Empress Stone-Coated Non-Stick Frying Pan.flv

[weirdyoda04]

I want to try this but there is a lot of misleading statements so it makes me weary. For example, "You wouldn't do this with your nonstick pan would you?" as he shakes rocks around in it. Well the answer is no, of course not, but how is that relevant in any way? Like selling a bathtub and saying, "You wouldn't drown your children would you? Well this tub makes them super clean!" They never even said sloshing rock around wouldn't hurt it only that you wouldn't do it with your own pans.

[GhostPirate6]

What was the "premium" nonstick coating used? With only 25,000 abrasions, it doesn't sound that premium to me.

[mike60014]

@GhostPirate6 actually it says it withstands 50,000

[GhostPirate6]

@mike60014 Even though they said 50,000 the video shows a regular pan losing it's coating at 2,500. Ten times 2,500 isn't 50,000, that's 20 times, which is what they should've said. Seems kind of misleading. That and Chef Nick Stellino once sold cookware that had titanium mixed in with the nonstick coating which withstood over 400,000 scrubs. Still better than traditional teflon though.

[mike31jmb]

@GhostPirate6 You missed the key word, they said it had been proven to "resist" 50,000. They never claimed that it worked, lol.

[GhostPirate6]

@mike31jmb That doesn't make sense. Proven to resist 50,000 but never claiming that it worked? Think about it. If they claimed it but never proved it, then it makes sense. You can claim without proof but you can't prove without claiming it first.

[mike31jmb]

@GhostPirate6 It's the same as saying a watch is water "resistant" to whatever meters, and not saying it's water proof. Resistant releases the makers if anything goes wrong, hence they are not liable.