listen you self appointed human hating wimwam! hahhaah. no one is asking you to find us a way into the future. listen to that rothschild minion audition for kissingers position when he croaks. hahahhaha
On 8:11 onwards: We will soon have not just physical economics but also social chemistry. I’m sorry but some of the audience participation is just woefully poor. Democracy, I'm afraid, does not apply to everything. There is such a thing as expert knowledge and not all opinions are worth expending time on. A good example is the crackpot claim that the green movement was founded by eugenicists and "will destroy Africa". Climate change is not the only indication that all is not well!
@topographicoceans11 So I'm the conspiracy nut for believing that the Earth WON'T turn into some kind of barren wasteland which would barely support life. I'm sorry but saying we're responsible for the warming of our planet (which by the way I'm still waiting for since we've had several very cold winters and non existant summers here in England recently) is ridiculous. If you think CO2 is responsible then your ignoring 70% of what our planet's surface is made of. Water is the greenhouse king
I realised something. I never was a big wrestling fan but it always bothered me why a company (WWF) doing "good" in the world couldn't just change its name and let WWE keep their old one but it's all about reputation isn't it. They built up WWF to seem all good and then drop AGW on us and get WWF to support it so everyones like "I'm listening to them cos they like panda's and panda's are cute"
On a related note Hulk Hogan once said "NWO is the only way to go". Maybe WWE are in on it too? lol
Jesus christ I thought I found a reasonable televised debate but nearly every good (and by good I mean blatant truth) question was ignored or laughed at.
Makes me fucking sick. I bet people in the audience were paid off to support AGW or am I giving man kind too much credit?
Are we really this asleep or is laughing when Hitler's mentioned a reaction to being in denial from us being in a much worst Hitler esque situation?
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Disgraceful how the audience members questions are being ignored. Now watching this segment makes me think the whole damn show is rigged. It has taught us nothing. Typical of TV debate shows. Its all pantomime.
@CotardDelusion Yes, pure manipulation of perceptions. You'll notice how this debate was just arranged to destroy 'skeptics' and people who actually say something of relevance (like those folks in the audience). This is not a debate, it's a whitewash, in the name of the idiot pseudoscience that is AGW.
Reality has a stability, a negative feedback, that if a little more CO2 appears - the transfer that happens any way keeps happening
When the sun warms - the earth radiates a little more (+4 watts/m2) for each degree Celsius - the IPCC models falsely predicts that as the earth warms it will radiate -3watts/m2 less per degree rise, so the models are 7watts wrong per square meter
Could somebody clarify the criticsm given relating to Kepels work on statistics, I think that was the best point made in the debate, by anyone, because the problem with the climate movement is an underlying logical falsehood in not understanding what it really is that constitutes evidence,
don't you love journalism? the dude in the beanie and glasses makes an excellent point about observational methods and their possible falsehood, the moderator is too stupid to see its import and goes to another person. might as well have barking seals on the panel and as a moderator. laughing in the audience really shows the bias of most of those present. it is a shame society is so polarized and have no minds of their own. put a paper bag over our heads and we'll all die from starvation!
The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project
Have you come up with a better solution. because what going on now is a recipe for disaster. Tell me what about genetics what happens when the elite tap into that power source. Am all in favor of people becoming super human but in the hands of a sick, spiritually poor, callus, self serving culture. I think not. note these are negative aspects mentioned.
The Venus Project is not a solution, it is a goal.
It's like saying the problem with the world today is that there are people starving, so lets just have people be fed by magic!
This global warming blabal i so exaggerated.
You have a long way to go if you want to be a super human. You Venus Project morons haven't even managed to postulate a decent response or a plan for you to get there. Complete lunacy...
There is very much a high school mentality throughout the whole debate. They make the people that agree with the science of climate change the 'cool' kids and those that disagree with it the 'weird outcasts'. They didn't take any questions from the audience in this piece of those that questioned global warming and many of the crowd that agree with the science banded together and laughed quite cruely at some very relevant issues like the ones the last man asked which can be accounted for.
It's obvious how this debate is jumping over some very serious issues like the envoromentalists link to population reduction. This debate is obviously rigged big time and just shows how biased those who're running the show actually are. It's typical and tiresome.
"These same methane clathrates are present today in the Arctic permafrost as well as below sea level, and remain dormant until triggered by warming.
"This is a major concern because it's possible that only a little warming can unleash this trapped methane. Unzippering the methane reservoir could warm the Earth TENS OF DEGREES, and the mechanism could be geologically very rapid."
Search : Large Methane Release Could Cause Abrupt Climate Change As Happened 635 Million Years Ago
Net Solar Radiation has NOT INCREASED since 1975. There is excellent satellite data to prove it.
An 11 year solar cycle causes a 0.2C average oscillation every 5.5 years. However, with NO NET increase in solar radiation since 1975, arctic ice and mountain glaciers have lost 50% of their total mass.
Duhh!!!
Not one single Climate Change denier can explain it.
Search:
NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Affect Our Climate System
The kid who challenged Pilger's credibility was definitely a plant. No question! It's a shame our most respected journalist has been censored in his own country.
I've given this series my time. They have had their say to make their case.
Fuck this bullshit. No science. No data. No nothing, except the standard "we're destroying the planet".
Which is typical of British socialists and American Democrats.
I'm not wasting my time listening to your backwoods, hacknyed, hayseed, ignorant, chaw spittin' uneducated, unknowledgable, commie, pinko, socialist, bullshit... anymore.
i have the same opinion... one day i will go to north and south pole, learn how to extract the information from them. She just attributed the entire environmentalist movement on one person, giving no tribute to the hippies... now thats an off ball.
Does anyone sense a conspiracy on Global Warming, especially when NO-ONE is talking about taking into account the atmospheric effects the Stratospheric Welsbach seeding spraying of toxins including aluminum, barium -see US Patent 5003186- or the Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin - US Patent 5286979, that have been dumped into the ionosphere since the 1990's to engineer the 'warming' aspect!!
but governments and businesses are scared enough to do something now. so, too late to debate about it, it is real, it is in the policy making process. And, you may feel free to maintain your old ways of living, just pay more.
I've watched this whole thing many times, along with related material. I do not understand why you doubt this. I just do not care for the moderator's style. I haven't offered any comments regarding opinions or facts expressed in this video. That is another matter, entirely.
kind of you, but perhaps I'm the one who is rash. I appreciate good journalism and I'm open to seeing things otherwise. At any event, his guests should be able to answer challenging questions if their views are sound.
of course, this Tony guy is coming from the belief that the skeptics are completely wrong...this whole debate is biased...look at the two industry "experts" they both are Global Warming believers. Try one industry skeptic and one non-skeptic.
The last guy said the truth about overpopulation and eugenics and everybody's laughing...stupid sheeps 99% , if you want to find more search on google about "Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don't , which is TRUE, find it yourself don't ignore the facts. This is corelated with peak-oil and overshoot. big big puzzle :) BE SMART!
The peasant is at present the best; and the peasant type should be master! But it is the kingdom of the rabble- I no longer allow anything to be imposed upon me. The rabble, however- that means, hodgepodge.
Rabble-hodgepodge: therein is everything mixed with everything, saint and swindler, gentleman and Jew, and every beast out of Noah's ark.
Love how they just pass over the nay sayers and don't take them seriously. There is a real fear among educated people who actually study history that population control may have something to do with the reason that the globalist propaganda machine is so overwhelmingly in support of Anthropomorphic global warming. Why won't anyone just take the question seriously and try and dispel some fears if they can? And, "I've talked to my colleagues in Nepal and the Congo," doesn't cut it Mr. Clean!
Study History, instead of just going along with idiot pseudoscience.
If you DO study your History, you will verify what these people said is entirely true. Not only was the environmental movement founded by eugenicists and nazi supporters (some were even true Nazis, like Prince Bernhardt of the WWF), but this whole scam WILL destroy your life. Poverty. Population reduction in the name of the 'enviroment'.
All because the trendies and the idiots wanted to go along. And didn't study.
Good questions by the woman at 4:20, and the man at around 9:45.
Just watch the mindless laughter of the ignorant masses as the guy at 9:45 states the obvious yet "unspeakable truth".
Even the question concerning the validity of the scientific method posed at around 8:25 was brushed off as being too esoteric or complex for the nature of the program, when it's the validity of the science itself which is the foundation of both sides of the argument!
best part at 4:20 :)
look up julian huxley, eugenics, WWF, club of rome
JFKEQUALS911 3 months ago
listen you self appointed human hating wimwam! hahhaah. no one is asking you to find us a way into the future. listen to that rothschild minion audition for kissingers position when he croaks. hahahhaha
sssssjjjj1 3 months ago
LISTEN TO THEM SCOFF AT THE GUY WHO MAKES SENSE. SCOFF SCOFF SCOFF......TO THE YACHT CLUB LOVEE.
sssssjjjj1 4 months ago
Eugenic is not bad at all but we must but it in a fair way !
samyman2006 6 months ago
On 8:11 onwards: We will soon have not just physical economics but also social chemistry. I’m sorry but some of the audience participation is just woefully poor. Democracy, I'm afraid, does not apply to everything. There is such a thing as expert knowledge and not all opinions are worth expending time on. A good example is the crackpot claim that the green movement was founded by eugenicists and "will destroy Africa". Climate change is not the only indication that all is not well!
stephenblackman2003a 6 months ago
@topographicoceans11 So I'm the conspiracy nut for believing that the Earth WON'T turn into some kind of barren wasteland which would barely support life. I'm sorry but saying we're responsible for the warming of our planet (which by the way I'm still waiting for since we've had several very cold winters and non existant summers here in England recently) is ridiculous. If you think CO2 is responsible then your ignoring 70% of what our planet's surface is made of. Water is the greenhouse king
mazk1985 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Join Protest against carbon tax
CANBERRA - the big one!
Date: 23 March
Time: 10:30am
Location: Parliament House
stopgillardscarbontaxcom
ezyboy6 11 months ago
This debate is a JOKE. I can't believe I watched it.
E1itetube 1 year ago
The "mankind's activities are the primary cause of climate change" crowd is wrong.
jscottupton 1 year ago
omg, those were some awful, awful questions.
GummoNZ 1 year ago
2:48 she may not be trying to slow down the development of Africa as she said but thats exactly what shes doing, theres no way around it
Jetsumo70 1 year ago
I realised something. I never was a big wrestling fan but it always bothered me why a company (WWF) doing "good" in the world couldn't just change its name and let WWE keep their old one but it's all about reputation isn't it. They built up WWF to seem all good and then drop AGW on us and get WWF to support it so everyones like "I'm listening to them cos they like panda's and panda's are cute"
On a related note Hulk Hogan once said "NWO is the only way to go". Maybe WWE are in on it too? lol
mazk1985 1 year ago
Comment removed
mazk1985 1 year ago
Jesus christ I thought I found a reasonable televised debate but nearly every good (and by good I mean blatant truth) question was ignored or laughed at.
Makes me fucking sick. I bet people in the audience were paid off to support AGW or am I giving man kind too much credit?
Are we really this asleep or is laughing when Hitler's mentioned a reaction to being in denial from us being in a much worst Hitler esque situation?
mazk1985 1 year ago
Well, looks like there's only gonna be one answer.
Get a gun. Get plenty of ammunition. Stock up on food and water. If any government pig gets in the way, shoot them. Period.
StraightOuttaDC 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEWS:
Methane Releases from Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated
NSF - March 4, 2010.
Research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is starting to leak large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
goog2k 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JUST FOUND THIS:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
"The global-average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly soared to +0.72 deg. C in January, 2010. This is the warmest January in the 32-year satellite-based data record."
To see the graph of the "UAH Globally Averaged Satellite-Based Temperature of the Lower Atmosphere, 1979-2010"
Search:
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
goog2k 1 year ago
Disgraceful how the audience members questions are being ignored. Now watching this segment makes me think the whole damn show is rigged. It has taught us nothing. Typical of TV debate shows. Its all pantomime.
CotardDelusion 2 years ago
I totally agree, well done on that comment. They are just answering the question they like and are assuming the audience will play into it
DubNinja7 1 year ago 2
@CotardDelusion Yes, pure manipulation of perceptions. You'll notice how this debate was just arranged to destroy 'skeptics' and people who actually say something of relevance (like those folks in the audience). This is not a debate, it's a whitewash, in the name of the idiot pseudoscience that is AGW.
TheLibertyChannel 1 year ago
Reality has a stability, a negative feedback, that if a little more CO2 appears - the transfer that happens any way keeps happening
When the sun warms - the earth radiates a little more (+4 watts/m2) for each degree Celsius - the IPCC models falsely predicts that as the earth warms it will radiate -3watts/m2 less per degree rise, so the models are 7watts wrong per square meter
(Thanks Dr Lindzen)
Martintfre 2 years ago
Could somebody clarify the criticsm given relating to Kepels work on statistics, I think that was the best point made in the debate, by anyone, because the problem with the climate movement is an underlying logical falsehood in not understanding what it really is that constitutes evidence,
Visfen 2 years ago
I dont understand why those 2 very good questions could not be answered!
Im no scientist but i understood what they were asking.
The way the guy passed over the questions of these 2 people was very suspicious and this whole progran has the stench of propaganda.
The guy in the middle looks like a smarmy prick. typical politician false smile
jordansupafly 2 years ago 2
don't you love journalism? the dude in the beanie and glasses makes an excellent point about observational methods and their possible falsehood, the moderator is too stupid to see its import and goes to another person. might as well have barking seals on the panel and as a moderator. laughing in the audience really shows the bias of most of those present. it is a shame society is so polarized and have no minds of their own. put a paper bag over our heads and we'll all die from starvation!
sw8741 2 years ago 4
The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project The venus project
FreemanGordon2009 2 years ago
The Venus Project is ridiculous.
Visfen 2 years ago
Have you come up with a better solution. because what going on now is a recipe for disaster. Tell me what about genetics what happens when the elite tap into that power source. Am all in favor of people becoming super human but in the hands of a sick, spiritually poor, callus, self serving culture. I think not. note these are negative aspects mentioned.
FreemanGordon2009 2 years ago
The Venus Project is not a solution, it is a goal.
It's like saying the problem with the world today is that there are people starving, so lets just have people be fed by magic!
This global warming blabal i so exaggerated.
You have a long way to go if you want to be a super human. You Venus Project morons haven't even managed to postulate a decent response or a plan for you to get there. Complete lunacy...
Visfen 2 years ago
@Visfen All of this shit is ridiculous
CodgersUnited 1 year ago
There is very much a high school mentality throughout the whole debate. They make the people that agree with the science of climate change the 'cool' kids and those that disagree with it the 'weird outcasts'. They didn't take any questions from the audience in this piece of those that questioned global warming and many of the crowd that agree with the science banded together and laughed quite cruely at some very relevant issues like the ones the last man asked which can be accounted for.
murrisj1 2 years ago
It's obvious how this debate is jumping over some very serious issues like the envoromentalists link to population reduction. This debate is obviously rigged big time and just shows how biased those who're running the show actually are. It's typical and tiresome.
Rob187ok 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ScienceNews
"These same methane clathrates are present today in the Arctic permafrost as well as below sea level, and remain dormant until triggered by warming.
"This is a major concern because it's possible that only a little warming can unleash this trapped methane. Unzippering the methane reservoir could warm the Earth TENS OF DEGREES, and the mechanism could be geologically very rapid."
Search : Large Methane Release Could Cause Abrupt Climate Change As Happened 635 Million Years Ago
goog2k 2 years ago
why the fuck are the laughing when he describes eugenics as hitler/rac escience? ignorants
zombiiination 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Net Solar Radiation has NOT INCREASED since 1975. There is excellent satellite data to prove it.
An 11 year solar cycle causes a 0.2C average oscillation every 5.5 years. However, with NO NET increase in solar radiation since 1975, arctic ice and mountain glaciers have lost 50% of their total mass.
Duhh!!!
Not one single Climate Change denier can explain it.
Search:
NASA GISS Do Variations in the Solar Cycle Affect Our Climate System
Also:
Climate Change: NASA's Eyes on the Earth
goog2k 2 years ago
The kid who challenged Pilger's credibility was definitely a plant. No question! It's a shame our most respected journalist has been censored in his own country.
bogans4truth 2 years ago
I've given this series my time. They have had their say to make their case.
Fuck this bullshit. No science. No data. No nothing, except the standard "we're destroying the planet".
Which is typical of British socialists and American Democrats.
I'm not wasting my time listening to your backwoods, hacknyed, hayseed, ignorant, chaw spittin' uneducated, unknowledgable, commie, pinko, socialist, bullshit... anymore.
Fuck you assholes. You had your chance.
:1 fngr salute: Fuck Off.
TSFL2 2 years ago
i have the same opinion... one day i will go to north and south pole, learn how to extract the information from them. She just attributed the entire environmentalist movement on one person, giving no tribute to the hippies... now thats an off ball.
oldarney 2 years ago 2
the authorities have nevere given a fuck about the people. Sheeple you should get that in your head.
ThoughCriminal912 2 years ago
Nicki williams you are going to jail for high treason.
chotaboy66 2 years ago
I love how the moderator shuts up people who disagree with him. Very very professional of him.
Timosaby 2 years ago
Why do G7 politicians always use environment as a crutch when asked about the development of 3rd world countries?
Timosaby 2 years ago
The environmentalist movement and the scientific community are not the same thing.
rileannas 2 years ago 12
Ohh god how dumb do they think we are?
Crooks!
ChristianCohn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Does anyone sense a conspiracy on Global Warming, especially when NO-ONE is talking about taking into account the atmospheric effects the Stratospheric Welsbach seeding spraying of toxins including aluminum, barium -see US Patent 5003186- or the Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin - US Patent 5286979, that have been dumped into the ionosphere since the 1990's to engineer the 'warming' aspect!!
cowinyourface 3 years ago
GLobal wARMING IS NOt REAL!!!!1111 FFFAKKKKKE
but governments and businesses are scared enough to do something now. so, too late to debate about it, it is real, it is in the policy making process. And, you may feel free to maintain your old ways of living, just pay more.
moxinghbian 3 years ago 2
I do not care for this moderator.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 2
Did you watch the entirety of the programme and the interview and show preceding it? doubt it
mojavewithteeth 3 years ago
I've watched this whole thing many times, along with related material. I do not understand why you doubt this. I just do not care for the moderator's style. I haven't offered any comments regarding opinions or facts expressed in this video. That is another matter, entirely.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago
Fair enough, rash comment. Just a fan of the journalists work taking undue offence
mojavewithteeth 3 years ago
kind of you, but perhaps I'm the one who is rash. I appreciate good journalism and I'm open to seeing things otherwise. At any event, his guests should be able to answer challenging questions if their views are sound.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago
LOL, End of the recording?!
curahack 3 years ago
Wow, what a pointless 'debate'. Why did they even open up the floor if they weren't prepared to take questions?
There are some really fundamental questions to be asked and nobody is asking them, let alone answering.
MojoPin07 3 years ago 2
of course, this Tony guy is coming from the belief that the skeptics are completely wrong...this whole debate is biased...look at the two industry "experts" they both are Global Warming believers. Try one industry skeptic and one non-skeptic.
dezznutz1001 3 years ago
dam what that woman said was we should help ourselves first before helping africans........
marineninga 3 years ago
dam what that woman said was we should help ourselves first before helping africans........
marineninga 3 years ago
On earth, nature does nuclear fusion from water: Power with no CO2!
JonThm 3 years ago
The last guy said the truth about overpopulation and eugenics and everybody's laughing...stupid sheeps 99% , if you want to find more search on google about "Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don't , which is TRUE, find it yourself don't ignore the facts. This is corelated with peak-oil and overshoot. big big puzzle :) BE SMART!
cipi604 4 years ago 3
These idiots are sooo full of shit! carbon dioxide increases as TEMPERATURE increases! NOT the other way around! Where the fuck is the SCIENCE!
smellyfooty 4 years ago
Earth? Been there, done that! Warm? cretaceous.wordpress Cool? interglacial.wordpress Earth, whats Next???
Blogengezer 4 years ago
The peasant is at present the best; and the peasant type should be master! But it is the kingdom of the rabble- I no longer allow anything to be imposed upon me. The rabble, however- that means, hodgepodge.
Rabble-hodgepodge: therein is everything mixed with everything, saint and swindler, gentleman and Jew, and every beast out of Noah's ark.
Nietzsche
duoinduovus 4 years ago
Love how they just pass over the nay sayers and don't take them seriously. There is a real fear among educated people who actually study history that population control may have something to do with the reason that the globalist propaganda machine is so overwhelmingly in support of Anthropomorphic global warming. Why won't anyone just take the question seriously and try and dispel some fears if they can? And, "I've talked to my colleagues in Nepal and the Congo," doesn't cut it Mr. Clean!
g0vinda 4 years ago 2
Environmental science = Nazi science? Godwin's Law strikes again!
jbd75274 4 years ago 4
@jbd75274
Study History, instead of just going along with idiot pseudoscience.
If you DO study your History, you will verify what these people said is entirely true. Not only was the environmental movement founded by eugenicists and nazi supporters (some were even true Nazis, like Prince Bernhardt of the WWF), but this whole scam WILL destroy your life. Poverty. Population reduction in the name of the 'enviroment'.
All because the trendies and the idiots wanted to go along. And didn't study.
TheLibertyChannel 1 year ago
Watch them cattle smile when the truth is spoken.
Hahaha he can see he says!
He can see! hahaha!
He claims he can see!
carlosfavielfont 4 years ago
Good questions by the woman at 4:20, and the man at around 9:45.
Just watch the mindless laughter of the ignorant masses as the guy at 9:45 states the obvious yet "unspeakable truth".
Even the question concerning the validity of the scientific method posed at around 8:25 was brushed off as being too esoteric or complex for the nature of the program, when it's the validity of the science itself which is the foundation of both sides of the argument!
occultfuel 4 years ago 7
@occultfuel You Idiot!!!!!
jfergu18 1 year ago
Ack, the guy in the black suit "OMG kill africa" and the weird guy saying he studies solar physics.
Bleh Lyndon Larouchites.
greyflcn 4 years ago