad. i mean livable but worst than usa britain ;
Zaharkl 1 year ago
I think it kind of funny if this suprise attack how did they have time to find and put sand bag togather. don't tell me they do it real fast. cause I did it for the entier line and it take a life time.
aiaek 2 years ago 5
And Soviets already have full air( aircrafts and bombers, helis not suprise) and altilery support and US don't.
Mesina2 2 years ago 4
Well back in the second world war some american cities had sand bag just for precaution.
xgentis 2 years ago 5
well the war had already started in europe. so bet they had civil defense in most cities so sand bags were actually there
mamaluigiwilldie123 2 years ago
The sandbags were pre-prepared, just need to set em up.
Rangerpl1322 2 years ago
at least the police are doing something right.
patton9 2 years ago 61
@patton9 You shut the fuck up. Without the police you'd be dead in a ditch, learn to appreciate what they'd go through to keep assholes like YOU alive.
MistarCrewsz 6 months ago 2