The smoke of your torment will go up forever in the lake of fire. Not because you're an atheist, but because you will leave this earth without Jesus. Doomed forever. Too late when you find that out. Pout all you want. Wont change a thing.
NO matter how loud you cry or shout that there is No God. Echo sound will hit you again and again that HE IS. No matter how hard you may try to justify your sins, you can not escape from them. Sinner must pay their account of Sins. You have only two options. Pay by your self or accept that Jesus Christ paid for you. There is no other way to escape. Accept The Gift of Salvation through Jesus Christ or be ready to get punishment for your sins which you have done in your body. I will advise, pleas
And if you can't determine their gender.. which angels are supposedly not supposed to have in the first place.. how can you actually know if they are gay or not?
We grow up thinking that beliefs are something to be proud of, but they’re really nothing but opinions one refuses to reconsider. Beliefs are easy. The stronger your beliefs are, the less open you are to growth and wisdom, because “strength of belief” is only the intensity with which you resist questioning yourself. As soon as you are proud of a belief, as soon as you think it adds something to who you are, then you’ve made it a part of your ego.
@j919or To make your comment in anyway true god would have to exist. And since you cant provide any quote any evidence that he does.Your statement has no basis in reality.
@moggy041279 Nah you ignorant fool, since you cant see the evidence all around you, it proves that you are blind and delusional. Which is the effect of the evil that dominates your thinking and keeps you in lies and darkness. Woe unto you!
@j919or You asked for an answer i gave a perectly good one. You can call me as many names as you like it wont change the fact that your dead wrong. (Note to self stop arguing with trolls).
@j919or Hmm logic and the formation of an argument. I can already do that. The problem is that every argument you can give for the existence of god. Is either patently untrue or uses false logic. If you can give me an argument that doesnt collapse when picked apart.
@moggy041279 I gave u the argument. It is that you are incapable of perceiving God with the 5 senses for God is non-material. I have received another sense from God to discern and perceive God. God is so real and I think about Him all day every day.
@j919or Ahh so effectivley you are one of the chosen few. The rest of us are screwed. One issue with that. Your argument is from personal experience. I have no reason to beleive that you are perceiving god. From my position you are either lying or delusional.
@moggy041279 Ok then, so u trust urself rather than the one that made u. Ur destiny is outerdarkness which is the independence that u desire. God warns that it will feel like fire.
@j919or As far as im concerned it wont feel like anything. The reason for this, Il be dead the end caput. I think i'm gonna enjoy life. And if your god does exist and wants to send me to hell. Just because i didnt beleive he existed then so be it.
I think that Lucifer is actually a good guy. He tries to give a dumb thought slave knowledge and God hates him for that. He sees a starving man in the desert and offers him bread, takes the blame for gods mistakes, punishes bad people, grants a man 7 wishes for soul while teaching him humility and making the most out of life and yet allows him to keep his soul, kills less people than god. Yah, lucifer is a nice guy. Too bad it ain't real
@yomamasapeach There have always been at least two perceptions of Lucifer in the Bible -- one as the ultimate anti-God (would-be replacement for God), and the other as sort of God's enforcer. IIRC, he doesn't do anything wicked in the Bible that God didn't first tell (or even dare) him to do.
the vatican the most evil of all lies , cheats , hate , bias , corruption , just a bunch of money/mongers looking for more ppl to fill their pot of gold ! to their hell with them all !
Maybe if the Vatican gave away all their money..their gold and stolen treasures and lived humbly like "God" wants...then I might give them more weight. If they opened their doors and let in students to go thru their vaults of information and history....maybe I would respect them a little. If they stood up to pedophiles and gave them over to the law...like Jesus told them too....I might not dismiss them as idiots. But as non of this will happen....idiots they remain:)
@Tarynus I was actually wrong in my original statement. No angel ever has it's gender defined but they are described as being masculine and have masculine names. Also there are several different kinds of Angels and some are not even close to being human like in appearance. Oh and fun fact. Of the different kinds of angels only the Cherub and the Seraphim are ever described as having wings. The popularized angel appearance is due to artistic expression.
@cpu46 I did not know that, shows what an artist's imagination can do, since most of the depictions of angels have faces like very young men or women & that makes it hard to tell
In the game Bayonetta, there are only two kinds of Angels that even come close to looking human, the Joys & Jubelius the Creator; all other enemies are either animal-based, vehicle-based (Kinship is literally a ship) or just odd shapes given a holy appearence
This is the reaction of an institution that is scared,they see that Atheism is on the rise and are attempting to put the fire out or at the very least contain it.
In 2011, the American Spectator citing research published in the International Bulletin of Missionary Research reported that atheism is on the decline as a whole in terms of adherents.[36]
The American Spectator declared:
The report estimates about 80,000 new Christians every day, 79,000 new Muslims every day, and 300 fewer atheists every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the West, while religion is thriving in the Global South."[37]
And yet in America, the home of evangelism, atheism and agnosticism has nearly doubled in the last 10 years.
I wonder at validity of your study. Firstly, it's conducted by a Christian missionary group. Secondly, every study I've read shows that atheism and agnosticism are increasing in the West. Recent USA today poll (google it) shows atheism is the fastest growing group in America. Nearly doubled in the last decade.
The difference being that I have a reasonable explanation for not believing in a study on the success of religion by a religious group. Your reason for not believing is simply because you don't want to.
@nigelbruce232 You only listed one source. He implied that he read several, which would mean you should make look at other studies as well.
Visit Wikipedia's "Demographics of atheism" to find multiple statistics on different areas. Understandably, as the page says, A christian-biased organization could bias interpretations of atheism/non-religion/anti-theism in their favor if they so desire.
Go check out the number of studies for rising atheism and the number of studies for declining, and values
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
I guess the Vatican didn't get the response they wanted from atheists, so now they're appealing to islamists:
"We cannot but denounce all forms of fanaticism and intimidation, the prejudices and the polemics, as well as the discrimination of which, at times, believers are the object both in the social and political life as well as in the mass media." - twocirclesDOTnet
@clarkbailey1973 No dumbass. They weren't. Just google the words *Hitler praying* and you'll see just a tip of the evidence that Nazi Germany was VERY christian.
Exactly right. If a parent leaves a child with something dangerous and the child hurts themselves with it who do we blame? The child? or the parent who placed the dangerous object within reach of the child? Yet somehow with the adam and eve story we blame the "children"(adam and eve) and not the one who caused it all, and to beat all knew it was going to happen. Thats like giving your kid a gun knowing they will shoot themselves and still doing it. Simply pathetic.
@thackythac are you saying I *shouldn't* give my toddler an active grenade in addition to the other toys to play with while I go about my business elsewhere in the house? I don't get it... I'm pretty sure it's ok if I specifically tell him/her not to pull the pin out, though before I explain to him/her the difference between right and wrong, and the definition of what a pin is, right?
Omg wtf poor girl holy shit I wanna give her a hug holy shit that must have sucked I hope her parents went and beat the fuck out of him and who ever rapet her holy shit.
You would have to be closed minded and EXTREMELY ignorant to claim that Christian dogma is in any way true. That would apply to ALL christians not just in general.
WOW ..its really funny how the majority of Atheists think that Christians are closed minded . LOL . and PLEASE do NOT say Christians in general, because honestly that just sounds EXTREMELY ignorant.
@Katana622 In what way is it hypocritical? Do you think the two people in the video have forced a raped woman to ask forgiveness for being raped, have sought debates with easy opponents, and fleeced a person with promises of magical curatives?
Or did you simply use the word hypocritical out of context?
@SinnFein4ever I believe so. He was a philosopher of the modern era. I was wrong in my last comment. Sartre was a contemporary philosopher and existentialist.
@micometer No relation to the WBC family. Looked it up on Wikipedia under Trinity Baptist Church (Concord, New Hampshire). Also, he wasn't the rapist; just tried to cover it up.
Evidently, anyone with the last name Phelps is destined to become religiously insane.
I love how the morons give their hard earned money to the church...the church dont pay taxes, they dont give back, and they tell you you'll go to hell if you dont believe....hahahha
Thats rich comparing what little dawkins makes on his books to real thieves like Kent Hovind, Joyce Meyers, Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Pat Robertson, David Miscavige and etc. have stolen from people. Thats just what i could think of in a couple seconds the list could go on for a number of pages.
@dex1391 Have you ever listened to Dawkins? He's one of the most polite people speaking on TV right now. The rudest thing he ever said was a quote from somebody else.
@dex1391 I just said he isn't a hate monger; he's a biologist, who wrote 22 books on biology and 2 books about religion, and how it contradicts science. He doesn't insult people (like you're insulting him right now), and he has proof for every claim he makes.
I'll repeat my question: have you ever listened to the man? Or do you just mechanically repeat what other people tell you?
Of course he insults people. I've seen dozens of his speeches and he's insulting in each and every one. He is a bigot. He is a hate monger.
NO... He doesn't have proof for his claims about religion. That's a lie. He has absolutely zero education on theology.... If you want to read his biology books... fine... But if you read anything from him about religion.... you're reading something totally useless. He's not qualified.
@dex1391 Theology already presumes the existence of a god. It's in the name. By definition atheists do not *need* to be grounded in theology - any more than you need to be grounded in "Lord of the Rings" to not believe in Orcs.
You're an idiot. Theology is the study of religion. Nothing more nothing less. Dawkins has ZERO education in theology. When you sheep buy his books... you're buying completely unqualified material.
But keep shelling out your money to make him rich. That's all he really wants anyway...
"Theology is the study of religion. Nothing more nothing less."
I thought it was the study of a deity or the divine, silly me.
And you don't have to study theology to point out the sillyness in a particular theology. I have yet to find a theologian that can coherently argue against any of Dawkin's arguments with regards to theology, can you point one out?
You're way too obvious, you gotta turn it down a bit for it not to be apparent that you're trolling. Of course it is kind of funny to go at people blatent troll stuff like "why do you hate America", but I'm just giving you a heads-up. Put another way -- Obvious troll is obvious. Now you know, and the knowledge shall help you become a better troll!
I made no definitions up. Sorry that you have such a limited understanding of the English language. I'll assume that you're just another failure of public schooling.
@dex1391 The definition of atheism is "Lack in a belief in a deity/god".
No the doctrine or belief that there is no god, since that my friend, would be faith-based.
Nobody can prove there is or isn't a god, yet christians are the ones claiming one exists, so you carry the burden of proof, which you have continuously failed to meet.
It's quite funny that you think I wouldn't notice when you alter definitions in order to fill in your gap in argumentation.
@dex1391 Your misunderstanding is perfectly reasonable, as many dictionaries contradict each other, i can find plenty of dictionaries that define it as "a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods" (copy/pasted) as well, to clear up the contradiction try looking at the word itself, the "A" in atheism is a Greek prefix meaning "without" for example; amoral or asexual, therefore a - theist means without - belief in god.
@dex1391 If you are indeed correct about the definition of atheist then most self proclaimed atheists (including me and the people on the atheist experience) aren't actually atheists, i don't claim that a god doesn't exist, and no amount of semantic debate will change that, the idea that someones beliefs are somehow dependent on the definition of a word is ludicrous, also if i claimed there wasn't a god but that atheism didn't necessarily mean that, i would still claim there's no god.
@dex1391 If you're seriously asking me that question after I clearly stated that I don't claim a god doesn't exist then you're either a troll or you're brain dead.
@dex1391 well it was an observation really, but i guess making the baseless assumption that i hate Christians is a convenient way of dismissing what i have to say, which so far you've completely ignored, or at least haven't managed to either agree with or refute, if you're not interested in a discussion then i don't see any reason to continue attempting one, so unless you give me something worth replying to i shall as you say be gone.
@88gertjan88 Ultumatly a lack of belief or belief in something not existing are the same thing. Its a negtive statment either way, and the buren of proof is on the positive.
@dex1391 I know see where your problem lies, you seem to have used pro-christian websites, that have translated the old greek word for atheism to mean something different. The old greek word simply meant godless, now if you weren't so blinded by your fairytale book and actually looked into things a bit more, you might not make such shameful mistakes. Well, that may be exaggerated seeing as you're not really the brightest bulb in the box.
@dex1391 You do the exact same thing and looking at your page in which you seem to glorify your own inability to communicate and have debates is quite hilarious, since they all know you're the one antagonizing here. You're either an obvious troll or the most pathetic person to ever tread the earth.
Also, as I said before, I prefer Hitchens and on top of that, in the Netherlands Dawkins' books are practically impossible to find, yet I wouldn't expect an obese god-licking american to know this.
If you don't care about your future why should someone else care? You'll remember this youtube clip in hell ;D
jct09100 1 week ago
The smoke of your torment will go up forever in the lake of fire. Not because you're an atheist, but because you will leave this earth without Jesus. Doomed forever. Too late when you find that out. Pout all you want. Wont change a thing.
jct09100 1 week ago
@jct09100 no one is pouting--we are laughing at your dumb ass...
sepiasiren 5 hours ago
@samaroo96 Cute, so where'd you copy and paste it from?
SGTSlashRazor 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NO matter how loud you cry or shout that there is No God. Echo sound will hit you again and again that HE IS. No matter how hard you may try to justify your sins, you can not escape from them. Sinner must pay their account of Sins. You have only two options. Pay by your self or accept that Jesus Christ paid for you. There is no other way to escape. Accept The Gift of Salvation through Jesus Christ or be ready to get punishment for your sins which you have done in your body. I will advise, pleas
samaroo96 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Join in on Debates at:
religiousdebates.co.uk
fletchernibiru 3 weeks ago
A homosexual expression? Sounds like wishful thinking to me.
TomVodkaCollins 1 month ago in playlist More videos from FFreeThinker
@TomVodkaCollins
And if you can't determine their gender.. which angels are supposedly not supposed to have in the first place.. how can you actually know if they are gay or not?
Estragon17 2 weeks ago
I didn't think angels HAD a gender anyway. Doesn't the Bible say they are neither male nor female?
littlebit19801 1 month ago
@littlebit19801
Didn't the bible also say they had sex with women and created a race of giants and monsters called The Nephilim?
The answer is: Yes.
Good thing the bibles all fictional.
Numinous123 3 weeks ago
What's the name of the song in the beginning? Sounded so cool!
Pinkaugust 1 month ago
We grow up thinking that beliefs are something to be proud of, but they’re really nothing but opinions one refuses to reconsider. Beliefs are easy. The stronger your beliefs are, the less open you are to growth and wisdom, because “strength of belief” is only the intensity with which you resist questioning yourself. As soon as you are proud of a belief, as soon as you think it adds something to who you are, then you’ve made it a part of your ego.
Just some food for thought.
StygianDawn 1 month ago 6
@StygianDawn Well said.
LambdaQuarks 1 month ago
"Did you enjoy it?" That is disgusting. That whole story is disgusting.
DisturbingRainbow 1 month ago
Not so much "Reach out and touch someone", more "Reach out and touch someones' kids"
EmmittBrownBTTF1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good Vids. Very Infomative..
Flusercom 1 month ago
Good Video. Thanks for shared this vids
Spasatcom 1 month ago
I'm sure the Vatican loves to reach out and touch (little boys) people.
nocliper101 1 month ago
@nocliper101 We are in agreement that the RCC/vaticant is an evil false teaching domineering sheming and overall nasty organization.
j919or 1 month ago
i'd be quite happy to take em up on the offer to debate.
moggy041279 2 months ago
@moggy041279 The RCC is evil and so is atheism. Both are vents of mans insistence on playing and competing with God
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or wow are you really that far gone. I would seek some help if i were you.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 Please support ur assertion that what I typed was in any way erroneous...or admit that you cant.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or To make your comment in anyway true god would have to exist. And since you cant provide any quote any evidence that he does.Your statement has no basis in reality.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 Nah you ignorant fool, since you cant see the evidence all around you, it proves that you are blind and delusional. Which is the effect of the evil that dominates your thinking and keeps you in lies and darkness. Woe unto you!
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Aw! It's the idiot? I thought you said your god does not exist?
1Lanavis1 1 month ago
@j919or You asked for an answer i gave a perectly good one. You can call me as many names as you like it wont change the fact that your dead wrong. (Note to self stop arguing with trolls).
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 Nah. Let me simplifiy. The problem is not with the evidence but with ur ability to understand and perceive it.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Ahh ok so how am i supposed to do that then since you apparently can.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 You should start with reading some books on evidence and logic and the formation of an argument.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Hmm logic and the formation of an argument. I can already do that. The problem is that every argument you can give for the existence of god. Is either patently untrue or uses false logic. If you can give me an argument that doesnt collapse when picked apart.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 I gave u the argument. It is that you are incapable of perceiving God with the 5 senses for God is non-material. I have received another sense from God to discern and perceive God. God is so real and I think about Him all day every day.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Ahh so effectivley you are one of the chosen few. The rest of us are screwed. One issue with that. Your argument is from personal experience. I have no reason to beleive that you are perceiving god. From my position you are either lying or delusional.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 nah. If you want God to take control of ur life and change u , He will. Why in the world would you not want that?
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Id rarther keep control of my own life thanks. What church are you anyway.
moggy041279 1 month ago
@moggy041279 Ok then, so u trust urself rather than the one that made u. Ur destiny is outerdarkness which is the independence that u desire. God warns that it will feel like fire.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or As far as im concerned it wont feel like anything. The reason for this, Il be dead the end caput. I think i'm gonna enjoy life. And if your god does exist and wants to send me to hell. Just because i didnt beleive he existed then so be it.
moggy041279 1 month ago
If the lady on the right ever visits Japan and feels like a fuck and/or consversation,
let us be able to get in touch.
naganokumas 2 months ago
Stop talking esoteric nonsense. No one understands your analogies
Pigroota 2 months ago
I think that Lucifer is actually a good guy. He tries to give a dumb thought slave knowledge and God hates him for that. He sees a starving man in the desert and offers him bread, takes the blame for gods mistakes, punishes bad people, grants a man 7 wishes for soul while teaching him humility and making the most out of life and yet allows him to keep his soul, kills less people than god. Yah, lucifer is a nice guy. Too bad it ain't real
yomamasapeach 3 months ago 49
@yomamasapeach There have always been at least two perceptions of Lucifer in the Bible -- one as the ultimate anti-God (would-be replacement for God), and the other as sort of God's enforcer. IIRC, he doesn't do anything wicked in the Bible that God didn't first tell (or even dare) him to do.
50zcarsman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yomamasapeach ""lucifer is a nice guy""
You like lucifer/satan bc you are children of the devil which means that you share his rebelllious essense.
Satan is the deceiver and you are the deceived. All those that reject God are sitting ducks for the deception.
j919or 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the vatican the most evil of all lies , cheats , hate , bias , corruption , just a bunch of money/mongers looking for more ppl to fill their pot of gold ! to their hell with them all !
flexbrat 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flexbrat You left out rapists.
acr08807 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mike: the Vatican always want to reaches out and touches someone.
Me: that how they usually get into trouble
Revan416 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe if the Vatican gave away all their money..their gold and stolen treasures and lived humbly like "God" wants...then I might give them more weight. If they opened their doors and let in students to go thru their vaults of information and history....maybe I would respect them a little. If they stood up to pedophiles and gave them over to the law...like Jesus told them too....I might not dismiss them as idiots. But as non of this will happen....idiots they remain:)
55Freya 4 months ago
"Not clear if they are male or female"
I'm pretty sure that angels are supposed to be androgynous . You would think a priest would know that.
cpu46 4 months ago
@cpu46 Despite the fact they look quite feminine, angels often have male names like Michael or David
Tarynus 4 months ago
@Tarynus I was actually wrong in my original statement. No angel ever has it's gender defined but they are described as being masculine and have masculine names. Also there are several different kinds of Angels and some are not even close to being human like in appearance. Oh and fun fact. Of the different kinds of angels only the Cherub and the Seraphim are ever described as having wings. The popularized angel appearance is due to artistic expression.
cpu46 4 months ago
@cpu46 I did not know that, shows what an artist's imagination can do, since most of the depictions of angels have faces like very young men or women & that makes it hard to tell
In the game Bayonetta, there are only two kinds of Angels that even come close to looking human, the Joys & Jubelius the Creator; all other enemies are either animal-based, vehicle-based (Kinship is literally a ship) or just odd shapes given a holy appearence
Tarynus 4 months ago
thats right... Angels looks gay
Danovio 4 months ago
This is the reaction of an institution that is scared,they see that Atheism is on the rise and are attempting to put the fire out or at the very least contain it.
DastardlyDereK 5 months ago
In 2011, the American Spectator citing research published in the International Bulletin of Missionary Research reported that atheism is on the decline as a whole in terms of adherents.[36]
The American Spectator declared:
The report estimates about 80,000 new Christians every day, 79,000 new Muslims every day, and 300 fewer atheists every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the West, while religion is thriving in the Global South."[37]
nigelbruce232 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nigelbruce232
And yet in America, the home of evangelism, atheism and agnosticism has nearly doubled in the last 10 years.
I wonder at validity of your study. Firstly, it's conducted by a Christian missionary group. Secondly, every study I've read shows that atheism and agnosticism are increasing in the West. Recent USA today poll (google it) shows atheism is the fastest growing group in America. Nearly doubled in the last decade.
ApatheistRiftBoxing 4 months ago
@ApatheistRiftBoxing Just as you don't believe the sources I quoted......I don't believe the sources you quoted
nigelbruce232 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nigelbruce232
The difference being that I have a reasonable explanation for not believing in a study on the success of religion by a religious group. Your reason for not believing is simply because you don't want to.
ApatheistRiftBoxing 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nigelbruce232 You only listed one source. He implied that he read several, which would mean you should make look at other studies as well.
Visit Wikipedia's "Demographics of atheism" to find multiple statistics on different areas. Understandably, as the page says, A christian-biased organization could bias interpretations of atheism/non-religion/anti-theism in their favor if they so desire.
Go check out the number of studies for rising atheism and the number of studies for declining, and values
MsHojat 4 months ago
@autodog652 thanks.
Autodog652 5 months ago
Good point there autodog652
Autodog652 5 months ago
Religion tries to scare people into believing. Christiananity has hell so detailed and so many books about it. But heaven is vaige.
Autodog652 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that undirected natural laws can bring about an airplane or a living cell. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all its is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 5 months ago
I guess the Vatican didn't get the response they wanted from atheists, so now they're appealing to islamists:
"We cannot but denounce all forms of fanaticism and intimidation, the prejudices and the polemics, as well as the discrimination of which, at times, believers are the object both in the social and political life as well as in the mass media." - twocirclesDOTnet
Can you say "delusional?"
YY4Me133 5 months ago
I like this chubby Libbie girl.
kafkazinho 6 months ago in playlist Liked
lol lost
Dayoldsushy 6 months ago
wooooooooooot!! Matt Dillahuntyyyyy!
HeyHeyHarmonicaLuke 6 months ago
diabolic gay angels
to go with the peadophilic clergy no doupt
lol
couldnt they just paint beards on them ?
whitesquirrel7 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
After the pope claimed that the nazis were a *force of secularism* then he can go fuck himself.
Winterwolf00 7 months ago
@Winterwolf00 And they weren't?
clarkbailey1973 6 months ago
@clarkbailey1973 No, Hitler himself opposed atheists and secularism.
Winterwolf00 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@clarkbailey1973 No dumbass. They weren't. Just google the words *Hitler praying* and you'll see just a tip of the evidence that Nazi Germany was VERY christian.
Winterwolf00 3 months ago
GAY ANGELS hahah when were angels not gay!? and androgyny is awesome for that very power to upset the status quo!!!
PimpMyParadigm 7 months ago
The POPE is DOPE!
Reaper081087 7 months ago
if the vatican had the chance they would destroy us with no remorse
FreeworldJTP 7 months ago
Hot damn, who is that woman?
joemaccer 8 months ago 2
christians came to my door today... i told them to go fuck themselves
Mikeybetts 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
religion should pay taxes...since they dont i dont understand why i have to
MadMAn12gauge 9 months ago 10
@MadMAn12gauge i think they do
FIGHTFANNERD3 8 months ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 Nope no taxes for religions.. In America at least, Idk about other countries. Pretty fucked up though...
DaKrazyJokesta 8 months ago
The Vatican can go Fuck themselves!!!!
Allanfries 9 months ago 4
Great to have a balanced viewpoint on You Tube eh?
no1hoopsman 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Blame the victim" pretty much sums up the Adam and Eve story: set them up to fail, then blame all the troubles of the world on that failure.
NevilleRhysBarnes 9 months ago 46
@NevilleRhysBarnes
Exactly right. If a parent leaves a child with something dangerous and the child hurts themselves with it who do we blame? The child? or the parent who placed the dangerous object within reach of the child? Yet somehow with the adam and eve story we blame the "children"(adam and eve) and not the one who caused it all, and to beat all knew it was going to happen. Thats like giving your kid a gun knowing they will shoot themselves and still doing it. Simply pathetic.
thackythac 9 months ago
@thackythac are you saying I *shouldn't* give my toddler an active grenade in addition to the other toys to play with while I go about my business elsewhere in the house? I don't get it... I'm pretty sure it's ok if I specifically tell him/her not to pull the pin out, though before I explain to him/her the difference between right and wrong, and the definition of what a pin is, right?
Enginmaster 8 months ago
Omg wtf poor girl holy shit I wanna give her a hug holy shit that must have sucked I hope her parents went and beat the fuck out of him and who ever rapet her holy shit.
GUNS4MIKE1234 9 months ago
You would have to be closed minded and EXTREMELY ignorant to claim that Christian dogma is in any way true. That would apply to ALL christians not just in general.
buteforce 9 months ago
WOW ..its really funny how the majority of Atheists think that Christians are closed minded . LOL . and PLEASE do NOT say Christians in general, because honestly that just sounds EXTREMELY ignorant.
Nessakeepsitreal517 9 months ago
i'd tap that
horbergaren 9 months ago
So these guys are about just showing negative aspects about religion without showing any other side? Hypocritical and boring.
Katana622 9 months ago
@Katana622 In what way is it hypocritical? Do you think the two people in the video have forced a raped woman to ask forgiveness for being raped, have sought debates with easy opponents, and fleeced a person with promises of magical curatives?
Or did you simply use the word hypocritical out of context?
UnitedKingdomify 9 months ago
The reason why they are reaching out is because the ROman Church knows that they are getting creamed in debates and thier belief is based on BS.
wowamonn 10 months ago
2:29-2:31
Who's John Paul Sautra?
SinnFein4ever 10 months ago
@SinnFein4ever A modern philosopher.
SickMouth 10 months ago
@SickMouth
What's he famous for saying?
SinnFein4ever 10 months ago
@SickMouth
This man?
wikipedia/wiki/Jean-Paul_Sartre
SinnFein4ever 10 months ago
Comment removed
SickMouth 10 months ago
@SinnFein4ever I believe so. He was a philosopher of the modern era. I was wrong in my last comment. Sartre was a contemporary philosopher and existentialist.
SickMouth 10 months ago
@SickMouth
Thanks for the tip.
I'll do some reading up him (not just from Wikkipedea).
SinnFein4ever 10 months ago
Talking about a "Phelps who raped a girl." Would that happen to be the Phelps from the Westboro Baptist Church?
micometer 10 months ago
@micometer No relation to the WBC family. Looked it up on Wikipedia under Trinity Baptist Church (Concord, New Hampshire). Also, he wasn't the rapist; just tried to cover it up.
Evidently, anyone with the last name Phelps is destined to become religiously insane.
multitudeofidols 9 months ago
Why did I think the worst when I saw the title of this vid?
Oh yeah...fecking perverts and wasters.
HarrysSecret 11 months ago
I love how the morons give their hard earned money to the church...the church dont pay taxes, they dont give back, and they tell you you'll go to hell if you dont believe....hahahha
Mannixxx 11 months ago
When they reach out, watch your pecker, they're known for that.
Mannixxx 11 months ago 79
Seeing homosexuality in angels?
The priest doth protest too much, methinks.
coltharpnicholas 1 year ago
let's donate and keep the show running
JohnF30Music 1 year ago
i vote for sending matt and jeff there lol jeff dee ftw
cardgrey 1 year ago
Lady is cute :)
oviatb 1 year ago
Thats rich comparing what little dawkins makes on his books to real thieves like Kent Hovind, Joyce Meyers, Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, Pat Robertson, David Miscavige and etc. have stolen from people. Thats just what i could think of in a couple seconds the list could go on for a number of pages.
Chrisjseattle1 1 year ago
that weird obsession with theists, and that priest, that guy must be attracted to him
Sosarian 1 year ago
FAIL... they don't want BIGOTED atheists. Not all atheists are bigots. Hitchens and Dawkins obviously are.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 Have you ever listened to Dawkins? He's one of the most polite people speaking on TV right now. The rudest thing he ever said was a quote from somebody else.
StrikaAmaru 1 year ago
@StrikaAmaru
Dawkins is a piece of shit bigot... I have no use for hate mongers...
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 I just said he isn't a hate monger; he's a biologist, who wrote 22 books on biology and 2 books about religion, and how it contradicts science. He doesn't insult people (like you're insulting him right now), and he has proof for every claim he makes.
I'll repeat my question: have you ever listened to the man? Or do you just mechanically repeat what other people tell you?
StrikaAmaru 1 year ago
@StrikaAmaru
Of course he insults people. I've seen dozens of his speeches and he's insulting in each and every one. He is a bigot. He is a hate monger.
NO... He doesn't have proof for his claims about religion. That's a lie. He has absolutely zero education on theology.... If you want to read his biology books... fine... But if you read anything from him about religion.... you're reading something totally useless. He's not qualified.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 Theology already presumes the existence of a god. It's in the name. By definition atheists do not *need* to be grounded in theology - any more than you need to be grounded in "Lord of the Rings" to not believe in Orcs.
Intiom 1 year ago
@Intiom
You're an idiot. Theology is the study of religion. Nothing more nothing less. Dawkins has ZERO education in theology. When you sheep buy his books... you're buying completely unqualified material.
But keep shelling out your money to make him rich. That's all he really wants anyway...
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391
"Theology is the study of religion. Nothing more nothing less."
I thought it was the study of a deity or the divine, silly me.
And you don't have to study theology to point out the sillyness in a particular theology. I have yet to find a theologian that can coherently argue against any of Dawkin's arguments with regards to theology, can you point one out?
Feralus69 1 year ago
@Feralus69
Dawkins has zero evidence for any of his claims when it comes to religion. He's an uneducated bigot.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 HAHAHAHA, you bloody idiot.
88gertjan88 1 year ago
@88gertjan88
Childish insults are foolish just like your religion.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 My "religion", that's funny because I don't have one.
I just found your comment extremely ironic, since you're the uneducated bigot here.
88gertjan88 1 year ago
@88gertjan88
Sure you do. Atheism may not be a religion but bigoted fundies like you treat it like one. You follow blindly with zero evidence.
Keep following Dawkins like the mindless sheep that you are.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391 Blindly follow Not believing in a deity, hmm yes, I do think that's possible.
I prefer Hitchens over Dawkins, thank you.
And these blunt generalizations you make, make you seem very intelligent.
And what fundament would I be fundamentalist about?
You're legally retarded, no other words for it, you lack the basic functions of a brain, you're nothing more than a sound-making doll.
88gertjan88 1 year ago
@88gertjan88
Fundies like you crack me up.
a·the·ism /ˈeɪθiˌɪzəm/ Show Spelled[ey-thee-iz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
the doctrine or belief that there is no god.
Your foolish faith based belief system is embarrassing.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391
You're way too obvious, you gotta turn it down a bit for it not to be apparent that you're trolling. Of course it is kind of funny to go at people blatent troll stuff like "why do you hate America", but I'm just giving you a heads-up. Put another way -- Obvious troll is obvious. Now you know, and the knowledge shall help you become a better troll!
EikC 1 year ago
@EikC
Fundie bigot.
Your hypocrisy is incredible.
Just another lying bigot atheist.
dex1391 1 year ago
@dex1391
Yeah, still not working, sorry.
EikC 1 year ago
@EikC
Whatever you say fundie bigot.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 Lol @ making up own definitions to back up your statements.
88gertjan88 1 year ago
@88gertjan88
I made no definitions up. Sorry that you have such a limited understanding of the English language. I'll assume that you're just another failure of public schooling.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 The definition of atheism is "Lack in a belief in a deity/god".
No the doctrine or belief that there is no god, since that my friend, would be faith-based.
Nobody can prove there is or isn't a god, yet christians are the ones claiming one exists, so you carry the burden of proof, which you have continuously failed to meet.
It's quite funny that you think I wouldn't notice when you alter definitions in order to fill in your gap in argumentation.
88gertjan88 11 months ago 8
@88gertjan88
Atheism is faith based.
a·the·ism /ˈeɪθiˌɪzəm/ Show Spelled[ey-thee-iz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.
the doctrine or belief that there is no god.
That's a copy and paste.
The burden of proof is on the party trying to convert.
You claim that there is no God. If you wish to convert me to your faith... the burden of proof is upon you.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 Your misunderstanding is perfectly reasonable, as many dictionaries contradict each other, i can find plenty of dictionaries that define it as "a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods" (copy/pasted) as well, to clear up the contradiction try looking at the word itself, the "A" in atheism is a Greek prefix meaning "without" for example; amoral or asexual, therefore a - theist means without - belief in god.
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@HHHonoth
LOL I don't need the etymology. Most self proclaimed atheists adopt that position so they can attack religion and not defend their own position.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 If you are indeed correct about the definition of atheist then most self proclaimed atheists (including me and the people on the atheist experience) aren't actually atheists, i don't claim that a god doesn't exist, and no amount of semantic debate will change that, the idea that someones beliefs are somehow dependent on the definition of a word is ludicrous, also if i claimed there wasn't a god but that atheism didn't necessarily mean that, i would still claim there's no god.
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@HHHonoth
What's your evidence that there's no God?
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 If you're seriously asking me that question after I clearly stated that I don't claim a god doesn't exist then you're either a troll or you're brain dead.
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@HHHonot
So now you have to resort to insults. You must just be another Christian hating bigot. Be gone...
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 well it was an observation really, but i guess making the baseless assumption that i hate Christians is a convenient way of dismissing what i have to say, which so far you've completely ignored, or at least haven't managed to either agree with or refute, if you're not interested in a discussion then i don't see any reason to continue attempting one, so unless you give me something worth replying to i shall as you say be gone.
HHHonoth 11 months ago
@HHHonoth
Bigots do hate for no reason. Act like a bigot and get treated like one..
dex1391 11 months ago
@88gertjan88 Ultumatly a lack of belief or belief in something not existing are the same thing. Its a negtive statment either way, and the buren of proof is on the positive.
DragonGreenFire 11 months ago
@dex1391 I know see where your problem lies, you seem to have used pro-christian websites, that have translated the old greek word for atheism to mean something different. The old greek word simply meant godless, now if you weren't so blinded by your fairytale book and actually looked into things a bit more, you might not make such shameful mistakes. Well, that may be exaggerated seeing as you're not really the brightest bulb in the box.
88gertjan88 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@88gertjan88
Fail.. I don't need to use a pro-Christian website.
You're too stupid to know... just how stupid you are.
dex1391 11 months ago
@88gertjan88
LOL... retard. More baseless claims.
Keep buying those Dawkins books. Make him another million. idiot.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 You do the exact same thing and looking at your page in which you seem to glorify your own inability to communicate and have debates is quite hilarious, since they all know you're the one antagonizing here. You're either an obvious troll or the most pathetic person to ever tread the earth.
Also, as I said before, I prefer Hitchens and on top of that, in the Netherlands Dawkins' books are practically impossible to find, yet I wouldn't expect an obese god-licking american to know this.
88gertjan88 11 months ago
@88gertjan88
LOL have a hard time defending your BS so you have to resort to calling me a troll... priceless.
Your inability to put a thought together is your own fault. It's not my fault that you're stupid.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 Fail at reading, much?
I don't resort to anything, you're the one throwing insults about, idiot.
88gertjan88 11 months ago
@88gertjan88
Of course you did.. LOL You love throwing out insults. It makes you feel like a big man doesn't it.
Keep buying those Dawkins books. Shell out your cash for those fairy tales. LOL
Tell me. How does he taste?
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 You're hilarious, it's like watching a turtle trying to get back on his paws.
88gertjan88 11 months ago
@88gertjan88
Wow going from "I didn't insult" ... directly into more insults.
Wow... you are really brainwashed.
dex1391 11 months ago
@dex1391 *sigh* You're idiotic and pathetic.
88gertjan88 11 months ago