Added: 3 years ago
From: ILUVFUNKEYS345
Views: 1,823
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (231)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What programs were cut? The Denver Int'l airport program was cut? The USPS was cut? The 2002 Farm Bill was cut? When was Medicare cut? When was funding for the Capital Hill Visitors Center cut?

    Matt, if your only answer is "I don't care" you're getting very desperate. I assume you're accepting my evidence that Medicare does deny a larger share of claim lines than Aetna?

    The ER by law can't refuse anyone, even if they're illegally-residing in the USA.

  • Her silence was her concession Matthew. Glad you saw that. A lot of programs are over budget pretty much every year. Can you give me any gov't program that was on budget and on time?

  • Ladies and gentlemen, user KATAVIDEO has officially conceded the debate, she couldn't answer the specific gov't programs I listed for her that were way over budget and late.

    She's normally not too smart but I think the cold air in Chicago is getting to her. We accept KATAVIDEO's concession.

  • UTube,

    You didn't happen so see what Olbermann said about Scott Brown last night did you? After hearing that it is perfectly clear where Kata gets her inspiration from. I only hope they keep up the good work.

  • SILENT: Good point. When you can't win in the arena of ideas, call your opponent a racist.

    I think Krazy Keith is going to have an on-air meltdown someday.

  • SILENT: Kaka is having a difficult time over here. She must've been bothered by your comments too, I see they've all been thumbed down.

  • "That video? I shoved it up your mother's twat and twisted it."

    Hahaha. You don't need to take any psych classes to understand how weak that response was. I love people like Kata. Making us look better each and every day.

  • Here's a list of gov't programs that were late and/.or well over-budget that Kaka has conceded.

    1) USPS--over $3 bln. in the red last FY.

    2) Capitol Hill Visitors Center was mroe than double the initial price tag and about 6 yrs. late.

    3) Denver Int'l Airport

    4) 2002 Farm Bill

    5) 1990 price estimate for Medicare in 1965

    6) Int'l space station

    7) State-run Senate cafe. was in the red 37 of 44 years.

  • to review:

    silentnightwhisper made some stupid claims to rebut a remark I made a year ago.

    snw can't back up those claims with facts, but claims news polls are exactly the same as election results.

    snw brought race into it out of the blue, revealing her fear and racism that most people would consider embarrassing.

    snw was losing badly and brought in her friend utubekookdetector, who had her own ingenious strategy of asking an irrelevant question in hopes of giving her own prerehearsed response.

  • 'featuring assface the nazi convict'

    How pitiful. You really do sound like you are a 13 year old kid.

    I'll try one more thing.

    Who do you believe a majority of the military voted for? John McCain? Or quite possibly the weakest military leader in United States history, Barrack Obama?

  • @silentnightwhisper

    conservatards must enjoy having nazi convicts in the friends lists. because you have one there, and I think you know which one, too. LOL.

    military voted for... I already answered that.

    btw, the weakest military leaders in US history let bin laden get away at tora bora, twice. Another weak ass pathetic clown sent marines to get killed in Lebanon and then bailed, negotiated with terrorists and provided those terrorists with weapons.

    weak.

    limp.

    pathetic.

    guess his name.

  • Come now, Kata, try not to be a coward.

    Answer the question. Who do you believe the military voted for? I'll make it easy. Just say M or O.

  • no no little girl, I'm not the coward.

    The coward is the small person who posted a bullshit claim about the military vote.. a specific % vs %.. & then couldn't back it up.

    On its own, that's nothing.. but the cowardice, the feckless display of a complete lack of character came when this silly gal tried to pass off a news poll as an official election result.

    it proved the coward was too small to admit she didn't know something.

    cowardice is calling kookie in to try and change the subject.

    FAIL

  • I did not call utubekookdetector in.

    You 'fail' to answer again coward. Who do you think a majority of the military voted for?

  • previously answered as a courtesy, you even commented on it, silly girl.

    hilarious!

  • Kaka won't answer questions when she thinks she's going to corner herself.

    I guess I have no choice but to accept her concession. I think I'll refute her latest Markos M./Tancredo cut-and-paste video instead.

  • Ha, I'm looking forward to it. I know she can sense when she's getting 'backed into a corner'. She's been dancing around, biding her time with name calling for the past day.

  • to recap:

    silentnightwhisper made a claim she can't back up.

    silentnightwhisper than claimed that a news poll is the same as official election results. this shows a lack of character to just admit she didn't know something she had spouted off on.

    silentnightwhisper then called her friend utubekookdetector in to help, and kookie tried to change the subject with a question about some imaginary scenario that she already rehearsed an answer.

    an excellent display of conservatard mental weakness.

  • Your 'recap' and constant use of 'lol' shows your insecurities.

    Is it really hard to just say McCain or Obama?

    Your comments:

    First: US Troops Obama for President...

    Then: I didn't say 'a majority' of troops...

    Then: I'd believe McCain had won 51-49....

    Then: I said 'I would believe it' I didn't say i DO....

    Your answer is as clear as mud. Just try standing up and stating your opinion.

  • My opinion is that you're a little bitch.

    To recap: silentnightwhisper claimed the military vote in the 2008 presidential went a certain way. silentnightwhisper has been unable to back that up with real election results, but instead of just admitting she made it up, tried to pass off a news poll as official election results. Then she called her friend kookie for help, and kookie desperately tried to change the subject.

    this would have ended days ago if silentnightwhisper had character.

  • Bravo, bravo. That a way to show some class and great composure! Keep up the good work champ :)

  • to recap:

    silentnightwhisper is being a true conservatard, unable to back up a claim she made earlier. instead of displaying "class and composure" and just admitting she didn't know what she was talking about, she has continually lied and blamed me for her failure. she also needed to call in her friend utubekookdetector, who tried and failed to change the subject. silentnightwhisper has yet to produce any official election results to support her previous statements.

  • Oh my. This is where it really gets sad. So your admitting you can't answer?

  • answer what? something that's already been answered? I stand by everything I've written. that's too bad for you if you don't like the answers.

    to recap.. eh, just look at all the other "to recaps".. basically, silentnightwhisper is a little bitch who can't admit a mistake.

  • Honestly, just answer the question. I can't find any comment where you clearly gave me an answer. Instead of responding with the same 'i already answered' just step up and give me your definite opinion.

  • I don't have to answer your pissant little questions, LOL!!! The onus is on you. silentnightwhisper, YOU presented a claim about the military vote in the 2008 presidential election. and then you couldn't back it up with any official election results. and then you refused to admit that you didn't know what you were talking about. and you tried to pass off related by completely unofficial news polls as facts. and then you brought your girlfriend kookie in to defend you.

    pathetic.

  • I was wrong to word it 'official election results'. I should have said 'official exit polls'. Exit polls are more than 'newsroom' polls. There is only ONE 'official' set of election polls. Every single news organization has reported the one I have shown you, showing McCain over Obama in the military vote.

    So, again, you are admitting you are incapable of answering who YOU believe won the military vote?

  • I answered that pages ago

  • You know, if I thought that I had answered a question that was being asked again, I'd probably just answer a second time. I don't feel like playing cat and mouse right now. I'm sorry if you get off on it, but it just seems a bit childish to me.

    Or do you know that you haven't given a clear response?

  • I don't owe you a clear response.

  • Very well kata. I accept your submission. If you ever feel inclined to step up and attempt to answer I will gladly accept that as well.

  • to recap, silentnightwhisper failed at providing any facts whatsoever to back-up a ridiculous claim she made, and then proceeded to lie about the quality of the cnn polls she claims are the same as official election results. silentnightwhisper lied about calling her girlfriend utubekookdetector in for protection. kookie fails and fails again to change the subject. silentfrightenedkitten fails to change the subject by asking a question that was already answered.

    FAIL

    LOL LOL LOL LOL

  • Kaka is just doing what Kaka does. She's so paranoid that I'm going to use her answer against her that she's clamming up. Oh well, we'll just refute her Tancredo/Markos M. cut-and-paste video this weekend.

    As far as polls go, Kaka did use an ad populum appeal in her GOP HEALTHCARE: DON'T GIVE PEOPLE WHAT THEY WANT video.

    You should find my response in related vids.

  • kookie! you should tell everyone to read your super-well read blog. but have them take shifts, because there are so many people watching your videos and reading your blog, it's threatening to crash the servers. in fact, you might have to charge.

    LOL

    kookie is a loser

  • kookie, has anyone read your blog yet? fox called you in for an interview? maybe the wsj has put forth a job offer?

    LOL!

  • @UTubekookdetector

    so.. you spent your christmas weekend thinking of me?

    LOL... pathetic.

  • Here' a question. Do you think Kaka cares about making herself look credible? Or is her entire existence here devoted to name calling and similar empty rhetoric.

    I don't even know if she cares how terrible she makes her side look.

  • SILENT: Kaka has a lot of ploys she uses to try to get her opponent off a specific subject.

    I've found that if you stick to a subject she gets frustrated. She probably thinks she's winning a debate when she plays the race card, sad but true.

    She doesn't need references, she goes by real life, her version of it anyways.

  • Off subject? kookie, kookie, kookie..

    you've been the assclown trying to stray off subject. your girlfriend silenttwerp claimed newsroom polls are the same as official election results..

    all she had to do was display a little character, just say, "I (silenttwerp) was wrong and polls are not election results".

    instead she brought you in to try to change the subject.

    your friend made a false claim, and erred in attempting to back it up. and acted like a weasel instead of just admitting it.

  • Oh.. & kookie? you were posting on this board on christmas day while I was enjoying a holiday with family and friends. pathetic. real life again, kiddo. you ought to try it, if there's anyone still speaking with you in sheldon, iowa.

  • real life again kookie.. there's nothing to refute. your opinion is irrelevant.

    ta ta

  • Hey Kaka, what happened to your Tom Tancredo/Daily Kos video. Did you make it go bye-bye because it lacked facts?

    We do accept your concession kiddo. Tata.

  • that video?

    I shoved it up your mother's twat and twisted it, why do you ask?

  • KAKA: Wow kid, you're ratcheting up the personal attacks. Quite amusing. How many people have seen you answer the following question:

    Can you name ONE gov't program that was on budget and on time being implemented?

    For every ONE you come up with, I will give two that weren't in response. Kaka, you and your socks have lots of free time to spend on YT, that's not my fault.

    Hey, are you coming to Sheldon? Going to start sniffing around? Tata.

  • Well, kookie, you insisted I put it back up.

    My video (which was really nothing more than a cable tv clip with some monty python edited in) now has 167 views.. on top of the 3700+ it had before. So... how many people have seen your "reply"?

    Ah, reality. sucks for you, doesn't it?

  • KAKA bravely ran away, she bravely pulled her video (and reloaded it). Kaka, you remind me of the Black Knight sitting there with no appendages, saying -- "We'll call it a draw."

    You must've been really upset last week Kaka to insult my mother. Ahahahaha. What are you going to do about it Kaka? Are you going to drive that rusty old Prius to Sheldon? Come on down.

  • keep trying kookie. it's pathetic, but your reality-challenged opinions of other peoples' moods are mildly amusing.

    hey, my reloaded video has 354 views, which is only 10% of the views it had earlier. how many has your "reply" gotten?

    LMFAO!! tata kookie.

  • Greetings Kaka. You could certainly shut me down (or at least try to) if you can name ONE gov't program that was within its budget and on time being implemented.

    For every one you name, I will name two that weren't. You can't name ONE? Not even one? Kaka, you just can't win this one. However, I did not expect you to concede so quickly.

  • keep trying kookie.. no one cares if you're shut down or not

  • Yes you do Kaka, you've lost your mojo. It must've been a major shot to your ego to have to pull that video I responded to. If you pull it again and reload it, we will adjust our response.

    So, you can't name even ONE gov't program that was within its budget and on time being implemented?

  • Aunt Kaka, you are so weak! Ahahahahaha She bravely ran away, she bravely pulled her cut-and-paste video but our mole informed us about it.

  • KAKA: You coming to Sheldon for a visit? Come on down!

    You dare me to refute your latest Maddow vid? Tell me that you dare me to respond to it.

  • kookie, look at My views and your views. No one cares what you refute. you simply don't matter. Honestly, I don't know why I try to help you by allowing you to know you don't matter.

  • KAKA: Your argument is an ad populum appeal. I would advise you to delve into an introductory book on logic.

    Secondly, you spend an inordinate amount of time on YT. So does the Janiturd.

    Third, you've lost every issue we've ever debated. Good luck in our upcoming health care debate. Mr. Broadcast Engineer, start recording devices now.

  • aw, kookie tries to rushing to the defense again! but this time, kookie didn't rehearse an answer to a made-up question!

    LOL LOL LOL

  • Again, subjective evidence, just as one of your sock puppets used. It was refuted. Sorry! watch?v=ckFqB7aV7FY

    We do however have a real story, not a subjective one pulled from the butt.

    nationalcenter . org/2009/11/fourteen-hospitals­-turn-away-critically . html

  • Let's look at the latest response to your question.

    "If aetna, cigna, and anthem merged.. three c ompanies that wouldn't hire kookie to clean the bathrooms would become one larger company that wouldn't hire kookie to clean the bathrooms."

    She exposes herself again.

    1.Simple Minded

    2.Immature

    3.Irrational

    4.Very Upset.

    5.Incapable of answering

    I actually do feel a bit sad for her.

  • you feel bad for kookie, the porn shop janitor from sheldon iowa? I don't, kookie exists only for the entertainment of others, like a circus animal only stupider.

  • yes, kookie, but if you looked beyond right-wing shit blogs, you'd have found even MORE egregious cases in western Japan very similar to that, just a couple of years ago. people died in the ambulances! but you're still wrong, LOL.

    because you're not talking about the PAYMENT & FUNDING systems, you're talking about the ambulance dispatch system. even trig palin could see that. you're comparing apples and oranges, because you're not very intelligent. this is why no one watches your videos.

  • I've no facts or figures, but I'll bet America is second to none when it comes to dispatching PUBLICLY FUNDED ambulances and PUBLICLY FUNDED 911 operators knowing which hospitals are closest and not on bypass.

    Your comparison is like saying you hate the taste of mcdonald's because the parking lot is too small. As usual, your addiction to right-wing shit blogs has failed you and you've posted an astonishingly childish false comparison. this is the sort of thing that makes you an idiot.

  • Kaka made several other egregious errors too. She implied that Japan has universal health care, but when I asked her what % of health care spending is controlled by the gov't she told me "to look it up on the Internet."

    No surprise there, Kaka didn't even know the answer to her own statement and gets all her info off of the Internet.

    We'll have more Kaka gems tomorrow.

  • Oh, Japan's system is awesome. A friend needed an operation.. she saw the gp of her choice, was referred to the surgeon, scheduled the date, had it done. all in short order. and she didn't pay a thing, it was all covered by the national health. follow-up medication, all provided by the doctor. much better than you have.

  • you be sure to post those "gems" kookie.  and be sure to rehearse an answer to some obscure scenario that no one cares about.

  • "the porn shop janitor from sheldon iowa? I don't, kookie exists only for the entertainment of others, like a circus animal only stupider"

    (All because one person dedicates a blog to making you look stupid?)

    Can you even hear yourself? I really do feel sorry for you. If it weren't for your simpleness you would have more friends, more respect, and maybe people would actually take you seriously.

  • @silentnightwhisper

    I've never see the blog, is the whole thing about me? omg, kookie is pathetic. I'd encourage her to go out and enjoy life, but there's not a lot to do in sheldon, iowa.

    yeah let's compare friends. too bad you'll never see kata's life. but for now, I see your very, very small list. featuring assface the nazi convict.

    pathetic, just like kookie.

  • For those who may be interested, Kaka tried to have an elongated debate with me on another video, see the link I supplied.

    She's been AWOL for some time. The board has received Kaka's concession and we have accepted it.

    Please also note, Kaka can send me messages on Lavaddic's videos, but when I do the same thing to her, I'm a stalker. Concession accepted. Go cut-and-paste some more Michael Moore talking points. Where's the Janitor?

  • For those who may be interested, Kata has been making videos.. but kookie girl has a big ol' crush on KataVideo and stalks him from her home base of Sheldon, Iowa.

    No one cares what you think would happen if exxon merged with walmart and pizza hut. LOL

  • For anyone who might be watching, we've catalogued and refuted dozens of statements made by KATAVIDEO. See

    freewebs . com/professor_enigma/youtubeko­oks . htm#322954006

  • For anyone who might be watching, notice that KATAVIDEO normally doesn't bother with kookie and never bothers with her poorly viewed, poorly made videos. who's the stalker with a big ol' crush on KATAVIDEO? LOL LOL LOL (<--is that exponential enough for you, girlie?)

  • More bigotry from KataVideo:

    "Fat guy at the Chicago Teabagger's Rally is asked a simple question, and cannot answer. Shows the mentality of the teabagger, LOL."

    So you have taken one single person and used that as marking anyone attending a tea party protest as his equal. Why have you not done the same for a couple crazies attending pro-Obama rallies?

    More hypocrisy.

  • why, was he your daddy?

  • Your so unoriginal. You should write a full page thank you to UTubekookdetector for all of the ideas he has given you.

  • never seen kookie girl's page.

    you've never posted a legitimate source for your idiotic claim of the military vote totals from the 2008 presidential election.

  • You really shouldn't let a single person have this much control over you.

    And the correct numbers were 55-45, McCain.

    For the third time, here is the link:

    cnn(dot)com/ELECTION/2008/resu­lts/polls#val=USP00p3

  • that's a poll, not an official election result, LOSER. pathetic.

    you still have not backed up your ridiculous claim of the breakdown of the military vote from the 2008 presidential election.

  • Are you trying to be stupid? I mean really, is that your intent? Not everyone was asked these questions. Do you know nothing of how our balloting system works? Its a scientific poll. 17,836 responded, and these are the results.

    And these are polls from CNN. Not FOX.  If they said Obama had won a majority of the military vote, you wouldn't hesitate for a second to accept it as truth.

  • So.. you're admitting you do not know the military vote from the 2008 presidential election, despite posting some nonsense?

  • I'll admit I seen a poll taken before the election, and an exit poll on CNN that both ring true with my thoughts, and I have yet to see a poll that says otherwise.

    (I also know somebody said something like 'I'd believe McCain won the military vote...." Who was that again?)

  • That was me. I'd believe mccain won the military vote.

    But you claimed he 'did' and have been unable to back it up.

  • I have just backed it up with 2 polls.

    How many polls have you shown me to refute it?

  • polls are not results

    I don't need to produce anything to refute, you're the one making the stupid claim

  • So you have admitted that you would believe a stupid claim?

    Come on, kata. Have some more self-respect than that.

    2 Polls are backing my side of the argument. What is backing yours?

  • What's backing mine? the fact that you can't find any facts to back it up. you posted a claim, can't back it up, and are trying to weasel out of it anyway your can.

  • I have just backed it up with 2 sources. You don't seem to know much about how our balloting system works. Would you like me to explain it to you?

  • you've backed up nothing.. again, polls are not official election results. please explain, I want to see a right-wing moron spin some lies rather than admit a mere mistake.

  • Alright, polls are not official election results. I would love to find the official election results for this category of voters, but guess what? That number does not exist. When people go to vote in the United States they vote on a national, statewide, district, and city levels.

    Only a select view are polled after their ballots are complete. This is how numbers like vote by 'sex, race, religion, etc. are produced.' These numbers are accepted by experts, and are good enough for me as well.

  • Silent, I don't think Kaka is very eager to answer my question: What would she do if Aetna, CIGNA and Anthem merged tomorrow?

    I'm thinking she's trying to avoid painting herself into a corner.

    Remember, Kaka is the girl who suggested that France has universal health coverage, yet about 3/4 of their citizens have some sort of private insurance and France's gov't-run program has been in the red for 2 decades.

    It was a Michael Moorewellian talking point.

  • Yes, lets just look at her previous response to your question:

    "For those who may be interested, Kata has been making videos..but kookie girl has a big ol' crush on KataVideo and stalks him from her home base of Sheldon, Iowa."

    A great display of intellect there.

  • Kaka is all bluff and no stuff.

  • oh, kookie, we all know you want to see my stuff. I guess that mop-jockeying at the sheldon, iowa porn store isn't enough for you.

  • I stay away from porn Kaka, but you bringing it up probably tells us more about you than it does me.

    Accusing one's opponents of what you habitually do.

    We'll ask the question again: What would Kaka do if Aetna, CIGNA & Anthem merged?

    Would Kaka rubber stamp that or oppose it?

  • you don't stay away from porn kookie. your defensiveness betrays you.

    again, we'll just ignore the obscure, meaningless question for which you've been just dying to spill your pre-rehearsed answer. put it on your super-well read blog. I'm sure 'everyone' will see it there.

    LOL

  • As I said before Kaka, you accuse your oppoenents of what you habitually do. You do after all, have a lot of free time.

    As far as being rehearsed, doesn't everyone have an idea what they're going to say? That's a curious statement.

    Kaka, you, I and everyone else knows if you answer you'll end up trapping yourself, as you've done several times before. We have it all archived. Are you that scared of me?

    We accept your concession.

    PS put up another health care video for me to dissect

  • okay, enjoy your archive kookie.

  • and to prove my point, kookie came back with nothing to say (except maybe she's still dying to give her rehearsed answer to a question no one cares about)

  • I cannot show you official election results, because they don't exist.

    However, I can show you 2 polls that both support my side. Again, how many statistics have you shown me?

  • your "statistics" are not official, your "statistics" not count. you made a claim about official numbers you can't back-up, now you're desperately hanging on unofficial polls to back you up. they don't. you lose. go watch some of kookie's stalker videos, he really, really needs the views, LOL

  • Sigh. I'll try again. Let me reword this.

    How many facts, how many stats, how many of anything have you provided to refute my claim?

  • I do not need to provide a damn thing to refute your claim, as I did not make the claim, and your claim is not backed up with any facts.

  • So we can conclude that you are incapable of providing any information that would make anyone believe your side over mine?

  • @silentnightwhisper

    SO, that is the conservatard method? talk out of your ass, and demand to be refuted?

    wrong, silly little girl.

    I do not need to come up with a damned thing.

    you made a claim you cannot back up.

    Where are the elections results? polls are not proof. polls are polls.

    keep squirming, I enjoy watching conservatards make fools of themselves and revel in their complete lack of ethics.

  • Actually, based on the ballots, polls are results. They are educated results, since, as I have already informed you, the real ones do not exist. Again, CNN's exit polls are accepted widely by experts, and produced by experts as well, formulated by a geographical method much too complicated for you to understand.

    The count is 2-0.

    I'll ask again.

    Can we conclude that you are incapable of producing any information that would make your side look more credible over mine?

  • nope. newsroom polls are not official election results. never have been. your lying and squirming is the perfect example of conservatard dishonesty and cheating. I did not post a ridiculous claim, you did. it was never my responsibility to research your idiocy.

    you posted a claim and you can't back it up. thank you for proving beyond a doubt that conservatards are: a) racist, and; b) liars.

    anyone who looks over the history of these comments will see your many, many failures.. LOL!!!!

  • Thank you for showing your bigotry and simple mind once again.

    Your original claim was refuted with exit polls, and now you have nothing you can respond with.

    So can we also conclude that your best means of debate is to mimic a 5 year old by sitting with your arms crossed, and repeating "nope....nope...." with no real substance to back it up?

  • Exit polls are still not official election results. I realize you're just a simple conservatard, but not matter how many times you repeat your lie, it will never be true. No matter what your ideological masters have told you.

    silly girl, you made a claim that you couldn't back up. and now you're doing everything but the honorable thing. how... conservatarded.

  • Very well. I am glad we could clear that up. If you ever get a chance to grow up, or come up with any intellectual response (a poll would be nice) that could disprove what I have said, feel free.

  • Silent,

    Kaka just conceded. She knows in the back of her mind if she answers she'll be ensnared by her previous statements.

    I keep track of her rag better than she does. Kaka has posted ridiculous claims before.

    Just to name one, she claimed France has universal health care, but they do not.

  • France does have universal health care. kookie is universally ignored.

    okay, here's my answer to your totally stupid question:

    If aetna, cigna and anthem merged.. three companies that wouldn't hire kookie to clean the bathrooms would become one larger company that wouldn't hire kookie to clean the bathrooms.

  • And if you would point to a sentence I made where it was 'self-evident' i am a racist, that would sure be nice. But, seeing as you can't I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up....

  • like it said, it was self-evident. I'm not your psychologist.

  • It was 'self-evident'? Those are empty words.

    Your backed into a corner. I said nothing racist. You seen the word 'racism'' and your emotions told you to jump on it.

  • No military would ever vote for someone as weak as Barack Obama. Anyone who says 'I'm going to send more troops, but start pulling out in 18 months, whether we have succeeded by then or not.' really can't be too great of a commander in chief. That would be like Nick Saban telling his team tonight, 'okay guys we're gonna go play florida for 3 hours and 10 minutes. If we don't win by then we'll go home'. The only reason Obama didn't get totally destroyed in the military vote is due to racism.

  • opinions based in your own fears and racism. meaningless.

  • Comment removed

  • Opinions based on my own fears and racism.... Give me ONE single fact that makes that statement true. Or can you?

  • you first. you've yet to produce the source of your ridiculous claim of the military vote spread. you didn't know and made something up that you thought you might have overheard, and tried to pawn it off on non-existent sources. the racism in your comment was self-evident. don't come to me for help with that, see a psychologist.

  • "The racism in your comment was self-evident."

    Alright, give me one sentence that proves I am a racist. Come on. Its so 'self-evident'.

    You wouldn't be making empty accusations would you?

    Here is the page that I got those numbers from.

    militarytimes(dot)com/static/p­rojects/pages/081003_ep_2pp(do­t)pdf

    Now, how about you show me a page where it says more troops would vote Obama?

  • That's not the election results, that's a POLL.. LOL!!!!

    come on, where's your proof?

  • There is no poll numbers for active military only, that would be impossible. But, if you want to look at CNN's exit polls, they have a number that shows anyone who has ever been a member of the military voted McCain 55-45. I am still right, even if you look at that number.

    I think you know the statement 'us troops say obama for president' is very incorrect.

  • why would it be impossible?  the only impossible thing is for you to post a link to the ridiculous claim you made.

  • Fine, I was wrong about 68%. It doesn't matter. If it were 51% to 49% I would still be right

  • I'd believe mccain won a majority of 51% to 49%, give or take 5-6 points

  • You have just admitted that you were wrong. Thank you. I'm glad I could correct you.

  • I was never incorrect. you know nothing of headline writing or the English language.

    glad I could string you along.

  • KataVideo: Troops to US: Obama for President!

    KataVideo(after being educated): I'd believe McCain won a majority of 51%-49% give or take 5-6 points.

    Your welcome. (And learn to 'string' your rhetoric together better. That last comment made 0 sense).

  • that is what I wrote. Troops to US: Obama for President!

    Does it say "all" troops? LOL!

  • Hahaha, that way to dance around you chicken shit. Funny how you didn't just say that first.

    How about you try to defend your claim that I am a racist? (I mean...without the immaturity).

  • you brought up race first. you claimed Obama got military votes because of racism.

  • Your not answering the question. What statement did I make that makes me a racist? Try to stop running in circles.

  • you brought up race first. there was no question of race, until you brought it in. Obama got votes because of racism? tsk tsk tsk tsk.

  • Bringing up race isn't racist. Are you saying Obama would have got just as many votes if he was white?

  • if you're saying Obama won because he's black, then you must acknowledge that dimwits and boneheads also voted the other way because Obama is black.

    bringing up race first is racist. the convo had nothing to do with race.

  • Of course Obama wouldn't have lost if he were white, but saying he would have got just as many votes is pathetic. Rappers and Oprah don't praise someone all of a sudden because of they're politics.

    I'll let you try again. What did I say that makes me racist. Calling out racism isn't racist bud.

  • everything you're saying is racist. I'm merely allowing you all the rope you need. Oprah? rappers? threatened much? LOL

  • Yes, oprah.  Wait...didn't she attend the same racist church where the bigot Wright preaches? The same one Obama belonged to for 20 years?

    I have yet to see you quote me on a single racist sentence.

    The dots are all there. Your just too afraid and too big of a sheep to connect them. And 'lol' all you want. People usually do that when they need to make themselves feel more secure.

  • you're a very ignorant conservatard. just because you haven't typed the n-word, you honestly think all of this crap isn't racist? of course you know it is. I'll just keep doling out the rope.

  • I have yet to see you quote be on a single racist sentence.

  • all of it

  • Just admit it. You can't. You can't provide even one sentence, even when its so 'self-evident'.

  • I don't need to. Every sentence you've written bringing race into IS racist! lol@u.. have some more rope.

  • "I don't need to"

    Translation: "I can't"

    Racism is not defined as 'bringing race into a discussion'.

    Provide me with a single sentence that proves I am a racist.

  • I don't need to.

    translation into conservatard: duh, sarah plain an' jesus dun' got sum mountain dew an' went to dee monster truck show.

    The fact that you're oblivious to the way you brought race into it is completely fucking hilarious to me.

  • Your maturity shows again. I brought race into it by stating that the only reason Obama didn't lose the military vote by more is because he's black. That's not racist. That's an educated opinion.

    I could say the vice-versa about McCain. I bet you wouldn't be playing the race card if I had said that would you?

  • you brought race into it because you're a racist

  • Alright, good job. Now back it up with some facts.

  • all of the statements on race you've made.

  • One...just one. Quote me on it. Try to make yourself look credible.

  • quote yourself, everytime you inappropriately brought race into it. do you own homework. it's all right there.

  • You really can't can you? 'Its all right there'. Do you know how empty that statement is? Your a 'typical' liberal. You will point fingers all day long, but when you are asked to justify it, you fail.

  • all you have to do is look at everytime you introduced race into a discussion that had nothing to do with race. try it with your psychologist.

  • (Yes, psychologist again. I got that part.)

    You obviously are unable to quote me on one single instance. Your embarrassing yourself.

  • quote yourself. everytime you inappropriately brought race into it, when it wasn't a racial issue.

  • Alright, I will. "The only reason Obama didn't get totally destroyed in the military vote is due to racism."

    That is my opinion. It is an educated guess. I would say the same about McCain or money that went to the Obama campaign. Race played a factor. And I believe that blacks were racist in wanting the first black president (even if they didn't know it).

    Now I suggest you try to explain what is racist about that, or you may continue to post comments that ring with cowardice.

  • an "uneducated" guess would be more accurate

  • Medicaid recipients from NJ and gentlemen. This KakaVideo character once told me: "I don't need references, I go by real life." We have this commente archived.

    In addition, check out freewebs . com/professor_enigma/youtubeko­oks . htm#322954006

    We archived Kaka';s comments from another video, this lady loves to copy Michael Moore, but doesn't like it when you point out Moore's errors; Tata.

  • yes, by all means, become the second person to visit kookie's website.. LOL

  • I think Kaka's getting a bit uncomfortable over here. Your usage of LOL increases exponentially when you're frustrated Kaka.

    Now, are you going to admit that you copied from Sicko and you were incorrect about universal health care in France and Europe en masse?

    Mr. Broadcast Engineer, start recording devices now.

  • Yes, i pointed out to her that using 'LOL' frequently at the end of each comment is a method to feel more secure with oneself.

  • LOL LOL LOL

    you don't know a thing, kookie. you imagine you know something about a person you've never met and cannot see. in truth, people laugh at you.

  • Ok, I think Kaka is conceding her copied point from Michael Moore. I do have another question for you Kaka:

    If AETNA, CIGNA and Anthem all merged tomorrow, what would your reaction be?

  • answer your own question, stalker.. LOLx10

  • what's that incredibly effeminate tag line of yours?

    oh yeah

    TA TA

  • We'll ask Kaka one more time: What would YOU do if Aetna, CIGNA and Anthem all merged tomorrow?

    Why are you being timid Kaka? Usually you aren't shy about pontificating. Are you afraid you're going to slip up?

  • Kata, I often wonder if I am on the right side of the political fence. Maybe the democrats and liberals really do have it right. We need to convert to a socialistic government. Capitalism is dead. Obama is the greatest president we have ever had.

    And then...I meet someone on youtube with the username 'KataVideo'....and i am reassured. So, thank you. And I really do mean it.

  • socialistic? you already have a small measure of socialistic government. you grew up in it.

    Democrats aren't advocating socialism, that's just conservatard nonsense.. all conservatardism starts with a lie.

    capitalism?

    you will perform dozens and dozens of capitalist transactions before the week is out, and very few socialist.

    No one ever said Obama is the greatest.

    That's another conservatard lie, you guys called him "messiah" and "the one".

    your choking on your own lying talking points.

  • Thanks again. Care to defend your hypocrisy? You accused me of bigotry and you making a statement like 'duh, sarah plain, an' jesus, went and got some moutain dew and went to a monster truck show.'

  • Oh, I'm prejudiced against hypocristians. tough.

  • Can't do that either? That's okay.  When someone has to endure the embarrassment that you have defending oneself is a hard feat to accomplish.

  • your definitions don't matter and I won't address them. you really haven't noticed that I don't defend myself to the likes of you or kookie? even kookie picks that up every now and then.. not too often, but occasionally. that's hilarious that you think you can demand that someone else should play defense, especially when your posts were blatantly racist.

  • You can't defend your statements, I got it.

    Kookie? Did he really have that much of an impact on you? You really shouldn't let one person have that much control over you. No matter how embarrassing 50 pages of material exposing you and your fellow sheep is...

  • I don't need to defend my statements, and I never need to justify my statements to conservatards.

    You're a racist. you proved that.

  • "I don't need to defend my statements, and I never need to justify my statements to convervatards."

    That's kind of you in a nutshell, isn't it? As soon as logic fails and your narrow mind establishes that it is safe to start the name calling, you think assertions can be made without anything to back them up. Kind of rings true with

    "I don't need references. I go by real life."

    You'd be much better off if you grew up and gained just a wee bit of tolerance for other's beliefs.