For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe. On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself." ~ P. C. W. Davies.
Are you saying, the universe is eternal in by means of singularity?
@spiritring Paul Davies? cool I read his books as a teenager. He just described that we cant predict beyond the big bang. The singularity may have been eternal, or the density may not go all the way to a singularity before spawning of some hyperspace multiverse, like a bubble inflating off a foam of universes, or an ocean of spacetime. there are many other options, we just don't know how to test them yet.
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke (or, perhaps the singularity isn't eternal but popped out of nothingness by some process like energy-time heisenberg uncertainty principle)
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke or an ocean of spacetime - big bang though is tested and you know vacuum fluctuations cannot occur when space itself was not present. It is no explosion at all on a pre - existing space RATHER the expansion of space itself. The other options are string models which are the ones done in paper and in/math, but does not necessarlly happen in reality.
@spiritring well ya, all speculations of what happened before the big bang are just that, speculations. All that is confirmed is that it was veeeery dense about 13.72 billions years ago
@spiritring 1)where did i say small space at state of eternal non expansion? 2)Einstein's space time theorems all would zero time and space? please revisit this sentence and make it make sense. 3)The universe does not always follow the rules of einstein's relativity as you should know.
@spiritring Again relativity only deals with macroscopic physics and only explains one of the fundamental forces. The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein. It so happens that a singularity is in the realms of quantum physics and not relativity. I don't think you're in the position to challenge the big bang model if you make such fundamental errors.
@mcmadbat3 "The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein." Did I say it support it? Does Einstein have nothing to do with the big bang? "If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances in the universe have shrunk to zero. An initial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe. We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity. conti ~
Why does everybody that believes in evolution is a complete retard?
Lovedesructo69 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
For this reason most cosmologists think of the initial singularity as the beginning of the universe. On this view the big bang represents the creation event; the creation not only of all the matter and energy in the universe, but also of spacetime itself." ~ P. C. W. Davies.
Are you saying, the universe is eternal in by means of singularity?
spiritring 4 months ago
@spiritring Paul Davies? cool I read his books as a teenager. He just described that we cant predict beyond the big bang. The singularity may have been eternal, or the density may not go all the way to a singularity before spawning of some hyperspace multiverse, like a bubble inflating off a foam of universes, or an ocean of spacetime. there are many other options, we just don't know how to test them yet.
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke (or, perhaps the singularity isn't eternal but popped out of nothingness by some process like energy-time heisenberg uncertainty principle)
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
@HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke or an ocean of spacetime - big bang though is tested and you know vacuum fluctuations cannot occur when space itself was not present. It is no explosion at all on a pre - existing space RATHER the expansion of space itself. The other options are string models which are the ones done in paper and in/math, but does not necessarlly happen in reality.
spiritring 3 months ago
Comment removed
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spiritring well ya, all speculations of what happened before the big bang are just that, speculations. All that is confirmed is that it was veeeery dense about 13.72 billions years ago
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 3 months ago
Comment removed
spiritring 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
singularity is not one but infinity
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
Comment removed
spiritring 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spiritring 1)where did i say small space at state of eternal non expansion? 2)Einstein's space time theorems all would zero time and space? please revisit this sentence and make it make sense. 3)The universe does not always follow the rules of einstein's relativity as you should know.
mcmadbat3 4 months ago
Comment removed
spiritring 4 months ago
@spiritring Again relativity only deals with macroscopic physics and only explains one of the fundamental forces. The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein. It so happens that a singularity is in the realms of quantum physics and not relativity. I don't think you're in the position to challenge the big bang model if you make such fundamental errors.
mcmadbat3 4 months ago
@mcmadbat3 "The other 3 forces are explained by the standard model and not by einstein." Did I say it support it? Does Einstein have nothing to do with the big bang? "If we extrapolate this prediction to its extreme, we reach a point when all distances in the universe have shrunk to zero. An initial cosmological singularity therefore forms a past temporal extremity to the universe. We cannot continue physical reasoning, or even the concept of spacetime, through such an extremity. conti ~
spiritring 4 months ago
fail argument man
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
wow fail
mcmadbat3 1 year ago
facepalm...
ronnystoehr 1 year ago