Answer to everything is number ONE. Or just ONE, to be precise.
If you have 2 or more, then it is contained in 1...something. So, everything is one, and the rest is just 0.00000000...... of one. It's not a dividation or something splitted, it's just something that exist.
And for rest, it is based on push-pull motion. What are the results of push-pull? Well, it can be this what we see, can be something else...and more.
@Albyint Nah. Laws in nature are just bits of observation that can be verified by multiple reliable sources. For example, on earth gravity pulls objects towards its core by certain amount. That is a law because it can be verified by so many sources. However, it dosent explane what causes gravity. It gives us a hint towards the right ansver, but it is not the ansver in it self.
do you want answers?...Look at the capacity of the brains function and storage. We only use 3 percent of its power in a lifetime!...What does that tell you?..What about DNA?...DNA dominates what and how we are and are going to be!...It´s all in the letters..in it´s codes! Earth and us...and electricity,the human electricity, when it goes off we die, when we die we decompose back to the earth...Universe, any system moved away an inch further or closer wed die.Where are the aliens?...
The theory/law of everything does exist. I have been working for the last 40 years of my life, putting my own theory/law that explains everything in this universe together.
That is currently being reviewed by very powerful scientists.
I respect Stephen's vast physics intelligence, but other than String Theory/ Quantum Physics formulas, Mr Spk and Spell is barely smarter than Michio Kaku. Stephen needs to create something with his knowledge before he's gone. Formulas that can build something new. Solve dark matter/energy. Otherwise, he's just another useless genius teaching college courses. He wants to be the man with the plan. Just do it Stephen!
this is 100% bullshit what you're saying. A person can be a god if he does a meritorious work. In the same way, a person can be an evil if he does all the bad things in his life. what the reward will you get after doing good deed? It is heaven but you get heaven when you're with understanding and create a good atmosphere around you where you are. Firstly, you should think about the present moment because you aware of it, then you try to make it more better by sharing your experiences.
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
@luniarxox Good. Now make predictions based into your HYPOTHESIS that could be tested and proofen by scientific method and/or mathemathics.
Your hypothesis has not been accepted to be theory yet im afraid, so dont call it theory. Theory is title reserved for ideas such as gravity, evolution etc. that have been tested and thus accepted to be theories.
@imthetank3 Actually gravity is theory. Theory is the highest official state that any idea in science can attain. Theory is the framework that attempts to explane something in nature. Large number of "facts", or "observations" are what leads into theory, but science assumes that it never knows everything, and what it knows could be proven false the next day.
This is not differend with gravity. We know how to calculate and predict it, but *we dont know what it is*.
@Propaani Science should stop calling theories theories. Dumb people get confused. Science should call them "This shit's real, bitches," That way dump people can easily distinguish between scientific this shit's real, bitches and their own personal theories. Are creationists going to say, "Evolution is just a this shit's real, bitches, and there are many opposing theories (they can't use our word)."
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
do you know how many witnesses there are for aliens? does that make them real? the only thing i can say is there is more Evidence for Aliens.. then there is for god... and if we cant see outside our own universe how can we ever expect to understand it? how can someone thousands of years ago even Hope to understand..?
the Bible itself is simply mans attempt at understanding that which he does not know.
"THE HISTORY OF TIME - From Big Bang to Black Hole" is the best scientific interpretation of AL QUR'AN, and also a "genuine bridgestone" for comprehensive study of Theology. Surprise, it is a miracle and blessing in disguise as well? So, it should be very wise for Muslim scholars to verify my discovery.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. He says Big Bang, not "Big Bang Theory" Nobody disputes Stephen Hawking because he proved there is no god, god didn't create the universe, please watch all his videos.. Cant dispute any video he has
@AnastheticsX He did not prove that there is no god. The universe did expand from a single point, but the theory doesn't explain what caused it, it didn't explain what created the laws of the universe, and saying that it just spontaneously popped into nothingness is just an opinion that holds no ground. There are no physical laws in our universe that deny the possibility of a god. If there are then why don't you try to explain them to me, and there's a difference between fact and opinion.
as Gravity explains not only how the universe was created, but how its been held together over time.
For example if you go back 15 billion years.. you would see that the Universe was made up of small particles. hydrogen. helium and such. some areas of these particles were more dense.. others were less dense... (do you need an explanation for what density is?) well due to GRAVITY. these dense areas and less dense areas Collided together.
@NickolusMcIe Over time... as these particles came together.. and became even MORE dense.. again GRAVITY started to do something amazing... pull them even closer together.. Over even more time as these much more dense particles collided due to gravity. They created an explosion known as the Big Bang.
Now why did these particles colliding create an explosion? Well.. what makes an Atomic Bomb so powerful?
Its the exact same for the beggining of our universe only on a much larger scale
@jonjon2034 I know what the big bang is, and I believe it happened. But, Hawking's theory for how the universe, pre big bang, was created is not backed up by any physical evidence. Because you still have failed to explain how those early particles got there in the first place. There is still no logical theory on how the pre big bang universe was created, except for God. An inter-universal being who exists in an area outside our own universe, and the entity which triggered the big bang.
@NickolusMcIe its like asking whats south of the south pole.....
also god didnt trigger the big bang... Gravity did... so the real question that remains is what made those early particles there in the first place. Science will gladly answer that once the technology is made to see further than 14.5 billion years away.
but trust its not some entity that decided it would happen.. its another logical process that we simply are not aware of..
@jonjon2034 exactly, jut like when we thought the world was flat, we just didnt know any better. Good on you your comment needs more likes, you are a logical person =P
@jonjon2034 I believe I've made my point. There is no physical evidence that rules out the existence of god. And you gotta ask yourself, if gravity created the big bang, who created gravity. There is no proof that it wasn't god.
@NickolusMcIe Then thats yet to be explained as we cant see anything past those particles.
Also if it is "GOD" then that means that our view (religion) is pointless and made up.... regardless im sure that if there is an all powerful creator of the universe then that creator itself would have a logical evolutionary explanation its not just some magic in the sky.
@jonjon2034 I don't think it's magic. And, I can't deny science. I was raised a christian so the only way for me to understand god is scientifically. It is hard for us to understand the possibility of something being eternal, but there's no proof that something can't be eternal. So it is logical to believe that God did not evolve from anything, that he wasn't created, he is eternal. It is also possible that time does not exist outside our universe, this would allow eternity.
@NickolusMcIe but nothing we see is eternal.. nothing.. not a single thing on this earth or in this universe is
eternal...
every element has a rate of decay.. every isotope has a half life. every thing that lives.. does in fact die.. with the exception of one jelly fish.. yet that wont survive our Sun's own imminent implosion.
Simply Look at the Life cycle of a star. and you will have every answer you need.
@jonjon2034 I agree that nothing in this universe is eternal. But, whose to say anything about what's outside the universe. I know there is no physical evidence that God isn't real. But there is also no physical evidence that he is. But the bible is full of witnesses who say they've seen God. There's a lot. And I'm not sure that all of them are liars. But I understand your doubt in God. I just want you to see that God is a possibility.
@jonjon2034 If nothing is eternal. So is god. I believe that there was once a god. It explains how some people do in fact believe in him but not all of us. Shapes of leaves, or the human's nature, i believe are god's creations. But as nothing is eternal, God isn't immortal. He created this place and then left just like every other thing.
@NickolusMcIe I just want to make it clear.. the Big Bang happened.. due to Gravity.
Gravity pulled small particles together. so Far that is our understanding. what caused those particles to arrive in empty space.. One thing is certain Time will tell.
@NickolusMcIe Imagine MILLIONS OF TRILLLIONS of Atomic Bombs going off at the same time.. and there you have it.. The Formation of the first stars to illuminate the darkness of space.
It is extremely hard to grasp the concept of 15 BILLION years...
Now we dont just randomly believe this happened we need proof. and the existence of the microwave background.. is that Proof. FURTHERMORE the microwave background itself is consistent with Dense areas, and slightly Less dense areas..
@jonjon2034@AnastheticsX I'm not disputing the fact that the big bang happened. I believe the big bang happened.But scientists still haven't proven what caused it. Or how the universe was created. The big bang theory only describes the expansion of the universe. Pre big bang the universe was still here, it just was very small and dense. Until scientists can answer these questions, a possible theory is still that god is the one who our universe, the big bang, and the laws of our universe.
That ''quantum mecanics'' bullshit is nothing compare to the real formula for succes.COMPASSION.But of course,don't matter how intelligent intellectuals are,they would not understand this.
the big bang theory says that the universe, and space, was contained in a small bead. And that there was no space around it. But if the universe was to expand, there had to be space around it for it to expand into. And it also says that the universe, pre big bang, had spontaneously popped into existence, as protons do on a quantum level. But there had to be some area for the universe to pop into. Explain that one Hawking!
@amaniacwithacar The laws of physics deny the possibility of things expanding into nothing. That makes absolutely no sense. This is the biggest hole in the theory. There is no proof whatsoever that things can arrive into nothingness. And saying that just because protons can pop into existence means the universe could pop into existence is just juvenile. There are several differences between the universe and a proton, so there is no reason that the same physical characteristics apply.
@NickolusMcIe 1. I never said protons just poped into existance( besides all matter is condensed energy)
2. the laws of Physics dont apply to objects outside the univese.
objects may never have just poped into existance and outside the univers is not nothingness It is an area in a forth dimention (this is where it gets confusing) and there may be othere univeses expanding and collapsing, sharing energy. to be honest were not sure our current technology is holding us back.
@amaniacwithacar Hawking is the one who said that some protons pop into existence. And I know about alternate universes. But, it's not illogical to think that maybe one of these universes is what we believe to be hell, and another to be heaven. And maybe death is some kind of inter universal transportation system. There is no evidence to tell us that this isn't possible. I'm just saying that religion can be scientifically explained.
i leave in a country where make imposible to explore or expose my ideas but i know i think humildimente that you are wrong. i dont wanna anouciate myself like the truth owner but i have a theory to make great thinkers analyze.just because i wanna discovery the true no matter the merit for me i call this theory like assumus insufisyas ideiagenial@hotmail.com
What a brain do we have humans..read first 4 words and think who did assume the Big Bang theory and was he a Muslim? "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing Then will they not believe? " so simply ALLAH or the one and only GOD we know talks about it what made the modern Muslims who read and hear about this theory hold there religion...read about Qura'an you will
I APOLOGIZE TO OUR GREAT THINKERS BUT I FEEL YOU INSULTING ME BY SAYING SOMETHING AS REMOVED AS "BIG BANG "AND " E=MC2" . THE UNIVERSE WAS ALWAYS HERE AND ALWAYS WILL BE ." E" DOESN'T NEED TO EQUAL"MC2" . BECAUSE " E=MASS TIMES SPEED , OR E=M*S . AN INANIMATE OBJECT HAVING ENERGY BECAUSE IT'S HURTLING THROUGH"TIME ." YOUR PHYSICS WILL NEVER RESOLVE ALL OF THE POSSIBILITIES OF THE UNIVERSE .
Ok god and hawkings have nothing in common hawkings is just out to find the way that this all happened thank god for us knowing what we know now its just sometimes people are lost in an hypothisized world (no offense ) but we have alot because of our scientists so dont judge people in how they think the world was made!!!!
I love all the debating so awesome but why does religion always get pulled into science videos.....hmm. well am a satanist which is not about evil in anyway i think people should learn about other religions and stop judging others there is evidence of past satanism in sumer predating chirst so there are a lot of concepts of gods and spirits before chirstians, muslims, etc but the problem is who created any of these beings a never ending chain of who created who.
Despite the pyschological experience of these events "feeling" as though they are events composed outside the body, they are in fact internally generated by activation of the brain from its own energy stores which ultimately yields a perculiar kind of self stimulating reality generation courtesy of the brain's management system known as dreams
It's all biologically defined and sorry no paranormal expos needed but is perfectly fascinating none the less :)
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
are functioning within the limits of the knowledge that did not cross to the other side, out of the inherited cognitive, here and now, knowledge, accessible to all within it’s achieved limits. 3/3
how there could be something that does not have beginning, entirely ore limits of coverage, body like. Other question is consisting of how it all is happening and why?; all that could be deduced and certainly accepted that world is appearing, transforming, ageing and disappearing, partially, just before our eyes, ground to all is energy that keeps everything in motion, and out of all limits, borders, the very problem to our everyday action, aspirations, experience, because we .. 2/3
frottage = Universe does not have limits ore the beginning, all that we are covering is an hypothetical through. Concluding the age of 14.7 billions of year [it’s just an insignificant fraction of time] since the BigBeng. First, age is not applicable at any extent; for if the entity of space is limitless it may mean the BigBengs are only possible at very distant spots and at variety of different times. Yet, there is a problem, it escapes humans imagination, .. 1/3
Einstein never failed! he may have left his work unfinished, due to to our mortality, but he left what he could for the future to consider and continue on with! Einstein is immortal in that way.
@Ogudaktig He is trying to prove he is better then einstein,but he is not,einstein was far far better then him...you are right he is immortal....he better respect God and Einstein
Symantics. Science is a word. God is a word. Observation is relative. Mathmatics is a language universally spoken. Perception is individual. If matter physically divided, at what point does it cease to be? What about energy? Conciousness? Do wee see reality? No, we percieve it to be what we believe it is. What we "see" as blue is really quite a compex process. but still a construct of the mind. It is a reaction. We are all as much wrong as we are right. 0=0. infinity = infinty.
@Pomme843 Hello. I just think that physicists study physics, and make great scientific contributions in their field. But like a telescope is designed to view light waves, another radio waves, etc, physics itself is not the entire universe.
I also totally understand that modern man has outgrown the past notions of God as Christianized, or Islamized, etc. But that does not rule out a balanced universe of a real Creator from which the "creation", or physical universe, has sprung, does it?
@fsmtdaler Hi. I think that the divide that we've conjured between physics and, say, chemistry or biology, is an artificial divide. That's to say: biology is simply complex physics, mathematics and mechanics. I believe the same thing goes for e.g. spirituality - it can be explained psychologically, biologically, from an evolutionary point-of-view, etc. And these fields can be explained through basal sciences.
I think there's no particular grounds on which to assume this God you pose, exists.
@Pomme843 In my youth, I rejected the "God" of Christian hypocrites because of the obvious racism on the Sioux Reservation I came from in South Dakota, the War in Viet Nam, non-scientific shell games (trinity, etc). Had to leave all the bull behind me because it stunk from decay.
Yet my Lakota friends, though very oppressed, retained (unless they succumbed to alcoholism and drugs) their belief in Wakan Tanka, the Great Spirit, with much dignity and patience.
@Pomme843 Eventually, after delving into Buddhist and Hindu faith, even reading the Quran in the 70's, a thread ran through it all which enabled me to "taste" an acceptable (mentally and spiritually) flavor to what flowed out from a common Source, like pure water from an artesian well which historically has been diluted, bottled, and peddled as "holy water" of some sort or other by ministers, mullahs, and even some medicine men or women.
As a Baha'i for 30 years now it fits together again
@Pomme843 As to poetry, there is mathematical harmony, etc. Similarly, compassion can be understood as harmony. In music, an octave is double, or half, etc.
So there is clearly a physical universe which our senses perceive and mind understands. The challenge, then, is the quest of a valid spiritual reality not steeped in myth or traditions alone, or simply echoes of what someone's ancestor's have handed down.
Each must independently search for truth, not mimic others.
@fsmtdaler Well, I think there's good reason to assume that the spiritual reality is a subjectively experienced product of the material reality. See the God Helmet, for instance.
The idea that each must search for truth independently seems to imply that reality is subjective, perhaps? I think that the truth is best found in cooperation with other sapient minds. This concept is founded upon the principle that factual observations of the material world are the primary means of examining reality.
@Pomme843 Very good insight. Our mind and senses reveal reality. Some speak of the physical eyes as viewing the external reality, while insight, which is totally subjective, lends itself to the recognition of metaphysical reality, or spiritual truths. This, however, tends to become clouded with imagination, and it is hard to discern where the one leaves off and the other begins. Therefore, individual search for truth is not only a right, but a responsibility. Would you agree, perhaps?
@fsmtdaler Maybe you should have paid more attention in your science class. Love, compassion and every emotion is caused by chemical reactions inside various parts of the brain. It is even possible to artificially make somebody happy or in love by stimulation certain parts of the brain. If you look around, there is a logical scientific explanation for everything. There are things that we can't explain, but that doesn't mean there is a god, it means we haven't found a way to understand it yet.
@Recurious Respectfully, I paid a great deal of attention in science class. I was athiest for quite some time, due to the hyposcrisy of the church and the repression of science. It is a mistake to deny the existence of an artist when examining the artwork as nothing but paint chemicals. I like the science, but have come to appreciate that behind all of the creative force of the infinite universe is a Source which gives its purpose. Some call that One: Allah, Jehovah, or Great Spirit
@t4kerz my house was haunted, things shaking crazily, objects flying around my room, and shadows reaching towards me while i was alone.. demons are real, as is god who saved me.
I tend to believe more in the Great Spirit than the Big Bang. There is something in being human that has exhibited a reverence and need to worship, both in primitive cultures and more progressive, or larger communities. It is innate.
In modern times, we naturally reject the simplistic traditional notions which have been handed to us.
Truth is truth, and there is no conflict if viewed properly, between science and sensible religions.
there is theory, there is something, there is nothing, nothing cannot exist from the point of view of something, yet it must exist for there to be something
One thing that has always bugged me, is when people start arguing about things like this, religious people doubting science, and others trying to 'enlighten' them. Etc.
I just wish that some people would realize that its opinion, and no amount of arguing can solve it.
It all comes down to "prove it," and "prove it wrong". No one can prove that any form of God exists, or does not exist. So why waste precious time arguing about the subject,
I'm all for this theory, but how do they know what it was like in the big bang? And how do they even know how it happen? It sorta bothers me cuz no one's ever really answered this in a way that made sense
@13Segruts I'm sure it bothers everyone who thinks about it, but i think as humans no matter how intelligent we become we can never know how the universe was created.
@13Segruts It doesn't make any sense to you because you've never took the initiative to use google search and read up and type big bang theory in youtube search either.
@splicedenergy Well, do remember that there are people nowadays that would rather insult you for a point that either you had wrong or they don't understand than actually learning or helping you learn. It's sad. I'd prefer it otherwise but, well, it's youtube. Home for retarded trolls. Anyway, try making fun of them instead of looking angry. It will be totally worth it.
@13Segruts Ill try to explain it to you real quick. Basically scientists has studied space, stars, galaxies, etc. and they contain evidence that indicates that the big bang is true. Such as galaxies. Galaxies have a red shift light that indicates that galaxies are moving away from us. They are expanding, therefore that gives prove that the big bang is true because the big bang is expansion. Basically everything in space is expanding and if you reverse it all it goes back into one paint in space.
even in science there is religion theirs just happens to be an infinatley dense ball of nothing that explode because chaos and chance agreed that it was the right moment to do so then that dust and energy combined and eventually became self aware to form the humans and animals alive today....totally reasonable
Time dosn t exist,so matter becomes finite right next to space which is finite,so devisions r for ever and life of the universe never ends,we might finished each other but life dosn t.
it is like a search for a center of space which is centerless,and is divideable into infinity by isolation of matter???
well everything begins after we start asking about it....we made letters,we made numbers,we made questions,we made answers,we made the word existence but not existence itself...we are confused because we made it confusing....
ive read genesis, there is no similarities WHATSOEVER.
if your comparing: In the begining, god created the heaven and earth...... to the big bang, then you may aswell compare it to the start of eastenders! ...its just a begining mate! also, "And God, after splitting the four unified forces of the universe, created quarks!"???? well, that would have been a lot better than talking snakes, feeding 100's of people with 2 loaves, and page after page of condradictory fairy tale cr*p.
@youtubkillable The multi verse has always existed. This could be called god, but cannot be called "he" since there isn't a gender to inanimate objects. Inanimate objects also cannot write books
@splicedenergy The multiverse has always existed? You are assuming that there is a multiverse, but there might not be. It is, after all, a hypothesis. However, let us suppose that there is a multiverse. What makes you think 'a priori' that it must have always existed? There must be something whose non-existence is impossible, but, even if there is a multiverse, this necessary reality doesn't have to be identified with it...
@bayreuth79 We do know there is more than our universe duh, and when you can bet your bottom dollar that only a god that had no beginning and is eternal but impossible for a natural process cannot be. Do you even notice how ridiculous that is? I figure you dont. We are little animals on a little planet in a teeny arm of an average galaxy and although all this is natural, you'll still insist god made it. You dont want to broaden your knowledge you want to show how little you are
@splicedenergy You are profoundly mistaken. We do not know that there is a multiverse! "The multiverse is a metaphysical guess" (Prof John Polkinghorne, world-class particle physicist, from Cambridge university). If you consult any physicist- such as Prof Hawking, Prof Kaku, etc,.- you will discover how wrong you are.
Your argument is absurd. There is no conflict between natural processes and God's creative activities. You have to distinguish between first and second order causality.
@bayreuth79 No I am not. I've read Hawkins books, I've seen pretty much every documentary by Kaku, I've watched every single episode of the 5 seasons of Universe, I've heard numerous lectures and documentaries with Brian Cox and Neil degrasse tyson, Micheal Sherman, the list goes on and on. I've also studied to great lengths of where all religions and gods through thousands of years became and evolved in that time. I know what I'm talking about, dont insult my intelligence again.
@splicedenergy Do you think it absurd that God had no beginning? If you do, I'm afraid you are in a bit of a bind. Earlier you said that that multiverse has always existed. If it has always existed, then it had no beginning. So, if there is no inherent contradiction in saying that the multiverse has no beginning, why not God? But of course the multiverse may not exist anyway. I'm afraid you need to broaden your knowledge because 1) you're ignorant of physics 2) you're ignorant of theology.
@bayreuth79 Have you ever heard of Brian Cox, Neil Degrassse Tyson, Micheal shermer, just to name a few. Its in the fucking math. There is no room for opinion when math is fact
@bayreuth79 Dont fucking insult my intelligence, this may be the internet but I use the internet, I use university, I use Scientific professors to tell me what the reality is and how they came about finding that reality. Not to mention I am a documentary junkie if there ever was one.; Stop talking to me if you are going to be a fallacious unwarranted snob
@splicedenergy I just quoted a physicist from Cambridge university. You quote a physicist who claims to know that there is a multiverse.
I have degrees from Cambridge (uk) and Yale (U.S). I'm telling you that you have no idea whatsoever about physics and you are certainly ignorant of what we mean by "God".
@bayreuth79 You honestly are so stupid to believe that I am stupid enough to believe you are an ivy league educated person and yet sitting at a pc somewhere arguing on you tube about physics and it was gods formula, I'm not stupid. But you most definitely are stupid enough to not know when to stop being and saying stupid things. 1 quote mine gives you just as much credibility as you began with. I gave you world renowned astrophysicists and you made shit up from scratch. Congrats, you fail
@CrippledKnight I have a great thirst for knowledge I can never seem to quench, insulting my intelligence is about the worst thing someone can say to me. And there is no way he is an Ivy league graduate, since the dumb ass simply said ivy league instead of actually calling it by name, or say such retarded shit to make himself look like he's something he obviously is not. He's a lying prick bastard
@bayreuth79 There are thousands of gods, you have one in mind. It doesn't matter who, because all the who's who in the fairy tales amount to the same chunk of bullshit as the rest. I took theology at William and Mary for 5 enlightening years. I went in Pentecostal and came out feeling betrayed spewed upon and manipulated in speech and song. They are all wrong and they know it, all religions have to do and say to have anyone left in the pews at the end of the day. Im not living in lies anymore
@bayreuth79 Well you best start naming the 10s of thousands of gods and narrowing the one that "created" the universe, then get it peer reviewed and critiqued and perhaps I will concede then. But only then. I'll bet you cant even tell me how many jesus's are living right now this very minute. Do not presume to know a god damn thing
inner electron orbits can be exactly calculated by elliptic functions (see Klaus Huber Cauer Filters) - it also supports more exact calculation for satellite obits
- the universe is not as uncalculable but is a wonder of symmetry and we should be grateful to be allowed to have a small glimpse of the order - Einstein and Bohr are restored - and S.Hawking is awesome
Quran: Do they beleive that GOD made him for Nothing.yet they don,t believe on GOD
i think its the best answer in the world that we don,t know nothing we don,t have even a glimpse of knowledge of GOD yet he is the one because if GOD was more than 2 i bet The 2nd GOD will show him self during the 15 billion years to unsolve this mystery of god.
if you don,t beleive on GOD just give me a simple scientific defination that proves that big bang was a anonymous process
@theWACKIIRAQI ever occured to anyone why world leading scientests and inventors are athiests? or atleast, God had no intervention/place in their productions??
_____
He who makes such a claim, the answer will be that though in both these matters man's planning and action have played a role, yet the means whereby his planning and action achieve the goal, is a gift from the bounty of Allah Almighty, underlying therein.
Supposing he had not been gifted with the tonnage for speech, or the intellect had not been bestowed on him to guide him to such activity, he could never have been able to talk, and if he had not been blessed with the palm and the fingers, it would never have been possible for him to write.
You should learn a lesson from the animals in this behalf, who lave neither the power to speak nor the power to write. As such it is the principle laid down by the Almighty Creator for man's fundamental nature as a special boon, for which whoever is grateful shall get the heavenly rewards, while whoever denies will be ignored, for Allah Almighty is independent of the whole universe.
@1tabligh my answer to you is simple my friend....EVOLUTION...seriously you are arguing that we developed speech because god decided to? do u have anything to back up ur claim? i can claim any thing in the world but i can only be awarded for the things i can prove achieved
Many new questions in regard to almost every principle mentioned by Darwin have arisen. For example, it is asked whether the appearance of a new organ or for that matter any other organic change, always results from the use of that organ and the attempt to adapt it to one's environment or it may be due to mutation or any other cause?
The acquired qualities are hereditable as a principle or genetic investigations have rejected this theory?
The organic changes, whatever may be their cause, are always aimed at survival and evolution or sometimes they may be due to the inconsistency with the environmental conditions and may culminate in death and extinction?
Natural selection is or is not like artificial selection which leads the existing generation to evolution?
@1tabligh dude..you are a typical case of lost and confused 21st century creationist..as soon as any of you (specially Muslims) get cornered you start going on and on with lots and lots of excess and unnecessary informations/myths to detour the conversation...
one last thing...I will wait for scientists like him (Mr Hawkins) and others to explain why we exist in the universe..not you and some books written by a business man (mohamed) or a carpenter (jesus) 1500-2000 years ago.
@1tabligh hey...do you know how to make a useful sentence for a change? do you know where to use question marks? i am so sorry that this conversation is becoming more and more personal due to the fact that I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE U TALKING ABOUT
@1tabligh 1-If u can simplify the question u'd do me a huge favor cuz my language is arabic so im trying my best.2-religious advocates been mumbling for the last 2000 years..what did they bring to the human civilization other than judging and persecution?.3.western scientists been answering the big questions very successfully as soon as they had the freedom to do so (renaissance) barely 200 yrs ago. what did the church/mosque bring to us other than destruction?
@theWACKIIRAQI We find that the wild animals and plants are alike and of average type, whereas the artificial selection gives the animals and plants more variety and leads them to better evolution. There are many other questions of this sort. Anyhow, in spite of all the objections raised to discredit it, the theory of evolution has been accepted by the scientists as an objective principle of natural sciences. At the same time it is also certain that prominent and unbiased naturalists do not
i know the theory of everything
MERJOATLOR 2 months ago
Answer to everything is number ONE. Or just ONE, to be precise.
If you have 2 or more, then it is contained in 1...something. So, everything is one, and the rest is just 0.00000000...... of one. It's not a dividation or something splitted, it's just something that exist.
And for rest, it is based on push-pull motion. What are the results of push-pull? Well, it can be this what we see, can be something else...and more.
neXus200xx 2 months ago
I would really like for him to give a response to this theorycompo.blogspot.c om/2011/12/great-mysteries .h tml
xlactyu15 2 months ago
@xlactyu15 You gotta fix the link in com and html by the way
xlactyu15 2 months ago
@Albyint Nah. Laws in nature are just bits of observation that can be verified by multiple reliable sources. For example, on earth gravity pulls objects towards its core by certain amount. That is a law because it can be verified by so many sources. However, it dosent explane what causes gravity. It gives us a hint towards the right ansver, but it is not the ansver in it self.
Propaani 2 months ago
@luniarxox only problems are two fundamental yet complex questions 1.What defines positive and negative? More importantly 2. what defines neutrality?
NumeralKillerlive 2 months ago
do you want answers?...Look at the capacity of the brains function and storage. We only use 3 percent of its power in a lifetime!...What does that tell you?..What about DNA?...DNA dominates what and how we are and are going to be!...It´s all in the letters..in it´s codes! Earth and us...and electricity,the human electricity, when it goes off we die, when we die we decompose back to the earth...Universe, any system moved away an inch further or closer wed die.Where are the aliens?...
jeyceman 3 months ago
Um, that was Hawkward.
christiskingofall 4 months ago
it is the red ring of death on xbox
Ironjagg 4 months ago
Hello fellow human beings.
The theory/law of everything does exist. I have been working for the last 40 years of my life, putting my own theory/law that explains everything in this universe together.
That is currently being reviewed by very powerful scientists.
iGeniusOne 4 months ago 2
I respect Stephen's vast physics intelligence, but other than String Theory/ Quantum Physics formulas, Mr Spk and Spell is barely smarter than Michio Kaku. Stephen needs to create something with his knowledge before he's gone. Formulas that can build something new. Solve dark matter/energy. Otherwise, he's just another useless genius teaching college courses. He wants to be the man with the plan. Just do it Stephen!
Boogyman4050 4 months ago
this is 100% bullshit what you're saying. A person can be a god if he does a meritorious work. In the same way, a person can be an evil if he does all the bad things in his life. what the reward will you get after doing good deed? It is heaven but you get heaven when you're with understanding and create a good atmosphere around you where you are. Firstly, you should think about the present moment because you aware of it, then you try to make it more better by sharing your experiences.
bodhi432 5 months ago in playlist Stephen HAWKIN
I'm looking for updated Tv-shows about science can anyone advice me something?thanks
Pizarroconquer 5 months ago
hey i just came up with a new theory while i was high. its called the 2bit theory. there is either a positive or a negative and that is the law of everything that exists / existed / will exist. Examples : it either exists or it doesn't exist / either positive and negative matter (dark matter) and even complex things like good and evil. if u look around everything in the world has 2 sides. and then multiple things other than + and - form from combining + - in different patterns like a computer
luniarxox 6 months ago
@luniarxox Good. Now make predictions based into your HYPOTHESIS that could be tested and proofen by scientific method and/or mathemathics.
Your hypothesis has not been accepted to be theory yet im afraid, so dont call it theory. Theory is title reserved for ideas such as gravity, evolution etc. that have been tested and thus accepted to be theories.
Propaani 5 months ago 3
@Propaani Gravity isnt a theory, Its a law. Theory is a beleif, like God and the big bang, Cannot be 100% proven thus its a theory.
imthetank3 4 months ago
@imthetank3 Actually gravity is theory. Theory is the highest official state that any idea in science can attain. Theory is the framework that attempts to explane something in nature. Large number of "facts", or "observations" are what leads into theory, but science assumes that it never knows everything, and what it knows could be proven false the next day.
This is not differend with gravity. We know how to calculate and predict it, but *we dont know what it is*.
Propaani 4 months ago 10
@Propaani I thought laws where the highest state that any idea can attain?
Or maybe laws are just things that will happen and not the theory itself? *is confused*
Albyint 2 months ago
@Propaani Science should stop calling theories theories. Dumb people get confused. Science should call them "This shit's real, bitches," That way dump people can easily distinguish between scientific this shit's real, bitches and their own personal theories. Are creationists going to say, "Evolution is just a this shit's real, bitches, and there are many opposing theories (they can't use our word)."
Snakepliskinist 1 month ago 2
@Snakepliskinist Hearing people use "theory" in the wrong context when talking about science is the easiest way to sort out the stupid people on YT.
55metalmonkey 3 weeks ago
@Snakepliskinist well well, a youtuber with a brain. nice job friend. i love meeting people with a brain. you rock!
nannynicky4life 1 week ago
@Propaani I've heard a principle is the "highest" state of any idea in science.
orielonline 1 week ago
Dear All Stephen Hawking Fans
Please All this is not right
Have A look on my Theory Of Everything Cracked on Todays Post
2930sid 6 months ago
Unification of Isolated science and GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA and read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist are welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
vk sonakia
unified field scientist
bhopal
INDIA
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
vksonakia 6 months ago
Big bang is to porsche what uniontera is to ferrari.
uniontera 6 months ago
Cool
MrJoal07 6 months ago
There is no afterlife, only energy existing in various states...
MrJoal07 6 months ago
do you know how many witnesses there are for aliens? does that make them real? the only thing i can say is there is more Evidence for Aliens.. then there is for god... and if we cant see outside our own universe how can we ever expect to understand it? how can someone thousands of years ago even Hope to understand..?
the Bible itself is simply mans attempt at understanding that which he does not know.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
how did Einstein escape the holocaust?
mtlhcdom 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"THE HISTORY OF TIME - From Big Bang to Black Hole" is the best scientific interpretation of AL QUR'AN, and also a "genuine bridgestone" for comprehensive study of Theology. Surprise, it is a miracle and blessing in disguise as well? So, it should be very wise for Muslim scholars to verify my discovery.
NeoSUFI visionary strategic thinking.
TatoSugiarto 6 months ago in playlist Steven Hawking
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. He says Big Bang, not "Big Bang Theory" Nobody disputes Stephen Hawking because he proved there is no god, god didn't create the universe, please watch all his videos.. Cant dispute any video he has
AnastheticsX 6 months ago
@AnastheticsX He did not prove that there is no god. The universe did expand from a single point, but the theory doesn't explain what caused it, it didn't explain what created the laws of the universe, and saying that it just spontaneously popped into nothingness is just an opinion that holds no ground. There are no physical laws in our universe that deny the possibility of a god. If there are then why don't you try to explain them to me, and there's a difference between fact and opinion.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe Here one.
Gravity.
as Gravity explains not only how the universe was created, but how its been held together over time.
For example if you go back 15 billion years.. you would see that the Universe was made up of small particles. hydrogen. helium and such. some areas of these particles were more dense.. others were less dense... (do you need an explanation for what density is?) well due to GRAVITY. these dense areas and less dense areas Collided together.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe Over time... as these particles came together.. and became even MORE dense.. again GRAVITY started to do something amazing... pull them even closer together.. Over even more time as these much more dense particles collided due to gravity. They created an explosion known as the Big Bang.
Now why did these particles colliding create an explosion? Well.. what makes an Atomic Bomb so powerful?
Its the exact same for the beggining of our universe only on a much larger scale
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 I know what the big bang is, and I believe it happened. But, Hawking's theory for how the universe, pre big bang, was created is not backed up by any physical evidence. Because you still have failed to explain how those early particles got there in the first place. There is still no logical theory on how the pre big bang universe was created, except for God. An inter-universal being who exists in an area outside our own universe, and the entity which triggered the big bang.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe its like asking whats south of the south pole.....
also god didnt trigger the big bang... Gravity did... so the real question that remains is what made those early particles there in the first place. Science will gladly answer that once the technology is made to see further than 14.5 billion years away.
but trust its not some entity that decided it would happen.. its another logical process that we simply are not aware of..
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 exactly, jut like when we thought the world was flat, we just didnt know any better. Good on you your comment needs more likes, you are a logical person =P
al1511 6 months ago
@al1511 Thats the point exactly.. we simply dont know any better at the present time.
just like when we thought witches existed...and santa..
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 I believe I've made my point. There is no physical evidence that rules out the existence of god. And you gotta ask yourself, if gravity created the big bang, who created gravity. There is no proof that it wasn't god.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe Then thats yet to be explained as we cant see anything past those particles.
Also if it is "GOD" then that means that our view (religion) is pointless and made up.... regardless im sure that if there is an all powerful creator of the universe then that creator itself would have a logical evolutionary explanation its not just some magic in the sky.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 I don't think it's magic. And, I can't deny science. I was raised a christian so the only way for me to understand god is scientifically. It is hard for us to understand the possibility of something being eternal, but there's no proof that something can't be eternal. So it is logical to believe that God did not evolve from anything, that he wasn't created, he is eternal. It is also possible that time does not exist outside our universe, this would allow eternity.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe but nothing we see is eternal.. nothing.. not a single thing on this earth or in this universe is
eternal...
every element has a rate of decay.. every isotope has a half life. every thing that lives.. does in fact die.. with the exception of one jelly fish.. yet that wont survive our Sun's own imminent implosion.
Simply Look at the Life cycle of a star. and you will have every answer you need.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 I agree that nothing in this universe is eternal. But, whose to say anything about what's outside the universe. I know there is no physical evidence that God isn't real. But there is also no physical evidence that he is. But the bible is full of witnesses who say they've seen God. There's a lot. And I'm not sure that all of them are liars. But I understand your doubt in God. I just want you to see that God is a possibility.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 If nothing is eternal. So is god. I believe that there was once a god. It explains how some people do in fact believe in him but not all of us. Shapes of leaves, or the human's nature, i believe are god's creations. But as nothing is eternal, God isn't immortal. He created this place and then left just like every other thing.
pwnsocks 6 months ago
@pwnsocks Just like everything else on this planet and in the universe..when something dies or passes on.. it leaves Evidence..
There is no evidence of there Ever being a god.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe I just want to make it clear.. the Big Bang happened.. due to Gravity.
Gravity pulled small particles together. so Far that is our understanding. what caused those particles to arrive in empty space.. One thing is certain Time will tell.
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe Imagine MILLIONS OF TRILLLIONS of Atomic Bombs going off at the same time.. and there you have it.. The Formation of the first stars to illuminate the darkness of space.
It is extremely hard to grasp the concept of 15 BILLION years...
Now we dont just randomly believe this happened we need proof. and the existence of the microwave background.. is that Proof. FURTHERMORE the microwave background itself is consistent with Dense areas, and slightly Less dense areas..
jonjon2034 6 months ago
@jonjon2034 @AnastheticsX I'm not disputing the fact that the big bang happened. I believe the big bang happened.But scientists still haven't proven what caused it. Or how the universe was created. The big bang theory only describes the expansion of the universe. Pre big bang the universe was still here, it just was very small and dense. Until scientists can answer these questions, a possible theory is still that god is the one who our universe, the big bang, and the laws of our universe.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
That ''quantum mecanics'' bullshit is nothing compare to the real formula for succes.COMPASSION.But of course,don't matter how intelligent intellectuals are,they would not understand this.
TOLTECAAZTECA 7 months ago
the big bang theory says that the universe, and space, was contained in a small bead. And that there was no space around it. But if the universe was to expand, there had to be space around it for it to expand into. And it also says that the universe, pre big bang, had spontaneously popped into existence, as protons do on a quantum level. But there had to be some area for the universe to pop into. Explain that one Hawking!
NickolusMcIe 7 months ago
@NickolusMcIe No It did not expand into an area, area itself expanded, the very fabric of the universe expanded, not just the matter!
amaniacwithacar 6 months ago
@amaniacwithacar The laws of physics deny the possibility of things expanding into nothing. That makes absolutely no sense. This is the biggest hole in the theory. There is no proof whatsoever that things can arrive into nothingness. And saying that just because protons can pop into existence means the universe could pop into existence is just juvenile. There are several differences between the universe and a proton, so there is no reason that the same physical characteristics apply.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe 1. I never said protons just poped into existance( besides all matter is condensed energy)
2. the laws of Physics dont apply to objects outside the univese.
objects may never have just poped into existance and outside the univers is not nothingness It is an area in a forth dimention (this is where it gets confusing) and there may be othere univeses expanding and collapsing, sharing energy. to be honest were not sure our current technology is holding us back.
amaniacwithacar 6 months ago
@amaniacwithacar Hawking is the one who said that some protons pop into existence. And I know about alternate universes. But, it's not illogical to think that maybe one of these universes is what we believe to be hell, and another to be heaven. And maybe death is some kind of inter universal transportation system. There is no evidence to tell us that this isn't possible. I'm just saying that religion can be scientifically explained.
NickolusMcIe 6 months ago
@NickolusMcIe We dont know how the universe formed just that is and has been expanding from a single point.
amaniacwithacar 6 months ago
Brilliant just brilliant!!!!!!
RedKnight61 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i leave in a country where make imposible to explore or expose my ideas but i know i think humildimente that you are wrong. i dont wanna anouciate myself like the truth owner but i have a theory to make great thinkers analyze.just because i wanna discovery the true no matter the merit for me i call this theory like assumus insufisyas ideiagenial@hotmail.com
LEOMALONY 7 months ago
What a brain do we have humans..read first 4 words and think who did assume the Big Bang theory and was he a Muslim? "Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing Then will they not believe? " so simply ALLAH or the one and only GOD we know talks about it what made the modern Muslims who read and hear about this theory hold there religion...read about Qura'an you will
mhbnymn 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mhbnymn Allah was created by humans, my friend. Not the other way around.
GluttonForSex 7 months ago
Those Atoms and stuff came from a Trillion plus year old Creator Yahweh, give it back! No one knows His true age Because He don't age :) ha ha!
OnBootyDuty 7 months ago
I APOLOGIZE TO OUR GREAT THINKERS BUT I FEEL YOU INSULTING ME BY SAYING SOMETHING AS REMOVED AS "BIG BANG "AND " E=MC2" . THE UNIVERSE WAS ALWAYS HERE AND ALWAYS WILL BE ." E" DOESN'T NEED TO EQUAL"MC2" . BECAUSE " E=MASS TIMES SPEED , OR E=M*S . AN INANIMATE OBJECT HAVING ENERGY BECAUSE IT'S HURTLING THROUGH"TIME ." YOUR PHYSICS WILL NEVER RESOLVE ALL OF THE POSSIBILITIES OF THE UNIVERSE .
GIANFRANCO FRONZI .JULY/ 15 /2011
9493760 7 months ago
@9493760
EVEN WHEN USING CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL NEED TO STEER.
MrLaz0rz 7 months ago
Ok god and hawkings have nothing in common hawkings is just out to find the way that this all happened thank god for us knowing what we know now its just sometimes people are lost in an hypothisized world (no offense ) but we have alot because of our scientists so dont judge people in how they think the world was made!!!!
MrStaletoast 8 months ago
I love all the debating so awesome but why does religion always get pulled into science videos.....hmm. well am a satanist which is not about evil in anyway i think people should learn about other religions and stop judging others there is evidence of past satanism in sumer predating chirst so there are a lot of concepts of gods and spirits before chirstians, muslims, etc but the problem is who created any of these beings a never ending chain of who created who.
DemonicSamurai6 8 months ago
If the universe, our universe, started once, could a technically unreachable one or perhaps even much more have started when or after our's did?
DustyPengwin 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Despite the pyschological experience of these events "feeling" as though they are events composed outside the body, they are in fact internally generated by activation of the brain from its own energy stores which ultimately yields a perculiar kind of self stimulating reality generation courtesy of the brain's management system known as dreams
It's all biologically defined and sorry no paranormal expos needed but is perfectly fascinating none the less :)
1DreamWarrior 8 months ago
i have a large cunt
fdr100100 8 months ago
His voice sounds like crap! And what he is saying is very stupid and wrong!
TheJojo812 9 months ago
@TheJojo812
Don't you fucking dare insult the man for his voice.
Narupriest 8 months ago in playlist steven hawking
@Canadian2 I think there is intelligent design
Someone or something controls what goes on
TheKlempYz 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question, is there such a thing as "random"?
I'v been trying to figure out what the hell is going on around me since the age of 17ish, im now 25 and this is the conclusion iv came to according to what iv leard from science...
Life/everything is a bunch of exact reactions happening on a quantum level.
So if this is true, that means since the big bang, everthing is/was destined to happen in an exact way. Inculding my own thoughts...and that kinda scares me
Canadian2 9 months ago
@Canadian2 very interesting!! thank you for that input!!
dalooloo28 8 months ago
are functioning within the limits of the knowledge that did not cross to the other side, out of the inherited cognitive, here and now, knowledge, accessible to all within it’s achieved limits. 3/3
accountoneonone 9 months ago in playlist Steven Hawkings Universe
how there could be something that does not have beginning, entirely ore limits of coverage, body like. Other question is consisting of how it all is happening and why?; all that could be deduced and certainly accepted that world is appearing, transforming, ageing and disappearing, partially, just before our eyes, ground to all is energy that keeps everything in motion, and out of all limits, borders, the very problem to our everyday action, aspirations, experience, because we .. 2/3
accountoneonone 9 months ago in playlist Steven Hawkings Universe
frottage = Universe does not have limits ore the beginning, all that we are covering is an hypothetical through. Concluding the age of 14.7 billions of year [it’s just an insignificant fraction of time] since the BigBeng. First, age is not applicable at any extent; for if the entity of space is limitless it may mean the BigBengs are only possible at very distant spots and at variety of different times. Yet, there is a problem, it escapes humans imagination, .. 1/3
accountoneonone 9 months ago in playlist Steven Hawkings Universe
He is so fucking creepy.
TheRemixdudes 9 months ago
@toltecazteca Go back to hicktown you hillbilly
MathDesm 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If we have God in our hearts..Then why do we need that asshole Hawking for?
TOLTECAAZTECA 9 months ago
theres a word everyone here need too look up TOLERANCE XD seriusly
AdolphX 9 months ago
here's the big answer theoreticalphysics.webs.com god is logic
paginipro 9 months ago
Einstein never failed! he may have left his work unfinished, due to to our mortality, but he left what he could for the future to consider and continue on with! Einstein is immortal in that way.
Ogudaktig 9 months ago 45
@Ogudaktig He is trying to prove he is better then einstein,but he is not,einstein was far far better then him...you are right he is immortal....he better respect God and Einstein
jaunsariabhishek 8 months ago
@Ogudaktig ...and a thief
alabalacr2 8 months ago
@Ogudaktig ughhh he also refused to believe in black holes
bassman910 7 months ago 14
@bassman910 And they are still not proven, it is only theory
123peadar 6 months ago
@bassman910 who? Stephen Hawking? no way
salviileo 2 months ago
@Ogudaktig Einstein would be apalled at Hawking for thinking that there is no God. Hawking is clever, but didn't explain much.
TripleAgent83 7 months ago
@Ogudaktig no, science and our greatest accomplishments are immortal. ;)
mattysimsoficial 5 months ago
00:23 They see me rollin!
torbru1 10 months ago
i head hurts T.T
verserkboy 10 months ago
Symantics. Science is a word. God is a word. Observation is relative. Mathmatics is a language universally spoken. Perception is individual. If matter physically divided, at what point does it cease to be? What about energy? Conciousness? Do wee see reality? No, we percieve it to be what we believe it is. What we "see" as blue is really quite a compex process. but still a construct of the mind. It is a reaction. We are all as much wrong as we are right. 0=0. infinity = infinty.
Noktirnal 10 months ago
I think god is just an excuse for people who can't really grasp concepts like the big bang
deeryit 10 months ago
Stephen Hawkings.... What a little scamp.
difficultsyllables 10 months ago
Big Bang "particles" do not explain where ideas, love, and compassion come from.
How does poetry come from a universe composed only of protons, neutrons, etc.
Are all of the Native Americans wrong in reverencing the Great Spirit?
Explain mourning in a purely physics observations.
Physics is awesome, but it is limited to physics, yet valuable.
Modern ideas of God are more sophisticated, beyond past infantile myth.
True science and true religion are compatible. Baha'i perspective sheds light
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@fsmtdaler Exactly what part of poetry or compassion can't be explained in strictly materialistic terms?
Pomme843 10 months ago
@Pomme843 Hello. I just think that physicists study physics, and make great scientific contributions in their field. But like a telescope is designed to view light waves, another radio waves, etc, physics itself is not the entire universe.
I also totally understand that modern man has outgrown the past notions of God as Christianized, or Islamized, etc. But that does not rule out a balanced universe of a real Creator from which the "creation", or physical universe, has sprung, does it?
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@fsmtdaler Hi. I think that the divide that we've conjured between physics and, say, chemistry or biology, is an artificial divide. That's to say: biology is simply complex physics, mathematics and mechanics. I believe the same thing goes for e.g. spirituality - it can be explained psychologically, biologically, from an evolutionary point-of-view, etc. And these fields can be explained through basal sciences.
I think there's no particular grounds on which to assume this God you pose, exists.
Pomme843 10 months ago
@Pomme843 In my youth, I rejected the "God" of Christian hypocrites because of the obvious racism on the Sioux Reservation I came from in South Dakota, the War in Viet Nam, non-scientific shell games (trinity, etc). Had to leave all the bull behind me because it stunk from decay.
Yet my Lakota friends, though very oppressed, retained (unless they succumbed to alcoholism and drugs) their belief in Wakan Tanka, the Great Spirit, with much dignity and patience.
This warmed me up some.
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@Pomme843 Eventually, after delving into Buddhist and Hindu faith, even reading the Quran in the 70's, a thread ran through it all which enabled me to "taste" an acceptable (mentally and spiritually) flavor to what flowed out from a common Source, like pure water from an artesian well which historically has been diluted, bottled, and peddled as "holy water" of some sort or other by ministers, mullahs, and even some medicine men or women.
As a Baha'i for 30 years now it fits together again
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@Pomme843 As to poetry, there is mathematical harmony, etc. Similarly, compassion can be understood as harmony. In music, an octave is double, or half, etc.
So there is clearly a physical universe which our senses perceive and mind understands. The challenge, then, is the quest of a valid spiritual reality not steeped in myth or traditions alone, or simply echoes of what someone's ancestor's have handed down.
Each must independently search for truth, not mimic others.
I "feel" spirit
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@fsmtdaler Well, I think there's good reason to assume that the spiritual reality is a subjectively experienced product of the material reality. See the God Helmet, for instance.
The idea that each must search for truth independently seems to imply that reality is subjective, perhaps? I think that the truth is best found in cooperation with other sapient minds. This concept is founded upon the principle that factual observations of the material world are the primary means of examining reality.
Pomme843 10 months ago
@Pomme843 Very good insight. Our mind and senses reveal reality. Some speak of the physical eyes as viewing the external reality, while insight, which is totally subjective, lends itself to the recognition of metaphysical reality, or spiritual truths. This, however, tends to become clouded with imagination, and it is hard to discern where the one leaves off and the other begins. Therefore, individual search for truth is not only a right, but a responsibility. Would you agree, perhaps?
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@fsmtdaler Maybe you should have paid more attention in your science class. Love, compassion and every emotion is caused by chemical reactions inside various parts of the brain. It is even possible to artificially make somebody happy or in love by stimulation certain parts of the brain. If you look around, there is a logical scientific explanation for everything. There are things that we can't explain, but that doesn't mean there is a god, it means we haven't found a way to understand it yet.
Recurious 10 months ago
@Recurious Respectfully, I paid a great deal of attention in science class. I was athiest for quite some time, due to the hyposcrisy of the church and the repression of science. It is a mistake to deny the existence of an artist when examining the artwork as nothing but paint chemicals. I like the science, but have come to appreciate that behind all of the creative force of the infinite universe is a Source which gives its purpose. Some call that One: Allah, Jehovah, or Great Spirit
fsmtdaler 10 months ago
@t4kerz my house was haunted, things shaking crazily, objects flying around my room, and shadows reaching towards me while i was alone.. demons are real, as is god who saved me.
sk8fanatic823 10 months ago
i want to take this seriously. i really do. but his voice just gets me.
therandomnessgogo 10 months ago
@t4kerz
the closest ultimate god we can ever reach is the universe it self
asle666 10 months ago
He sets off to find "the single theory of everything". lol
cindernation12 10 months ago
I tend to believe more in the Great Spirit than the Big Bang. There is something in being human that has exhibited a reverence and need to worship, both in primitive cultures and more progressive, or larger communities. It is innate.
In modern times, we naturally reject the simplistic traditional notions which have been handed to us.
Truth is truth, and there is no conflict if viewed properly, between science and sensible religions.
fsmtdaler 11 months ago
eat that with your god atheist - who else thinks that steven hawkins is just an iPod sent back in time to destroy human kind?
heyZuesification 11 months ago
oh, and something doesn't exist from nothings point of view, because nothing doesn't have a point of view
heyZuesification 11 months ago
there is theory, there is something, there is nothing, nothing cannot exist from the point of view of something, yet it must exist for there to be something
heyZuesification 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SiGDiGS Why dont you read The Christ Conspiracy The Greatest Story Ever Told, I'll give you the pdf free
splicedenergy 11 months ago
One thing that has always bugged me, is when people start arguing about things like this, religious people doubting science, and others trying to 'enlighten' them. Etc.
I just wish that some people would realize that its opinion, and no amount of arguing can solve it.
It all comes down to "prove it," and "prove it wrong". No one can prove that any form of God exists, or does not exist. So why waste precious time arguing about the subject,
JimmyScene69 11 months ago
I'm all for this theory, but how do they know what it was like in the big bang? And how do they even know how it happen? It sorta bothers me cuz no one's ever really answered this in a way that made sense
13Segruts 11 months ago
@13Segruts thats because it doesnt make sense unless you want it to
TheHaloop 11 months ago
@13Segruts I'm sure it bothers everyone who thinks about it, but i think as humans no matter how intelligent we become we can never know how the universe was created.
RecordsTK6 11 months ago
@13Segruts It doesn't make any sense to you because you've never took the initiative to use google search and read up and type big bang theory in youtube search either.
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@splicedenergy Well, do remember that there are people nowadays that would rather insult you for a point that either you had wrong or they don't understand than actually learning or helping you learn. It's sad. I'd prefer it otherwise but, well, it's youtube. Home for retarded trolls. Anyway, try making fun of them instead of looking angry. It will be totally worth it.
CrippledKnight 11 months ago
@13Segruts Ill try to explain it to you real quick. Basically scientists has studied space, stars, galaxies, etc. and they contain evidence that indicates that the big bang is true. Such as galaxies. Galaxies have a red shift light that indicates that galaxies are moving away from us. They are expanding, therefore that gives prove that the big bang is true because the big bang is expansion. Basically everything in space is expanding and if you reverse it all it goes back into one paint in space.
MW2Addiction 9 months ago
even in science there is religion theirs just happens to be an infinatley dense ball of nothing that explode because chaos and chance agreed that it was the right moment to do so then that dust and energy combined and eventually became self aware to form the humans and animals alive today....totally reasonable
shopadrop 11 months ago
@shopadrop lol u dont know what ur talkin about
BelgianBasterd 10 months ago
42
YamiPoyo 11 months ago
@neruyamanouchi
dat? WTF is THAT supposed to mean>??
isuav8r234 11 months ago
it's a logical contradiction to say "time began".
Wittgensteinism 11 months ago
Time dosn t exist,so matter becomes finite right next to space which is finite,so devisions r for ever and life of the universe never ends,we might finished each other but life dosn t.
it is like a search for a center of space which is centerless,and is divideable into infinity by isolation of matter???
saharDJAMS 11 months ago
well everything begins after we start asking about it....we made letters,we made numbers,we made questions,we made answers,we made the word existence but not existence itself...we are confused because we made it confusing....
josh120504 11 months ago
@josh120504 we just don't know enuf :p it's all about theories that could all be disproven by a single discovery
it makes me sad that i won't live long enuf to find out more about the universe
ishopinamsterdam 11 months ago
@josh120504 why do you say that ? Please elaborate ?
shoshenkis 11 months ago
@SiGDiGS
ive read genesis, there is no similarities WHATSOEVER.
if your comparing: In the begining, god created the heaven and earth...... to the big bang, then you may aswell compare it to the start of eastenders! ...its just a begining mate! also, "And God, after splitting the four unified forces of the universe, created quarks!"???? well, that would have been a lot better than talking snakes, feeding 100's of people with 2 loaves, and page after page of condradictory fairy tale cr*p.
BIGDUNK33 1 year ago
THUMBS UP: if this is bullshit and god made us you stupid FUCKING BITCH!
youtubkillable 1 year ago
@youtubkillable you dis all other possibilities of how life began, your god created everything right??....then who created ur god.
xPhenoMxX 1 year ago
@xPhenoMxX uhm he was always there...?
youtubkillable 1 year ago
@youtubkillable The multi verse has always existed. This could be called god, but cannot be called "he" since there isn't a gender to inanimate objects. Inanimate objects also cannot write books
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@splicedenergy The multiverse has always existed? You are assuming that there is a multiverse, but there might not be. It is, after all, a hypothesis. However, let us suppose that there is a multiverse. What makes you think 'a priori' that it must have always existed? There must be something whose non-existence is impossible, but, even if there is a multiverse, this necessary reality doesn't have to be identified with it...
bayreuth79 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 We do know there is more than our universe duh, and when you can bet your bottom dollar that only a god that had no beginning and is eternal but impossible for a natural process cannot be. Do you even notice how ridiculous that is? I figure you dont. We are little animals on a little planet in a teeny arm of an average galaxy and although all this is natural, you'll still insist god made it. You dont want to broaden your knowledge you want to show how little you are
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@splicedenergy You are profoundly mistaken. We do not know that there is a multiverse! "The multiverse is a metaphysical guess" (Prof John Polkinghorne, world-class particle physicist, from Cambridge university). If you consult any physicist- such as Prof Hawking, Prof Kaku, etc,.- you will discover how wrong you are.
Your argument is absurd. There is no conflict between natural processes and God's creative activities. You have to distinguish between first and second order causality.
bayreuth79 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 No I am not. I've read Hawkins books, I've seen pretty much every documentary by Kaku, I've watched every single episode of the 5 seasons of Universe, I've heard numerous lectures and documentaries with Brian Cox and Neil degrasse tyson, Micheal Sherman, the list goes on and on. I've also studied to great lengths of where all religions and gods through thousands of years became and evolved in that time. I know what I'm talking about, dont insult my intelligence again.
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@splicedenergy Do you think it absurd that God had no beginning? If you do, I'm afraid you are in a bit of a bind. Earlier you said that that multiverse has always existed. If it has always existed, then it had no beginning. So, if there is no inherent contradiction in saying that the multiverse has no beginning, why not God? But of course the multiverse may not exist anyway. I'm afraid you need to broaden your knowledge because 1) you're ignorant of physics 2) you're ignorant of theology.
bayreuth79 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 Have you ever heard of Brian Cox, Neil Degrassse Tyson, Micheal shermer, just to name a few. Its in the fucking math. There is no room for opinion when math is fact
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 Dont fucking insult my intelligence, this may be the internet but I use the internet, I use university, I use Scientific professors to tell me what the reality is and how they came about finding that reality. Not to mention I am a documentary junkie if there ever was one.; Stop talking to me if you are going to be a fallacious unwarranted snob
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@splicedenergy I just quoted a physicist from Cambridge university. You quote a physicist who claims to know that there is a multiverse.
I have degrees from Cambridge (uk) and Yale (U.S). I'm telling you that you have no idea whatsoever about physics and you are certainly ignorant of what we mean by "God".
bayreuth79 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 You honestly are so stupid to believe that I am stupid enough to believe you are an ivy league educated person and yet sitting at a pc somewhere arguing on you tube about physics and it was gods formula, I'm not stupid. But you most definitely are stupid enough to not know when to stop being and saying stupid things. 1 quote mine gives you just as much credibility as you began with. I gave you world renowned astrophysicists and you made shit up from scratch. Congrats, you fail
splicedenergy 11 months ago 8
@splicedenergy Lol, touche for calling that Ivy league guy stupid.
CrippledKnight 11 months ago
@CrippledKnight I have a great thirst for knowledge I can never seem to quench, insulting my intelligence is about the worst thing someone can say to me. And there is no way he is an Ivy league graduate, since the dumb ass simply said ivy league instead of actually calling it by name, or say such retarded shit to make himself look like he's something he obviously is not. He's a lying prick bastard
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 There are thousands of gods, you have one in mind. It doesn't matter who, because all the who's who in the fairy tales amount to the same chunk of bullshit as the rest. I took theology at William and Mary for 5 enlightening years. I went in Pentecostal and came out feeling betrayed spewed upon and manipulated in speech and song. They are all wrong and they know it, all religions have to do and say to have anyone left in the pews at the end of the day. Im not living in lies anymore
splicedenergy 11 months ago
@bayreuth79 Well you best start naming the 10s of thousands of gods and narrowing the one that "created" the universe, then get it peer reviewed and critiqued and perhaps I will concede then. But only then. I'll bet you cant even tell me how many jesus's are living right now this very minute. Do not presume to know a god damn thing
splicedenergy 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
inner electron orbits can be exactly calculated by elliptic functions (see Klaus Huber Cauer Filters) - it also supports more exact calculation for satellite obits
- the universe is not as uncalculable but is a wonder of symmetry and we should be grateful to be allowed to have a small glimpse of the order - Einstein and Bohr are restored - and S.Hawking is awesome
khi590 1 year ago
Quran: Do they beleive that GOD made him for Nothing.yet they don,t believe on GOD
i think its the best answer in the world that we don,t know nothing we don,t have even a glimpse of knowledge of GOD yet he is the one because if GOD was more than 2 i bet The 2nd GOD will show him self during the 15 billion years to unsolve this mystery of god.
if you don,t beleive on GOD just give me a simple scientific defination that proves that big bang was a anonymous process
umerhaleem 1 year ago
ever occured to anyone why world leading scientests and inventors are athiests? or atleast, God had no intervention/place in their productions??
theWACKIIRAQI 1 year ago
@theWACKIIRAQI ever occured to anyone why world leading scientests and inventors are athiests? or atleast, God had no intervention/place in their productions??
_____
He who makes such a claim, the answer will be that though in both these matters man's planning and action have played a role, yet the means whereby his planning and action achieve the goal, is a gift from the bounty of Allah Almighty, underlying therein.
1tabligh 1 year ago
Supposing he had not been gifted with the tonnage for speech, or the intellect had not been bestowed on him to guide him to such activity, he could never have been able to talk, and if he had not been blessed with the palm and the fingers, it would never have been possible for him to write.
1tabligh 1 year ago
You should learn a lesson from the animals in this behalf, who lave neither the power to speak nor the power to write. As such it is the principle laid down by the Almighty Creator for man's fundamental nature as a special boon, for which whoever is grateful shall get the heavenly rewards, while whoever denies will be ignored, for Allah Almighty is independent of the whole universe.
1tabligh 1 year ago
@1tabligh my answer to you is simple my friend....EVOLUTION...seriously you are arguing that we developed speech because god decided to? do u have anything to back up ur claim? i can claim any thing in the world but i can only be awarded for the things i can prove achieved
theWACKIIRAQI 1 year ago
@theWACKIIRAQI my friend....EVOLUTION...
_____
Many new questions in regard to almost every principle mentioned by Darwin have arisen. For example, it is asked whether the appearance of a new organ or for that matter any other organic change, always results from the use of that organ and the attempt to adapt it to one's environment or it may be due to mutation or any other cause?
1tabligh 1 year ago
The acquired qualities are hereditable as a principle or genetic investigations have rejected this theory?
The organic changes, whatever may be their cause, are always aimed at survival and evolution or sometimes they may be due to the inconsistency with the environmental conditions and may culminate in death and extinction?
Natural selection is or is not like artificial selection which leads the existing generation to evolution?
1tabligh 1 year ago
@1tabligh dude..you are a typical case of lost and confused 21st century creationist..as soon as any of you (specially Muslims) get cornered you start going on and on with lots and lots of excess and unnecessary informations/myths to detour the conversation...
one last thing...I will wait for scientists like him (Mr Hawkins) and others to explain why we exist in the universe..not you and some books written by a business man (mohamed) or a carpenter (jesus) 1500-2000 years ago.
theWACKIIRAQI 1 year ago
@1tabligh hey...do you know how to make a useful sentence for a change? do you know where to use question marks? i am so sorry that this conversation is becoming more and more personal due to the fact that I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE U TALKING ABOUT
theWACKIIRAQI 1 year ago
@theWACKIIRAQI
Answer the question!
Dodging ALL the questions and quibbling in vain!
Materialism looks at the world with one eye *closed* and, as a result, is unable to answer numerous questions!
Deluded atheist looks at the world with BOTH eyes *closed* and, as a result, are unable to answer ALL the questions!
So much science for this brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
1tabligh 1 year ago
@1tabligh 1-If u can simplify the question u'd do me a huge favor cuz my language is arabic so im trying my best.2-religious advocates been mumbling for the last 2000 years..what did they bring to the human civilization other than judging and persecution?.3.western scientists been answering the big questions very successfully as soon as they had the freedom to do so (renaissance) barely 200 yrs ago. what did the church/mosque bring to us other than destruction?
theWACKIIRAQI 1 year ago
@theWACKIIRAQI We find that the wild animals and plants are alike and of average type, whereas the artificial selection gives the animals and plants more variety and leads them to better evolution. There are many other questions of this sort. Anyhow, in spite of all the objections raised to discredit it, the theory of evolution has been accepted by the scientists as an objective principle of natural sciences. At the same time it is also certain that prominent and unbiased naturalists do not
1tabligh 1 year ago