Einstein GEMM 14--Warp Speed

[ORBuddha]

What happens if you are traveling at the speed of light and cut your headlights on?

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

induce

[d9d192]

He comes with peace...

[reddog68u]

what about photon energy... its possable

[damygeebo]

Raccoon Willie has achieved warp speed twice... we are going to attempt Warp 2 in July.

I'll keep you posted.

[UnabridgedHero]

@damygeebo How did it go?

[damygeebo]

@UnabridgedHero ...well, after after losing almost all the fur on his hind quarters and tail, and about a half inch of foreskin, we have decided to cancel testing until Willie gets his pride back.

[dmix09]

if our ships can do warp speed, what do you suggest can be done about g-forces? do you think they would have some sort of anti-inertial capabilities?

[aeinstein1904]

First you may be thinking about acceleration and high g-forces. That is a power question and not inherently linked to GEMM or warp speed (you coulg get going that fast by accelerating slowly over a long time.) Implied in the question however is a more interesting question of stopping g-forces in any direction by providing a 'GEMM Barrier."

Possible.

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@aeinstein1904 Hi,if im right, mass could be gained by the HIggs field but only at increased velocity creating an E2 effect where the mass in the field is being created and directed back towards the matter or electrons in question,ie,lower electron orbits and a higher electrostatic effect, or mass.One would need to reduce the mass or maintain or create a higher electron orbit. If you could direct energy or the mass back into the field,you would create or generate an external gravitational effect

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@aeinstein1904 the hypothetical theory could explain the c constant mechanism, where light doesn't travel in packets or photons etc, but is but a state of frequency in the field and propagates through the boson field which is really energy but in a none vibrating state until it receives a vibration from matter etc. This would explain how energy propagation occurs, light or energy is everywhere, it just needs switching on, if you get me, like a pool ball passing energy over to th next etc

[gtarrant2]

Match the "power" consumption of the plancks that make up the mass that you want to move allowing for free movement at ANY speed. The bindings of gravity are the combined efforts of multiple black holes at the -31 magnitude. To escape those efforts which consume matter and energy (decay) you have to isiolate them within a field then charge the field to repel or negate the plancks surrounding the field then propel the field as if it were a bullet in a rail gun like an EM pulse.

[aeinstein1904]

Could be.  Nice theory.

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@aeinstein1904 energy from the field could be used by using external coatings of YBCO superconductors, where space conditions would enduce the desired effect? this would allow matter to maintain increased velocity and maybe redirect this energy/mass back into the surrounding field, enducing a E2 X v/c increase in external gravity, creating a slip stream or gravity warp, where perpetual velocity increases are created, once you pass light speed infinate or quantum external time frames and speeds..

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@aeinstein1904 Cont...could be possble....the inner time frame of the ship would maintain earth relative time, the surface of the ship whould enduce a far faster time rate due to the negative mass on the YBCO and space time around the craft or gravity warp would slow down time and around that time frame, you would have normal space time. Some rockets to create velocity to enduce the mass squared effect may be needed. Space would be used against itself to propel you through it at multiples of c ?

[SASNIGHTCRAWLER]

@aeinstein1904 If this right, it could explain how virtual particles are seen without mass etc, they are the electrons vibration passing through the field and show up as ghost particles or energy, nothing more really. It could also explain why gravity can only travel at c, as gravity may be nothing but energy effects passing through the field also. We can only detect a thing with energy or frequency, it makes one wonder why every particle or chunk of matter creates an energy signature. Thanks

[catcusgreen]

Einstian physics as you put it... does not exesist. It is a model.

Plus if you ever look into his math. you'll find out he was a fraud and most of his work was done on these lines by his x-wife. Who should be a creadited for E=MC2.

These Physics if you can call them that are a model and do not fit the subatomic spartical scale. Thus they are wrong. You can use them only as a "reflection" view of what should happen. They are not fact. It is not proven about the speed of light warping time.

[aeinstein1904]

Yes, Einstein admitted being poor at math, and his ex-wife and others helped him greatly.

I agree that at this point only quantum mechanics has a handle on some of the truth of the stuff of the universe.

[phiAndpi]

That's just a myth that Einstein was crap at Maths. & while we're talking about sums forget the Etchasketch drawings & send your sums off to Nature.

[aeinstein1904]

No, really, read his biographies, and his own words. He used the help of others to complete the major quantum equations, which all bear a hyphenated name for the co-author. And I'd love for a math whizzard to work out these sums.

[stoped2]

no you don't mate, your not blocking me witout a reply. your talking utter fucking Bollocks, Einstein's professor called him a laze dog, & he did use a human computer just as we use modern calculator but he would have wiped the floor with most people both then & now at Maths. Also I suggest you go read some books on the history of quantum mechanics because no one person worked it out.

Phi

[supressorgrid]

The pressure in an air tank is caused by particles moving at high speed hitting the tank walls. The more particles,the higher the speed/pressure.We must increase gravity,space or time in order to move faster than set limits.You gotta have a black hole to provide therightconditions.

[aeinstein1904]

Another way to look at that is that you must increase the total energy in the system. Black holes have a lot of mass/energy, but there should be other ways to get there.

[jamiehasnomercy]

i get what your saying its a very good idea, i would just like to know how you recon we could go about splitting light in two like a bubble in order to tavel through it now thats the tough question?

[aeinstein1904]

How to split the GEMM might be as simple as a well designed nosecone on a rocket. We need more experiments at faster speeds to see what might work.

[bandpractice]

How would we seperate the planks? If we had enough power could we do it without seperating the planks? Einstein postulated that it would take an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light. Without seperating these planks, is that true?

[oopsurdead]

einstien said it takes 2 tons of fuel per every 1 ton of transported to reach light speed but thats impossible. because per every 1 ton of "stuff" u need 2 tons of fuel and thats 3 tons of "stuff" so it will never be reached. unless we create of find a type of fuel that weights less and adds very little weight.

[aeinstein1904]

No, there is a classic math problem like that, from the ancient greek:Zeno of Elea, a pupil of Parmenides. Always adding to itself is not intended in the original formula.

[BRAINONBOARD]

Sorry. I cant find a playlist (wich its executig it selfe) and your ancwer hasen't helped me out so fare too. (I already know about that problem. The Train model is a well known way to make exactlly this problem clear in connection with the relativity-theory.)

[BRAINONBOARD]

Sorry haven't found your footnot. Maby it's footnot 7? Prhaps you could bind it in your explanation.Would it be possible that you would make a playlist of all your clips? Else I go crazy with clicking and searching. Thanks!

[aeinstein1904]

Sure, the playlist as of today is GEMM 1-30 and GEMM Footnote 1-9. (Elect 1 c is currently missing).

Remember that the fundamental 'problem' is that light appears to have the same speed, c, no matter how fast you travel relative to the source. Relativity and GEMM Theory are just 2 different ways to explain that phenomenon.

[BRAINONBOARD]

I want an ancwer wich fits for every point of view. Ore for some trains of the model. At wich train ""stands"" your aether? (Now I go and see after your footnotes...)

[BRAINONBOARD]

Ore to put it in a other way: If you put twenty trains on each other and all of them driving in the same direction with the speed of 0.5*lightspeed you can still only mesure lightspeed if you look from a point wich is on the staing earth. Could you explain this with GEMM? Why do you need it? Were is it to put in the model?

[aeinstein1904]

Sorry, I don't think I understand the questions.

GEMM is one way to explain why you see an absolute speed of light, whether the source is moving or not relative to you. (See the footnotes about a moving light v. a stationary light while traveling c/2.)

Thanks!

[BRAINONBOARD]

If you send a Lightsignal in and against the direction of the earth you will mesure no diference in the speed if you mesure it from the Erth. But if you go to the moon and mesure from there you will find the differnce. Because you have to different point of views in wich you can leave out a eather. It is leafed out. Simply because it's the simplist way of a model.

[plokijij7856]

It's the second drawing! Einstein!

[shreddTlife]

okay so we are able to do warp speed?

then why don't we?

is it because we don't have a large enough power source, or just because it would cost too much money?

thanx

[aeinstein1904]

Neither. You can fly (hang glider, etc.) without big power, once you know how to use Bernouille's Principle.

The 'power' comes from understanding, air for airplanes, GEMM for warp speed.

[aeinstein1904]

One more addition: someday we could presumable focus enough energy to break through the light speed barrier. I also believe there will be a more elegant method as well, not just more sheer energy.

[madant82]

Sounds Plausible

[aeinstein1904]

Thanks. Brian Greene's latest take on string theory is starting to look like GEMM theory.