Chess Analysis: artea(provisional) vs filco(1701) [Part 3/3]

[sggsix]

This is my first time watching a formal chess match. in the "name(#)," is the # some sort of rank?

[keypenboardcil]

This is really a casual game, it's a "rated" game on Free Internet Chess Server. The # beside the name is a measure of the player's strength (determined by how many games you win or lose against other players...it's also a function of their ratings as well. if you win a game against someone with a higher rating, you'll receive a few points, and he'll lose points). haha i don't know if this really explained anything.

[Patsan120]

not bad, well played

[cpapanik]

nice game and well played

[MAPEZ]

at 0:55, white had easy possibility pawn F3 , and then try to trade rocks and destroy black's attack.

Let me know what you think, artea.

See ya

[keypenboardcil]

Hey Mapez, you're right about F3 as a defence, I actually made a note of that in the Description box in the [Part1/3] video. I think it would have made more sense to post it in 3/3 though. I didn't conduct an analysis after F3, but I still favor black because white's bishop is hemmed in at the moment.

Thanks for watching!

[asaf92]

Well played