I think Ron Paul is thes Smartest Pereson who is the only one with true FREEDOM on his mind, people who want anyone else will get OBAMA because Paul supporters like me will not back down, I dont want another Politician who wont cut goverement Ron PAUL has the best answers SIMPLE!
RON PAUL is the oly candidate left who hasn't become a sellout to the corporations. If RON PAUL, doesn't win in any of the states, you all know what happened---the whole election is rigged.
@AsianBoy13579 Or maybe it means he just sucks in the eyes of the majority. RP not making deals with lobbyists doesn't help anyone of the 100's of people in the higher gov't. RP is against earmarks, yet he has still voted for bills he supports (despite saying he'll vote down any earmarked bill) because he says only him being against it won't make a difference, like I said. It takes more to be a president than just someone who eats their vegetables.
@Lizzio1980 Title is stupid to begin with. Santorum at least says what makes him different than the other candidates and then goes down the list. That's why he's getting a decent amount of time. RP was the funniest person in the debate. That's what I wanted to watch; his funny moments, not a video saying he got 20 seconds less than Newt (sarcasm, Paulbots).
How can you spend time on the real issues to debate at hand when CNN is worried about settling petty personal attack issues between the other 3 clowns on stage? It's a damn shame the debate is viewed (in my opinion) as nothing more than late night entertainment. They play it out like it's a boxing match with a hint of Jerry Springer in the mix. Ron Paul is the ONLY one on stage with the most professional answers and stance.
Ron Paul is the only candidate that could beat Obama and they don't want Obama beat. I'm no genius but I'm not stupid enough to believe that Newt or Romney could beat him in this election. Obama is going to Waltz back into the White House for four more if these two clowns are the best the Republicans can cram down our throat. This whole thing is a sham and they could give a fuck about the American People. Romney has made a living running for President but who thought he'd make it the Front.PUKE
@DSOXBLADE No, its because the media is trying to use drama to maintain more screen time for the "top two" contenders that have the most money to spend on them.
If paul isnt the Rep Nominee we should all vote for OBAMA just so he can fuck it up so bad that they will have to give us RandPaul in the Next election.
@perciousnow NOW is the time, not the next election. Ron Paul will be 80 by then. This is our last chance in who knows how long, until someone else grows some balls, has some dignity, and takes a shot at a Presidential bid.
Don't be sad for Mr. Paul he has won many hearts and minds. He may not be our President, But he has won! He has done what he wanted. Waken many people to the real issues we face. The young people are awake, they are the future.
There will be no next time. Thats Ron Paul's mistake. The world will not get past this corruption. You better do some research. Its literally do or die. This next president is the last American President ever. If another puppet gets elected , Americas Constitution is gone and lost forever. There will be no getting it back.
@YouAreOneOfUs Don't be scared we got thousand of years to go. So the bad guys have the wheel now. That will not last forever. I'm a strong believer that good wins in the end.
lol. I went to Billthesheepledog's channel to see how old he was. He wasn't a little kids as I expected ,but I found out his reasons to attack Ron Paul. He thinks Ron Paul is anti Israel.
I didn't think anyone on the web was affected by the Media's Propaganda , Lies and Subliminal Messaging. But he is proof I was wrong.
The media and the powers that be have no interest in an informed critical thinker as a presidential candidate. In fact, should Ron Paul be elected (and I truly believe that is an impossibility due to fraud and manipulation) they would simply kill him... just like they kill everyone who is a threat to what they want.... and kill him without thinking a thing about it. Remember, we have pschopaths in power now.
We need a video with all the "I agree with Dr. Paul on this..." from this debate.. mixed with those same candidates NOT agreeing with him say a month ago...
@monjiaitaly I would prefer a peacefull revolution but i woill bet all my money the us is going to have bad riots , people will fear the gouverment simply put chaos .
@alienware4ever i would prefer peaceful revolt too. But its not going to work. We are all trying to vote the status quo out. There already blocking Ron Paul, so what choice do we have. Our backs are almost to the wall. But your right chaos aka greece, american style :). Looting, shooting the wrong people, Its gonna be a mess.
@monjiaitaly Too bad the US policemen and military dont realise they are part of the 99%. On another note , if Ron Paul ever gets elected (even with the rigged electronic voting machines) He will get assasinated like kennedy did (because he was opposed to the Fed). I am heavely invested into physical silver . Also im canadian ( only 15 eyars old ) and my dad dosint want to have many guns and apparently food storage and solar panels are not important to them . Oh well im just a kid
@NYyankees722vids Here is a new line. Read the constitution and then look at Ron Pauls website that has everything written out on what his plan is. I said that you need to "wake up" because you sound like you hate "RPbots" as you put it in other replys. Utopianism? There is no perfect fantasy land world, but supporting any of the other GOP candidates or even re-electing the current president will mean more of the same failures.
@Nathgrul Far from a new line. I already told someone to speak without using lines like, "what do you have against the Constitution". I've seen RP's planned budget before, if that's what you're talking about. It looks pretty solid but that doesn't mean he should be president. There are so many obvious things that can be cut but the left refuses-- any of these candidates will be better. "Paulbots" is not a term I just made up. You're called Paulbots partly because you spat off the same nonsense..
@NYyankees722vids us "Paulbots" have all done our research and came to the same intellectual conclusions. Its not so far off to say because we are taking information from the same resources.
@Nathgrul lol, no. Not at ALL. Just look around youtube. Search for Ron Paul and all you see are comments about people being called neocons, warmongers, not real conservatives (even though RP isn't, he's libertarian), etc. It's McCarthyism at its best (really, google it if you don't know it... I think it's called McCarthyism). Along with the "well, RP goes to bed next to a copy of the Constitution-- RP 2012!" rhetoric. You know exactly what I'm talking about....
@NYyankees722vids Look, every politician wants to tell you what you want to hear to get elected, bottom line. So, are they all corrupt and "bad" for us? I say, not entirely. Like you have put it, there are good aspects to all of the candidates. But, who is being backed by whom? How are they earning their campaign money and what have they said they will do as far as their plan for the future of this country? Ron Paul is the only one up their with a sound economic plan.
@Nathgrul Again, I like RP's plan for the most part. Some of it I think he'll have to fall in to. I'd rather have our current four candidates combine into 1 person. Mitt's hair, RP's ears, Rick's idk, posture?, and Newt's gestures. Remember when R Perry said if he could choose a running mate (atm), it would be a combo of Newt & Cain (or something... assuming you watch the debates). I don't like Mitt's record of being liberal, though he has defended it well. I've "supported" a few candidates.....
@Nathgrul Mitt was at the bottom of my list. Cain was nice, but he'd be another Obama-- NO experience (though in the pvt sector). I'm leaning towards Mitt since he does have a lot of pvt sector experience and as governor. The idea of attacking Mitt for his wealth is absurd. Do we not want someone who has been successful? Big deal if one candidate has more money than the other. Obama can outspend the GOP nominee 5 to 1 and I won't change my mind. Newt talks about the "elite" as if he's not one.
@Nathgrul You guys are far from "intellectual", though that little line of yours was so well-put (but false, like I said). What are you guys googling then? "Ron Paul is the best" and you click on the top 3 sites, all by Ron Paul fanatics; they tell you to call everyon warmongers, etc. and say RP gets ignored all over the internet? All roads don't lead to Rome here. Pandora doesn't go back into the box, he only comes OUT. (Pineapple Express)
@NYyankees722vids Pandora was let out of the box after world war 2. We are already a "Roman empire" on decline. If we continue to put people(puppets) in office that don't stand for the people, like our forefathers instructed, then this train is going down in a heap of flames, crashing hard. Look at our economy, I understand it takes time to really change things around, but the shit has hit the fan in 2008, and now its only going to get worse before it gets better.
@Nathgrul Everyone votes and has the opportunity to vote (unless specific reason). The voter turnout is always awful year by year. Some country (I wanna say AU?) requires people to vote or face a decent fine. Once that was enacted, their turnout was around 90+%, not that it means all 90% of people followed politics which is a problem. You can't have democracy w/o people being active in the gov't. Face it, no one goes to "town hall meetings" and all that jazz. Thus, you have to deal with a repbc.
@Nathgrul ... Like I've said, no true defense. Just look around. The best you've got on youtube is "Ron Paul got 3 seconds less in a debate than the others". Guess what? There were other candidates that were slightly "ignored" since pre-Iowa. Currently, Rick Santorum has barely received "time" as well. The only reason why he just recently has is because he has somewhat attacked the 2 frontrunners-- they go back and forth. RP's policies but specifically his awful foreign policy......
@Nathgrul I guess I sort of am defending Santorum since you're saying Paul isn't getting a lot of time. Well, neither is Santorum but he's putting up a good fight unlike your god. Santorum isn't bad, at all. I don't know all of his specifics so I can't really judge his policies and what not; though, he was for keeping the soldiers in iraq/afghan which seems absolutely right. To put a deadline on a war is preposterous. As he put it, "you don't play politics with a war" like Obama is and has been
@Nathgrul You're called "Paulbots" becuase you guys all use the same bs rhetoric. You view RP as a god and can't disagree with a single awful point he makes. You can't even defend your political choice. I know you've thrown the words Constitution, warmonger, and neocon around and you probably do it frequently. Even true libertarians don't like RP being the face of libertarianism, instead some prefer Gary Johnson as an improvement (remember that guy who was ignored?).
@Nathgrul The laugh is only on your end, though it was an attempt. Each person has probable flaws in some of their policies and ideas. Now doesn't seem like the time to spend trillions going to the moon. As Mitt put it, Newt promised every state thus far something that's important to them, but how much of it is likely to get done? He's lying for votes and calls Mitt a liar. If Paul changed his 9/11 reasoning and foreign policy, he'd be the constant frontrunner with Mitt.
@Nathgrul There's an even better defense. If I said I support Newt, you'd still say "that explains everything". Before you were complaining about me defending Santorum. Calling him Mittens just makes you look like a dolt.
@NYyankees722vids haha yeah it was a quick response before I left for work. If you have the time, look up: "Ten Reasons Not to Vote for Ron Paul" the video was made by Adam Kokesh. It says a lot of what i want to say that can't fit into this box.
@Nathgrul ..... his awful foreign policy is based off of utopianism and not what's best for America. Having two bodies of water around the US doesn't mean we're safe, nor does playing the role of the isolationist. In addition, RP's reasoning for why we were "rightfully" attacked on 9/11 is unacceptable, especially for someone who can be POTUS; we already have the Apology-in-Chief and don't need it. Killing a US-born terrorist is perfectly just in this world, but not to RP. You agree w/ RP?
@NYyankees722vids "his awful foreign policy?" Its outlined in the constitution exactly what RP is preaching about his foreign policy. That leads me to believe that your for changing the constitution and to be a "war monger". Any type of "pre-emptive" military strike and bases on foreign soil is not a "defense"..it is an act of war that is not declared. The reason why congress won't declare war on Iraq or Afghanistan is because they don't want to be held accountable.
@Nathgrul His foreign policy is beyond repulsive. Stop with the "it's the Constitution" bullshit. The only thing in the Constitution you remember w/o looking up is the 1st Amendment I'm sure, maybe the 2nd two. RP is talking beyond the Constitution with his foreign policy. He's cool with Iran getting nukes if they want, leaving all of our "dangerous" bases, not killing US-born terrorists, etc. Ron Paul wants to change the Constitution as it is. It has been changed a number of times.....
@Nathgrul That's why Paulbots are idiots. They point and scream "warmonger" as a defense whenever they have no other form of defense, which is always. Last I checked, it was peaceful to make sure Iran doesn't get a nuke or capabilities. You're setting up a nuclear world war by letting them and others like them get one.If anything,Paulbots are the indirect "warmongers" for thinking it's okay for enemies (including terrorist theocracies ex. Al Qaeda) to get nukes as they wish. That's real peaceful
@NYyankees722vids Pakistan has nukes, India has nukes, China has nukes, Russia has nukes, we have nukes, Israel has nukes, and on and on..you really think if Iran got nukes it would destroy the world? What would destroy the world is if we all used them.
@Nathgrul wow... type a decent amount of stuff then hit ESC... it sucks. Anyway, none of the current nations with nukes present a threat. China, Russia, probably India all know better than to nuke any other country for no true reason. Each of those nations including ours need each other as part of the world economy. Iran doesn't give a shit and already supports terrorist organizations. Even the Obama admin knows better than to let iran get nukes, especially if it falls into someone elses hands..
@NYyankees722vids Most of what you said here is right, except that the Obama admin is simply piggy-backing on what Bush already was working on. Fear-mongering, calling an attack on other countries as looking out for our defense. This is madness. I don't buy this whole war on terror bullshit concocted by our government, they allowed 9-11 to happen so they could go get more resources for themselves. Its so obvious.
@Nathgrul Obama campaigned on everything that portrayed him as anti-Bush policies. He's flip flopped on the Bush tax cuts, GITMO was going to be closed, no more troops were to be sent, the war was supposed to be over, $8 trillion of debt is irresponsible, etc. Now that he's president and has experts and talks to high ranking officer's etc, he realizes his logic was wrong and Bush was right. I believe Obama was against raising the debt ceiling when Bush did it. Look at him now. /done
@Nathgrul Your logic of "oh, we have nukes... let everyone else have nukes" is beyond stupid. Iran getting nukes and possibly using them will start a nuclear world war (thanks to everyone having allies... if Israel jumps in, we're supposed to; vice versa). You don't seriously believe in RP's so-called logic. You just agree with him because he's RP. Thank God Paulbots aren't the popular vote and there are the least of all candidates.
@NYyankees722vids what I meant was, yes Iran having nukes would be dangerous, but their right not to have them is ridiculous. Why did we allow India and Pakistan and North Korea and China to obtain them? Personally, I think we should keep Iran in check, but not dictate what they can and can not do. Its like taking guns away from the people because there are some bad apples that might use them to kill others. I am far from pro nuke for Iran, but its the principle of it.
@Nathgrul Despite my message that you'll get, I'm responding to this and the next. The word "right" gets thrown around a lot as well. People say they have a right, but there are restrictions. IE: you don't have a right to yell "bomb" on an airplane, or "fire!" in a crowded theatre (unless of course there is one!). Your "rights" don't protect that. You can be rightfully fired by calling your boss a racial slur. Your "rights" don't protect that, either.....
@Nathgrul We have "rights" because it's what the gov't is willing to protect. Without gov't, you have no rights. I don't wanna go in depth, but hopefully you get it. Shouldn't Iran have the right to blow up whoever they want in your logic? (no) That's what I'm getting at.
@Nathgrul Apparently doing what's best for the common good isn't what you guys seek. That's what the Constitution was seeking while keeping a balance between gov't and the people. The "Iraq War Resolution" took care of your problem. Even then, I'm not an avid reader of the Constitution, so where does it say Congress has to declare war? All I've heard was they have the POWER to declare war. That seems distorted. As it was, Al Qaeda declared war on the people "occupying their holy land"...
@Nathgrul Anyone that attacks Americans or allied soldiers for that matter are treated as enemy combatants. 9/11 was an act of war by a theocracy itself. Why the double standard, Paulbot? Because we deserved 9/11?
@monjiaitaly "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? LET THEM TAKE ARMS! The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them!"
--Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1787. ME 6:373, Papers 12:356
@monjiaitaly Do I have to say it again? This is why paulbots are the worst "supporters". They seem worse than Obama supporters, which is sickening. You can't put up a half decent argument w/o throwing neocon, warmonger, etc. in a sentence; asolutely no solid defense. How could RP tell anyone to support him when RP supporters can't even say why (without looking stupid)?
@monjiaitaly Given your first comment I replied to, clearly not; especially since you didn't bother saying why RP is the best candidate. Paulbots have the reputation of not being able to defend their god, Ron Paul. Give it a shot and think for yourself. Even RP has problem(s) with the Constitution. All candidates want to spend less money. Now where's your defense?
I thought CNN was much better than MSNBC and they were giving Ron Paul to go first in some subjects and Ron Paul is like an economist, he keeps it short and precise. He does need to find a way to get more air time. But right now he's out of element being in Florida, hopefully the next State will be more promising.
I agree 100% they do not give Ron Paul his time to speak and he should whine and complain just like the other guys to get more time. Ron Paul should be the next president. In my opinion he is the best suited for the job.
I already voted for Ron Paul, but truthfully when he's given time to speak, he's not the type to 'keep' speaking. Don't blame all the lack of time speaking on the media, because he's not a long speaker. Compare his answer about why his wife would be a good 1st lady compared to the other candidates. Time that. Yes, I do believe that the media does not always give him a chance to voice in on everything.
and they wonder why he speaks so fast..however, fortunately, he can get done in 89 seconds [and better w/13 min] what the others will never get done, no matter how much time they have. consider it a handicap, for the morons...I want him to have more, but don't believe he needs it to succeed and get his message across...cause he ROCKS [and I'm sure is wearing a cape under his suit ;0)
There's NOTHING fair and balance about the U.S election process. Unfortunately, I predict the peaceful revolution will turn out to be a violent one once ALL you Americans wake up from your comatose!
He is certainly not getting the time he deserves, but frankly it might be more beneficial for him to let Newt and Mitt destroy each other, and eventually people will realize he is the only candidate who isn't a childish cry baby. (Santorum will just destroy himself so he's not a problem)
@nicolaskids I can tell you have absolutely no knowledge of history. The majority of the American public was for neutrality during WWII. It was only when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor that we went to war. Constitutionally through Congress, by the way, which Ron Paul would have been fine with.
First thing after the revolution......all the media should be put on trial to determine if they were in collusion with the "regime" in Washington, to deprive us of our rights, lied to support illegal wars, pushed Cultural Marxism, thwarted the election process, and suppressed evidence of war crimes by the administration. THEN....the ones that are guilty should get a traitors punishment, and their families should have their assets confiscated for profiting off of R.I.C.O. crimes.
"First thing after the revolution......all the media should be put on trial to determine if they were in collusion with the "regime" in Washington, to deprive us of our rights, lied to support illegal wars, pushed Cultural Marxism, thwarted the election process, and suppressed evidence of war crimes by the administration. THEN....the ones that are guilty should get a traitors punishment, and their families should have their assets confiscated for profiting off of R.I.C.O. crimes."
That's messed up everyone votes for Ron Paul and they split all his votes away to Gingrich and Rommey ... lol it's time for a new party Fuck the Democracts n Republicans
@nicolaskids thats a pretty stupid thing to say. Its because we had money to go to war now we have negiative 15 trillion dollars in the bank and thats why he is agianst these unjust wars
boy he beat the sht out of though didnt he... they all kept saying I agree with Paul, yeah I agree with Paul... I was screaming at the TV, yeah just drop out and endorse him already you fakes. I hope someone strings together all the I agree with Ron Paul moments. that would be powerful.
No, the MSM is ultimately responsible for his low polling in Florida. They ignore him in debates, then never mention him after the debate. As long as we use computers whose votes are tallied in secret, the current election system cannot be trusted, either. We need to find better ways to reach people. I believe it is happening on it's own. We just have no way of knowing how this battle will end right now.
Ron Paul is getting smashed by the NWO owned media...his message is getting out here and there, but not to enough people...Im voting for him, he's America's last chance...
I like the idea of a write in but I would rather see Aron Paul third party run. If he doesn't run third party I will probably vote for Gary Johnson as the libertarian candidate. Ron is by far the best choice but Gary has a lot of the same ideas. Ron Paul first but Gary Johnson as a back up.
AGREED. PAUL WILL BE WRITTEN IN FOR MY VOTE TOO. I BELIEVE PAUL ALREADY HAS SECURED A SAY SO FOR GOP. THE GOP IS CURRENTLY PLAYING ELIMINATION OF OTHER CANDIDATES.
That's among the highest in the world. Canada brought theirs down to 16% imagine if we took it down to 0%-5% You'd have people around the world begging to open plants and businesses in America...
"Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure."
One of my comments on Tweeter during the debate was "Anyone? When did Ron Paul become Pope Paul? and everyone now feels the need to kiss his ring? Kissing up to his supporters? him? "
I can see the bias on what questions are asked , how they are ask and Wolf cut Ron Paul off on his 2 first times speaking.
Santorum looked like the man on the "inside" with CNN. A cpl of his questions lead to Scripted responses. He had fake "anger" which was supposed to be "passion". Guess his acting needs work.
@YouAreOneOfUs That's because you don't make fun or get mad at the crazy uncle or senile grandpa while you are around them. You are cordial and when the evening is done, you and the other sane people then laugh all the way home .
@imamrauf I somewhat agree but whoever comes up with the questions does so in a strategic manner as to leave Ron Paul out of it.
Why don't they ask Ron Paul about what he's currently doing in Congress instead of purposely asking questions that encourage Gingrich & Romney to battle.
The first half of the post-debate analysis was a joke as usual, only mentioning that Paul was "funny" followed by airing his bike race proposal while omitting the important question he was answering.
Don't know which debate you were watching. Wolf cut Ron Paul off , the first 2 times he was speaking and tried to ask him loaded questions ,designed to leave a negative image in the viewers minds. Wolf is just another Criminal media schill ,that should be tried for Treason , like the rest of them.
Soon, Americas financial situation will get sooo bad, people will DEMAND Ron Paul. Majority just haven't woken up yet as to how bad thing's are under the surface.
I'll write in Paul too. Knowing my vote went to America. Instead of insider trading corrupt 'establishment' politician.
RONALD PAUL, in my opinion, would be the new "RONALD REAGAN" image that everybody's obsessing about. Its all comes down to Americans enlightening themselves via alternative media sources or sit like little kids in front of there TV's and be feed fairy tales like they were taught in public schools...Pro Reality Administration vs. Fairy Tale Administration....bottom line Ron Paul 2012
I was watching it live on cnn.com and it magically cut out when ron paul was giving his response to the question of how each candidate's decisions in office would be influenced by their religion. Needless to say, I reconnected immediately to mitt romney responding. Hmmm.
Paul deserves .0001 of an hour. He's a presidential joke!
Ron Paul's foreign polidiocity summed up: "Mr. Akamanajinidab, please be nice to us:]. We will leave you alone. It's ok to blow up the only democracy in the mideast. We don't kare, cause we are isolationists. and we will dance in green fields of oil together while the black helicopters fly . . . tra la la la la . . . oh something something 'Constitution' .... I follow the Constitutions man, and Mr. Putin and Mr. Hu U should, too."
@WeknowhoUR wow you have such a good understanding of world affairs. wow maybe you should be president. That was a highly intelligent speech, well thought out, with lots of pertinent facts and expertly crafted. However it is past your bedtime and you dont want to be grumpy in the morning
Ron Paul gets screwed every time! The evil drone-puppets get more than enough time and RP gets snubbed! Nothing fair about politics... as they always act like little children.
Actually, I thought Wolfe Blitzer was more fair than any of the other moderators. Lots of bickering between Newt & Mitt which takes up more time, but I see as a negative. Santorum...warmonger!
im from ireland and the coverage on the news is all but ron paul and likewise the british media, totally shunnin him,fkn rotten!! ,wish shpll in the us would wtfu!
I saw 1 vid that said there was a media blackout ordered by Obama. I haven't looked into it. It would explain the other vid that was talking about a media blackout of Ron Paul and to list the country if it was happening where you are. There were a lot of countries reporting that there was , in fact , a blackout of Ron Paul.
"President Paul, the president of Cuba is on the phone"
Paul: "Hi. Why did you call?"
This is what he said. This is the extent of his foreign policy knowledge. America needs a bit more than this in a president. Yes he got a reaction from the crowd. They were laughing.
@Billthesheepdog That is because he wants to lift sanctions and trade. Putting embargoes on Cuba has done nothing but create animosity towards the US by the Cuban people.
Ron Paul was pointing out the idiocy of the question , not to mention that it was an attempt at a fictional loaded question. I guess you are a good little sheeple and didn't notice.
@YouAreOneOfUs is that your answer for everything he does? He said that because he doesn't intend on having ANY foreign policy. None. He intends on becoming isolationist and just appeasing our enemies like Chamberlin did in London before WW2. "Mind our own business and the bad people will ignore us". Never will work and never has. He is a straw man only so you have a distraction. The sad population doesn't care about the constitution any more. They are all numb
You are either a schill ,Ignorant (about Ron Paul policy ,because you are wrong an uninformed) or brainwashed by the media.
I was going to address everyone of your statements , but they are so ludicrous ,they don't deserve an informed explanation. Look up the word Isolationist , stop being Ignorant. I like your idea that punishing a whole contries peoples will somehow punish the Leader. If it works within the first cpl years , yes. AFTER 50 ,its not working.
@YouAreOneOfUs The people get the leasers they deserve. Just as Ben Franklin used to say "Those who give up liberty for safety deserve neither" America is sick with sin. Until it repents of that sin it will continue to be sick and will die. Who the republican nominee is will not matter a bit. I fought and was injured for my country in war so have the right to say that this is not the country I fought for, It is sick with sin and is dying. Ron Paul can't stop that.
seems like the media are trying to steal time for the newt and romney show arguing about who is the most immoral and corrupt - romney seemed to get the loudest cheers with his demagoging i just dont understand how people can believe such utter obvious lies - i like newts plan for the moon base ron paul should take it on with the plan to pay for it being AN INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL MOON BASE PAID FOR BY ALL COUNTRIES WAR AND WEAPONS BUDGET - probly would have got booed by the republican morons
@libertarianwarbook lol are they really? i havent really spent much time on twitter but im glad they post on there haha. thanks for checking out the videos! GO RON PAUL!!!
I think Ron Paul is thes Smartest Pereson who is the only one with true FREEDOM on his mind, people who want anyone else will get OBAMA because Paul supporters like me will not back down, I dont want another Politician who wont cut goverement Ron PAUL has the best answers SIMPLE!
PeterKiryluk 1 month ago
RON PAUL is the oly candidate left who hasn't become a sellout to the corporations. If RON PAUL, doesn't win in any of the states, you all know what happened---the whole election is rigged.
AsianBoy13579 1 month ago
@AsianBoy13579 Or maybe it means he just sucks in the eyes of the majority. RP not making deals with lobbyists doesn't help anyone of the 100's of people in the higher gov't. RP is against earmarks, yet he has still voted for bills he supports (despite saying he'll vote down any earmarked bill) because he says only him being against it won't make a difference, like I said. It takes more to be a president than just someone who eats their vegetables.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
Title is misleading.. the title should say: Ron Paul gets lest amount of time in ALL DEBATES but still wins
Lizzio1980 1 month ago
@Lizzio1980 Title is stupid to begin with. Santorum at least says what makes him different than the other candidates and then goes down the list. That's why he's getting a decent amount of time. RP was the funniest person in the debate. That's what I wanted to watch; his funny moments, not a video saying he got 20 seconds less than Newt (sarcasm, Paulbots).
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
Ron Paul isn't going to be president. It's time to leave your fantasy, utopian world.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids lolwut?
Nathgrul 1 month ago
How can you spend time on the real issues to debate at hand when CNN is worried about settling petty personal attack issues between the other 3 clowns on stage? It's a damn shame the debate is viewed (in my opinion) as nothing more than late night entertainment. They play it out like it's a boxing match with a hint of Jerry Springer in the mix. Ron Paul is the ONLY one on stage with the most professional answers and stance.
Neon360 1 month ago
Ron Paul is the only candidate that could beat Obama and they don't want Obama beat. I'm no genius but I'm not stupid enough to believe that Newt or Romney could beat him in this election. Obama is going to Waltz back into the White House for four more if these two clowns are the best the Republicans can cram down our throat. This whole thing is a sham and they could give a fuck about the American People. Romney has made a living running for President but who thought he'd make it the Front.PUKE
nucsol 1 month ago
He gets less time because Rick, Newt and Romney keep bitching about there stupid past and future policies.
Ron Paul 2012
DSOXBLADE 1 month ago
@DSOXBLADE No, its because the media is trying to use drama to maintain more screen time for the "top two" contenders that have the most money to spend on them.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul NOOOOO!!! ITS BOTH WHAT YOU SAID AND I SAID.
DSOXBLADE 1 month ago
If paul isnt the Rep Nominee we should all vote for OBAMA just so he can fuck it up so bad that they will have to give us RandPaul in the Next election.
perciousnow 1 month ago
@perciousnow NOW is the time, not the next election. Ron Paul will be 80 by then. This is our last chance in who knows how long, until someone else grows some balls, has some dignity, and takes a shot at a Presidential bid.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@perciousnow oh sorry you said Rand Paul, lol.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
Don't be sad for Mr. Paul he has won many hearts and minds. He may not be our President, But he has won! He has done what he wanted. Waken many people to the real issues we face. The young people are awake, they are the future.
Ron Paul 2012
gator051 1 month ago
@gator051
There will be no next time. Thats Ron Paul's mistake. The world will not get past this corruption. You better do some research. Its literally do or die. This next president is the last American President ever. If another puppet gets elected , Americas Constitution is gone and lost forever. There will be no getting it back.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs Don't be scared we got thousand of years to go. So the bad guys have the wheel now. That will not last forever. I'm a strong believer that good wins in the end.
gator051 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my video about the debate and comment on who won!
AdamMorgan360 1 month ago
lol. I went to Billthesheepledog's channel to see how old he was. He wasn't a little kids as I expected ,but I found out his reasons to attack Ron Paul. He thinks Ron Paul is anti Israel.
I didn't think anyone on the web was affected by the Media's Propaganda , Lies and Subliminal Messaging. But he is proof I was wrong.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs too much flouride in the water!!!
matlarson10 1 month ago
The media and the powers that be have no interest in an informed critical thinker as a presidential candidate. In fact, should Ron Paul be elected (and I truly believe that is an impossibility due to fraud and manipulation) they would simply kill him... just like they kill everyone who is a threat to what they want.... and kill him without thinking a thing about it. Remember, we have pschopaths in power now.
BourneAccident 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We need a video with all the "I agree with Dr. Paul on this..." from this debate.. mixed with those same candidates NOT agreeing with him say a month ago...
olesideburns 1 month ago
Sorry but the USA is in trouble Buy guns,food and constitutional currency for the soon to be violent revolution .
alienware4ever 1 month ago
@alienware4ever I hope so.
monjiaitaly 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly I would prefer a peacefull revolution but i woill bet all my money the us is going to have bad riots , people will fear the gouverment simply put chaos .
alienware4ever 1 month ago
@alienware4ever i would prefer peaceful revolt too. But its not going to work. We are all trying to vote the status quo out. There already blocking Ron Paul, so what choice do we have. Our backs are almost to the wall. But your right chaos aka greece, american style :). Looting, shooting the wrong people, Its gonna be a mess.
monjiaitaly 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly Too bad the US policemen and military dont realise they are part of the 99%. On another note , if Ron Paul ever gets elected (even with the rigged electronic voting machines) He will get assasinated like kennedy did (because he was opposed to the Fed). I am heavely invested into physical silver . Also im canadian ( only 15 eyars old ) and my dad dosint want to have many guns and apparently food storage and solar panels are not important to them . Oh well im just a kid
alienware4ever 1 month ago
@alienware4ever a pretty smart kid :)
monjiaitaly 1 month ago
@alienware4ever You're a fool.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids no, your the fool. You need to wake the fuck up.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Nice. "Wake up, America!" Get a new line, old sport. "People just don't fucking get it, man." - Dana Vachon
On a more serious note, how am I the fool that needs to "wake up"? Hopefully you leave utopianism out of it.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Here is a new line. Read the constitution and then look at Ron Pauls website that has everything written out on what his plan is. I said that you need to "wake up" because you sound like you hate "RPbots" as you put it in other replys. Utopianism? There is no perfect fantasy land world, but supporting any of the other GOP candidates or even re-electing the current president will mean more of the same failures.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Far from a new line. I already told someone to speak without using lines like, "what do you have against the Constitution". I've seen RP's planned budget before, if that's what you're talking about. It looks pretty solid but that doesn't mean he should be president. There are so many obvious things that can be cut but the left refuses-- any of these candidates will be better. "Paulbots" is not a term I just made up. You're called Paulbots partly because you spat off the same nonsense..
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids us "Paulbots" have all done our research and came to the same intellectual conclusions. Its not so far off to say because we are taking information from the same resources.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul lol, no. Not at ALL. Just look around youtube. Search for Ron Paul and all you see are comments about people being called neocons, warmongers, not real conservatives (even though RP isn't, he's libertarian), etc. It's McCarthyism at its best (really, google it if you don't know it... I think it's called McCarthyism). Along with the "well, RP goes to bed next to a copy of the Constitution-- RP 2012!" rhetoric. You know exactly what I'm talking about....
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Look, every politician wants to tell you what you want to hear to get elected, bottom line. So, are they all corrupt and "bad" for us? I say, not entirely. Like you have put it, there are good aspects to all of the candidates. But, who is being backed by whom? How are they earning their campaign money and what have they said they will do as far as their plan for the future of this country? Ron Paul is the only one up their with a sound economic plan.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Again, I like RP's plan for the most part. Some of it I think he'll have to fall in to. I'd rather have our current four candidates combine into 1 person. Mitt's hair, RP's ears, Rick's idk, posture?, and Newt's gestures. Remember when R Perry said if he could choose a running mate (atm), it would be a combo of Newt & Cain (or something... assuming you watch the debates). I don't like Mitt's record of being liberal, though he has defended it well. I've "supported" a few candidates.....
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids I agree with you on this one.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Mitt was at the bottom of my list. Cain was nice, but he'd be another Obama-- NO experience (though in the pvt sector). I'm leaning towards Mitt since he does have a lot of pvt sector experience and as governor. The idea of attacking Mitt for his wealth is absurd. Do we not want someone who has been successful? Big deal if one candidate has more money than the other. Obama can outspend the GOP nominee 5 to 1 and I won't change my mind. Newt talks about the "elite" as if he's not one.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@Nathgrul You guys are far from "intellectual", though that little line of yours was so well-put (but false, like I said). What are you guys googling then? "Ron Paul is the best" and you click on the top 3 sites, all by Ron Paul fanatics; they tell you to call everyon warmongers, etc. and say RP gets ignored all over the internet? All roads don't lead to Rome here. Pandora doesn't go back into the box, he only comes OUT. (Pineapple Express)
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Pandora was let out of the box after world war 2. We are already a "Roman empire" on decline. If we continue to put people(puppets) in office that don't stand for the people, like our forefathers instructed, then this train is going down in a heap of flames, crashing hard. Look at our economy, I understand it takes time to really change things around, but the shit has hit the fan in 2008, and now its only going to get worse before it gets better.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Everyone votes and has the opportunity to vote (unless specific reason). The voter turnout is always awful year by year. Some country (I wanna say AU?) requires people to vote or face a decent fine. Once that was enacted, their turnout was around 90+%, not that it means all 90% of people followed politics which is a problem. You can't have democracy w/o people being active in the gov't. Face it, no one goes to "town hall meetings" and all that jazz. Thus, you have to deal with a repbc.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids this is true.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul ... Like I've said, no true defense. Just look around. The best you've got on youtube is "Ron Paul got 3 seconds less in a debate than the others". Guess what? There were other candidates that were slightly "ignored" since pre-Iowa. Currently, Rick Santorum has barely received "time" as well. The only reason why he just recently has is because he has somewhat attacked the 2 frontrunners-- they go back and forth. RP's policies but specifically his awful foreign policy......
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids so your defending Sanotarium?(spelled it wrong for laughs) That guys worse than the other 3, in my opinion.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul I guess I sort of am defending Santorum since you're saying Paul isn't getting a lot of time. Well, neither is Santorum but he's putting up a good fight unlike your god. Santorum isn't bad, at all. I don't know all of his specifics so I can't really judge his policies and what not; though, he was for keeping the soldiers in iraq/afghan which seems absolutely right. To put a deadline on a war is preposterous. As he put it, "you don't play politics with a war" like Obama is and has been
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids "my god"? lol..I'm simply defending my political choice, you sound like a nut job man honestly.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul You're called "Paulbots" becuase you guys all use the same bs rhetoric. You view RP as a god and can't disagree with a single awful point he makes. You can't even defend your political choice. I know you've thrown the words Constitution, warmonger, and neocon around and you probably do it frequently. Even true libertarians don't like RP being the face of libertarianism, instead some prefer Gary Johnson as an improvement (remember that guy who was ignored?).
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@Nathgrul The laugh is only on your end, though it was an attempt. Each person has probable flaws in some of their policies and ideas. Now doesn't seem like the time to spend trillions going to the moon. As Mitt put it, Newt promised every state thus far something that's important to them, but how much of it is likely to get done? He's lying for votes and calls Mitt a liar. If Paul changed his 9/11 reasoning and foreign policy, he'd be the constant frontrunner with Mitt.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids so you support Mittens? Well, that explains everything then.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul There's an even better defense. If I said I support Newt, you'd still say "that explains everything". Before you were complaining about me defending Santorum. Calling him Mittens just makes you look like a dolt.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids haha yeah it was a quick response before I left for work. If you have the time, look up: "Ten Reasons Not to Vote for Ron Paul" the video was made by Adam Kokesh. It says a lot of what i want to say that can't fit into this box.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul ..... his awful foreign policy is based off of utopianism and not what's best for America. Having two bodies of water around the US doesn't mean we're safe, nor does playing the role of the isolationist. In addition, RP's reasoning for why we were "rightfully" attacked on 9/11 is unacceptable, especially for someone who can be POTUS; we already have the Apology-in-Chief and don't need it. Killing a US-born terrorist is perfectly just in this world, but not to RP. You agree w/ RP?
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids "his awful foreign policy?" Its outlined in the constitution exactly what RP is preaching about his foreign policy. That leads me to believe that your for changing the constitution and to be a "war monger". Any type of "pre-emptive" military strike and bases on foreign soil is not a "defense"..it is an act of war that is not declared. The reason why congress won't declare war on Iraq or Afghanistan is because they don't want to be held accountable.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul His foreign policy is beyond repulsive. Stop with the "it's the Constitution" bullshit. The only thing in the Constitution you remember w/o looking up is the 1st Amendment I'm sure, maybe the 2nd two. RP is talking beyond the Constitution with his foreign policy. He's cool with Iran getting nukes if they want, leaving all of our "dangerous" bases, not killing US-born terrorists, etc. Ron Paul wants to change the Constitution as it is. It has been changed a number of times.....
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@Nathgrul That's why Paulbots are idiots. They point and scream "warmonger" as a defense whenever they have no other form of defense, which is always. Last I checked, it was peaceful to make sure Iran doesn't get a nuke or capabilities. You're setting up a nuclear world war by letting them and others like them get one.If anything,Paulbots are the indirect "warmongers" for thinking it's okay for enemies (including terrorist theocracies ex. Al Qaeda) to get nukes as they wish. That's real peaceful
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Pakistan has nukes, India has nukes, China has nukes, Russia has nukes, we have nukes, Israel has nukes, and on and on..you really think if Iran got nukes it would destroy the world? What would destroy the world is if we all used them.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul wow... type a decent amount of stuff then hit ESC... it sucks. Anyway, none of the current nations with nukes present a threat. China, Russia, probably India all know better than to nuke any other country for no true reason. Each of those nations including ours need each other as part of the world economy. Iran doesn't give a shit and already supports terrorist organizations. Even the Obama admin knows better than to let iran get nukes, especially if it falls into someone elses hands..
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Most of what you said here is right, except that the Obama admin is simply piggy-backing on what Bush already was working on. Fear-mongering, calling an attack on other countries as looking out for our defense. This is madness. I don't buy this whole war on terror bullshit concocted by our government, they allowed 9-11 to happen so they could go get more resources for themselves. Its so obvious.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Obama campaigned on everything that portrayed him as anti-Bush policies. He's flip flopped on the Bush tax cuts, GITMO was going to be closed, no more troops were to be sent, the war was supposed to be over, $8 trillion of debt is irresponsible, etc. Now that he's president and has experts and talks to high ranking officer's etc, he realizes his logic was wrong and Bush was right. I believe Obama was against raising the debt ceiling when Bush did it. Look at him now. /done
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Your logic of "oh, we have nukes... let everyone else have nukes" is beyond stupid. Iran getting nukes and possibly using them will start a nuclear world war (thanks to everyone having allies... if Israel jumps in, we're supposed to; vice versa). You don't seriously believe in RP's so-called logic. You just agree with him because he's RP. Thank God Paulbots aren't the popular vote and there are the least of all candidates.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids what I meant was, yes Iran having nukes would be dangerous, but their right not to have them is ridiculous. Why did we allow India and Pakistan and North Korea and China to obtain them? Personally, I think we should keep Iran in check, but not dictate what they can and can not do. Its like taking guns away from the people because there are some bad apples that might use them to kill others. I am far from pro nuke for Iran, but its the principle of it.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Despite my message that you'll get, I'm responding to this and the next. The word "right" gets thrown around a lot as well. People say they have a right, but there are restrictions. IE: you don't have a right to yell "bomb" on an airplane, or "fire!" in a crowded theatre (unless of course there is one!). Your "rights" don't protect that. You can be rightfully fired by calling your boss a racial slur. Your "rights" don't protect that, either.....
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Just got your message.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul We have "rights" because it's what the gov't is willing to protect. Without gov't, you have no rights. I don't wanna go in depth, but hopefully you get it. Shouldn't Iran have the right to blow up whoever they want in your logic? (no) That's what I'm getting at.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids But its ok for us to bomb the hell out of innocents in Afghanistan and Iraq and Pakistan and call it defending our freedoms? wow..
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Apparently doing what's best for the common good isn't what you guys seek. That's what the Constitution was seeking while keeping a balance between gov't and the people. The "Iraq War Resolution" took care of your problem. Even then, I'm not an avid reader of the Constitution, so where does it say Congress has to declare war? All I've heard was they have the POWER to declare war. That seems distorted. As it was, Al Qaeda declared war on the people "occupying their holy land"...
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Al Qaeda isn't a country.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@Nathgrul I'm know that, old sport. That's why I said "theocracy". Look it up rather than responding to things I never said.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@Nathgrul Anyone that attacks Americans or allied soldiers for that matter are treated as enemy combatants. 9/11 was an act of war by a theocracy itself. Why the double standard, Paulbot? Because we deserved 9/11?
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids yes, and you know why.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids Why would you think that ?
alienware4ever 1 month ago
And says more than all the other candidates combined
TheSavageGospel 1 month ago
Comment removed
AdamMorgan360 1 month ago
Ron Paul or violent revolution, thats it.
monjiaitaly 1 month ago 11
@monjiaitaly "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? LET THEM TAKE ARMS! The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them!"
--Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1787. ME 6:373, Papers 12:356
StandpointCinema 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly No, that is far from "it". This is why no one can take Ron Paul and his "supporters" serious.
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids if you cant understand, that he is the best person to lead this country, I feel sorry for you.
monjiaitaly 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly Do I have to say it again? This is why paulbots are the worst "supporters". They seem worse than Obama supporters, which is sickening. You can't put up a half decent argument w/o throwing neocon, warmonger, etc. in a sentence; asolutely no solid defense. How could RP tell anyone to support him when RP supporters can't even say why (without looking stupid)?
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@NYyankees722vids i can say why, just ask me lol?
monjiaitaly 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly Given your first comment I replied to, clearly not; especially since you didn't bother saying why RP is the best candidate. Paulbots have the reputation of not being able to defend their god, Ron Paul. Give it a shot and think for yourself. Even RP has problem(s) with the Constitution. All candidates want to spend less money. Now where's your defense?
NYyankees722vids 1 month ago
@monjiaitaly I'll be one of the first to lead it.
Nathgrul 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is the modern day Patrick Henry "Give me Liberty or give me Death"
katsfanman 1 month ago
Its the Vote count, no dibold voting. they fake results, check the vote to the exis count????
sparrowlink 1 month ago
I thought CNN was much better than MSNBC and they were giving Ron Paul to go first in some subjects and Ron Paul is like an economist, he keeps it short and precise. He does need to find a way to get more air time. But right now he's out of element being in Florida, hopefully the next State will be more promising.
AdamGomez87 1 month ago
We can't rely on the media. We have to BE the media.
One man can't do it alone. This is our fight. Our future. Our lives.
The Founding Fathers pledged "our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor". It will take nothing less today.
Give something. DO something. Then repeat.
ronpaul2012(dot)com ronpaulcountry(dot)com
carcabe 1 month ago
Seriously, we boycott all CNN advertisers. Hit them in their pocketbooks. That's all they care about or understand.
Goobyusa 1 month ago
Comment removed
AdamMorgan360 1 month ago
Spread this!
Go to the dailypaul website and find the thread with the title:
"CNN GOP Debate Advertiser List and sample letter"
FIGHT BACK!
amommamust 1 month ago
I agree 100% they do not give Ron Paul his time to speak and he should whine and complain just like the other guys to get more time. Ron Paul should be the next president. In my opinion he is the best suited for the job.
forthehorde8987 1 month ago
Ron Paul or none of the above
EDTHEWATERGUY 1 month ago
Fuck the media, they are guilty of treason.
2skullscrushing 1 month ago
I already voted for Ron Paul, but truthfully when he's given time to speak, he's not the type to 'keep' speaking. Don't blame all the lack of time speaking on the media, because he's not a long speaker. Compare his answer about why his wife would be a good 1st lady compared to the other candidates. Time that. Yes, I do believe that the media does not always give him a chance to voice in on everything.
fwbrc51 1 month ago
Ron Paul or Bust, the power and money junkies will try to trash him at every turn - don't buy what they are trying to sell you.
yaahme 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America for Americans! Ignore the controlled media! Ron Paul 2012!
10tealeaf 1 month ago
They will get him with the voting machines this has become a banana republic.
richco7773 1 month ago 2
and they wonder why he speaks so fast..however, fortunately, he can get done in 89 seconds [and better w/13 min] what the others will never get done, no matter how much time they have. consider it a handicap, for the morons...I want him to have more, but don't believe he needs it to succeed and get his message across...cause he ROCKS [and I'm sure is wearing a cape under his suit ;0)
preparadox 1 month ago
There's NOTHING fair and balance about the U.S election process. Unfortunately, I predict the peaceful revolution will turn out to be a violent one once ALL you Americans wake up from your comatose!
FXSwissTrader 1 month ago 2
I'd vote for Ron Paul, its too bad I'm in Canada. :-(
D33Lux 1 month ago
@D33Lux Just look at the obituaries for a name and go to your nearest US City to vote for him lol They probably won't even check your ID.
WashingtonEnema 1 month ago
He is certainly not getting the time he deserves, but frankly it might be more beneficial for him to let Newt and Mitt destroy each other, and eventually people will realize he is the only candidate who isn't a childish cry baby. (Santorum will just destroy himself so he's not a problem)
Partyotter 1 month ago
Media getting paid to be biased
glennfabian 1 month ago
Does it matter? Anyone with a brain knowt the it's all fixed. Sorry for the insult with brain part.
TheAfternoonclub 1 month ago
Ron Paul knows more about the economic situation, current employment issues ect and more he should have his time to speak!
StockMarketFunding 1 month ago
He is totally getting the shaft!!! It's so unfair & LAME. I'm also voting for Ron Paul, on the ballot or not...
Good Post, THANKS !!
lowpross11 1 month ago 2
@nicolaskids I can tell you have absolutely no knowledge of history. The majority of the American public was for neutrality during WWII. It was only when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor that we went to war. Constitutionally through Congress, by the way, which Ron Paul would have been fine with.
ctbone123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
First thing after the revolution......all the media should be put on trial to determine if they were in collusion with the "regime" in Washington, to deprive us of our rights, lied to support illegal wars, pushed Cultural Marxism, thwarted the election process, and suppressed evidence of war crimes by the administration. THEN....the ones that are guilty should get a traitors punishment, and their families should have their assets confiscated for profiting off of R.I.C.O. crimes.
nikto2000 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nikto2000
"First thing after the revolution......all the media should be put on trial to determine if they were in collusion with the "regime" in Washington, to deprive us of our rights, lied to support illegal wars, pushed Cultural Marxism, thwarted the election process, and suppressed evidence of war crimes by the administration. THEN....the ones that are guilty should get a traitors punishment, and their families should have their assets confiscated for profiting off of R.I.C.O. crimes."
WashingtonEnema 1 month ago
@nikto2000 I agree!
WashingtonEnema 1 month ago
Comment removed
nikto2000 1 month ago
That's messed up everyone votes for Ron Paul and they split all his votes away to Gingrich and Rommey ... lol it's time for a new party Fuck the Democracts n Republicans
7within 1 month ago 11
@nicolaskids thats a pretty stupid thing to say. Its because we had money to go to war now we have negiative 15 trillion dollars in the bank and thats why he is agianst these unjust wars
The666Account 1 month ago
boy he beat the sht out of though didnt he... they all kept saying I agree with Paul, yeah I agree with Paul... I was screaming at the TV, yeah just drop out and endorse him already you fakes. I hope someone strings together all the I agree with Ron Paul moments. that would be powerful.
TheAntiPC 1 month ago
They are all liars except for Paul. He is still being blacked out.
bladeproject1 1 month ago
No, the MSM is ultimately responsible for his low polling in Florida. They ignore him in debates, then never mention him after the debate. As long as we use computers whose votes are tallied in secret, the current election system cannot be trusted, either. We need to find better ways to reach people. I believe it is happening on it's own. We just have no way of knowing how this battle will end right now.
wonderming1 1 month ago
wonder what the lame stream media is going to do when it's just Paul and Romney..gonna be hard to ignore him then!
MRsophacles 1 month ago
Least amount of time and still dominated. Go Ron!!!
tubeviewerX20 1 month ago
Ron Paul is getting smashed by the NWO owned media...his message is getting out here and there, but not to enough people...Im voting for him, he's America's last chance...
videolover61 1 month ago
@videolover61 Were rooting for Ron right out here in Aussie!
bullsnutsoz 1 month ago
well done! Posted this commentary at SGTreport. Keep up the good work. LIKED.
SGTbull07 1 month ago
He needs to Voice his opinion more. and get on Russia Today more.
RMUIR541 1 month ago
I like the idea of a write in but I would rather see Aron Paul third party run. If he doesn't run third party I will probably vote for Gary Johnson as the libertarian candidate. Ron is by far the best choice but Gary has a lot of the same ideas. Ron Paul first but Gary Johnson as a back up.
dan2avp1 1 month ago
I agree with your video. No more lesser evils. Going to write in.
Alienami 1 month ago
I knew it, they cut his time again.
chewbaca1989 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012!! Kiss ass SHEEPLE!
tpapi5 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul for President 2012 Restore America Now!!
annajanek1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul for President 2012 Restore America Now!!
annajanek1 1 month ago
Ron Paul for President 2012 Restore America Now!!
annajanek1 1 month ago
Ron Paul for President 2012 Restore America Now!!
annajanek1 1 month ago
AGREED. PAUL WILL BE WRITTEN IN FOR MY VOTE TOO. I BELIEVE PAUL ALREADY HAS SECURED A SAY SO FOR GOP. THE GOP IS CURRENTLY PLAYING ELIMINATION OF OTHER CANDIDATES.
CARODSLINK 1 month ago
Americas Corporate tax level is at 35%...
That's among the highest in the world. Canada brought theirs down to 16% imagine if we took it down to 0%-5% You'd have people around the world begging to open plants and businesses in America...
"Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure."
Tanarus20 1 month ago
One of my comments on Tweeter during the debate was "Anyone? When did Ron Paul become Pope Paul? and everyone now feels the need to kiss his ring? Kissing up to his supporters? him? "
I can see the bias on what questions are asked , how they are ask and Wolf cut Ron Paul off on his 2 first times speaking.
Santorum looked like the man on the "inside" with CNN. A cpl of his questions lead to Scripted responses. He had fake "anger" which was supposed to be "passion". Guess his acting needs work.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs That's because you don't make fun or get mad at the crazy uncle or senile grandpa while you are around them. You are cordial and when the evening is done, you and the other sane people then laugh all the way home .
WeknowhoUR 1 month ago
i think wolf blitzir treated ron paul fairly today. i felt like ron paul was not marginalized like in other debates
imamrauf 1 month ago
@imamrauf I somewhat agree but whoever comes up with the questions does so in a strategic manner as to leave Ron Paul out of it.
Why don't they ask Ron Paul about what he's currently doing in Congress instead of purposely asking questions that encourage Gingrich & Romney to battle.
The first half of the post-debate analysis was a joke as usual, only mentioning that Paul was "funny" followed by airing his bike race proposal while omitting the important question he was answering.
420premed 1 month ago
@imamrauf
Don't know which debate you were watching. Wolf cut Ron Paul off , the first 2 times he was speaking and tried to ask him loaded questions ,designed to leave a negative image in the viewers minds. Wolf is just another Criminal media schill ,that should be tried for Treason , like the rest of them.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
Soon, Americas financial situation will get sooo bad, people will DEMAND Ron Paul. Majority just haven't woken up yet as to how bad thing's are under the surface.
I'll write in Paul too. Knowing my vote went to America. Instead of insider trading corrupt 'establishment' politician.
Tanarus20 1 month ago
RONALD PAUL, in my opinion, would be the new "RONALD REAGAN" image that everybody's obsessing about. Its all comes down to Americans enlightening themselves via alternative media sources or sit like little kids in front of there TV's and be feed fairy tales like they were taught in public schools...Pro Reality Administration vs. Fairy Tale Administration....bottom line Ron Paul 2012
mymykatie1 1 month ago
I was watching it live on cnn.com and it magically cut out when ron paul was giving his response to the question of how each candidate's decisions in office would be influenced by their religion. Needless to say, I reconnected immediately to mitt romney responding. Hmmm.
ronpaulforlife1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Paul deserves .0001 of an hour. He's a presidential joke!
Ron Paul's foreign polidiocity summed up: "Mr. Akamanajinidab, please be nice to us:]. We will leave you alone. It's ok to blow up the only democracy in the mideast. We don't kare, cause we are isolationists. and we will dance in green fields of oil together while the black helicopters fly . . . tra la la la la . . . oh something something 'Constitution' .... I follow the Constitutions man, and Mr. Putin and Mr. Hu U should, too."
WeknowhoUR 1 month ago
@WeknowhoUR YOU should pay to police the world. The rest of us will keep our fucking money.
LoveSteroid 1 month ago
@WeknowhoUR wow you have such a good understanding of world affairs. wow maybe you should be president. That was a highly intelligent speech, well thought out, with lots of pertinent facts and expertly crafted. However it is past your bedtime and you dont want to be grumpy in the morning
MarshallLore 1 month ago
@WeknowhoUR: And how are you going to pay for this?
Deadwind002 1 month ago
Ron Paul gets screwed every time! The evil drone-puppets get more than enough time and RP gets snubbed! Nothing fair about politics... as they always act like little children.
margovallen 1 month ago
Ron Paul is underestimated on purpose and he's the only one speaking TRUTH!!!
lorrainegate 1 month ago
Actually, I thought Wolfe Blitzer was more fair than any of the other moderators. Lots of bickering between Newt & Mitt which takes up more time, but I see as a negative. Santorum...warmonger!
RON PAUL 2012
kendallred5 1 month ago
@kendallred5
Yes, it was more fair than others.
Kimberlyalmond 1 month ago
im from ireland and the coverage on the news is all but ron paul and likewise the british media, totally shunnin him,fkn rotten!! ,wish shpll in the us would wtfu!
wotsgonon1 1 month ago
@wotsgonon1
I saw 1 vid that said there was a media blackout ordered by Obama. I haven't looked into it. It would explain the other vid that was talking about a media blackout of Ron Paul and to list the country if it was happening where you are. There were a lot of countries reporting that there was , in fact , a blackout of Ron Paul.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
"President Paul, the president of Cuba is on the phone"
Paul: "Hi. Why did you call?"
This is what he said. This is the extent of his foreign policy knowledge. America needs a bit more than this in a president. Yes he got a reaction from the crowd. They were laughing.
Billthesheepdog 1 month ago
@Billthesheepdog And your type of leader would say what?
Bulbakip 1 month ago
@Billthesheepdog
I beleive he said quite clearly that he would work with them.
Kimberlyalmond 1 month ago
@Billthesheepdog That is because he wants to lift sanctions and trade. Putting embargoes on Cuba has done nothing but create animosity towards the US by the Cuban people.
ElAsaltaCulos2 1 month ago
@Billthesheepdog
Ron Paul was pointing out the idiocy of the question , not to mention that it was an attempt at a fictional loaded question. I guess you are a good little sheeple and didn't notice.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs is that your answer for everything he does? He said that because he doesn't intend on having ANY foreign policy. None. He intends on becoming isolationist and just appeasing our enemies like Chamberlin did in London before WW2. "Mind our own business and the bad people will ignore us". Never will work and never has. He is a straw man only so you have a distraction. The sad population doesn't care about the constitution any more. They are all numb
Billthesheepdog 1 month ago
@Billthesheepdog
You are either a schill ,Ignorant (about Ron Paul policy ,because you are wrong an uninformed) or brainwashed by the media.
I was going to address everyone of your statements , but they are so ludicrous ,they don't deserve an informed explanation. Look up the word Isolationist , stop being Ignorant. I like your idea that punishing a whole contries peoples will somehow punish the Leader. If it works within the first cpl years , yes. AFTER 50 ,its not working.
YouAreOneOfUs 1 month ago
@YouAreOneOfUs The people get the leasers they deserve. Just as Ben Franklin used to say "Those who give up liberty for safety deserve neither" America is sick with sin. Until it repents of that sin it will continue to be sick and will die. Who the republican nominee is will not matter a bit. I fought and was injured for my country in war so have the right to say that this is not the country I fought for, It is sick with sin and is dying. Ron Paul can't stop that.
Billthesheepdog 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seems like the media are trying to steal time for the newt and romney show arguing about who is the most immoral and corrupt - romney seemed to get the loudest cheers with his demagoging i just dont understand how people can believe such utter obvious lies - i like newts plan for the moon base ron paul should take it on with the plan to pay for it being AN INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL MOON BASE PAID FOR BY ALL COUNTRIES WAR AND WEAPONS BUDGET - probly would have got booed by the republican morons
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012!Anyone saying different is either ill informed or basically retarded.RETARDED=SHEOPLE!
DEADPATRIOT1 1 month ago
Comment removed
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 month ago
Ron Paul is being ignored, same black out, only fair and balanced in the Orwellian sense. Nothing new under the sun.
hellsunicorn 1 month ago
on twitter your videos are gold
libertarianwarbook 1 month ago 4
@libertarianwarbook lol are they really? i havent really spent much time on twitter but im glad they post on there haha. thanks for checking out the videos! GO RON PAUL!!!
matlarson10 1 month ago 6