Re: Short Message to TheAmazingAtheist and The Expert

[mandy26lez]

Great orators run the world my friend! Also F.Y.I when you post a video rebuttal you should probably write down what you are going to say first that way you don't run on about nothing like you did this video. That way maybe he will take your video rebuttal seriously. Just a nickles worth of free advice.

[Amaguqas]

I guess calling yourself HowTheWorldWorks could come across as arrogant ,but so is calling yourself "amazing"

[Amaguqas]

If HTWW is "captain stares alot" then TheAmazingAtheist is Lord shouts a lot.

You of all people should be careful when judging people on their presentation.

[Darkeklaw]

Wait he's Arrogant but The Amazing Atheist name calls? I think The Amazing Atheist is more arrogant than HTWW guy.

[buffnshine]

why are you talking?

[caveman73]

@buffnshine Because I fucking can. Why are you listening?

[Ben1987X]

@caveman73 Hey remember me? We both were locked in county jail! You know when we joined the aryan brotherhood?

[caveman73]

@Ben1987X Must have me mistaken for someone else.

[Beelzebird]

sorry, I know it's off topic, but the tats are freaking amazing!

[caveman73]

Thanx man

[LiberalofLiberty]

You don't realise it caveman73, but you indirectly stated that truth (Whether a statement is true or false) is determined by the following criteria:

- The arguers emotions

- The Arguers presentation (funny or boring)

- The orientation of the arguers pupils relative to the camera

- the humility of the arguer

[caveman73]

And your fucking point is?

[LiberalofLiberty]

Let me put it into different terms.

The fact that you added the word fucking was in that sentence above was abrasive, and proves quite clearly that anything you say thereafter is wrong. :)

[caveman73]

Wow! What splended logic. "The fact that you added the word fucking was in that sentence above was abrasive, and proves quite clearly that anything you say thereafter is wrong. :)"

Your sentence structure could use some work, KID. Better hit the books in summer school.

Those that live in glass houses should not throw stones.

[LiberalofLiberty]

You don't get the point; so let's try this without any sarcasm.

Your criticisms implied that truth value is determined by technique, how a person presents an argument. It implies that truth is not derived from facts and logic but from cosmetics.

My comment on how you used the word 'fucking' is just my way of pointing out the illogical nature of your criticisms. You seemed to notice it immediately when I did it, but didn't notice how illogical it was when YOU did it.

[caveman73]

I imply nothing.. Debate does not make the winner right. You may win an argument but still be wrong on the overall facts.

Listen "Spock", I use the word fuck for many reasons the easiest to explain is.. I'm a sailor and I cuss like one.

[LiberalofLiberty]

then suppose winning an argument based upon a criteria of cosmetics makes Thunderf00t the rightful 'winner' of this debate... All the while every fact and assertion made in the debate was patently proven wrong by ShaneDk.

[PANTERA619]

@LiberalofLiberty thats a stupid statement. A duckling is yellow, true. A fucking duckling is yellow. true, A swear word does not make the following words false, for instance, your a fucking idiot

[caveman73]

Thank you PANTERA619... What is up with kid Liberty?

[PANTERA619]

@caveman73 I dunno, just thought Id knock him off his high horse, sick tats btw

[caveman73]

HEHEHE! Well thank you for the back up and the comp on the ink.

[WallyAnti]

I feel the same way about HTWW videos. His delivery is very abrasive and just not persuasive at all. He does argue well and it's apparent that he has plenty of debate experience, but it has reduced him to something like a conservative robot. I see very little sincere emotion. It's as if he just regurgitates facts that he has either memorized or prepared on note cards. I think he is also slightly OCD as he edits out his blinks.

[Darkeklaw]

@WallyAnti I don't think HTWW is trying to "Win" over supporters. When you debunk something you don't worry about charisma. You worry about point out the fallacies. That's what he does. He then gets attacked and called names. Which does nothing to disprove his debunkings. And as stated previous... HTWW hasn't resorted to name calling...

[rtcordero]

d.i. after boot camp to not look him in the eye? im just curious. Im just making an observation now and you can take this for your own benefit. You appear slightly insecure, is this true? A tactic to a strong debate is very little body movement, especially in the face. This is because the person your debating is looking at your face. You dont want the person your debating to see any body language that indicates your possibly nervous or dont know what youre talking about.

[caveman73]

There is a difference between looking someone in the eye when you speak with them and staring. Yes you look at someone when you speak with them but you don't stare.

Oh I am not prior military, I'm active duty Navy.

Insecure? To a degree.. Yes. I am not that comfortable on the camera as of yet. I am working on it.

[WallyAnti]

@rtcordero

Body movement is only a problem if you don't know what you are talking about or are actually nervous. If you have no reason for either of these qualities you shouldn't have to feign paralysis.

[caveman73]

Good comment.

[rtcordero]

looking someone in the eye is a sign of respect. Just a question, in the military do you think it would be slightly annoying to say a

[rtcordero]

This is simply a response to this video. I noticed that you said that his stare is slightly annoying. You being prior military, I would think that