Added: 4 years ago
From: DoctorTweek
Views: 54,675
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,609)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What kind of person is always telling the ''masses'' that they are stupid ignorant fucktards and who tells the masses ''don't question me''??

    I have a question about the minute long life span of very complex microscopic organisms.

    We study 1000s of generations in a day as they mutate and adapt to new environments yet we never see any evolve into a more complex life form.

    Why? If evolution is a fact then shouldn't we observe it in the life forms who only live for a single minute?

  • I thought Darwin said the single cells in the human body were simple and reflected the basic simple celled life forms which we evolved from.

    How would he explain the fact that they are highly complex and that many microscopic life forms are infinately smaller and equally as complex

    Microscopic life forms often live for no more than a minute. We study 1000s of generations in a day. We watch them mutate. Ask how come none has ever evolved into a more complex and higher life form.

  • Darwin said the simple cells which make up the human body were the smallest in life. He said simple cells would mutate and after 1000s of generations the simple organism would become more complex

    Questoin

    Ask your science teacher about these microscopic organisms we now study which only live for a minute

    We watch 1000s of generations in a day. They adapt. Why has none ever evolved into a higher life form.

    Shouldn't there be a virus which has evolved into a ''baricus...'' or something?

  • People misunderstand the meaning of the word "theory." In everyday english, "theory" is pretty much synonymous with "idea," which requires no foundation of proof and no audience of believers, but in science an idea actually requires substantial proof and numerous constituent believers before it can even earn the name "theory."

    Consider this: evolution is only a "theory," but then again so is gravity.

  • @Pierce188 A scientific experiment begins with an idea (theory). Scientists then produce conditions which will allow them to study and observe, prove or disprove...Gravity is a proven theory. It's been studied. Observed.

    Evolutions has yet to be proven or disproven. It's still at stage one.

    No scientist has yet been able to observe a species do anything other than mutate or alter specific traits for temporary adaptations.

    It's all ideas worth discussion. We don't have to swallow the whole thing

  • @cbasallie So you are basically saying the opposite of what I just said? Well you're wrong. A science experiment begins with a hypothesis, which then becomes a theory if it is supported by evidence. Nothing can ever be fully proven, but just one experiment can disprove something. That is a paraphrase of Einstein.

    Gravity isn't proven to exist. That is what scientists LHC are trying to resolve.

  • @Pierce188 The effects of gravity are proven. You are saying they aren't? Really? You believe that gravity ... like evolution.... is in the ''hypothetical'' stage?

    I can't believe I'm having a dialogue with you.

    Ok.

    Anyhoo.... things don't fall to the ground at a rate and speed which can be predicted and measured based on their mass? Really?

    You think gravity isn't proven? You think Evolution and Gravity are the same sort of ideas.....

    wow

  • @cbasallie Just go vote for Ron Paul. I'm done with this. Just reading through your moronic and clumsy thought process is exhausting. It's clear that 10th grade Biology was the last science class you cared to take a D in.

  • @cbasallie Moreover, evolution actually has been observed in real time in a lab. Just on a small scale.

    I used the gravity/evolution analogy because many well respected scientists use the same analogy. Did you think I made it up?

    You, on the other hand, have clearly made up a series of random "facts" to support your own beliefs. Einstein had plenty to say about this too.

    You should really look things up before you post.

  • @Pierce188 You are saying that humans have observed certain species giving birth to different species?

    Really?

    Do you know the difference between a mutation and newly evolved creature?

    Do you know what adaptation is?

    Scientists have certainly observed life forms adapting and mutating.

    However, as of yet, we have not observed bacteria spawning fish or fish spawning birds...even though the life cycle of these life forms is very short easily observed....

  • There seems to be a lot of comments posted here that are just juvenile. Most of you watching this video cannot comprehend what was said.

    The person in the video was asked a question that was sure to inflame either side of humanity.

    The knee jerk reaction on youtube is flawed.

    What he really said is that, based on a complete understanding of why we are even here in the first place has yet to be understood.

    I am a non-believer and I get it!

    That is it!

  • @tomgunns Of course. The media is trying to manipulate the masses. Divide and conquer. They figure it's a ''damned if you do and damned if you don't'' question that will force the Doctor to say something which; they can manipulate into food which will anger 1/2 of the public.

    They think we care. They think we're stupid. It won't work

  • I'm still trying to understand, how is this not an appropriate question to ask a Candidate? wRong Paul is just a Christian MORON!

  • @deeppurple28 What relevance does this have to the presidential candidacy? I hate when politicians compete over whos the more God fearing Christian of the bunch. They always seem to make their way back to that topic, as if it has any importance to their policies.

  • @CelticPoison Did you know that religion can directly affect the decisions politicians make in office? wRong Paul doesn't believe in a separation of church and state!

  • @deeppurple28 Of course it can, as do any strong beliefs or values. As a nation, we had a front row view of Bush's revenge for Daddy. Ron Paul, when speaking on the matter, clearly states the difference between moral values from religion and our country being run by a theocracy.

    Regardless, Im rather sick and tired of hearing their continued blather about religion. So again, what relevance does the question about evolution have with his policies? Its like asking if dogs are cool.

  • @CelticPoison Your analogy of the dogs makes as much sense as a fruit roll up! Ron Paul claims he's a scientist! Riiight, Oh for fucks sake, Years and years of observation and research that exists in support of Evolution, and Ron Paul simply dismisses it by saying, "Its just a theory and I reject it"! What a croc!

  • @deeppurple28 First off, relax, I never understood how people can so casually turn a normal chat into one massive rant. You make your points, and Ill make mine, no need to cry about it.

    With that being said, never has he claimed to be a scientist; hes a board certified doctor, always has been. These insults, would you say the same for the other candidates, because theyre far more extreme when it comes to religion. Do values not matter to you, when you can so easily ridicule his?

  • @CelticPoison Do you realize that you're trying to have a reasonable debate with a moron? I'm just sayin.....

  • @CelticPoison Of course he has claimed to be a scientist, just search for the video titled, "The Cult of Ron Paul" Then you will find him stating that he's a doctor, and that he's a scientist! Besides, Ron Paul has also stated that the Secular left wants to take religion out of our lives, hes referenced how the founding fathers envisioned a Christian America! I think Ron Paul is pretty Senile now and he needs to be taking his medication not running for President! He's too old!

  • @deeppurple28 Oh that's bad.

    If Dr. Paul has his way then it means rights are GIVEN to humans by an enigmatic and inexplicable Creature....my...oh my.....

    How can we ever get the sheeple to give up their rights if they ''believe'' and ''think'' that those rights are God given....

    wait...

    I know....

    Rabbi Karl Marx had a great idea....let's teach them that government GIVES rights and so ..... government can TAKE them away

  • @deeppurple28 Interesting stuff, Im curious how the other candidates measure up in your opinion.

  • @CelticPoison The other candidates? Well in regards to the other candidates, Even though I dislike Paul's ideas, I am trying to figure how the F does a retard like Santorum beat Ron Paul in Iowa!? I don't Like Paul's ideas that much, but at least his ideas are not as retarded as the rest of the candidates! Paul is probably the smartest one!

  • @deeppurple28 Huntsman is smarter then all of them, but he's gone now.

  • a guy that doesen t understand evolution doesn t give a shit on evolution of a better sociaty as well. blinded by his religious views he is going to reinstall social darwinism without no regulations at all! all his followers are just the new superdumb generation of america! vote for democrats if you have brain!

  • @robocommunist

    You mean even more superdumb... Right? I mean you are one of the people calling people out on being idiots and I don't think you produced a single sentence that did not have a spelling error.

  • @RogerabbitGosu what spelling error? arrogant ignoramus, i ve never been in any english speaking country in the world in my life. so i might make spelling errors. but you, you are just dim and have no idea what i wanted you to say. so you didn't bring up any argument at all. if the early industrial like society of paul comes, i will be the first who will sell you canceraus food and toxic water, that all you libartarian bastards will die! you "disbelieve" in evolution as well?

  • Even though I disagree with Paul on everything he said here about evolution, I still agree with his political views. And he also makes a point saying it's not a relevant question for a politician to begin with. My vote would still go for him.

  • Even though I disagree with Paul on everything he said here about evolution, I still agree with his political views. And he also makes a point saying it's not a relevant question for a politician to begin with.

  • Evolution is not a theological question. *headdesk*

  • Are my comments being censored by a bot? Thats America for you ...If you don't like the truth censor it to make sure no one else is educated this is fucking pathetic.

  • @Marshallcodystamps lol, you're an idiot.

  • @TLNoir and your a fool. Psalm 14 1The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

  • @Marshallcodystamps implying everyone follows the bible. read and quote all you want, it only makes you look like an idiot.

  • what a joke!

  • how can a theroy developed by science not be a scientific fact but a religion?

    this is the country that i live in

    where this is actualy debated

    this ignorance is only going to make our country retarded and left behind by the rest of the world in education

    america is becoming a real life version of the movie idiocrocy

  • @marigolds44

    I can't believe I'm getting involved in this but could you please explain to me how evolution is not science and is a religion?

  • @BillsFan716 There is no explanation. Evolution. Is. Science. Period.

    Whoever you're replying to is clearly a fucking idiot if you had to ask that question.

  • @BillsFan716 The websters definition of science is testable, demonstrable, the theory of evolution you cannot demonstrate you can only imagine that it happened in your mind long ago and far away like in the fairy tales, the creationist believe in the beginning God and evolutionist believe in the beginning DIRT it is just as much a religion but it is tax supported.

  • @Marshallcodystamps Now you're just wrong, if you cared to educate yourself on evolution you would realize how wrong you are. The "theory" of evolution has huge amounts to SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to back it up. The fossil record, radiometric dating, biogeography, all of these things back up evolution and provide evidence for it.

  • @BillsFan716 the fossil record is in nowhere but the textbooks all over the world its not even in the same order and its never complete and there are also polystrate trees in the verticle position running through these layers.. and also found upside down that can only be explained by a flood.

  • @Marshallcodystamps

    First of all, you contradict yourself in the first by first saying there are no fossils and then saying there are and they're all mixed up. I have found fossils on my own so I know they exist. Second of all fossil strata gets mixed around from earthquakes and other such natural phenomena. Even if they are mixed up, it is still possible to determine the age of them by using techniques such as radiocarbon dating.

  • @Marshallcodystamps Micro-evolution is observable fact. Look it up. How else does the cold virus keep changing itself to become immune to our vaccines every year? Now macro-evolution is something that is suggested by both our fossil records, radiometric dating, etc. that @BillsFan716 mentioned and by the fact that our bodies are made up of individual cells, just like microorganisms. If it happens to them, it's only logical that it happens to us. Please do some actual research

  • @IrishRocker88 yes micro evolution happens you can get a big dog and a little dog all day long, but do they ever change to a diff kind of animal.. NO!!! the bible says they will bring forth after their KIND... it has never been observed an animal changing kinds you have to IMAGINE it and the reason our bodies have individual cells just like microorganisms only proves the same guy made it... the lug nuts off a pontiac will fit on a chevy but it dont mean it evolved from a honda.

  • @Marshallcodystamps You have no idea what micro-evolution is. Your metaphors are so far off it's insane. Please educate yourself.

  • "If that were the issue of the day, I wouldn't be running for public office." -applause.. What the Fu@#@!!?? Reason Rally 2012 March 24 Washington D.C.

  • It's amazing to me that Ron Paul's supporters have so many problems with him, this being a major one, yet they somehow dismiss or justify to themselves all of the problems with the guy because he has become 'The Great White Hope' somehow.

    Well, maybe you'll get what you want, and he'll deregulate everything. Think the banks are robbing us now??? Wait until it's LEGAL to steal from you, openly - that's the future Ron Paul wants to bring to the table.

  • Comment removed

  • How is it an inappropriate question to ask you senile moron? I think its a perfectly legit question you retard, especially when religious zealots have hijacked the political system! Fucking MORON! I don't want to vote for some Idiot who plainly rejects all the Scientific research and observation that exists in favor of Evolution! Stupid fuck!!

  • @deeppurple28 I think he was saying that the "debate" (even though it isn't really when one side has evidence and the other has book), isn't something he will pick a side on. He said he personally believes in creationism but he also said he would like to discuss the issue. Remember he was born in Texas, and was most definitely raised a hard core christian, so you must give him some lee way in that respect. But I will agree to the idea that he should support evolution.

  • This is a totally relevant question, because a belief in evolution is going to solve the national debt crisis.

  • @deeppurple28 he's not ignoring all scientific research...he's a DOCTOR. He obviously done a lot of research if he's that smart, if you researched. Show him a little respect. He's fighting for liberty, freedom, peace and FOR YOU. No other candidate is doing that. Besides if he doesn't want to believe he doesn't have to. It's still a theory. I've studied it. If HIS personal beliefs are making you not to vote for him then you can kiss America goodbye because he's the only sane candidate.

  • he is not a religious zealot. he has hardly even mentioned religion in these debates, and doesnt force his views on anyone [like santorum or bachmann has]. these are his beliefs. and i dont believe that mankind evolved from apes either.

    he is a doctor, and educated .. and not believing in the 'theory' of evolution, which is not a fact, does not make him any less qualified to lead.

    not believing in human evolution has not hindered scientific development and progress i might add ...

  • @Communist2012 A "theory" in the scientific field is the highest level of validity possible. I'm guessing you accept the gravity theory and the germ theory. The only reason the evolution theory is controversial is because it goes against deeply-held superstitions and creation stories. It's not a matter of believing it, it's a matter of understanding it.

  • @PushThePariah i have no problem with evolution, i only have a problem with one part of it - human evolution

    i dont believe we evolved from apes, otherwise i am fine with everything else.

  • @Communist2012 So you openly admit that animals evolve and that evolution is happening, but humans don't? We evolve, just like all other animals. Why don't you believe in human evolution? No one claims we come from modern apes, we both came from an apelike ancestor, but are branching in different paths.

  • @PushThePariah my religion doesnt have conflicts with evolution, it only has a conflict with human evolution. on this part i agree with the christians that man did not have ape like ancestors.

  • @PushThePariah why do you atheists have such a hardon for the theory of evolution ? look at the Large hadron colliders recent results that disprove einsteins theory, CERN claims findings which would disprove Einstein's theory of relativity

    keep an open mind. things that people believe are fact now, can be shown to be wrong in the future as science develops

    anything is possible, ok ?

  • @Communist2012 I do have an open mind. The things that people believed were facts are shown to be wrong right now by science. It doesn't develop, we just understand more and more. We used to believe the earth was flat, now we know it's a sphere-like shape. We're not going to one day find out that the eath is actually a triangle. We have witnessed evolution take place, and there is proof for it. Just because anything is possible, doesn't mean facts shouldn't be ignored.

  • "The federal reserve destroys money, you know what that means? it means our standard of living will have to go down, that's what it means."

    Murray Sabrin  (Finance Professor and US Senate candidate)

  • This is a phenomenon that seems to only happen in the USA that I will never understand, when a smart, educated person can deny a scientific fact so supported by evidence that it can be called a FACT, and half the country supports him on it. how does such a smart person hold an opinion that is so utterly and obviously stupid?

  • “The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers.”

    - Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936), US Congressman (R-PA) (1915-1935), Chairman of House Banking and Currency Committee, Speech in Congress, June 10, 1932. Poisoned in 1936.

  • “Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government’s institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers (Congressional Record 12595-12603).”

    - Louis T. McFadden (1876-1936), US Congressman (R-PA) (1915-1935), POISONED

  • "My personal view is that recognizing the validity of an evolutionary process does not support atheism nor should it diminish ones view about god and the universe. From this view this is a debate about science and religion and I wish it could be more civil and should not involve politicians at all."

    Ron Paul

  • Ron Paul obviously doesn't understand the difference between a hypothesis and a scientific theory.

    Thankfully poll results show that Ron Paul has no chance of winning the Republican nomination.

    That's not a hypothesis ... that's a fact.

  • @jessie74 The federal reserve is owned by internationalist aristocrats who have been robbing everyone in this country blind.  inflation is a tax by aristocrats and your to dumb to do anything about it

    That's not a hypothesis.... THAT'S A FACT.

  • @Browncatpaw provide evidence then.

  • @InnerSmile72 The evidence is in the congress reports and quotes of congressman, mayors, presidents, and in the history of america's war against the european central bankers since the declaration of independence. Lots of well down youtube video's now teaching the history of and exposing the federal reserve for what it is, a private bank of european aristocracy, the exact thing the founding fathers tried to break away from and warned against.

  • @Browncatpaw So you choose quotes as your evidence? The context of all of these is not for your bizarre conspiracy theory. I feel like I've unfortunately given someone with a mental problem too much attention. 21 replies to one post, and you still didn't give any evidence, just statements from other people tl:dr, the first one I read was a made up quote by a conspiracy theorist. Epic fail.

  • @InnerSmile72 Your lit is glowin dim darlin, bulb must be burnt out. Those quotes with the exception of the philospher Robert Anton Wilson, Are all the words of your leaders and they are all refering to the federal reserve....if you can't see that there's nothing I can do for ya, enjoy your self imposed ignorance. You couldnt comment on any of the others huh? you dont care about the truth...you just wanna be right when your so so wrong...You asked for evidence....and all you can to is insult.

  • @InnerSmile72  Its funny how you call actual quotes about reality from your leaders "conspiracy".....that's got to be the definition of ignorance, you got a heavy dose of the dumb dumbs

  • @Browncatpaw I'm not reading your wall of text, your "Gish Gallop" you're disgusting running of your mouth and poisoning of the conversation. 1) You will not admit there is no evidence Colby said that about the CIA owning the media. ADMIT IT!! You won't you fucking batshit insane asshole. Gish Gallop is what you did. Comprehensive debunking of you.publiceye{dotorg]/conspire­/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html p.s. (replace the [dotorg] with .org, I know you're a moron at this point. Good luck kid

  • @InnerSmile72 FACT! the federal reserve is a private corporation owned by european bankers, started in 1913. Deny it all you want, but its not even a secret, your ignorant and your rude. Good Riddance

  • @Browncatpaw So what we've hot lots of batshit insane senators. I have quotes of a senator saying the world is 6000 years old does that make it true? You clearly have not thought this true and have been infected by a virus of belief. I suggest you get off the internet, get back to nature for awhile, remember what you were like before these strange beliefs came into your mind. Look at the other side, read Shermer's books and challenge yourself at least, before you continue this descent into death

  • @InnerSmile72 So now anyone who knows the federal reserve is a private company believes the world was created 6000 years ago? Nice try lol Guess Alan Greenspan is batshit crazy to just like President Wilson, Roosevelt, Madison, Garfield, Lincoln, Kennedy, Jefferson and Jackson.

    "Well first of all the federal reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that ah there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take."

    Alan Greenspan

  • @Browncatpaw My point was that people saying their beliefs, especially a long time ago, doesn't mean a) that's in context to your beliefs b) they weren't crazy too. To say that it is a private, for-profit enterprise is bullshit. No one makes money off it. It's a special organization detailed described in that link. And fiat money kicks the gold standard's ass. Now please reply to me admitting that Colby never said that quote and you parroted things you read because you didn't know better (yet)

  • @InnerSmile72 You can take back the Colby quote its unverified...but that in no way discredits all the other wonderful quotes i posted ( okay "maybe" the bush ones were out of context...but i belief in freudian slips) The quotes by the presidents, mayors, senators, and congressman about bankers, secret societies and the federal reserve are alarming and your answer which basically amounts to "the presidents are all nut-bars.. the federal reserve is run by angels for the people" is unconvincing

  • @Browncatpaw "In no way discredits the other wonderful quotes I posted" Yes it does you bleeding idiot! You planted a completely fabricated quote into 21 posts of spam, I didn't even read the rest because what's the point? You haven't even explored context! Your behavior of posting 21 quotes was not only spam and stupid as a strategy ( you make rP look way worse than he is) you haven't even fucking tried to verify them yourself what an immature piece of shit.

  • @InnerSmile72 "Well first of all the federal reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take."

    Alan Greenspan

    "Inflation is a tax" Bernake

    THOSE TWO STATEMENTS MORE THEN SUGGEST THAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS 1) PRIVATE 2) FOR PROFIT

  • @Browncatpaw That's your insane viewpoint. Where does the money go? It goes back into the treasury. Bet you didn't even know that... fool

  • @InnerSmile72 You should watch "Murray Sabrin: The Federal Reserve is a Sam" on you tube he's a finance Professor and US Senate candidate, he knows alot more about the federal reserve then you do.....he's the most articulate critic of the Federal Reserve out there....and he say's its a scam.........educate yourself..... or shut up

  • @InnerSmile72 I'll check out Shermer, looks interesting, I actually always look at both sides I'm just having fun. But look at history and you know what? When it comes to money and power...shit does happen.. there are psychopaths out there ambitious men of no conscience, great charm and gifts of manipulation, I've met a few. As neitzche say's "this world is the will to power and nothing besides."

  • @Browncatpaw I know that you're "just having fun" because people who are mature and experienced about these issues actually do their research instead of parroting things that propagandists put together on the internet. You can do nothing to justify your conspiracism. Idiots like you always say "just asking questions" no that's a cop out. It's immoral to stir up shit without having absolute proof or have an evidenced case of understanding not just 20 something quotes out of context and reality

  • @InnerSmile72 What does an idiot like yourself think about Bill Clinton being mentored by Historian Carroll Quigley who was in the globalist secret society and wrote about them and their goals in Tragedy @ Hope? Assuming you even know about this, but you probably have no clue.

  • @InnerSmile72 So your theory seems to be that the money printers used to be ruthless, corrupt and demonically greedy as is evidenced by the actually quotes of past presidents such as Madison, Garfield, Jefferson, Jackson. But now since 1913 and the basically covert addition of the federal reserve against the will of the people, all the money printers are angelic beings and family men who mind their own business and have no interest what so ever in a global government and economy. Fair enough

  • @InnerSmile72 So its immoral to post quotes of what past presidents, congressman, senators, and mayors have said about international bankers and the federal reserve? Okay man i'll try to be deaf dumb and blind but it doesn't come as easy to me as it does to you :) allright i'm done lol

  • @Browncatpaw no you should do your research and stop parroting things you find on the internet because it means you aren't being careful and concerned enough about how you try and influence your fellow human beings. Let's say some other kid believes you on that quote, now he assumes the CIA runs all the media. The kid's mind was poisoned by your actions on the internet. It took me 5 seconds to debunk that quote Fuck you

  • @Browncatpaw Actually we call it JAQ'ing off. Just asking questions man!" "Hey you know there was thermite in the dust of the towers and the Jews in the tower were told not to go to work that day but we're Just Asking Questions dude!" It's something we love to make fun of. And you just did it. That's embarrasing! ;)

  • @InnerSmile72 Nice way to spin it and somehow try to make me into some jew hater when I never even mentioned jewish people dick. Your mix of kindergarten twists of logic to try and slander me and prima donna arrogance is makin me think you probably arent mentally capable of understanding the minds of the elite. So when Bernanke say's "Inflation is a tax" you think the price of everything has been going up to fix roads and stop signs lol

  • @Browncatpaw You keep making the mistakes of me using examples of conspiracy theory or crackpot logic and attributing them to you. The point is that it's no different, your views are just as crackpot and it sounds just as crazy. All conspiracy theories are offensive on some level, you're accusing a lot of people of being in on a disgusting conspiracy here too. So far you haven't addressed my point about that.

  • @Browncatpaw Actually we call it "JAQ'ing off "Just asking questions man!" Hey you know there was thermite in the dust of the towers and the Jews in the tower were told not to go to work that day but we're Just Asking Questions dude! It's something we love to make fun of. And you just did it.

  • @InnerSmile72 The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson — and I am not wholly excepting the Administration of W. W. The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States — only on a far bigger and broader basis.

    Franklin_D._Roosevelt

    Letter to Col. Edward Mandell House (21 November 1933); His Personal Letters, 1928-1945,

  • @InnerSmile72 “The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses… This little coterie…runs our government for their own selfish ends.

    John F. Hylan (1868-1936) Mayor of New York

  • @InnerSmile72 "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling the money and its issuance." President James Madison

  • @InnerSmile72

    “Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.”

    James A. Garfield (1831-1881), President.

  • @InnerSmile72 "The regional Federal Reserve banks are not government agencies. ...but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations." -- Lewis vs. United States, 680 F. 2d 1239 9th Circuit 1982

  • @InnerSmile72 "A great industrial nation is controlled by it's system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world-- no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." President Woodrow Wilson 1913

  • @InnerSmile72 "Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation...but can't, (won't)

    support the drastic reforms to stop it (repeal of the Federal Reserve Act) because it could cost him his job."

    "Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed." Robert A. Heinlein,

  • @InnerSmile72 “The Federal Reserve Board and banks are the duly appointed agents of foreign central banks. They are more concerned with their foreign customers than they are with the people of the United States. Their plan is to create a system of financial and political control of every nation and economy of the world.”

    1931, Rep. Louis T. McFadden

  • @InnerSmile72 The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

    Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976,

  • “By making money artificially scarce, interest rates throughout the country can be arbitrarily raised and the bank tax on all business and cost of living increased for the profit of the banks owning these regional central banks, and without the slightest benefit to the people. These 12 corporations (Federal Reserve) together cover the whole country and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency, and all public revenues of the United States” Alfred Crozier 1863-1939

  • @InnerSmile72 “Congressman, I couldn’t agree with you more that inflation is a tax and that inflation is currently too high…”

    - Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve (2006-), admitting that inflation is a tax while being questioned by Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX), Monetary Policy and The State of the Economy hearing before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, July 16, 2008.

  • @InnerSmile72 “The bank, is trying to kill me, but I will kill it! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God I will rout you out.”

    - Andrew Jackson (1767-1845), President, After he dissolved the Second National Bank of America (banks were granted twenty year charters to print money) there was an attempt on his life.

  • @InnerSmile72 Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

    - Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924)President The New Freedom, 1913

  • @InnerSmile72 "By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft."

    British Lord John Maynard Keynes (the father of 'Keynesian Economics' which our nation now endures) in his book "THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE PEACE" (1920).

  • @InnerSmile72 "The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.''

    J. Edgar Hoover Quote (The first director of the FBI)

  • @InnerSmile72 "I now fully realize that only the powers of the presidency will reveal the secrets of my brothers death."

    Robert Kennedy, June 3, 1968, two days before he was assassinated

  • @InnerSmile72 "The more I have learned, the more concerned I have become that the government was involved in the assassination of the President John F. Kennedy."

    Victor Marchetti, former Executive Assistant to the Deputy Director of the CIA, quoted in TRUE magazine, April 1975

  • @InnerSmile72 "There ought to be limits to freedom."—George W. Bush, news conference, May 21, 1999

  • @InnerSmile72 "You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror."

    George Bush, CBS News interview, September 6, 2006

  • @InnerSmile72 "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

    Director of Central Intelligence from 1973-1976 (replaced by george bush)

  • Yeah, thats right! he doesn't take that evolutionist BULLSHITT

  • Had to remove 3 comments cause of typos btw.. my bad. I tryed to post the same message 3 times lol

  • Ron Paul is not your typical evolutiontist and is not your typical creationist, but people dont understand philosophic subtleties they dont even listen to what he says, they just attack calling names, thinking they know what he says, but most important he says over and over what he personally beliefs doesnt matter and yet even that part is over their heads...

  • "My personal view is that recognizing the validity of an evolutionary process does not support atheism nor should it diminish ones view about god and the universe. From this view this is a debate about science and religion and I wish it could be more civil and should not involve politicians at all."

    Ron Paul

  • It is no surprise that we should see the fulfilment of phrophecy today:

    Psa 14:1 The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."

    2Pe 3:3-4 First of all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. They will say, "Where is this 'coming' he promised? Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation." For this they willingly are ignorant of ... ("willingly ignorant" means 'dumb on purpose')

    

  • I didn't realise Ron Paul was a creationist. What a shame.

  • @mumpump Why is it a shame I think every american president has stated belief in a higher power, in his own way so did Albert Einstien?

  • @Browncatpaw I'm not talking about his belief in a 'higher power' I'm talking about the ABSURD!!! belief that the earth was created about 6000 years ago with all the fossil records and dinosaur bones already in place to "test our faith" . MY God some people are ignorant. don't get me started on creationism...

  • @mumpump I never heard Ron Paul say the earth was created 6000 years ago lol

  • @Browncatpaw Well that's good then because I got a lot of respect for Ron. But evolution is a FACT not merely a theory. Creationists have their heads up their holes - that's also a FACT.

  • I really don't think ron paul is denying natural selection, he's having an overall philosophical discussion not a biological one. Many men and woman feel there's a spiritual reality underpinning the physical, a divine ineffeable love. I don't know why people are acting so shocked and outraged, its not like he even really wants to talk about it never mind make you all conform to it. People who want to study evolution do it! people who want to pray do it! disrespecting each other is stupid