Added: 3 years ago
From: cplai
Views: 10,982
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You know, when you play this video without the audio, it looks kinda bad. Awful and amateuristic actually. Most of the time you get to see endless repetitions of out-of-focus blades spinning around and bad shaky close-ups of the guy talking.

    Yes, I know, this goes for most documentaries nowadays.

  • We can reduce CO2 by a factor of 9

  • Boy I really want to applaud this video but it's meaningless without stats. Do you know how many "novel" and "dna-shaped" VAWT type wind turbine designs there are? About a bazillion. Just tell us the cost per kWh produced ... one number ... come on, it's not that hard. Do the math and then tell us. You have 3 models? Then give it for each model. Cost (including install)/(warranted lifetime(in hours)*nominal Wattage output for Chicago). Plug in the numbers then tell us the result. please.

  • VeRY, VERY coool; Like to see a residential-scale kit with nominal licensing fee IF this design is patent-protected; That would REALLY help revolutionalize independant, small-scale alternative use-point-source energy economics. Distribute the means of energy creation, NOT the transport of energy. Democritization of energy, power to the people not the rentiers.

  • Thomas Edison suggested this in 1889. Why didn't we listen?

  • yea it looks cool

  • Should be implemented in most building. Not because it is green but because it looks cool.

  • sound?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more