Well racism is not just done by whites; all peoples do it - including balcks and hispanics, as you saw. That doesn't mean the majority of them share those ideas against you. Those people who don't respect you did a bad thing, and they shouldn't target anyone - ehite or black etc.
LA is segregated. The projects r all black & all hispanic. Very few whites except in the white areas. It led to ur getting hit. How is segregation good? Seems it caused u problems.
The Germans also wanted to preserve "Aryan" culture when they expelled the Jews & had a Holocaust. Ur talk of a "white" nation (presumably under a "Christian" banner) is so repugnant only slave owners like Jefferson would agree with it.
Go on & on about how blacks, Hispanics destroy society (rubbish u invented) & ignore the real crimes: wholesale violence & arrest of blacks & hispanics today. Where did you go to school? Do u really believe the stuff u say? So extrmeme
Look, I've seen lots of racism. Personally I don't care if you hate blacks, Muslims & foreginers - that's ur right. But to say you're not racist & openly call for segregation is a clear contradiction. You talk about hate & genocide. You can't admit that "whites" did that to many non-whites & have reversed it! Now it's genocide of whites?? Nonsense.
The one who hates the US for what it is is you. The KKK & slavery days r over. Please weep. Segregation? Try being black.
Yeah, that's millions of people you guys killed for your own colonial ambitions. THese people never did a thing to whites. You guys hanged thousands of blacks all across the south in the 20th century. How many whites did blacks hang? 0. How many white slaves did they have? 0 How many times did Africa invade the US? 0.
u ignore the past because it cintradicts ur nazi type assertions. Ur a white supremacist. But ur "in the closet". Admit what u r. & your English grammar is poor.
You discuss races like a person with no understanding of DNA. There is no distinction among races. You're black, Indian & Arab & mixed with them all like everyone.
"White filght" will continue? That's a main reason for ghettos - removal of tax dollars for community development. Can't blame "others" for that. U pretend "they" will destroy u. Uh, you're destroying them & have been for years. Genocide, slavery, invading & bombing other countries. Iraq? Afghanistan? Korea? Vietnam?
We're not goinh to "conform" to your dictoship like rules of "speak English" in public. 1st Amendment says "free speech". Multiculturalism is good. Whites didn't invent half the stuff you claimed: light bulb filament, gas mask - blacks. Telepone - an immigrant. Who headed NASA? A nazi war criminal Von Braun. Without immigrants, ur society wouldn't be. YOU R immigrants. You're not indigenous to the land.
No I don't care that "white" culture is on the decine. "White" isn't real
Maybe u would change in another country, but 99% of Americans abroad do not. "poverty and crime" didn't cause ghettos to become bad. Segregating people along racial lines, preventing economic development & encouraging people to havebroken families is wht hte govt & businesses did. FHA (Fed Housing Authority) for example.
Immigrants? Most don't live in the projects. The poor who commit "crimes" r mostly drugs "crimes" of addiction. The UN calls that a racist laws that target them
"Ghettos" didn't come from blaccks or foreigners. The Federal Housing Administration gave many loans so people could get mortgages aftr WWII. Less than 1% of the billions spent went to non-whites; no help until the 1960's Housing law passed by Johnson. That policy helped create the ghettos.
At any rate, they're not nice places to live & most want out. But no jobs & lack of investment & education opportunities prevents people there from leaving.
Basically no one is trying to change you; people looking for work need jobs. US companies with NAFTA destroyed Mexican farmers. Ur suprised they're here? LOL Most prefer their own country & want jobs there. Ask them. Bieng an immigrant isn't easy.
The ones trying to change people r you. You demand they give up their language, values, customs, beliefs etc '& join "white" culture. Yet u refuse to do that when u go to their countries. That's y u tribute Van Buren & Jackson. Same
You want to "to segregate the US racially"? What? & basically stop immigration. But the jobs went to China, not immigrants. Blame the US corporations & politicians, not Paco.
"Countries within countries"? Not true. Foreigners, blacks & hispances etc have done virtually 0 harm to whites. Tolerance is being aware of & respecting & allowing differences. I won't join ur "white" culture. That's what the Germans were saying in the 1940's. That's an extreme position ur taking.
You want a "monocultural society" whose "White culture is American culture."
"new immigrants ... trying to change what I value." Who did this?
Speak "English in public" because you "can't understand it". Americans speak English when they go abroad. Sounds like hypocrisy & violates Free Speech 1st Amendment (ur values
.
Multicultures will "encourage separation". There never was 1 US all united; and no slaves were majority in several states like Virginia.
Why do u minimise blacks' contributions to ur society? 8% owned slaves? U realise slaves outnumbered whites in most states? There an enormous number of blacks. Ur people had no problem stripping them of their cultual identity, languages, religions during slavery. thousands of blacks hanged even up tp the 1930's! When did blacks ever do that to whites? When did Africans enslave Europe or America?
A white America built by slaves. At least admit it. I can & I'm not black.
So I'm saying you can go backwards to the examples of Jackson & Van Buren - who were white supremacists, owned slaves & participated in Genocide - or you can go forward. Keep the good things things from your society & culture like free speech & freedom of the press. When people say "restore America", they're really asking for an all white America. That's a pretty scary thing. Maybe it's not ur position, but it's nazi like to have just one culture or race. We're all people.
Foreigners comming to the US have a right to preserve their cultural identies just as you do when you go abroad. To tell them "change" is hypocritical. The one asking for cultural genocide is the one saying "assimilation". They can speak their language, keep customs etc. Why should they change? You won't change. A little respect & tolerance goes a long way.
Jackson & Van Buren had no respect & those that "assimilated" were still forced out & killed. Tribute? Yes to the victims
mult-cultural is a reality & it means respect for differences. It doesn't mean stop being who you r. Just as u have the right to ur cultural identity, so do blacks, hispanics & foreigners. If the country turns into majority non-whites, so what. How could that be bad? Historically blacks, N Americans & foreigners did very little harm to white Americans. No reason to fear.
Assimilation? That means lose identity. Would u stop being "white" if u went to Jamaica? y should u?
No one said you can't have your identity & no one proposes to "genocide" white identity. Was the country for whites? Yes. But not founded just by whites. Read any respected historian or economist: slavery was the economy. The cotton, sugar & tobacco was so profitable because they didn't pay labour. NY: Wall St - built by slaves; the White House & Capitol also built by slaves. All the major banks today have their money from slave trade - directly. Multi-cultural means
So I don't have a problem with "white" culture. But certain things one should not celebrate; enjoy the good, but not the crimes. White supremacy was a major component, & that's related to the argument of "mass immigration". Excuse me, but whites were the mass immigration onto "Indian" lands & later into Mexico.
So u have no problems when white do it, but when brown skin people go the US? The Indians were killed for land. U didn't do that, but honour the good things, not the bad.
U can focus on others or your own country. But the US supported the Kmer Rouge at certain points & did nothing to prevent the problems there. The numbers there don't even compare with the US mass bombings of Cambodia under Nixon.
At the same time of Pol Pot, the US helped Indonesia commit a larger Genocide in E Timor: aid & weapons. Check John Pilger's film "Year Zero". Don't believe me, but it won an Emmy. Oh, I'm not black. But they built the W house! & the wealth? Slaves
Ur "Liar, liar" argument of caling me a racist won't work. Typical line from you racists is that salvery was common all over, so US didn't do anything bad or different. Now you added genocide to that. Wow. At least that's a new one.
No one said you were personally involved in those crimes, but ur proud of them. You can't discuss US history without genocide & slavery. Ur right, that's its foundation.
Sadly conquering people continues. Iraq, Afghanistan etc. proud of that?
"If there was no genocide there would be no America."
Then you just said it was ok to murder millions of "Indians" to have your country. Germans would be saying "There'd be no Germany if there was no Genocide" [of the Jews]. That's extreme, and you're "proud" of it.
My ancestors weren't slaves. But I reject the racist rubbish & support for Genocide by people like you. It was wrong then & people said it THEN. Try David Walker, Henri Grégoire etc. Ur a sick racist
Thank you. I will do just that. And while I'm researching what was done and said by people over 200 years ago I invite you to research what goes on right now under your nose. Favoring one person over another for absolutely no other reason but for the color of their skin. You seem like a rational person so i'm sure you would agree with me this is racism. By the way, this is called AFFIMITIVE ACTION.
Another slave owner who also helped steal land from Native Americans. SO where is the "tribute" to his victims? Eh? Where is the momument to the over 4000 Cherokees who died on The Trail of Tears when Buren was Jackson's VP in 1838?
Where is the monument to the slaves stolen from Africa & forced at gun point to make a profit for these lazy men who never did honest work a day in their lives? Those are your values: slavery of Africans & Genocide of Native Americans. Do you honour them?
@EBanonymous You need to get your facts straight. Who was a founding member of the Free Soil Party, an anti-slavery party? When Abraham Lincoln, the president known for ending slavery, was a lawyer in Illinois and rejected by everyone, who was the one person who saw that he could do wonders and helped him? When he was dying, whose family lied to him about the North winning the Civil War so he could die pleased? The answer to all these questions is Martin Van Buren.
1) Slaves WERE stolen from Africa. A person cannot be part of a contract unless he agrees to it. Or maybe I should sell you and it would be legal?
Africans didn't own slaves the way you say; they had indentured servants, and only started trading people to whites because they were arming their enemies & dividing tribes.
2) Native Americans is the same - and nothing like European slavery
3) There are 100 IF EVEN documented cases of blacks w/ slaves in US
A contract is legally binding if it is freely made between 2 consentual partners; they muct be familiar w/ it & understand its implications & their responsibilities.
Clause 4 does not ask individual people to assume "public debt"; the govt itself have that responsibilty, and used taxes to pay for Civil War debt; it didn't have to pay for ex-slaves or Confederate debt.
Tyler? Another slave driver. Ur radicals...
That's not even through income tax; it didn't exist in 1866
Sad as it is...every sitting President (til the 13th amendment) can be attached to "supporting" slavery...but, not every sitting President during this time period can be attached to domestic/foreign policy as Tyler...even Van Buren.
Yes, the Trail of Tears was horrid...none of our Presidents have been great; but those who have been somewhat good are far and few between, this is my only justification for Van Burnen / Tyler.
Unilateral contracts exist based on the unkowing consent of one of the parties; me and you (if you are a 14th Amendment citizen)...using the Federal Reserve notes, having a Social Security number, voter registration, draft registration ,etc...all consent in the eyes of the United States.
You are now, via the 14th, a "United States" citizen...prior...there were only Citizens of the States.
1) Van Buren was a huge supporter - just like Jackson - of slavery. Neither he nor Lincoln opposed slavery.
2) Van Buren - the man whose feet you kiss - was no supporter of blacks or native Americans. In fact, id he had been, Jackson never would have chosen him.
The Democratic Party was founded by white supremacists as extreme as any nazi ever was - That includes the Van Buren who allowed blacks to be whipped, raped & killed.
@EBanonymous Ok: Ron828282: Of course slaves were stolen from Africa. What was done to them was awful and inhumane. But EBanonymous: Of course Lincoln opposed slavery. He started the war that ended slavery. And if not for MVB, Lincoln would have never been president. And Martin Van Buren did not support slavery either he helped found the free soil party a party whose central ideology was anti-slavery.
Van Buren was a huge supporter of slavery;because of free soil? Do you know what western expansion was? Opposing a slave state is not opposing slavery
That's what Lincoln did. He was never an abolitionist; abolitionists denounced him.Read his 1st Inaugural Address. He also supported an amendemnt to keep slavery permament (the original 13th).
Lincoln was a huge racist - as in sending all blacks to S America or back to Africa & compensating slave owners - those were his plans.
@EBanonymous I don't really care if Lincoln was a racist. He still ended slavery. And without Martin Van Buren, that wouldn't have happened. The point is that no matter what you say, Martin Van Buren was still the coolest president ever. WORSHIP HIM
@jacklestein "Worhip him"? No, you can have that 'honour'. Your criteria for cool is:
1) be a slave owner
2) support slavery
3) be a white supremacist & follow Jackson
Maybe Van Buren helped Lincoln, but Buren had nothing to do w/ abolitionism. Not even Lincoln did. Only in 1863 when he had no chioce did he do anything, and that was after supporting an amendment to keep slavery forever; the Republican Party were desperate & so was Lincoln.
What 's that got to do w/ Van Buren? Ur dilusional
Lincoln didnt end Slavery...Lincoln murdered 600,000 people, was a dictator, nationalized the press and railroads, improsined those who spoke out against him, gave people no reason for imprisonment nor a right to counsel, issued arrest warrants for supreme court justices, confiscated firearms from southern state citizens, blocked southern ports (act of war), established a federal police force...where do i end?
I dont think Van Buren was a "huge" supporter of Slavery...i will have to research it more; but i think it was one of those mood points to him that he disregarded; not to say that something shouldnt have been done.
I do recall that he had a family slave which ran away...but after he ran away, i have no recollection of him owning or "supporting" slavery...please let me know if you have any info otherwise; im always open to learn more.
Go ahead "prove me wrong". Van Buren a racist slave owner who held blacks in chians & supported the rape, torture & killing of blacks on a daily basis; the man who supported Jackson's ethnic cleansing of the indigenous peoples of the continent.
Public schools? Try reading Van buren's own letters & writings. Scholtz? I don't read his work. Really, now. Maybe if you were on a reservation ur POV would be a little less skewed.
When governor Lilburn Boggs of Missouri issued an order in 1838 that "the Mormons must be driven from the state, or exterminated," Van Buren refused to intervene. He said if he did he would lose the vote of the state of Missouri. About 5000 settlers were driven from their homes in the dead of winter, leaving a trail of blood from Jackson county to Illinois. Nothing else about this president is as worthy of remembering.
Most important in the video, it shows one idea or two on how the expression "OK" gained such immense popularity during the Presidency of Martin Van Buren even if he did not originate it himself.
Too bad Van Buren's administration was on the wrong side of history in its attempt to hand over the Amistad Africans to the Spaniards. Too bad he got beat down in the Supreme Court by the Amistad defendants' council, the far, far more noteworthy ex-president John Quincy Adams.
As Van Buren lives on thru McCain (clever joke), Karl Marx is rising from the grave to haunt the world again thru Barack Obama-rama, 44th President and first god-king of the U.S.A.
The town of Van Buren, Maine, is named after our 8th President. Look it up. No, not Google. In a book. You 20-somethings have heard of books, yes? They're printed. With words. Sentences and paragraphs. Some have pictures!
It's actually an "L" not an "I." You are lucky to be related to somebody so famous. But if that relative happens to be the person who beat my hero Martin Van Buren in the presidential race, then it's on.
my favorite president. During the panic of 1837 he did nothing, which resulted in the fastest economic revovery from recession we have ever had. A true man of laissez fair. However, I disagree with McCaine-Buren correlation. McCaine had no respect for the constitution and would be hated by Van Burn. A man to compare to Van Burn is Ron Paul.
during the Panic he did something...he called a sepcial session of Congress a issued a statement to Congress to handle the recession with Government retrenchment; Van Buren knew the cause of the recession and asked that Congress cut government, taxes and spending but...more importantly cut off the revenue sharing to the States (which Jackson implemented)
Also...he helped institute an independent government treasury, Jackson held the government funds in State banks - essentially a loan from the federal government for the States...anyways, he (through Congress) also made it so only Gold and Silver were legal tender...the independent treasury meant a complete deregulation of the financial system (on a National/Federal Level)...good for the citizens; see todays monetary system for comparison.
I think we need to have Lincoln's monument to totalitarian, welfare/warfare state torn down and one to MVB put in its place. This man was probably the most honest statesman ever to occupy the White House and he worked incessantly to keep us out of war, what every president is supposed to do.
Van Buren was President in 1838 not Vice President. Dumbass.
owenbrough 11 months ago
@owenbrough I know and it never says that in the video ya dumbass
jacklestein 9 months ago
THE LITTLE MAGICIAN THE LITTLE MAGICIAN.
I will tell you what is magic:
NOT MY WORTHLESS PEN OR SOME SKANK-HOE TELLER!!!
..ta..
..da..VOTE FOR THE PATHFINDER!
parafleet 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Well racism is not just done by whites; all peoples do it - including balcks and hispanics, as you saw. That doesn't mean the majority of them share those ideas against you. Those people who don't respect you did a bad thing, and they shouldn't target anyone - ehite or black etc.
LA is segregated. The projects r all black & all hispanic. Very few whites except in the white areas. It led to ur getting hit. How is segregation good? Seems it caused u problems.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
The Germans also wanted to preserve "Aryan" culture when they expelled the Jews & had a Holocaust. Ur talk of a "white" nation (presumably under a "Christian" banner) is so repugnant only slave owners like Jefferson would agree with it.
Go on & on about how blacks, Hispanics destroy society (rubbish u invented) & ignore the real crimes: wholesale violence & arrest of blacks & hispanics today. Where did you go to school? Do u really believe the stuff u say? So extrmeme
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Look, I've seen lots of racism. Personally I don't care if you hate blacks, Muslims & foreginers - that's ur right. But to say you're not racist & openly call for segregation is a clear contradiction. You talk about hate & genocide. You can't admit that "whites" did that to many non-whites & have reversed it! Now it's genocide of whites?? Nonsense.
The one who hates the US for what it is is you. The KKK & slavery days r over. Please weep. Segregation? Try being black.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
No I do not have "bitterness" against "whites". My skin IS white! I'm not black. & I never said you're responsible for things other people did.
"segregation hurts no one". Who told you that? "distinction between races"? According to what genecitists? Name some recent studies. Please.
"Allah"? I'm not even Muslim.
Please look up the definition of "genocide".
As to "learning English", most foreigners do that. But you make simple grammar errors. "They're" vs "Their"
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Yeah, that's millions of people you guys killed for your own colonial ambitions. THese people never did a thing to whites. You guys hanged thousands of blacks all across the south in the 20th century. How many whites did blacks hang? 0. How many white slaves did they have? 0 How many times did Africa invade the US? 0.
u ignore the past because it cintradicts ur nazi type assertions. Ur a white supremacist. But ur "in the closet". Admit what u r. & your English grammar is poor.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
You discuss races like a person with no understanding of DNA. There is no distinction among races. You're black, Indian & Arab & mixed with them all like everyone.
"White filght" will continue? That's a main reason for ghettos - removal of tax dollars for community development. Can't blame "others" for that. U pretend "they" will destroy u. Uh, you're destroying them & have been for years. Genocide, slavery, invading & bombing other countries. Iraq? Afghanistan? Korea? Vietnam?
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
We're not goinh to "conform" to your dictoship like rules of "speak English" in public. 1st Amendment says "free speech". Multiculturalism is good. Whites didn't invent half the stuff you claimed: light bulb filament, gas mask - blacks. Telepone - an immigrant. Who headed NASA? A nazi war criminal Von Braun. Without immigrants, ur society wouldn't be. YOU R immigrants. You're not indigenous to the land.
No I don't care that "white" culture is on the decine. "White" isn't real
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Maybe u would change in another country, but 99% of Americans abroad do not. "poverty and crime" didn't cause ghettos to become bad. Segregating people along racial lines, preventing economic development & encouraging people to havebroken families is wht hte govt & businesses did. FHA (Fed Housing Authority) for example.
Immigrants? Most don't live in the projects. The poor who commit "crimes" r mostly drugs "crimes" of addiction. The UN calls that a racist laws that target them
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
"Ghettos" didn't come from blaccks or foreigners. The Federal Housing Administration gave many loans so people could get mortgages aftr WWII. Less than 1% of the billions spent went to non-whites; no help until the 1960's Housing law passed by Johnson. That policy helped create the ghettos.
At any rate, they're not nice places to live & most want out. But no jobs & lack of investment & education opportunities prevents people there from leaving.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Basically no one is trying to change you; people looking for work need jobs. US companies with NAFTA destroyed Mexican farmers. Ur suprised they're here? LOL Most prefer their own country & want jobs there. Ask them. Bieng an immigrant isn't easy.
The ones trying to change people r you. You demand they give up their language, values, customs, beliefs etc '& join "white" culture. Yet u refuse to do that when u go to their countries. That's y u tribute Van Buren & Jackson. Same
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
You want to "to segregate the US racially"? What? & basically stop immigration. But the jobs went to China, not immigrants. Blame the US corporations & politicians, not Paco.
"Countries within countries"? Not true. Foreigners, blacks & hispances etc have done virtually 0 harm to whites. Tolerance is being aware of & respecting & allowing differences. I won't join ur "white" culture. That's what the Germans were saying in the 1940's. That's an extreme position ur taking.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
You want a "monocultural society" whose "White culture is American culture."
"new immigrants ... trying to change what I value." Who did this?
Speak "English in public" because you "can't understand it". Americans speak English when they go abroad. Sounds like hypocrisy & violates Free Speech 1st Amendment (ur values
.
Multicultures will "encourage separation". There never was 1 US all united; and no slaves were majority in several states like Virginia.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Why do u minimise blacks' contributions to ur society? 8% owned slaves? U realise slaves outnumbered whites in most states? There an enormous number of blacks. Ur people had no problem stripping them of their cultual identity, languages, religions during slavery. thousands of blacks hanged even up tp the 1930's! When did blacks ever do that to whites? When did Africans enslave Europe or America?
A white America built by slaves. At least admit it. I can & I'm not black.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
So I'm saying you can go backwards to the examples of Jackson & Van Buren - who were white supremacists, owned slaves & participated in Genocide - or you can go forward. Keep the good things things from your society & culture like free speech & freedom of the press. When people say "restore America", they're really asking for an all white America. That's a pretty scary thing. Maybe it's not ur position, but it's nazi like to have just one culture or race. We're all people.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Foreigners comming to the US have a right to preserve their cultural identies just as you do when you go abroad. To tell them "change" is hypocritical. The one asking for cultural genocide is the one saying "assimilation". They can speak their language, keep customs etc. Why should they change? You won't change. A little respect & tolerance goes a long way.
Jackson & Van Buren had no respect & those that "assimilated" were still forced out & killed. Tribute? Yes to the victims
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
mult-cultural is a reality & it means respect for differences. It doesn't mean stop being who you r. Just as u have the right to ur cultural identity, so do blacks, hispanics & foreigners. If the country turns into majority non-whites, so what. How could that be bad? Historically blacks, N Americans & foreigners did very little harm to white Americans. No reason to fear.
Assimilation? That means lose identity. Would u stop being "white" if u went to Jamaica? y should u?
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
No one said you can't have your identity & no one proposes to "genocide" white identity. Was the country for whites? Yes. But not founded just by whites. Read any respected historian or economist: slavery was the economy. The cotton, sugar & tobacco was so profitable because they didn't pay labour. NY: Wall St - built by slaves; the White House & Capitol also built by slaves. All the major banks today have their money from slave trade - directly. Multi-cultural means
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
So I don't have a problem with "white" culture. But certain things one should not celebrate; enjoy the good, but not the crimes. White supremacy was a major component, & that's related to the argument of "mass immigration". Excuse me, but whites were the mass immigration onto "Indian" lands & later into Mexico.
So u have no problems when white do it, but when brown skin people go the US? The Indians were killed for land. U didn't do that, but honour the good things, not the bad.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
U can focus on others or your own country. But the US supported the Kmer Rouge at certain points & did nothing to prevent the problems there. The numbers there don't even compare with the US mass bombings of Cambodia under Nixon.
At the same time of Pol Pot, the US helped Indonesia commit a larger Genocide in E Timor: aid & weapons. Check John Pilger's film "Year Zero". Don't believe me, but it won an Emmy. Oh, I'm not black. But they built the W house! & the wealth? Slaves
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
Ur "Liar, liar" argument of caling me a racist won't work. Typical line from you racists is that salvery was common all over, so US didn't do anything bad or different. Now you added genocide to that. Wow. At least that's a new one.
No one said you were personally involved in those crimes, but ur proud of them. You can't discuss US history without genocide & slavery. Ur right, that's its foundation.
Sadly conquering people continues. Iraq, Afghanistan etc. proud of that?
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@BSANONYMOUS
"If there was no genocide there would be no America."
Then you just said it was ok to murder millions of "Indians" to have your country. Germans would be saying "There'd be no Germany if there was no Genocide" [of the Jews]. That's extreme, and you're "proud" of it.
My ancestors weren't slaves. But I reject the racist rubbish & support for Genocide by people like you. It was wrong then & people said it THEN. Try David Walker, Henri Grégoire etc. Ur a sick racist
EBanonymous 1 year ago
Thank you. I will do just that. And while I'm researching what was done and said by people over 200 years ago I invite you to research what goes on right now under your nose. Favoring one person over another for absolutely no other reason but for the color of their skin. You seem like a rational person so i'm sure you would agree with me this is racism. By the way, this is called AFFIMITIVE ACTION.
NDulge1 1 year ago
Martin ouwe pik! Je hebt geweldig werkt verricht!
daid1900 1 year ago
The great great great great grandfather of Armin van Buuren. !!!
SaysWh0 1 year ago
Ya punk suckas, ya pussy muthafuckas
afraid of president number 8, cuz he's bringin the ruckus!
Don't touch this if ya only fear is death,
Cuz the Van Buren Boys'll rub you out just to gain some fuckin rep!
SLAYERCOBHC93 1 year ago
dam this dude had style and what a kick ass name .
SHEPARDWISPERER 1 year ago
VAN BUREB BOYZ! we dont fuck around
SLAYERCOBHC93 1 year ago
@jacklestein
EBanonymous 1 year ago
Another slave owner who also helped steal land from Native Americans. SO where is the "tribute" to his victims? Eh? Where is the momument to the over 4000 Cherokees who died on The Trail of Tears when Buren was Jackson's VP in 1838?
Where is the monument to the slaves stolen from Africa & forced at gun point to make a profit for these lazy men who never did honest work a day in their lives? Those are your values: slavery of Africans & Genocide of Native Americans. Do you honour them?
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous You need to get your facts straight. Who was a founding member of the Free Soil Party, an anti-slavery party? When Abraham Lincoln, the president known for ending slavery, was a lawyer in Illinois and rejected by everyone, who was the one person who saw that he could do wonders and helped him? When he was dying, whose family lied to him about the North winning the Civil War so he could die pleased? The answer to all these questions is Martin Van Buren.
jacklestein 1 year ago
@jacklestein
Can u clarify ur statement? Ur saying Van Buren was against slavery or Lincoln? Neither was.
I spoke about crimes to NA tribes, of which Van Buren is guilty & as to Crimes Against Humanity, Van Buren didn't do anything to end slavery.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@jacklestein
Also:
1: Slaves werent stolen from Africa. They were bought from Africa from Africians. Who also owned slaves.
2. Native Americans owned slaves.
3. Africian Americans living in America owned slaves
Ron828282 1 year ago
@
1) Slaves WERE stolen from Africa. A person cannot be part of a contract unless he agrees to it. Or maybe I should sell you and it would be legal?
Africans didn't own slaves the way you say; they had indentured servants, and only started trading people to whites because they were arming their enemies & dividing tribes.
2) Native Americans is the same - and nothing like European slavery
3) There are 100 IF EVEN documented cases of blacks w/ slaves in US
So this justifies it? what crap!
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous
Read the 14th Amendment...you ARE unilaterally part of a Contract with the United States (corp) and YOU are held responsible for its debts....
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@helltrackrider
A contract is legally binding if it is freely made between 2 consentual partners; they muct be familiar w/ it & understand its implications & their responsibilities.
Clause 4 does not ask individual people to assume "public debt"; the govt itself have that responsibilty, and used taxes to pay for Civil War debt; it didn't have to pay for ex-slaves or Confederate debt.
Tyler? Another slave driver. Ur radicals...
That's not even through income tax; it didn't exist in 1866
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous
Sad as it is...every sitting President (til the 13th amendment) can be attached to "supporting" slavery...but, not every sitting President during this time period can be attached to domestic/foreign policy as Tyler...even Van Buren.
Yes, the Trail of Tears was horrid...none of our Presidents have been great; but those who have been somewhat good are far and few between, this is my only justification for Van Burnen / Tyler.
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@EBanonymous
Unilateral contracts exist based on the unkowing consent of one of the parties; me and you (if you are a 14th Amendment citizen)...using the Federal Reserve notes, having a Social Security number, voter registration, draft registration ,etc...all consent in the eyes of the United States.
You are now, via the 14th, a "United States" citizen...prior...there were only Citizens of the States.
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@jacklestein
1) Van Buren was a huge supporter - just like Jackson - of slavery. Neither he nor Lincoln opposed slavery.
2) Van Buren - the man whose feet you kiss - was no supporter of blacks or native Americans. In fact, id he had been, Jackson never would have chosen him.
The Democratic Party was founded by white supremacists as extreme as any nazi ever was - That includes the Van Buren who allowed blacks to be whipped, raped & killed.
He didn't do a DAMN thing to help those people.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous Ok: Ron828282: Of course slaves were stolen from Africa. What was done to them was awful and inhumane. But EBanonymous: Of course Lincoln opposed slavery. He started the war that ended slavery. And if not for MVB, Lincoln would have never been president. And Martin Van Buren did not support slavery either he helped found the free soil party a party whose central ideology was anti-slavery.
jacklestein 1 year ago
@jacklestein
Van Buren was a huge supporter of slavery;because of free soil? Do you know what western expansion was? Opposing a slave state is not opposing slavery
That's what Lincoln did. He was never an abolitionist; abolitionists denounced him.Read his 1st Inaugural Address. He also supported an amendemnt to keep slavery permament (the original 13th).
Lincoln was a huge racist - as in sending all blacks to S America or back to Africa & compensating slave owners - those were his plans.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous I don't really care if Lincoln was a racist. He still ended slavery. And without Martin Van Buren, that wouldn't have happened. The point is that no matter what you say, Martin Van Buren was still the coolest president ever. WORSHIP HIM
jacklestein 1 year ago
@jacklestein "Worhip him"? No, you can have that 'honour'. Your criteria for cool is:
1) be a slave owner
2) support slavery
3) be a white supremacist & follow Jackson
Maybe Van Buren helped Lincoln, but Buren had nothing to do w/ abolitionism. Not even Lincoln did. Only in 1863 when he had no chioce did he do anything, and that was after supporting an amendment to keep slavery forever; the Republican Party were desperate & so was Lincoln.
What 's that got to do w/ Van Buren? Ur dilusional
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@jacklestein
Lincoln didnt end Slavery...Lincoln murdered 600,000 people, was a dictator, nationalized the press and railroads, improsined those who spoke out against him, gave people no reason for imprisonment nor a right to counsel, issued arrest warrants for supreme court justices, confiscated firearms from southern state citizens, blocked southern ports (act of war), established a federal police force...where do i end?
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@jacklestein
agree...Van Buren, Tyler too, are the coolest Presidents ever...
Ron Paul 2012
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@EBanonymous
I dont think Van Buren was a "huge" supporter of Slavery...i will have to research it more; but i think it was one of those mood points to him that he disregarded; not to say that something shouldnt have been done.
I do recall that he had a family slave which ran away...but after he ran away, i have no recollection of him owning or "supporting" slavery...please let me know if you have any info otherwise; im always open to learn more.
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@EBanonymous Where do you get these facts from? Ed Scholtz? Public schools? I'll prove you wrong .
NDulge1 1 year ago
@NDulge1
Go ahead "prove me wrong". Van Buren a racist slave owner who held blacks in chians & supported the rape, torture & killing of blacks on a daily basis; the man who supported Jackson's ethnic cleansing of the indigenous peoples of the continent.
Public schools? Try reading Van buren's own letters & writings. Scholtz? I don't read his work. Really, now. Maybe if you were on a reservation ur POV would be a little less skewed.
EBanonymous 1 year ago
@EBanonymous great comment and true
xbox7203 1 year ago
When governor Lilburn Boggs of Missouri issued an order in 1838 that "the Mormons must be driven from the state, or exterminated," Van Buren refused to intervene. He said if he did he would lose the vote of the state of Missouri. About 5000 settlers were driven from their homes in the dead of winter, leaving a trail of blood from Jackson county to Illinois. Nothing else about this president is as worthy of remembering.
SamDayWeddingPainter 2 years ago
Most important in the video, it shows one idea or two on how the expression "OK" gained such immense popularity during the Presidency of Martin Van Buren even if he did not originate it himself.
ALANRLEAKE 2 years ago
william henry harrison didnt have a stupid looking haircut
sandythebear 2 years ago
I heard he had a nasty temper!
DH2020 2 years ago
@DH2020 He didn't. He was actually very shy.
jacklestein 1 year ago
What's up with the german soundtrack?
indivum 2 years ago
Too bad Van Buren's administration was on the wrong side of history in its attempt to hand over the Amistad Africans to the Spaniards. Too bad he got beat down in the Supreme Court by the Amistad defendants' council, the far, far more noteworthy ex-president John Quincy Adams.
hatchbx 3 years ago
Well done.
As Van Buren lives on thru McCain (clever joke), Karl Marx is rising from the grave to haunt the world again thru Barack Obama-rama, 44th President and first god-king of the U.S.A.
The town of Van Buren, Maine, is named after our 8th President. Look it up. No, not Google. In a book. You 20-somethings have heard of books, yes? They're printed. With words. Sentences and paragraphs. Some have pictures!
OK. Google "book." Report due on Monday.
Waldocounty 3 years ago
amazing.....
bogmire777 3 years ago
has anyone noticed the resemblance between Van Buren and arthur schopenhauer? very impressive sidewhiskers!
diamond012345678 3 years ago
thanks for this vid, I'm doing a report on van buren-very helpful
kayandmady12 3 years ago
can someone tell me the name of the song?
boricuazenho 3 years ago
Rette Mich, by Tokio Hotel. It's in German
jacklestein 3 years ago
thanxs so much dude this song is awesome
boricuazenho 3 years ago
His spirit lives on thru mccain? if you say so. all harrison did was beat a bunch of indians in some irrelevant battle. thats how he won.
thecoffeecake 3 years ago
nirvana
sdvrox 3 years ago
this video sparked the dreams of van burenites cross the globe
bogmire777 3 years ago
William Henery Harrison died in a month!! the curse of Van Buren!
bogmire777 3 years ago
William Henry Harrison was my great great great great grandfather. Talk smack and we be throwin down, Jackie
lonelyboylv 3 years ago
It's actually an "L" not an "I." You are lucky to be related to somebody so famous. But if that relative happens to be the person who beat my hero Martin Van Buren in the presidential race, then it's on.
jacklestein 3 years ago
what i dont know what u mean!!!
mega1140 3 years ago
i like this!! We found out that he is our relative and it is awesome!!
sugarbear1020 3 years ago
I worship you. I have sent a friend request.
jacklestein 3 years ago
Its a strong effort, but I really needed to see the part where he single-handedly fought an army of drug dealers and deviants of some sort.
terminalpictures 3 years ago
Ur kinda cute
CloseTheClub 3 years ago
Van Buren was very politically experienced and witty, but sadly didn't have much sucess as a president.
hauntedmythcaves 3 years ago
The Van B Boyz
rxsecretplot 3 years ago
What book of the bible is this from?
WiggyStein 4 years ago
kinderhookians.
jacklestein 4 years ago
Great video, but you forgot the part where he time traveled.
ZacPensol 4 years ago
my favorite president. During the panic of 1837 he did nothing, which resulted in the fastest economic revovery from recession we have ever had. A true man of laissez fair. However, I disagree with McCaine-Buren correlation. McCaine had no respect for the constitution and would be hated by Van Burn. A man to compare to Van Burn is Ron Paul.
solarpanel420 4 years ago 6
Yes I can see that Ron Paul is more related to MVB and I don't disagree with you. But yes MVB was the best president.
jacklestein 4 years ago
for sure*
solarpanel420 4 years ago 2
@solarpanel420
during the Panic he did something...he called a sepcial session of Congress a issued a statement to Congress to handle the recession with Government retrenchment; Van Buren knew the cause of the recession and asked that Congress cut government, taxes and spending but...more importantly cut off the revenue sharing to the States (which Jackson implemented)
helltrackrider 1 year ago
@solarpanel420
Also...he helped institute an independent government treasury, Jackson held the government funds in State banks - essentially a loan from the federal government for the States...anyways, he (through Congress) also made it so only Gold and Silver were legal tender...the independent treasury meant a complete deregulation of the financial system (on a National/Federal Level)...good for the citizens; see todays monetary system for comparison.
helltrackrider 1 year ago
Probably the greatest of all American presidents. I'm serious. Probably the strictest constitutionalist we've ever had in the executive seat.
Revere1776 4 years ago 3
Thank you! I have never agreed with anyone more than you!
jacklestein 4 years ago
I think we need to have Lincoln's monument to totalitarian, welfare/warfare state torn down and one to MVB put in its place. This man was probably the most honest statesman ever to occupy the White House and he worked incessantly to keep us out of war, what every president is supposed to do.
Revere1776 4 years ago 4
TOKIO HOTEL!
elegantgazelle 4 years ago