Added: 2 years ago
From: michaeljackson
Views: 389,317
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,146)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ultimately, the Beatles are better

    But MJ is still great

  • The thing I like about the Beatles-version, is the relaxing groovy sound (the voice of John, the bass etc) and here it's all just to much or to hard, especially the drums and the guitar. Sorry, but I stick with the Beatles.

  • HA!!! EVERYONE I KNOW INCLUDING MY PARENTS AND BRO SAYS "NO NO NO, COME TOGETHER IS A BEATLES SONG, MICHAEL JACKSON NEVER SUNG IT!!!!"

    F*****G PROVED THEM WRONG!!!!! :) )>!!!MOPHEAD541!!!<(

  • i prefer this to the beetles version, the beetles version was too slow and thin

  • ok he may be amazing, but not better than the Beatles

  • is this statue real, and where is it by the way? x

  • @bestofjoy they were put up temporarily all over the world for the history tour

  • @redjokeraslan oh thanks wer was it

  • @bestofjoy i think its just one of the statues with a background superimposed behind it

  • I miss u, majkl !

  • I miss u, majkl !

  • sooo much better than the beatles version!!

  • he made this song his own so dont judge it if u dont like it dont listen 2 it

  • this is my fav song of mj:)

  • He killed this song... So God killed him :D

  • @JoshySpectrum and i kill you

    xD

  • @JoshySpectrum  thats not funny....

  • Best cover of the Beatles song! More omph and urban jangle than The Beatles (but the Beatles are still the most awesome band in history, bar none!)

  • beatles is better!!!!!

  • its alright but i like the beatles version better.

    you guys just like him better because its michael jackson(not that i dont like mj)

  • the begin of the 2min51 is the best part of this sing

  • Man! LENNON & McCartney really could write some good tunes, just litsen to these lyrics!! thats why MJ had to buy The Beatles cataloge [good invesment on MJ's part]

  • Michael was the best artist, dancer, singer-songwriter and philanthropist in the world ever.

  • @mjthebest7294 i agree with most of them... but not songwriter..

  • @caninedog oh... why?

  • @caninedog

    I agree with you :)

  • @DaeGW yeah but you forget that elvis and the beatles both released dozens of albums and singles. michael released 9-10 solo albums, although the first 3 were not his work just motown making him sing songs so they dont really count, so lets call it 7 albums and about 20 singles of SOLO work. and they have sales of at least 500,000,000. added with his motown + jackson 5 stuff that goes to 750,000,000.he sold damn close to what beatles and elvis did with 1/4 of the material released....

  • @feelingthis1989 his sales figures are un-rivaled. if piracy wasnt so prevalent and music sales had continued at the rate they would have had piracy not destroyed the music industry he would have overtaken the beatl;es and elviz within a decade or two. elvis and beatles musics peaked a long time ago... Mike had everything. he didnt just revolutionise a particular musical genre he re-invented the entire music industry. from pop videos to marketing to image. to music itself. to stage performance.

  • @feelingthis1989 ...and finally, i never said the beatles were talentless. i acknowledge their abilities. they were a great band. but they were not the greatest. the lacked several qualities that prevent them from being called the greatest. they were just in the right place at the right time with the right commercial engine behind them. hyping them up in a big big way and it annoys me when they get called greatest and legends whent here are so many bands that deserve it more. Queen for example.

  • sorry the beatles verson is waaaaaaay better !! u cant beat them ! :)

  • @feelingthis1989 Your comparison is totally wrong. The last beatles' song is from 1970, last michael's is form 2010! You'll be right if in 2050 there will be michael's songs on radio! i LIke Michael, but 2 or 3 beatles' song ARE timeless...who does not know Yesterday? i think michael is one of the greatest singers, but i'm SURE beatles are, and time gives it proove

    (sorry for my mistakes i'm italian)

  • @maxpezzali94 Ofcourse Michael is timeless people still listen to songs from the 70s dude. The beatles had there time they were good. But i'm sorry but you just can't deny that Michael is a legend and was better then the beatles. oh and by the way i don't know the song Yesterday ;)

  • Shouldn't he sing "he shoot Pepsi Cola"?

  • He's no John Lennon, but this version is OK, the instrumental parts suck, but the voice is cool

  • WOAH! CHEESY 80s VERSION!!

  • but it is still all of the beatles...

  • Michael Jackson AND The beatles where very close friends thats why he wanted to schange the beat a Little bit you can hear Paul mcartney in the back ground singing with him Partly

  • beatles are good song writers but they cannot sing very well. mj can sing and has a great vocal range. great song writing + great voice = killer song

  • @feelingthis1989 You fucking serious? The Beatles can't sing...?

  • @JoeKEPRODUCTIONS no they're average instrument players. and they are decent song writers. they just get a lot of credit because they are hugely influential. but sometimes people mistake influence for skill. beatles were over rated thats why no one really listens to them anymore and none of their songs is ever on the radio. their music isn't timeless. but michael jackson, prince, and u2 are timelss. beatles just legends for kickstarting a music revoloution. they are not great musicians.

  • @feelingthis1989 ...sometimes people forget this which is sad as there are so many bands and artists who are far better than the beatles but dont get the credit. its a shame really.

  • Comment removed

  • les Beatles c'est vraiment mou!

  • @mjiloveyouful C'est pas la même époque; on va dire  ^_^

  • je prefere la version de M.J , plus rock , et surtout quand on voit le clip super sexy , il etait le plus sexy quand il dansait !

  • This version SMASHES the original.

  • Thumb up if u miss Michael Jackson

  • @iR3R41N,That will be the whole world then :)

  • Love this song

  • i like this version, the Beatles version is way better!

  • Anthonyboga, this song is not by The Beatles, is by John Lennon...

    In this song Michael's voice is better than John's voice but not in another songs.

  • @txell025 it is by the beatles it's from their album abbey road actually

  • This is it..

  • Uh. I love <3.

    But I also love the Beatles version :').

  • this version is good.. but the beatles are too good... MJ is nothing compared to them

  • @iS1l3Nc3u Mj is better then the beatles since he was in the jackson 5 lol

  • @iS1l3Nc3u i completely agree :) i love MJ a lot but really no one can do the Beatles songs better than the Beatles >< :D

  • Comment removed

  • I think this version rocks XD ^u^

  • Michael definitely gave this song the thing it needed!

  • anyone who prefers this version is mentally retarded

  • @ThisIsCremeBrulee your mentally retarded by saying that

  • THISS ISS MICHAELL

  • This version is so much better!!!

    all pop without the psycodelic sound effects and without John Lennons adorable voice...this pedophile DEFINITELY sings it better ¬¬"!

    ROCK N ROLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @CMGBWCJBColdplay

    MJ was acquitted of all molestation charges and proved innocent. Stop this IGNORANCE!

  • michael jackson is the only one who could do a cover of this song that could be accepted. thats just how awesome he is. and john lennon is an absolute legend. shame they never did a duet of the song together

  • lets get this straight NO ONE CAN TOP THE BEATLES ON A BEATLES SONG this is a good cover but John Lennon will always be the best at singing come together... but Michael Jackson comes in at second i suppose lol

  • @TheKangadoodoo Indeed, I'm not a big fan of this version. I prefer Lennon's voice and that slow style. this song sounds a bit weird. Mj is the ebst singer though

  • MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE BEST FOREVER!!!

    WE LOVE YOU & WE MISS YOU MIKE

  • amazing!!!!xxxxxxxxxx

    ii lovee youu kingg jacksonn !!xoxoxoxoxoxox,,<3

  • Michael Jackson sings this song extremely well even better than the beatles even.. :)

  • Dont like it, I love Micheal but this is far too cheesy. Why did Jacko hate the Beatles?

  • @JacktheDragon10  It's not jacko its jackson

  • @JacktheDragon10 michael didn't hate the beatles. paul and him were very good friends, but one day paul told michael about purchasing music rights (you know, when a radio station plays that song you get money for it). so michael baught the beatles' rights, which paul wanted too. and paul didn't like that at all, which ended up in a broken friendship

  • @EldinSjinzo I think no matter how much money I had I don't think I could ever purchase the rights to such classic hits. Especially under the nose of one of the guys that wrote them. But thats just my veiwpoint.

  • @JacktheDragon10 michael paid almost 60 million for those rights. and i too, find it weird that he could actually buy those rights, since the beatles were still living

  • @EldinSjinzo Michael had lost a friend through them rights though...Him and Paul McCartney fell out!

  • if michael was in the beatles well they would be the 8th wonder of the world

  • fantastic song, only with he had recorded more of there stuff , before his amazing light was put out to early. rip.

  • ♥!! 

  • The best cover of "Come together"

  • 32 people who won't come together!!

  • Comment removed

  • he's got some of the best vocal ever in this song thumbs up if you agree

  • i prefer Michael's voice compared to the voice of Beetles

  • @anthonyboga Beatles* -_-

  • @anthonyboga really? Beetles? band that big you didn't know it was the BEATLES??

  • @anthonyboga Beatles*

  • @anthonyboga Yeah! MJ is better by far!

  • @anthonyboga That's because you're a fag. Beatles' version is much better.

  • @HetfieldHammetUlrich fuck off

  • @anthonyboga i'm sorry for you little bitch. Someday you'll have some cultur

  • @HetfieldHammetUlrich Luckily for you I've never met in real life because otherwise I'll have you buried room fag.

  • @anthonyboga i think that you are a pussy, because you like a lot Micheal Jackson and his music is listenned by a lot of fag. I don't think that you can scared me little kitty.

  • @HetfieldHammetUlrich 1) You say that because you did not see me in the face.

    2) DOJ is not heard by fags, and finally to hand if you listen apparently you were listening puique're gone from this page.

  • @HetfieldHammetUlrich hallo how are u doing i hope fine. maybe we could catch up 1 time u know eat something watch a movie. after that i have to fucking kill u

  • @Mrrolio3 i'm so fucking frightened you're a little pop-music listenner and i'm a metalhead. I think that you're obviously a very scary guy because it's a fact pop-fags are fucking badass.

  • @HetfieldHammetUlrich its not that i am a pop fan or something i just like the song.

    if u are a metalhead why do u listen to this

  • @anthonyboga You can't prefer him, the Beatles fucking destroy this pedo. This version is crap.

  • @JoeKEPRODUCTIONS I respect the Beatles but I like Michael Jackson and I'm a fan of him.

  • @anthonyboga ...Beatles... me either

  • cant falt any song

  • Michaels a nonce

  • Michael Jackson Put the Fuckler's OUT OF THE SPOT LIGHT!

  • LOVE IT

  • I <3 The Beatles and MJ.

  • this song is for dance very sexy dont belive?

  • Nice version. Of course better of Aerosmith's one.

  • m encanta esta cancion

    

  • Like this cover, but heck, The Beatles are much better.

  • @aaaabigail I agree that the beatles are amazing. but for this particular song, I'd have to give it to Jacko

  • I prefer this one, In the Music Video for this MJ was so hyped up and energetic even dancing with a fan at one point, tearing off his shirt :D Hes the BEST!!!

    But in The Beatles one John Lennon just sat in a chair with a guitar singing, thats boring. Good singing but boring performance..........

    LONG LIVE THE KING :D!!!

  • love this version :)

  • Rocker MJ

  • man this is way better than the beatles version... the beat of the song is awesome he knows how to make songs

  • @Joke267

    your username says what i think of your comment

  • @superdan1875 Oo... ?? the true is that this song is 100% better than the beatles version... the beatles version is too slow and quiet... now michaels' version is awesome the beat is much strong and his vocal is fucking great... now about the username i guess that ur username is the joke superdan?... what? superman relative?

  • @Joke267

    While I do love the MJ version, The Beatles version is alot better seen as they actually wrote it, as well as defining the 60's with it, expressing their lyrical genius and practically kickstarted 'prog rock' along with another song in the album...And all MJ did was sing it! (But he did rather well though!)

  • Comment removed

  • @MrAndrewjs yeah man totally agree both version are exellent i liked more the mj version cuz the beat and the strength of his voice... but beattles version like u said defined the 60' with his music, thats why both, the band and the artist are legends :)

  • Comment removed

  • so a sexy music video he is hott

  • I like more with the beatles

  • @TheNightDriverX mother fucker you suck

  • I prefer this version!!!! lol

  • @skyadventure47 i know same here!

  • MJ is extremely good at this, but personally, i prefer the beatles version, but this is still amazing :) and if anyone is going to start criticizing me, like "then why the hell did u come to this page anyway if u like the beatles version better" its because i have never heard this version before

  • Giggetty  !

  • still the greatest

  • great song love his music great man rip

  • Awesome cover!

    R.I.P From England.

    [CONOR]

  • Forget micheal's personal life, he was a music genius

  • 28 people need to fix their mouse!

  • We love you michael jackson ..

    king now and forever !

  • Would ya look at that; 28 haters had the nerve to come to this page and click the wrong button.. mm-mm smh.

  • Stolen!

  • @daviddeath11 like your mom's ugly face :)

  • @thecooljazz and your dads crusty anal wartz

  • Michael sounds like he's horse or some on here, BUT it's still SEXY and I LOVE IT!!

  • MJ is so sexy hot and talented:) We miss him!

  • dis is my jam

  • Michael Sings This Song Better Than Anyone Else *-*

  • R.I.P. Michael Jackson

  • To be honest I will always love the original just a bit more...

    But I do love Michael Jackson and his version too!

  • Sorry Michael but the Beatles did it for me better , more smoother when i heard it on "A bronx Tale"

  • Remember, Michael owned the right to this song and the rest of the Beatles catalogue so could prtactically o what the hell he liked with their songs lol. This is amazing though.

  • i just love mj. nobody nos how much i love him.screw ppl ho h8 him

  • @ilovemj467 Alot of people love him, alot hate him. Either way, not everyone on this Earth will like him. I learned that a long time ago. And it's wrong to basically say f*** everyone who doesn't. Ive loved this guy since i was about 7 and have heard alot of crap being said about him but never believed ne of it. Ive studied his work and have seen how good of a soul he is. So for you to say nobody knows how much you luv him, please don't make me laugh

  • I love this version only.

  • @puiandfung I know, huh?

  • @puiandfung this version sucks

  • lol dang Michael... Just.. a orgasm of good music.. Speechless.

  • MJ pulls this off. Paul was on Letterman after MJs death and said that he was a very nice man. So leave it alone if you don't like this version then youtube the beatles version really don't understand why this is such an issue for some people.

  • This version is 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,00­0,000 times better than the orginal, John Lennon rocks but Michael Jackson is the King!

  • I love john lennon, but this version is better than the original!!

  • @MrBenbucher Look in the mirror. You'll find one. MJ wasn't a dumb rapist. He still was a black man, not a 'nigger.' That's an insulting term. And I bet he was much smarter than you are. He wrote most of his songs himself. So SHUT THE FUCK UP

  • this version is beat the original

  • i think the only reaon people diliked this is because this song killed michael ....

  • @TheAlexCarrington ? how did this song KILLE michael

    no being a jerk, but could you explain what you mean?

  • @KabrieaRobinsonSD im going to personal message you because its gonna be a long mesage that will not fit here :P

  • @TheAlexCarrington no ppl disliked him because he was such a good person and send me a personal message to ur theory sounds dumb

  • fuck the 27 haters!

  • Loveyou<3

    

  • awesome song right here

  • Hey, just goes to show, not all first releases are best. sometimes cover can be better. Musically, I really do dig the Soundgarden version, but this as a complete song beat all other versions hands down. I know there's some who'll say, but firsts are always best. Not necessarily so... Check Tina Turner's first version of Nutbush City limits. Far better second time round! There's my two cents for the day anyways. :-)

  • uhh.....well as a beatles fan right on as an mj fan wtf? i mean i love it ALOT but omg mj is so brave he pulls it off i love you mj i really do *kisses* rest inpeace and may god be with you for all your years

  • Michael Jackson & The Beatles!

    THE BEST SINGER!!

    THE BEST BAND!!

  • @Ryanrulezlol for me, MJ is the best singer, Jackson 5 is the best band, any MJ fan will be like that :D

  • Michael at his baddest.

  • AHHHHHH I JUST FREAKIN LOVE THIS SONG!!!!!!

    LOVE YOU MICHAEL<3

  • i like the orginal better cause its the first but.. mikes is also awesome too

  • Yes, beats the original and I am a HUGE Beatles fan!

  • Love it. Greatest EVER

  • this is rubbish compared 2 the beatles