...due to dropping sales and with the Neon coming around the corner, what killed the Laser - which was the first DSM with the Eclipse right behind it in that intital, 1988 year..
"If I have read correctly, then the Laser shared the same body platform as a generation of the Mitsubishi Eclipse." ... and we can also add the Eagle Talon. It was a body design set apart from the parent company, Diamond-Star Motors, (DSM) - a joint company owned by Mitsubishi and Chrysler, formed in 1986 - and their first vehicle manufactured at the plant in Normal, Illinois , which makes this a domestically made vehicle with a Japanese built drivetrain.
All 3 models had their own traits, but the Plymouth was the best value for the money; an RS 2.0 non-turbo with automatic sure would go, plus it had the "sleek, quiet" look. It looked better without the spoiler, and it was sad to see it cut. The Eclipse isn't the same car it was; the Talon was "sporty," but it could lose the "body flair" that added to its weight gain that the Plymouth didn't have. Also, it was a roomy car for its size, not to mention it was comfortable and reliable.
You forgot also all three platform mates were assembled by UAW workers. Chrysler later pulled out of DSM and i think the Illinois plant assembling the Laser, Talon, and Eclipse (among other cars). The Normal, Illinois Mitsubishi plant workers (1000/1300 of them) to this day are still represented by the United Auto Workers; the only non-domestic automobile factory in the United States.
Very good commercial. What a way to promote a Plymouth Laser! If I have read correctly, then the Laser shared the same body platform as a generation of the Mitsubishi Eclipse.
...due to dropping sales and with the Neon coming around the corner, what killed the Laser - which was the first DSM with the Eclipse right behind it in that intital, 1988 year..
DSM1G90 1 year ago
"If I have read correctly, then the Laser shared the same body platform as a generation of the Mitsubishi Eclipse." ... and we can also add the Eagle Talon. It was a body design set apart from the parent company, Diamond-Star Motors, (DSM) - a joint company owned by Mitsubishi and Chrysler, formed in 1986 - and their first vehicle manufactured at the plant in Normal, Illinois , which makes this a domestically made vehicle with a Japanese built drivetrain.
DSM1G90 1 year ago
All 3 models had their own traits, but the Plymouth was the best value for the money; an RS 2.0 non-turbo with automatic sure would go, plus it had the "sleek, quiet" look. It looked better without the spoiler, and it was sad to see it cut. The Eclipse isn't the same car it was; the Talon was "sporty," but it could lose the "body flair" that added to its weight gain that the Plymouth didn't have. Also, it was a roomy car for its size, not to mention it was comfortable and reliable.
carwrtr1 1 year ago
@carwrtr1 Drove a '92 Eagle Talon 2.0 16v for ten years. By far the best looking of the trio (however I am baised!).
smithraymond09029 1 year ago
@DSM1G90
You forgot also all three platform mates were assembled by UAW workers. Chrysler later pulled out of DSM and i think the Illinois plant assembling the Laser, Talon, and Eclipse (among other cars). The Normal, Illinois Mitsubishi plant workers (1000/1300 of them) to this day are still represented by the United Auto Workers; the only non-domestic automobile factory in the United States.
BrownBrother27 4 months ago
Very good commercial. What a way to promote a Plymouth Laser! If I have read correctly, then the Laser shared the same body platform as a generation of the Mitsubishi Eclipse.
BrownBrother27 1 year ago