Added: 5 years ago
From: rhawk301
Views: 62,418
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (378)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Proofs absolutely nothing. My Camera in 2001 was Sony FD series with less than 1 Megapixel resolution, slow shutter. Try to shoot anything with it going at 400 knots. You'll get nothing but the blur. Standard security cameras probably had far less than that.

  • This video looks as if half the frames are missing!

  • @MDalfig There are no "missing" frames. It is just low res camera with slow shutter speed and low frame rate. Typical for all 2001 security cameras.

  • @Stealth9331 Well if you did any kind of research you would know that the boeing that "crashed" in to the pentagon wasn't a 757-200ER it was a 757-223. And even if you were correct a 757-200ER doesn't have a pointed cockpit.

  • If you still think it was a plane then you might as well call yourself a shit factory with a non functional brain. Don't be a sheep and realize what's happening

  • dont see a plane sorry, I was really looking for one..

  • Guys, just ask the EYE WITNESSES what they saw. They all say plane. Im stickin with them

  • @PHILLYPHAN5118109 Too bad a camera and the FACTS say otherwise, Money makes you see shit you don't really see.

  • Only thing I have seen is the police car.

  • No missile explodes like that, in a huge fireball; people who think otherwise have seen too many action movies.. That's fuel going up, not high explosives, Check out the brief video "Cruise Missile Journey to Impact" here on YT to see what it would have looked like had a missile really hit.

  • Its so funny to me that people believe that a plan hit the pentagon. The video speaks for itself cmon people really. There was no plane!!!

  • I'm an engineer. An airliner can't go 500 miles an hour unless 45degrees of steeper. Max speed at thick air of sea level is about 300 miles an hour with any control at all. That is why they go almost straight up when taking off. That is why they fly at 30 grand or higher in the thin atmosphere. I saw pics from right when it happened. NOT one piece of debris on the field. NOT ONE. hahahha. You are a shill because no one could be that slow headed and still be able to type.

  • thanks for showing this vid. NOW I'm certain it was inside job. This removes all doubt. Jet engines don't leave white plume trails. A drone did this. The missle left the white plume. Notice the fireball went up and NO more fire. Just black smoke, just like a missle. hahhahhha. This is great. Now we all know it was an inside job. My idiot brotherinlaw used to think it was official story, until I just showed him. He apologized and now knows also it was inside job. You can see the drone

  • Wtf? So obviousely it was an inside job because of this? fuck you

  • if you pause at 3:58 you can see a grey missle like shape on the right.

  • all the vids are tampured with..

  • ok go to 1:56 and on the far right side in the middle where the grey object came from a black thinner object apears.. just wondering what you guys think it is?!

  • so wheres the plane?? and ppl

  • And what is that 'thing' that suddenly emerges (oddly in the same way as the other) on the middle right hand side of the screen @ 3:02 and backs out by 3:04. Another photo-shop fart, perhaps?

    I remember this vid...especially because when it was first shown to the public, the film date on the screen was Sept. 12.

    Fuck off, Pentagon liars. We know what Global Guardian was, now....

  • of course its not a plane! but what the hell are you gonna do about it? thats what i thought. absolutely fucking nothing!

  • there is no way that that is a plane!!

  • THERE'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT JUST ONE CAMERA FILM THAT tragic evenement... This is the PENTAGON, not a night shop... Where are the others videos???

  • ya good point

  • So almost 136 who were near the pentagon don,t think it was a missile where you around the pentagon that day

  • I wonder why you will not zoom in for us? and don,t say you can,t cause i,ve seen others and it didn,t look much like a missile also lots of people saw a plane and nobody saw a missile so nobody who were round the pentagon belief it was a missile, also the investigators it made sense to them it was a plane and they did find engines also forensics the people on flight 77 were identified so forensics don,t think it was a missile .

  • They didnt find engines they didnt find anything! they have no wings, no seats no wheels nothing.- no proof of plane. i think your wrong on this. you would be able to see a huge 757 flying into a building on the videos. the thing you do see is a little grey cilender take off and explode! into the building. plus a 757s explosion would be twice the size of that are you kidding me. Do you know how much fuel is in a 757.. 11489 gallons! jet fuel is crazy even more explosive that regular gasoline.

  • @blancheddacheese15 Well first of all the claim they did not find any wreckage is just a lie just type up flight 77 wreckage on google there is wreckage.And the jet fuel went into the building thats why you don,t see it from the outside if you think thats not true type up,man burned in the pentagon crash pushes through the rehabilation process part 1,he sure remembers jet fuel coming in the building,and the reason u don,t see the plane is cause it was going in at 500 miles a hour this was taking

  • @wllmdnldsn A Boeing 757 doing 500 miles an hour sliding across the lawn? Leaving NO tracks? Ripping five light poles out of the ground before performing that nice slide into the wall of the Pentagon? Really? Someone's gotta be kidding me.

  • @Funkadelic2 Well it's only the truthers that say it slided across the lawn and there was marks on the ground

    I would prefer it if you would put that tenacity into finding out why the fdr was not given to the ntsb

    but if you wish to put that tenacity into theorys that have very weak evidence to back them up that's fine.

  • @wllmdnldsn I'm not quite sure what post you're refer to here, but your choice of words make me a bit uncomfortable. One thing: I hope you don't refer to me as a "truther". I'm just a person who states my mind. What initially got me interested in 9/11 was the case of WTC 7, and then I ran across the surveillance cam clips of the Pentagon crash and the wide flow of theories linked to all the events of 9/11 that is flooding the internet. So, since I don't know, why was the FDR not given to NTSB..?

  • you are full of shit! I've never seen any "truther" say that, you lying sack of shit. The official pentagon story is total bullshit.....there were at least 6 cameras on the attack side of the pentagon on 9/11. ...not only were there 6 cameras on the outside of the pentagon, there are cameras on the inside of the pentagon. Where the fuck are the tapes? ....there's even videos showing evidence being planted at the pentagon. 9/11 = Inside Job! ,,,and you are full of shit!

  • @Born2Flesh Yeah and you've gave me a very mature answer.Fuck of you immature twofer you are full of shit you think dropping cardboard boxes simulates steal frame structural failure? how people can follow this is beyond me,any way you're clearly that sort who is just too full of rage and childish attitude to even talk to so there's no chance of being rational with you.So consider yourself blocked you stupid twofer.

  • @blancheddacheese15 pics at 1 per second and if you are wondering why they confiscated the cameras that captured it,well what is the pentagon? its the heart of the USA,s defence so for them to show a plane hitting the heart of Americas defence that they could not stop is considered as disgraceful thats why they will not show a plane hitting it.

  • Why should I believe this POS video over others I have seen with the plane in it?

  • @RUDEGOOD Are you blind? Do you not understand basic physics?

    Who needs to be an expert? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to keep in mind that out of all 87 security cameras on that side of the Pentagon, only 1 camera captured five frames of film.

    Can you identify a plane in those 5 frames of film?

  • @MrRichardKranium

    No you cannot, its is so much bollocks, QED the music.

  • good song

  • just like a fiddle.the enlightened ones have blatantly fucked the world in its backside and most people dont want to take off there blinkers and help fight,or deal with the illuminati.its only gonna get worse.

  • remember friends. People who defend that lie the gov put out are our enemy. Nobody could be this stupid not to see it was a global hawk or something tiny. The plane flew for hour and forty minutes and didn't get tracked by military and the anti aircraft automatic transponder activateds were stood down too.They won't show any photo or vid worth a shoot. Watch, the pentagon bullshit. and you'll see. Remember, they are our mortal enemy. They murdered and robbed us. And we paid for the trolls

  • 757 my ass That looked more like a mosquito in comparison to a 757

  • the american government is responsible for the attacks. there is just too much inconclusive evidence. i agree with "VENDARK" where is the proof. what is that explosion before the planes hit the towers. the fox reporter even said the plane looked different to a commercial plane. why did they only air that once. all the americans wanted was the oil to help a falling economy. its not the first time the american government has caused a diaster of this magnitude to help there economy.

  • So if a plane didn't hit the Pentagon then where did it go? Mexico? You truthers are mentally unstable.

  • @DanSa25 Did that look like the nose of a 757 to you? Not sure where the plane went, if they'd do this they may have killed them too, but half the authors of the official conspiracy theory (911 commission report) say there was a cover up They even received a request from the white house to make changes in it before release.Bush n Cheney also refused to be interviewed separately by the commission.Destroyed evidence too. Fascism sucks n the US shows most of the 14 defining characteristics of it.

  • i'm getting tired of you fucking assholes what are you saying that the hijacked plane wasnt reely hijacked it just never existed at all wtf? if it was a missile than what happened to the plane huh? i guess the government shot it down right... fuck all of you bitches

  • @PhillyBoy264 The main thing people are saying is that there need to be a real investigation instead of the bs report that even half the authors of say it was a cover up. Nobody knows for sure what happened but not all of us are so ignorant to believe such a blatant lie. Some people are a bit out there but a real n independent investigation would put it to rest mostly and get those responsible for our government's failure to react accountable. They should hang like the traitors they are

  • @PhillyBoy264 Simple really, They're support Islam, pedophila and the barbaric laws they want to impose on you (Whether they knowingly do that is another thing)

    Try asking the TRUE religion of these conspiracy theorists and also how much cash they make for trying to show us the truth

  • Major fail at 14 seconds for the arrow pointing underneath the airplane. Smart one guys. whats next?...lasers hit the towers?

  • Sorry but no Boeing 757 struck this building. If it did there would be debris as far as the eye can see, and there wasn't. There was an American Airlines 757 that crashed in the mountains in Columbia and left behind alot more debris than if one crashed into the Pentagon. There were even four survivors in the Columbia crash and that plane would certainly be traveling faster than if one hit the Pentagon for sure. So fact ! The US gov't FAILED on this stage act !

  • The FBI confiscated 84 security cameras around the pentagon, and only released 5 frames of film to the public. These 5 frames....

  • @MrRichardKranium

    !!!THIS!!!

  • @KinGAhmet22 ??this??

  • oh! come on that was know airplane wake up!! the video proves it

  • The aircraft was traveling at over 750 feet per second and the camera was recording at 1 frame per second. And you expect to see a clear view of an aircraft? Get a clue people...

  • @jamesjr934 YOU NEED TO GET A CLUE . LOOK AT THE PEOPLE WITH STORE BOUGHT VIDEO CAMERAS RECORDING PLANES BREAKING THE SOUND BARRIER . I THINK THE PENTAGON BEING THE MOST PROTECTED PLACE IN THE U.S WOULD SURELY HAVE CAMERAS BETTER THAN WE IMAGINE BUT WE SHALL LEAVE IT TO PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO TELL IT. HEY DID I MENTION THAT THE PENTAGON WOULD RECORD VIDEOS LIKE A BANK WOULD BUT MORE ACURATE. THEY HAVE CAMERAS AT EVERY ANGLE . INCOMING COULD GRAB IT NO PROBLEM . STR8 FORWARD HEAD ON

  • @tayopic

    You would expect cameras everywhere, but none of really know if that's the case or not. Btw, cap lock doesn't help get your point across any better, just makes you look like an asshole.

  • @jamesjr934 no one would be stupid to not know that about the most secured place in the U.S. doesnt have cameras all the way around it . ya know whats even funnier is that they have a f4 phantom jet hitting a wall from a still sideway angle and the plane was going 500 mph but the side view of the one hitting the pentagon shows nothing and i know for a fact that the pentagon wouldnt be stupid enough to have cameras that don't record or cameras from k-mart. come on now people get real

  • Post 1/3

    lrn2framerate.

    You see the nose of the plane enter from the right but you're not taking into account the framerate of the camera, and figuring that the plane is traveling at an estimated speed of 480mph (FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY MILES PER HOUR) Do you even understand how fast that is?!?!?

  • @whitephatt what i dont git is how u fly that fast that low and not hit the ground

  • Post 2/3

    1 mile is 5280 feet, and at 480mph that plane is covering 2,534,400 feet per hour. Divide that by 60 and you get 42,240 feet a minute, divide that by 60 again and you get 704 feet per second. PER SECOND. If the camera is only catching 4 frames a second and an object is moving at 704 feet a second the discrepancy in the movement of the object is about 176 feet. If it's only catching 3 frames a second the discrepancy of the moving object drops to 234 feet.

  • Post 3/3

    That's plenty of time for the plane to make it from right to left without being captured.

  • that music does not suit the vid.. i cud only watch/listen to 20seconds

  • The only device I have ever seen that blows up AFTER it penatrates any structure is a missle. Planes tend to explode on impact, not AFTER impact..

  • What plane have you ever watched fly into a building besides the ones on 9/11? Yeah, but your the expert...

  • @iloveheartyloaf I'm sorry, but I have to ask......Are you blind?

  • @MrRichardKranium definately a plane it explodes on impact you can still see it in the frame after it first enters the screen

  • @USMCE2Z You can see a plane in the only 5 frames of film that was released?

    It's too bad that the other 84 security cameras on that side of the pentagon didn't get anything to confirm that.

  • @MrRichardKranium You realize that all the stuff in the plane that would explode (the fuel) is located in the wings dont you? sheet metal doesnt explode

  • @Chenstrapftw What wings?

  • @MrRichardKranium The wings on a boeing 757. There would be no explosion until the fuel is ignited. Metal doesnt explode. Take an airplane with no fuel and droop it from 10,000 ft up. there would be no explosion. all the fuel is located in the wings of a boeing 757 so there would be no explosion until the wings contact the building

  • @Chenstrapftw Do you see a boeing 757 in the 5 frames of film. You can argue about the engineering physics of plane crashes all you want. Prove to me you see a plane, keep in mind that out of all 87 security cameras on that side of the Pentagon, only 1 camera captured five frames of film.

    Can you identify a plane in those 5 frames of film?

  • @MrRichardKranium You show me a missle? all you see is the tip of an aircraft. And the fact is, a missle wouldnt have knocked doown all the light postslike the Boeing 757 that hit the pentagon did.

  • @Chenstrapftw A missle? no. A bunker bust? yes. Missle or 757, which one would leave wreckage... hmm... You really don't need to be a rocket scintist to figure it out. But you go ahaed a see what you want to see.

  • @Chenstrapftw

    How the heck can anyone fly a 757 that close to the ground & not hit it?

    & if the 757 hit any thing before it hit the pentagon, it would have been a rolling crash already in progress.

    a 757 doesn't have a pointy nose, like the 'plane' in this pic

  • @Zapppo My point is is that a missle would NOT have been large enough to take ot all of those light posts.

    Also, the plane came in at an angle, its possible that were seeing the wingtip of the right side of the aircraft (if i remember the angle it came in correctly)

  • @Chenstrapftw What light posts were taken out? Please direct me to your info as, the info I saw said no light posts were taken out at all around the pentagon. Also, if a plane did hit light posts, the plane would have left a wing or a part of it behind, yet I haven't seen a single photo of plane wreckage from the Pentagon incident at all. Thanks.

  • @Zapppo Indeed. It's said to have ripped five light poles OUT OF THE GROUND before performing that nice slide across the lawn too! Ridiculous.

  • @MrRichardKranium

    I suppose im supposed to believe you're some sort of expert in these sorts of things. You stupid stupid people.

  • @MrRichardKranium totally false!

  • @kevinfay94 Too bad you are the only one who thinks that, how's it feel being in the minority?

  • this film, you could of seen a fucking motorcycle at 200 mph going through that frame, why no footage of jets crashing out of bldg. tires bouncing, the tail section sheering left as it slides through, no fucking 350 foot airliner at all, where are all the cell phone pics, where did the jet rims go, the jets, the tire, NO DeBRIS PICS, a jet crashes, they piece it back together in hangers and find the wires that caused the crash. blind fucking conspirators that are nephilim blood are the DOUBTERS!

  • the reward the government gets, is its all bloodlines that win, the nephilim bloodline seizes earth from God, then tries to exterminate the non polluted normal humans that aren't sons of cain, Canaanite seed-line, they think they can beat God, but the ARMAGEDDON is God destroying the demon seedline.. CrAzY But FUCKING TRUE!! they didn't believe Noah either, you sleepy content believers in God has no game plan, and niether does Satan are gonna be CraZy ShOckEd

  • "My father worked for NSA and I have been through many "debriefings." There are cameras everywhere"

    You've already established yourself as a complete bullshitter, you pathetic teenage fuck. You can't even get the terminology right, but expect us to believe you get classified info because Daddy worked for NSA (sweeping the floors?).

    There are 8 million photos of the Pentagon just on GoogleImage. Now link us to some (or even one) that shows any of these invisible cameras you babble about.

  • Hey guys i want to make a little contes on what is going to be the next 9/11 so US can itack Iran?? Will it be a shoping mall bombing?? Or maby a little nuclear atack on Kansas?? The award is ...well there is no award

  • @F1brawfa well, obama just announced we can "absorb" another attack.

  • Howard Stern was right

  • lol

  • This footage could have been edited down to about 30 seconds. Nice rock video, but WAY too much dead air between blasts.

  • dosent it also figure you'de have hundreds of witnessess seeing the fucking jet liner comming in..

  • @eternalblackproject1 "you'de have hundreds of witnessess seeing the fucking jet liner comming in.."

    Yup. And there ARE hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw the plane coming in, many of them specifically ID'ing it as an American Airlines 757 -- including professional pilots & an air controller at the Pentagon.

    Doesn't make any difference to the conspiracy fruits -- they are so emotionally disturbed that eyewitnesses don't count at all, so they keep believing in their little missile fairy tales.

  • cruise

  • thats no way a 757..i have flown on them many times and if you freeze frame..you can easily see that the nose of this object is pointed not round like the jets nose..makes you think!

  • i find the bright white flash and flame @ 1:49 interesting because jet fuel burns orange and only a missile would flash in that way

  • if you pause it right as you see the start of the white puff at 3:59 in the video, ahead of it, right above the right booth in the foreground, you can see the tale off the plane sticking up. the white puff is not the airplane but the dust stirred up as the plane flew by the ground. pull your heads out of your ass and look around on the internet, you CAN find pictures of airplane debris at the pentagon. including a nice picture of part of the aluminum frame on the pentagon lawn.

  • FINAL PROOF(if u need it) watch **911 cruise missile vs pentagon** Still have doubts?

  • u do kno@least 2 frames r missing rite

  • That's not a plane............

  • A big as plane crashed into the building get over it. their is no dubree because the plane was almost dueing mock one so if u dont beleive what they say were did all the moms dads children go that were onthat plane because i want to know were they sent them because i want to go!!!F*** the people how think it was a bomb or a missial from Bumfuck,TX

  • @GamerGEEK771 well think of it this way theres area 51 a place privately for the government to land aircraft there and NORAD did nothing to stop it.So basically if your asking where the 2 missing planes are,there at area 51 other than that tell the government to give us back the video from the gas station and the hotel and will see whos right k (:

  • It's funny how in none of these videos can you actually make out a 757?? i could accept the truth either way but the fact remains that you can't prove that a jumbo jet hit this building with any of these videos. Because of the speed in which it hit, it looked more like a rocket.

  • "in none of these videos can you actually make out a 757"

    Big surprise -- how many surveillance cameras can clearly show something traveling by at the speed of a .45 caliber bullet?

    Figure out the frame rate and do the math, you moron.

  • Hey, no need to get personal. I am not a moron and as a matter of fact, the speed of a .45 caliber bullet is approximately 600 miles per hour and according to some expert engineers, you can't fly a 757 at 600 miles per hour under 700 feet without it structurally failing. My point was that you can see airplanes hitting the world trade center but I have never seen any footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon. If you have, please show it to me. Thanks!

  • ....and besides, morons are the ones who don't ask the hard questions and who just take the government and media answers as the final word. Think for yourself!

  • @MsgtSpook they have camereas looking at the sky . u would be able to see it approaching

  • why did the pilot decide to hit that particular side of the pentagon when he could have gone right through the front door?

  • no plane.... thats bull

  • "Don't you clowns ever check any of that crap you read on crackpot websites?"

    The short answer is ... NO.

    Truthers never check any of that crap. They're either too stupid to use Google, or they just refuse to believe anything that doesn't appear on PrisonPlanet or Loose Change, Moron Edition.

  • @ChopperSix the pentagon IS the most surveyed builing in the country , THERE ARE cameras covering every inch of the property and surrounding areas on land AND air to watch for attacks . . why then kind sir is this THE ONLY film they release??? let us see the terrible terrosts approaching the building!!! THAT A FUCKIN MISSLE

  • "he pentagon IS the most surveyed builing in the country , THERE ARE cameras covering every inch"

    And where did you hear that?

    At least 50,000 people drive right by the Pentagon every day, and you can't even find ONE person who has even seen these invisible cameras?

    And not one single employee who has ever seen them?

    You're a moron, and everyone knows you're just pulling this out of your well-stretched asshole.

  • @oiyabastard show me the plane fuck face. ps bill pitney gargles balls

  • My father worked for NSA and I know for a fact these government buildings have cameras everywhere. You're the retard!

  • @openmindednessessary u read the wrong message yo .

  • Its a CONSPIRACY!

    Roxorsboxors!

  • It's something other than the whole truth, that's for sure!

  • serves um right

  • thats some really dark smoke kinda like a bunch of jet fuel burning and it started smoking so fast like a second after impact

  • i belive it was a smart bomb u know those bombs can single out just the building next door n have it be totaly gone when the building next to it was never touched

  • laughable farce. tons of cameras monitor this building TONS OF THEM and yet all we see are hoky clipped sections of their missile's work. HA HA new world order wins first hand.

  • "tons of cameras monitor this building"

    Conspiracy assholes have been trying for years to show that there was even ONE more camera there -- and are still failing miserably.

    Because there weren't any, as the hundreds of thousands of employees, ex-employees and visitors already know.

    Mainly because they serve absolutely no purpose at a bldg where the public can already get inside from a Metro stop, and there's a public shopping mall INSIDE that building.

    Never been there, have you?

  • and i have been there.

  • You're sure are a Crack! My father worked for NSA and I have been through many "debriefings." There are cameras everywhere in these secure buildings. This is the United States Pentagon with the largest military budget in the world and they only have one camera? Give me a break!

  • of course it was a plane. there are people with relatives a friends who got on that plane so they must know that it was a plane that hit the pentagon.

  • @Dgamer21

    nope. the actual plane that was hijacked did not hit the pentagon. of course nobody know where it is now but it's probably somewhere in the middle of the ocean

  • Its the bubbleing effect of the camera. This is seen by a police car shown earlier in the full video

  • then how does the street lights been knocked down. all 3 of em. Right near the Pentagon? one simple missile couldn't have knocked them all down... i think a small plane did....

  • Um... strange thing is... no aircraft was allowed to flight in any of those areas, they would of have been shot down almost immediately even before 9/11 attacks happened, but the airforce was conducting an air drill more than 50 miles away. Even then, if that was a missile, the pentagon wouldn't stand a chance against most missiles. Any missile that's guided is considered leaving a huge mess. Unless... that was an UAV. UAVs could be equipped with a small incendiary explosive.

    That's what it is.

  • "no aircraft was allowed to flight in any of those areas"

    Bullshit. That area was NEVER restricted before 9-11.

    Don't you clowns ever check any of that crap you read on crackpot websites?

    Here's the FAA map of the DC area, showing that only the Mall & WH areas are restricted.

    tinyurl (dot) com/lzg62o

    They don't shoot down violators, either. Never in history. They just evacuate. Shit, one small Cessna crashed into the White House back in '94.

  • I think the helical exhaust pattern has to be an effect of engine thrust angle servos. For one thing, fixed-mount turbine engines don't impart significant spin into the exhaust because they work by having the air spin the turbine, not the other way around. On freezing the turbine while in-flight there shouldn't be a pattern like that because the exhaust port is far too small for such a supposedly-large helix, for one thing.

  • how come we can clearly make out a plane in the tower crash but not this one? And I would think their survelance cameras would be better.

  • Yea, I'm sure the government would release a video showing a missle hit the pentagon and not a plane when they said it was a plane.

  • Look at 3.59...........a white streak appears from the right hand side of the screen just below a black dome shape at the top of the taller right hand square shaped pillar...........That's what hits the building and there is NO way that is a Plane.............!!!!!!!.....­......No way........!!!!!

  • fuck the pentagon

  • Wow. You'd expect one of the most secured places in the world to have some of the best cameras in the world with sound...

  • @BarricadeSlade, Exactly!

  • @BarricadeSlade

    Well maybe if they were expecting it, as many are suggesting, they would have put up a high speed camera to pick up the aircraft that was moving at over 750 feet per second. Keep in mind that this footage was recorded at 1 frame per second, making it very unlikely to pick up an object moving at over 750 feet per second.

  • CIA/Cheney/Bush implemented their diabolical plan. We must ensure our military is not taking orders from traitors

  • BLAGASPANTS, gosh, its a police car. look at 2.59-3.04, how stupid can you get.

  • this really proves that 9/11 is a lie!

  • I used to dismiss the other stories as bullshit, but this is something to think about.

    I doesn't fell nice that the government may be lying to all of us, but overwhelming evidence has to be delt with.

  • I've spent the past four years researching the events before, during, and after 911 and because my son 'spouted off' that the gov't was behind it. I'm ex-Army Intel and was offended - SO, I was going to discredit his remarks... ... ...

    Ouch! I have only uncovered HUNDREDS of credible sources confirming and proving that our gov't orchestrated EVERY event on 911 and hundreds of people are BILLIONAIRES as a result. More continue to make millions every day on the blood of our soldiers. Tell all!

  • oh my fucking god! (qui n'existe pas)

    It looks like a fucking missle! Why have I never heard about this before? It doesn't look like an airlane!

    My old view of 9/11 is shattered.

  • good god man its just a white thingy might be the planes wing crashing in to the ground before it hit the pentagon

  • yes the planes wing hit the ground at 400 mph and came back up into the air and struck the tower without leaving any debris to be seen.... You know you would have expected something to actually have came off the plane.

    And what about the 5 lights it struck coming over the motorway (Why the turn to that approach anyways), when it took only one to bring down a plane picking up bush?

  • Misile

  • biggest insurance job in american history..... fuk it... blow it up and get a new one..

  • That's also the world's fastest travelling 757...

  • Yeah man! And that tape recording at 5 frames per minute is amazing, it's fucking logical you can't see a fuck on a blurry fucked up video, look at the delays between the explosion which explains WHY you don't see a plain on the video, the video didn't record it good.

  • I love the song. Does anybody know the name of it and who sings it?

  • its "What would you do" by Paris

  • ministry, new world order

  • who here is a lefty?

  • Smoking Hot Video - ? - Inside Insurance Job - .....Job Well Done,thx america

  • They first said it was a private jet (Fox News NH 9/11), now when did they change their minds that it was a 757?

    Someone needs to find all the descriptions from every news channel station, you'll get different descriptions.

    I know we got rockets with wings but you can friggen tell a difference between the rocket and a 757 aircraft.

  • At 500MPH at ground level it could be difficult to tell, but the ting that bothers me most with these videos, and the second one shows it best at 3:59 is the object (whatever it is) comes into view on the right side, the very next frame (Still at 3:59 going to 4:00) the object is in full view, but the explosion is ahead of it? I saw this on the original video released by judicialwatch so I know it wasn't altered in this one.

  • Speaking of ground level, the flightpath is almost flat. So if the 10000 feet/min decline were resulting in the 500MPH my question is: How long a distance did the plane have to flatten out?

    ALSO, take a look at the lower left corner of the video, just after the impact. Is that the supposed missile defence, a little too late??

  • Sorry, lower left corner of the building ;)

  • ZEIGEIST watch it

  • here's something to think about. All the planes where the same type right? Why then does this one explode and flame out in matter of seconds and the 2 WTC planes fuel burn on longer? They were all suppose to be transcontinental flights w loads of fuel.

  • paid witnesses