Thanks for clarifying this Matt. You're absolutely right, writing good content and logically linking pages within your site are not only good for visitors to your site but they make Googlebots happy too!
This a very interesting video. I love Google posting videos like this so that they can help educate the next generation of web developers. Keep up the good work guys.
Hi Matt. Even if it looks like a PR Sculpting question it's mainly a question on how Google currently handles multiple links. Unfortunately you focused only how the initial academic paper described PageRank. Please note that the original Paper did not clarify how self-links & multiple votes were handled and that is why several other academic papers were published to study these cases (Inside PageRank by Bianchinι, Gori & Scarselli).
Unless I've misinterpreted this video it's still an indirect answer, since he's talking about the original formula for PageRank. He doesn't talk about the current formulation which I suspect has changed, and instead focuses on usability (which isn't a bad thing, but doesn't answer the question).
Matt, the first half of this is the most direct answer to the kind of question you usually answer indirectly I've ever seen you kick up! Seriously? you can mold the value of your PageRank that way and you're saying so out loud?
Umm . . . but yeah, what you said afterward is sure right, huh? Valuable content means more than anything else!
@whichgroup Well, if you had only page B linking to page A (with links to no other pages), then it wouldn't matter if you had just 1 link or 10000 links. It would still pass the same amount of link juice. I suppose it is different when there are more pages involved, since (as Mat says) all links get equal amount of juice. Therefore some pages may get 2/4 of the total juice, while others get 1/4 (for example).
I think Matt is hedging his answer here:
"according to the original formula" of pagerank ....
I don't think that quite qualifies as a definitive answer.
ryanunderdown 2 weeks ago
What about First Link Priority?
MissoulaCarpet 1 month ago
wikipedia must have a page rank of 100000000000000000
00lucky7 1 month ago
It's always good being creative than tricky.
ghanachild 2 months ago
Thanks for clarifying this Matt. You're absolutely right, writing good content and logically linking pages within your site are not only good for visitors to your site but they make Googlebots happy too!
DigitecSEOClass 3 months ago
Comment removed
DigitecSEOClass 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This a very interesting video. I love Google posting videos like this so that they can help educate the next generation of web developers. Keep up the good work guys.
mr24bd 3 months ago
Exists any way, how can I provide Slovak subtitles to this video?
I asked this in webmaster central, but i didn't get required answer.
JANciJ 4 months ago
Hi Matt. Even if it looks like a PR Sculpting question it's mainly a question on how Google currently handles multiple links. Unfortunately you focused only how the initial academic paper described PageRank. Please note that the original Paper did not clarify how self-links & multiple votes were handled and that is why several other academic papers were published to study these cases (Inside PageRank by Bianchinι, Gori & Scarselli).
webseoanalytics 5 months ago 3
I dont think This is REAL Matt :PSeriously LOL here.. I was in wrong impression about multiple links on the same page :D ..
He said the first part loudly real loudly
santuwebstr 5 months ago
I think he answered the question perfectly. He said that none of it really matters...because it doesn't.
sporkmarketing 5 months ago
Unless I've misinterpreted this video it's still an indirect answer, since he's talking about the original formula for PageRank. He doesn't talk about the current formulation which I suspect has changed, and instead focuses on usability (which isn't a bad thing, but doesn't answer the question).
PsychoPatrickBateman 5 months ago
Holy COW!
Matt, the first half of this is the most direct answer to the kind of question you usually answer indirectly I've ever seen you kick up! Seriously? you can mold the value of your PageRank that way and you're saying so out loud?
Umm . . . but yeah, what you said afterward is sure right, huh? Valuable content means more than anything else!
jeffyablon 5 months ago
*changes global footer links*
Home | Home | Home | Home | Home | Home
SEOMofo 5 months ago 15
So you can link multiple times from one page to another and it benefits. I got the impression previously that multiple links were discounted.
whichgroup 5 months ago
@whichgroup Well, if you had only page B linking to page A (with links to no other pages), then it wouldn't matter if you had just 1 link or 10000 links. It would still pass the same amount of link juice. I suppose it is different when there are more pages involved, since (as Mat says) all links get equal amount of juice. Therefore some pages may get 2/4 of the total juice, while others get 1/4 (for example).
gorangrooves 5 months ago