so basically there are jews and muhamedist, atheists and others who worship flesh. and bhuddists and christians and hindus and muslims who worship spirit so when you say mutation are you talking about blacks turning white when they move to europe or some dumb crap like that
Why does this song only have 4 stars? This easily deserves 5 stars, fucking cretinist (creationist).. I already know those IDiots had something to do tainting the ratings.
Evolution is a FACT, get over it creationist. Also this song OWNS, even though I don't believe the "missing link" is a spiritual entity, good song nonetheless, LCOB always bring that good shit, lyrical super giants. Wish they would collaborate with Canibus, that would be epic
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
lol Lost Shilldren of Babylon/Egypt is wack pro black mystery school bs. their lyrics filled with Nuwaubian teachings of Dr. Malachi Z. York. Same bs all mystery schools teach the only diff is this is black supremacist movement.
I dont know when everybody is going to understand. NOBODY will KNOW anything about anything. We only gather and relay the information but we will neve know whats true but we do know what is a lie. And the lie is religion and what the media presents the world to be with money and physical existence.
why dont you 2 fucks stop arguin whos smarter over a baddass youtube video you both dont have shit to prove to eachother, if you know your smart then thats it... POST THE FUCKING KLYRICS
I mean I'm discussing something with someone over what they have been told by someone else, maybe I should just google his/her words and find the person actually responsible for doing the work. Oh my now that's acting just like Coolatheist
"You are basically saying I am incapable of thinking for myself because I accept 2+2=4.. And I sense the irony in your last statement, very humurous"
Inductive Arguement, you're implying that what you're saying is completely precise, to the point, were you not to accept your arguement, you would have the inability to perceive the outcome of 2 + 2. As if there is no other option other than what you have displayed
Now where did I say anything about the universe formation? And the abscence of L-guluno gamma lactone oxidate is completely precise, and there are no other alternatives.. What don't you get about this? It is a FACT that we have this pseudogene, just like 2+2=4 is a FACT.. What is so hard to understand about that?
It's AN automaton, not a automaton... And is automaton your word for the day? That's cute.. I just love the fact you have yet to answer one of my questions? If you cannot answer my questions, I totally understand, you aren't the brightest crayon in the box
No AN is past tense, and of course you have yet to learn anything from this entire conversation, I'm not the brightest crayon in the box, but I will always be that color brighter than you.
Wow you are dumber then I thought, and that is saying a lot.. "An" goes before any word which commences with a vowel (a, e, i, o, u), with exceptions (automaton NOT being one of those exceptions).. That is third grade grammar.. Or is that not a fact neither, hahaha.. No wonder you don't understand pseudogenes, you can't even grasp third grade grammar.. Sorry for bothering you, I didn't mean to hurt the three brain cells in that thick skull of yours, I apologize
Don't try derail and divert, English grammar is only a fact if you believe the English language is the oldest in the world seeing as you believe Christainity to be the main focal of your "problems" I wouldn't blame you. Here's a small hint ... It was only made up by a man, from another language now that MAY be to hard for you to understand, seeing as you can't think just recite what you've been told, know the difference.
Nice red herring fallacy you incorporated.. It doesn't matter if the English language was first or last, "an" still goes before a word which starts with a vowel.. And how is English grammar a fact if someone believes it is the oldest language.. Other languages that came before English has the same principles... All language is made up by man, wtf are you talking about? Languages evolve, just as species do
Wrong again, see if you actually looked at different languages you'd know that's not always the case I'm part Chinese and I've studied Japanese Hiragana and romanji, it's the complete opposite of the English language, verbs are stated first, then nouns and pronouns, Also languages do not improve over time any idiot who's studied history knows how advanced the Hebrew Torah was where every letter and word was also a number, try again.0
Did I say every single language have the same principles? No, I said "other".. Also evolution=/=improving.. I never said language has improved, I said they evolved. They are not synonymous, so how about you try again
Fail attempt to make up for your lack information, I love how sly and subtle you try to act by finding the smallest loophole in what you say and try to apply it. You knew you meant all other languages when you said that, all languages don't follow the same principles and some do not "evolve" they remain at a point where they are so complex they can't really change, the basic form of "language" will always be emotions, and body expressions
"Falied" attempt, not fail.. Oh, the English language came last so the English grammar doesn't exist.. Haha.. And if you don't know the difference between others and all, then I feel sorry for you, really I do..If I meant "all other", I would have said that.. And all languages evolve, not whatever religious reason you want to believe, whether it is the tower of babylon, or whatever you want to believe in.. How do you think language originated?
How retarded are you? Just because I think there was some creation involved does NOT repeat NOT make you religious, I'm against religions you moron, I'm not some college brainwashed puppet with someone elses thinking pattern, The simple fact is you never knew what "you" mean or will ever know. I'm pretty sure language started firsty as pictures carved, you may only be aetheist because you think it's cool or something most likely I'm 100 percent sure someone talked or influenced you into it.
" many creation stories say that the earth was at one time flooded, scientific proof proves that at a time the earth was completely covered in water"
"I know mankind was made more than once and the Earth has been destroyed more than once, After the flood God tells "Noah to replenisht the Earth" and he also tells adam and Eve to "replenish the Earth"
So you believe in creation, Adam and Eve, and a great flood, but are not religious? You are the retard
I was obiviously using examples, usually If a lot of different cultures all agree or tell the same thing that usually means there's something to it. Here's an idea how about you stop letting your Professor pump your head full of shit he doesn't understand to another idiot who doesn't understand but just accepts it? I said I believed in a creation religion and creation do not have to be linked. Going by what I've been saying about you it appears I've been hitting the nail on the head everytime
Thanks for the compliment, but how does that have anything to do with that retarded statement about the English language, I'm here to discuss not have a rock throwing contest with an elementary school drop-out.
If everything in existance relied on some chance happening of "infinite possibilites", the chances for there being "infinite failures" of nothing are much more likely and would repeat an infinite ammount of times, to the point where nothing would progress because it would always collapse on itself. The possibility of causing self destruction would override anything, as 1 simple chemical failure would cause nothing to exist, I-don't-think-you-people-have-a-grasp-on-just-how-delicate this is.
Sadly, the more knowledge you gain and the more you understand ... you realize that evolution is impossible, the Universe is incredibly complex beyond human understanding, just as a building is built upon bricks and is structured and layered so is the universe ... theres no way this all just happened at a chance ...
Evolution is not impossible, and the teleological argument has been debunked a plethora of times.. Also you should look up the fallacy "argumentum ad ignorantiam" which states basically what you asserted.. Evolution is a fact, and has mountains of evidence to back it up
Giving the mathematics and ratios of chance and miracle happenings for evolution to take place ... I would say it would be impossible without some driving force directing it to be the way it is. Again I say Science disproves pure evolution, math disproves pure evolution, evolution is not a fact, but just a more of a myth of people believing the earth was square and the center of the universe
Remember what I said about having knowledge and actual wisdom? You seem to have 0 knowledge and 0 wisdom since its all regurtitated crap from other people, which don't really have a concept of the Universe, its more mathimatical, again I'm going to say science easily disproves pure evolution.
The only one who has no clue what they are talking about is you, you really can't understand what you're reading if you're only looking at one view point of the infomation you weren't even inspired enough by to try to actually research on your own, I've been in astronomy over 13 years, I've been in geology over 4 years, I've actually studied things other than simply eat whats ever fed to me, even though I don't even understand the persons research nor ever will.
Microcephalin is a gene in which regulates brain size, mostly responsible for the neocortex (which means new covering in Latin.).. Microcephalin underwent positive selection. And they found this out by comparing genetic sequences of ethnically and geographically diverse people and found polymorphisms (sequence difference). They analyzed the polymorohism and calculated a genetic variant of microcephalin which arose 37,000 years ago, which happens to coincide with the emergence of culturally
(cont).. modern humans .. So if humans were created in one day with full brains, why does this gene say otherwise? And there are other genes that prove this as well.. CDK2RAP5, CENJ5, ASPM, Sonic Hedgehod, fox1, fox2 genes etc
Created in one day? Still sticking to your christainity beliefs huh? Theres hundreds of creation stories, that are actually more well put together than the Bible ... and even if you accept the Bible I remember it being that the "day" was 1000 years to the Hebrew God. Scientists don't like admitting we don't really know, so we have the pure evolution myth, hence everything, EVERYTHING bends toward a formed structure. I've never found a Star or cluster formation randomly move itself
Like the Yanomamo Sanema creation story, where they believe we "evolved" from a spirit from a forest? Or Lord Brahma and how he grows lonely and splits into male and female, and the beliefs of reincarnation? Muslims creation story is similar to Christianity, which they believed to take place 5770 BCE.. Or the P'an Ku creation story.. Also the "day" meaning a thousand years has been discredited by many theistic scholars
I don't believe in any of them as they aren't scientific enough to believe in, theres more theories about creation than just the simple "magical being putting us here"
Its only a story, the point is generally to find similarties between them all which might point to actually scientific evidence, many creation stories say that the earth was at one time flooded, scientific proof proves that at a time the earth was completely covered in water
I have been researching and reading scientific journals, after scientific journals the past couple of weeks, and in not one of them said "looking in the mirror" is evidence against evolution.. how is that even falsifiable.. Your statement was 100% unscientific.. Now can you please give me evidence that evolution is false.. I gave you evidence with the ASPM, microcephalin, CENJ2, CDK5RAP2 genes, which we know underwent positive selection. So give me some scientific evidence why evolution is false
You can use Wikipedia? The internet? I'd love to have a 1 on 1 talk with you in person, I'd bet you fall apart and stumble over your words, you've yet to show me anything from you, other than "I hate christainity" have you ever made any attempts to study cells, formations, atoms quantum science? Don't lie and say you have. Like the first thing I said, you've only proven you're capable of Regurgitation
I don't use Wikepedia, I use scientific journals, which have been peer reviewed by hundreds of scientists... And I major in molecular biology, I have been studying cells for the past 3 years, and still continue to study them.. And I would love to have a public debate with you, anytime... We can try and set something up, but I doubt that I will fall apart
Here's some more evidence for you.. If we were "designed" why would the designer (whomever it may be) "design" humans without the gene, L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase that catalyzes the last step of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis.. Humans have 3 of the 4 steps for producing Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) naturally, but the last step was removed.. Why is that? Also why do humans and chimpanzees share so many endogenous retroviruses?
Please, I thought I was done with you, you have no "evidence" you are incapable of forming an opinion of your own you don't go out and actually try to research things yourself you just spit up whatever crap you've heard from someone else. Whenever you are capable of being a thinking being talk to me agian ... otherwise shut up
Comeback when you learn human reasoning, ammoung other things I guess you've never heard of "free thinking" life is meant to be "felt and experienced" not lookin through behind glass...everything you've been saying to me is from "behind a glass" ...you fail as a human
agreed, but the attacks arent necessary bro. to answer the atheists question...if u read sumerian, egyptian myth, or the bible, u would understand that in the book of genesis mankind was made.....twice. first man walked among beast and critters. then, the fallen ones made man in god's likeness(genetic engineering) we are not perfectly evolved but a large step in deed. our own proportions make us superior in terms of sacred geometry. Architecture is something even a materialist should agree on.
I know mankind was made more than once and the Earth has been destroyed more than once, After the flood God tells "Noah to replenisht the Earth" and he also tells adam and Eve to "replenish the Earth" ... obiviously there was something before them that was here ... What I'm saying is .. the more you look into science and creation, and factor in math and the probabilites of chance factors that are needed for complex chemical functions, that are needed for life ... you begin to see ...
see what? that there is no such thing as coincidence, and that our own existence is the most complex computer program ever thought up by no-thing in order to test every possible manifestation of matter in an environment ruled by factors of 3. if so then I agree ;)
Actually everything you have said in this entire page makes no sense at all.
Is that how you operate? Typing nonsense and pseudo-intellectual jibberish hoping to throw off anyone attempting to decipher any sort of semblance of a point from the verbal diarrhea you constantly spew out from that mangled brain of yours.
I'd like to see you articulate an actual rebuttal other than "YOU ARE NOT A REAL HUMAN BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO REASON", OR "I KNOW BEACUSE THE ANCIENT TEXTS HAVE TOLD ME SO".
What you just said was a personal attack because you really can't say anything to disprove or actually go against what I'm saying, see with experience when people do that, that means they simply don't have the courage or are man enough to admit defeat, in your case I'll take it as you don't have anything else.
No, so shut the hell up. I am done with your mindless drivel.
You are so caught up within your own delusions that you fail to understand one of the most basic foundations of mankind: that all of us have differing opinions and beliefs.
It is this very disparity of thought and faith that makes us human beings and not soulless copied automatons.
"You seem like some angry kid, "Oh no I hate God" type person"
You seem like the angry kid saying "Oh no I hate evolution".. I give you evidence and then instead of debunking the evidence, you personally attack me.. And you have yet to give me ONE scientific evidence which contradicts the evolutionary theory
No I just hate people who just simply accept something because it sounds intelligent to them, at the mean time they don't understand what they are seeing and they don't know what they are talking about, science IS NOT pulling information from the Internet and then trying to use it as your own, type of "eureka" moment. I suggest you learn the difference because you still don't
That is a stupid and immature reason to hate a person.. Also why would I type something I had no comphrension of? You really don't make any sense.. How are pseudogenes unscientific, but looking in the mirror is?
I'm telling you, you have 0 experience with "science" Science is, observing, gathering data, testing results, running experiments, not "Oh look, I'm gonna go into goggle now and search the internetz lolz and copy and paste someones research onto a comment box and pretendz I canz understandz itz ROFLCOPPTERZ!!"
I have 0 experience with science when I am a biology major at Tuskegee University, that makes perfect sense.. And don't you think the pseudogene has been observed, sequenced, experimented etc? You have yet to refute any claim I posted, just building up fallacious arguments
If you had experience with "science" as you claim, you wouldn't simply just throw back up someones work, Scientists take pride in their own work, not someone elses, and just sitting back and listening to some Prof, spew information at you isn't science either, swing , and miss again ... Again I'd love to meet you in person and watch you fall apart because you don't have the internet to steal information from other scientists to back up something you don't understand.
Okay, you are an idiot.. Scientists build up on other scientists work, like Albert Einstein did with Newton's gravitational theory..Einstein improved Newton's theory with the theory of relativity to better explain the natural phenomenon we know as gravity.. So what is your views on gravity without using anybody else's work?
When its an established fact and can be tested time and time again with a constant variable ... then Scientist build upon anothers work, they just don't "accept" something as complete truth, do you know how many theories have been proven wrong through testing? After then been accepted for many years, the Earth being the center of the universe was once a scientific fact, until SOMEONE proved otherwise through science, if they were like you per say, the Earth would still be the center.
Do you know what a scientific theory is? I think you are confusing the laymans term of a theory with a scientific theory.. Theories are above facts and laws in science, for theories explains the fact.. Gravity is still a theory.. Geocentrism was a hypothesis, never a theory
Do you? We still don't even understand gravity fully so it will always be a theory, as its beyond our current technology to actually measure the full spectrum of it, facts and laws? We perceive the Universe to our perception and what our currently technology can handle, theres so much thats unable to be measured or examined at the current moment, and until its found out, what are defined as "laws" and "facts" do change.
Modifications within scientific laws are RARE.. Laws are generally universally applicable and 99.9% accurate.. And every theory remains that way, evolution included.. Theories do not turn into facts, but facts turn into theories, for theories explain facts.. And you are still typing a bunch of nonsense and still have yet to discredit anything I said
You are a hypocrite and an idiot, not a good combination.. It's not an opinion that we miss the last step in naturally producing Vitamin C, it is a well known fact that we have a psuedogene which prevents the synthesis of ascorbic acid, I am asking you why do we have this psuedogene if the evolutionary theory is incorrect.. You are basically saying I am incapable of thinking for myself because I accept 2+2=4.. And I sense the irony in your last statement, very humurous
I hope you aren't enough of an idiot to actually apply something like 2 +2 to the formation of the Universe and actually try to make an arguement using that reasoning I HOPE you didn't just attempt something so common.
What are talking about? Do you even know what you are talking about? Honestly. I said nothing about the formation of the universe, are you understanding what I am saying? All jokes aside.. And you have yet to answer ANY of my questions
You just tried to compare 2 + 2=4 logic to formation of the Universe, don't play dumb, if you are even playing seeing as I have yet to perceive any intelligence from you other than what you can copy and paste.
WTF are you talking about.. I said 2+2=4 is a FACT, just like the abscence L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase is a FACT.. You said something about opinions, when this pseudogene isn't an opinion at all, HOW we got the pseudogene is an opinion, and I was asking you for your opinion.. I am agreeing with ltftw, you just spew a bunch of pseudo-intellectual jibberish and think you are a genius
The absennce of your intelligence is a fact as well, please stop acting/playing stupid, you know very well you tried to compare 2 + 2 =4 as if it was a equal parrallel to something like subatomic structure and formation, or the gravtational force needed for a neutron star to form ... seriously, oh and compared to you obiviously I am a genius, and sure theres smarter people than me, but you sure are not one of them.
Prove me wrong then. Copy and paste where I asserted that 2+2=4 is similary to subatomic structures.. I read every single post I entered in this thread, and I apparently cannot find it, so please prove me wrong.. And is it really that hard to answer ONE simple question?
it is true what they say men speak many words to manipulate and deceive but the truth is simple and the mind that finds the truth will not be what we think of as a genius so u people can read as many books and theorys as u want but what u lack is a mind of your own i dont need anyone to tell me what i believe is true my own experiences shape my existence
Evolution is just a Theory, so poeple who say it is true make a little mistake! Cause it never can be proofen that Evolution is real(instead the theory has many mistakes in it), so they should say they believe it is true like other poeple say they believe that creation is true.
theory of evolution has been proven and observed. the theory of evolution attempts to describe the observed process of evolution. don't talk about stuff you don't know anything about.
Proven? then why it´s still called theory xD If it would have been proven now i think it would hit every headline on the planet! An this didn´t happen.
And if it would not be so difficult for me to explain things in english (i´m german) i would tell you a few mistakes and still unsolved problems of the evolution theory. For exaple the first living how does it develop from dead chemicals? Even Darwin knew about this, and decided to ignore it, because it never can be found out.
es ist eine wissenschaftliche theorie. wissenschaftliche theorien beschreiben beobachtete phänomene und versuchen sie zu erklären. evolution selbst ist beobachtet, die evolutionstheorie beschreibt, was geschieht. warum muss man das JEDEM kreationisten aufs neue erklären und meistens kapiern sies selbst dann nicht?
erstes leben: ist noch nicht sicher, gibt verschiedene ansätze. wird aber nicht ignoriert. ist ausserdem nicht evolution, sondern abiogenese. lies was über chemische evolution.
Common straw man argument by creationists.. You should learn what a scientific theory is before posting asinine comments. A theory in science is different from the layman term, which is a postulation.. Theories in science are built upon facts, gravity is still a theory, as well as atoms.. Theories don't turn into facts, facts and laws turn into theories.. And evolution has mountains of evidence, I bet you don't have any to discredit the evolutionary theory
You keep talking about mountains of evidence but you come with nothing, all the evidence you probably have are based on chance happenings with ratios larger than 10 to the 100000 power, a number too big to be considered reasonable -_-
Do you even know what you are talking about? Evolution is nothing but mutation and natural selection, both which have been observed.. So I don't see why you keep bringing up minuscule chances of evolution occurring.. As for evidence, there is DNA, mtDNA, ERV's, fossils, atavisms, genes in which we can find that underwent natural selection, fused chromosome 2 etc.. There are tons of evidence for evolution, the matter lies whether you accept the evidence or not, but to say there is none is asinine
Mutation and natural selection ... rely on ... guess what? Chance, a chance THAT something had to OCCUR to force it to happen, atoms just don't go, hmmm maybe I should or should not have electrons and neutrons, I'm telling you to stop and think what would happen if the simple structure that some silly man has laid out, even now decided to randomly build something without any blueprints or some formation to it? What would he accomplish?
I could tell you some things that show the ignored problems of evolution but as you may have recognized yet, my english sucks because I´m german. And if i would try to explain you such difficult things in english it would take me very long to write them down and in the end you probably won´t what is was trying to say. And that´s why I can´t do it. I guess you think this is a stupid excuse but no its not i don´t even know half of the words i need to ma a good explanation...
Funny how all "atheist" people simply falter and stick to evolution, because its the opposite of some kind of IE never mind looking at the science and logic of it, lets take a everyday common look around us at society ... cars, roadways, highways, ... everything is structured, not one brick on a building randomly put it self there, nor did any Car at a factory randomly and haplessly rely on a random factor in order to work, theres a difference between knowldege and wisdom, I suggest you find it
Atheism and evolution are not synonymous, which is another fallacy amongst creationist. Also your straw man's don't impress me neither, and are rather weak. Just google "Watchmaker argument debunked" and you will see why your rebuttals are futile. You cannot compare inanimate objects unable to propagate to animate being which can. A car lacks the ability to undergo random mutation and natural selection, therefore is not subjected to evolution.. Seems like you lack both knowledge and wisdom
Yes, they are actually as you keep proving? You seem like some angry kid, "Oh no I hate God" type person, and you only have 1 concept of over a thousand different religions, I shouldn't have to google anything if you actually believe what you are saying then you should have studied and gained enough knowledge on your own, instead of buying into anothers beliefs (which in fact if you do, are not yours to begin with) And you can compare inanimate objects to animates ones.
If something of such simple structure, with chemical bonds was, (big suprise) had its design forced by something, then probably by common sense would suggest something of much more complex design would move up in design, not degrade down to randomness of hopless chance, like you seem to like to believe, because of your "Oh no I hate anything that might imply some sort of design" logic.
I can't hate something that doesn't exist, and there are plenty of theists who accept evolution, so I don't know why you keep bringing up God.. And doesn't me knowing the watchmaker argument know that I have studied the subject? You really aren't making much sense.. And how can you compare inanimate objects to animate ones?
Your profile, and favorites and videos all stick to 1 elementary logic of, "I hate religion" "I don't like christainity" its so funny, do you have any concepts of History? You can't even correctly attack the proper religion/belief, here I'll start you off on your hopless path to ignorance, start with the Zodiac symbols, then maybe toward Egyptology, but all this might be too much for you to handle! As your logic seems to be in the 10-14 year old range.
To evolve such as a human embryo evolving to a baby evolving to a child evolving to a boy or a girl evolving to a teenager evolving to a man or a woman this is one of INFINITY examples of an EVOLUTION SIMPLE not a THEORY. ENDLESS TIME or INFINITY IS EVOLUTION AT ITS BEST!!!XXXHA
a human is a human no matter what age he has. Evolution tells that the different races are all coming from one single first cell wich has millions of million perfect mutations for NO REASON. If you believe this ok, but pleace don´t say it has been proven, cause it never can be proven. I think it´s not true you think it is, well, so be it....
Obviously, Evolution is the process of creation. Back up and view 'individual' units of 'life' from the point of view of the field from which they emerged. Flower, bee, tree, earth, wind, heat, cold, Void.
Anybody know the sample for this INCREDIBLE beat?
TheBlackMoose 3 months ago
never heard these guys before but one of them sounds a lot like blade. this is good stuff.
markclown1 6 months ago
Comment removed
waggabiggadoo 6 months ago
so basically there are jews and muhamedist, atheists and others who worship flesh. and bhuddists and christians and hindus and muslims who worship spirit so when you say mutation are you talking about blacks turning white when they move to europe or some dumb crap like that
MrStupidJoo 8 months ago
@MrStupidJoo What are you talking about?
a7xkobebryant 8 months ago
Comment removed
waggabiggadoo 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
atma beyond the speed of mind, masta buildas reptilian body snatchas on sale on itunes now !!
atma beyond birth and death, masta buildas atma & apakalypse on sale now on itunes !! Support real hiphop !!
1love
OMTATSAAT 9 months ago
LCOB IZ THE BEST!!! FROM A HIP HOP HEAD SINCE 1984...
elektroindi 10 months ago
Worst. Vid. Ever. So thumbs down for the crappiest song
MakutaTelluris1 1 year ago
damn reptilians
OwlDeV1l 1 year ago
dominant? Ha.
WarriorOfTheBlackSun 1 year ago
The people who thumbed this down are affiliated with the illuminati.
ac1dchr15t 1 year ago
thank you for that explanation infite7(creation)
dangel6667 1 year ago
what the hell is this song about??
dangel6667 1 year ago
@dangel6667 LOL GO READ SOME BOOKS;
infinite7 1 year ago
@dangel6667
this song is aout the missing link in the human evolution
TheWarClouddV2 1 year ago
Rap $ucks
Markb25266 1 year ago
@Markb25266 GO LISTEN TO ROCK LMAO
infinite7 1 year ago
@Markb25266 Nah THIS rap sucks
Flashlax19 1 year ago
@Flashlax19 you suck
lukehigh1991 1 year ago
wow
captnwaite 1 year ago
that xmen sample is ILL
BORNFORWU 1 year ago
fucking stupid and pointless shit talking
scheming8rythem 1 year ago
A bit like you hey?
elektroindi 1 year ago
@elektroindi like me and you
scheming8rythem 1 year ago
No like you only.
elektroindi 1 year ago
I liked it, until they started rapping
666Pestilince666 1 year ago
Fuck off then
elektroindi 1 year ago
..................X-men?
Snowbizdragon 2 years ago
can anyone write down the lyrics pls?....thnx
stevenwise100 2 years ago
Why does this song only have 4 stars? This easily deserves 5 stars, fucking cretinist (creationist).. I already know those IDiots had something to do tainting the ratings.
Evolution is a FACT, get over it creationist. Also this song OWNS, even though I don't believe the "missing link" is a spiritual entity, good song nonetheless, LCOB always bring that good shit, lyrical super giants. Wish they would collaborate with Canibus, that would be epic
JLuvs0fficial 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol Lost Shilldren of Babylon/Egypt is wack pro black mystery school bs. their lyrics filled with Nuwaubian teachings of Dr. Malachi Z. York. Same bs all mystery schools teach the only diff is this is black supremacist movement.
titofan99 2 years ago
wow you actually spent your time posting this comment on multiple songs... what compells a thoughtless creature such as you
Jordyjg 2 years ago
so this is popular? Playing music to a picture of a book??!!!!
kwarrior101 2 years ago
That's the cover of their album.
rawkuslegend 2 years ago
by far the most inteligent music ever made
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
immortal technique he has some good music
devilwizaru 1 year ago
yes, yes it is, fuckin hilarious
tolleydread 2 years ago
was the beginning voice Patrick Stewart
highofflifeforever 2 years ago
love the ending
westwatford 2 years ago
this is grieks god minyotafrus loool
sfinkxxxx 2 years ago
ESTOS WNES SON REPTILIANOS!!
d1egone 2 years ago
the second verse sound like an inteligent cam'ron
peACeGOd123 2 years ago
Damn you all for making me waste a whole day one 1 song, damn this was really difficult to you! I did the lyrics for Missing link ...
Jahan917 2 years ago 10
One picture is not a good video.
gregrutz 2 years ago
I'm working on my own video with Lyrics as I type this ...
Jahan917 2 years ago 5
It's going to be so hard doing the lyrics for this ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
This song should have been in "where light was created" seems out of place in this album ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
Intro-Quantum State
Check it now
solid track
QuantumStateMusic 2 years ago
I dont know when everybody is going to understand. NOBODY will KNOW anything about anything. We only gather and relay the information but we will neve know whats true but we do know what is a lie. And the lie is religion and what the media presents the world to be with money and physical existence.
traingunner 2 years ago
why dont you 2 fucks stop arguin whos smarter over a baddass youtube video you both dont have shit to prove to eachother, if you know your smart then thats it... POST THE FUCKING KLYRICS
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
You actually make a good point!
Jahan917 2 years ago
I mean I'm discussing something with someone over what they have been told by someone else, maybe I should just google his/her words and find the person actually responsible for doing the work. Oh my now that's acting just like Coolatheist
Jahan917 2 years ago
"You are basically saying I am incapable of thinking for myself because I accept 2+2=4.. And I sense the irony in your last statement, very humurous"
Inductive Arguement, you're implying that what you're saying is completely precise, to the point, were you not to accept your arguement, you would have the inability to perceive the outcome of 2 + 2. As if there is no other option other than what you have displayed
Jahan917 2 years ago
Comment removed
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
Now where did I say anything about the universe formation? And the abscence of L-guluno gamma lactone oxidate is completely precise, and there are no other alternatives.. What don't you get about this? It is a FACT that we have this pseudogene, just like 2+2=4 is a FACT.. What is so hard to understand about that?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Ok, You just repeated the same arguementative fallacy, just reworded... How thick are you?
Jahan917 2 years ago
Why isn't the pseudogene a fact?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Why do you behave as a automaton?
Jahan917 2 years ago
Comment removed
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
It's AN automaton, not a automaton... And is automaton your word for the day? That's cute.. I just love the fact you have yet to answer one of my questions? If you cannot answer my questions, I totally understand, you aren't the brightest crayon in the box
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
No AN is past tense, and of course you have yet to learn anything from this entire conversation, I'm not the brightest crayon in the box, but I will always be that color brighter than you.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Wow you are dumber then I thought, and that is saying a lot.. "An" goes before any word which commences with a vowel (a, e, i, o, u), with exceptions (automaton NOT being one of those exceptions).. That is third grade grammar.. Or is that not a fact neither, hahaha.. No wonder you don't understand pseudogenes, you can't even grasp third grade grammar.. Sorry for bothering you, I didn't mean to hurt the three brain cells in that thick skull of yours, I apologize
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Don't try derail and divert, English grammar is only a fact if you believe the English language is the oldest in the world seeing as you believe Christainity to be the main focal of your "problems" I wouldn't blame you. Here's a small hint ... It was only made up by a man, from another language now that MAY be to hard for you to understand, seeing as you can't think just recite what you've been told, know the difference.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Nice red herring fallacy you incorporated.. It doesn't matter if the English language was first or last, "an" still goes before a word which starts with a vowel.. And how is English grammar a fact if someone believes it is the oldest language.. Other languages that came before English has the same principles... All language is made up by man, wtf are you talking about? Languages evolve, just as species do
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Wrong again, see if you actually looked at different languages you'd know that's not always the case I'm part Chinese and I've studied Japanese Hiragana and romanji, it's the complete opposite of the English language, verbs are stated first, then nouns and pronouns, Also languages do not improve over time any idiot who's studied history knows how advanced the Hebrew Torah was where every letter and word was also a number, try again.0
Jahan917 2 years ago
Did I say every single language have the same principles? No, I said "other".. Also evolution=/=improving.. I never said language has improved, I said they evolved. They are not synonymous, so how about you try again
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Fail attempt to make up for your lack information, I love how sly and subtle you try to act by finding the smallest loophole in what you say and try to apply it. You knew you meant all other languages when you said that, all languages don't follow the same principles and some do not "evolve" they remain at a point where they are so complex they can't really change, the basic form of "language" will always be emotions, and body expressions
Jahan917 2 years ago
"Falied" attempt, not fail.. Oh, the English language came last so the English grammar doesn't exist.. Haha.. And if you don't know the difference between others and all, then I feel sorry for you, really I do..If I meant "all other", I would have said that.. And all languages evolve, not whatever religious reason you want to believe, whether it is the tower of babylon, or whatever you want to believe in.. How do you think language originated?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
How retarded are you? Just because I think there was some creation involved does NOT repeat NOT make you religious, I'm against religions you moron, I'm not some college brainwashed puppet with someone elses thinking pattern, The simple fact is you never knew what "you" mean or will ever know. I'm pretty sure language started firsty as pictures carved, you may only be aetheist because you think it's cool or something most likely I'm 100 percent sure someone talked or influenced you into it.
Jahan917 2 years ago
" many creation stories say that the earth was at one time flooded, scientific proof proves that at a time the earth was completely covered in water"
"I know mankind was made more than once and the Earth has been destroyed more than once, After the flood God tells "Noah to replenisht the Earth" and he also tells adam and Eve to "replenish the Earth"
So you believe in creation, Adam and Eve, and a great flood, but are not religious? You are the retard
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
I was obiviously using examples, usually If a lot of different cultures all agree or tell the same thing that usually means there's something to it. Here's an idea how about you stop letting your Professor pump your head full of shit he doesn't understand to another idiot who doesn't understand but just accepts it? I said I believed in a creation religion and creation do not have to be linked. Going by what I've been saying about you it appears I've been hitting the nail on the head everytime
Jahan917 2 years ago
You are right, the English language does evolve. And still is.
Bristow42 2 years ago
The English language doesn't evolve, its just the by product of another, with new words being added in? I wouldn't say thats evolution
Jahan917 2 years ago
Don eow geteohhian swa, me lefre waere geteohhian hit has sumfea. Ooer fierst do eower ham gedeorf. Old english you translate.
Bristow42 2 years ago 2
It's not old english, its your attempt to look like an idiot, which you succeeded in doing.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Jahan917 reply is a product of an unruly childhood with no parental supervision. We have all seen it before pretty princess syndrome. Your turn emo.
Bristow42 2 years ago 2
ahahahaha
jacobward44 2 years ago
Thanks for the compliment, but how does that have anything to do with that retarded statement about the English language, I'm here to discuss not have a rock throwing contest with an elementary school drop-out.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Comment removed
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Everything that humans can imagine is a possibility in reality
Willy Karen
freejackpk23 2 years ago
If everything in existance relied on some chance happening of "infinite possibilites", the chances for there being "infinite failures" of nothing are much more likely and would repeat an infinite ammount of times, to the point where nothing would progress because it would always collapse on itself. The possibility of causing self destruction would override anything, as 1 simple chemical failure would cause nothing to exist, I-don't-think-you-people-have-a-grasp-on-just-how-delicate this is.
Jahan917 2 years ago
LOST CHILDREN are good but BEAST is SUPERIOR
YOUTUBE KEYWORD: ILLUMINATI BEAST
Lizzygreenblatt 2 years ago
damn man nobody posted the lyrics to this fuckin tune yet
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
whoever actually posts the lyrics is a straight badass
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
This is the hardest one to do, he says so much so fast ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
Comment removed
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
hip hop can save the world, join the information war.
Idolcruisefix 2 years ago
@
C00lblkatheist
...to make a good explanation about why evolution theorie can´t be true. If you understand complex german i would like to talk with you about it:)
Lakanomanunda 2 years ago
someone should post the lyrics i cant really hear what he says
H311ZAN63l666 2 years ago
This song is so Cold,That Beat is mid 90z Hip hop all day.
MultiverseCinema 2 years ago
Sadly, the more knowledge you gain and the more you understand ... you realize that evolution is impossible, the Universe is incredibly complex beyond human understanding, just as a building is built upon bricks and is structured and layered so is the universe ... theres no way this all just happened at a chance ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
Evolution is not impossible, and the teleological argument has been debunked a plethora of times.. Also you should look up the fallacy "argumentum ad ignorantiam" which states basically what you asserted.. Evolution is a fact, and has mountains of evidence to back it up
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Giving the mathematics and ratios of chance and miracle happenings for evolution to take place ... I would say it would be impossible without some driving force directing it to be the way it is. Again I say Science disproves pure evolution, math disproves pure evolution, evolution is not a fact, but just a more of a myth of people believing the earth was square and the center of the universe
Jahan917 2 years ago
Here's some evidence in which I would love for you to debunk
ncbi(DOT)nlm(DOT)nih(DOT)gov/pubmed/17090677?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2(DOT)PEntrez(DOT)Pubmed(DOT)Pubmed_ResultsPanel(DOT)Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel(DOT)Pubmed_RVDocSum
ncbi(DOT)nlm(DOT)nih(DOT)gov/pubmed/19166919?ordinalpos=8&itool=EntrezSystem2(DOT)PEntrez.Pubmed(DOT)Pubmed_ResultsPanel(DOT)Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel(DOT)Pubmed_RVDocSum
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Remember what I said about having knowledge and actual wisdom? You seem to have 0 knowledge and 0 wisdom since its all regurtitated crap from other people, which don't really have a concept of the Universe, its more mathimatical, again I'm going to say science easily disproves pure evolution.
Jahan917 2 years ago
ncbi(DOT)nlm(DOT)nih(DOT)gov/pubmed/18789136?ordinalpos=13&itool=EntrezSystem2(DOT)PEntrez(DOT)Pubmed(DOT)Pubmed_ResultsPanel(DOT)Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel(DOT)Pubmed_RVDocSum
ncbi(DOT)nlm(DOT)nih(DOT)gov/pubmed/19378404?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2(DOY)PEntrez(DOT)Pubmed(DOT)Pubmed_ResultsPanel(DOT)Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel(DOT)Pubmed_RVDocSum
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Oh look, you know how to eat someones else's food and throw it back up.
Jahan917 2 years ago
"Oh look, you know how to eat someones else's food and throw it back up"
Translation, "I have no clue what they are talking about and can't disprove any of it"
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
The only one who has no clue what they are talking about is you, you really can't understand what you're reading if you're only looking at one view point of the infomation you weren't even inspired enough by to try to actually research on your own, I've been in astronomy over 13 years, I've been in geology over 4 years, I've actually studied things other than simply eat whats ever fed to me, even though I don't even understand the persons research nor ever will.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Microcephalin is a gene in which regulates brain size, mostly responsible for the neocortex (which means new covering in Latin.).. Microcephalin underwent positive selection. And they found this out by comparing genetic sequences of ethnically and geographically diverse people and found polymorphisms (sequence difference). They analyzed the polymorohism and calculated a genetic variant of microcephalin which arose 37,000 years ago, which happens to coincide with the emergence of culturally
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
(cont).. modern humans .. So if humans were created in one day with full brains, why does this gene say otherwise? And there are other genes that prove this as well.. CDK2RAP5, CENJ5, ASPM, Sonic Hedgehod, fox1, fox2 genes etc
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Created in one day? Still sticking to your christainity beliefs huh? Theres hundreds of creation stories, that are actually more well put together than the Bible ... and even if you accept the Bible I remember it being that the "day" was 1000 years to the Hebrew God. Scientists don't like admitting we don't really know, so we have the pure evolution myth, hence everything, EVERYTHING bends toward a formed structure. I've never found a Star or cluster formation randomly move itself
Jahan917 2 years ago
Like the Yanomamo Sanema creation story, where they believe we "evolved" from a spirit from a forest? Or Lord Brahma and how he grows lonely and splits into male and female, and the beliefs of reincarnation? Muslims creation story is similar to Christianity, which they believed to take place 5770 BCE.. Or the P'an Ku creation story.. Also the "day" meaning a thousand years has been discredited by many theistic scholars
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
None of them hold weight, and most of them say "man" was created in a single day, 24 hour day, not a thousand year day.... So what do you believe in?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
I don't believe in any of them as they aren't scientific enough to believe in, theres more theories about creation than just the simple "magical being putting us here"
Jahan917 2 years ago
Its only a story, the point is generally to find similarties between them all which might point to actually scientific evidence, many creation stories say that the earth was at one time flooded, scientific proof proves that at a time the earth was completely covered in water
Jahan917 2 years ago
And you have yet to give me some evidence which disproves evolution
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
All you have to do is look in the mirror and the world around you and examine it.
Jahan917 2 years ago
I have been researching and reading scientific journals, after scientific journals the past couple of weeks, and in not one of them said "looking in the mirror" is evidence against evolution.. how is that even falsifiable.. Your statement was 100% unscientific.. Now can you please give me evidence that evolution is false.. I gave you evidence with the ASPM, microcephalin, CENJ2, CDK5RAP2 genes, which we know underwent positive selection. So give me some scientific evidence why evolution is false
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
You can use Wikipedia? The internet? I'd love to have a 1 on 1 talk with you in person, I'd bet you fall apart and stumble over your words, you've yet to show me anything from you, other than "I hate christainity" have you ever made any attempts to study cells, formations, atoms quantum science? Don't lie and say you have. Like the first thing I said, you've only proven you're capable of Regurgitation
Jahan917 2 years ago
I don't use Wikepedia, I use scientific journals, which have been peer reviewed by hundreds of scientists... And I major in molecular biology, I have been studying cells for the past 3 years, and still continue to study them.. And I would love to have a public debate with you, anytime... We can try and set something up, but I doubt that I will fall apart
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Here's some more evidence for you.. If we were "designed" why would the designer (whomever it may be) "design" humans without the gene, L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase that catalyzes the last step of L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis.. Humans have 3 of the 4 steps for producing Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) naturally, but the last step was removed.. Why is that? Also why do humans and chimpanzees share so many endogenous retroviruses?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Please, I thought I was done with you, you have no "evidence" you are incapable of forming an opinion of your own you don't go out and actually try to research things yourself you just spit up whatever crap you've heard from someone else. Whenever you are capable of being a thinking being talk to me agian ... otherwise shut up
Jahan917 2 years ago
Typical responce to something you can't answer. You avoid the question and instead attack the person asking it.
Come back when you learn to discourse.
ltftw 2 years ago
Comeback when you learn human reasoning, ammoung other things I guess you've never heard of "free thinking" life is meant to be "felt and experienced" not lookin through behind glass...everything you've been saying to me is from "behind a glass" ...you fail as a human
Jahan917 2 years ago
agreed, but the attacks arent necessary bro. to answer the atheists question...if u read sumerian, egyptian myth, or the bible, u would understand that in the book of genesis mankind was made.....twice. first man walked among beast and critters. then, the fallen ones made man in god's likeness(genetic engineering) we are not perfectly evolved but a large step in deed. our own proportions make us superior in terms of sacred geometry. Architecture is something even a materialist should agree on.
RKSeams 2 years ago
I know mankind was made more than once and the Earth has been destroyed more than once, After the flood God tells "Noah to replenisht the Earth" and he also tells adam and Eve to "replenish the Earth" ... obiviously there was something before them that was here ... What I'm saying is .. the more you look into science and creation, and factor in math and the probabilites of chance factors that are needed for complex chemical functions, that are needed for life ... you begin to see ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
see what? that there is no such thing as coincidence, and that our own existence is the most complex computer program ever thought up by no-thing in order to test every possible manifestation of matter in an environment ruled by factors of 3. if so then I agree ;)
RKSeams 2 years ago
A computer program relies on numbers and order, and thought requires a "being" what you just said made no sense.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Actually everything you have said in this entire page makes no sense at all.
Is that how you operate? Typing nonsense and pseudo-intellectual jibberish hoping to throw off anyone attempting to decipher any sort of semblance of a point from the verbal diarrhea you constantly spew out from that mangled brain of yours.
I'd like to see you articulate an actual rebuttal other than "YOU ARE NOT A REAL HUMAN BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO REASON", OR "I KNOW BEACUSE THE ANCIENT TEXTS HAVE TOLD ME SO".
ltftw 2 years ago
What you just said was a personal attack because you really can't say anything to disprove or actually go against what I'm saying, see with experience when people do that, that means they simply don't have the courage or are man enough to admit defeat, in your case I'll take it as you don't have anything else.
Jahan917 2 years ago
YOU STILL FAIL AS A HUMAN
Jahan917 2 years ago
And who are you to judge?
Are you so above all the rest of us?
Can an imperfect being judge another?
No, so shut the hell up. I am done with your mindless drivel.
You are so caught up within your own delusions that you fail to understand one of the most basic foundations of mankind: that all of us have differing opinions and beliefs.
It is this very disparity of thought and faith that makes us human beings and not soulless copied automatons.
Good day to you sir, I am done here.
ltftw 2 years ago 8
1.How about you stick to the topic at hand and add some intelligent output?
2.
It seems I am more perfect than you, so it would seem so.
3.Yes
Instead of ranting and raving like a teenager how about you add something to the topic? Next please ...
Jahan917 2 years ago
@ltftw we are soulless you aragant piece of shit. who are you to think you know anything.... shut up your mouth
lukehigh1991 1 year ago
@lukehigh1991
>aragant
>lukeHIGH
>1991
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you - the missing link.
ltftw 1 year ago
"You seem like some angry kid, "Oh no I hate God" type person"
You seem like the angry kid saying "Oh no I hate evolution".. I give you evidence and then instead of debunking the evidence, you personally attack me.. And you have yet to give me ONE scientific evidence which contradicts the evolutionary theory
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
No I just hate people who just simply accept something because it sounds intelligent to them, at the mean time they don't understand what they are seeing and they don't know what they are talking about, science IS NOT pulling information from the Internet and then trying to use it as your own, type of "eureka" moment. I suggest you learn the difference because you still don't
Jahan917 2 years ago
That is a stupid and immature reason to hate a person.. Also why would I type something I had no comphrension of? You really don't make any sense.. How are pseudogenes unscientific, but looking in the mirror is?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
I'm telling you, you have 0 experience with "science" Science is, observing, gathering data, testing results, running experiments, not "Oh look, I'm gonna go into goggle now and search the internetz lolz and copy and paste someones research onto a comment box and pretendz I canz understandz itz ROFLCOPPTERZ!!"
Jahan917 2 years ago
I have 0 experience with science when I am a biology major at Tuskegee University, that makes perfect sense.. And don't you think the pseudogene has been observed, sequenced, experimented etc? You have yet to refute any claim I posted, just building up fallacious arguments
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
If you had experience with "science" as you claim, you wouldn't simply just throw back up someones work, Scientists take pride in their own work, not someone elses, and just sitting back and listening to some Prof, spew information at you isn't science either, swing , and miss again ... Again I'd love to meet you in person and watch you fall apart because you don't have the internet to steal information from other scientists to back up something you don't understand.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Okay, you are an idiot.. Scientists build up on other scientists work, like Albert Einstein did with Newton's gravitational theory..Einstein improved Newton's theory with the theory of relativity to better explain the natural phenomenon we know as gravity.. So what is your views on gravity without using anybody else's work?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
When its an established fact and can be tested time and time again with a constant variable ... then Scientist build upon anothers work, they just don't "accept" something as complete truth, do you know how many theories have been proven wrong through testing? After then been accepted for many years, the Earth being the center of the universe was once a scientific fact, until SOMEONE proved otherwise through science, if they were like you per say, the Earth would still be the center.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Do you know what a scientific theory is? I think you are confusing the laymans term of a theory with a scientific theory.. Theories are above facts and laws in science, for theories explains the fact.. Gravity is still a theory.. Geocentrism was a hypothesis, never a theory
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Do you? We still don't even understand gravity fully so it will always be a theory, as its beyond our current technology to actually measure the full spectrum of it, facts and laws? We perceive the Universe to our perception and what our currently technology can handle, theres so much thats unable to be measured or examined at the current moment, and until its found out, what are defined as "laws" and "facts" do change.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Modifications within scientific laws are RARE.. Laws are generally universally applicable and 99.9% accurate.. And every theory remains that way, evolution included.. Theories do not turn into facts, but facts turn into theories, for theories explain facts.. And you are still typing a bunch of nonsense and still have yet to discredit anything I said
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
You are a hypocrite and an idiot, not a good combination.. It's not an opinion that we miss the last step in naturally producing Vitamin C, it is a well known fact that we have a psuedogene which prevents the synthesis of ascorbic acid, I am asking you why do we have this psuedogene if the evolutionary theory is incorrect.. You are basically saying I am incapable of thinking for myself because I accept 2+2=4.. And I sense the irony in your last statement, very humurous
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
I hope you aren't enough of an idiot to actually apply something like 2 +2 to the formation of the Universe and actually try to make an arguement using that reasoning I HOPE you didn't just attempt something so common.
Jahan917 2 years ago
What are talking about? Do you even know what you are talking about? Honestly. I said nothing about the formation of the universe, are you understanding what I am saying? All jokes aside.. And you have yet to answer ANY of my questions
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
You just tried to compare 2 + 2=4 logic to formation of the Universe, don't play dumb, if you are even playing seeing as I have yet to perceive any intelligence from you other than what you can copy and paste.
Jahan917 2 years ago
WTF are you talking about.. I said 2+2=4 is a FACT, just like the abscence L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase is a FACT.. You said something about opinions, when this pseudogene isn't an opinion at all, HOW we got the pseudogene is an opinion, and I was asking you for your opinion.. I am agreeing with ltftw, you just spew a bunch of pseudo-intellectual jibberish and think you are a genius
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
The absennce of your intelligence is a fact as well, please stop acting/playing stupid, you know very well you tried to compare 2 + 2 =4 as if it was a equal parrallel to something like subatomic structure and formation, or the gravtational force needed for a neutron star to form ... seriously, oh and compared to you obiviously I am a genius, and sure theres smarter people than me, but you sure are not one of them.
Jahan917 2 years ago
Prove me wrong then. Copy and paste where I asserted that 2+2=4 is similary to subatomic structures.. I read every single post I entered in this thread, and I apparently cannot find it, so please prove me wrong.. And is it really that hard to answer ONE simple question?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
it is true what they say men speak many words to manipulate and deceive but the truth is simple and the mind that finds the truth will not be what we think of as a genius so u people can read as many books and theorys as u want but what u lack is a mind of your own i dont need anyone to tell me what i believe is true my own experiences shape my existence
Stillmatic2008 2 years ago
Evolution is just a Theory, so poeple who say it is true make a little mistake! Cause it never can be proofen that Evolution is real(instead the theory has many mistakes in it), so they should say they believe it is true like other poeple say they believe that creation is true.
Lakanomanunda 3 years ago
You are obviously very ignorant in the subject of evolution in biology.
strongfp 3 years ago
theory of evolution has been proven and observed. the theory of evolution attempts to describe the observed process of evolution. don't talk about stuff you don't know anything about.
chaomonga 3 years ago
Proven? then why it´s still called theory xD If it would have been proven now i think it would hit every headline on the planet! An this didn´t happen.
And if it would not be so difficult for me to explain things in english (i´m german) i would tell you a few mistakes and still unsolved problems of the evolution theory. For exaple the first living how does it develop from dead chemicals? Even Darwin knew about this, and decided to ignore it, because it never can be found out.
Lakanomanunda 2 years ago
es ist eine wissenschaftliche theorie. wissenschaftliche theorien beschreiben beobachtete phänomene und versuchen sie zu erklären. evolution selbst ist beobachtet, die evolutionstheorie beschreibt, was geschieht. warum muss man das JEDEM kreationisten aufs neue erklären und meistens kapiern sies selbst dann nicht?
erstes leben: ist noch nicht sicher, gibt verschiedene ansätze. wird aber nicht ignoriert. ist ausserdem nicht evolution, sondern abiogenese. lies was über chemische evolution.
chaomonga 2 years ago
Common straw man argument by creationists.. You should learn what a scientific theory is before posting asinine comments. A theory in science is different from the layman term, which is a postulation.. Theories in science are built upon facts, gravity is still a theory, as well as atoms.. Theories don't turn into facts, facts and laws turn into theories.. And evolution has mountains of evidence, I bet you don't have any to discredit the evolutionary theory
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
You keep talking about mountains of evidence but you come with nothing, all the evidence you probably have are based on chance happenings with ratios larger than 10 to the 100000 power, a number too big to be considered reasonable -_-
Jahan917 2 years ago
Do you even know what you are talking about? Evolution is nothing but mutation and natural selection, both which have been observed.. So I don't see why you keep bringing up minuscule chances of evolution occurring.. As for evidence, there is DNA, mtDNA, ERV's, fossils, atavisms, genes in which we can find that underwent natural selection, fused chromosome 2 etc.. There are tons of evidence for evolution, the matter lies whether you accept the evidence or not, but to say there is none is asinine
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Mutation and natural selection ... rely on ... guess what? Chance, a chance THAT something had to OCCUR to force it to happen, atoms just don't go, hmmm maybe I should or should not have electrons and neutrons, I'm telling you to stop and think what would happen if the simple structure that some silly man has laid out, even now decided to randomly build something without any blueprints or some formation to it? What would he accomplish?
Jahan917 2 years ago
I could tell you some things that show the ignored problems of evolution but as you may have recognized yet, my english sucks because I´m german. And if i would try to explain you such difficult things in english it would take me very long to write them down and in the end you probably won´t what is was trying to say. And that´s why I can´t do it. I guess you think this is a stupid excuse but no its not i don´t even know half of the words i need to ma a good explanation...
Lakanomanunda 2 years ago
Funny how all "atheist" people simply falter and stick to evolution, because its the opposite of some kind of IE never mind looking at the science and logic of it, lets take a everyday common look around us at society ... cars, roadways, highways, ... everything is structured, not one brick on a building randomly put it self there, nor did any Car at a factory randomly and haplessly rely on a random factor in order to work, theres a difference between knowldege and wisdom, I suggest you find it
Jahan917 2 years ago
Atheism and evolution are not synonymous, which is another fallacy amongst creationist. Also your straw man's don't impress me neither, and are rather weak. Just google "Watchmaker argument debunked" and you will see why your rebuttals are futile. You cannot compare inanimate objects unable to propagate to animate being which can. A car lacks the ability to undergo random mutation and natural selection, therefore is not subjected to evolution.. Seems like you lack both knowledge and wisdom
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Yes, they are actually as you keep proving? You seem like some angry kid, "Oh no I hate God" type person, and you only have 1 concept of over a thousand different religions, I shouldn't have to google anything if you actually believe what you are saying then you should have studied and gained enough knowledge on your own, instead of buying into anothers beliefs (which in fact if you do, are not yours to begin with) And you can compare inanimate objects to animates ones.
Jahan917 2 years ago
If something of such simple structure, with chemical bonds was, (big suprise) had its design forced by something, then probably by common sense would suggest something of much more complex design would move up in design, not degrade down to randomness of hopless chance, like you seem to like to believe, because of your "Oh no I hate anything that might imply some sort of design" logic.
Jahan917 2 years ago
I can't hate something that doesn't exist, and there are plenty of theists who accept evolution, so I don't know why you keep bringing up God.. And doesn't me knowing the watchmaker argument know that I have studied the subject? You really aren't making much sense.. And how can you compare inanimate objects to animate ones?
C00lblkatheist 2 years ago
Your profile, and favorites and videos all stick to 1 elementary logic of, "I hate religion" "I don't like christainity" its so funny, do you have any concepts of History? You can't even correctly attack the proper religion/belief, here I'll start you off on your hopless path to ignorance, start with the Zodiac symbols, then maybe toward Egyptology, but all this might be too much for you to handle! As your logic seems to be in the 10-14 year old range.
Jahan917 2 years ago
TRRRROOOOOLLLL!!!
crazybassplayerdude 2 years ago
To evolve such as a human embryo evolving to a baby evolving to a child evolving to a boy or a girl evolving to a teenager evolving to a man or a woman this is one of INFINITY examples of an EVOLUTION SIMPLE not a THEORY. ENDLESS TIME or INFINITY IS EVOLUTION AT ITS BEST!!!XXXHA
hailabg 2 years ago
a human is a human no matter what age he has. Evolution tells that the different races are all coming from one single first cell wich has millions of million perfect mutations for NO REASON. If you believe this ok, but pleace don´t say it has been proven, cause it never can be proven. I think it´s not true you think it is, well, so be it....
Lakanomanunda 2 years ago 2
Obviously, Evolution is the process of creation. Back up and view 'individual' units of 'life' from the point of view of the field from which they emerged. Flower, bee, tree, earth, wind, heat, cold, Void.
bqreus 2 years ago
Music was the missing link?
rossimcrossi 3 years ago
raahubaat,now this is music...wooooo these sena's cold
MultiverseCinema 3 years ago
Hasalamalakum to the Nuwabus!
OrionCannon 3 years ago