IMO, all the comments and views expressed here only confirm one thing, that being that Dusty and Judith were and in Judiths case still is two of the finest if not the best Female singers the world has ever seen Every thing said about them are understatements.
l love the seekers and Judith is seriously in a class of her own but no offence to anyone, i think the Springfields own this one, Dusty to me is WELL simply the best
Had always loved the Springfields vesion BUT! What can I say? As an Aussie, this is the first time I have heard the Seekers doing this and I reckon it beats the Springfields version hands down!
Dusty Springfield was a really fine singer also; but on this particular comparison, I prefer The Seekers version. Judy Durham's voice in this track is absolutely tremendous. The musical arrangement here is top notch as well.
BONZA!
brazil10able 2 months ago
just beautiful
SuperJanerey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A Jamieson Smile: Judith's "Pop-Folk sound" of a lover in love. "Please carry me with you." Please Refer to "The Olive Tree".
All for Wedded bliss,
Jamieson
hedwegg 4 months ago 3
Comment removed
hedwegg 4 months ago
IMO, all the comments and views expressed here only confirm one thing, that being that Dusty and Judith were and in Judiths case still is two of the finest if not the best Female singers the world has ever seen Every thing said about them are understatements.
dw69ful 6 months ago
Judith is a lady with a Supreme Voice just Beautifulll ,,love all her Song
CURNY11 7 months ago
I love both versions on this song. The Seekers and Springfields, what talents they are.
brrynefin1946 8 months ago
l love the seekers and Judith is seriously in a class of her own but no offence to anyone, i think the Springfields own this one, Dusty to me is WELL simply the best
manaiaz2 9 months ago
@manaiaz2 yes and they are practically related via Tom :-) what a wonderful songwriter
SaskiaCornell 3 months ago
Awesome voice.I was four years old and my parents took me with them to see The Seekers. Yet I remember it clear as day,46 years later!
Sladedestiny 1 year ago
fantastic
1951smiler 1 year ago
Had always loved the Springfields vesion BUT! What can I say? As an Aussie, this is the first time I have heard the Seekers doing this and I reckon it beats the Springfields version hands down!
d57z12 1 year ago 3
Its a beautiful version, Judith's singing is faultless
icespeckledhen 1 year ago 3
what an incredibly pure voice...
mark22160 1 year ago 4
Dusty Springfield was a really fine singer also; but on this particular comparison, I prefer The Seekers version. Judy Durham's voice in this track is absolutely tremendous. The musical arrangement here is top notch as well.
Wobdifurousness 1 year ago 8
@Wobdifurousness It is indeed ...where is all that gone now?? Dumbing down?
Lisnageeragh 1 year ago
This song is the badger's tadgers
MrMeupmearse 1 year ago
@MrMeupmearse ....Is that the same thing as the Bees Knees?
(lol)
steppen10 1 year ago
@steppen10 More like the Duck's guts.....
Breatherable 1 year ago
♪♥ ♫ Lovely. I almost can't choose between The Seekers and The Springfields versions. Both Judith Durham and Dusty are AWESOME. ♥♫♥
davidmayne 1 year ago 6