Dubweiser Golf GTI MK1 turbo 750+BHP

[chumyltz400]

You'd wana be in sum scooby ta beat tat yolk holy fuck all them hp's in tat lil yolk

[alfistii1]

How many VW owners know the MK1 Golf was an Italian car?

The original Mk1 was penned by Giorgetto Giugiaro in the 1970's for vw.

He left BERTONE to form ITALDESIGN.

[dogodud]

@alfistii1 So in other words it Rabbit was penned by a Giorgetto Giugiaro, a contractor, for VW, so how exactly it is Italian car?

[rubbax27]

@dogodudits obvi german but because it was designed but giorgetto an italian it was the best of both german engineiering with italian styling hope i helped u out

[G60EXTREM]

@alfistii1 thats correct!

[ethangey]

and the aero is pile of wank considering it'd die going around a corner

[ethangey]

@ p8ntballcracker how does america win? BUGATTI'S ENGINE WAS A FUCKING ITALIAN INVENTION ANYWAY

[H34thD3W4yn3]

HOLY JESUS TITTIES!

[001whitelighter]

that's wrx on right lol it got beaten by golf 1

[purpleGoAhead]

what a great sound! i think 5-cylinders do really have the second-best sound of all engine-layouts out there right after a 3-rotor rotary (20B) especially a bridgeported one!

[ivbeenshot]

sounds hateful must be a 5 cyl

[eggfromsywell]

@ivbeenshot Yeah, it's got the engine and running gear from an audi S2 wedged into it, thats why it's got the wide arches to try and widen the track to fit the S2 running gear in

[joakimkn1]

The sweet sound of a 2,5 litre 5cyl turbocharged audi engine. Probably got 5-600 hp there

[OoShinkooO]

Definetly Not a vr6.. I know what my engine sounds like.. But Still fast as hell! And any car that has 650+ HP can never be considered Boring.

[elbowka]

in-line 5! i've got a few of them...

[redible]

no vr6 thats bullshit!!!!!!!!! it sounds like 5 cylindre turbo

[GhostRiderrrrrr]

you´re right;)

[MLN1337]

sounds like vr6 engine... boring ~.+

[420witchdoctor]

VR6? BORING? You're an idiot.

[MLN1337]

No 750 HP with VR6 engine is boring. 2L 16Vvalve would be more amazing ;)

[420witchdoctor]

How so? Explain why it would be better when they have the same power. Oh, and fyi, VR6 has MUCH better torque than the 16v. I've been working on VWs for over 11 years.

[edawg305]

theres plenty of 03-04 cobras runnin 10's on street tires with just boltons no nos.

[svrle65]

it's 650 hp gti turbo not 750 hp asshole

[1poopshoot]

dude in the crowd is a FAAAAGGGGG

[edawg305]

lol 750 hp and running 10s???? so sad theres 500 hp v8s running 10s

[garhailija]

show me one 500hp v8 car which runs 10 in non-glued track with street tires.

[jannisSTREET]

wow 750 hp and it manages to look that boring

[rubbax27]

omg i am doing the same thing 2 my golf mk1 when i get it 20v t quattro from audi s2 pure beast

[m0ogy]

I've known Grant for many years ,lives a few miles from me.I saw this car about 8 years ago when he was building it and it was red....It has a 20V Audi Quattro motor, AWD and a masive turbo and NOS..........a true petrol head........DAVE

[kevlad564]

Its full 4wd. not had it out this year due to other ongoing projects but lets see what next year brings. Grant is a good friend of mine so i speak with a good degree of knowledge. it's definitely an inline 5 cylinder engine.

[georgeBMXER]

im sorry does anyone know if it has been converted to AWD or RWD.. because it has extremely good grip to pull off a time like it did let alone beat a AWD rexy haha....by the way ima huge fan of mk1 =D check out my video on them

[dee18f]

Yes, it has the 5 cylinder quattro running gear. On one of my dvd's at home, think it was at the TOTB meeting lol amazin!

[xieper]

Not the fast road legal Mk1 anymore....

[adam21011987]

sorry to piss on your chips , but its a much modified 20 valve 5 clyinder from an audi s2 i believe

[G60EXTREM]

search for grant parker ... you will see its 5 cylinder !

[izzycroptik]

No I recognise the sound. That's definitely a VR6 engine. It's a 6-cylinder turbo VW engine

[kramerbuccs24]

that sounds NOTHING like a vr6, 12v or 24v.

[saxosmasher]

Defo the roar of the 5 cylinder audi without a doubt.

[redible]

no vr6 man, thats definitely 5 cyl audi engine

[izzycroptik]

Ooook, seems that I'm wrong... damn

[KAULAMANS]

i just heard the 5cylinder audi engine?or its my idea???

[G60EXTREM]

no youre right , thats a quattro based mk1 with 5-cyl. !!!

[frostycunt82]

who gives a fuck a good car lasts a long time and does high mileage becomes a classic and vw seem very good at making these cars.

[joehunt1980]

wow you guys are geeks, just drive your cars and enjoy the videos!

[yorkie337]

the scooby gets it off the line

[ender2win]

dubweiser always gives headstarts

[singersac]

Ha you can hear it just wheelspin into third

[danelio]

we all know what the i5 is capable of. many race cars use it. i use it. inline 5's have an awesome power band. my car peeks tq at 2000 rpms all the way to 5000 rpms.

[GTI1dasOriginal]

"time of the day for grandpa" LOL!

[tontonsteve]

japenese car suck u know?

fast n furious (est commendité par une bande de chinois

[jaysmith333]

im gay

[warrock175]

omg thats my dads unkles sun bloody hell

[xraycortina]

There is a replacement for displacement, it's called european engineering.

Worst case scenario might be the old Buick-designed 'Rover V8' which had around 3500cc and managed to push out 95bhp in the Range Rover.

Americans are great at designing low-bhp high-displacement engines. Yes, they can be modified (as will no doubt be pointed out by some yankee doodle dumbass) but European engines will always be superior regarding bhp per cc.

ps not all citizens of the usa are thick, some are ok.

[usermanname]

You sir, are an idiot (btw consider me a yankee doodle dumbass). The whole hp per cc line is old as dinosaur crap. More power's more power. If you make 500 hp with 3.4 liters of flat 6 and I make 750 hp with 8 liters of v8 that means I'm up 250 hp over you. Besides, one could argue that adding another atmosphere to 3.4 liters makes it a 6.8. So, the earlier statement stands correct. There is no replacement for displacement.

[xraycortina]

usermanname:

In response to, and quoting from your comment:

3.4 litres, flat 6, 500 bhp = 0.147 bhp per cc

8 litres, v8, 750 bhp = 0.094 bhp per cc

Thus, by your own statement, the european engine wins. Thus, European engineering beats USA displacement.

[usermanname]

xraycortina,

you have proven my point that you are an idiot. 750 hp is 250 more than 500. Thus, and pay attention, the 8 liter v8 makes MORE power. 250 hp more to be specific. So if you have a 3000 lb car with 500 hp and a 3000 lb car with 750 hp, both set up similarly I would be willing to bet that the 750 hp car would outrun the 500 hp car. If I could draw you a picture on here I would as it appears you need the help. HOW, in your world, does a 500 hp engine beat a 750 hp engine?

[xraycortina]

For f***s sake:

The point concerns power output relative to engine size.

Your 8 litre engine has 235.3% of the displacement of a 3.4 litre engine but only produces 150% of its BHP.

Therefore, it is less efficient relative to its size.

It would appear that we aren't going to agree on this, so perhaps it would be better to open the debate to public opinion.

Comments please.

[usermanname]

I agree, for f***s sake:

one point I am willing to concede, a smaller engine is capable of being more efficient due to less internal friction, BUT the smaller engine is incapable of creating the power that a larger engine can create, all things being equal. That is my point. So power per liter is a stupid argument when a larger engine makes more overall power, even if it makes less per cubic inch. I personaly am done with this argument, but thanks for playing.

[xraycortina]

Me too. Let's shake hands.

[benlukkie]

Liked the 'discussion' but IMHO it should be about power/weight, that's what makes one faster than the other.. Power/volume is an economy issue.. not very suitable for dragracing

[panthertattoo]

i get what you mean,

like the 3.4 makes more bhp for its size so if the 3.4 where to be made 8.0 then the bhp would be far higher than the (american) 8.0 v8,

the 8.0 v8 may have more power now granted but thats due to the fact its alot higher litre, if that same engines litre was say...downgraded to 3.4 then the bhp would be far less than the euro engine lol

[dike27]

dude... thats not how it works. American car companies can make small powerful engines too. Just look at the new cobalt ss. inefficiency increases the bigger the engine, making your little comparison completely irrelevant.

[m3andygard]

I have just looked at the spec for the Cobalt SS. Its Turbocharged. Every 1 bar boost effectivly increases the swept volume by 2X ! !

Its 2 litres turbo and can only manage 260HP !

M3's are over 100hp/litre normally aspirated.

The Honda Vtec engines can also manage this.

European cars of around 2litres has that power in the 80's if they were turbocharged.

Audi Quatro

Sierra Cosworth

Lotus Esprit

Do Americans make normally aspirated cars with 111HP/litre like the Germans do!

Think not ...

[dike27]

ok well the cobalt ss is still making 130 hp/L. I dont care if its turbocharged, and how did you come up with each bar of boost doubling horsepower?? You have to remember cost here, it is way more expensive to make power out of N/A and BMW can afford that and its reflected in the price. no BMW cost's 23,000 new. And if they did make one, they sure as hell wouldn't have a naturally aspirated one making over 100 hp/L. So therefore HONDA is better than BMW. that seems to be your thinking...

[lucasscaife]

@xraycortina you dont know jack all m8 i own a VW TRANSPORTER SPORTLINE i ended up buying an audi R8 engine V10 and put it in the boot My van now has 510BHP and makes me laugh when people try to challenge me porsche boxers and then i rev the engine lol their faces

[nck22511]

@lucasscaife I think you mean Porsche Boxster, You got vids of your Transporter up?

[fatboyslinky]

@lucasscaife Did you then wake up and have your corn flakes?

[ImRichRu]

POWER BAND ON THE V8 WILL OWN YOUr LITTLE INLINE 5.

peak hp is only a small portion of the usable power

its not a flat 6 its a audi I5

[p8ntballcracker]

@xraycortina @xraycortina or we can look at:

ulitmate aero tt

6.35 litres, v8, 2 turbos, 1,183 hp

(388 cu in)

------------------------------­---

bugatti veyron

8 litres, W16, 4 turbos, 1,001hp

(487.8 cu in)

now do the math... AMERICA WINS AGAIN yay

[m0nkey1eader]

@xraycortina Turbo vs NA while only looking at the displacement is not exactly a fair comparison...

Compressed engines are essentially adding displacement.

[guardian1977]

no matter what other people say about your car (that they own a faster one....yeah right 99.8% are liars here) i think you did a great job with that gti. impresive

[MorePOwerplz]

Is that quattro equipped?

[sismani]

Aaahh that 5cylinder audi engine...Awsome sound

[kaulogiatros]

German Power!!!

[MatsiSchatzi]

first time hes shifting a little too slow

but nod bad man

[Snrby]

That's a very disapointing time for a 750bhp golf. My brother's 600bhp VL used to run low 10's on streets, and it's got atleast 1t worth of extra weight to push around.

[gti1000bhp]

of course it did, lets see the evidence, and i hope you are not on a glued track in the states!

[WoolfmanCFC]

srnby your a twat!

[nsfu19]

nice audi engine sounds like a beast,and i bet it is killer to drive!

[themk2man]

Typical!

Being american, Every car you own is always a 10sec car.

[Kornball426]

There's a lot of ten second cars in the states... It doesn't take much. In the right chassis a cheap motor can put you in the tens. Like a back halfed and caged Fox mustang with a stroker 351w and a big shot of nitrous, or a properly turbo'd 302 or 351. Or if you really want to go to the effort, you could set it up for a built 460.

[themk2man]

Now show me how many of these 10second cars are under 2.5l capacity?

My guess? under 5%

[MaioraniDM]

Wrong, every car we own are 9 sec cars ;)

[themk2man]

Wrong, Your all just dumb americans!

If it aint a V8 u dont wanna know!!

[dexxy45]

actually i'm english and own a mk3 fiesta WITH A 1.1 KENT ENGINE IN that i'm doing up, but i love big block 502 cheveys, i'm looking at if its possible to stick a 350 small block with a GMPP transaxle in the front of my fiesta, trying to make an awsome sub 10 second front wheel drive car, if that fails i'll stick a 440 mopar in the boot driving rear wheels and make a sub 8 second car :)

AINT NO REPLACMENT FOR DISPLACMENT!!!

[themk2man]

A kent engine? A 40 year old design CVH then?

Sounds like you've got an old tapetty 1.1 fiesta mk3. Notorious little rust boxes...

I think your dreaming son...

[golfvr6charged]

@ Dexxy45 Actully there is a replacement for displacement its called boost ;)

[luke081988]

Thats what i like to see!

[rodgazinya]

crazy, sounds sick......

[GTLgamer]

definitely an inline-5 20 valve audi engine in it due to the sound... superb!

[xeronicus]

I'm reminded of the audi sport quattro s1...:evil grin:

[arfurjohnson]

its a tuned audi unit thats in it

[tuningTR34]

oooooo my good :D very very nice :)

[whirly03]

inline 5 correct in the front

[harleyharleyharleyha]

iv seen that golf at york raceway the engine is in the boot!

[volkswagendevwil]

whoooa!! :)

[kruky]

sounds a bit like a audi inline-5 turbo or a vr6