The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC)

[PyroChemicals2]

The fact that people continue to defend corporal punishment of children makes me sick. Pick on somebody your own size you sackless morons.

[nellydoggiemom]

For those of you FREAKING OUT and posting that the UNCRC is going to usurp parental rights completely or that this is an avenue for the UN to take over the US.....

...how many of you have actually READ the document...or are you solely responding based on what others have told you???

If you haven't read the document, you have NO RIGHT to comment!!!!

[dayspeace]

this is a very informative video. It is nice to know that people still cares for children's right.

[MultiAcer123]

i think its good someone cares

[IndyB25]

The old saying of "Children should only be seen but not heard" is WRONG. Children should have the right to question adults because sometimes adults will take advantage of children by telling them what to do when they want to do something else. There a couple exceptions to this hence children misbehaving or not wanting to go to school, but other than that children should have the freedom to do what they want to do outside of school and when they misbehave.

[Blasthood]

@IndyB25 Rights do not exist, they're just formality created by the humans just to make it "official".

Secondly, people are free to do whatever they, now law can stop you to do what you wish for the only obstacle is yourself since you make that decision. You're free just as anyone else, but fighting for "freedom" is the stupidest thing you could do, oh wait you're American! You're whole country is based on such a flawed concept. Forget me then my words are wasted on you.

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood Freedom is not a flawed concept. Allowing parents to abuse and even kill their kids because of religious freedom or the fact that they came from their bodies is in fact evil.

[Blasthood]

@apologeticsman It's evil under your perspective, however, some people think it's not. Who's correct? You think you're right and they think they're right on this issue.

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood God.

[Blasthood]

@apologeticsman Among the thousand religions which "god/s" then is right? They advocate different moralities too, and it's the same thing all over again, since everyone thinks their "god" is the righteous one.

There is no "god"-

[apologeticsman]

Morality can not be personal, or anyone could claim that their actions are justified because it's what they believe. If a person truly believes that murder is Godly, he can't be punished because it was HIS MORALITY. That is why we have the Bible, because the only true God gave it to us to show us the difference between right and wrong, and good and evil, and to show us the only remedy for sin, i.e. Jesus. All other religions either poorly copy the faith of the Bible, or twist the Bible

[Blasthood]

@apologeticsman You fail at reasoning and even in history. Before the bible was even written there were already many religions, so how can you claim that these religions copied your fairytale? When evil and good do not exist either in their absolute sense. You sir are deluded.

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood The Bible is a collection of 66 books that were written from as far back as 9,000 years ago. They were not all compiled into a single book, but they chronicle God's creation of the world, the creation of man, the beginning of sin and death and then they tell us how God dealt with people and ultimately what He did for us as Jesus. There were no religions before Adam and Eve, and while there were pagans that came after them and did not believe in God as the Jews did--cont

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood cont-- those pagan "religions" were purely man's invention, and not revealed by God. The idea of several gods is false on many levels, one because a god who is subordinate is not almighty, thus incapable of deserving worship, and because God can not have a beginning. The Bible is a historical document and is our only true and lasting guide to the only truth there is. It's moral codes are either changed, ignored or done away with in other religions, and that is the proof against them

[Blasthood]

@apologeticsman First off, it's funny because the bible says that the Earth is roughly aged 6000 years old. So it is impossible for your books to be more than 9000 years ago. Secondly, the other religions think the same of your religion as being fake and made up by the likes of you. You both claim to be right whereas evidence is pointing that neither of you are correct. It's funny because you really do not see the contradictions and inconsistencies of the bible you so love.

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood No, that is not what the Bible says, that is what a certain percentage of evangelical Christians say, but that is not accurate. The difference between the God of the Bible and other so called gods and religions is very pronounced, especially when one examines them historically, scientifically, and philosophically, Also, it is evident that all pagan and other world religions are but shadows and or rip offs of the faith of the Bible.

[apologeticsman]

@Blasthood did you know that many cultures have a flood story in their history, but the Bible is the only one that puts the flood account in real times and places,and gives logical and even scientific details about it? It's obvious that the other cultures took their flood stories from the Bible or from legends passed down by their pagan predecessors who descended from survivors of the flood, but did not have an accurate record of it.

[Blasthood]

@apologeticsman Are you insane? Are you really that blinded by your own religion? Do you realise that what you write here is nonsense to the extreme? You're inventing "facts" out of the blue to defend your bible (although i did not expect any less than from religious like yourself) and i am quite sure you'd also kill for it blind folded if we were still in medieval times during the crusades. You'd do it without questioning your own beliefs and just go with what your leaders tell you to do.

[Clammypollack]

Oppose this travesty of a treaty.

I'm sure some third world countries which don't have all the protections in place like we do in America could use the treaty. We don't need it. We have family courts, child protective services and mandatory reporting of any suspected abuse or neglect.

This treaty seeks to take away the rights of American parents to direct the upbringing of their children and it hands those rights to the UN.

This is evil and would undermineone of the foundations of America

[selamusicaustria]

Here I am - with a right for love

A musical statement on child protection and children's rights.

A song for love, respect and security.

Children have contributed to the text of the song "Here I Am" by defining what "child safety" means for them. They sing this song from their perspective.

"Let's live in peace and dignity (...) Warmth, shelter, love, and care, no one should have to despair."

SOS Child Protection Song

Music & Lyrics: Frank Posch

[usmcoth]

Just one more government taking children away from their heritage, their parents and their families by someone who thinks that they are not happy because they need to pay taxes.

WheresDADDY org

AChildsRights org

[natashiamerie]

This is very misleading. The don't tell your kids that the government wants to control them and influence them in every aspect of life rather than letting their parents raise their kids as they see fit.

[BigLa0]

@natashiamerie Government doesn't own kids. Parents don't own "their" kids. You can't own another person: that is called slavery. Children should be allowed to live and prosper in healthy and safe ways until their mind is mature enough to make their own decisions regarding "their" life. This is what they are trying to achieve.

[c0ler0cks]

hey @cradub, awesome video :D mind if i show it at a project's presentation?

[GenX6887]

It's bullshit that animals have more right in America than our own children do. Enough is enough, children deserve to have the same basic human rights that we adults take for granted. We Americans also take our freedom for granted. Those of us who never served in the military that is.

[themanofthepast]

Look up:

"Forced Healthcare And Vaccinations - Government Kidnaps Child Of Anti-Vax Parents"

I wouldn't be at all surprised if a lot of people who liked this UNCRC video would think the parents of this kid deserved to have him taken away just because they don't trust vaccines.

Bleat it.

[tamagochiflower]

ok....

[rickster348]

kids can't make important decisions. That's reality.

this will change nothing in my house.

[zioband]

GREAT..creativity..aLIVE

[jord27941]

janey mack! Would you's all calm down! The only Nazi's are you's who are controlling the fact that children are as much a human being as yourself, these rights protect a child no matter what country they are from because not all countries are a brilliant as your precious america that you talk of!

[GetRealPolitik]

This is terrible! Oppose this, America! Let us not submit our sovereignty and our freedoms to this trash. Previous to this, I was ambivalent to our presence in the UN; surely a little trade-off of national sovereignty to acheive greater peace is a noble action right?

Wrong. Instead of promoting peace between nations, the UN has been used by dictatorships to set the standard for human rights, by our enemies to retard our power, and by collectivist nations to impose upon us Social Progressivism.

[apologeticsman]

@GetRealPolitik So people getting together and agreeing on rules in war is ok, but not getting together and agreeing that kids should have rights and freedoms just like adults do? Something is not right there buddy.

[GetRealPolitik]

@apologeticsman; Nations can agree on ground rules for war, but it's just as silly as insisting that the UN should try them for war crimes. The UN is not and should not be a governing body. How does the UN plan to enforce this except by infringing on national sovereignty?

Nobody likes child abuse, but this would put far too much power in a small number of hands. Worse abuse would happen under such tyranny. It always does.

[apologeticsman]

@GetRealPolitik There is no nation that has the right to murder, experiment on or enslave innocent civilians, no matter what their idealism is. Had the US been in favor of slavery in modern times, some nation or nations with a conscience would have and should force us to either free them, or pay a heavy penalty. The Jews did not belong to the nation of Germany, just because they lived there, and children do not belong to any nation or person either.

[GetRealPolitik]

@apologeticsman; I can't stand with you on that. Child abuse is more subjective than murder, and even then I can't say it's any nation's responsibility to stop wrongdoing of any kind in another country.

Certainly a treaty by the most ineffective international body in world history is not going to do anything. If good Christians want to spread freedom and human rights ourselves, then we ought to do it with our own hands, not with the hands of others to command.

[minnesotastategop]

When the UN succeeds in establishing the NWO the only right our children or any of us will have is the right to die for the greater good of socialism.

[ligerman30]

The only rights this takes away is the right to be a nazi parent. So, yeah freedom of speech and thought sucks we need more people to be brainwashed and opressed by their parents. Makes alot of fucking sense.

[realrell36]

fuck childrens rights

[thomaspaine2000]

All these "rights" are granted to children already in the US. Only without the oversight of the UN, thank you very much. The result of ratifying the UN CRC will be to give away our sovereignty, and our rights to raise our children in ways we see fit. The UN CRC will undermine the very thing children need; parents who are guaranteed the right to raise them.

[videopig]

@thomaspaine2000

These rights are there guide states to ensure that every child has what they need.

There's no actual legal mechanism to prosecute under the treaty, so there's no threat to sovereignty. Its a reassurance from your government that they are working towards children's rights.

When it's you and Somalia vs the rest of the world, you may need to reconsider what side you're on.

[thomaspaine2000]

@videopig Sorry, all your statements are misguided or just plain wrong. What exactly is missing in our laws that children need to be better off?

The treaty wuld be binding on us, read the constitution.

Somalia or whomever... has nothing to do with it.

[Clammypollack]

This treaty must be opposed by all Americans. It will cause our nation to lose its sovereignty to the UN. We already have laws protecting children and courts specifically designed to uphold those laws. Any ratified treaty automatically becoomes the law of the land and our own laws and American parents will be scrutinized by some foreign officials. They make it sound pretty but it is ugly and it undermines the rights of American parents and US law. OPPOSE IT if you love your freedom.

[ElGanador]

Uh, I've always interpreted the Rights of the Child as saying that children should not be abused, that they should be looked after by responsible adults absent their parents, that they shouldn't be forced into conflict or involuntary labor, and they should be treated with as much dignity as the state or individual would treat an adult. Just sayin'.

[ElGanador]

ETA from the CRC:

..Shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents.

[Kalahridudex]

get it through you thick skulls!!! we are not trying to tell people hot to live as individuals, we are trying to tell people not to tell other people how to live as individuals!

[Kalahridudex]

parental rights is the new-speak(Orwellian) term for parental authority, because a child is a human being separate from his or her parents. and "parental rights" basically give authority to the parents

[kdurston1]

children are not separate from their parents. children are the sole province of their family, not the state. your ideas are completely totalitarian... reminiscent of the fascists and communists. "those pesky parents and their backward ideas, we need to protect the next generation from them." Orwell was criticizing YOUR beliefs about the family, not ours. Maybe you should actually read Orwells' collected works before throwing his name about on such a topic.

[Kalahridudex]

there is a fucking straw man right there! i never said kids should spy on there family as Orwell described in 1984, i said kids should have more individual rights. i never staid kids should belong to the state either, also, how is parents having to much power NOT totalitarian?isnt that like the definition of totalitarianism, people in authority controlling absurdly too many aspects of people's lives?

[kdurston1]

No that is NOT the definition of totalitarianism. google it. if the state is legislating a distancing of parental control from their children who is exercising authority over families internal dynamics? you are creating the strawman suggesting since a minority of parents are abusive, therefore all parents have too much power. by extension, your implying all parents are unable to discern reasonable force without the rule of the state. indeed, these are non sequiturs as well as strawmen.

[loymonteiro]

It's our governments job and all the grownups have to do their best??what??

This is not what the Bible tells us..?

[indydm011]

I think you all are missing the point...this isn't about parental rights. Nobody is trying to tell you how you raise your children. This is about giving children safety and looking after their well-being. Most namely it will ensure access to a high-quality education and CERTIFIED teachers. To clarify, the only instance in which I would permit homeschooling would be if the parent is an officially certified teacher who is qualified to teach in the ed. system.

[Ralyns]

"I think you all are missing the point...this isn't about parental rights. Nobody is trying to tell you how you raise your children."

No - you're missing the point. Have you actually read any of this? This basically terminates parental rights and gives the government full power over our children.

This is about govt usurping parental rights and controlling the youth with parents being helpless to do anything about it.

[Ralyns]

Let me correct that - it gives the UN full power over our children, not even our own government...

[Kalahridudex]

get it through your thick skull! This provision is not trying to give all of the parental right to the UN, its trying to give them directly to the kids.

[kdurston1]

so you seriously believe a 5 your old child can understand, exercise and critically review their so called individual rights? or are you going to suggest a government agency to assist kids in working said actions. by necessity you are giving power to the state rather than the child. your logic doesn't pan out. you can say your trying to help kids, but every outcome ends in usurping parental authority and giving it to the unaccountable state.

[Kalahridudex]

im for gradually reducing parental power (parental rights if you prefer newspeak) as the kid gets older.

[kdurston1]

here again, you have not done your research. parental authority naturally diminishes with time anyway. thus your suggestion is moot. you seem to presuppose that power is a negative trait. "newspeak" if you will. yet you promote kids "rights" being entrusted to the power of the state and the UN, where parents have no input into the policies and "rights" being imposed.

[kdurston1]

so the question is who is into exercising abusive power? who's defining abuse? how are they profiting from it? my way has a small number of kids abused by their parents. your way has everyone abused by the state. justify these to me without misusing Orwell's text.

[Kalahridudex]

yes, parental authority diminishes naturally in a healthy relationship, but not always, so we need to make it diminish so that when the person is grown up, he is capable of being independent.

[kdurston1]

so you concede the argument. you endorse imposing, non representative, state control over the internal family dynamics by unaccountable state power, irregardless of established liberal rights regarding freedom of religion, culture, and the dignity of the family. ergo your a (more than likely unwitting) fascist. before responding with an ad hominem accusation, google fascist policy regarding family.

[indydm011]

Exactly. What it will do is remove a parent's "right" to "opt out" of giving their child a proper education. And their "right" to throw them down a flight of stairs as a form of discipline.

Have you ever read A Child Called It? Pick up a copy, and THEN talk to me about parental "rights".

[Ralyns]

After seeing and hearing what is going on in the schools lately - I can fully understand why more parents are homeschooling. The public education system has gotten crappy and brainwashes kids into secular activities.

The Parental Rights amendment still allows for intervention in the case of real abuse - so your objections are mute. AND there is a very real problem with what they are calling abuse these days, only 3% of the kids in the system are actually abused.

[Ralyns]

They seem to ignore the actually abused kids and have turned it all into a child marketing racket by falsely accusing mostly indigent people that can't afford to fight back - wake up.

I'm not for abuse, those kids need help, but I am against tearing families apart simply because you're poor or somebody doesn't like your style of living or your values.

[kdurston1]

one needs to have teaching certificate to teach a kid to read and do math? come on, that is so asinine. so long as the kid passes the standardized testing all's well. and your right, it is about parental authority. an authority that is completely justifiable and wholesome. i'm more scared of lunatics telling others how to live their lives and run their families... that's just unhealthy.

[Kalahridudex]

these people only know how to make strawmen.

[jeannedarc624]

creepy

[pyxsis]

Isn't that sweet ! Big brother un will own all the children - what a utopia. These freaks want to take your parental and national rights and sell it to you as compasion.

[Kalahridudex]

power needs to be spread out as much as humanly fucking possible, which is why im mostly against parental rights, it vests too much power over a person in just 2 people (sometimes 1).

[JohananRaatz]

Well we have to go for the reasonable middle-ground. On the one side we don't want parents getting away with abusing their kids, but on the other it's good for kids to learn respect for authority and such. You know parents still have to be able rear their children.

[Kalahridudex]

respect for authority should be mild. authoritarianism is one of the worlds biggest problems. i know i will get an ass-load of backlash for saying this but.. authoritarian parents need to loose custody.

[JohananRaatz]

But I guess what I'm getting at is what is the demarking line here? Like I wouldn't say for example that parents that give their kids occasional spankings when they do something bad would be authoritarian -although occasionally others would.

[deke76]

How about we start taking away custody starting with your kids? No parent "needs" to lose custody provided they aren't harming a child directly.

[mountain19]

out gunned and numbered by the gov. agenda set. murdoch owns all the media so most parents wont know their rights taken and their children will willingly go along till they realize when it is too late as they wont be treated as they were when first taken. lost in the mix of fed. tax funding/laundering for the military black budget!!!!!!!

[Kalahridudex]

FUCK THE PARENTAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT!

[JohananRaatz]

Parental Rights Amendment?

[Kalahridudex]

there are a bunch of rightwing loons trying to pass a constitutional amendment in the US that will give parents near-absolute power over there kids.

[JohananRaatz]

"in the US that will give parents near-absolute power over there kids."

Specify "near-absolute power." What in particular does this entail?

"there are a bunch of rightwing loons"

As opposed to leftwing ones?

[Kalahridudex]

near absolute like, parents get to do anything and everything that is not sexual abuse, and severe physical abuse.

[JohananRaatz]

Ok that's reasonable then. I had just heard though that the this convention had banned other things as well including reasonable levels of spanking, home schooling, and religious instruction.

[Kalahridudex]

spanking is assult and is never reasonable, you would get your ass handed to you in court if you do it to someone who is not your kid. as far as homeschooling, that should definately be banned because that compromises a child's chance to be educated, only proffesional teachers should be allowed to homeschool, as for religious instruction, that is legal, but a parent may nor force it.

[JohananRaatz]

Come on this is unreasonable. Spanking is a form of behavioral conditioning and behavioral conditioning has been proven to work by Ivan Pavlov. It's called Pavlovian conditioning. I don't see how anyone in this scientific age could oppose spanking seeing this.

As for homeschooling I was homeschooled. And I did very well. I'm a physics major and I've written a novel. If you look at the other stats on this homeschoolers do better than nonhomeschoolers.

It's pretty extremist to try to ban it.

[deke76]

You are an idiot if you think schools are always better educators than homeschooling. The standard of education in the US has done nothing but decline since the Federal government took it over. This UN nonsense is nothing but tyranny.

[WarDog229A]

Luckily you aren't the one who gets to make the decision on what's right and what's not. You have every right to express your point of view. You do not have the right to say what a family can teach their children or not. The USA was founded on the principles of freedom from an oppressive and intrusive government. Because this may not affect you directly doesn't give you any right whatsoever to tell anyone else how to live or behave. You keep your opinion and I'll keep my freedoms.

[loymonteiro]

None of your business really..

[GLBTQcommunity]

he sounds like Linus from Peanuts

[cradub]

You're right he does! Thanks for popping by!

[oilhammer04]

This treaty would be a way for radical judges to make activist rulings here. It is useless in forcing proper conduct in countries that have signed it and have bad human rights violations. America should *not* sign this bad treaty.

[bixby2000]

"The animation is aimed at children".

Really ?

Mmh. I think grown ups, very big and important people should watch these 2 simple minutes.

Sometimes I dream that like in the story of Stephen King we, sad, bad, useless and silly grown ups would all disappear, leaving only children and youth under 18. I'm sure they would manage better without us. Thanks for this video, sometimes I need to believe there are texts that may change the world.

[terri3gs]

yeah ok...I wish someone would try to take away my parental rights.

[childrescuer]

There is a holocaust going on in the USA and Canada of government agents kidnapping and TRAFFICKING IN CHILDREN to finance political campaigns. The courts drag on CPS cases for years because they get paid for showing up. The children are being imprisoned in institutions where they are drugged with dangerous psyche meds not meant for kids. They are also sodomized, victims of child prostitution, and this is done by civil servants. Interpol needs to investigate politicians and the money trail.

[cuchulain55]

hurt or hit in anyway ever. Or be hurt both physically or  emotionally and mentally.

[SEATTLEGRL1]

Thank goodness for the the United Nations as to children rights!

[chasecat]

I think this video is really good! It helps younger children to be able to understand the UNCRC... :D :D

[Crystalliod]

Very Good Material For Children Education...Thanx for uploading, Simple & Convenient

[godchaser33]

UN propaganda. The Convention for the Rights of the Child just assists in destroying the United States' national sovereignty. It is neither the role nor the right of the UN to even propose this, much less enforce it.

Please USA, do what's RIGHT. Get OUT of the UN.

[ComputerNerd1993]

Who told you that BS?

Maybe you want to reduce your children's rights.

If the USA Got out of the UN it will be seen as a dictatorship.

[godchaser33]

First off, anyone who does some research can see the UN's agenda and the CFR's influence on our government and in the UN -- you can't argue the facts.

Secondly, I wouldn't want to reduce any child's "rights", however it's not the UN's job to even begin to enforce legislation that protects "rights" by overiding our laws.

The USA may not be a dictatorship, but the fact remains that our liberty is being destroyed as we speak (and the UN contributes to much of that). Why do you like the UN?

[ComputerNerd1993]

I can't argue facts, but facts are NOT what you are mentioning.

To do "research" I will need to go to the USA and read in your library's which are filled with BS anyway.

I do research but I use my country's more reliably media.

[godchaser33]

Logical fallacies.

Hasty Generalization - you just claimed that ALL of our libraries are filled with BS, which is a fallacy. Regardless, though, I'm not supporting my argument with what a library has said, but what US law says and what research institutions have said ABOUT US law.

Secondly, what country are you from and what makes their media more reliable? Regardless, I'm not basing my arguments from the "media", but law.

But you still did not answer my question: Why do you like the UN?

[Kumari58787]

We will crush all dissidents and rights violaters, including Nazis.

[cuchulain55]

The U.N. is more important then the United States or anyone nation  by itself.

[eatmorchikin33]

You assert. Please prove.

[Kumari58787]

I smell a Nazi.

[eatmorchikin33]

Nazism is the exact philosophy that this convention is based upon. This convention "creates" rights, and then strips the family of it's right to provide these rights for their children and gives that responsibility to a government -- in this case, the UN.

That's what Nazi Germany did -- it redefined the family and put the government in charge of the kids (think "Nazi Youth").

That's Nazism.

"Give me liberty, or give me death!" - Patrick Henry

[deraickripper]

asshole

[Kalahridudex]

ideot, the convention vests the excess rights in the kids themselves, not parents

[eatmorchikin33]

Exactly. And that's where the problem is. Most of the "rights" outlined in the UNCRC aren't rights at all. Instead, these "rights" trample on the real rights of the parents. How? Most of the rights outlined in the UNCRC are supposed to be "given" by the government instead of protected by the parents. Parental authority is stripped away. That's downright wrong. (And by the way, I do not say this as a parent. I am only 19 years old.)

[Kalahridudex]

parents dont (or at leats should not have) have an epic crapload of rights

[Ralyns]

Kalahridudex:

You are pathetic. How about if we just take everybody's kids away and be done with it. Let the govt & CPS raise them all so that they are brainwashed into being their little minions, have no authority and moral teachings, feel unloved, are corrupted into being homosexuals and other secular activities - because that is their right to take away our parental rights to do with our children what they want?

Not on my watch...

[ligerman30]

@eatmorchikin33 Shut the fuck up, child rights allow children freedom of speech and thought. The only "liberty" it's taking away is that to treat teens like a fucking pawn. Don't tell be about "liberty" you fucking nazi who doesn't fucking like that shit.

[eatmorchikin33]

@ligerman30 First, if you actually take time to dissect your comment word for word, it is pretty substance-less. The use of insulting curse words do not make your position any stronger.

Second, I really don't feel a need to reply to your comment's "argument" (accusation) in particular because I already addressed this Nazi insult months ago in a previous comment on this forum. Please feel free to check that one out.

[ligerman30]

@eatmorchikin33 you need to read it moron before going nazi on me.

[ligerman30]

@eatmorchikin33 the list of things it ensured are as follows:

Freedom of speech

Freedom of thought

Freedom from fear

Freedom of choice and the right to make decisions

Ownership over one's body

anybody who hate's any one of these things is a nazi.

[TheUSELECTIONS]

@eatmorchikin33

really ? IN THE US CHILDREN ARE SLVES OF PARENTS ! THEY DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AND TO LEARN WHAT THEY WANT !CHRISTIAN RADICAL GROUPS SAY ABORTION IS WRONG BECAUSE A CHILD DOES NOT IS AN INDIVIDUAL BUT PARENTS ARE ALLOWED TO TELL CHILDREN HOW TO BELIEVE IN GOD HOW TO LOVE WHO TO LOVE ... KIDS ARE FREE ! IF THEY DON'T WANNA STUDY THE BIBLE IT IS OKAY ! KIDS DO NOT MAKE RIGHT DECISIONS BUT IF YOU TELL THEM THAT SEX IS BAD THAT GAYS ARE BAD THAT SOMEONE IS BAD

[TheUSELECTIONS]

really ? IN THE US CHILDREN ARE SLVES OF PARENTS ! THEY DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AND TO LEARN WHAT THEY WANT !CHRISTIAN RADICAL GROUPS SAY ABORTION IS WRONG BECAUSE A CHILD DOES NOT IS AN INDIVIDUAL BUT PARENTS ARE ALLOWED TO TELL CHILDREN HOW TO BELIEVE IN GOD HOW TO LOVE WHO TO LOVE ... KIDS ARE FREE ! IF THEY DON'T WANNA STUDY THE BIBLE IT IS OKAY ! KIDS DO NOT MAKE RIGHT DECISIONS BUT IF YOU TELL THEM THAT SEX IS BAD THAT GAYS ARE BAD THAT SOMEONE IS BAD THEY BELIEVE IT !!!!

[luiklessard]

@TheUSELECTIONS keep off the caps lock because it's just like if you scream in someones ear: IT'S RUDE.

[Bozewani]

@eatmorchikin33 Only if you believe in the medieval idea that rights confer duties.

Parents who oppose this convention are basically domestic Hitlers who do not like circumscribed authority

[Kumari58787]

That is right.

[Blackfish100]

What are you talking about? The U.S helped found the International Convention for the Rights of the Child. It also helped found the U.N.

[shazeemakbar]

This is a good video on educating children and making them aware of their rights in a simplified way which they can understand.

[penpolmedia]

This is a great animation. We did a similar project with our Year 6 pupils and got them to make a musical animation using flash. Check it out - 'A Right to Life'.

[majtytajger]

Tina! Kolla på