The beginning shot is cropped so that the "plane" doesn't hang in the air partway to the towers as it does in the aaron brown segment you show. Think about it; the CNN fixed always on camera did not manage to get the "plane" coming into the frame.
But the hanging in mid air waiting for the director to say "go" is what I really like!
This is what was shwon at times square; archive cut it out and replaced it with the ABC international shot.
I really like the video of the object hitting the pentagon.. A building that houses a military that spends BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.. but the best security camera they can buy and put on the property is a low quality 2 megapixel or so camera that is worse than even the worst cell phone cameras of the time..
Just noticed that you can't see the plane fly in between the two towers... WOW!! I'm going to search for other videos right now to see if its on them as well!!.. seriously!!
The buildings in the foreground don't even come close to looking real. And the fact that they changed the color of the sky and did such a shitty job fabricating the planes just disgusts me. Actually, I'm more annoyed with the people who still stand by the official story presented by the government after seeing this shit with their own eyes. They're either ignorant, scared to speak their opinion, or just another actor going along with their story. Sickening..
Simon, yours is the most accurate, comprehensive analyses, research & expose of the entire 9-11 hoax, bar none. So glad I found it, I recommend it to everyone I can.
(Your original music soundtracks are the best too!)
I think it would be a good idea to make a movie about 9-11, where someone actually tries to find & interview all the families of the people supposedly killed on that day & everyone who claims to have seen the airplane on that day. Have them testify under oath & sign a sworn statement that they saw what they claimed to have seen, & see if anyone of them have witnesses who would vouch that they were indeed there on that day & sign sworn statements. It would be funny to try to find one person
I understand you guys are trying to do good here, but why would they be willing to kill 3000 people but not willing to crash planes? Why fake the biggest part of your inside job, the part your basing everything off of? Why would there be fake images after impact or explosions and risk exposure when the buildings really were on fire anyway? Why so many stupid risks? This is not sarcasm, these are serious questions I would like answered. .
They reduced risks to a minimum-of course. The entire TV morning broadcasts were pre-fabricated, collapses included. To show the real events would have been a totally unacceptable risk. Also, to kill 3000 bankers/brokers/financial analysts would have entailed unnecessary risks and aggravation. This massive hoax has been pretty much exposed - what is left to uncover now are only peripheral technicalities. :O)
@MrYahoost The real risk is using real planes isn't it? What if the plane only skiffs the building and a wing comes off? Do they call the whole thing off? Do they just set off an explosion? The risky idea is planes. Remember that they had none at the pentagon and shanksville so they fake two and do two for real? Too too monstrous I can barely believe it myself but when you eliminate the impossible whatever is left however improbable has to be the truth
There's a lot of stuff that obviously is unkown about our government, as well as other world governments. I woud suggest that people that have researched other topics, such as the New World Order and the Skull and Bones Society- which is a very interesting "frat" that produces nothing but world leaders and high ranking CIA officers can make more sense to the 9/11 theory because quite frankly, they understand how corrupt this place really is.
@MrYahoost Simply responded, wouldn't it be pretty difficult to hijack 4 planes and fly them to said destinations, while the controllers understand they have been hijacked? At the very least, there would have been some sort of military plane in the air monitoring or attempting to divert the plane. Yet, there was never any word of any NORAD or anyone, except, of course, the fighter(s) that got altered coordinates mid-flight and sent over the ocean.
@MrYahoost - maybe because it is impossible to fly a plane in the manouvers allegedly performed that day...not even remote controlled airplanes are guaranteed to succeed 100%...it had to be a missile...
Amaing work, and when i show it to people they still dont belive what u have show us, Cant understud what logic runs in their heads, if thay even have logic! Thank u for all of ur work!
Anyone watch the Obama deception? Cant say its all true but then again I cant say it isnt worth a watch thats for sure I think alot more bout what is happening since this vid
How about you check Scotland Yard for their current investigation into the illegality of this war. Basically they've said that as well as many other laws - articles 6&7 of the Nuremberg Code are in violation and its illegal to be paying your taxes since 2001. Ignorance is no excuse for the law, so check it out and save that look of shock & being complicit, for when the truth starts to come out. I am amazed at the so many holes in the official story that uneducated or blind slaves just brush off.
why is it nonsense to seek truth? why do you feel the hunt for reality is not worthwhile? When we are all dead, as we will be one day, all that is left is what we did. I think there is nothing more important than a clean and honest legacy to the world. Please do not discourage this effort.
Ahh the refreshing word of wisdom. Tis true, all a man has is his word and his honor. A man's honor outlasts his lifetime. Pity that most people cannot comprehend those thousands of years of knowledge and come newly arrogant into this world, mouthing off and talking back to the wisdom of the ancients. Good to know there are some still out there, like yourself.
Devin Clark's animation sucks as much as the average comment by a planehugger-I know dem planes was real cuz millions of eyewitnesses done seen em on da TV and my uncle's cousin's dogsitter's monkey seen it with his own two eyes from the crown of da statue of liberty and if you say he didn't then you hate america and should move to iraqipakinakistan
You know... showing a guy wacked out of his mind claiming to have been abducted by purple aliens who forced him to square dance does not do anything to disprove the existence of UFOs and aliens. You cannot prove there are no black sheep just by showing a bunch of white sheep. I seriously think the government puts these deliberate wackos out there in an attempt to trick people into associating any questioning the official story with these loons. It is psychology 101.
Ok, so what's next. The Hiroshima nuclear explosion is fake too. Oh, please. Oh, yeah and the Holocaust was fake as well and Pearl Harbor was fake. Sigh.
it is peculiar that when someone shows the media fakery the burden then falls on the the 'exposer of truth' to be responsible for explaining what the murderers did w/ the passengers. one must investigate certain entities in US Govt. it is therein the answer lies (no pun intended). might investigate Israel,also. oh, and the 'live feed' perps might provide ancillary info. to crime
Well, this is an interesting point. It is natural (though by no means just or rational) for the burden to fall on those who doubt the planes story since the doubters are the minority view.
Go play XBox if you can't debate the subject, dweeb. Tell me genius, how would I lose somebody "like this"? I am never ever going to lose a relative in a cartoon accident.
"Xbox playing Dweeb" thats the kind of solid debating I'd expect from a "No Planer". When you reach the mental capacity of a 5 year old I'll look forward to hearing from you, until then you can continue to believe this crap
Let us think together on this a while. Many people believe things we regard as incorrect or implausible. But this does not make any of them unintelligent. Intelligent people can be tricked. It happens all the time. I'm sure you can find examples yourself of this.
So....if there were no planes at all, but the towers blew up.....are you suggesting that the government planted bombs to blow the towers up themselves? Hmm.....something smells fishy here...perhaps it's you, out of your mind, get some help man.
well I for one... know ALL i Mean ALL your work that you have available and find it a fucking honour to say thanks, cheers, rock on to you and hope they make their way into history and give them the justice of hours of skillful editing and solid observational research they deserve- merry christmas and hope the next year is fruitful indeed!!
if you look at the "photoshop" plane you see it flying with the wind...but actually it should be flying almost into the wind. Bad directional fakery. Is the towers photoshoped also to fit the oringal no view of plane?
Who knows, some of them probably were fake. The flight manifests released from the media contradict each other. There is absolutely no bio for some of the said passengers (for sensitivity reasons or the fact that they are fabrications). I'll let you figure out where the rest went; they certainly didn't die in an aircrash, that's for sure.
That is an excellent question. But your question does not answer what is so entirely wrong about the footage that the video examines. It is just a question. Simonshack does not claim to be able to explain everything that happened on 9-11. Such modesty deserves some respect.
I think Simons goal through out all of his videos is not to answer questions but more so to point out the many inconsistantcies involved with 9/11, and thank god for the likes of him, people who sit back and believe whats told to them is the cause of the real problems in this world.... in the words of the great Frederick Douglas "agitate agitate agitate"
Ziplinedown, if you check the MEDIA ARCHIVES for this shot, and do some video editing, you will come to the same overlapping line conclusion simonshack did, and that is, that the video was edited before it was aired on 911. In-turn proving the basis for the entire TV_Fakery argument.
the footage in his video is 100% real, and out of the archives, if you don't believe him go dig in the archives and do your own video edit, you will find that it overlaps the line on the right tower, in the original video, which means one thing, someone edited before the media played it. WHICH IS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF THE TV FAKERY ARGUMENT. i hate ignorant people trying to act all SLICK
i've not herd of this before, its a crazy idea. What did hit it then? or was it a giant bomb on the inside to create the illusion of an impact? also, what about eye whitenesses? I'm pretty sure there are reports of seeing the second plane hit. 9/11 truth is important to me, and this blows my mind. I wouldent say this is the strongest evidence but its kind of mindblowing. Jesus help us.
There has not been one reliable witness so far that was there on the day it happened who has come forward and said they saw a plane, so far all who have come forward were in the pay of the media or authorities. That a bit strange isn't it.
I said 50,000 because the world trade center could hold 50,000 workers. There were far less people on that day but it was a bussy day on a Tuesday morning, so there were thousand still in the buildings. I'm not a dimwit you dumb bitch.
That was very well done and very likely to have occurred and I thank you for that. But...there are too many other amatuer non-broadcast videos clearly showing two planes. The french documentary of the firefighters shows the first one by chance and there's two street level one's I've seen of the second one, not to mention the one from a couple's apartment where the woman is screaming bloody murder after it hits. What about the noise from the jets you hear? The roars. What are those then?
I must assume you did not watch all parts of September Clues. All of the (about 19) shots of the second plane have by now been proven fake. Only two videos of the first plane exist : Pavel Hlava's (super-low quality and from long distance) and the french documentary (the Naudet brothers). The last mentioned will be treated in upcoming part6 of SC. The frenchmen filmed both hits (+wtc7 collapse!) and are totally forged. Stay tuned.
Yep, Great Work, Sometimes I think all of us here fighting for the truth are the tip of the sword.
Another thing,
Do a search on youtube for "There is a million reasons why I don't believe it".
Then tell me how can the book in the video not burn and the same type of plane melted the steel at the towers enough to bring them down? aka pools of molten steel there.
Thanks, Fred! Don't worry, if those people on the Pentagon payroll are as efficient as the video- fakers, all they will achieve is to make some money.
nice work. when people actually look at the footage, they usually find problems. every shot is sus, but most people are scared to look. good clip. cnn showed us a lot of fakes that day.
We once called it the *stucked*-CGI plane, there was some great work from Rosalee on that and i once did some kind of animation loop of similar stucked CGI at 911closeup and 911tvfakeryDOTnet keep it goin' great conceptional debut nico aka ewing2001 livevideoDOTcom ewing2001 + crew
The beginning shot is cropped so that the "plane" doesn't hang in the air partway to the towers as it does in the aaron brown segment you show. Think about it; the CNN fixed always on camera did not manage to get the "plane" coming into the frame.
But the hanging in mid air waiting for the director to say "go" is what I really like!
This is what was shwon at times square; archive cut it out and replaced it with the ABC international shot.
CNN911Fakes 3 months ago
whats the music?
CharlieBorrows 4 months ago
@CharlieBorrows
It's an electronic composition of mine. :-)
simonshack 4 months ago
I really like the video of the object hitting the pentagon.. A building that houses a military that spends BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.. but the best security camera they can buy and put on the property is a low quality 2 megapixel or so camera that is worse than even the worst cell phone cameras of the time..
Kopihucky 7 months ago in playlist My ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH
Just noticed that you can't see the plane fly in between the two towers... WOW!! I'm going to search for other videos right now to see if its on them as well!!.. seriously!!
TheCosmicStarmen 10 months ago
The buildings in the foreground don't even come close to looking real. And the fact that they changed the color of the sky and did such a shitty job fabricating the planes just disgusts me. Actually, I'm more annoyed with the people who still stand by the official story presented by the government after seeing this shit with their own eyes. They're either ignorant, scared to speak their opinion, or just another actor going along with their story. Sickening..
BrutalMind1984 1 year ago 3
THIS IS BOTH NEW AND INTERESTING
soulstoned83 1 year ago 7
Simon, yours is the most accurate, comprehensive analyses, research & expose of the entire 9-11 hoax, bar none. So glad I found it, I recommend it to everyone I can.
(Your original music soundtracks are the best too!)
Thumbup + ;)
JehanneDeLys 1 year ago 16
I think it would be a good idea to make a movie about 9-11, where someone actually tries to find & interview all the families of the people supposedly killed on that day & everyone who claims to have seen the airplane on that day. Have them testify under oath & sign a sworn statement that they saw what they claimed to have seen, & see if anyone of them have witnesses who would vouch that they were indeed there on that day & sign sworn statements. It would be funny to try to find one person
freepeoplenow 1 year ago
Everybody knows they faked it all.. As usual
ParamoreVzla 1 year ago
I understand you guys are trying to do good here, but why would they be willing to kill 3000 people but not willing to crash planes? Why fake the biggest part of your inside job, the part your basing everything off of? Why would there be fake images after impact or explosions and risk exposure when the buildings really were on fire anyway? Why so many stupid risks? This is not sarcasm, these are serious questions I would like answered. .
MrYahoost 2 years ago 9
They reduced risks to a minimum-of course. The entire TV morning broadcasts were pre-fabricated, collapses included. To show the real events would have been a totally unacceptable risk. Also, to kill 3000 bankers/brokers/financial analysts would have entailed unnecessary risks and aggravation. This massive hoax has been pretty much exposed - what is left to uncover now are only peripheral technicalities. :O)
Please go to septembercluesDOTinfo.
Thanks for your good questions!
simonshack 2 years ago 35
@MrYahoost The real risk is using real planes isn't it? What if the plane only skiffs the building and a wing comes off? Do they call the whole thing off? Do they just set off an explosion? The risky idea is planes. Remember that they had none at the pentagon and shanksville so they fake two and do two for real? Too too monstrous I can barely believe it myself but when you eliminate the impossible whatever is left however improbable has to be the truth
keflar5 1 year ago
@MrYahoost
There's a lot of stuff that obviously is unkown about our government, as well as other world governments. I woud suggest that people that have researched other topics, such as the New World Order and the Skull and Bones Society- which is a very interesting "frat" that produces nothing but world leaders and high ranking CIA officers can make more sense to the 9/11 theory because quite frankly, they understand how corrupt this place really is.
cawbird101 1 year ago
@MrYahoost Follow the money ... war business ... Afganistan , Irak , Population control
luismanuel1978 1 year ago
@MrYahoost Simply responded, wouldn't it be pretty difficult to hijack 4 planes and fly them to said destinations, while the controllers understand they have been hijacked? At the very least, there would have been some sort of military plane in the air monitoring or attempting to divert the plane. Yet, there was never any word of any NORAD or anyone, except, of course, the fighter(s) that got altered coordinates mid-flight and sent over the ocean.
THEmattyj162 1 year ago
@MrYahoost - maybe because it is impossible to fly a plane in the manouvers allegedly performed that day...not even remote controlled airplanes are guaranteed to succeed 100%...it had to be a missile...
maelstone 1 year ago
@MrYahoost
You are stupid and big time morron. All of this was made to attack foreign countries, like Iraq and Afganistan.
StraitKillaBuzAmigo 6 months ago
Amaing work, and when i show it to people they still dont belive what u have show us, Cant understud what logic runs in their heads, if thay even have logic! Thank u for all of ur work!
SucicIgor 2 years ago 10
Anyone watch the Obama deception? Cant say its all true but then again I cant say it isnt worth a watch thats for sure I think alot more bout what is happening since this vid
Jhairoh405 2 years ago
@Jhairoh405
People like you give me hope in life :)
WearechangeN 2 years ago
SIMON SHACK FOR PRESIDENT :o)
nookiboi 3 years ago 217
@nookiboi simon shack for the NEW WORLD ORDA!
ninjashaun1337 1 year ago 2
Who is telling you what to believe?
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 5
How about you check Scotland Yard for their current investigation into the illegality of this war. Basically they've said that as well as many other laws - articles 6&7 of the Nuremberg Code are in violation and its illegal to be paying your taxes since 2001. Ignorance is no excuse for the law, so check it out and save that look of shock & being complicit, for when the truth starts to come out. I am amazed at the so many holes in the official story that uneducated or blind slaves just brush off.
Psy0pAgent 3 years ago
why is it nonsense to seek truth? why do you feel the hunt for reality is not worthwhile? When we are all dead, as we will be one day, all that is left is what we did. I think there is nothing more important than a clean and honest legacy to the world. Please do not discourage this effort.
icetech43 4 years ago 15
Ahh the refreshing word of wisdom. Tis true, all a man has is his word and his honor. A man's honor outlasts his lifetime. Pity that most people cannot comprehend those thousands of years of knowledge and come newly arrogant into this world, mouthing off and talking back to the wisdom of the ancients. Good to know there are some still out there, like yourself.
Psy0pAgent 3 years ago 32
Just trying to make sense of it. All I can do is open my eyes and talk about things with people. Peace.
icetech43 3 years ago 9
Devin Clark's animation sucks as much as the average comment by a planehugger-I know dem planes was real cuz millions of eyewitnesses done seen em on da TV and my uncle's cousin's dogsitter's monkey seen it with his own two eyes from the crown of da statue of liberty and if you say he didn't then you hate america and should move to iraqipakinakistan
whoiswhoiskilltown 4 years ago 2
You know... showing a guy wacked out of his mind claiming to have been abducted by purple aliens who forced him to square dance does not do anything to disprove the existence of UFOs and aliens. You cannot prove there are no black sheep just by showing a bunch of white sheep. I seriously think the government puts these deliberate wackos out there in an attempt to trick people into associating any questioning the official story with these loons. It is psychology 101.
Hilary155 4 years ago
So right Hilary155. Using lunatics as cover is the oldest trick in the book. They are called "stooges" for a reason. Keep up the great work Simon.
piasillo 4 years ago 6
Ok, so what's next. The Hiroshima nuclear explosion is fake too. Oh, please. Oh, yeah and the Holocaust was fake as well and Pearl Harbor was fake. Sigh.
shyquietboy7 4 years ago
it is peculiar that when someone shows the media fakery the burden then falls on the the 'exposer of truth' to be responsible for explaining what the murderers did w/ the passengers. one must investigate certain entities in US Govt. it is therein the answer lies (no pun intended). might investigate Israel,also. oh, and the 'live feed' perps might provide ancillary info. to crime
hypnotstcollector 4 years ago 6
Well, this is an interesting point. It is natural (though by no means just or rational) for the burden to fall on those who doubt the planes story since the doubters are the minority view.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago
were are the people? where is the building now???
burningsponge 4 years ago
Go play XBox if you can't debate the subject, dweeb. Tell me genius, how would I lose somebody "like this"? I am never ever going to lose a relative in a cartoon accident.
ImyManz99 4 years ago
"Xbox playing Dweeb" thats the kind of solid debating I'd expect from a "No Planer". When you reach the mental capacity of a 5 year old I'll look forward to hearing from you, until then you can continue to believe this crap
devonscanada 4 years ago
Let us think together on this a while. Many people believe things we regard as incorrect or implausible. But this does not make any of them unintelligent. Intelligent people can be tricked. It happens all the time. I'm sure you can find examples yourself of this.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 7
So....if there were no planes at all, but the towers blew up.....are you suggesting that the government planted bombs to blow the towers up themselves? Hmm.....something smells fishy here...perhaps it's you, out of your mind, get some help man.
UsNbros 4 years ago
faggot it was a plane it was captured at every fucking concievable angle.... go suck ur 8 dics faggot
gangstagirl90210 4 years ago
Shut up gangstertwirp, this subject is way over your head. Go watch some rap videos.
ImyManz99 4 years ago 2
Gosh, I get to post the same remarks again without spamming! I knew there was some good part to getting killed by YT!
aaron brown sure looks like he is on the roof, doesn't he?
He's not. He's in the studio.
aJoeCraine01a 4 years ago 4
great! And LOL on the "green halos" around the lettering. 5*
nameofthepen 4 years ago
well I for one... know ALL i Mean ALL your work that you have available and find it a fucking honour to say thanks, cheers, rock on to you and hope they make their way into history and give them the justice of hours of skillful editing and solid observational research they deserve- merry christmas and hope the next year is fruitful indeed!!
chachalaca777 4 years ago 4
if you look at the "photoshop" plane you see it flying with the wind...but actually it should be flying almost into the wind. Bad directional fakery. Is the towers photoshoped also to fit the oringal no view of plane?
Ackdacka 4 years ago
yes very sloppy
Ackdacka 4 years ago
Unless you can show the plane passing the towers I am not buying it. So the plane just vanished???????
VideoBlots 4 years ago 2
There were no planes. That's the whole point. The 9/11 crash videos are fake.
ImyManz99 4 years ago 6
What happend to all those people who lost there lives, Where they fake to????
TheOtherWinfreyShow 4 years ago
Who knows, some of them probably were fake. The flight manifests released from the media contradict each other. There is absolutely no bio for some of the said passengers (for sensitivity reasons or the fact that they are fabrications). I'll let you figure out where the rest went; they certainly didn't die in an aircrash, that's for sure.
ImyManz99 4 years ago 5
we have the same conclusions.
shuxian03 4 years ago
How do we know as you say"All those people" even existed ?
Show me some obits and flight passenger list will ya.
krokus69 4 years ago 3
That is an excellent question. But your question does not answer what is so entirely wrong about the footage that the video examines. It is just a question. Simonshack does not claim to be able to explain everything that happened on 9-11. Such modesty deserves some respect.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 15
I think Simons goal through out all of his videos is not to answer questions but more so to point out the many inconsistantcies involved with 9/11, and thank god for the likes of him, people who sit back and believe whats told to them is the cause of the real problems in this world.... in the words of the great Frederick Douglas "agitate agitate agitate"
nookiboi 3 years ago 15
Dude, that doesn't make any sense at all.
agentzippo 4 years ago
Ziplinedown, if you check the MEDIA ARCHIVES for this shot, and do some video editing, you will come to the same overlapping line conclusion simonshack did, and that is, that the video was edited before it was aired on 911. In-turn proving the basis for the entire TV_Fakery argument.
sicfukc 4 years ago 3
the footage in his video is 100% real, and out of the archives, if you don't believe him go dig in the archives and do your own video edit, you will find that it overlaps the line on the right tower, in the original video, which means one thing, someone edited before the media played it. WHICH IS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF THE TV FAKERY ARGUMENT. i hate ignorant people trying to act all SLICK
sicfukc 4 years ago 3
nice vid....the media is evil..
photofu 4 years ago 3
I don't get it.
analyzingfunny 4 years ago
nice work simon
dfwtexxas 4 years ago
hmmm.... o.O
rspicto 4 years ago
i've not herd of this before, its a crazy idea. What did hit it then? or was it a giant bomb on the inside to create the illusion of an impact? also, what about eye whitenesses? I'm pretty sure there are reports of seeing the second plane hit. 9/11 truth is important to me, and this blows my mind. I wouldent say this is the strongest evidence but its kind of mindblowing. Jesus help us.
Lukejcarter 4 years ago
There has not been one reliable witness so far that was there on the day it happened who has come forward and said they saw a plane, so far all who have come forward were in the pay of the media or authorities. That a bit strange isn't it.
Humdingermusic 4 years ago 4
Very very intriguing.
PS
Rick Siegel is a psychotic goat.
Natashathompson 4 years ago
omg. i should just be a sheep like you and everything would be better. just cos you laid down for the new hitler doesn't mean i will.
genghis6199 4 years ago
50,000 ?. nice research dimwit
genghis6199 4 years ago
I said 50,000 because the world trade center could hold 50,000 workers. There were far less people on that day but it was a bussy day on a Tuesday morning, so there were thousand still in the buildings. I'm not a dimwit you dumb bitch.
38G1X 4 years ago
Any one want to confirm 50,000???!!!!
SeppLainer 4 years ago
so... the amateur videos of the second plane from NJ and Manhattan from the street...those are photoshopped too? Come on. Nice try.
rmamolite 4 years ago
I warmly recommend you all to watch 'September Clues' (part1/6)on Livevideo com.
simonshack 4 years ago
That was very well done and very likely to have occurred and I thank you for that. But...there are too many other amatuer non-broadcast videos clearly showing two planes. The french documentary of the firefighters shows the first one by chance and there's two street level one's I've seen of the second one, not to mention the one from a couple's apartment where the woman is screaming bloody murder after it hits. What about the noise from the jets you hear? The roars. What are those then?
rmamolite 4 years ago
I must assume you did not watch all parts of September Clues. All of the (about 19) shots of the second plane have by now been proven fake. Only two videos of the first plane exist : Pavel Hlava's (super-low quality and from long distance) and the french documentary (the Naudet brothers). The last mentioned will be treated in upcoming part6 of SC. The frenchmen filmed both hits (+wtc7 collapse!) and are totally forged. Stay tuned.
simonshack 4 years ago
I did watch the other ones but only after I replied. I didn't realize there were more. I am further intrigued. My gut is sickened even more.
rmamolite 4 years ago 4
My apologies to your stomach.
simonshack 4 years ago
Go to live video and serach for 9/11:Evan Fairbanks. Tell me what you think of that.
rmamolite 4 years ago
it flew behind the first tower and hit the second 1 smart one
sk8punk18 4 years ago
Yep, Great Work, Sometimes I think all of us here fighting for the truth are the tip of the sword.
Another thing,
Do a search on youtube for "There is a million reasons why I don't believe it".
Then tell me how can the book in the video not burn and the same type of plane melted the steel at the towers enough to bring them down? aka pools of molten steel there.
awardwinningartist 4 years ago
Thanks, Fred! Don't worry, if those people on the Pentagon payroll are as efficient as the video- fakers, all they will achieve is to make some money.
simonshack 4 years ago
nice work. when people actually look at the footage, they usually find problems. every shot is sus, but most people are scared to look. good clip. cnn showed us a lot of fakes that day.
genghis6199 4 years ago
great job! good to see some new skills around.
We once called it the *stucked*-CGI plane, there was some great work from Rosalee on that and i once did some kind of animation loop of similar stucked CGI at 911closeup and 911tvfakeryDOTnet keep it goin' great conceptional debut nico aka ewing2001 livevideoDOTcom ewing2001 + crew
ewing2001 4 years ago