@Moutherfuckermike no you're not... You've ben hit of an tsunami and a eartshake i feel sorry for u and the rest in Japan if u still live.. Good luck with you're life!
Watch my last Black Ops 27 - 0 team deathmatch gameplay on Jungle at 1080p, i update often with good ratio gameplay. Subscribe to me please and sorry for spam but my channel is young.
i like when i have to wait for patch, do you know how fun is to see how this people fail, for example when i saw the old man's head spinning in fallout new Vegas. that made my day i guess even the week, every time i think of it i laugh
I think devs shouldn't announce a game until prior its release, prolly about a 6-8 months, if its too early then hype goes up and expectations go up. If it to late, then no ones gonna have money cuz everybodies out buying other games.
I prefer public alpha testing, but as long a development cycle as needed, much like the first Guild Wars, which was in testing for 2 years before the release. It was a completely different game.
Blizzard way! just do a beta and open it for people that pre-orders. that way you get a little money before it's released instead of releasing a bugged game.
May i ask why when Agarest 2 was announced clips from the first one were played? =P Still its a great game, if you can actually bare the fan service >.< Still, goods heads up.
the blizzard method, because than you don't just play and forget about the game. You play, and play again, and play again, and play again... than you get pissed that you've poured so much of your life into something that gives you nothing in the real world (unless you're Korean, than it gives you cold hard cash) so you break the game disk over your knee... And in another month you miss so much you run out to best buy and buy another, and the cycle begins anew!
I love assassins creed. It's got its flaws, this makes you either love the game or hate it. I think brotherhood will be awesome, will be playing it soon. I love blizzard, a lot of developers claim to have a fanbase, but I think blizzard is one of the few who really have a devoted fanbase. Developers like Bethesda and rockstar with their own flavor and style also tend to have a steady fanbase. I think these are the true future of gaming and not development monsters like EA.
I believe I do rather like getting a taste of the game, and being able to play it while they fix the problems. Id rather not wait 10years after they announce they are making a game just kinda bothers me that d3 has been in the works for so long and im still waiting. Also, its free game play of a new MMO who cant be stoked about that? :)
Definitely Blizzard's way. First impressions are everything, people just need to learn to be patient. Look at WoW's patch 1.10. People demanded that patch be released asap and constantly whined on the forums about how long it was taking. Blizz listened, released it, and the servers were broken for a week.
Definitely Blizzard's way. First impressions are everything, people just need to learn to be patient. Look at WoW's patch 1.10. People demanded that patch be released asap and constantly whined on the forums about how long it was taking. Blizz listened, released it, and the servers were broken for a week.
I don't know who these people are saying that blizzard has the better method. Anyone that endures the dreaded patch day will agree with me when I say, regardless of how much time they take, SOMETHING always is buggy. Great games none the less, but unless it's like starcraft 2 with some 12 years between it and it's predecessor, it's gonna have bugs.
First off, i love your whoop! outro. And with your QoTD: I would prefer the blizzard way but thats way too long, as long as the game isnt broken like New Vega then its all good.
Worth waiting for is much better. Look at games like MW2, ODST, and CoD3. All were rushed. MW2 had so many problems and still does, ODST was Rushed and was ok but by far the worst Halo game and CoD 3 was only developed for 8 months. Need I say more. Why bother getting a game early if it will suck
Failcom (funcom) likes to make great games but releases them with out really testing them, so they are buggy and have almost critical errors in their games for a few months... Great games that no one plays because of the first month that they try the game its buggy...
Blizzards way is better, there is a reason their name is so well known with a fairly low amount of game titles out for the years they have been a game company.
I'd rather have the game with a few bugs if that means I get to play it a year earlier. If it's popular there might be an active modding community to patch things, and community patches tend to work well and get released quick
As far as serious, competitive gaming goes, and now we're talking GSL levels of prizemoney, I like the blizz way better.
Also, WoW was buggy as hell when blizz first released it
Blizzards method, not only does it help polish the game, but all the people get to bond and build community's while also screaming at blizzard for delaying it...
Honestly it all depends on the game that your talking about here if its a multiplayer then working alot to fix obvious bugs is needed but when it comes to things that aren't then the best bet is to send it out and see if others can find any. Blizzards methods have functionality but I pretty impatient so beta testing every now and again probably satisfies my craving for something new otherwise I just start playing old stuff and it doesn't feel the same.
About the Japanese ratings: In America and Europe we rate games for teens in wich you get to (have to) kill other people. Is 'loving' people unsuited for our children but is killing them okay? Our rating system seems a bit off balance to me.
@Garmose i am a very patient indevidual, and judging by the comments i see all over this video, alot of people arent lol, people complain that bungee takes too long with halo games... HALO! that pumps out a new release every half year! (mild exaggeration lol) so for alot of people, it was too long
@WackoJacko1193 No, it was in production for only 4 years, blizzard's development team however was not working on it until 2006, since they were busy with World of Warcraft.
@DarkGamer101 Actually I think you're the mentally handicapped individual; since you cannot coherer an intelligent and meaningful conversation. Instead you resort to a more primitive means of communication which results in you expressing your feelings through blind, negative and ridiculous statements with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
Direct yourself to eurogamer and read articles/wow-held-up-starcraft-ii-for-a-year.
the blizzard method only works if you are making a damn good game, as opposed to EA's method of we'll put out anything and just hope we make enough money to cover the costs of shitting out one carbon copy after another. God forbid we see some actual thought or originality put into games.
@fractald YES! It's not just me! Layne has really improved during the run of the show, but I just can't understand why he kept that annoying "whoop" after the critique he received on the first show...
I even try to leave the page before the end so I don't have to hear it...
I prefer that they release the game READY TO PLAY so it doesn't need a patch. Might create more waiting, but so what. I have other games to enjoy while I wait.
Blizzard did the right thing. Did you guys ever read on their forums during the beta? There was so much whining and trash talk because of buggs.. During the BETA!! Seriously, good thing they waited so long.
Considering Blizzard way is possible maybe to 2-3 dev studios in the world, I will say, that it should always be golden middle: no class A bugs, but fixing everything in current generation game is impossible.
Blizzard has a proven track record that has served them well. Sadly, it's not financially viable for 95% of gaming companies out there, which is a damn shame. Quality over quantity.
Years and years developing... but blizzard as an example? They do patch A LOT. I'd say that method is the Sony or Apple method, they tend to delay releases to reach perfection more than anyone. It is a common mistake in the world today to push products to completion and release before they are ready, and not only for software, take modern mobile phones as an example.
@maartendesmet no need for name calling as if you know blizzard developer personally. The only reason you would ever need to patch a product is because it is not good enough, e.i. not completely finished. Things are better now but back when WoW first came it was so fucking buggy it was barely playable and it was patched on a daily basis. Know what the fuck you are talking about YOU dumb shit!
@johanullen the fact why they have to patch is because of unforseen problems, and thats the good way. i could care less about what u say about wow. patches don't always have to be because of the game is not good enough... sometimes it just needs a change, like in sc2, most patch changes are balance issues, they can't make the balance perfect before ppl start discovering all tactix etc etc...
@maartendesmet my arguement was not about why they patch but that they do patch. and back in the days they patched because the game was bad, unfinished, ask anyone who played from the start of vanilla. There are many examples of games that have never been patched, mostly because it wasn't possible but these games were often put through more testing, at least in comparisson to the complication level of the game. Blizzard might be very good, but they still release unfishied products.
Blizzard's method of game development is best, because it gets the bugs out and it also becomes an insurance that the developer will fix the bugs. In other words, if the developer has to stick to the project before it get released, then the game will receive its full attention. If the developer releases the game first, then the bugs and balancing might not be fully fixed given that the developer starts another project.
@scviper SC2 didnt have many bugs when it was released, most problems i saw was the new battle.net and some balance issues. The game itself worked just fine for me and never had any problems with bugs, only battle.net 2 fucked up from time to time. MMOs always have a "bajillion" bugs, but imo blizzard get the big ones fixed very fast while the minor ones takes some time.
The OLD Blizzard way is the best way, but lately even they've had a bajillion bugs in SC2 and WoW patches. Not only that, but they're taking their sweet time fixing some of them...
@WillCall024 The reason that is, is beacuse all the low level players whinge and bitch about how OP this is and how OP that is and it's all imbalanced...
@morpen1234 okay i agree that i love how refined starcraft was when it came out, but if people can deal with bugs for a little while, they can provide feedback and the problems will be solved much faster than for the game company to refine it by themselves, so ultimately the early release method definitely solves the problems quicker, but that is just personal preference, some people just cant take bugs.
bliz method. that way i dont get a game in its beta stage(see: black ops) when its released and have to wait 2 months anyways for it to become playable.
Blizzard method ftw. I mean yeah it took Starcraft 2 more than a decade to come out. But its a jewel. I would prefer to re use a jewel, than to use cheap stones.
i prefer blizzard method it may take longer but when it's finnaly there you are so happy and everything just goes the way you want it better then your like nice its out and then you find some bugs and are doubting the game soooo yeaa :/
blizzard's method. Not sure how anyone could say the opposite, a game released very buggy shows the motivation of the developers is to release it fast without a great deal of respect for quality or the community as a cash cow as opposed to a good finished product.
i prefer bugs. i think its exciting getting it early and feeling the rawness of the game. bugs can be super fun. Thumbs of for DL Rock Priests in Priston Tale. Anyone ? Anyone at all?
I prefer it when games come out with no bugs. And now every game that's released is full of bugs and it annoys me. What happened to the days when games came out with no bugs at all?
@hughzshooz Because in the past games were a whole lot more simple. I don't know if you've ever tried to code a next gen game, but it's sure as shit no cake-walk.
I like playing games that are not buggy as hell. Also go play all assassin's creed games! First one was stupidly repetative but its worth it for the story and the 2nd game is just amazing. Now im waiting for pc release of the new one :(
Definitely like waiting for a quality, polished game. Nothing's worth waiting and getting excited (and lets face it, we all love finally picking up that game after we've been wait for sooooooo long) for when you get it home and it's all buggy, servers are slow or down ect...
should play all the assassin's creed games they were awesome also i like blizz's method alittle bit on some of their games. there is no problem taking the time to make an awesome game. if it got released b4 it was ready and you have to sit there through all the bugs...yeah you will probably loose alot of your fan base.
I love the "WHOOP" thing in the end!
skater360slim 2 weeks ago
Bliz way most of the time but if its very minor bugs thats fine
Rush2724 1 month ago in playlist Season 1
Blizzards way id rather wait a long time and get something really worth that waiting then play something right away and rage at every bug..
97UchihaMadara 8 months ago
@Moutherfuckermike no you're not... You've ben hit of an tsunami and a eartshake i feel sorry for u and the rest in Japan if u still live.. Good luck with you're life!
MrPowerbunny 11 months ago
just get minecrafted from installous
nadenessnick 11 months ago
Lol, I still have minecrafted on my iPod, installous works like a charm!
Westin95 1 year ago
@Westin95 haha yea!
nadenessnick 11 months ago
minecraft on iPhone and you guys fucking talk about blizzard?!
4Orange2Bud0 1 year ago
@Gollum544 Not if you're good.
JoeCool1777 1 year ago
better late than laggy
grafkid13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch my last Black Ops 27 - 0 team deathmatch gameplay on Jungle at 1080p, i update often with good ratio gameplay. Subscribe to me please and sorry for spam but my channel is young.
ClintEastwood82Ps3 1 year ago
blizzz way the best way
dotagodKO01 1 year ago
Blizzards way
Oferkyll 1 year ago
I like my game finished thanks.
iaMyla 1 year ago
Assassin's Creed 1 - 2 - brotherhood is DEF worth playing. PLEASE PLAY FROM AC1, do not start from 2 or 2 BH. you might feel lost!
kduv889 1 year ago
when a game is ready its ready, blizzards way for sure.
edwadragon1 1 year ago 6
when a game is ready, its ready. blizzard's way for sure.
edwadragon1 1 year ago 2
i like when i have to wait for patch, do you know how fun is to see how this people fail, for example when i saw the old man's head spinning in fallout new Vegas. that made my day i guess even the week, every time i think of it i laugh
chacaron03 1 year ago
@ywiy
Yea game devs build so much anticipation like with E3 I don't want to be teased with a game coming out like a year and a few months later.
AnimeKen15 1 year ago
I WANNA PLAY FINAL FANTASY 14 BUT I DONT WANNA PAY FOR IT EVERY MONTH
MckaiserDragon 1 year ago
I think devs shouldn't announce a game until prior its release, prolly about a 6-8 months, if its too early then hype goes up and expectations go up. If it to late, then no ones gonna have money cuz everybodies out buying other games.
ywiy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blizzard doesnt do that.... just look at wow.
it is, always has been, and always will be unbalanced.
ObsessiveCooking 1 year ago
bethasoft needs to learn a thing or million off blizzard, so yes i'm going to go with "quality control" development. GT5 is another great example
hitaro47 1 year ago
I wouldn't wait 10years to play a video game. I rather they release the game with minor bugs then patch it, rather than waiting.
But if it to the extent of the game not even playable, I rather wait.
jvn09211 1 year ago
@jvn09211
And there in lies the problem. When do you deem a game to be playable?
Tsenister 1 year ago
Furbie? Noooo! Not again!
Flameclaw123 1 year ago
Blizzards way rules. But what new company can afford to spend ten years on a game? None.
Games like torchlight are a good alternative. Small, polished games which give the developers time and money to create bigger projects.
Carrandas 1 year ago
FUCKING PLAY ASSASSIN'S CREED.
Oh my God. seriously. It is possibly the best series to start in this gen. Layne do it dammit! Check it out!
solidsnake11087 1 year ago
creed is awsome
madmen561 1 year ago
yes check out assassins creed.
Assassins Creed FTW
tedeah 1 year ago
I prefer public alpha testing, but as long a development cycle as needed, much like the first Guild Wars, which was in testing for 2 years before the release. It was a completely different game.
thealliedhacker 1 year ago
Blizzard way! just do a beta and open it for people that pre-orders. that way you get a little money before it's released instead of releasing a bugged game.
DeJayHank 1 year ago
Um that game is for teens?
What is wrong with the Japanese...i've got nothing literally against them but some of things they makes are just wrong!
bizarrostearns 1 year ago
For everyone who wonders; The name of the first game is:
'Record of Agarest War 2'
DigitalCakes 1 year ago
May i ask why when Agarest 2 was announced clips from the first one were played? =P Still its a great game, if you can actually bare the fan service >.< Still, goods heads up.
TheCaptainash 1 year ago
the blizzard method, because than you don't just play and forget about the game. You play, and play again, and play again, and play again... than you get pissed that you've poured so much of your life into something that gives you nothing in the real world (unless you're Korean, than it gives you cold hard cash) so you break the game disk over your knee... And in another month you miss so much you run out to best buy and buy another, and the cycle begins anew!
MrJaredblake7 1 year ago
I love assassins creed. It's got its flaws, this makes you either love the game or hate it. I think brotherhood will be awesome, will be playing it soon. I love blizzard, a lot of developers claim to have a fanbase, but I think blizzard is one of the few who really have a devoted fanbase. Developers like Bethesda and rockstar with their own flavor and style also tend to have a steady fanbase. I think these are the true future of gaming and not development monsters like EA.
DisturbedTwo 1 year ago
I believe I do rather like getting a taste of the game, and being able to play it while they fix the problems. Id rather not wait 10years after they announce they are making a game just kinda bothers me that d3 has been in the works for so long and im still waiting. Also, its free game play of a new MMO who cant be stoked about that? :)
ShinobiDaNinja 1 year ago
Definitely Blizzard's way. First impressions are everything, people just need to learn to be patient. Look at WoW's patch 1.10. People demanded that patch be released asap and constantly whined on the forums about how long it was taking. Blizz listened, released it, and the servers were broken for a week.
TheBaron87YT 1 year ago
Definitely Blizzard's way. First impressions are everything, people just need to learn to be patient. Look at WoW's patch 1.10. People demanded that patch be released asap and constantly whined on the forums about how long it was taking. Blizz listened, released it, and the servers were broken for a week.
TheBaron87YT 1 year ago
I don't know who these people are saying that blizzard has the better method. Anyone that endures the dreaded patch day will agree with me when I say, regardless of how much time they take, SOMETHING always is buggy. Great games none the less, but unless it's like starcraft 2 with some 12 years between it and it's predecessor, it's gonna have bugs.
thegreattaiyou 1 year ago
@thegreattaiyou They make them excellent. There is no better way. Don't release early.
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
First off, i love your whoop! outro. And with your QoTD: I would prefer the blizzard way but thats way too long, as long as the game isnt broken like New Vega then its all good.
sanzoghun 1 year ago 2
the blizz method isnt.. exactly the best way.
i agree that blizz games are the best ones out there, by far!.
But without the other ones, what would we do in our spare. bored time :D?
Cycloud 1 year ago
@Cycloud Ya if only 1 game was out each year they wouldn't make enouph money and we would have nothing to play :)
Nuage151 1 year ago
@Cycloud Maybe play more quality games? I hate sorting through the shit.
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
You've never played Assassin's Creed???? Are you insane? Go buy all of them you fool!!!!
jmovlogs 1 year ago
@jmovlogs I played 10 minutes and liked what I saw, should I get them? like I love RPGs and Strategy it seemed kind of strategy... good to get it?
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
But, you have to remember, Blizz has a shit-ton of cash to do so.
dcdanchalmes 1 year ago
@dcdanchalmes Why does Blizz have a shit-ton of money? Because everyone buys their awesome games!
Xerxes4242 1 year ago
Worth waiting for is much better. Look at games like MW2, ODST, and CoD3. All were rushed. MW2 had so many problems and still does, ODST was Rushed and was ok but by far the worst Halo game and CoD 3 was only developed for 8 months. Need I say more. Why bother getting a game early if it will suck
unbindingfloyd 1 year ago
That was not the case with World Of Warcraft. It was full of bugs and shit at release!
kuanne 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blizzard way is better.
By the time a released game have fixed their bugs and the game actually becomes good, you most probably have stopped playing it already.
Azothorass 1 year ago
Comment removed
Azothorass 1 year ago
blizzard method is the only way to go. It's so sad that gamedevelopers these day take comfort in knowing they will bring out a buggy game. So sad.
Slacker1081 1 year ago
@Slacker1081 Either that or they can't afford to post-pone the release as much as Blizzard can.
Nashtak 1 year ago
Failcom (funcom) likes to make great games but releases them with out really testing them, so they are buggy and have almost critical errors in their games for a few months... Great games that no one plays because of the first month that they try the game its buggy...
Blizzards way is better, there is a reason their name is so well known with a fairly low amount of game titles out for the years they have been a game company.
ShippoTail 1 year ago
I'd rather have the game with a few bugs if that means I get to play it a year earlier. If it's popular there might be an active modding community to patch things, and community patches tend to work well and get released quick
As far as serious, competitive gaming goes, and now we're talking GSL levels of prizemoney, I like the blizz way better.
Also, WoW was buggy as hell when blizz first released it
podmember 1 year ago
Bugs are part of the gaming experience. I'd rather get to play a glitchy/buggy version of something than have to wait for forever for it.
Senshaij 1 year ago
I kinda like the Valve way of waiting ten years then having things broken and fixed and broken and fixed through patches
randompersonB 1 year ago
Blizzards method, not only does it help polish the game, but all the people get to bond and build community's while also screaming at blizzard for delaying it...
DarkGamer101 1 year ago
Honestly it all depends on the game that your talking about here if its a multiplayer then working alot to fix obvious bugs is needed but when it comes to things that aren't then the best bet is to send it out and see if others can find any. Blizzards methods have functionality but I pretty impatient so beta testing every now and again probably satisfies my craving for something new otherwise I just start playing old stuff and it doesn't feel the same.
KCGL77 1 year ago
Blizz's method.
Garmose 1 year ago
About the Japanese ratings: In America and Europe we rate games for teens in wich you get to (have to) kill other people. Is 'loving' people unsuited for our children but is killing them okay? Our rating system seems a bit off balance to me.
Dreavious0 1 year ago
I would prefer good games fast. It is possible, look at Bioware. They pump out high quality games like crazy.
baligaandris 1 year ago
I'd rather wait than be given some half-finished piece of crap.
Denamic 1 year ago
Blizzard didn't spend 10 years, they spent 4 years. :P
mit871chell 1 year ago
@mit871chell there was definitely alot more than 4 years time between bw and sc2
WackoJacko1193 1 year ago
@WackoJacko1193 They didn't start SC2 RIGHT when BW came out...
Garmose 1 year ago
@Garmose yeah, okay i know, but even so, took waaay too long
WackoJacko1193 1 year ago
@WackoJacko1193 No it didn't. It was def. worth waiting for.
Garmose 1 year ago
@Garmose yes, i never said it wasnt worth waiting for, i said i waited too long, lol
WackoJacko1193 1 year ago
@WackoJacko1193 If it was worth waiting for, then you didn't wait too long now did you? =)
Garmose 1 year ago
@Garmose i am a very patient indevidual, and judging by the comments i see all over this video, alot of people arent lol, people complain that bungee takes too long with halo games... HALO! that pumps out a new release every half year! (mild exaggeration lol) so for alot of people, it was too long
WackoJacko1193 1 year ago
@WackoJacko1193 Halo fans are ignorant. We shall not bring them into the mix of "gamers". And fair enough. :P
Garmose 1 year ago
@WackoJacko1193 No, it was in production for only 4 years, blizzard's development team however was not working on it until 2006, since they were busy with World of Warcraft.
mit871chell 1 year ago
@mit871chell lol your fucking retarded.
DarkGamer101 1 year ago
@DarkGamer101 Actually I think you're the mentally handicapped individual; since you cannot coherer an intelligent and meaningful conversation. Instead you resort to a more primitive means of communication which results in you expressing your feelings through blind, negative and ridiculous statements with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
Direct yourself to eurogamer and read articles/wow-held-up-starcraft-ii-for-a-year.
mit871chell 1 year ago
the early release way. sure blizz is good at ironing out kinks but if every game took ten years to develop we wouldnt have a lot of choices
Chuckles454 1 year ago
yes got to go with the way blizz dose it
trent0987 1 year ago
agreed with the whoop comment
noreabelf 1 year ago
blizzards method
theret1 1 year ago
the blizzard method only works if you are making a damn good game, as opposed to EA's method of we'll put out anything and just hope we make enough money to cover the costs of shitting out one carbon copy after another. God forbid we see some actual thought or originality put into games.
allaricdeschain 1 year ago
That whoop at the end needs to stop happening forever.
fractald 1 year ago
@fractald I love the whoop!
loendir 1 year ago 11
@fractald YES! It's not just me! Layne has really improved during the run of the show, but I just can't understand why he kept that annoying "whoop" after the critique he received on the first show...
I even try to leave the page before the end so I don't have to hear it...
navimud 1 year ago
There is a reason why Blizzard is such a huge company today and some other game developers have failed to reach the same heights. :)
bamse4470 1 year ago
Spend time, do it RIGHT.
Tehdung2 1 year ago
I prefer that they release the game READY TO PLAY so it doesn't need a patch. Might create more waiting, but so what. I have other games to enjoy while I wait.
ThePro2004 1 year ago
Quality > Quantity but that's in close debate concerning boobs..
CaptLogun 1 year ago
@CaptLogun Well, I would rather some really perfect boobs than be surrounded by a bunch of saggy ones.
mewmewtwogengar 1 year ago
blizzard all the way. valve also released good games.
Marius2000 1 year ago
Blizzard did the right thing. Did you guys ever read on their forums during the beta? There was so much whining and trash talk because of buggs.. During the BETA!! Seriously, good thing they waited so long.
nejtilsvampe 1 year ago 37
@nejtilsvampe lol like there's not a ton of bugs atm at least on eu servers ( sc2 i mean)
jajebiewpizdujebana 1 year ago
@jajebiewpizdujebana soo.. you saying they shouldn't have waited so we'd have had more buggs? great logic buddy.
Also there's not that many buggs at all... You're a "glass half emtpy"-kind-of-guy aren't you?
nejtilsvampe 1 year ago
Polishing the game as much as possible is the way to go! No bugs.
Well, after playing the infamous Gothic 3... uhh.. that was the last Gothic title for me.
irprOh 1 year ago
Considering Blizzard way is possible maybe to 2-3 dev studios in the world, I will say, that it should always be golden middle: no class A bugs, but fixing everything in current generation game is impossible.
akodo77 1 year ago
Blizzard, it really disappointing to get this buggy game. It sort of ruins some of the fun you have with it. First Impressions really.
axeltheswordman 1 year ago
blizzards way
KonomioTheHuntres 1 year ago
Blizzard has a proven track record that has served them well. Sadly, it's not financially viable for 95% of gaming companies out there, which is a damn shame. Quality over quantity.
sYs73m 1 year ago 2
I prefer when they release earlier, but only with minor bugs. Talk about 50% early and 50% Blizzard.
Petersaberros 1 year ago
Blizz are so slow though -_-''
DaemonTFO 1 year ago
Years and years developing... but blizzard as an example? They do patch A LOT. I'd say that method is the Sony or Apple method, they tend to delay releases to reach perfection more than anyone. It is a common mistake in the world today to push products to completion and release before they are ready, and not only for software, take modern mobile phones as an example.
johanullen 1 year ago
@johanullen then u don't know blizzard u dumb shit, every company has to patch their games for obvious reasons!
maartendesmet 1 year ago
@maartendesmet no need for name calling as if you know blizzard developer personally. The only reason you would ever need to patch a product is because it is not good enough, e.i. not completely finished. Things are better now but back when WoW first came it was so fucking buggy it was barely playable and it was patched on a daily basis. Know what the fuck you are talking about YOU dumb shit!
johanullen 1 year ago
@johanullen the fact why they have to patch is because of unforseen problems, and thats the good way. i could care less about what u say about wow. patches don't always have to be because of the game is not good enough... sometimes it just needs a change, like in sc2, most patch changes are balance issues, they can't make the balance perfect before ppl start discovering all tactix etc etc...
maartendesmet 1 year ago
@maartendesmet my arguement was not about why they patch but that they do patch. and back in the days they patched because the game was bad, unfinished, ask anyone who played from the start of vanilla. There are many examples of games that have never been patched, mostly because it wasn't possible but these games were often put through more testing, at least in comparisson to the complication level of the game. Blizzard might be very good, but they still release unfishied products.
johanullen 1 year ago
@johanullen i'm done with u, u'z just dumb :p
maartendesmet 1 year ago
releasing an unfinished product is never a good idea in my opinion.
xpektins 1 year ago
fuck blizz way, fuck waiting
deathstreaks 1 year ago
STEAM for teh win
magyarock1 1 year ago
blizzard... but itl still have bugs
miroradev 1 year ago
Blizzard's way is the best damn way
mychyboy 1 year ago
Well maby 10 Years is a bit mutch but a delay is fine for me i dont wanna be stuck im any more wall's
andr9492 1 year ago
as long as the game is worth it i dont mind waiting, and with blizzard games we always get that.
thehomeruz 1 year ago
the blizzard way......i prefer not to falll through the floor in a game :P
firemage928 1 year ago
Blizzard's method of game development is best, because it gets the bugs out and it also becomes an insurance that the developer will fix the bugs. In other words, if the developer has to stick to the project before it get released, then the game will receive its full attention. If the developer releases the game first, then the bugs and balancing might not be fully fixed given that the developer starts another project.
kiseitai2 1 year ago
There is a reason why every single blizzard game is pure gold.
BaadHQ 1 year ago 2
@yehnahbro But he's calls himself a gamer, he should've at least played a mainstream game like AC once.
HDDashwood 1 year ago
Blizzards way
Kingorc1000 1 year ago 8
@scviper SC2 didnt have many bugs when it was released, most problems i saw was the new battle.net and some balance issues. The game itself worked just fine for me and never had any problems with bugs, only battle.net 2 fucked up from time to time. MMOs always have a "bajillion" bugs, but imo blizzard get the big ones fixed very fast while the minor ones takes some time.
chronilus 1 year ago
I wouldn't give Blizzard as an example of a company that polishes their games before publishing them.
DIchronicaddict 1 year ago
The OLD Blizzard way is the best way, but lately even they've had a bajillion bugs in SC2 and WoW patches. Not only that, but they're taking their sweet time fixing some of them...
scviper 1 year ago
umm.... Blizzard is still fixing SC2 as we speak, at least 2-3 patches have come out since the release.
WillCall024 1 year ago
@WillCall024 The reason that is, is beacuse all the low level players whinge and bitch about how OP this is and how OP that is and it's all imbalanced...
MrCaboose1337 1 year ago
The Blizzard way is the Best way
morpen1234 1 year ago 188
@morpen1234 okay i agree that i love how refined starcraft was when it came out, but if people can deal with bugs for a little while, they can provide feedback and the problems will be solved much faster than for the game company to refine it by themselves, so ultimately the early release method definitely solves the problems quicker, but that is just personal preference, some people just cant take bugs.
WackoJacko1193 1 year ago
bliz method. that way i dont get a game in its beta stage(see: black ops) when its released and have to wait 2 months anyways for it to become playable.
Sheeprwer 1 year ago
Blizzard method ftw. I mean yeah it took Starcraft 2 more than a decade to come out. But its a jewel. I would prefer to re use a jewel, than to use cheap stones.
SilentShotV 1 year ago
i prefer blizzard method it may take longer but when it's finnaly there you are so happy and everything just goes the way you want it better then your like nice its out and then you find some bugs and are doubting the game soooo yeaa :/
abc3def7 1 year ago
I prefer they just have betas so the product is released with minimal glitches and we get an early view of the game to see if we like it.
RTTCRDog 1 year ago
so many articles released every week, spending some extra time fixing the bugs before releasing will save us a lot of time. Blizzard ftw
Ryko89 1 year ago
WAIT TILL THE FRIGGIN GAME WORKS BEFORE YOU RELEASE IT!!!
excalibr8 1 year ago 2
Blizzard method! Much better :D I know you have to wait a long time to get one of there new games, But It is sertaintly worth the waiting time. :)
dkbarty14 1 year ago 2
Blizz Method.
jampodevral 1 year ago 3
I love blizzard (hate wow, but love diablo and starcraft)
csrdTimmex 1 year ago
i think blizz method is better
1ziber1 1 year ago 115
Layne, please add the news links in description. Great show! :)
blaablaakas 1 year ago
@soulhunter1809 On consoles maybe. The game is despised and loathed on the PC's, the home of FPS :P
Darahcos 1 year ago
The Blizzard Way ofc-.-
DestromathD031337 1 year ago 2
nice drawing
gnomkillah 1 year ago
FFIV is out?
Heto75 1 year ago
Blizzard the king of Gaming! Diablo III is going to be awsome!
linexnick 1 year ago
Blizzard FTW!
Ol yea and T for Mature ... ?
shalkana 1 year ago
I want blizz method aswell
MrJonkan 1 year ago
For every bug I find I punch a baby. So you think the developers would know better.
dustink50 1 year ago
@dustink50 lol
1ziber1 1 year ago
I think it really depends on the game.
For example SC2-online game where the fairness is a big matter-the blizz method is way better
but if the game is minecraft-like where fairness and atmosphere don't matter i'd like the early-release-ish things
PersonifiedDoom 1 year ago
Blizzard method FTW
marat271 1 year ago
blizzard method FTW
RiptorSLO 1 year ago
I prefer the "blizzard" method, it's just pisses me off when I play a game that is crowded with bugs
perhir01 1 year ago
blizzard's method. Not sure how anyone could say the opposite, a game released very buggy shows the motivation of the developers is to release it fast without a great deal of respect for quality or the community as a cash cow as opposed to a good finished product.
dripdripdrippird 1 year ago
Blizzard's method. Starcraft 2 was so worth the waiting time. I love you Blizzard.
ShacklesOfLife 1 year ago
Assassins Creed FTW !!!!!!!!
valkata107 1 year ago
dude, plz tell what's the song at the end
alexxfloo 1 year ago
You haven't played any AC???
What are you waiting for?
peronjaj1 1 year ago
delay it a little so we don't have to get too many fucking bugs or lag.....
zkear0n 1 year ago
Waiting for games can be good, but when they're like GT5 and take 6 years to come out and Diablo 3 and take over 10, then yeah
Babs0117 1 year ago
aslong ther aint any major bug ther ruin the game i dont mind them come out early and fix it later :)
TheTronks 1 year ago
i have an unused beta key for final fantasy XIV if anyone wants it
alpako94 1 year ago
i prefer bugs. i think its exciting getting it early and feeling the rawness of the game. bugs can be super fun. Thumbs of for DL Rock Priests in Priston Tale. Anyone ? Anyone at all?
IAmNgatai 1 year ago
I prefer it when games come out with no bugs. And now every game that's released is full of bugs and it annoys me. What happened to the days when games came out with no bugs at all?
hughzshooz 1 year ago
@hughzshooz Because in the past games were a whole lot more simple. I don't know if you've ever tried to code a next gen game, but it's sure as shit no cake-walk.
kendo512 1 year ago
I like playing games that are not buggy as hell. Also go play all assassin's creed games! First one was stupidly repetative but its worth it for the story and the 2nd game is just amazing. Now im waiting for pc release of the new one :(
Fiishylol 1 year ago
Definitely like waiting for a quality, polished game. Nothing's worth waiting and getting excited (and lets face it, we all love finally picking up that game after we've been wait for sooooooo long) for when you get it home and it's all buggy, servers are slow or down ect...
Fireheart15 1 year ago
should play all the assassin's creed games they were awesome also i like blizz's method alittle bit on some of their games. there is no problem taking the time to make an awesome game. if it got released b4 it was ready and you have to sit there through all the bugs...yeah you will probably loose alot of your fan base.
shadowcrone 1 year ago
Layne, you should definetely play Assassin's Creed 2 and Assassin's creed 2 brotherhood if you haven't yet
Traun7771 1 year ago
Blizzard method, altough could be a tiny bit faster then a decade.
Daniarster 1 year ago
What's the name of that first game?
0Ogawa0 1 year ago
anytime i think of blizzard method i think of Starcraft Ghost... push back 15 times and then dropped..
Youngbucker09 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Youngbucker09 thank god though
greeneightball 1 year ago
I don't mind if the games are alittle buggy like black ops as long as I get my money's worth.
controllerthrowers 1 year ago