@sargoth37 - Brother or not, attorney general not, play out the scenario: The president of the United States, arguably the most powerful and influential man on the planet, has just been murdered. Do you think that anyone, regardless of position, would have been allowed even the option, to remove material evidence? To what end? And why leave the bloody clothes and all else, and just take the brain? I don't buy it. It also would show the tract of the bullet(s). RFK would know that.
@beaviselectron I'm not sure what you're saying. LBJ had the secret service clean Connally's clothes and the limo, destroying evidence. Lifton and many others including me, now believe the body was taken out of the casket and his wounds changed to remove evidence of bullets from the front etc. The facts are the x-rays and photos that are available don't match what the Parkland doctors saw or each other. They are conclusively fake. The real photos and x-rays and brain are missing.
@sargoth37 - No, no, Sargoth, we agree on these basic points. I was disagreeing with those who attempt to dismiss the discrepencies in the brain data, and the loss of the brain itself, as being the result of efforts and/or results by RFK to retrieve the brain itself so it was not a morbid item later. RFK would NOT have EVER done such a thing when he knew that would impede the investigation, esp when the autopsy was done the night of the assassination. No questions photos and x-rays were fake.
I always noticed that when people talk and shut their eyes, they are trying not to look at people as they lie. I notice this with Louis Farrkahan on some issues.
While I believe in conspiracy, I do find it strange that they have gone from "shot from the front" to "a shot from the front and back at the same time." To me it does not matter if it was a shot from the front or all from the back - it does not dismiss conspiracy.
Unfortunately for Fetzer, he has completely underminded his yeomans work with the Kennedy assassination, which I believe is legitimate, with the inane and flat out comedic nonsense of his 9/11 work. He's lost all credibility with free thinking people even though he's close to the truth with the Kennedy assassination.
What a shill. JFK was murdered by the female sitting next to him. Watch the video carefully. Easy to see.
lblmer 5 months ago
that is not jfks skull at the beginning. u cant even see the bottom
drifter402 6 months ago
was tippit a body double, they shot him because his head looked like JFK's ?
optionsupdate 9 months ago
i tend to think the entry wound was from the left side of the head ...
dvdgzzrll 9 months ago
The government would certainly try to cover up something they were involved in.
Meisteria 10 months ago
excuse me he is not an agent but simply a moron
he has 3 videos of kittens and that's it!
dieyoubastards 1 year ago
@dieyoubastards but he callls a PHD in science an idiot!
dieyoubastards 1 year ago
what an idiot. read reclaiming history.
theedrstrangelove 1 year ago
@theedrstrangelove yeah read the official bullshit story says the disinfo agent!
dieyoubastards 1 year ago
what an idiot.
theedrstrangelove 1 year ago
They never describe the top of jfk's head. Also did Rfk realy have jfk's brain removed? Or did the gov. do it to hide the facts of his wounds?
sargoth37 1 year ago
@sargoth37 - Brother or not, attorney general not, play out the scenario: The president of the United States, arguably the most powerful and influential man on the planet, has just been murdered. Do you think that anyone, regardless of position, would have been allowed even the option, to remove material evidence? To what end? And why leave the bloody clothes and all else, and just take the brain? I don't buy it. It also would show the tract of the bullet(s). RFK would know that.
beaviselectron 1 year ago
@beaviselectron I'm not sure what you're saying. LBJ had the secret service clean Connally's clothes and the limo, destroying evidence. Lifton and many others including me, now believe the body was taken out of the casket and his wounds changed to remove evidence of bullets from the front etc. The facts are the x-rays and photos that are available don't match what the Parkland doctors saw or each other. They are conclusively fake. The real photos and x-rays and brain are missing.
sargoth37 1 year ago
@sargoth37 - No, no, Sargoth, we agree on these basic points. I was disagreeing with those who attempt to dismiss the discrepencies in the brain data, and the loss of the brain itself, as being the result of efforts and/or results by RFK to retrieve the brain itself so it was not a morbid item later. RFK would NOT have EVER done such a thing when he knew that would impede the investigation, esp when the autopsy was done the night of the assassination. No questions photos and x-rays were fake.
beaviselectron 1 year ago
I always noticed that when people talk and shut their eyes, they are trying not to look at people as they lie. I notice this with Louis Farrkahan on some issues.
n0gar 1 year ago
While I believe in conspiracy, I do find it strange that they have gone from "shot from the front" to "a shot from the front and back at the same time." To me it does not matter if it was a shot from the front or all from the back - it does not dismiss conspiracy.
n0gar 1 year ago
Unfortunately for Fetzer, he has completely underminded his yeomans work with the Kennedy assassination, which I believe is legitimate, with the inane and flat out comedic nonsense of his 9/11 work. He's lost all credibility with free thinking people even though he's close to the truth with the Kennedy assassination.
squirevet 2 years ago
2:08 Kilduff pointing with his right hand to his right side of the head.
imo if Kilduff would have been lefthander (is he ?) he would have used his left hand and pointed to his left side of his head.
His words were: "...a bullet ... RIGHT through the head"
RIGHT means also STRAIGHT or DIRECTLY, so i think Kilduff meant "directly" when he used the term "right".
DoubleR666 2 years ago